The argument seems to be that the Astros are a quasi-governmental entity using quasi-public property to promote a particular religion. I suppose someone could look at the licensing agreement with the HSA to discover the details. What surprises me is that anyone is surprised by this at this late date.
Truth be told, I didn't know about this "Faith & Family" event until about a week ago, when the Astros announcers started saying "come here Lance's testimony" during the broadcasts. It bothers me that the
team is promoting a religous service, with a player taking a lead role in that service. The name of the event bothers me. Like it can't be a "family" event unless faith -- an in particular Christian faith -- is being promoted.
It's not a legal issue for me. I would just prefer that the "team" leave religion out of it. I know that a lot of the players on this team are devout Christians and the owner as well. But there is a difference in my mind between private player only prayer meetings and gigantic publicly promoted events. And I would be just as unhappy if they did a gigantic multi-religion day with Ganesh, Buddah, Alah, Jesus, and anyone else. (In fact, a day like that would make me more unhappy because those kind of events tend to trivialize religous beliefs even more.)
And I didn't know about the Easter services, but the fact that there was a religous service in the stadium doesn't bother me. Because that was just renting out the building to a group. If course, if my memory is wrong -- and the Astros were promoting the event and players were speaking, I would have been upset at that as well.
Again, it's not a legal issue. My ealier point about the public funding for the stadium was not to say that because the stadium is publicly funded, a religous event cannot take place there. It was just to point out that, contary to what a previous poster said, MMP is not entirely a private venture.
But as Jim said (and I don't quote him often), I have noted my objection. And now I'm moving on.