Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Bob Sakamano

Pages: [1]
1
Talk Zone / Re: Keppinger for PTNBL
« on: April 02, 2009, 04:02:42 pm »
A top 10 prospect that might not crack the top 15 in other org's.  He was being groomed as a utility player in the AFL.  A guy who can platoon now verses a guy who might be a good bench player later is a good trade IMHO

Thank you for posting this. I seriously feel like my head is going to explode when fans either praise or criticize deals by team prospect ranking systems, because without any context they're completely irrelevant. The #1 prospect in one system might be the #15 prospect in another... or vice versa, etc. In the case of the Astros, the system is perceived as being weak now, so the numbers are inflated. I certainly haven't seen any projections of Sutton being more than a good bench player, so I wouldn't lose sleep if he is the PTBNL.

2
Talk Zone / Re: Mike Lamb released by the Brewers
« on: April 01, 2009, 11:24:04 am »
except that Lamb does not play 3B too well if he has to play several days in a row. he has been released by 2-3 teams since he left Houston. perhaps there is a reason for that.

Oh, absolutely agreed on the defense. But it would be part of a platoon situation so it wouldn't be on an everyday basis, and I'm sure Blum would have some starts as well to further limit Lamb's potential time in the field. I'm not sure if the club trusts Blum's middle infield defense enough to make him the primary backup at SS/2B, but if they do, I would definitely love Lamb's bat on the bench more than Smith's.

I get that he was released by the Twins and Brewers, but at the same time, he's one season removed from his very solid 2007 campaign here. It's not like he's three or more years removed from being a good player. Mike has always been a big "comfort" guy as well, in that he absolutely loved the clubhouse here and from what I've heard didn't have the best experiences up north.

I think it would be worth giving him a call, but I don't know the financial situation so it's hard to say with any certainty.

3
Talk Zone / Re: Notes from Footer
« on: April 01, 2009, 10:19:56 am »
I still wouldn't mind seeing the 'Stros pick him up and use Keppinger in the Jason Smith role.

I think it would be Blum in the Jason Smith role, as you'd still need Keppinger as the right-handed part of the 3B platoon.

4
Talk Zone / Re: Mike Lamb released by the Brewers
« on: April 01, 2009, 10:13:13 am »
McPherson was released today by the Marlins, as well. Wonder if WadeSmith would consider adding one of those two (Lamb/McPherson) as the left-handed half of the 3B platoon and moving Blum to the super-utility role that seemed destined for Smith. I think it would be an upgrade, but not sure of the financial situation right now, especially after adding Pudge and now another ML contract in Keppinger.

5
Talk Zone / Re: Johnson
« on: March 03, 2009, 02:35:42 pm »
Good point, however I contend that Pence was not seen by major league teams as a guy who could hurt them in the lineup so he got a lot of challenge pitches.  Right in his happy zone and give it up for Pence, he knows what to do with those types of pitches.  Is 2007 indicative of his talent?  Yes, yes it is.  Is it indicative of his understanding how to play at the major league level?  No. No it isn't.  See the difference?

I don't know if you've seen the level of play at AAA or AA, but suffice it to say, you don't just get fed fastballs in challenge situations in AAA.  You are just as liable to see a slider on a 3-2 count or a 2-0 count as you would see a fastball.  That's what Johnson needs right now.  It was what Pence needed in 2007 to an extent because now he's having to learn this at the major league level.  If he doesn't learn it, he'll be an average player hitting in the lower rung of a lineup for the rest of his career.  Mind you, that's not a bad gig because when we say a lower rung player, we're still talking about an elite player when measured against all those players who never get the chance to play at that level (and most of them do not have the talent that Hunter has).  I never question Hunter's talent (at least not when hitting a baseball, when it comes to playing CF, there is plenty to talk about there!), in 2007 it was about whether he was *ready* for the majors.  His hitting was outstanding, but he didn't prove he was ready as evidenced by 2008.  It just proved he is one very talented hitter... when all things are in his favor.

The major leagues are about adjustments and to have a better handle on adjustments, sometimes the AAA experience is what does it for a player (sometimes it doesn't).  I would dare say that Pence is in no way the same as Albert Pujols who broke into the majors without any AAA experience and has not looked back since.  So you may be wrong about what you thought about Pence in 2007, but I know what I thought and it still holds true today.

I completely agree, Noe. There's no doubt that many of the adjustments and challenges Pence faced in 2008 and still faces today could have at least partially been dealt with through a more extensive stint in AAA. I'd agree that it would be to his long-term benefit as a player to spend more time in AAA. However, even with his flaws in approach, he was still an excellent hitter in 2007 and a good hitter in 2008. As such, it was to the Astros' short-term benefit as a team that he be called up (and make no mistake, he made them a much better team than they were with Burke/Lane in CF).

For me, of course I prioritize the long-term development of a player ahead of buying a team a couple of extra wins in 2009. But the Astros, at least in recent years, have taken a decidedly short-term approach -- i.e. go all out to be in the mix in September in a given year, and worry about the rest later. My concern is that Pence's initial success would make them more open, not less, to a "hot spring" scenario carrying over into the season and catching lightning in a bottle. I hope I'm wrong and underestimating WadeSmith.

6
Talk Zone / Re: Johnson
« on: March 03, 2009, 11:47:03 am »
You'd think that they learned a little bit from the Hunter Pence hot spring (or Luke Scott hot spring of several years ago).  Johnson, like Pence before him, got promoted to AAA late last year and had a so-so time of it.  Pence benefitted from a really good AFL experience and carried that right into spring.  Pence tends to ride emotion and confidence when playing baseball, so it stands to reason that he was really up for doing well his spectacular spring.  So what I'm saying is, don't ever underestimate the power of Pam and what she would think about appeasing fans to bring in more business dollars to the cofers.

Baseball people have a say, but you see how far that got Purpura.

I agree that Pam has too much influence on what should be baseball decisions, but I'm not so sure what the Astros would take out of the Hunter Pence hot spring (assuming you're talking about 2007) as a reason to either not place Johnson on the opening day roster or promote at some point in April. Pence came in and was honestly one of the catalysts for the Astros' offense in 2007. He was fantastic. His problems, at least on a consistent basis, didn't show up until 2008.

Now, the Luke Scott situation is a perfect parallel, and I agree with the premise that a hot spring doesn't mean Chris Johnson is ready for the majors. But Pence proved a lot of us wrong and was a very, very good player in 2007 and proved he belonged at the ML level.

7
Talk Zone / Re: Lidge wins NL Comeback Player of the Year
« on: October 01, 2008, 05:00:01 pm »
Hmm, that's strange, Yahoo has it as this:

R. Braun doubled to right, R. Durham to third, R. Durham scored on second baseman C. Utley's fielding error

Anyway, it's cosmetic so it doesn't matter, I was just curious.

8
Talk Zone / Re: Lidge wins NL Comeback Player of the Year
« on: October 01, 2008, 04:54:08 pm »
And he nails down the save in Game 1, albeit in dramatic fashion.

Coming in with a 3-0 lead, he mixed three strikeouts with a double, single, walk, and wild pitch that left the tying run on second with two out. 

Just a cosmetic question (I didn't get to watch the game, had to follow online), but why was Lidge charged with an earned run? Box score says the Brewers only run came on an Utley error.

9
Beer and Queso / Re: March Madness
« on: March 24, 2008, 01:02:43 pm »
How often do the refs make that call?

A lot, when UCLA is in the opposite position. Hell, they'll even make it when UCLA is down two and they aren't touched.



Two weeks ago, Bruins were down 2 to Stanford in the final seconds. With one second left, Stanford makes a picture perfect block to seal the game. Except refs blow a whistle, UCLA makes two free throws, and wins in overtime.

The Bruins are becoming the NCAA's version of the Shaq-Kobe Lakers in terms of how they're officiated.

10
Beer and Queso / Re: March Madness
« on: March 23, 2008, 11:01:36 am »
As much as I hate to say it, I think Kansas is the best team in college basketball, and it may not be that close. I wouldn't be too discouraged -- Texas played Kansas down to the wire with the Jayhawks playing about as well as they could play (50 percent behind the arc) at that.

I think KU was the best team last year as well, but drew a terrible matchup of No. 2 UCLA in California for their regional final.

11
Talk Zone / Re: Seeking Astros fans in D.C. area
« on: March 20, 2008, 10:07:01 pm »
Present.

12
Talk Zone / Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« on: November 27, 2007, 09:19:34 am »
Quote
For what?  I didn't think anything could make me a Brian Moehler fan, but even he is likely to be less worse than Brocail.  Isn't Brocail older than Jim R???

I know he's 40 and could fall off the cliff at any point, but Brocail is coming off a season where he went 5-1 with a 3.05 ERA in 76 innings. That's far superior to Moehler. And before anyone mentions Petco as the reason, he was actually much better on the road.

Not to say I expect the same kind of production here, but he has the potential to be solid.

13
Talk Zone / Re: Blum back in Mud and Blood?
« on: November 14, 2007, 11:39:34 am »
I guess this answers the question from earlier this week about who the LH bat off the bench will be. 

Pinwheel mentioned him as a utility guy with the ability to play 2B; did he ever play there in his first stint with the team?

He played a lot of 2B this season, too, when Marcus Giles went into the tank.

14
Talk Zone / Re: Luis Castillo anyone?
« on: November 03, 2007, 01:17:48 pm »
Burke's name gives me a gag reflex. 

How's Castillo's defense?  Matsui's a FA, but I bet Colorado will do everything to keep him.

He's won three Gold Gloves and has a reputation as a defensive specialist.

15
Talk Zone / Re: Luis Castillo anyone?
« on: November 03, 2007, 01:08:35 pm »
This makes a lot of sense. Pursuing Hunter/Rowand upgrades the defense, but from an offensive perspective, they're probably comparable to Scott, but making $10-$15 million more.

Castillo clearly upgrades one of the Astros' current weaknesses (well, without Loretta) heading into 2008 from both an offensive and defensive perspective. In addition, it's been a while since the team has had a legitimate lead-off hitter in the .360 OBP range with a very low strikeout total.

If Rosenthal is accurate, I like this a lot.

16
Talk Zone / Re: Trade talk
« on: July 27, 2007, 12:54:32 pm »
After further (sight unseen) research, I have to agree.

I'm not sure. I've always heard plate discipline was an issue for Anderson, and his minor league OBP is consistently in the .330 range (except for the first part of 2004 in Lexington). Bourn's minor league OBP is .371, if I remember correctly. To me, that's a sizable difference. I'm not saying that's enough to make the trade worthwhile, but I'd say he's a more disciplined hitter.

That said, Anderson seems to have more extra-base potential, so maybe that evens things out.

17
Talk Zone / Re: Wandy
« on: July 06, 2007, 10:50:49 pm »
Just remember... all the sports talk radio "fans" whining about how brilliant they are and how dumb the Astros are for not playing Pence out of spring training...these are the same ones who said Garner and Purpura should lose their jobs for their blind devotion to Wandy.

18
Talk Zone / Re: Garner in the postgame - 7/2/07
« on: July 03, 2007, 12:07:12 am »
That was Justice, not Ortiz.

19
Talk Zone / Re: If you like feeling rage...
« on: March 20, 2007, 05:06:28 pm »
 
Quote:

I remain unconvinced that our post-season moves have helped us all that much in this category, or that Carlos Lee isn't going to implode by June.




Thanks for all the evidence to support that ridiculous assertion. Talk about whining for the sake of whining. Ridiculous.

20
Talk Zone / Re: Gimenez to have season-ending surgery
« on: February 26, 2007, 03:00:38 pm »
Quote:

Footer strategically reminds us that this opens a spot on the 40 The Link

Munson is still a possible.  But he's just a stop gap.  The way Purpura was talking about the future of the catching spot, they may want to give Quintero an extended chance.  There was some consideration that since both catchers were out of options the Astros might try to use one in a trade scenario.  That is obviously gone now.





I'd agree with that. Most folks, Footer included, in the offseason have discussed the backup catcher having a significantly more important role (maybe 2 out of 5 instead of 1 out of 5) this season given Ausmus' age. Given that, I'd guess the defensive skills of the backup catcher become more important, and that's what gives Quintero a huge edge now.

21
Talk Zone / Gimenez to have season-ending surgery
« on: February 26, 2007, 02:31:31 pm »
The Link

Quote:

Astros catcher Gimenez expected to have shoulder surgery

By JOSE DE JESUS ORTIZ
Copyright 2007 Houston Chronicle

KISSIMMEE, Fla. - Hector Gimenez, who entered Astros training camp competing for the backup catcher?s job, expects to have right shoulder surgery to repair a torn right labrum. He was examined by Dr. Tom Lintner on today.

It appears as though Gimenez will be lost for the season, he says.

?I think I?m going to lose the year,? he said. ?For me it?s difficult, but it?s a problem I?ve had for two years now. I get better and then it gets hurt again, better and then hurt again. I?d rather lose a year than my whole career.?





Humberto, it's your job.  

22
Talk Zone / White, Sauerbeck signed to MLCs
« on: February 02, 2007, 06:09:30 pm »
Sauerbeck didn't have a terrible season last year, particularly with Oakland (although very limited sample size). I wouldn't be surprised if he made the team as the second lefty.

The Link

23
Talk Zone / Re: Unchained DQ Time
« on: February 01, 2007, 11:58:49 am »
I understand the anger, but I hope we're not seriously going the criticize him for losing a start where he gave up 1 earned run in six innings.

24
Talk Zone / Re: Hunter Pence
« on: December 28, 2006, 06:28:40 pm »
Quote:

Looks like a lot of booze and young ladies. Is Pence the opening day starting center fielder or does he start if Lane falters?




Neither... it's Burke.

Pence's shot comes in 2008 after Burke moves to second.

25
Talk Zone / Re: Astros trade for Jennings
« on: December 12, 2006, 07:11:33 pm »
I don't think you'll find anyone in the world who considers Buchholz anywhere close to an A level pitching prospect.

For what it's worth, Jennings was the 11th ranked VORP pitcher in all of baseball last season. Yes, it's just one season. But, the fact that his peripherals were good is encouraging because it appears this was more than being lucky (i.e. a lot of balls hit right at a fielder). Instead, his stuff became more effective.

Doesn't mean it's going to last, but it's a good sign.

The Link

26
Talk Zone / Re: Who Dat! (non-BB)
« on: December 11, 2006, 05:41:20 pm »
If the Saints make the Super Bowl, it'll have a whole lot more to do with the resurgence of that defense and an MVP year from Drew Brees than it will from Reggie Bush.

27
Talk Zone / Re: Jon Heyman: "Taylor Buchholz failed his physical..."
« on: December 07, 2006, 03:15:03 pm »
According to Buchholz himself, he did not fail a physical.

The Link

28
Talk Zone / Re: Astros set to get pitcher Jon Garland from White Sox
« on: December 07, 2006, 01:08:49 pm »
Now there's a report on the White Sox board that Peter Gammons is reporting that Kenny Williams is returning to the meetings and Houston plans to announce the deal.

I don't have any clue what's going on.

29
Talk Zone / Re: Astros set to get pitcher Jon Garland from White Sox
« on: December 07, 2006, 01:03:24 pm »
No, it's one thing when the Chronicle has sources that say it. Unless you're thinking this is fabricated.

The deal was close, according to Tal Smith, the Astros? president of baseball operations.

The Chronicle didn't say it. Tal Smith said it. As for comparing it to Oswalt, that's a very different situation. The front office didn't go out and confirm that.

30
Talk Zone / Re: Astros set to get pitcher Jon Garland from White Sox
« on: December 07, 2006, 12:57:48 pm »
I'm not sure what this front office is thinking. Maybe the White Sox did some dirty things, but if not, I'm very disappointed. You never, ever say a deal is close (a statement from the front office) unless it's agreed to by both parties. Now, if this doesn't work out, you potentially have angered Willy, Buchholz, Pettitte and Hirsh. Maybe the White Sox screwed us here, but if not, I'm disappointed in Smith's quote.

31
Talk Zone / Cubs sign Lilly
« on: December 06, 2006, 09:14:50 pm »
The Link

To say I'm concerned would be an understatement. Lilly wanted to go to New York. The Yanks were interested, but apparently decided not to offer. Now, there's only one pitcher for the Yanks to turn their attention to...

I hope the Yankees get burned, but they seem confident, and that worries me.

32
Talk Zone / Re: In a Tavares/Boras trade, what do we have to get
« on: December 01, 2006, 02:59:08 pm »
You'll be lucky to get one young starter. To get two young starters or even approach names like Willis and Cabrera, you'll have to add names like Patton, Hirsh and Pence to the discussion.

33
Talk Zone / Re: Purpura interview on MLB radio
« on: November 29, 2006, 09:28:50 pm »
Listening to Purp on Astroline now, he's talking about Lane as a potential CF. He bragged on him quite a bit, discussing the weight he's lost and how he views Lane as one of our best defensive outfielders. He said it was actually Lane's idea... apparently Lane came to them in recent weeks asking to give him a shot in center.

imo, it seems like Jason sees the writing on the wall in regards to the LF and RF spots, and he's looking to find a new way into the lineup.

34
Talk Zone / Re: Purpura interview on MLB radio
« on: November 29, 2006, 03:00:34 pm »
Like you, I took away a similar impression about Lane as a hitter - I just didn't take it to mean RF.

35
Talk Zone / Re: Purpura interview on MLB radio
« on: November 28, 2006, 09:07:27 pm »
If Lane hits anywhere close to what he hit in 2005, he's a clear upgrade offensively from Taveras. My guess is that's what Purpura is thinking. Is it a risk? Absolutely, but reading between the lines and looking at this organization's history, that's my guess.

36
Talk Zone / Re: Purpura interview on MLB radio
« on: November 28, 2006, 09:02:25 pm »
I think we all need to look a little deeper at what management is doing. When they sent Lane down in the middle of last season, one of the stated reasons was to get him some repetition at centerfield. We've read in recent days that Lane is going to play winter ball... yet again at CF.

We've also seen, both in quotes and over time, that Garner isn't particularly enamored with a lot of things Willy does at the plate. This is also an organization that's started both Craig Biggio and Lance Berkman in center in recent years.

I could be wrong - and I'm not necessarily saying I support the idea - but imo, there's more to the Lane at CF idea than a lot of you realize. I think if Lane starts (and I'm not saying he will, but if) it's in center, not right. Scott is in the lineup.

37
Talk Zone / Re: the rest of the off season
« on: November 25, 2006, 11:46:42 am »
Not nearly as much as age, but his numbers did take a nosedive between 2005 and 2006, both offensively and defensively. I know he's there to call the game and not to post numbers - but imo it's a slight factor of consideration. That along with his age makes me think the "other" catcher - whoever it may be - plays more than the 1 in 5 games they played a year ago. Do you guys think I'm wrong on that? I very well could be, that's just my guess at how it breaks down.

38
Talk Zone / Re: the rest of the off season
« on: November 25, 2006, 11:34:50 am »
My main question... what is Tim looking at to pair with Brad at the catching position? Given Brad's age and declining production, it seems unlikely he'll play 4 out of 5 days again next year. More like 3, and perhaps even 2 if the other catcher's bat was suitable. But is it a certainty that Gimenez/Quintero will be the other guy in that scenario, or is Purp looking at the trade/FA market (Molina/Zaun/Estrada) to see if anyone falls through the cracks for cheap? (And even if they do, do the Stros have the money?)

39
Talk Zone / Re: The Void
« on: October 30, 2006, 10:03:55 pm »
Those of you guys debating Mario and Bush need a dose of reality instead of ESPN's hype. Mario has quietly put together 3.5 sacks in the last 4 games. He's not tearing apart the league by any means, but he hasn't been terrible. He's consistently put some pressure on opposing quarterbacks. Reggie, on the other hand, is a running back averaging below 3 yards per carry with no offensive touchdowns. Yes, he's a decent receiver catching the ball out of the backfield - so is Kevin Faulk. What's supposed to distinguish Bush from the average, run of the mill pass catching third down back is his ability to make explosive plays in the running game on top of it - and he's nowhere close to that right now. He hasn't even been mediocre... he's been bad.

Am I saying I expect this to continue forever? No. But if you're going to blast the Texans, blast them over the quarterback situation. Blasting them over not taking Bush looks pretty silly right now. (And no, don't tell me anything about New Orleans' record. Replacing the biggest joke in the league - Aaron Brooks - with a Pro Bowl QB in Drew Brees has a lot to do with that. So does getting an All Pro RB in Deuce McAllister back from a season-ending injury. So does having 8 home games instead of 16 road games. So does a tremendously improved defense. etc., etc., etc.)

40
Talk Zone / Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« on: October 09, 2006, 10:32:22 pm »
Here's a quality case for A-Rod... with a large sampling of Richard Justice bashing to go along with it. A good read.

The Link

Hilarious stuff.

41
Talk Zone / Re: Berkman is leaving
« on: July 23, 2006, 10:09:04 pm »
I think that even if Lance is cleared to play for the Cincy series in a couple of days, the Astros would prefer him to play first and attempt to minimize his mobility in the field as opposed to playing right.

So, if that's the case... what would you folks expect the lineup to be? Lamb to third and Huff in right? Or minimize the Lamb at third experience by leaving Huff there, inserting Scott in right and bringing Lamb off the bench until Lance can more reasonably play the outfield?

42
Talk Zone / Re: Rondell White
« on: December 18, 2005, 02:41:49 pm »
It should be mentioned again, however, that MMP doesn't exactly require a cannon out of the left-fielder. I understand there are some exceptions to this, like there are to everything, but for the most part the damage of having a poor arm can be minimized by the park. As bad as White's arm is, I can't imagine it's much worse than Chris Burke's, and the Astros were able to play him in left for a large part of last season.

43
Talk Zone / Re: "serious" negotiations w/Rondell White??
« on: December 13, 2005, 08:34:56 pm »
I'm not saying it's no issue at all, but overall it's less of one than it is in other parks. I don't think Burke would've gotten nearly as many starts in left if they played 81 games at RFK, for example.

44
Talk Zone / Re: "serious" negotiations w/Rondell White??
« on: December 13, 2005, 08:00:56 pm »
It also makes sense given MMP. White's biggest weakness is his lack of arm strength in left, but with left field as short as it is here, that's not nearly as much of an issue.

45
Talk Zone / Re: "Last" Chance Drawing?
« on: October 23, 2005, 06:24:14 pm »
Actually, it looks like there is or was a third drawing. Now on the event pages on ticketmaster.com:

 
Quote:

 Additional Information
Successful Astros.com 3rd Chance random drawing winners will be allowed to purchase a total of four (4) tickets to one of the potential games or tickets for multiple games adding up to a total of four (4). These tickets may not be contiguous or may be Standing-Room-Only (no seat provided). THIS IS FIRST-COME, FIRST-SERVED SALE WHILE SUPPLIES LAST.





I hate the lotto. 6 emails, three lotteries, 18 chances... no hits. Just one chance... that's all I want. Don't even have to get tickets. Would just like to have the chance to try.

46
Talk Zone / Re: WOOHOO! I'm a second chance winner!
« on: October 20, 2005, 10:44:19 pm »
Quote:

I just got the email too!   FLIPPING SWEEEET!!

noe wtime to decide which game to go too.





Did you just get it or just check it? Wondering if they're still being sent out or if they were all sent at the same time (about 5:30).

47
Talk Zone / Re: It Is Now "Monday, Central Time"
« on: October 17, 2005, 03:33:29 am »
Two guys on another somewhat reliable site (ClutchFans) reported getting the email - one actually provided visual proof. Both said it came around 10:15 central. I can't imagine that of all the fans on all these boards, only two got it, but considering both reported getting it at the same time... I'm getting worried that the emails have been sent. Someone please chime in and tell me about how you got an email in the last 30 minutes and I'm wrong.  

48
Talk Zone / Re: So.........NO ONE Has Gotten an Email Yet???
« on: October 17, 2005, 12:16:27 am »
Not to put a downer on this, but before NLDS tickets went onsale two Mondays ago, there was a presale for astros.com members. They said the password would be emailed Sunday. I never got it and sat here cursing my luck for the email not coming... but I called a couple of friends and they didn't get one either. It did end up coming... at 7 a.m. the next morning. I hope it isn't the same with this - after all, I do believe the emails came on time last year - but there is precedent for it being the following morning.  

49
Talk Zone / Re: Game 3
« on: October 03, 2005, 04:49:00 pm »
Thanks. I'm assuming those last three are subject to change if the other series end early. But it's at least good to have an idea of what they're looking at.

50
Talk Zone / Re: Game 3
« on: October 03, 2005, 04:19:09 pm »
Where'd you guys see that Saturday is at 12:05? I've been looking everywhere since I have tickets, but MLB.com still has it as TBD.

Pages: [1]