Author Topic: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod  (Read 9052 times)

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« on: October 07, 2006, 10:49:38 pm »
I don't give a flying fuck what he's done in the postseason.  Those are bogus, small sample numbers.

I didn't realize the Rangers are paying $10m a year of his outrageous salary.  If you could get the Yankees to take Morgan Ensberg, Brad Lidge, and let's say Taylor Buchholz (this isn't about getting rid of Buchholz; the Yankees aren't giving ARod away) and they agreed to pay $5m a year of his salary, making his Astros salary $10m a year....would you do the deal?

I would.  Leaves enough money for Lee, possibly Schmidt, and a couple middle relievers.

C - Ausmus, Gimenez?
1B - Lance
2B - Craig
SS - Adam
3B - ARod
LF - Lee
CF - Willy
RF - Huff?

Zan

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 333
  • BU Webguy's friend
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2006, 12:22:56 am »
I don't think there's a chance the Yankees would accept that trade even if they kept $0 of his contract on their books. And if the Yankees would accept that trade, I'm guessing a few teams would line up to offer that much or more.

Frobie

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 513
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2006, 01:16:06 am »
I generally stay out of "You're the GM!" discussions because I've *been* the GM.

(Well, in Strat-O-Matic draft leagues, anyway, and I'm really terrible at it.)

That being said...

I'd do A-Rod for $10 million.




Wait, no, that's not what I meant.

If they could work out a deal to get him here and pay "only" that much, I'd be for it.  (Hear that, Purpura?)  My question is, Houston would presumably NOT be the only team that would be vying for his services.  So since the Yanks would want to get as much in return for him as possible (well, theoretically), what would other teams be offering?  Are there teams out there that would pay the whole $15 mil to sign him?

Froback

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2253
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2006, 02:49:40 am »
I thought A-Rod was pretty decent at SS, and then the team could keep Huff and play him at 3B...

I understand nobody is as good as AE at SS, but that would solve line-up issues with A-Rod replacing Everett, and then adding Lee to play LF and then I guess Scott in RF.

Line-up of something like this:
Taveras
Biggio/Burke
Berkman
A-Rod
Lee
Scott
Huff
Ausmus/Other
Pitcher

Just a thought.

CarolinaStro

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 284
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2006, 10:04:06 am »
Quote:

I thought A-Rod was pretty decent at SS, and then the team could keep Huff and play him at 3B...

I understand nobody is as good as AE at SS, but that would solve line-up issues with A-Rod replacing Everett, and then adding Lee to play LF and then I guess Scott in RF.

Line-up of something like this:
Taveras
Biggio/Burke
Berkman
A-Rod
Lee
Scott
Huff
Ausmus/Other
Pitcher

Just a thought.





I heard he no longer has the range to play SS based on his play this year at 3B.  Anyways, the Stros have a bigger problems at 3B than SS.  In the dreamland where ARod is playing in a Astro uni, he would definitely being doing it at 3B.  ARod only looks good at SS in fantasy BB which ironically is what the Yanks seem to be playing and failing at lately.

CarolinaStro

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 284
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #5 on: October 08, 2006, 10:18:51 am »
Quote:

I don't give a flying fuck what he's done in the postseason.  Those are bogus, small sample numbers.

I didn't realize the Rangers are paying $10m a year of his outrageous salary.  If you could get the Yankees to take Morgan Ensberg, Brad Lidge, and let's say Taylor Buchholz (this isn't about getting rid of Buchholz; the Yankees aren't giving ARod away) and they agreed to pay $5m a year of his salary, making his Astros salary $10m a year....would you do the deal?

I would.  Leaves enough money for Lee, possibly Schmidt, and a couple middle relievers.

C - Ausmus, Gimenez?
1B - Lance
2B - Craig
SS - Adam
3B - ARod
LF - Lee
CF - Willy
RF - Huff?





I think Purp does that deal in a NY minute but no way someone else doesn't offer more.  My thought is with Pinella taking over and his history with ARod that they keep him and work it out.  The only REAL reason to trade ARod would be to improve their rotation.  The Stros don't really have the bait for such a trade (Hirsch, Albers, Buchholz, et al..) cause the Yanks tend to seek more established performers.  Obviously RoyO would do the trick but (even if his new no trade contract didn't exist)that would be insane.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #6 on: October 08, 2006, 01:42:47 pm »
hell, yes. no-brainer.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #7 on: October 08, 2006, 04:08:58 pm »
Ok, Ensberg, Lidge, some Yankee top prospect, and Buchholz to Florida, D-Train and Cabrera to Yanks, A-Rod to Astros?

homer

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6509
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #8 on: October 08, 2006, 04:22:49 pm »
Quote:

Ok, Ensberg, Lidge, some Yankee top prospect, and Buchholz to Florida, D-Train and Cabrera to Yanks, A-Rod to Astros?




Cabrera and D-Train to Houston. A-Rod can go to LA.
Oye. Vamos, vamos.

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #9 on: October 08, 2006, 04:28:41 pm »
So...

ARod to Angels.  Weaver, Shields, Lidge and Buchholz to Yankees.  D-Train and Cabrera to Astros.  Pence, Ensberg, Mathis, and Izturis to Fish?

I think we need more teams.

homer

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6509
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #10 on: October 08, 2006, 04:34:09 pm »
Why can't the Astros deal with the Fish directly? Let the Yankees go do their own thing.
Oye. Vamos, vamos.

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #11 on: October 08, 2006, 04:37:34 pm »
Because this is about trading A-Rod.

Why in the world would the Fish deal Cabrera and D-Train for ANY group of unprovens?

Cabrera and D-Train for Oswalt and Berkman, if I'm the Fish.  Even if I'm owned by Loria.

homer

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6509
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #12 on: October 08, 2006, 04:40:56 pm »
Payroll. Even under club control, those two might make more than the rest of the team.
Oye. Vamos, vamos.

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #13 on: October 08, 2006, 05:02:43 pm »
When are those guys arb eligible?

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #14 on: October 08, 2006, 10:27:49 pm »
I'll be the dissenting voice. I don't know what kind of teammate he was in Seattle or in NY but when he was in Arlington his reputation was that of aloof, a loner, did absolutely nothing in the community and his hits/homers were in meaningless situations when the game was decided. This team has had a great clubhouse for years and I'm not sure this guy wouldn't bring it down. There was chatter here a while back that the Astros needed leadership. If you spend this kind of money, you should get some leadership as part of the package.

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #15 on: October 08, 2006, 10:34:57 pm »
That's cool.  Let me disagree entirely with your post.  

I can honestly say that I don't care if a baseball player is "part of the community" or if he goes straight home at night and sets cats on fire.  

I don't care if he's a leader in the clubhouse or if he'd rather wander around with a g-string on with thousand dollar bills folded lengthwise sticking out so he can show off how much he made per out that night.  

I don't buy that his hits/HRs come in meaningless times.  I'd like some proof of that.  Sounds like unsubstantiated bullshit to me.

If we paid him $10-$12m per, it's to drive in runs, not be team chaplain.  The Astros don't need a "leader" they need someone who can drive in some fucking runs.

toddthebod

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3385
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #16 on: October 08, 2006, 10:45:47 pm »
I would do the A-Rod deal in a second.  But there is some real doubt that he wants to be traded.  He has a no-trade clause and he has said many times that he wants to retire as a Yankee.  There is some reason to this madness.  If he accepts a trade, it means that Yankee stadium has beaten him and that he could not play in the limelight.  For someone who believes himself to be the greatest player in baseball, it is impossible for him to accept this failure.

As for where he would play, I would stick him at SS.  And maybe that's the draw that the Astros can use to bring him back to Texas.
Boom!

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #17 on: October 09, 2006, 12:58:15 am »
OK but you know good and well the Yanks aren't trading ARod for our flops. Nor is McLane likely to deal with Boras. But go ahead and enjoy your little dream sequence.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #18 on: October 09, 2006, 09:45:25 am »
Quote:

I would do the A-Rod deal in a second.  But there is some real doubt that he wants to be traded.  He has a no-trade clause and he has said many times that he wants to retire as a Yankee.  There is some reason to this madness.  If he accepts a trade, it means that Yankee stadium has beaten him and that he could not play in the limelight.  For someone who believes himself to be the greatest player in baseball, it is impossible for him to accept this failure.
 




Maybe you're right, but he's been there three seasons now, and you've gotta figure there will come a point when he says "fuck it, the people in this city are assholes." He won the MVP in 2005- that creeping Rodney Dangerfield sensation might be enough for him to agree to a trade. I could see the Angels being serious suitors.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

Houston

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1249
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #19 on: October 09, 2006, 10:22:58 am »
Let's just add some numbers that probably don't mean much, but are interesting to consider.

This year in Yankees Stadium -- amid the boos and NY media -- A-Rod hit .311 with 20 HR and 66 RBI. His OPS was .970 at "home".

One of the Astros biggest problems in recent years has been getting runners home from third with less than 2 outs. In those situations in the last three years, Rodriguez hits .294 with 5 HR and 80 RBI in 102 AB. He also has hit .383 with the bases loaded in that time with 55 RBI in 47 AB.

By comparison, Lance Berkman hits .308 with a runner on third and less than 2 outs with 5 HR and 71 RBI in 78 AB. He has also hit .343 with 38 RBI in 35 AB.
"I don't want to play golf. When I hit a ball, I want someone else to go chase it." - Rogers Hornsby

Arky Vaughan

  • Administrator
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6335
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #20 on: October 09, 2006, 10:31:23 am »
Quote:

Let's just add some numbers that probably don't mean much, but are interesting to consider.

This year in Yankees Stadium -- amid the boos and NY media -- A-Rod hit .311 with 20 HR and 66 RBI. His OPS was .970 at "home".

One of the Astros biggest problems in recent years has been getting runners home from third with less than 2 outs. In those situations in the last three years, Rodriguez hits .294 with 5 HR and 80 RBI in 102 AB. He also has hit .383 with the bases loaded in that time with 55 RBI in 47 AB.

By comparison, Lance Berkman hits .308 with a runner on third and less than 2 outs with 5 HR and 71 RBI in 78 AB. He has also hit .343 with 38 RBI in 35 AB.





Why don't the Astros just find the player who led the league in batting average with runners on third and less than two outs and trade for that player? That way, they could address this specific need.

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #21 on: October 09, 2006, 10:35:41 am »
Preston Wilson?

Browneye

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 316
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #22 on: October 09, 2006, 02:54:40 pm »
Oh, but dont you want to know what pinwheel thinks????

The Link
"Do not rejoice in his defeat, you men. For though the world has stood up and stopped the bastard, the bitch that bore him is in heat again."

Browneye

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 316
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #23 on: October 09, 2006, 02:58:51 pm »
The best response to pinwheel's article blasting A-ROD.

"Anyone would have to be nuts to want A-ROD. Yeah, right.

All the bum did this year was hit 35 home runs, knock in 121 bat .290 with a .390 obp.

What a distraction those numbers would be for the Astros.

Can you imagine Ausmus, Bruntlett, Taveras, Palmeiro, Ensberg, Quintero, and Lane having to cope with a teammate like A-ROD? Might cause Garner's whole team to mutiny."

Nice.
"Do not rejoice in his defeat, you men. For though the world has stood up and stopped the bastard, the bitch that bore him is in heat again."

S.P. Rodriguez

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2932
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #24 on: October 09, 2006, 03:19:38 pm »
Quote:

The best response to pinwheel's article blasting A-ROD.

"Anyone would have to be nuts to want A-ROD. Yeah, right.

All the bum did this year was hit 35 home runs, knock in 121 bat .290 with a .390 obp.

What a distraction those numbers would be for the Astros.

Can you imagine Ausmus, Bruntlett, Taveras, Palmeiro, Ensberg, Quintero, and Lane having to cope with a teammate like A-ROD? Might cause Garner's whole team to mutiny."

Nice.





While I agree that under certain circumstances a trade for A-Rod is a no-brainer.  I can't agree that landing A-Rod guarantees the team improves.  I don't care what his numbers are.  This isn't fantasy baseball.  Is he a good baseball player?  Absolutely.  Is he a huge distraction?  He was in Dallas and he has been in NY.  Those are two distinctly different markets and he's been trouble in both places.  Should that matter on the field?  No, but it seems to have a negative impact on his ability to perform.  Would that be a problem in Houston?  Maybe, maybe not.  If it is, you can pretty much count on the Astros not being able to move him and get what they would have to give up to get him in return.  The risk is too high and the overall impact too uncertain, for me.  

Not to mention, he was a total douche in Dallas.  No, I'm not calling him a pussy or a wimp.  I'm simply saying he said and did nothing in the community.  Is that a factor?  Not for Alkie who could not care less.  For me, yeah, I could see losing some interest if A-Rod was used as their "marquee" attraction.  One, it's a giant F-U to Lance and Roy.  Two, we'd be bowing at the altar and putting our money in the collection used to appease Boras and those he serves and serve him.  Last, I'd still rather have Lee in LF and Huff at 3B if they can get the two combined for roughly the same money.  And anyone crazy enough to think NY will have to pick up any money in a trade puts too much value in the NY media.  All I say to that notion is 2005 AL MVP.  If NY has to throw in money in any deal, Cashman deserves to be fired.

ETA: in other words, and I hate to say this, I agree with Pinwheel.  However, I should probably date and post the link to the article because by the end of the playoffs,Pinwheel will be professing that A-Rod is be key to the Astros offseason plan/success.
"If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed."

"If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you; that is the principal difference between a dog and a man. "

-Mark Twain

HPFRic

  • Roster Filler
  • Posts: 159
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #25 on: October 09, 2006, 03:25:22 pm »
Quote:

I can honestly say that I don't care if a baseball player is "part of the community" or if he goes straight home at night and sets cats on fire.



it took him less than 3 years to wear out his welcome in dallas. and the guy won an MVP, ferchirssakes.

IF the yankees deal him, he'll be playing for his 3rd team in four years. i can't think of another athlete in (or even near) arod's class that can lay claim to such a distinction. even bonds hasn't accomplished that feat.

on the field, the guy is a beast... so why do teams seem so eager to get rid of him? i mean, the yankees are coming off a disappointing year.... and they want (maybe) want to jettison the guy who won an MVP last year? clue phone's ringing....

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #26 on: October 09, 2006, 04:53:52 pm »
I think Justice is spot-on saying the Yankees would covet Lidge, Wheeler, and Qualls in any deal, probably requiring at least two of them to get it done.  It's not going to be Lane, Ensberg, and Lidge for A-Rod.  That's an Astro fan delusion.

Let's not forget that the Astros, like just about every other team, need pitching badly.  Any potential deal with the Yankees is would make their quality pitching even more sparse.  They simply can't afford to do it-to say nothing of the Boras connection.


Quote:

Quote:

The best response to pinwheel's article blasting A-ROD.

"Anyone would have to be nuts to want A-ROD. Yeah, right.

All the bum did this year was hit 35 home runs, knock in 121 bat .290 with a .390 obp.

What a distraction those numbers would be for the Astros.

Can you imagine Ausmus, Bruntlett, Taveras, Palmeiro, Ensberg, Quintero, and Lane having to cope with a teammate like A-ROD? Might cause Garner's whole team to mutiny."

Nice.





While I agree that under certain circumstances a trade for A-Rod is a no-brainer.  I can't agree that landing A-Rod guarantees the team improves.  I don't care what his numbers are.  This isn't fantasy baseball.  Is he a good baseball player?  Absolutely.  Is he a huge distraction?  He was in Dallas and he has been in NY.  Those are two distinctly different markets and he's been trouble in both places.  Should that matter on the field?  No, but it seems to have a negative impact on his ability to perform.  Would that be a problem in Houston?  Maybe, maybe not.  If it is, you can pretty much count on the Astros not being able to move him and get what they would have to give up to get him in return.  The risk is too high and the overall impact too uncertain, for me.  

Not to mention, he was a total douche in Dallas.  No, I'm not calling him a pussy or a wimp.  I'm simply saying he said and did nothing in the community.  Is that a factor?  Not for Alkie who could not care less.  For me, yeah, I could see losing some interest if A-Rod was used as their "marquee" attraction.  One, it's a giant F-U to Lance and Roy.  Two, we'd be bowing at the altar and putting our money in the collection used to appease Boras and those he serves and serve him.  Last, I'd still rather have Lee in LF and Huff at 3B if they can get the two combined for roughly the same money.  And anyone crazy enough to think NY will have to pick up any money in a trade puts too much value in the NY media.  All I say to that notion is 2005 AL MVP.  If NY has to throw in money in any deal, Cashman deserves to be fired.

ETA: in other words, and I hate to say this, I agree with Pinwheel.  However, I should probably date and post the link to the article because by the end of the playoffs,Pinwheel will be professing that A-Rod is be key to the Astros offseason plan/success.


Grab another Coke and let's die

CarolinaStro

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 284
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #27 on: October 09, 2006, 05:09:32 pm »
You guys are being awful rough (ARod is worse to team than Bonds?) on a 1st ballot HOFer who still has a decade of ball left in him.  His contract is definitely a burden for him.  Is he a potential distraction in Houston?  Sure, but so is Clemens.  ARod contributed to very strong offenses in both Texas and NY as he would in Houston.  The playoff performance is BS.  Under that logic, we should have run Bags and Biggio out of town a long time ago.  Pitching and timely hitting wins in the playoffs.  The media punishes him because of the $252 million and I am not feeling sorry for him because it comes with the territory but I would root for him in the mud-n-blood (especially in Alkie's scenario for Morgan, Lidge, and Buchholz).

CarolinaStro

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 284
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #28 on: October 09, 2006, 05:23:10 pm »
"A-Rod may be the kind of guy Tim Purpura would want, but I'm guessing the best GMs--Billy Beane, Gerry Hunsicker, Pat Gillick, etc.--wouldn't touch him."

Damn, what is the dig on Purp all about?  The prick compares ARod to T.O.?  Give me a break.  Nobody compares to Owens. Not Bonds, not Moss, not Artest, and sure as hell not ARod.

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #29 on: October 09, 2006, 05:41:40 pm »
Quote:

"A-Rod may be the kind of guy Tim Purpura would want, but I'm guessing the best GMs--Billy Beane, Gerry Hunsicker, Pat Gillick, etc.--wouldn't touch him."

Damn, what is the dig on Purp all about?  The prick compares ARod to T.O.?  Give me a break.  Nobody compares to Owens. Not Bonds, not Moss, not Artest, and sure as hell not ARod.





Beane signed Milton Bradley last season.  Hunsicker was the GM when the Astros signed Jeff Kent, and Pat Gillick insisted Brett Myers pitch the day after he was arrested for assaulting his wife (wife has refused to cooperate an the charges have been dropped) these guys aren't squeamish.

Browneye

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 316
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #30 on: October 09, 2006, 09:22:54 pm »
I think in any other clubhouse he may be a distraction, but not in the Astros. Atleast not for what he is a distraction for in New York. Yeah, so he isnt a big community guy, well thats not for you and me to judge. I cant think of a game I went to see just because we had a star community guy playing.

In New York he was a distraction for being in a slump and not fitting in with a bunch of premo's.  I just love the bitchin Giambi was doing. Like this idiot has room to complain about anybody. That guy is a distraction.

If Clemons can be there or not be there when he is getting paid 22 mil, than who is complaining about a guy who would NOT be getting paid the most, well, atleast not from Drayton.

No matter how you cut it, ARod would be a great bat in this lineup and he is a proven hitter year after year. I'll take him and take my chances.
"Do not rejoice in his defeat, you men. For though the world has stood up and stopped the bastard, the bitch that bore him is in heat again."

Bob Sakamano

  • Disappointing Rookie
  • Posts: 82
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #31 on: October 09, 2006, 10:32:22 pm »
Here's a quality case for A-Rod... with a large sampling of Richard Justice bashing to go along with it. A good read.

The Link

Hilarious stuff.

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #32 on: October 09, 2006, 11:34:37 pm »
Quote:

Here's a quality case for A-Rod... with a large sampling of Richard Justice bashing to go along with it. A good read.

The Link

Hilarious stuff.





The thing about Justice is that his "facts" are low hanging fruit.  What is dizzying is keeping up with his pinwheels.  In general, this guy needs to ease up offa Everett.  Adam Everett does the other half of baseball, the keeping the runs from scoring half, so that he makes Jeter look like he's wearing culottes.  It's not me saying this, there's a whole book. But this part is high larious, "I do actually think the Astros should sign Terrell Owens."  Great.  What's his Eqa? If it's good, they might could use him.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #33 on: October 10, 2006, 10:43:17 am »
my best source says the Yankees will move ARod for the right deal.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #34 on: October 10, 2006, 11:01:17 am »
The Astros would probably move Oswalt or Berkman, too, for the right deal.  But I don't think any of us are ready to stomach the Yankee's idea of an A-Rod "right deal".  In fact, it probably involves Oswalt or Berkman.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

toddthebod

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3385
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #35 on: October 10, 2006, 11:03:37 am »
Is your source the New York tabloids or does your source just listen to WFAN?  Everyone believes that the Yankees will move A-Rod, particularly if the Yankees decide to keep Torre around.  But it doesn't make a difference if the Yankees want to move A-Rod since he has a no-trade clause in his contract.  And to this point, A-Rod has said nothing to indicate that he wants to be traded despite the way he is treated by the fans.
Boom!

Froback

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2253
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #36 on: October 10, 2006, 11:15:08 am »
Quote:

But it doesn't make a difference if the Yankees want to move A-Rod since he has a no-trade clause in his contract.  And to this point, A-Rod has said nothing to indicate that he wants to be traded despite the way he is treated by the fans.



I don't have any inside info, but just an observation: Your teammates don't like you (as indicated by Giambi), you management wants to trade you (if you are asked to waive your no-trade)... why would you want to stay since it has ZERO impact on your earnings (since A-Rod isn't a huge marketing tool in NY).

My concern is if A-Rod is on the market, what would it take to get him.  There is a difference between a team making a player available and a team trying to move someone.

If the asking price isn't too outrageous, I would love to add A-Rod to the team, but if you even sniff at trying to get Roy or Lance, see ya!  A-Rod is NOT a leader and thus the team needs to keep their leaders if they can.

I would be highly dissappointed if the Astros Brass didn't at least contact the Yanks about what it would take to get A-Rod, given all the speculation.

But then I still believe the Astros will do 2 splash moves this off-season. One will be signing Carlos Lee.  Seems to perfect a fit not to.  The other is an unknown trade involving either a marquee type player or lots of players (or both).  The last one is just a feeling I have, again based on ZERO inside info.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #37 on: October 10, 2006, 11:36:36 am »
Not that this is reliable information, but I was listening to 790 on my way home from work last night, and Charlie Palillo stated that he thought the Astros were going to be a major player for Soriano, and that Lee was a "secondary target."  That made me scratch my head a little.  Is Soriano equipped to play right field?

I guess he could be a center fielder with some practice, since he's fast, but he seems too sloppy to be a good defensive player at any position.

Quote:

Quote:

But it doesn't make a difference if the Yankees want to move A-Rod since he has a no-trade clause in his contract.  And to this point, A-Rod has said nothing to indicate that he wants to be traded despite the way he is treated by the fans.



I don't have any inside info, but just an observation: Your teammates don't like you (as indicated by Giambi), you management wants to trade you (if you are asked to waive your no-trade)... why would you want to stay since it has ZERO impact on your earnings (since A-Rod isn't a huge marketing tool in NY).

My concern is if A-Rod is on the market, what would it take to get him.  There is a difference between a team making a player available and a team trying to move someone.

If the asking price isn't too outrageous, I would love to add A-Rod to the team, but if you even sniff at trying to get Roy or Lance, see ya!  A-Rod is NOT a leader and thus the team needs to keep their leaders if they can.

I would be highly dissappointed if the Astros Brass didn't at least contact the Yanks about what it would take to get A-Rod, given all the speculation.

But then I still believe the Astros will do 2 splash moves this off-season. One will be signing Carlos Lee.  Seems to perfect a fit not to.  The other is an unknown trade involving either a marquee type player or lots of players (or both).  The last one is just a feeling I have, again based on ZERO inside info.



Grab another Coke and let's die

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #38 on: October 10, 2006, 11:43:46 am »
Quote:

on the field, the guy is a beast... so why do teams seem so eager to get rid of him? i mean, the yankees are coming off a disappointing year.... and they want (maybe) want to jettison the guy who won an MVP last year? clue phone's ringing....




This is the same organization that decided that Jeter was a better defensive SS than ARod.  Clue phone rings there, too.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #39 on: October 10, 2006, 11:44:57 am »
 
Quote:

Not that this is reliable information, but I was listening to 790 on my way home from work last night, and Charlie Palillo stated that he thought the Astros were going to be a major player for Soriano, and that Lee was a "secondary target." That made me scratch my head a little. Is Soriano equipped to play right field?

I guess he could be a center fielder with some practice, since he's fast, but he seems too sloppy to be a good defensive player at any position.




Are you saying Carlos Lee is equipped to play RF? I was assuming Scott would be the lesser of two evils there.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

Arky Vaughan

  • Administrator
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6335
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #40 on: October 10, 2006, 11:50:09 am »
Quote:

This is the same organization that decided that Jeter was a better defensive SS than ARod.  Clue phone rings there, too.




Is that the decision they made, or did they decide that they weren't going to ask their team captain and fan favorite to another position to accomodate a newcomer?

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #41 on: October 10, 2006, 11:52:08 am »
Quote:

Quote:

This is the same organization that decided that Jeter was a better defensive SS than ARod.  Clue phone rings there, too.




Is that the decision they made, or did they decide that they weren't going to ask their team captain and fan favorite to another position to accomodate a newcomer?





It's both.  And it speaks volumes about why Arod doesn't "fit in".
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #42 on: October 10, 2006, 12:17:56 pm »
Yeah, Jeter could have moved to second base, but he wanted to play the glamour position-or the organization was afraid to ask him.

Here's an interesting take  from Yankee hater Jim Caple.  He makes a lot of great points on why A-Rod is more valuable to the Yankees than Derek Jeter.

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

This is the same organization that decided that Jeter was a better defensive SS than ARod.  Clue phone rings there, too.




Is that the decision they made, or did they decide that they weren't going to ask their team captain and fan favorite to another position to accomodate a newcomer?




It's both.  And it speaks volumes about why Arod doesn't "fit in".
Grab another Coke and let's die

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #43 on: October 10, 2006, 01:23:30 pm »
my source is inside baseball, wiseass, and he negotiates trades for his team. believe what you want.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Arky Vaughan

  • Administrator
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6335
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #44 on: October 10, 2006, 01:29:31 pm »
Quote:

If the asking price isn't too outrageous, I would love to add A-Rod to the team, but if you even sniff at trying to get Roy or Lance, see ya!  A-Rod is NOT a leader and thus the team needs to keep their leaders if they can.




Don't Berkman and Oswalt have no-trade clauses?

Froback

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2253
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #45 on: October 10, 2006, 03:03:39 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

If the asking price isn't too outrageous, I would love to add A-Rod to the team, but if you even sniff at trying to get Roy or Lance, see ya!  A-Rod is NOT a leader and thus the team needs to keep their leaders if they can.




Don't Berkman and Oswalt have no-trade clauses?



I want to say one does and the other doesn't... But I honestly don't know for sure.  Going to look it up now though.

Edited: Yep, both have full no trade clauses.

utastro

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 888
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #46 on: October 10, 2006, 03:22:41 pm »
Quote:

my source is inside baseball, wiseass, and he negotiates trades for his team. believe what you want.




When can trade discussions commence?  After the World Series?
Oh God, I wish I was a loofah!

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #47 on: October 10, 2006, 03:28:00 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

my source is inside baseball, wiseass, and he negotiates trades for his team. believe what you want.




When can trade discussions commence?  After the World Series?





I think discussions can happen at any time. But there is a MLB-imposed moratorium on public announcements during the World Series.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

S.P. Rodriguez

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2932
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #48 on: October 10, 2006, 04:08:41 pm »
For what it's worth, this release should change absolutely nothing about the A-Rod speculation.   Story
"If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed."

"If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you; that is the principal difference between a dog and a man. "

-Mark Twain

CarolinaStro

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 284
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #49 on: October 10, 2006, 04:41:49 pm »
Quote:

For what it's worth, this release should change absolutely nothing about the A-Rod speculation.   Story




Good move by George.  Of course, it will be win it all or see ya for sure next year.  All the Yankees "experts" said Torre staying over Lou would expediete ARod's departure.  The general odds being babbled about at Yankee/baseball sites for ARod trading partner are:
 1. LA Angels (Weaver,Santana, boatload of prospects to offer)
 2. LA Dodgers (strong MLB ready prospects)
 3. Cubbies (Prior...he could join Pavano in the training room)
 4. Padres
 5. Some team from Texas

Of course it all means nothing at the moment.  I would like to see him end up in KC or TB just for laughs.  He would make up about 98% of each team's payroll.

Arky Vaughan

  • Administrator
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6335
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #50 on: October 10, 2006, 05:24:56 pm »
Quote:

For what it's worth, this release should change absolutely nothing about the A-Rod speculation.   Story




Thanks. I was very concerned until you assured me otherwise. Who is your source?

toddthebod

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3385
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #51 on: October 10, 2006, 05:49:12 pm »
Jim.  I believe your source.  He's just not really giving you earth-shattering information this time.
Boom!

S.P. Rodriguez

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2932
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #52 on: October 10, 2006, 06:54:44 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

For what it's worth, this release should change absolutely nothing about the A-Rod speculation.   Story




Thanks. I was very concerned until you assured me otherwise. Who is your source?





Source schmource... I go with my gut.  

Seriously, in the event my post was misunderstood, that statement was meant to directly address all those who said that either A-Rod or Torre would be gone.  Now that Torre is staying, the debate around A-Rod will rage on, no matter , or maybe as as a result of, what the pundits say.  Personally, I don't think he's going anywhere unless, as Jim relayed, the right deal comes along.  That said, for the right deal, I think any player is available.  That offers no insight into the probability that said player will actually be traded.  

Jim, please keep the info coming.  It makes the off-season just a little more enjoyable, for me at least.
"If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed."

"If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you; that is the principal difference between a dog and a man. "

-Mark Twain

Browneye

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 316
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #53 on: October 10, 2006, 07:15:39 pm »
I agree with Tom... Jim, you should give ole Buford T a call. He could use some help with reliable sources.
"Do not rejoice in his defeat, you men. For though the world has stood up and stopped the bastard, the bitch that bore him is in heat again."

DVauthrin

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2929
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #54 on: October 10, 2006, 08:03:30 pm »
The whole reason we are having this conversation is because of the idiotic group think that is new york yankee fans/ local media.   If they just left A-Rod alone, he would perform better, but instead every time he messes up, they boo or have the worst media in the world write nasty/controversial articles about why A-Rod had an off night.  But they don't do that towards Jeter or Posada, etc.

A-Rod could break the homerun record, win another MVP, and if they didn't win the WS, they would demand his head on a silver platter.    It's ridiculous.   They don't deserve what they receive every year in terms of putting a good baseball team on the field.   If I was a player, I wouldn't want to play there.   Consider the treatment of Joe Torre.  He has 4 WS rings, and has made the postseason for the past decade, yet his head was almost on the chopping block.   Give me a break.   Your team lost because your bullpen outside of Rivera blows, and your starting pitching was slightly above average at best, George.  Not because Joe Torre pushed wrong buttons.

And Derek Jeter is most overrated player in baseball today, and perhaps ever.
Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted.

DVauthrin

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2929
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #55 on: October 10, 2006, 08:03:33 pm »
The whole reason we are having this conversation is because of the idiotic group think that is new york yankee fans/ local media.   If they just left A-Rod alone, he would perform better, but instead every time he messes up, they boo or have the worst media in the world write nasty/controversial articles about why A-Rod had an off night.  But they don't do that towards Jeter or Posada, etc.

A-Rod could break the homerun record, win another MVP, and if they didn't win the WS, they would demand his head on a silver platter.    It's ridiculous.   They don't deserve what they receive every year in terms of putting a good baseball team on the field.   If I was a player, I wouldn't want to play there.   Consider the treatment of Joe Torre.  He has 4 WS rings, and has made the postseason for the past decade, yet his head was almost on the chopping block.   Give me a break.   Your team lost because your bullpen outside of Rivera blows, and your starting pitching was slightly above average at best, George.  Not because Joe Torre pushed wrong buttons.

And Derek Jeter is most overrated player in baseball today, and perhaps ever.   I agree if he just steps up and tells the fans/press, lay off Rodriguez, it makes the situation much easier/better.   Furthermore, it's a joke that he might win AL MVP this year.  His numbers do not match up to Morneau or Ortiz.

I'm sick of the whole yankee fan mentality, which is it is our birthright to play/win world series.   That attitude, the unbalanced media coverage towards the yankees and steinbrenner's spending is part of what is wrong with baseball.

The yankee fans don't really deserve to have a great player like A-Rod to cheer for with the way they act towards him.   And I'd trade/welcome him as an Astro in a heartbeat, and it would be best for A-Rod to leave NY imho.
Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted.

homer

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6509
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #56 on: October 10, 2006, 08:31:27 pm »
 
Quote:

Consider the treatment of Joe Torre. He has 4 WS rings, and has made the postseason for the past decade, yet his head was almost on the chopping block.




From the Steinbrenner's statement in the article above, Joe's head is still on the chopping block. It seems pretty clear that anything less than a WS championship will find Joe out on the street. That is some immense pressure... Especially considering the Joe is hardly in control of his own destiny. If Cashman/Steinbrenner don't give him quality pitching next year then he is going to have a hard time living up to expectations.

Why isn't/wasn't Cashman the target of this criticism. Why isn't he out the door? Or being threatened? He is the one most responsible (besides Steinbrenner) for not providing adequate pitching. He is the one that signed Farnsworth to an unbelievable and undeserved contract.
Oye. Vamos, vamos.

DVauthrin

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2929
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #57 on: October 10, 2006, 09:00:46 pm »
Don't forget about the Jaret Wright signing. You could add pavano as well, but he got hurt as soon as he arrived there.  And, I think Mike Greenberg said it well this morning on mike/mike when he said just picture what happens next year if the yankees go on a long losing streak.   The calls for piniella or somebody else will be loud esp considering torre is in a lame duck position.
Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted.

Outlawscotty

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 932
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #58 on: October 10, 2006, 11:44:25 pm »
It is simply amazing what the fans in the NY area expect.  Yesterday on XM (Charlie Steiner I think,) there was a female caller who claimed to go to several/many Yankee games a year and couldn't string together two sentences fo a reason as to why Torre/A-Rod should stay or go.  She was obviously upset, but obviously had NO clue as to what she was talking about.  The scoreboard/trophy case was her guide.  Spoiled fans--spoiled city.  Winning championships is the ultimate goal for most teams, but the standard for the Yankmees.  Steinbrenner would be a fool to part with either piece in question, regardless of what the 'die-hards' think.  The talent pool that is free agency is very shallow as well as their minor league affiliates (I assume.)  The time is approaching when there will be very few players that will deal with Steinbrenner, the media spotlight, the overwhelming expectations, and the un-forgiving fans in the Bronx market.  Other teams will use this fodder to  keep  their players much to the NY'ers shagrin.  Maybe I'm wrong, but with A-Rod guaranteed his salary for the next however many years, he wouldn't mind playing somewhere besides the pressure cooker in NY.  If not, his ego outweighs his pride.

Outlawscotty

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 932
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #59 on: October 11, 2006, 12:31:59 am »
Quote:

For what it's worth, this release should change absolutely nothing about the A-Rod speculation.   Story




By god this should....

 Pinwheel at his best

Unbelieveable.

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #60 on: October 11, 2006, 12:47:53 am »
Quote:

Quote:

For what it's worth, this release should change absolutely nothing about the A-Rod speculation.   Story




By god this should....

 Pinwheel at his best

Unbelieveable.





Here's what puzzles me, he types "You think I'm an idiot for not wanting to bring him to the Astros".  Oh, honey, we think you're an idiot for so many reasons besides that.

Outlawscotty

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 932
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #61 on: October 11, 2006, 12:55:07 am »
Quote:

Oh, honey, we think you're an idiot for so many reasons besides that.




Funny thing is, he has his  new  medium to spew and he uses it.  But when someone, or anyone for that matter, calls him out, he can't handle it.  Stick to ESPN or the Comical if you don't want to hear criticism, idiot.

seib22

  • Roster Filler
  • Posts: 202
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #62 on: October 11, 2006, 12:25:47 pm »
Quote:

The whole reason we are having this conversation is because of the idiotic group think that is new york yankee fans/ local media.   If they just left A-Rod alone, he would perform better, but instead every time he messes up, they boo or have the worst media in the world write nasty/controversial articles about why A-Rod had an off night.  But they don't do that towards Jeter or Posada, etc.

A-Rod could break the homerun record, win another MVP, and if they didn't win the WS, they would demand his head on a silver platter.    It's ridiculous.   They don't deserve what they receive every year in terms of putting a good baseball team on the field.   If I was a player, I wouldn't want to play there.   Consider the treatment of Joe Torre.  He has 4 WS rings, and has made the postseason for the past decade, yet his head was almost on the chopping block.   Give me a break.   Your team lost because your bullpen outside of Rivera blows, and your starting pitching was slightly above average at best, George.  Not because Joe Torre pushed wrong buttons.

And Derek Jeter is most overrated player in baseball today, and perhaps ever.   I agree if he just steps up and tells the fans/press, lay off Rodriguez, it makes the situation much easier/better.   Furthermore, it's a joke that he might win AL MVP this year.  His numbers do not match up to Morneau or Ortiz.

I'm sick of the whole yankee fan mentality, which is it is our birthright to play/win world series.   That attitude, the unbalanced media coverage towards the yankees and steinbrenner's spending is part of what is wrong with baseball.

The yankee fans don't really deserve to have a great player like A-Rod to cheer for with the way they act towards him.   And I'd trade/welcome him as an Astro in a heartbeat, and it would be best for A-Rod to leave NY imho.






oh please...Jeter is not even the best player on his team. You could even argue that...wait for it...Arod should win the MVP over Jeter.  Jeter hit .343 this year, which is the only reason, imo that he's even in the discussion.

HPFRic

  • Roster Filler
  • Posts: 159
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #63 on: October 11, 2006, 12:34:27 pm »
Quote:

oh please...Jeter is not even the best player on his team. You could even argue that...wait for it...Arod should win the MVP over Jeter.  Jeter hit .343 this year, which is the only reason, imo that he's even in the discussion.



you're probably right; but therein lies my issue with arod - why would the yanks even entertain the thought of dealing him?

4 years. 2 mvps. (potentially) 3 teams.

i lived in dallas during the arod era; there is just... something off about the guy. i can't put my finger on it. his numbers are overwhelming, but...... if you were there, you know what i mean. he was like a ghost.

and now he may be traded for the second time in four years.

strosrays

  • Guest
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #64 on: October 11, 2006, 01:34:28 pm »
Quote:

The whole reason we are having this conversation is because of the idiotic group think that is new york yankee fans/ local media.   If they just left A-Rod alone, he would perform better, but instead every time he messes up, they boo or have the worst media in the world write nasty/controversial articles about why A-Rod had an off night... I'm sick of the whole yankee fan mentality, which is it is our birthright to play/win world series.   That attitude, the unbalanced media coverage towards the yankees and steinbrenner's spending is part of what is wrong with baseball.






The brainwave-less groupthinkers are a percentage of Yankee fans, yes, but I doubt a much higher percentage than most anywhere else.  There are just more of them, in total.  And more media sources in NYC to fan the flames that draw in the sports radio call-in moths.

Picture a place with 100 Justices, and a couple million Howard-in-Memorials.

I've said it before, but my forays into Yankee Stadium have always been enjoyable because the majority of the fans there I talked to, just randomly sitting around me, knew their baseball (I won't make comparisons to those in MMPUS.)  You just never hear those guys over all the babble.



Quote:

The yankee fans don't really deserve to have a great player like A-Rod to cheer for with the way they act towards him.   And I'd trade/welcome him as an Astro in a heartbeat, and it would be best for A-Rod to leave NY imho.





For years when they played together, every year seemingly, there was a loud fan/media drumbeat in Houston to trade Biggio and/or Bagwell away, because they "choked" in the playoffs.  The way NY fans act toward A-Rod can't any stupider than that was.


Quote:

And Derek Jeter is most overrated player in baseball today, and perhaps ever...  it's a joke that he might win AL MVP this year.  His numbers do not match up to Morneau or Ortiz.





First of all, while you do not state your criteria, I don't see where Jeter's numbers pale in comparison; and second, you are comparing an everyday shortstop here to a couple of DH/1B types, BTW who both play in parks more offense-friendly than Jeter does.

Maybe his defense has been 'only' average - that's the most common actual complaint I hear about him - but he appears to be adequate, at the least; meantime Jeter is one of the best offensive shortstops of this era or any other.  He hits for average and power.  He can run, and steals a lot and at an exceptional percentage (34 of 39 this season, about an 80% success rate for his career.)  He gets on base, draws walks.  He scores runs, well over 100 every season, save for 2003, when he missed a quarter of the year with a shoulder injury (he would've scored 115 or so that season, about his average, otherwise.)  Aside from 2003, he has been very durable - he is out there practically every day.  Career-wise, he has an good shot at 2,500 games played, 3,000 hits, 1,800 runs scored, a lifetime .300+ average, 250-300 HRs, 350-400 SBs, depending on how long he wants to play.

And he cannot take all the credit, but there are the four World Championships.

He has done all this playing a demanding position, day after day, in the most media-heavy market in baseball, on a team whose owner and fans, as it has been pointed out, expect nothing less than top drawer performance, year after year after year; and all of this in a town that has emotionally dismantled several players more veteran and mature than Jeter was when he got there.

Personally, I think he has been a remarkable player; but even conceding I may be overstating that, how the fuck is Jeter overrated, now or ever?

Froback

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2253
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #65 on: October 11, 2006, 03:59:14 pm »
Quote:

Personally, I think he has been a remarkable player; but even conceding I may be overstating that, how the fuck is Jeter overrated, now or ever?



He plays in NY, and everything there is over-rated (good and bad).

The reality is, he is touted as the best SS of his ERA.  And I have serious issues with that, because I think A-Rod is better.  His numbers are undeniable though.  He is and will be in the HOF.  And not just because of NE bias.  He will deserve to be there.

DVauthrin

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2929
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #66 on: October 11, 2006, 11:04:13 pm »
1) There is a distinct difference between that treatment and the way A-Rod is treated.   It's not just the postseason with A-Rod.  If he makes an error, they boo.  If he goes 0-4, they boo.   If jeter does those things, it's he's Derek Jeter, worlds greatest shortstop, he deserves the benefit of the doubt to work his way out of it.  When Giambi first signed in NY, he got the A-Rod treatment the first month while in NY.   He started hitting and they stopped.   But even though A-Rod hits, they don't stop.  They expect perfection from the 252 million dollar man.   Every night, and if they don't get it, the fans complain and the media writes scathing articles in return.

2)  David Ortiz vs Derek Jeter

BA: .287 vs .343=jeter
HR:  54 vs 14=ortiz
runs: 115 vs 118=wash, you have to consider where they bat in the order
RBI:  137 vs 97=ortiz, but it's closer than the numbers indicate because he bats 3rd to jeter's 2nd
OBP:  .413 vs .417=essentially another wash
SLG:  .636 vs .483=ortiz in a landslide

Does jeter playing in the field at an average level or so and a .343 BA plus 34 steals  take away a 40 hr gap and almost 150 points in SLG percentage, along with ortiz's slight advantage in rbi.  Not to me it doesn't.  I know people will point to one made the playoffs the other didn't, but I don't feel mvp's should only go to players on playoff teams.  

If you do Jeter vs Morneau

BA: .343 to .321=jeter
runs: 118 to 97=jeter(this wipes out morneau's rbi advantage because of where they bat in their orders)
HR:  14 to 34=morneau
RBI: 97 to 130=slight edge morneau considering batting order spot
OBP:  .417 vs .375=jeter
SLG:  .483 vs .559=morneau
SB'S: 34 to 3=jeter

If you take away steals it's a dead heat between morneau and Jeter.  But what usually has people voting for jeter is how he kept the yankees together when Matsui and Sheffield got hurt.   Without Justin Morneau think about where the twins offense would be.   And as I stated in my predictions, I would vote for Ortiz as AL MVP, and it's not really close in my mind.

3)  Listen to a FOX or ESPN broadcast of a yankees game, Derek Jeter is bulletproof.  He can do no wrong.   When he makes an error, it was somebody else's fault, when he gets on virtue of an error, it was his hustle that forced the error.   And let's not forget if he is mr. intangible/mr.october than why doesn't he take the heat for the yankee postseason failure right now.   If he is the team leader than why isn't it ever on him?   Let's also not forget than A-Rod was the better player at SS when he was traded to new york but jeter demanded to stay at the position.   You can be a good player, which jeter is, and be completely overrated.   People actually think the guy is the best player in MLB.   It's just laughable.   He's an average to below average defensive shortstop with 20-25 hr power who hits for a high average and can steal bases. And that is worthy of the best player status? Please.
Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted.

homer

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6509
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About A-Rod
« Reply #67 on: October 13, 2006, 01:27:43 am »
 
Quote:

In general, this guy needs to ease up offa Everett.




He got smart a little later:

The Link

It starts off:

 
Quote:

My whipping boy in this post, Adam Everett, is absolutely adored by the fielding evaluation system Baseball Prospectus uses...


Oye. Vamos, vamos.

S.P. Rodriguez

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2932
    • View Profile
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About Soriano
« Reply #68 on: October 13, 2006, 10:43:16 am »
Read this  article  this morning and something caught my attention.

"Soriano's agent, Diego Bentz,...."

I thought Soriano was represented by Boras?

ETA: Not sure why I thought that but Soriano is not on this  list.
 
"If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed."

"If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you; that is the principal difference between a dog and a man. "

-Mark Twain

das

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3465
    • View Profile
    • Faith Home Ministries
Re: Ok, Let's Talk About Soriano
« Reply #69 on: October 13, 2006, 10:46:51 am »
Nope.  It's that Bentz guy.  I sat next to him at RFK earlier in the year.  Pretty funny guy.  He got up and left in the 6th inning though.
Another trenchant comment by a jealous lesser intellect.