Author Topic: Not a bad first series  (Read 6904 times)

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Not a bad first series
« on: April 04, 2008, 02:56:22 am »
Sure, I wish we'd have split, but I saw some real good things out there, including the following:

No errors (but one or two kinda weak throws from the cutoff men)
Bourn can play CF
Very respectable bullpen over 10.2 innings of work
Tejada can hit; I like his approach
Towles is improving behind the plate
When the hitting was there, it was good
Cruz, Jr. is a good pickup
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

believin

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 303
    • View Profile
    • my website
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2008, 05:50:27 am »
Agree with the above observations.  On the defense, there was a play in the second game where the bases were loaded and a ball was hit to Wiggington.  He fumbled it a bit, missing the chance for a double play, but managed to recover quickly and get the out at home.  I wish he'd have been smoother on the DP ball, but at least it didn't unravel from there.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2008, 06:44:18 am »
Agree with the above observations.  On the defense, there was a play in the second game where the bases were loaded and a ball was hit to Wiggington.  He fumbled it a bit, missing the chance for a double play, but managed to recover quickly and get the out at home.  I wish he'd have been smoother on the DP ball, but at least it didn't unravel from there.

he did not fumble the ball. his foot slipped and he nearly fell. the TV guys discussed this play in detail the next night.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

remy

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2571
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #3 on: April 04, 2008, 08:12:53 am »
I agree that there were a lot of positives, but the fact that they were 1 strike away from a 4-game sweep is a little scary.  Oh well, hopefully they'll murder some baby bears this weekend.

lc_db

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 522
    • View Profile
    • I_dont_need_no_stinkin_homepage.com
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2008, 08:21:44 am »
...When the hitting was there, it was good...

Isn't this ALWAYS the case?

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2008, 09:44:50 am »
Isn't this ALWAYS the case?

Not necessarily. Maybe I should have been stronger in my praise. Anytime you can get four runs home against one of the premiere closers of all time with two out, that's some real clutch hitting. Cruz's AB was a thing of beauty.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #6 on: April 04, 2008, 10:18:43 am »
Berkman is having a better april than last year. if he keeps it going that iwll be a major plus also
forever is composed entirely of nows

lc_db

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 522
    • View Profile
    • I_dont_need_no_stinkin_homepage.com
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #7 on: April 04, 2008, 10:25:24 am »
Not necessarily. Maybe I should have been stronger in my praise. Anytime you can get four runs home against one of the premiere closers of all time with two out, that's some real clutch hitting. Cruz's AB was a thing of beauty.

I wasn't calling for more praise...  It was just a rather ambiguous perception.

Let's throw in... "When we get shut out... we lose."

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #8 on: April 04, 2008, 10:28:45 am »
he did not fumble the ball. his foot slipped and he nearly fell. the TV guys discussed this play in detail the next night.

Am I wrong in thinking he should have been set to throw when he fielded the grounder and shouldnt have had to reset?  He definitely caught his spike when he tried to set his back foot.

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #9 on: April 04, 2008, 10:33:08 am »
I agree that there were a lot of positives, but the fact that they were 1 strike away from a 4-game sweep is a little scary.  Oh well, hopefully they'll murder some baby bears this weekend.

They're always one strike away from something.  Isn't that implied in the "game with no clock"  stuff?  The Padres have better pitching than most of the NL and probably less hitting.  It's premature to make any judgments about either the Astros' pitching or hitting.   The only sure thing you can say is the team is, 4 down, 158 to go.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #10 on: April 04, 2008, 10:36:10 am »
The only sure thing you can say is the team is, 4 down, 158 to go.

I'll say for sure that they're trying to run more.  And I'm very happy to see Berkman showing some good judgement on the basepaths.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

das

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3465
    • View Profile
    • Faith Home Ministries
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #11 on: April 04, 2008, 10:38:20 am »
They're always one strike away from something.  Isn't that implied in the "game with no clock"  stuff?  The Padres have better pitching than most of the NL and probably less hitting.  It's premature to make any judgments about either the Astros' pitching or hitting.   The only sure thing you can say is the team is, 4 down, 158 to go.
No, no, the stats clearly reveal that, unless dramatic changes are made, this team is headed to a 40 win season.  Wins and losses is the only stat that truely matters.
Another trenchant comment by a jealous lesser intellect.

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #12 on: April 04, 2008, 10:39:41 am »
No, no, the stats clearly reveal that, unless dramatic changes are made, this team is headed to a 40 win season.  Wins and losses is the only stat that truely matters.

Have you chosen "the blatantly obvious" as your category of the day?

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #13 on: April 04, 2008, 10:40:24 am »
I'll say for sure that they're trying to run more.  And I'm very happy to see Berkman showing some good judgement on the basepaths.

Small sample.  Maybe it's simply that he's still bat-shit crazy but got lucky this series.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #14 on: April 04, 2008, 10:41:44 am »
Have you chosen "the blatantly obvious" as your category of the day?

Quote from: Basil Fawlty
Next contestant Sybil Fawlty; specialised subject "The Bleedin' Obvious!
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

das

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3465
    • View Profile
    • Faith Home Ministries
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #15 on: April 04, 2008, 10:42:22 am »
Have you chosen "the blatantly obvious" as your category of the day?
Yes.  Did you know that the sun rises in the east and the Cubs suck?
Another trenchant comment by a jealous lesser intellect.

Noe

  • Guest
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #16 on: April 04, 2008, 10:47:12 am »
"The Bleedin' Obvious!"

That would be a good name for my vanity column, if I ever got off my arse to start one.  I know for a fact if my wife ever read what I wrote as a columnista she would opine "Isn't that... ahum.... obvious?"

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #17 on: April 04, 2008, 10:50:57 am »
I wasn't calling for more praise...  It was just a rather ambiguous perception.

Let's throw in... "When we get shut out... we lose."


Perhaps you're incapable of perceiving my point? We hit the ball in one game of the four, but we would have lost that game too without real clutch hitting. This was my whole point, not that anyone else but you seems to have required it to be this spelled out.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

AtascAstro

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1092
  • 92 in 2011!
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #18 on: April 04, 2008, 11:02:55 am »
Kind of like the difference between El Papa Grande's approach/performance in the 8th vs 9th inning in the win.  One shouldn't ignore the run given up in the 8th, but it is very encouraging to see that killer instinct when the moment arrives as it did in the ninth.

Taras Bulba

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3988
    • View Profile
    • Wing Attack Plan R
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #19 on: April 04, 2008, 11:11:43 am »
That would be a good name for my vanity column, if I ever got off my arse to start one.  I know for a fact if my wife ever read what I wrote as a columnista she would opine "Isn't that... ahum.... obvious?"

Noe, for your vanity column what about something like, "I Shit Bigger Than Herman Melville."
Purity of Essence

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #20 on: April 04, 2008, 11:22:39 am »
Noe, for your vanity column what about something like, "I Shit Bigger Than Herman Melville."

how about "I write more words than William Shirer."
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

tophfar

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1049
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #21 on: April 04, 2008, 11:23:32 am »
how about "I write more words than William Shirer."

"James A. Michener is my bitch."
Here are just a few of the key ingredients: dynamite, pole vaulting, laughing gas, choppers - can you see how incredible this is going to be?

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #22 on: April 04, 2008, 11:27:04 am »
"James A. Michener is my bitch."

White space has about as much chance as blank paper in Stephen King's house.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #23 on: April 04, 2008, 11:29:20 am »
I vote for "Noe: Unabridged"
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #24 on: April 04, 2008, 11:31:45 am »
N.O.E. Tolkien
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #25 on: April 04, 2008, 11:40:21 am »
I vote for "Noe: Unabridged"

how about "Noe: Unedited"
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #26 on: April 04, 2008, 11:40:49 am »
Noelstoy
Goin' for a bus ride.

spatula

  • Clark
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #27 on: April 04, 2008, 11:56:17 am »
Gonna try and watch the game today, butt if it gets ugly, I rented Gorilla Lawn Bowling just in case.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #28 on: April 04, 2008, 11:57:03 am »
Gonna try and watch the game today, butt if it gets ugly, I rented Gorilla Lawn Bowling just in case.

Thanks for posting.  No need for post 2.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #29 on: April 04, 2008, 12:01:01 pm »
Gonna try and watch the game today, butt if it gets ugly, I rented Gorilla Lawn Bowling just in case.

You could start watching it at 1:30.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #30 on: April 04, 2008, 12:02:18 pm »
Thanks for posting.  No need for post 2.

No way.  I love seeing the name and rank "s Patula Clark".
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

homer

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6509
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #31 on: April 04, 2008, 12:32:10 pm »
Thanks for posting.  No need for post 2.

I blame the Secret Mission Douchebag.
Oye. Vamos, vamos.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #32 on: April 04, 2008, 12:43:00 pm »
I blame the Secret Mission Douchebag.

There will always be Clarks.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #33 on: April 04, 2008, 12:48:47 pm »
There will always be Clarks.

As stated in Genesis, I believe.
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

spatula

  • Clark
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #34 on: April 04, 2008, 12:50:26 pm »
That was pretty damn funny Limey. Let's hope Sampson doesn't get taken "downtown".
              

Towlie

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 264
  • Ahhh, Radiohead.
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #35 on: April 04, 2008, 01:01:38 pm »
I think they'll be ok this season. I thought Backe and Wandy looked good...especially Wandy because he was wasnt blowing up on the road like he would last year. Chacon has some nice stuff but he looks a bit too hittable for my liking, but he is a decent number 4.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #36 on: April 04, 2008, 01:04:28 pm »
That was pretty damn funny Limey. Let's hope Sampson doesn't get taken "downtown".
             

I have my moments.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #37 on: April 04, 2008, 01:06:04 pm »
I have my moments.

Unfortunately those moments no longer occur in Limey Time.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #38 on: April 04, 2008, 01:07:00 pm »
I think they'll be ok this season. I thought Backe and Wandy looked good...especially Wandy because he was wasnt blowing up on the road like he would last year. Chacon has some nice stuff but he looks a bit too hittable for my liking, but he is a decent number 4.

http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/COL/COL200706050.shtml
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Towlie

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 264
  • Ahhh, Radiohead.
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #39 on: April 04, 2008, 01:14:23 pm »
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/COL/COL200706050.shtml

I'm pretty sure you watched Wandy pitch last year and whenever he got into trouble on the mound on the road, he was noticeably rattled. I didn't see that this time, he looked more mature and more capable to get out of a rut. I felt good about what i saw from him.


damn you guys are so down on this team eventhough they played a very good team very well. We could have won all four games just as easily as we lost three of them. Just wait til our hitting really gets going.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #40 on: April 04, 2008, 01:21:59 pm »
Am I wrong in thinking he should have been set to throw when he fielded the grounder and shouldnt have had to reset?  He definitely caught his spike when he tried to set his back foot.


Not necessarily.  You have to plant your back foot to throw, and when he did it just went out from under him.  He has the presence to go ahead and get the out at home.  Just one of them things.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #41 on: April 04, 2008, 01:22:49 pm »

damn you guys are so down on this team . . ..

You're posting this in a thread titled "Not a bad first series"?
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Outlawscotty

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 932
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #42 on: April 04, 2008, 01:27:39 pm »
I have my moments.

toot, toot o King o' You Tube

Towlie

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 264
  • Ahhh, Radiohead.
    • View Profile
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #43 on: April 04, 2008, 01:47:43 pm »
You're posting this in a thread titled "Not a bad first series"?

Well, it was though I think we weren't expecting much more from them.

geezerdonk

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3342
  • a long tradition of existence
    • View Profile
Not a bad first series
« Reply #44 on: April 04, 2008, 02:05:47 pm »
That would be a good name for my vanity column
Some variant of "A la recerche du temps perdu" I think.
Proust of the TZ, purveyor of interminable, impenetrable prose.
E come vivo? Vivo.

believin

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 303
    • View Profile
    • my website
Re: Not a bad first series
« Reply #45 on: April 04, 2008, 10:23:23 pm »

Not necessarily.  You have to plant your back foot to throw, and when he did it just went out from under him.  He has the presence to go ahead and get the out at home.  Just one of them things.

Right.  My point in bringing it up was to say that it was good to see him keep his head in the game and get the runner at home, despite the trouble he had on the play.