Author Topic: Roster Speculation  (Read 2934 times)

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Roster Speculation
« on: February 11, 2009, 10:50:51 am »
The void gets voidier just before pitchers and catchers report.  Anyway, I could not refrain from a little speculation on the roster chances of the 57 players invited to MLST.

I figure that 16 spots are "locks":  Oswalt, Hampton, Rodriguez, Valverde, Geary, Hawkins, Byrdak, Wright, Lee, Bourn, Pence, Erstad, Berkman, Matsui, Tejada, Blum.

I also figure there is at least an even chance that they will carry three catchers ... possibly at the expense of a 5th outfielder, or less likely at the expense of a 12th pitcher.  That leaves my speculative 25-man roster with room for 2 starters, 2 (or maybe only 1) relievers, 3 catchers (or maybe only 2) and 2 other position players (or possibly 3).  My thoughts on the candidates:

Pitchers:
Sampson -- 95% chance; almost certainly in the bullpen, which assumes he is all the way back from surgery.
Moehler -- 90% chance of being the 4th starter  (or possibly the long/swing man in the pen).
Brocail -- 70% chance of making the pen; most likely to be booted from that role.
Backe -- 65% chance of making the rotation; most likely to be booted from that role
Hensley -- 20% chance of dislodging someone
Ortiz -- 10% chance ... probably as a starter
Arias -- 10% chance of making the bullpen
Norris, Nieve, Paulino -- 5% chance for each of them to make the rotation and a combined 5% for one of them to make the bullpen.
De la Vara, Lumsden -- 1-2% chance each to make the team; De la Vara gets a slight edge as a rule 5 pick.

Catchers:
Quintero -- 80%; leading candidate to start
Palmisano -- 70%; mostly on the basis of his rule 5 status, and one of the reasons I think they may carry 3 catchers
Hall, Towles -- 50% each; I see this as the 25/26 bubble position for the whole roster.

Infielders:
Boone -- 90%; his spot to loose, but I don't see him as a "lock"
Newhan -- 65%; most likely to be dislodged by one of the "kids", but his versatility and expereince give him the inside track
Sutton -- 30%; versatility gives him the edge among the rookies
Johnson -- 20%; a big spring could move him into a platoon with Blum at Boone's expense
Manzella -- 10%; most likely to be the full-time SS at RR to be recalled in case of emergency
Kata -- 5%; probably AAAA roster-filler
Saccomanno, Maysonet, Smith, Gall -- 1% each (and generous at that)

Outfielders:
Abercrombie -- 40%; most likely to make the roster if they go with only 2 catchers
Ramirez, Michaels -- 1-2% each (more evidence of generosity)

Chaff (AAAA players with no realistic shot):
Paronto, Capellan, Graves, Fulchino, Esposito

Kids (prospects on the 40-man with no realistic shot):
James, Perez, Gervacio, Trinidad, Bogusevic, Castro, Santangelo

Any interest in joining me in speculation??
« Last Edit: February 11, 2009, 10:53:04 am by VirtualBob »
Up in the Air

SaltyParker

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1455
    • View Profile
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2009, 10:56:51 am »
Brocail is a lock, and Byrdak is not.

Taras Bulba

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3988
    • View Profile
    • Wing Attack Plan R
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2009, 11:11:08 am »
Houston has a fairly solid AAAA squad.
Purity of Essence

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2009, 11:24:00 am »
Houston has a fairly solid AAAA squad.
Which is a reflection of the dirth of AAA prospects produced by the farm system in recent years (or at least a dirth of remaining prospects after trading away some of the likely candidates).
Up in the Air

pots

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4514
    • View Profile
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2009, 11:47:31 am »
I'm under the impression that Michaels (on the 40-man) is the leading candidate for the 5th outfielder spot rather than Abercrombie(not on 40-man, minor league contract).

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #5 on: February 11, 2009, 12:15:21 pm »
I'm under the impression that Michaels (on the 40-man) is the leading candidate for the 5th outfielder spot rather than Abercrombie(not on 40-man, minor league contract).
You may be right.  I would be interested in the source of your "impressions".  Seriously!

The way I see it, Michaels is on the 40-man to facilitate an easy assignment to RR coupled with an easy recall in case of emergency.  And, of course, he probably did not want to sign a minor league deal.  IMO, however, he is not likely to force the issue of whether to carry a 5th OF on opening day, and Abercrombie might.  Except for being the anti-Ensberg with his pitch selection, he has all the tools.
Up in the Air

CarolinaStro

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 284
    • View Profile
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2009, 12:36:12 pm »
I wouldn't characterize Capellan or S Perez's chances as zero.  Nor would I call W Wright a lock.  I could see a scenario where he loses a spot (perhaps due to someone else being out of options).  In any regard, it should make for an interesting ST this year.

Duman

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 5446
    • View Profile
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2009, 12:47:36 pm »
I don't think Palmisano's rule 5 status is that big of a factor.  If they send him back, it cost them 25K.  Not a very expensive proposition.  If the O's don't take him back, they are out 50K.  Still not an exensive proposition given the cost of a major league minimum salary.  I would reduce his chances to lower than Halls.  

Here is my take on catcher:
 Q is a lock
Towles - 50% if he has a descent spring hitting, he is there.
Hall - 50% if Towles doesn't have a descent spring hitting, and he is adequate, he is there.
Palmisano - 10% chance.  He only DH'd last season after rehabing. So he hasn't caught a game behind the plate since 2007.  

I don't see them carrying 3 catchers.  
Always ready to go to a game.

pots

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4514
    • View Profile
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #8 on: February 11, 2009, 01:01:06 pm »
You may be right.  I would be interested in the source of your "impressions".  Seriously!

The way I see it, Michaels is on the 40-man to facilitate an easy assignment to RR coupled with an easy recall in case of emergency.  And, of course, he probably did not want to sign a minor league deal.  IMO, however, he is not likely to force the issue of whether to carry a 5th OF on opening day, and Abercrombie might.  Except for being the anti-Ensberg with his pitch selection, he has all the tools.

Michaels is in the same situation as Boone.  Both have major league contracts and are on the 40-man.  I don't believe you can assign them to AAA without their consent and possibly waivers?

Where as Abercrombie is in a siimilar situation as Saccomanno.  They have minor league contracts should they make the major league team they would need to be added to the 40-man (meaning taking somebody off.

I would assume that if the club wanted Abercrombie on the team more than Michaels then Abercrombie would have been offered the major league contract and Michales the minor league one.

(Added note)
At the time the Astros signed Michaels, I doubt he would have accepted a minor league contract. 
« Last Edit: February 11, 2009, 01:04:45 pm by pots »

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #9 on: February 11, 2009, 01:02:58 pm »
I don't think Palmisano's rule 5 status is that big of a factor.  If they send him back, it cost them 25K.  Not a very expensive proposition.  If the O's don't take him back, they are out 50K.  Still not an exensive proposition given the cost of a major league minimum salary.  I would reduce his chances to lower than Halls.  

Here is my take on catcher:
 Q is a lock
Towles - 50% if he has a descent spring hitting, he is there.
Hall - 50% if Towles doesn't have a descent spring hitting, and he is adequate, he is there.
Palmisano - 10% chance.  He only DH'd last season after rehabing. So he hasn't caught a game behind the plate since 2007.  

I don't see them carrying 3 catchers.  


1.  That's the beauty of void speculation.  I do appreciate your insights.
2.  You actually have a 10% chance of carrying three catchers, which is admittedly a lot less than my 50%.
Up in the Air

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #10 on: February 11, 2009, 01:06:36 pm »
Brocail is a lock, and Byrdak is not.

Byrdak is a lock. i think Wright is too.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

moriartp

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3203
    • View Profile
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #11 on: February 11, 2009, 01:34:08 pm »
Palmisano - 10% chance.  He only DH'd last season after rehabing. So he hasn't caught a game behind the plate since 2007.  


For what it's worth, he did get in a pretty good amount of work behind the plate in the AFL.

Taras Bulba

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3988
    • View Profile
    • Wing Attack Plan R
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #12 on: February 11, 2009, 02:11:33 pm »
Wright throws, employing his left arm in the process.  He'll have to be found in his Kissimmee hotel room with either a dead girl or a live boy not to make the roster.  Towles should be able to find plenty of affordable homes in Williamson County.
Purity of Essence

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #13 on: February 11, 2009, 02:55:10 pm »
As far as the bullpen goes Valverde, Hawkins, Geary, Brocail, Wright, and Byrdak are locks barring injury.  Sampson is on the bubble and could get knocked out by Nieve, Paulino, or less likely Norris.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Russe

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 272
    • View Profile
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #14 on: February 11, 2009, 03:51:39 pm »
I could see Byrdak getting traded if one of the other lefties in camp (de la Vara, Lumsden) perform well, assuming there's still some teams out there in need of a lefty.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #15 on: February 11, 2009, 03:59:11 pm »
I could see Byrdak getting traded if one of the other lefties in camp (de la Vara, Lumsden) perform well, assuming there's still some teams out there in need of a lefty.

no way. he did a great job last year.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

ValpoCory

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2461
    • View Profile
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #16 on: February 12, 2009, 10:01:48 am »
Saccomanno, Maysonet, Smith, Gall -- 1% each (and generous at that)

At least in Astros lore, going deep in your first major league at bat is an inauspicious start.

Russe

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 272
    • View Profile
Re: Roster Speculation
« Reply #17 on: February 12, 2009, 12:27:17 pm »
no way. he did a great job last year.

No argument here that Byrdak did a fine job--I just feel that if De La Vara manages to make the roster (and that's a big "if"), it wouldn't make sense to carry him, Wright, and Byrdak, and Byrdak is more likely to be shopped than Wright, who's younger, cheaper, and under team control for a longer period.