Author Topic: Lunacy in Politics  (Read 6522 times)

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Lunacy in Politics
« on: December 28, 2010, 09:42:24 am »
Online petition plan for Parliament to go ahead

Quote
A plan to allow popular online petitions to be debated in Parliament within a year has been given the go-ahead by the government.

...

Labour MP Paul Flynn, a member of the Commons public administration committee, criticised the government's proposal, telling BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "This seems to be an attractive idea to those who haven't seen how useless this has been in other parts of the world when it's tried.

"If you ask people the question 'do you want to pay less tax?', they vote yes. If we get the e-petitions in there will be some asking for Jeremy Clarkson to be prime minister, for Jedi and Darth Vader to be the religions of the country.

"The blogosphere is not an area that is open to sensible debate; it is dominated by the obsessed and the fanatical and we will get crazy ideas coming forward."


"I would like to refer my honourable colleague to the comments made by Jay in Houston in which he pointed out that, and I quote: 'Necktown ladies sing this song!  Do-dah!  Do-dah!' "
« Last Edit: December 28, 2010, 09:43:58 am by Limey »
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2010, 10:05:59 am »
Fanatical and crazy...on the internet...the hell you say.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

geezerdonk

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3342
  • a long tradition of existence
    • View Profile
Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2010, 01:31:16 pm »
The concept (much less the implementation) of popular goverance is dangerous and subversive. It is rightly ridiculed and should be suppressed, violently if necessary. Otherwise we would find laws and policies proposed and enacted by frauds and fools motivated by greed and all manner of corruption; in contrast to current government operation.
E come vivo? Vivo.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2010, 01:46:30 pm »
The concept (much less the implementation) of popular goverance is dangerous and subversive. It is rightly ridiculed and should be suppressed, violently if necessary. Otherwise we would find laws and policies proposed and enacted by frauds and fools motivated by greed and all manner of corruption; in contrast to current government operation.

Right.  Allowing every half-baked dimwit with an internet connection equal time is clearly the best use of our collective governance resources.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #4 on: December 28, 2010, 01:59:51 pm »
i have often thought about running for office
not sure other than the zone who would be my base
forever is composed entirely of nows

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2010, 02:05:51 pm »
i have often thought about running for office
not sure other than the zone who would be my base

Well, you're already a graduate of the Sarah Palin Made Up Words School of Public Speaking.  There's a precedent.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Ebby Calvin

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3595
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #6 on: December 28, 2010, 02:18:20 pm »
Well, you're already a graduate of the Sarah Palin Made Up Words School of Public Speaking.  There's a precedent.

Fredia, WTF?!?
Don't think twice, it's alright.

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #7 on: December 28, 2010, 06:25:02 pm »
i have often thought about running for office
not sure other than the zone who would be my base

I will gladly run your campaign gratis.   This will kick ass.

SaltyParker

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1455
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #8 on: December 28, 2010, 07:51:02 pm »
shades of Alvin Greene,

BatGirl

  • Contributor
  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1219
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #9 on: December 28, 2010, 09:01:37 pm »
..because chickens are decent people.

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #10 on: December 28, 2010, 09:37:21 pm »
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #11 on: December 28, 2010, 09:38:10 pm »

GreatBagwellsBeard

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2990
  • The damn paterfamilias
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #12 on: December 29, 2010, 08:09:24 am »
Drinking for two.

“I want to paint a mural of Houston for the kids, but I’m terrible at drawing swamp humidity"

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #13 on: December 29, 2010, 10:11:12 am »
keep fredia weird


my stand
forever is composed entirely of nows

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #14 on: December 29, 2010, 10:16:12 am »
Well, you're already a graduate of the Sarah Palin Made Up Words School of Public Speaking.  There's a precedent.

In other news, Palin is trying to deflect the attention given to her creation of the word "refudiate" by saying it was a typo on her Blackberry.  Clearly forgetting that (a) things like the internet exist; and (b) that she said it live on TV four days before her infamous tweet.  That woman couldn't keep a story straight if her life depended on it.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #15 on: December 29, 2010, 11:04:15 am »
In other news, Palin is trying to deflect the attention given to her creation of the word "refudiate" by saying it was a typo on her Blackberry.  Clearly forgetting that (a) things like the internet exist; and (b) that she said it live on TV four days before her infamous tweet.  That woman couldn't keep a story straight if her life depended on it.

I thought she compared herself to Shakespeare and mentioned how she's "progressing" the English language. And Bush's made up words were much funnier.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #16 on: December 29, 2010, 11:12:08 am »
I thought she compared herself to Shakespeare and mentioned how she's "progressing" the English language. And Bush's made up words were much funnier.

Nucular?
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #17 on: December 29, 2010, 11:22:44 am »
Nucular?

Dipshit Jimmy Carter couldn't say that word either.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #18 on: December 29, 2010, 11:25:57 am »
Dipshit Nobel Peace Prize Winner Jimmy Carter couldn't say that word either.

Your point being?
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #19 on: December 29, 2010, 11:29:18 am »
this is exhibit A why i hate politics threads.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #20 on: December 29, 2010, 11:35:00 am »
this is exhibit A why i hate politics threads.

A? I'd figure we're at least up to X or Y by now.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #21 on: December 29, 2010, 11:38:11 am »
this is exhibit A why i hate politics threads.

As it turns out, politics isn't a choice.  It's genetics.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #22 on: December 29, 2010, 11:40:31 am »
Dipshit Jimmy Carter couldn't say that word either.

Well, Carter *was* a nucular engineer....

People who simply pronounce it "nucular" don't bother me as much as people who actually think that's the correct word.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #23 on: December 29, 2010, 11:56:39 am »
Well, Carter *was* a nucular engineer....

People who simply pronounce it "nucular" don't bother me as much as people who actually think that's the correct word.

And here I thought he was a peanut farmer.

GreatBagwellsBeard

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2990
  • The damn paterfamilias
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #24 on: December 29, 2010, 11:57:37 am »
And here I thought he was a peanut farmer.

And I thought Diet Dr Pepper tasted more like Dr Pepper.   
Drinking for two.

“I want to paint a mural of Houston for the kids, but I’m terrible at drawing swamp humidity"

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #25 on: December 29, 2010, 12:06:18 pm »
And here I thought he was a peanut farmer.

He was that too. I don't know if they were nucular peanuts though.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #26 on: December 29, 2010, 12:17:49 pm »
He was that too. I don't know if they were nucular peanuts though.

That would explain the color of those peanut patties.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

subnuclear

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6116
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #27 on: December 29, 2010, 12:25:43 pm »
For what its worth, its pretty lenient to call him a nuclear engineer.  He was a naval officer who got involved with nuclear submarine development at the very tail end of his career.  He really didn't have the background to do the things nuclear engineers typically do and he left before the first nuke sub went into service. 

Ty in Tampa

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 9111
  • You just gotta keep livin' man, L-I-V-I-N
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #28 on: December 29, 2010, 02:14:42 pm »
For what its worth, its pretty lenient to call him a nuclear engineer.  He was a naval officer who got involved with nuclear submarine development at the very tail end of his career.  He really didn't have the background to do the things nuclear engineers typically do and he left before the first nuke sub went into service. 


Somehow I trust you on this.
"You want me broken. You want me dead.
I'm living rent-free in the back of your head."

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #29 on: December 29, 2010, 04:02:26 pm »
Somehow I trust you on this.

He's in pre-Med.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #30 on: December 29, 2010, 04:15:42 pm »
For what its worth, its pretty lenient to call him a nuclear engineer.  He was a naval officer who got involved with nuclear submarine development at the very tail end of his career.  He really didn't have the background to do the things nuclear engineers typically do and he left before the first nuke sub went into service. 


Which is probably why he was only a "nucular" engineer.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #31 on: December 29, 2010, 05:17:22 pm »
talking about politics did you know the bikers (non motor) want to include a bike/pesditirian lane when they redo mopaq. claims of up to 10000 people livine and working in the area to use the lane
forever is composed entirely of nows

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #32 on: December 29, 2010, 05:56:10 pm »
Your point being?

Nothing political. I just find it inexplicable that two former presidents can't pronounce an easy word.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

Noe

  • Guest
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #33 on: December 29, 2010, 06:10:13 pm »
Nucular?

This whole train of thought on pronunciation reminded me of a comedy skit by Mel Brooks and Carl Riener.  I believe it was a series of comedy skits called "The 100 Year Old Man" and the premise was a man-on-the-street interview type of give and take.  Riener plays the part of the interviewer and Brooks the part of the 100 year old man.  Riener at one point asks the 100 year old man if he participated in World War II, to which the old man said "Yes, but I had a hard time at first trying to find the enemy.  You see, I listened to a Winston Churchill speech and he kept saying we had to defeat the "Narzies".  Narzies?  What Narzies?  Who the hell are these Narzies?  Where can I find them?".  The bit went on a while, and Brooks really laid into Churchill's idiosyncratic way of pronouncing words.

Funny.  Sacrilege.  But Funny.

ETA: Just looked it up, Brooks and Riener actually did a series about a 2000 year old man and they did ad-lib comedy about subjects, so it was not a 100 year old man as I remembered it.  But the idea is still the same, he made fun of Churchill and the way he pronounced words in some of his ad-libs.
« Last Edit: December 29, 2010, 06:15:45 pm by Noe in Austin »

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #34 on: December 29, 2010, 07:34:24 pm »
It's all a matter of degrees.
« Last Edit: December 29, 2010, 07:55:13 pm by Ron Brand »
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

SaltyParker

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1455
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #35 on: December 29, 2010, 09:14:26 pm »
talking about politics did you know the bikers (non motor) want to include a bike/pesditirian lane when they redo mopaq. claims of up to 10000 people livine and working in the area to use the lane

friggin lefties

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Lunacy in Politics
« Reply #36 on: December 29, 2010, 09:22:09 pm »
talking about politics did you know the bikers (non motor) want to include a bike/pesditirian lane when they redo mopaq. claims of up to 10000 people livine and working in the area to use the lane

10000 ppl the first week, 8000 the next (after the notoriously "courteous" Austin drivers polish off 2000 of them). And so on.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy