Author Topic: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"  (Read 11247 times)

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« on: May 05, 2006, 11:34:54 am »
From NYCU:

 
Quote:

"We were trying to bury that pitch in the dirt. We missed a couple spots early, so I wasn't happy about it.




Next thing you know, he's going to be demanding his own resin bag. Disturbing trend.
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2006, 11:38:29 am »
Quote:

From NYCU:

 
Quote:

"We were trying to bury that pitch in the dirt. We missed a couple spots early, so I wasn't happy about it.




Next thing you know, he's going to be demanding his own resin bag. Disturbing trend.





Ausmus + pitcher?  "We" is logical.

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2006, 11:39:32 am »
How is Ausmus involved in missing the spots?

P.S. It was a joke.
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2006, 11:41:29 am »
Quote:

How is Ausmus involved in missing the spots?

P.S. It was a joke.





Ausmus is very much involved with the performance of the pitcher.  After he came out and "talked" with Pettitte, he started hitting his spots.

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2006, 11:45:21 am »
Quote:

Quote:

How is Ausmus involved in missing the spots?

P.S. It was a joke.





Ausmus is very much involved with the performance of the pitcher.  After he came out and "talked" with Pettitte, he started hitting his spots.





Isn't the point of the "we" discussions the fact that we (fans) aren't part of the team or organization?  Ausmus is clearly part of the "we."  

Just a really bad "joke" by Biz.  Really bad.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2006, 11:48:33 am »
He's clearly a part of the "we" for the organization BudGirl. Try and keep up. I don't think he's part of the "we" for missing spots on pitches, despite Pravata's tortuous attempts at making it so.

If a golfer has a bad day, does his swing coach say "Yah, we really struggled out there?"
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #6 on: May 05, 2006, 11:49:41 am »
Quote:

If a golfer has a bad day, does his swing coach say "Yah, we really struggled out there?"



Nope.  But his caddie might.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #7 on: May 05, 2006, 11:50:49 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

How is Ausmus involved in missing the spots?

P.S. It was a joke.





Ausmus is very much involved with the performance of the pitcher.  After he came out and "talked" with Pettitte, he started hitting his spots.




Isn't the point of the "we" discussions the fact that we (fans) aren't part of the team or organization?  Ausmus is clearly part of the "we."  

Just a really bad "joke" by Biz.  Really bad.




Right, BZ finds it impossible to understand the two points in this post, the relationship between catcher and pitcher and the psychosis of the use of "we".

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #8 on: May 05, 2006, 11:51:20 am »
Quote:

He's clearly a part of the "we" for the organization BudGirl. Try and keep up. I don't think he's part of the "we" for missing spots on pitches, despite Pravata's tortuous attempts at making it so.

If a golfer has a bad day, does his swing coach say "Yah, we really struggled out there?"





Your joke was stupid.  This metaphor is way off.  You're 0 for 2.  Ausmus is part of every pitch made.  The "we" is accurate.
Goin' for a bus ride.

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #9 on: May 05, 2006, 11:51:49 am »
Quote:

He's clearly a part of the "we" for the organization BudGirl. Try and keep up. I don't think he's part of the "we" for missing spots on pitches, despite Pravata's tortuous attempts at making it so.

If a golfer has a bad day, does his swing coach say "Yah, we really struggled out there?"





Why you feel the need to continue to show that you are an asshole is beyond me.

He is part of the "we" in regard to pitching, especially when he is on the other end of the pitch.

Golf, last I checked isn't a team sport bad comparison.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #10 on: May 05, 2006, 11:52:37 am »
I understand the psychosis between the pitcher and the catcher fine. Even thought I don't really use the "we", I haven't seen any evidence for any "psychosis" related specifically to it. Well, unless you want to apply that term to your reaction to "we".
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #11 on: May 05, 2006, 11:54:03 am »
Quote:

I don't think he's part of the "we" for missing spots on pitches




Of course you don't.  That's not surprising in the least.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #12 on: May 05, 2006, 11:55:32 am »
Do "we" really need to go through this again?
Grab another Coke and let's die

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #13 on: May 05, 2006, 11:57:24 am »
Quote:

Quote:

I don't think he's part of the "we" for missing spots on pitches




Of course you don't.  That's not surprising in the least.




Oh please. It's obvious why Ausmus said it - it sounds a lot better than "Andy was missing his spots so I set him straight." Save your torturous logic for why he would say "we" otherwise.

Edit: And of course there's nothing wrong with him talking this way. It's better than him telling the media that Andy was messing up. I don't get why you have to go through all this bullshit to say that.
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #14 on: May 05, 2006, 11:59:37 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I don't think he's part of the "we" for missing spots on pitches




Of course you don't.  That's not surprising in the least.




Oh please. It's obvious why Ausmus said it - it sounds a lot better than "Andy was missing his spots so I set him straight." Save your torturous logic for why he would say "we" otherwise.

Edit: And of course there's nothing wrong with him talking this way. It's better than him telling the media that Andy was messing up. I don't get why you have to go through all this bullshit to say that.




Just wondering, have you ever been wrong and admitted it?
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #15 on: May 05, 2006, 12:00:20 pm »
Quote:

Do "we" really need to go through this again?



I know a sure-fire way to get this thread nuked.  Want me to start?
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #16 on: May 05, 2006, 12:01:21 pm »
All the time. I admitted I was wrong about the now infamous "You have to wonder..." quote, for example. I admitted I was way wrong about my first post to OWA (Biggio to Catcher). I actually have no problem with it all, unless I'm right.
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #17 on: May 05, 2006, 12:01:43 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Do "we" really need to go through this again?



I know a sure-fire way to get this thread nuked.  Want me to start?





Yes.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

OldBlevins

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 633
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #18 on: May 05, 2006, 12:02:51 pm »
Hey, at least he didn't talk about himself in the third person.
blah, blah, blah . . .

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #19 on: May 05, 2006, 12:03:37 pm »
Quote:

Do "we" really need to go through this again?




Please - This thread was intended solely for amusement (because Ausmus statement is on the surface a bit weird). Going through this again, as you put it, is a combination of Pravata's kneejerk reaction to the "we" stuff, BudGirl's knee-jerk reaction to anything about Ausmus, plus a healthy helping of a general knee-jerk to anything I post (WFW).
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

Tralfaz

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2223
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #20 on: May 05, 2006, 12:06:32 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Do "we" really need to go through this again?



I know a sure-fire way to get this thread nuked.  Want me to start?




Yes.




Oui, Oui!
RO RASROS!

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #21 on: May 05, 2006, 12:07:39 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Do "we" really need to go through this again?




Please - This thread was intended solely for amusement (because Ausmus statement is on the surface a bit weird). Going through this again, as you put it, is a combination of Pravata's kneejerk reaction to the "we" stuff, BudGirl's knee-jerk reaction to anything about Ausmus, plus a healthy helping of a general knee-jerk to anything I post (WFW).





Your joke was lame.  My reaction was due to the bad/lame joke.  Not the Ausmus reference.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #22 on: May 05, 2006, 12:08:23 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Do "we" really need to go through this again?




Please - This thread was intended solely for amusement (because Ausmus statement is on the surface a bit weird). Going through this again, as you put it, is a combination of Pravata's kneejerk reaction to the "we" stuff, BudGirl's knee-jerk reaction to anything about Ausmus, plus a healthy helping of a general knee-jerk to anything I post (WFW).




Your joke was lame.  My reaction was due to the bad/lame joke.  Not the Ausmus reference.




So what you wanted me to admit I was wrong about was that the joke was funny?
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #23 on: May 05, 2006, 12:08:43 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I don't think he's part of the "we" for missing spots on pitches




Of course you don't.  That's not surprising in the least.




Oh please. It's obvious why Ausmus said it - it sounds a lot better than "Andy was missing his spots so I set him straight." Save your torturous logic for why he would say "we" otherwise.

Edit: And of course there's nothing wrong with him talking this way. It's better than him telling the media that Andy was messing up. I don't get why you have to go through all this bullshit to say that.





Your arrogance is outdone only by your incredible dumbfuck ignorance.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #24 on: May 05, 2006, 12:11:27 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Do "we" really need to go through this again?




Please - This thread was intended solely for amusement (because Ausmus statement is on the surface a bit weird). Going through this again, as you put it, is a combination of Pravata's kneejerk reaction to the "we" stuff, BudGirl's knee-jerk reaction to anything about Ausmus, plus a healthy helping of a general knee-jerk to anything I post (WFW).





"Ausmus + pitcher? "We" is logical." Knee jerk?  No, this decision to embark on an extended description of your whiny ass was your idea.

davek

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #25 on: May 05, 2006, 12:24:58 pm »
Quote:

Please - This thread was intended solely for amusement (because Ausmus statement is on the surface a bit weird). Going through this again, as you put it, is a combination of Pravata's kneejerk reaction to the "we" stuff, BudGirl's knee-jerk reaction to anything about Ausmus, plus a healthy helping of a general knee-jerk to anything I post (WFW).




You ever think about why there's a "general knee-jerk" reaction to anything/everything you post?

Ever think "what" you post might have something to do with that?
"You wait for a strike then you knock the shit out of it."  Stan Musial

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #26 on: May 05, 2006, 12:42:06 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Do "we" really need to go through this again?



I know a sure-fire way to get this thread nuked.  Want me to start?





I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

davek

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #27 on: May 05, 2006, 12:45:58 pm »
Quote:

I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.




Orbit's gonna nuke the site?...

Had no idea the little fellow was so powerful...
"You wait for a strike then you knock the shit out of it."  Stan Musial

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #28 on: May 05, 2006, 12:52:18 pm »
Ausmus was wrong.  He should have said "I and I . . . "
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

No? in Austin

  • Guest
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #29 on: May 05, 2006, 12:56:00 pm »
Quote:

I don't get why you have to go through all this bullshit to say that.




Man rattles the cage of lion.  Lion takes a swipe at the man and tears his eyes out.  Man actually complains that he doesn't *get* why the lion took a swipe at him.

Hmmmmm....

BTW - the pitcher and catcher combination is called a "battery" for a reason.  It is a symbiotic relationship and using "we" is highly appropriate.  And if you think for one second that Andy's feelings were being spared by Ausmus, then you're just naive.

homer

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6509
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #30 on: May 05, 2006, 12:56:35 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Do "we" really need to go through this again?



I know a sure-fire way to get this thread nuked.  Want me to start?




I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.




Mostly...
Oye. Vamos, vamos.

Arky Vaughan

  • Administrator
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6335
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #31 on: May 05, 2006, 01:20:54 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Do "we" really need to go through this again?



I know a sure-fire way to get this thread nuked.  Want me to start?





If you're thinking what I think you're thinking, I'll oblige you.  Here, you take the first cut.

Zan

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 333
  • BU Webguy's friend
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #32 on: May 05, 2006, 02:20:34 pm »
Quote:

Do "we" really need to go through this again?




I like how Ensberg refered to the Texans as "we."

WulawHorn

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1484
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #33 on: May 05, 2006, 02:28:29 pm »
If Roy O throws a shutout next time out is it OK for Ausmus to say "we had our really good stuff today"?  I think that would sound weird like he was trying to horn in on Oswalt's gem, which is why I've never heard him say something like that in that situation.  Of course the pitcher will generally compliment the catcher on calling a good game- good targets etc.  I don't have a problem with ausmus use of the we aren't hitting our spots though.

My favorite is Biggio's constant use of the word we when speaking only about himself.  Love Craig's style of speaking, it cracks me up.  Definately want to ask him occasionally if he has a mouse in his pocket or somesuch.

No? in Austin

  • Guest
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #34 on: May 05, 2006, 03:00:32 pm »
Quote:

If Roy O throws a shutout next time out is it OK for Ausmus to say "we had our really good stuff today"?




But is that what he was saying in terms of Andy?  In your scenario, this is what he may say (given what he said with Andy) "We tried to throw more fastballs because he was locating the ball well.  We could've thrown more sliders and curves, but why should we?  The fastball was working, so we just went with it!"

Is *he* wrong?

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #35 on: May 05, 2006, 03:04:26 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

If Roy O throws a shutout next time out is it OK for Ausmus to say "we had our really good stuff today"?




But is that what he was saying in terms of Andy?  In your scenario, this is what he may say (given what he said with Andy) "We tried to throw more fastballs because he was locating the ball well.  We could've thrown more sliders and curves, but why should we?  The fastball was working, so we just went with it!"

Is *he* wrong?





That makes perfect sense, because everything you used we for he is part of. Notice your use of "he was locating the ball well." Seems pretty much exactly analagous to "he wasn't hitting the spots".
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

No? in Austin

  • Guest
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #36 on: May 05, 2006, 03:08:06 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

If Roy O throws a shutout next time out is it OK for Ausmus to say "we had our really good stuff today"?




But is that what he was saying in terms of Andy?  In your scenario, this is what he may say (given what he said with Andy) "We tried to throw more fastballs because he was locating the ball well.  We could've thrown more sliders and curves, but why should we?  The fastball was working, so we just went with it!"

Is *he* wrong?




That makes perfect sense, because everything you used we for he is part of. Notice your use of "he was locating the ball well." Seems pretty much exactly analagous to "he wasn't hitting the spots".




But since a catcher sets up where he wants the pitch to be *located*, could it be he was still correct.  And even if he wasn't, there is no way you can honestly sit there and type with any modicum of conviction, sincerity and even honesty that you believe he was trying to save Andy from questioning.

And if you're just joking around because you just want to waste time like we all do, then don't get so damn defensive about being told it was a piss poor attempt at humor/brilliance.  It was actually pathetic.

JackAstro

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3824
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #37 on: May 05, 2006, 03:30:12 pm »
Five favorite 'merican whiskeys (Bourbon, Tennessee, or otherwise):
1. Woodford Reserve
2. Maker's Mark
3. Jack Daniels (black)
4. Knob Creek
5. Bulleit

Three favorite things to do with them, when mixing:
1. Jack & Coke: Steady. A trusted pillar upon which to lean.
2. Old-fashioned: Shouldn't technically be ordered by anyone under the age of 80, but man... so good.
3. Orange Whiskey Sour: Perfect summer drink, kicks the hell out of a mint julep.
"We live in a society of laws. Why do you think I took you to all those Police Academy movies? For fun? Well, I didn't hear anybody laughing, did you?"
Say hi on the Twitter

No? in Austin

  • Guest
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #38 on: May 05, 2006, 03:31:43 pm »
Quote:

Five favorite 'merican whiskeys (Bourbon, Tennessee, or otherwise):
1. Woodford Reserve
2. Maker's Mark
3. Jack Daniels (black)
4. Knob Creek
5. Bulleit

Three favorite things to do with them, when mixing:
1. Jack & Coke: Steady. A trusted pillar upon which to lean.
2. Old-fashioned: Shouldn't technically be ordered by anyone under the age of 80, but man... so good.
3. Orange Whiskey Sour: Perfect summer drink, kicks the hell out of a mint julep.





Unfortunately, I don't drink hard liquor.  How about top five mexican food?

JackAstro

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3824
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #39 on: May 05, 2006, 03:33:45 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Five favorite 'merican whiskeys (Bourbon, Tennessee, or otherwise):
1. Woodford Reserve
2. Maker's Mark
3. Jack Daniels (black)
4. Knob Creek
5. Bulleit

Three favorite things to do with them, when mixing:
1. Jack & Coke: Steady. A trusted pillar upon which to lean.
2. Old-fashioned: Shouldn't technically be ordered by anyone under the age of 80, but man... so good.
3. Orange Whiskey Sour: Perfect summer drink, kicks the hell out of a mint julep.





Unfortunately, I don't drink hard liquor.  How about top five mexican food?





Absolutely. We can do both. Get us started...
"We live in a society of laws. Why do you think I took you to all those Police Academy movies? For fun? Well, I didn't hear anybody laughing, did you?"
Say hi on the Twitter

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #40 on: May 05, 2006, 03:33:55 pm »
You need early times and the julep on there - derby is saturday.
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

JackAstro

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3824
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #41 on: May 05, 2006, 03:39:07 pm »
Quote:

You need early times and the julep on there - derby is saturday.




Sorry - I'm probably in the minority, but I don't like any of those things. (Actually, just Early Times, mint juleps and the Kentucky Derby... I'm fine with Saturdays.)
"We live in a society of laws. Why do you think I took you to all those Police Academy movies? For fun? Well, I didn't hear anybody laughing, did you?"
Say hi on the Twitter

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #42 on: May 05, 2006, 03:46:30 pm »
Early Times is not choice, but it is drinkable (Mixes pretty well with rootbeer of all things, but I wouldn't choose it straight up or even with water really).

I haven't had a julep I liked, but I haven't had that many.

The derby is fun I think, but probably moreso with friends from kentucky (and my girlfriend's dad is a horse trainer, so I've gotten more into the races).

Saturdays are great, especially during the college football season.
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #43 on: May 05, 2006, 04:08:25 pm »
I don't drink enough bourbon to know one way or the other.  I don't drink much hard liquor generally, but how about top five hard liquors?  Here's a list:

1.  Boodles Gin  Boodles is the only appropriate gin for martinis, and martinis should never be made with vodka.  And they should never have anything in them but a lemon peel.  Or maybe an olive.  I don't care whether they're stirred or shaken.

2.  Centenario Tequila.

3.  Germain Robin Old Havana Brandy


I guess that's my list.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #44 on: May 05, 2006, 04:11:08 pm »
I'm not really a martini expert, but I thought your take on shaken v. stirred was interesting. Most martini buffs I have heard from are very insistent that shaking ruins a martini.
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #45 on: May 05, 2006, 04:12:33 pm »
Quote:

I'm not really a martini expert, but I thought your take on shaken v. stirred was interesting. Most martini buffs I have heard from are very insistent that shaking ruins a martini.




I don't know about that, but the shakers themselves are very cool.  And after you've had two martinis, who cares?
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #46 on: May 05, 2006, 04:12:40 pm »
ah, the very predictable discussion of martinis between Biz and Neil. the sight of kindred spirits discussing important issues is heartwarming.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #47 on: May 05, 2006, 04:15:49 pm »
Quote:

ah, the very predictable discussion of martinis between Biz and Neil. the sight of kindred spirits discussing important issues is heartwarming.




Pretty good.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #48 on: May 05, 2006, 04:18:41 pm »
Are you feeling left out Jim?

I saw Matt Belisle's cousin play the other day out at St. Andrews Episcopal. Little kid (just a freshmen) but a pretty good ballplayer. Maybe with a little Raup coaching he could make it to the show too.
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

Spider Pellini

  • Clark
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #49 on: May 05, 2006, 04:32:18 pm »
Quote:

ah, the very predictable discussion of martinis between Biz and Neil. the sight of kindred spirits discussing important issues is heartwarming.




Whatever happened to pounding the old Budweiser?

Was a day when if you was going to drink Gin it meant a slug straight out of the bottle.  Shaken?  Stirred? I'm guessing little finger position is real important to them yahoos too.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #50 on: May 05, 2006, 04:43:12 pm »
Quote:

Early Times is not choice, but it is drinkable (Mixes pretty well with rootbeer of all things, but I wouldn't choose it straight up or even with water really).

I haven't had a julep I liked, but I haven't had that many.






bizdiz, you are an idiot.  i'm sorry that this thread got away from that topic.

JackAstro

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3824
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #51 on: May 05, 2006, 04:50:40 pm »
The time seemed right for a hijacking. I can see from the meandering into plastic-bottle, improvisational whiskey mixers and martinis that I was wrong. You can have the thread back now, I'll try again at a later date.
"We live in a society of laws. Why do you think I took you to all those Police Academy movies? For fun? Well, I didn't hear anybody laughing, did you?"
Say hi on the Twitter

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #52 on: May 05, 2006, 04:52:29 pm »
Quote:

but how about top five hard liquors?



Not necessarily in this order (and not necessarily in separate glasses):
Grey Goose Vodka
Crown Royal
Patron Tequila
Gordon's Gin
Cacha?a (dunno a brand name)
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #53 on: May 05, 2006, 04:54:51 pm »
Quote:

The time seemed right for a hijacking. I can see from the meandering into plastic-bottle, improvisational whiskey mixers and martinis that I was wrong. You can have the thread back now, I'll try again at a later date.




Just remember, you can't stop a hijack in process, and you can't control it, either.

On the other hand, they do from time to time fall flat on their face.  I know.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #54 on: May 05, 2006, 04:55:10 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

I'm not really a martini expert, but I thought your take on shaken v. stirred was interesting. Most martini buffs I have heard from are very insistent that shaking ruins a martini.




I don't know about that, but the shakers themselves are very cool.  And after you've had two martinis, who cares?




The martini rule:

One is not enough
Two is too many
Three is not enough

FTR, I like my martini (a gibson) shaken, not stirred.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

JackAstro

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3824
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #55 on: May 05, 2006, 04:59:05 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

The time seemed right for a hijacking. I can see from the meandering into plastic-bottle, improvisational whiskey mixers and martinis that I was wrong. You can have the thread back now, I'll try again at a later date.




Just remember, you can't stop a hijack in process, and you can't control it, either.

On the other hand, they do from time to time fall flat on their face.  I know.





That is so true, as evidenced by last week's 24. Perhaps I should have screamed my list in the Jack Bauer Voice. That seems to get results.
"We live in a society of laws. Why do you think I took you to all those Police Academy movies? For fun? Well, I didn't hear anybody laughing, did you?"
Say hi on the Twitter

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #56 on: May 05, 2006, 05:02:23 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

The time seemed right for a hijacking. I can see from the meandering into plastic-bottle, improvisational whiskey mixers and martinis that I was wrong. You can have the thread back now, I'll try again at a later date.




Just remember, you can't stop a hijack in process, and you can't control it, either.

On the other hand, they do from time to time fall flat on their face.  I know.




That is so true, as evidenced by last week's 24. Perhaps I should have screamed my list in the Jack Bauer Voice. That seems to get results.




by the way jackastro, regarding that simpsons quote in your signature, i've heard plenty of people laughing during police academy movies.  is it part 3 where mahoney hires a prostitute who ends up giving a bj to an unknowing lassard under the podium during an important speech?  i don't know what's funnier than that.

JackAstro

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3824
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #57 on: May 05, 2006, 05:07:13 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

The time seemed right for a hijacking. I can see from the meandering into plastic-bottle, improvisational whiskey mixers and martinis that I was wrong. You can have the thread back now, I'll try again at a later date.




Just remember, you can't stop a hijack in process, and you can't control it, either.

On the other hand, they do from time to time fall flat on their face.  I know.




That is so true, as evidenced by last week's 24. Perhaps I should have screamed my list in the Jack Bauer Voice. That seems to get results.




by the way jackastro, regarding that simpsons quote in your signature, i've heard plenty of people laughing during police academy movies.  is it part 3 where mahoney hires a prostitute who ends up giving a bj to an unknowing lassard under the podium during an important speech?  i don't know what's funnier than that.




I've secretly laughed at all of the movies, but only for the funny sounds. I'm simple like that. Your argument is with Homer, not with me.
"We live in a society of laws. Why do you think I took you to all those Police Academy movies? For fun? Well, I didn't hear anybody laughing, did you?"
Say hi on the Twitter

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #58 on: May 05, 2006, 06:06:48 pm »
Quote:

martinis should never be made with vodka




A vodka martini is like a chicken fajita. It doesn't really exist, but has been pounded into everyone's lexicon. (There you go Noe, hard liquor + tex-mex)

My question is why, when you change the most tangential aspect of a martini (the olive for an onion), the name changes, but when you switch the martini's foundation (gin for vodka) the name remains.

My take on the shaking v stirring debate: shaking waters down the drink ruining its taste. Also, it should be stirred in a glass pitcher, as the metal in the shakers also alters the tast. I have no idea if the metal thing is true, but that's what my dad taught me and it's fun to snobbishly repeat it.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

No? in Austin

  • Guest
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #59 on: May 05, 2006, 07:47:02 pm »
Top Five Mexican Food (every man style):

5.  Caldo De Res  - done correctly, this soup is a necessity for a sleepy time afternoon meal.  Remember, what we in the US call lunch is actually called dinner in Mexico.  You eat around 1:00 or so and the meal can last quite a while.  There is no such thing as lunch in Mexico, just breakfast, dinner and then a late night supper (usually a light meal).  Caldo De Res is the essence of what dinner should be in Mexico.  A huge bowl, lots of veggies, a shank bone with lots-o-meat, rice (dump it into the soup, trust me, this works!), lemons (to squeeze into the soup) and a ton of corn tortillas.  Use a little bit of salt on the tortillas as your roll them into a flute-like shape.  Have a nice tall glass of Coca-Cola with the meal.  Pure heaven.  And be prepared to take a good long siesta right after the last spoonful of soup is consumed.

4.  Milanesa - A breaded thin steak usually served with steak fries and guacamole.  Milanesa is different than a chicken fried steak (for example), in that it is very thin, lightly breaded instead of dipped in batter.  I love the way my Mom cooks milanesa, not too heavy on the oil frying (yeah, it has to be fried in a pan), she uses a combo of saltine crackers and bread crumbs.  Yummy.  Eat Milanesa with freah four tortillas or bolillos.  Boliollos are similar to french bread, but are intentionally smaller.  About hand size.  If you want, you could make a good milanesa torta, to which you would have to layer some refried beans on the bread, then some lettuce and tomato, then the milanesa, then some guacamole and top it of with some light mayo and some chile powder.  I've tried to get milanesa at Tex-Mex places, including tortas, and generally get very dissapointed with the results.  Like I said, I'm biased by my mom's really good frying technique to come out with an excellent end product.

3.   Entomatadas - this is literally tomato dipped enchilladas that are not deep fried, but slightly fried and baked.  The key is to really season the tomato paste dip with good spices that ooze right into the corn tortilla.  Don't use cheese covering over the chicken tortilla entomatada nor sauce of any sort.  Allow the tomato paste to be the only thing that creates the taste.  Warning, the tomato paste can cause a little bit of heartburn due to over use of spices.  But the first taste of the entomatada hitting the taste buds is heaven! I would recommend only rice with this meal, no beans nor guacamole needed.  You'll probably ask for about five or six entomatadas when all is said and done.

2.  Tamales - I am very partial to my mother-in-laws tamales de res.  She has tried for years to get her girls (my sister-in-law and wife) to learn how to make tamales like her.  My brother-in-law and I always get together and pray in the back room while the lessons are given every christmas, and as of yet, they remain unanswered.  Sadly, my sister-in-law has gotten closer to mastering the technique of La Tamalera.  My wife is a Tamalera drop-out and it is slightly depressing in a way.  I've offered to sit in for her, but tradition requires women only with bandanas on thier heads and tons of gossip in their lips.  It is the gossip that is the reason men are not allowed in the sacred ritual.  Must make the tamales taste as good as they do, women at ease and with total enjoyment make for good food.  Sorta like the movie "Like Water for Chocolate", except for the nekidity.

1.  Chile Relleno - there is no better mexican food for the every day man than Chile Relleno.  I have yet to find a good restraurant that serves Chile Relleno that is to die for.  Not a one.  Some come close, but oft times, there is perhaps one missing ingredient or they pretend to cook it right, but it's nothign more than a microwave poser of a relleno they bring out to you.  I can understand why it is hard to find good resturant cooked rellenos.  The poblamo pepper is the key and apprently it is hard to keep fresh.  So all these places will place their peppers in a freezer or cold storage area and let it get a bit rubbery.  So if ever you're invited to a friend house and they say they're going to serve fresh chile relleno for dinner (or supper), bring them a nice present as a thank you.  Six pack of Negro Modelo might be the right ticket.  My mom would shop for fresh poblano peppers at certain times, so when I knew she was at the market doing that, I knew not to miss dinner/supper that night.  As good as my mom's chile rellenos were, my aunt would make a killer relleno because she added little extras like raisins to the stuffing (usually, you stuff the pepper with a picadillo, which is a spicy ground beef mix).

Honorable mention: Cabrito (baby goat) and Barbacoa (served right out of the pit)

Andyzipp

  • Guest
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #60 on: May 05, 2006, 08:24:31 pm »
Quote:


4.  Milanesa - A breaded thin steak usually served with steak fries and guacamole.  Milanesa is different than a chicken fried steak (for example), in that it is very thin, lightly breaded instead of dipped in batter.  





Chicken Fried steak is not dipped in batter.  Rather it should be dredged thrice. Once in seasoned fLour, one in beaten eggs and once more in seasoned flour.  This is after it has had the crap kicked out of it by a hammer for a substantial period of time.

And I would add Carne Guisada to your list, amigo.

strobum

  • Roster Filler
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #61 on: May 05, 2006, 10:51:04 pm »
I am a taqueria junkie. My holy trinity

Carnitas
Pollo con Mole
Carne Guisada

Honorable mention; Gorditos al pastor.

If you live in Houston and like Mex-Mex there are two places  you must try. Picos and Taqueria Mexico. Both of them are on Bellaire Blvd. Picos (near Renwick) is a tad pricey, while Taqueria Mexico (near Hillcroft) is more in line with your standard taqueria.

Andyzipp

  • Guest
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #62 on: May 06, 2006, 12:18:54 pm »
I'm growing more and more fond of 100% Taquito on 59 at Buffalo Speedway.

No? in Austin

  • Guest
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #63 on: May 06, 2006, 12:50:46 pm »
Quote:

Chicken Fried steak is not dipped in batter.  Rather it should be dredged thrice. Once in seasoned fLour, one in beaten eggs and once more in seasoned flour.  This is after it has had the crap kicked out of it by a hammer for a substantial period of time.




Cool.  Didn't know that (not entirely a chicken fried steak fan, but every once and awhile...).  Milanesa steaks are also pounded flat with a mallet.  It makes for frying the steak with all that bread crumb/saltine cracker covering easier.

Quote:

And I would add Carne Guisada to your list, amigo.




It was considered for the honorable mention list.  I've lost respect for the carne guisada plate, once the staple of all Tex-Mex restaurants in town because it just doesn't seem to be made the same any more.  It tends to be on the greasy side now instead of the saucy side it once was.  My dad used to go down to the Green Leaf restaurant (when my mom would get the day off on a weekend from cooking) in second ward when I was growning up.  It was carne guisada blue plate specials all around when he would take my brother and I along with him.  It is what rice and beans is made for, moreso than enchilladas.  Also how flour tortillas made their mark.  Up until then, rarely did you stray from the corn tortillas for dinner (lunchtime meals).  Flour tortillas were rare back in the day, but when you had carne guisada, it was a must.  The Green Leaf is gone now, been gone for many a year.  It was a victim of having a taco place sprout up one block from it's location.  That taco place was actually in a bakery run by the Lorenzo family.  The taco place became a restaraunt name Ninfa's when Mr. Lorenzo died and Mrs. Lorenzo had to do something to keep the family together.  Props to her for being at the right place, at the right time when both the flour tortilla and the new grill sensation called the "fajita" came together.  It made her rich when everyone just had to taste this new Mexican food sensation.

Funny how it made the second ward regulars of the Green Leaf scratch their heads at the ruckus.  Fajita was a derivite of the word "Faja" which literally means "belt", as in the belt you wear to hold you pants up.  Fajita meat was actually throw away meat from the butchers because it was very tough meat to cook, especially in a "guisado".  Then one day in "El Norte" (northern part of Mexico), some of the poor folk would tell the butchers to allow them to buy the faja meat.  Butchers started to oblige, selling it very cheap.  Folks started to cut the meat sideways, the idea being to make it a very thin slice of meat.   Then they would throw it on a grill.  That is how the carne asada was born.  It was still considered a poor man's meal until butchers and patrons alike started to experiment with ways to grill and season the meat.  Carne Asada became a rage and the fajita (a strip of the faja thinned out meat cut) was born soon afterwards.  Originally, eating carne asada or the fajita meat required having corn tortilla at the ready along with lots of lemons or lime along to add flavor to the meat once cooked down to a medium well down state.  Also required the combination of onions, tomatoes and chiles that the common folks would dice up and throw together into a small mollete.  It was called "pico de gallo" because it had the sting about it, similar to a peck from a rooster.  It probably got it's name from cock fights that would come along with traveling carnivals common to the Norte of Mexico (I'm guessing).  Traveling carnivals were the best way for foods like the carne asada and fajita to make the rounds from town to town, probably similar to food like "Gorditas" and "Taquitos".  Little old ladies cooking Gorditas or taquitos over a comal at a carnival were commonplace, so it stands to reason that the fajita/pico de gallo combo probably had a similar experience making the rounds.

When the flour tortilla was combined with the fajita and carne asada, it opened up a whole new world of taste and that is how places like Ninfa's made it's mark in the Tex-Mex world.  Funny how I remember the Green Leaf more than I do Ninfa's (many a cousin worked as busboys for Ninfa's, so I could eat there often for free).  I actually miss the carne guisada more than the carne asada, and of course the flour tortilla that went with the carne guisada as well.  Almost every time I will choose corn tortillas over the flour, even with breakfast tacos.  But with carne guisada, there is no better choice than the flour tortilla.

strobum

  • Roster Filler
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #64 on: May 06, 2006, 01:05:36 pm »
I work in Greenway so I go to 100% for lunch on a fairly regular basis.

However, there are dozens of Taquerias on Bellare Blvd. that are both better and cheaper.

On a semi-related sidenote, if Tex-mex is your forte, Lopez Mexican restaurant on Wilcrest is on par with Pappasitos, El Tiempo, Molina's.s etc. at about half the price. Their top shelf margaritas (Herradura, Patron, etc.) are spectacular and relatively cheap - and the food and service are unbelievable.

However, this place is a favorite of just about everyone who lives in Stafford, Missouri City and Sugarland, so the crowds  can be a bit overwhelming. If you're planning on going there for dinner on a Friday or Saturday night, you'd be well advised to arrive no later than six p.m.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #65 on: May 06, 2006, 01:09:35 pm »
Quote:

My take on the shaking v stirring debate: shaking waters down the drink ruining its taste. Also, it should be stirred in a glass pitcher, as the metal in the shakers also alters the tast. I have no idea if the metal thing is true, but that's what my dad taught me and it's fun to snobbishly repeat it.



Winston Churchill liked just a show of vermouth in his martinis.  And by "show", I mean literally.  He would waive the bottle over the gin.  He would also drink champagne with breakfast every day.

Winnie is my all-time hero.  He was a brilliant intellect and he kicked butt all whilst drunk as a Lord.  And he was a Lord.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

UpTooLate

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1089
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #66 on: May 06, 2006, 01:23:15 pm »
Martinis are disgusting.  Time to rehijack.

Lopez on Wilcrest is  alright. For mega kick ass cheap Tex-Mex, the best I'm aware of is Tia Maria's at Mangum and Dacoma (one block west of 290).

I am in total agreement with Noe that a good chile relleno is the top of the list.  But they are difficult to locate.  In fact I've never had a good one in Houston.  For good chile rellenos, El Paso is one place they can be found.  If ever in El Paso, go to Delicious Mexican Food on Fort Blvd.  It is pretty much a small lunch counter where most people pick up their order to go, but the chile relleno burrito is the freaking bomb.  Honorable mention would go to Kiki's restaurant/bar on Piedras St.
"Go with Christ" - Eric "The Dawg" Cartman

strobum

  • Roster Filler
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #67 on: May 06, 2006, 01:36:04 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

My take on the shaking v stirring debate: shaking waters down the drink ruining its taste. Also, it should be stirred in a glass pitcher, as the metal in the shakers also alters the tast. I have no idea if the metal thing is true, but that's what my dad taught me and it's fun to snobbishly repeat it.



Winston Churchill liked just a show of vermouth in his martinis.  And by "show", I mean literally.  He would waive the bottle over the gin.  He would also drink champagne with breakfast every day.

Winnie is my all-time hero.  He was a brilliant intellect and he kicked butt all whilst drunk as a Lord.  And he was a Lord.





Have you ever read his four-volume "A History of English-Speaking people"? I know what you're thinking, "Winston Churchill wrote a 2,500 page hisory of England?!?!" Well, yes, he did, and it's quite good. He does tend to cannonize some of the folks on his family tree (especially John Churchill). But you can hardly blame him - John Churchill was a bad-ass.

strobum

  • Roster Filler
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #68 on: May 06, 2006, 01:41:00 pm »
Quote:

Martinis are disgusting.  Time to rehijack.

Lopez on Wilcrest is  alright. For mega kick ass cheap Tex-Mex, the best I'm aware of is Tia Maria's at Mangum and Tacoma (one block west of 290).





Never been to Tia Maria's, I'll have to check it out the next time I'm on that side of town. Do you have any favorite Taquerias in Houston?

UpTooLate

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1089
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #69 on: May 06, 2006, 02:16:00 pm »
IMHO Taqueria Tapatilla located on Richmond (between Shepherd and Montrose) is the gold standard for taquerias.  There is also an excellent taqueria at the corner of Broadway/I-45 near Hobby airport (cant remember the name of the place).  Taqueria Arandas is also very reliable and has many locations around town.  The Arandas location on hwy 59 north has a full size bakery next to the restaurant with excellent offerings (the fresh baked rolls kick ass).

My vote for the best taqueria food choice:  Beef fajita Torta with plenty of avacado, spicy red sauce, and a dash of salt.  Wash it down with an ice cold Tecate(or three).
"Go with Christ" - Eric "The Dawg" Cartman

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #70 on: May 06, 2006, 02:35:57 pm »
Quote:


Winston Churchill liked just a show of vermouth in his martinis.  And by "show", I mean literally.  He would waive the bottle over the gin.  






A true martini is all vermouth with a half a thimble of gin.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

No? in Austin

  • Guest
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #71 on: May 06, 2006, 02:47:58 pm »
Quote:

My vote for the best taqueria food choice:  Beef fajita Torta with plenty of avacado, spicy red sauce, and a dash of salt.  Wash it down with an ice cold Tecate(or three).




Eggs-cellent choice.  I'm of course a fan of the milanesa torta with the thin spead of refried beans.  I made a mistake when I mentioned guacamole, I should've said avacado slices instead.  Thanks for reminding me.  Also, I totally concur that the chile relleno choices at restaraunts in and around Houston basically suck.  You have to find a place like in El Paso where the pablanos can be picked up at the local market that day and prepared that same day for the patrons.  If you find a place like that in Houston, you've just found a piece of heaven.

As far as taquerias, the Arandas chain is very good.  A-typical of the Norteno Mexico style of grill meat/tacos.  Nortenos love to grill and eat right on the spot, so a good standard for a taqueria is to have one come close to the *grill and eat* standard.  I've seen some with the fajita's pre-grilled and stored in a fridge, only to be re-heated on a flat pancake grill stovetop.  Not entirely bad, but if you find one that grills it's own prepared marinated meat (usually letting a marinated steak sit overnight in the fridge is awesome tender meat for grilling the next day)... WOW!  Taquerias always come close to the Norteno grill-fest, but if you ever have the pleasure of being at true Norteno grill, you would notice the standard to which a Taqueria aspires.  That is why I really loved the original Taco Cabana in San Antonio (on San Pedro street).  They were into grill and eat, so the asada (steak only at the time, they added chicken later when folks started to ask for it) was perfect.  If you go into a Taco Cabana nowadays, you can see them grilling the meat early in the morning, however this is so they can store it and re-heat it later when they're ready to cook an order.  In the original Taco Cabana, it was truly "grill and eat" standard and it was fantastic.

When I was in college, I spent one entire summer in Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon.  My sister lived there with her husband, who was working for a perto-chem company as a chemical engineer.  While there in Garza Garcia (a few miles west of Monterrey, going towards Saltillo), it was not uncommon to be invited to a Norteno grill.  The local butcher was about 28 years of age.  He inherited the business when his dad died of a unfortunate heart attack.  About once or twice a month, Mario would make sure we all knew he intended to have a Norteno grill (they called it an "Asada").  The word would spread through the community, and somehow we all knew what to bring as our contributions.  Whether it be the limones, avacados, onions, the tomatoes, fresh corn tortillas from the "tortillera" or even the beer... we always had plenty for about 15 of us or so.  Mario would bring the meat, tenderized and marinated overnight.  We'd gather in his "tereno" (plot of land) right near the foothills (La Oxateca was a valley nearby where he had his cattle graze).  A campfire would be built and four stone pillars would be erected once the fire was good and strong. Mario would bring a grill mesh and place it over the stone pillars.  The tortillas were already fresh and hot.  Someone would take the vegies and quickly make the pick de gallo.  Others would take foil and wrap onions with it and then toss them into the fire itself.  Once the foil showed signs of charring, they'd take it out.  The onion would be nice and tender and oh so sweet.  It's called "cebolla asada".  We'd douse the cebolla asada with limon (lemon or lime) juice.  Man, fresh, hot and right off the grill.  Then we'd cook the meat.  Whilest waiting for the tender, juicy meat to cook (la asada), we'd drink a brew or two.  I hate to mention that the beer of choice was Tecate, but it was.  Mainly because it was cheap, cheap, cheap beer that college age kids could afford.

Once the first few carne asadas were ready, you'd pick it off the grill with your hand and place it right into the tortilla (the fresh stack would be off to the side).  A sprinkle of pico de gallo, a sprist of limon, a slice of avacado and maybe some cilantro and you're ready to eat.  And eat, and eat, and eat.

That was the Norteno grills I remember oh so well.  Being out under the cover of the milky way covered night sky near the start of the Sierra Madre foothills (which of course start there and end up somewhere in the northwest US), just added to the experience.  Women, music, career aperations and sports (futbol) were the topic of night as well.

Good times.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #72 on: May 06, 2006, 03:47:32 pm »
Quote:


As far as taquerias, the Arandas chain is very good.  A-typical of the Norteno Mexico style of grill meat/tacos.  Nortenos love to grill and eat right on the spot, so a good standard for a taqueria is to have one come close to the *grill and eat* standard.





this is something i've wondered about for a while.  there's the enormous chain of Taqueria Arandas in Houston and Waco too (with the goat insignia) that are okay but nothing special.  but there's a smaller chain of Taqueria Arandas (maybe 5 or 6 restaurants) in Austin that have different design and far superior food (and top notch salsa).  are these related in any way?

Quote:


When I was in college, I spent one entire summer in Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon.  My sister lived there with her husband, who was working for a perto-chem company as a chemical engineer.  While there in Garza Garcia (a few miles west of Monterrey, going towards Saltillo), it was not uncommon to be invited to a Norteno grill.  The local btcher was about 28 years of age...
That was the Norteno grills I remember oh so well.  Being out under the cover of the milky way covered night sky near the start of the Sierra Madre foothills (which of course start there and end up somewhere in the northwest US), just added to the experience.  Women, music, career aperations and sports (futbol) were the topic of night as well.

Good times.





This is right near the "Grutas Garcias," right?  A couple of years ago my wife and I went to a random restaurant in Garza Garcia that was possibly the best Mexican food I've ever had.  The place was basically just this mid-sized enclosed patio area with a bunch of picnic tables (we were the only ones there) and an adjacent kitchen.  We got an Al Pastor/Cabrito plate and a Chicken Plate, and it was so tasty it made me cry.  The chicken had that weird reddish grill color you see occassionally, with tons of different kinds of onions and peppers.  The pastor/cabrito mix was tender and buttery, served with these shredded corn tortillas wedges.  Just an amazing meal.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #73 on: May 06, 2006, 04:41:36 pm »
I have found that individual branches of the various Houston-area taqueria chains vary almost wildly in terms of quality. I agree that Tapatia on Richmond is surprisingly solid. My choice for desayuno is without a doubt Laredo on Washington Avenue. They are almost invariably grilling meat in the morning (visible from the parking lot via a large window), and I now know to disapprove of this and with good reason. But for breakfast this is the place, hands-down.

I guess at the end of the day I'm partial to the El Alte?o chains, particularly the one on Harrisburg.

I'm not wild about Taqeria Mexico on Bellaire, I do not like Pico's (what the hell is the big deal about that place?) and fervently decry the idea never mind the practice of eating dinner at 6 pm.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregĂșntale a Pedro Navaja

Lefty

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3539
    • View Profile
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #74 on: May 06, 2006, 05:45:29 pm »
Quote:

I have found that individual branches of the various Houston-area taqueria chains vary almost wildly in terms of quality. I agree that Tapatia on Richmond is surprisingly solid. My choice for desayuno is without a doubt Laredo on Washington Avenue. They are almost invariably grilling meat in the morning (visible from the parking lot via a large window), and I now know to disapprove of this and with good reason. But for breakfast this is the place, hands-down.



Agreed, Laredo's breakfast is awesome.

Best cheap TexMex eats I've found in Houston is Teotehuacan.    Honestly haven't had anything bad there.  Great seafood.  I prefer the original on Cavalcade/Irvington, but there's a newer nicer one in the Studemont/Main area.
You may ask yourself, "How do I work this?"

No? in Austin

  • Guest
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #75 on: May 06, 2006, 08:47:31 pm »
Quote:

This is right near the "Grutas Garcias," right?




Yup.  I was totally disappointed by "Las Grutas", too commercial and too contrived.  But...

Quote:

A couple of years ago my wife and I went to a random restaurant in Garza Garcia that was possibly the best Mexican food I've ever had.  The place was basically just this mid-sized enclosed patio area with a bunch of picnic tables (we were the only ones there) and an adjacent kitchen.  We got an Al Pastor/Cabrito plate and a Chicken Plate, and it was so tasty it made me cry.  The chicken had that weird reddish grill color you see occassionally, with tons of different kinds of onions and peppers.  The pastor/cabrito mix was tender and buttery, served with these shredded corn tortillas wedges.  Just an amazing meal.




I think I've been to the same place.  It is near Las Grutas, but unfortunately I did not have the Cabrito.  Everyone I was with insisted I have it, but I went with a smaller meal, a chicken plate.  It was outstanding.  I never tasted the cabrito from the other plates though.  Looks like a missed I good chance at a wonderful meal!

No? in Austin

  • Guest
Re: Ausmus has a bad case of the "We's"
« Reply #76 on: May 06, 2006, 08:57:19 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

I have found that individual branches of the various Houston-area taqueria chains vary almost wildly in terms of quality. I agree that Tapatia on Richmond is surprisingly solid. My choice for desayuno is without a doubt Laredo on Washington Avenue. They are almost invariably grilling meat in the morning (visible from the parking lot via a large window), and I now know to disapprove of this and with good reason. But for breakfast this is the place, hands-down.



Agreed, Laredo's breakfast is awesome.

Best cheap TexMex eats I've found in Houston is Teotehuacan.    Honestly haven't had anything bad there.  Great seafood.  I prefer the original on Cavalcade/Irvington, but there's a newer nicer one in the Studemont/Main area.





I've had folks tell me great things about breakfast at Laredos on Washington.  Sadly, never been there.  By far, the best Tex-Mex breakfast I've had is Mi Tierra in San Antonio, near the farmers market.  As far as Teotechaucan on Calvacade, my family in Houston loves the place.  I ate there one time with them as a celebration of a graduation of one of nephews.  It was outstanding!

A place a friend of mine loved when I would visit him in Houston was Don Pablos on 75th and Harrisburg.  It used to be part of the Donneraki restraurants, but they sold it to one of the orginal owners of Donneraki who wanted to serve Norteno grill his own way.  The fajita taco plate (with corn tortillas, not flour) are primo!  I have not visited my friend in a long time though, he was in the midst of a divorce at the time and  I think he has since moved back to Laredo, Texas where he was from.  I have no idea if Don Pablos is even around any more.

Oh, and at one time, the Donneraki on Irvington/Calvacade was very good, borderline great Norteno grill.  This was a place that followed that tradition of "grill and eat" for a very long time.  I think the last time I went to the place though, it was different.  Very different and it was sad.