This is bs. He is a decent OFer, as we had seen in Houston, and as I saw in RR. He can and will play 1B. He played 1B in RR and did fine.Where the hell do you get these ideas? Are you new to baseball? One dimensional? He’ll, no.
Álvarez was 16 or 17, 180 pounds, and had not yet played played a game for the Dodgers. They needed Fields, who was a MLB reliever who throws hard. This was a no-brained for LA because they did not have an inkling of who he would become.
The answer to your question is no. Hell no.
Great to hear eye witness testimony regarding his current & potential OF and 1B proficiency! That is good news. My question was based on a limited sample, having seen him handle a few innings in one game, as well as how he has been under utilized (so far) in an NL home game - the St. Louis series.
Thanks also for your take of LA's reason to want a present value of Field's FB to any future value of their fresh and certainly unknown/unproven signee. That makes sense to me.
Heck, tho they had been w/ the organization for some time, the Astros gave away JD Martinez and Laureano b/f their potential was fully realized and, until they showed more, they could not break in to 25-man roster, much less the lineup. The Dodgers trade was based on scant information about Alvarez, obviously less than the Astros scouts had seen.
His ONLY AB last night reminded me why I hated the DH. It's hard not to enjoy Alvarez as a DH. (Tho I still get the haunting feeling from my younger self, that I am losing my baseball "virginity"}
I wonder if another former NL Astros fans also feel some minimal discomfort mixed with their joy of having Alvarez as an Astro DH.
Tks, JimR