It seems that he is hoping that UT ends up somehow screwed in all of this and ATM laughs all the way to their promised BCS title glory and 40 virgins in the SEC. The cherry on top will be that ATM was the domino that got the whole thing in motion.
I think you are inferring quite a bit with this statement. I get this from many of the UT Alums I know. They can't seem to grasp that going to the SEC is about a bigger stage and improvement through better competition. Everyone points out the risks to A&M, which are legitimate. All I can say is, no risk no reward. Of course a move to the SEC comes with risk of failure. But so does staying in the Big 12.
From my point of view, the move to the SEC is about breaking from tradition, which is rare in the world of TAMU, and facing the challenge of the best college football conference.
Good for ATM for getting what it wanted, but you're delusional if you can't realize that UT will be given every option out there and rightfully so. Move on with your new conference affiliation. The faux concern for UT betrays your new independent, SEC badass persona.
I think UT will have many options to choose from, rightfully so or not. I just don't know which one is their primary goal. One thing to keep in mind is this change, just as it applies with A&M, involves some risk for UT. Jim seems to have some inside information, which I'd love to know. I don't have his professional level of interest, obviously. I do find the situation interesting in how this plays out.
However, in regards to your statements on the whole. Don't you think you're being a tad bit sensitive? Given all the Aggie bashing over our wrong-headed, stubborn hick, cry-baby behavior you'd stop for a second and realize it isn't all about the past. Sometimes it's about moving to a better situation in the future. That's what the LHN is about, right? Improving the revenue streams and recruiting platform for UT? Why is it any different for A&M? So A&M opted for the SEC instead of a regional sports network. What's the problem?