« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Michaels v. Abercrombie  (Read 1154 times)

OldBlevins

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 633
    • View Profile
Michaels v. Abercrombie
« on: April 02, 2009, 12:19:28 am »
Astros.com has Michaels as the likely fifth outfielder, instead of Abercrombie.  I know that position is kind of trivial, but does can anyone tell me why that choice? 
Logged
blah, blah, blah . . .

SaltyParker

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1455
    • View Profile
Re: Michaels v. Abercrombie
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2009, 01:45:08 am »
Quote from: OldBlevins on April 02, 2009, 12:19:28 am
Astros.com has Michaels as the likely fifth outfielder, instead of Abercrombie.  I know that position is kind of trivial, but does can anyone tell me why that choice? 
Because Michaels has a $750K guaranteed contract where as Abercrombie does not, would be my guess.
Logged

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: Michaels v. Abercrombie
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2009, 04:09:33 am »
I think that is the better choice anyway.
Logged
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Michaels v. Abercrombie
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2009, 07:18:46 am »
Because Abercrombie is a proven AAAA player who is a whiff king in the big leagues.
Logged
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius
Pages: [1]
« previous next »