Author Topic: Trade talk  (Read 28661 times)

Taras Bulba

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3988
    • View Profile
    • Wing Attack Plan R
Trade talk
« on: July 26, 2007, 04:27:51 pm »
Molony (www.mlb.com) says Mariners have scouted Jennings.  Also mentions that Dodgers are now looking for a starter.  Hmmm.
Purity of Essence

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2007, 04:29:12 pm »
Molony (www.mlb.com) says Mariners have scouted Jennings.

Well that should be the end of that, then.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2007, 04:29:14 pm »
Molony (www.mlb.com) says Mariners have scouted Jennings.  Also mentions that Dodgers are now looking for a starter.  Hmmm.

Tigers and Phillies have been following us, too. both need/want relievers.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

dirty steve

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 767
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk (Loretta)
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2007, 04:56:14 pm »
Loretta continues to be a popular target of many clubs — the Yankees, Padres, Red Sox, Twins and Tigers are among the others showing interest.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7056962


CarolinaStro

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 284
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #4 on: July 26, 2007, 05:09:20 pm »
Tigers and Phillies have been following us, too. both need/want relievers.

Phillies are supposedly after Lidge or Qualls with Houstonian Bourn on the table.

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #5 on: July 26, 2007, 05:33:39 pm »
Phillies are supposedly after Lidge or Qualls with Houstonian Bourn on the table.

The Bourn Conspiracy?  http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/rumors/post/Phils-give-Lidge-a-look?urn=mlb,40498
Up in the Air

Sleepy

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 335
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #6 on: July 26, 2007, 06:42:20 pm »
Bourn for Qualls seems like something Purpura would listen to.  Anyone have insight on Bourn?  From what I just read, he has great speed, a plus arm, but his offense has struggled.  However, he's improved his patience of late.  He seems like a good fit for the Astros, frankly.

Zac D

  • Roster Filler
  • Posts: 179
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #7 on: July 26, 2007, 07:55:09 pm »
Bourn for Qualls seems like something Purpura would listen to.  Anyone have insight on Bourn?  From what I just read, he has great speed, a plus arm, but his offense has struggled.  However, he's improved his patience of late.  He seems like a good fit for the Astros, frankly.

If Willy Taveras had been a heralded prospect through his whole minor-league career, he might have looked something like Michael Bourn. Bourn has gotten on base at every level and does have the blistering speed to go with it, but hasn't shown much power (or potential for it).

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #8 on: July 26, 2007, 09:20:41 pm »
According to Jayson Stark, via mlbtraderumors.com, the Astros are "yet to open shop on any of their relievers".
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #9 on: July 26, 2007, 10:42:18 pm »
According to Jayson Stark, via mlbtraderumors.com, the Astros are "yet to open shop on any of their relievers".
Yet, Footer says,
Quote
Purpura confirmed that the Astros have made trade proposals and have also received offers from other clubs...the Astros' biggest trading chips are Chad Qualls, Dan Wheeler and Brad Lidge. Lidge appears to be off the table, but the other two may be able to bring in quality players.

"It's a matter of what value can you get for the players you have, particularly players you have control over for more than a year. Those are valuable players. You're not going to just trade them for lesser players, just to make a deal. It's ridiculous."

The Link
So maybe what Stark meant was, The Astros have not agreed to give Lidge to the Yankees for nothing.

edit: forgot link
« Last Edit: July 26, 2007, 11:54:16 pm by Reuben »
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #10 on: July 26, 2007, 11:22:06 pm »
sorry, but Lidge should get more than an unproven prospect. some of y'all don't want me running your team.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #11 on: July 27, 2007, 01:19:34 am »
I watched Bourn for 3 years at UH.   The kid is Willie T fast, he is an absolutely fantastic fielder.   He played at MMPUS three times(college classic each Feb) and as a 18 yo freshman he made one of the better catches, running up Tal's Hill you will ever see.  He is PLUS PLUS defensive player, possesses Plus Plus Plus speed.      I know him and his parents, so I am obviously biased, that being said, I didnt expect him to advance in baseball this far this fast.

I would absolutely love to see him playing for the Astros, but considering what the Brewers just gave up for Linebrink, I would hope the Astros would get more than just Michael.    He would definitely, imo, be a great starting point.   Maybe MB and a fairly highly thought of A or AA pitcher.

   





There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #12 on: July 27, 2007, 08:21:02 am »
sorry, but Lidge should get more than an unproven prospect. some of y'all don't want me running your team.

What did Hun get for Wagner?
Goin' for a bus ride.

Trey

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1249
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #13 on: July 27, 2007, 08:24:48 am »
What did Hun get for Wagner?

Duckworth (who had been up and down from The Show at the time), Buchholtz (AA, IIRC), and I think someone else.
Let me explain something to you. Um, I am not "Mr. Lebowski". You're Mr. Lebowski. I'm the Dude. So that's what you call me. You know, that or, uh, His Dudeness, or uh, Duder, or El Duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #14 on: July 27, 2007, 08:32:30 am »
Duckworth (who had been up and down from The Show at the time), Buchholtz (AA, IIRC), and I think someone else.

I know.  A swingman pitcher, a AA/AAA level top prospect (Buchholz), and A/AA level midling prospect (at the time of the trade), Zeke Astacio.  That was my point.  Hun couldn't get anything better than an unproven prospect and lesser others for Wagner (Buchholz was the centerpiece).  Purp's not going after a contract year player like Beltran so he won't get a high quality established player in any deal for Lidge.  That's just one reason he won't deal Lidge.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Taras Bulba

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3988
    • View Profile
    • Wing Attack Plan R
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #15 on: July 27, 2007, 08:45:30 am »
What did Hun get for Wagner?

Pettitte, Clemens, and Beltran.
Purity of Essence

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #16 on: July 27, 2007, 08:48:53 am »
What did Hun get for Wagner?

A notable jump in team IQ.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

mihoba

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6840
  • R.I.P. Mike. The boy inside you is now free.
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #17 on: July 27, 2007, 08:53:05 am »
A notable jump in team IQ.

The Hun also had Lidge waiting in the wings, quite unlike the current scenario.
"Baseball is simply a better game without the DH. "

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #18 on: July 27, 2007, 08:54:46 am »
The Hun also had Lidge waiting in the wings, quite unlike the current scenario.

Actually I think it was Dotel in that wing.

Froback

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2253
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #19 on: July 27, 2007, 10:17:47 am »
I know.  A swingman pitcher, a AA/AAA level top prospect (Buchholz), and A/AA level midling prospect (at the time of the trade), Zeke Astacio.  That was my point.  Hun couldn't get anything better than an unproven prospect and lesser others for Wagner (Buchholz was the centerpiece).  Purp's not going after a contract year player like Beltran so he won't get a high quality established player in any deal for Lidge.  That's just one reason he won't deal Lidge.
While I am sure you know, just thought I would point out Wagner was traded during the offseason and not at the deadline.  Your best chance to get more than you are giving up is at the deadline.  The real questions are can Tim find the "right" deal, and can he pull the trigger when he does?

BTW, I am not in the trade Lidge camp.  This was more in the area of any trade, not a Lidge trade.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #20 on: July 27, 2007, 11:13:53 am »
Bourn for Qualls seems like something Purpura would listen to.  Anyone have insight on Bourn?  From what I just read, he has great speed, a plus arm, but his offense has struggled.  However, he's improved his patience of late.  He seems like a good fit for the Astros, frankly.

It sounds good to me...the Astros need a true CF to roam the expanses at MMPUS.  I wouldn't give up Lidge, but Qualls or Wheeler might do it.
Grab another Coke and let's die

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #21 on: July 27, 2007, 11:25:35 am »
The Bourn Conspiracy?  http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/rumors/post/Phils-give-Lidge-a-look?urn=mlb,40498

Why deal for him at all?  I haven't followed Bourn, but from what I hear we already have him.  Josh Anderson.
Goin' for a bus ride.

mihoba

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6840
  • R.I.P. Mike. The boy inside you is now free.
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #22 on: July 27, 2007, 11:36:21 am »
Why deal for him at all?  I haven't followed Bourn, but from what I hear we already have him.  Josh Anderson.

After watching the Phillies a few games, I'll bet Bourn is the speediest player in MLB right now. Is Anderson that fast?
"Baseball is simply a better game without the DH. "

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #23 on: July 27, 2007, 11:37:20 am »
After watching the Phillies a few games, I'll bet Bourn is the speediest player in MLB right now. Is Anderson that fast?

JA is fast but it is not a track meet. i'd like someone who can hit.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #24 on: July 27, 2007, 11:39:26 am »
JA is fast but it is not a track meet. i'd like someone who can hit.

And, Bourn's never shown to be any better with the bat than Anderson.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #25 on: July 27, 2007, 11:42:20 am »
After watching the Phillies a few games, I'll bet Bourn is the speediest player in MLB right now. Is Anderson that fast?

It's a confined space to patrol, not a track meet.  You just have to run fast enough to get the ball.  Anderson is very fast; fast enough to get the ball.
Goin' for a bus ride.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #26 on: July 27, 2007, 11:54:21 am »
Do either of them actually know how to run the bases?  It's a talent distinctly lacking here in Houston.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

mihoba

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6840
  • R.I.P. Mike. The boy inside you is now free.
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #27 on: July 27, 2007, 11:55:44 am »
It's a confined space to patrol, not a track meet.  You just have to run fast enough to get the ball.  Anderson is very fast; fast enough to get the ball.

Or fast enough to beat out a routine grounder.

I don't know anything else about Bourn, like his arm or defense. I can see from his minor league seasons that he has struck out alot. Career minor league OBP of .372. I mentioned speed because he has stolen 163 bases in the minors, and was caught 28 times. 85% success. His speed disrupts everything.

He's 15-1 stealing for the Phillies.
"Baseball is simply a better game without the DH. "

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #28 on: July 27, 2007, 11:58:44 am »
Do either of them actually know how to run the bases?  It's a talent distinctly lacking here in Houston.

Irrelevent.  Infliction rates of the 2007 Houston Astros baserunning skills via osmosis is impossible to predict.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #29 on: July 27, 2007, 11:59:14 am »
Or fast enough to beat out a routine grounder.

I don't know anything else about Bourn, like his arm or defense. I can see from his minor league seasons that he has struck out alot. Career minor league OBP of .372. I mentioned speed because he has stolen 163 bases in the minors, and was caught 28 times. 85% success. His speed disrupts everything.

He's 15-1 stealing for the Phillies.

Then Anderson's fast enough.
Goin' for a bus ride.

mihoba

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6840
  • R.I.P. Mike. The boy inside you is now free.
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #30 on: July 27, 2007, 12:09:47 pm »
Then Anderson's fast enough.

I just looked up Anderson's numbers. I'll shut up now.

(I had no idea he had that many SB's)
"Baseball is simply a better game without the DH. "

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #31 on: July 27, 2007, 12:13:53 pm »
I just looked up Anderson's numbers. I'll shut up now.

(I had no idea he had that many SB's)

He's Wile E. Taveras on speed.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #32 on: July 27, 2007, 12:18:13 pm »
I just looked up Anderson's numbers. I'll shut up now.

(I had no idea he had that many SB's)

Comparing stat for stat suggests Anderson might be marginally better than Bourn with the bat.

The Astros really have no need for Bourn, IMO.
Goin' for a bus ride.

mihoba

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6840
  • R.I.P. Mike. The boy inside you is now free.
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #33 on: July 27, 2007, 12:21:35 pm »
Comparing stat for stat suggests Anderson might be marginally better than Bourn with the bat.

The Astros really have no need for Bourn, IMO.

After further (sight unseen) research, I have to agree.
"Baseball is simply a better game without the DH. "

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #34 on: July 27, 2007, 12:26:58 pm »
After further (sight unseen) research, I have to agree.

They compare almost identically.  Ironically, Anderson was drafted just 4 picks after than Bourn.  I wouldn't be surprised if the Astros had intended to draft Bourn if he had fallen to them.  They had picked him, around 20th round, as a high school senior in 2000, I believe.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Bob Sakamano

  • Disappointing Rookie
  • Posts: 82
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #35 on: July 27, 2007, 12:54:32 pm »
After further (sight unseen) research, I have to agree.

I'm not sure. I've always heard plate discipline was an issue for Anderson, and his minor league OBP is consistently in the .330 range (except for the first part of 2004 in Lexington). Bourn's minor league OBP is .371, if I remember correctly. To me, that's a sizable difference. I'm not saying that's enough to make the trade worthwhile, but I'd say he's a more disciplined hitter.

That said, Anderson seems to have more extra-base potential, so maybe that evens things out.

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #36 on: July 27, 2007, 01:09:48 pm »
Bourn's arm is solid and more than adequate for CF.    He is a superb base runner, he isnt just a speed guy.    He is very smooth 1st the third which is one reason he gets an inordinate amount of triples.   He continued with the triple barrage in the minors racking up 36 in under 400 games.

FYI, he was drafted in the 19th round out of HS.

There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #37 on: July 27, 2007, 01:13:43 pm »
I'm not sure. I've always heard plate discipline was an issue for Anderson, and his minor league OBP is consistently in the .330 range (except for the first part of 2004 in Lexington). Bourn's minor league OBP is .371, if I remember correctly. To me, that's a sizable difference. I'm not saying that's enough to make the trade worthwhile, but I'd say he's a more disciplined hitter.

That said, Anderson seems to have more extra-base potential, so maybe that evens things out.

His minor league OBP is .378.  But, it's bolstered by a career year in 04, his first full season, where he had a .433 OBP.

They're both gap-power, at most, hitters and Bourn's been more likely to take a walk while Anderson's been a little more likely to get a hit.  Not worth dealing for IMO.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #38 on: July 27, 2007, 01:24:57 pm »
I havent seen JA play, but if he is good as Bourn, I wish he would have been called up instead of Lane.   
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

Taras Bulba

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3988
    • View Profile
    • Wing Attack Plan R
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #39 on: July 27, 2007, 01:29:28 pm »
I havent seen JA play, but if he is good as Bourn, I wish he would have been called up instead of Lane.   

Could be that Lane is being put on display a little, in hopes of restoring value.  He looks pretty solid patrolling center and is, as we speak, swinging the bat fairly well.
Purity of Essence

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #40 on: July 27, 2007, 01:31:49 pm »
Could be that Lane is being put on display a little, in hopes of restoring value.  He looks pretty solid patrolling center and is, as we speak, swinging the bat fairly well.

My thought was that he'd impressed Purp enough with his hitting at RR to deserve another shot at getting back in the club's good graces.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #41 on: July 27, 2007, 01:33:39 pm »
My thought was that he'd impressed Purp enough with his hitting at RR to deserve another shot at getting back in the club's good graces.

That, and injuries to both a starting outfielder and a starting infielder.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #42 on: July 27, 2007, 01:35:47 pm »
My thought was that he'd impressed Purp enough with his hitting at RR to deserve another shot at getting back in the club's good graces.

40-man restrictions, possibly?
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #43 on: July 27, 2007, 01:37:45 pm »
That, and injuries to both a starting outfielder and a starting infielder.

Nah.  Anderson can outrun Lane.  Lane can out-power Anderson.  They're both left-handed and can play the same positions.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #44 on: July 27, 2007, 01:38:57 pm »
40-man restrictions, possibly?

Nope.  They're both on the 40-man.

Another possiblity is major league experience.  Maybe Purp doesn't want to entertain another rookie outfielder right now.

Also Lane's a better option to PH.
Goin' for a bus ride.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #45 on: July 27, 2007, 01:52:01 pm »
I havent seen JA play, but if he is good as Bourn, I wish he would have been called up instead of Lane.   

no way.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Froback

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2253
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #46 on: July 27, 2007, 01:53:03 pm »
no way.
Which part are you refering to, JA = Bourn or JA instead of Lane?

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #47 on: July 27, 2007, 02:01:08 pm »
Nope.  They're both on the 40-man.

Another possiblity is major league experience.  Maybe Purp doesn't want to entertain another rookie outfielder right now.

Also Lane's a better option to PH.

And then there is the fact that Lane is simply a whole lot more mature and a whole lot better.  I doubt if anyone who has watched Anderson thinks he is ready for anything other than PR and defensive replacement duty in the bigs at this point.  A little more plate discipline and a little more ability to consistently put the ball in play, and he might get a shout at 5th OF in '08 or '09.  Might.

Lane has the potential for being a 4th OF or even part-time starter if he can adjust.  He's either worthless (and in particular worth less than Anderson) if he continues to struggle, or he is capable of adding value as trade bait, or *maybe* even as an Astro in '08, and it is time to figure out which.  Even if you (non-specific) think he is worthless, he is not likely to play any worse this year than Anderson, so (it seems to me) it is worth giving him the shot.
Up in the Air

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #48 on: July 27, 2007, 02:05:56 pm »
Which part are you refering to, JA = Bourn or JA instead of Lane?

Anderson instead of Lane.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #49 on: July 27, 2007, 02:07:11 pm »
My thought was that he'd impressed Purp enough with his hitting at RR to deserve another shot at getting back in the club's good graces.

exactly right, imo
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Noe

  • Guest
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #50 on: July 27, 2007, 02:09:24 pm »
Actually I think it was Dotel in that wing.

And Hun was over a barrel because teams knew that Wagner was no longer going to be an Astro the way he shot off his mouth.  Hun made chicken salad out of chicken... well you know what.  Overall, if the Astros were to show they were "desperate" or had an owner who "ordered" Lidge to be trade (see: trading deadline, 2006), then you'll get shite for offers and they have you *IF* you have to trade.

In this case, no one has ever said trade Brad Lidge at any cost, except maybe the Comical Boys and their consituency.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #51 on: July 27, 2007, 02:10:53 pm »
exactly right, imo

Then it's settled.  No need to even ask Purp now.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Noe

  • Guest
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #52 on: July 27, 2007, 02:14:33 pm »
Then it's settled.  No need to even ask Purp now.

JA had some problems in High A Ball and his first foray into AA that would concern anyone.  He's done enough to turn around his game, but Michael Bourn has been more than impressive in his limited major league time.  He has that over JA and that is no small item.

Either way, the Astros need a CF and leadoff hitter for today and the coming years.  Bourn fits that criteria more than JA who is still trying to prove himself as a player in the minors.

JackAstro

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3824
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #53 on: July 27, 2007, 02:35:36 pm »
Nah.  Anderson can outrun Lane.  Lane can out-power Anderson.  They're both left-handed and can play the same positions.

Not that it matters, I guess (this whole Bourn/Anderson/Lane thing has me thoroughly confused) but are you talking about Lane throwing left-handed? What does that have to do with it?
"We live in a society of laws. Why do you think I took you to all those Police Academy movies? For fun? Well, I didn't hear anybody laughing, did you?"
Say hi on the Twitter

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #54 on: July 27, 2007, 02:41:23 pm »
Not that it matters, I guess (this whole Bourn/Anderson/Lane thing has me thoroughly confused) but are you talking about Lane throwing left-handed? What does that have to do with it?

Limey mentioned injuries in both the outfield and infield.  I presumed he meant that Lane could play first as well as the outfield positions.  As they're both left-handed they'd be able to handle the same positions.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Froback

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2253
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #55 on: July 27, 2007, 02:47:38 pm »
Limey mentioned injuries in both the outfield and infield.  I presumed he meant that Lane could play first as well as the outfield positions.  As they're both left-handed they'd be able to handle the same positions.
I think they are confused.  Lane bats Right-handed, but throws left-handed for those who didn't know.

JackAstro

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3824
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #56 on: July 27, 2007, 02:51:38 pm »
I think they are confused.  Lane bats Right-handed, but throws left-handed for those who didn't know.

No, I know that, I didn't realize Jacksonian was referring to Lane/Anderson at first rather than the OF.
"We live in a society of laws. Why do you think I took you to all those Police Academy movies? For fun? Well, I didn't hear anybody laughing, did you?"
Say hi on the Twitter

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #57 on: July 27, 2007, 02:54:34 pm »
My thought was that he'd impressed Purp enough with his hitting at RR to deserve another shot at getting back in the club's good graces.

Was he ever out of their "good graces"?  Other than the production issue I mean.  He's the only guy this season who got sent down who didn't piss and moan, that I know about.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #58 on: July 27, 2007, 03:01:40 pm »
Was he ever out of their "good graces"?  Other than the production issue I mean.  He's the only guy this season who got sent down who didn't piss and moan, that I know about.

Production was the only reference point for good graces.  I never heard that he had a bad attitude either.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Noe

  • Guest
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #59 on: July 27, 2007, 03:12:48 pm »
Was he ever out of their "good graces"?  Other than the production issue I mean.  He's the only guy this season who got sent down who didn't piss and moan, that I know about.

Are you talking about Josh Anderson or Jason Lane?

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #60 on: July 27, 2007, 03:15:11 pm »
Are you talking about Josh Anderson or Jason Lane?

Lane.
Goin' for a bus ride.

mihoba

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6840
  • R.I.P. Mike. The boy inside you is now free.
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #61 on: July 27, 2007, 03:20:41 pm »
Was he ever out of their "good graces"?  Other than the production issue I mean.  He's the only guy this season who got sent down who didn't piss and moan, that I know about.

Bruntlett was moaning about no other club wanting him, but that wasn't quite the level of the Burke moan, was it?
"Baseball is simply a better game without the DH. "

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #62 on: July 27, 2007, 03:23:07 pm »
Bruntlett was moaning about no other club wanting him, but that wasn't quite the level of the Burke moan, was it?

I thought it was Bruntlett moaning about the Loretta signing.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

Noe

  • Guest
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #63 on: July 27, 2007, 03:24:54 pm »
Yes.

Burke = complained about being sent down.
Burntlett = complained about being lied too (re: Loretta signing)
Lane = wondered out loud why no other club claimed him.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #64 on: July 27, 2007, 03:26:27 pm »
I thought it was Bruntlett moaning about the Loretta signing.

Both. Though I wouldn't equate Bruntlett feeling down because every other club passed him up with Burke's "they never really gave me a fair shot" routine.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #65 on: July 27, 2007, 03:34:06 pm »
Lane = wondered out loud why no other club claimed him.

To be fair to Lane, he seemed to be expressing out loud what it meant to have been passed over by every major league team.  Twice.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #66 on: July 27, 2007, 03:59:11 pm »
Both. Though I wouldn't equate Bruntlett feeling down because every other club passed him up with Burke's "they never really gave me a fair shot" routine.

The Chronicle sends one of their ghouls to whisper sympathetic questions to the recently or soon to be departed, they sent Lopez shuffling over to Bruntlett during ST and got him to say this,  "They talk about defense," Bruntlett said. "In baseball in general, I think it's a lot of talk. We'll see by the end of the month how important it is." Link

Noe

  • Guest
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #67 on: July 27, 2007, 04:15:13 pm »
To be fair to Lane, he seemed to be expressing out loud what it meant to have been passed over by every major league team.  Twice.

Yes. That is what I meant, Lane didn't bitch as much as remark about his own wake-up call that he passed through waivers easily.

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #68 on: July 27, 2007, 04:32:59 pm »
JA had some problems in High A Ball and his first foray into AA that would concern anyone.  He's done enough to turn around his game, but Michael Bourn has been more than impressive in his limited major league time.  He has that over JA and that is no small item.

Either way, the Astros need a CF and leadoff hitter for today and the coming years.  Bourn fits that criteria more than JA who is still trying to prove himself as a player in the minors.

I cant speak to the JA portion, but I completely agree with you on Bourn.   He is getting it done on the MLB level.    If the Astros move Qualls, i think MB would be a good starting point for talks.
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

Noe

  • Guest
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #69 on: July 27, 2007, 04:39:43 pm »
I cant speak to the JA portion, but I completely agree with you on Bourn.   He is getting it done on the MLB level.    If the Astros move Qualls, i think MB would be a good starting point for talks.

I like Bourn, a lot... so I'm probably as biased as you are.  But overall, I would not consider it a bad trade at all.  Leadoff hitters in the major leagues is a very important and rarely found commodity.  With Rollins in Philly and Rowand patrolling the CF area, Bourn is blocked and here is an opportunity (IMHO of course).

I think Josh Anderson has had ups and downs at important minor league stops for my own taste to say he's much more than an Orlando Palmiero type of major leaguer in the making right now.  Maybe a little higher, say a Podsednick type.  But I just think Bourn has a higher cieling and definitely a starter for the major leagues at this point.

It all depends what Purpura thinks if the risk is in his favor to pull the trigger.  Plus if he is overpaying with Qualls.  This may be a trade that garners a little more in terms of a low minor league add-on if The Count can angle it right.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2007, 04:41:51 pm by Noe in Austin »

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #70 on: July 27, 2007, 05:18:38 pm »
I like Bourn, a lot... so I'm probably as biased as you are.  But overall, I would not consider it a bad trade at all.  Leadoff hitters in the major leagues is a very important and rarely found commodity.  With Rollins in Philly and Rowand patrolling the CF area, Bourn is blocked and here is an opportunity (IMHO of course).

I think Josh Anderson has had ups and downs at important minor league stops for my own taste to say he's much more than an Orlando Palmiero type of major leaguer in the making right now.  Maybe a little higher, say a Podsednick type.  But I just think Bourn has a higher cieling and definitely a starter for the major leagues at this point.

It all depends what Purpura thinks if the risk is in his favor to pull the trigger.  Plus if he is overpaying with Qualls.  This may be a trade that garners a little more in terms of a low minor league add-on if The Count can angle it right.

what i said "not i" to was Lidge for Bourn.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Noe

  • Guest
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #71 on: July 27, 2007, 05:28:41 pm »
what i said "not i" to was Lidge for Bourn.

Yeah, I agree on that one.  Even Qualls for Bourn may be a little much given the club control Qualls has attached to him.  This is not a Larry Anderson for Jeff Bagwell trade, but I think to discount Michael Bourn because of Josh Anderson is really deflating how good Bourn looks right now.  Is he going to develop more and more?  What I've seen is exciting and I think it may be worth making such a deal.  Purpura doesn't want prospects, he wants someone who plays now and is going to be here for years to comes.  Bourn fits that bill.

dirty steve

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 767
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #72 on: July 27, 2007, 06:06:02 pm »
San Diego acquired utility man Scott Hairston from D-Backs, per 790 am.

Uncle Charlie

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1072
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #73 on: July 27, 2007, 06:23:32 pm »
San Diego acquired utility man Scott Hairston from D-Backs, per 790 am.

Hairston is actually worse than Giles right now.  This one doesn't make any sense.
The test of a true champion is how he reacts to adversity on days when it is bound to come.

Matt

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3578
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #74 on: July 27, 2007, 07:12:06 pm »
Except Scott Hairston is an outfielder.

Uncle Charlie

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1072
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #75 on: July 27, 2007, 07:31:09 pm »
Except Scott Hairston is an outfielder.

Hairston was a 2B for most of his minor league career.  He was moved to OF becuase of Counsel being there in 2005, then Hudson in 2006.
The test of a true champion is how he reacts to adversity on days when it is bound to come.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #76 on: July 27, 2007, 10:11:31 pm »
Hairston was a 2B for most of his minor league career.  He was moved to OF becuase of Counsel being there in 2005, then Hudson in 2006.
Right, but I think the point is it probably does not preclude the Pads from maybe dealing for Loretta. That said, I don't know what their 4th/5th OF situation is really.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

dirty steve

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 767
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk (Loretta asking price?)
« Reply #77 on: July 28, 2007, 01:50:48 am »
Red-hot commodity
Jul 27 - ESPN.com's Amy Nelson reports that the Houston Astros are fielding offers for second baseman Mark Loretta, but according to a baseball source, Houston is seeking as many as three prospects from teams like the Padres and Mets, a price too high for the 35-year-old second baseman.
http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/features/rumors

Matt

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3578
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #78 on: July 28, 2007, 01:58:32 am »
Hairston was a 2B for most of his minor league career.  He was moved to OF becuase of Counsel being there in 2005, then Hudson in 2006.
He hasn't played 2B in the majors since 2004 so therefore he's an outfielder and most likely there to give them outfield depth.

Matt

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3578
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk (Loretta asking price?)
« Reply #79 on: July 28, 2007, 01:59:49 am »
Red-hot commodity
Jul 27 - ESPN.com's Amy Nelson reports that the Houston Astros are fielding offers for second baseman Mark Loretta, but according to a baseball source, Houston is seeking as many as three prospects from teams like the Padres and Mets, a price too high for the 35-year-old second baseman.
http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/features/rumors
It all depends on how bad they think they need Loretta.

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk (Loretta asking price?)
« Reply #80 on: July 28, 2007, 09:38:25 am »
It all depends on how bad they think they need Loretta.
could also depend on who the three prospects are
forever is composed entirely of nows

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Trade talk (Loretta asking price?)
« Reply #81 on: July 28, 2007, 09:58:28 am »
could also depend on who the three prospects are

Prospects, not suspects.

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #82 on: July 28, 2007, 10:04:48 am »
Speaking of red hot....


Quote

No Utley, no problem for Phils in rout
Bourn (four hits) leads offensive assault in rain-shortened win
.
.
.
The final product included Michael Bourn, a name frequently mentioned in trade rumors, batting leadoff.

If Bourn was unknowingly auditioning for a new role elsewhere, he nailed it. He had a career-high four hits in as many at-bats, scored twice and stole his 17th base of the season.

He hit three different types of pitches off three different pitchers while filling in for everyday center fielder Aaron Rowand, who hurt his shoulder playing tag with neighborhood kids and is day-to-day.

Bench coach Jimy Williams told Bourn early Friday that he had a chance to start, and the 24-year-old made the most of it.

"I had a good day today," Bourn said. "That's all I can say."

Bourn said Thursday he had no idea his name had been mentioned as a possible dealing piece. He reiterated on Friday that he hadn't even bothered to look at any rumors.

"It's out of my hands," he said.




http://philadelphia.phillies.mlb.com/news/gameday_recap.jsp?ymd=20070727&content_id=2112954&vkey=recap&fext=.jsp&c_id=phi
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #83 on: July 28, 2007, 10:44:09 am »
odds and ends

Phillies special assistant Charley Kerfeld scouted the Houston Astros on Friday night, likely watching relievers Chad Qualls, Dan Wheeler and Brad Lidge.
http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070728/SPORTS01/707280379/1002/SPORTS

The Astros want outfielder Michael Bourn, whom the Phillies are reluctant to deal.
http://philadelphia.phillies.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20070727&content_id=2112968&vkey=news_phi&fext=.jsp&c_id=phi

The Yankees have been trying to get Wigginton from Tampa Bay for at least a week, and have spoken about using relief pitcher Scott Proctor as the bait.

(Mets) not thrilled about the idea of Houston's Chad Qualls or Dan Wheeler, but if the Astros made Brad Lidge available, they would jump in with both feet

The Mariners are in on every available starting pitcher, and several pitchers who aren't. Aiming super-high, they've bugged the Marlins about Dontrelle Willis, the White Sox about Jon Garland and even tried to see if the Yankees were putting Andy Pettitte on the market. They're liable to get somebody, but it isn't likely to be somebody anywhere near that good. The latest talk has them hot on the trail of Houston's Jason Jennings....
http://www.nj.com/sports/ledger/index.ssf?/base/sports-2/1185617364281220.xml&coll=1

Rosenthal
The Braves, according to major-league sources, have made the Rangers a whopper of an offer for first baseman Mark Teixeira. The Angels, sources say, also have submitted a substantial bid.

From the Braves, the Rangers would receive three highly regarded young players — catcher Jarrod Saltalamacchia, Class AA left-hander Matt Harrison and Class A shortstop Elvis Andrus — while giving up only Teixeira.

...Wheeler, a free agent after next season, would cost the least in talent. The Rockies, in particular, are targeting him as a possible addition.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7065740

Uncle Charlie

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1072
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk (Loretta asking price?)
« Reply #84 on: July 28, 2007, 12:40:05 pm »
Red-hot commodity
Jul 27 - ESPN.com's Amy Nelson reports that the Houston Astros are fielding offers for second baseman Mark Loretta, but according to a baseball source, Houston is seeking as many as three prospects from teams like the Padres and Mets, a price too high for the 35-year-old second baseman.
http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/features/rumors

I have a hard time believing that Houston would ask for 3 prospects for Loretta unless they see him as their starting 2B next year.
The test of a true champion is how he reacts to adversity on days when it is bound to come.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk (Loretta asking price?)
« Reply #85 on: July 28, 2007, 12:48:41 pm »
I have a hard time believing that Houston would ask for 3 prospects for Loretta unless they see him as their starting 2B next year.

Or, Purp knows full well they need a 2b that can hit and Loretta is the best hitter at that position available.  Add to that it's only the 28th and Purp has 3 more days to make one of them flinch.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Matt

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3578
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #86 on: July 28, 2007, 12:56:57 pm »
He hit three different types of pitches off three different pitchers while filling in for everyday center fielder Aaron Rowand, who hurt his shoulder playing tag with neighborhood kids and is day-to-day.
I wonder if one of those neighborhood kids was Lance Berkman

BUWebguy

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2118
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #87 on: July 28, 2007, 12:58:15 pm »
Will Carroll's latest:
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=6511

Quote
Melky Cabrera to the Astros for one of their relievers? That's possible.
"If you can't figure out that Astros doesn't have an apostrophe, you shouldn't be able to comment." - Ron Brand, June 9, 2010

Matt

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3578
    • View Profile

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #89 on: July 28, 2007, 02:23:44 pm »
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

Matt

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3578
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #90 on: July 28, 2007, 02:49:10 pm »
What is his downside?
He doesn't have much power at all which would be fine except his OBP isn't that great either and he doesn't steal many bases.  Light hitting and no speed.  He's not bad defensively though and is a switch hitter.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #91 on: July 28, 2007, 03:07:05 pm »
He doesn't have much power at all which would be fine except his OBP isn't that great either and he doesn't steal many bases.  Light hitting and no speed.  He's not bad defensively though and is a switch hitter.

He has good at bats, for the most part, but is a singles/doubles hitter at best. Decent defensive player, he can play adequate center but is better suited to the corner spots.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

MRaup

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11432
  • The goddamn Germans ain't got nothin to do with it
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #92 on: July 28, 2007, 03:12:46 pm »
He has good at bats, for the most part, but is a singles/doubles hitter at best. Decent defensive player, he can play adequate center but is better suited to the corner spots.

Nobody would know who he was if he didn't play for the Yankees.
"Terrorists, Sam. They've taken over my stomach and they're demanding beer." - Norm.

"Your words yield destruction, sorrow and are meant just to hate and hurt..." - Das

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #93 on: July 28, 2007, 03:15:06 pm »
Nobody would know who he was if he didn't play for the Yankees.

Very true. And the Yankees really covet/overvalue him. I kind of cringed when I saw his name come up wondering what the price would be.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

legs_of_eggs

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 620
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #94 on: July 28, 2007, 03:34:51 pm »
Very true. And the Yankees really covet/overvalue him. I kind of cringed when I saw his name come up wondering what the price would be.


I think Abreu is a FA next year and theyll let him walk and plug in melky. I read they're shopping Johnny Damon too though so I dont know what theyre thinking.

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #95 on: July 28, 2007, 03:39:02 pm »
They're thinking that Abreu and Damon are done and for the most part, they're right.

True that Melky doesn't have much power - CFs in general these days don't have a whole lot - but he's got speed and his OBPs are in the .340-.370 range and he's only 22.  I don't know much about his defense but he doesn't seem to be a bad guy to pick up if the cost isn't too high.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

astrofan

  • Clark
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #96 on: July 28, 2007, 05:48:30 pm »
looks like we traded Wheeler for Wigginton
"Short dont mean shit about tough.  In fact.  There is a saying that is very profound, never try to intimidate a small person.  They have no choice, they have to kill you."

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #97 on: July 28, 2007, 05:52:25 pm »
looks like we traded Wheeler for Wigginton
source?
forever is composed entirely of nows

cougar

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1318
  • I dare you
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #98 on: July 28, 2007, 05:56:36 pm »
ESPNews "Breaking News" box at the moment.

JSAstrosFan

  • Disappointing Rookie
  • Posts: 99
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #99 on: July 28, 2007, 06:10:19 pm »
Just found the Wheeler/Wigginton trade here

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #100 on: July 28, 2007, 06:14:07 pm »
If I remember correctly Wheeler lives in Tampa. Maybe this will please him.

loganck

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 526
    • View Profile


dirty steve

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 767
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #103 on: July 28, 2007, 06:26:58 pm »
If I remember correctly Wheeler lives in Tampa. Maybe this will please him.
they caught him after the game and he mentioned he just built a house in the Tampa area.  I believe his father in law is D-Rays broadcaster Dewayne Staats.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #104 on: July 28, 2007, 07:06:18 pm »
they caught him after the game and he mentioned he just built a house in the Tampa area.  I believe his father in law is D-Rays broadcaster Dewayne Staats.

Considering the circumstances which brought him to Houston, kudos to Wheels for his major league trades working well for his personal life.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #105 on: July 28, 2007, 07:45:19 pm »
Interesting that BP's Similarity Index has Wigginton's two closest comps to be Doug Rader and Sean Berry, and his #5 comp is Morgan Ensberg.  And #10 is Charlie Hayes.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #106 on: July 28, 2007, 07:48:15 pm »
If he could play the hot corner like the Rooster we'd have something.

dirty steve

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 767
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk (Dotel to Braves)
« Reply #107 on: July 30, 2007, 03:07:53 pm »
The Braves could be on the verge of not only acquiring the best hitter on the trade market, but one of the best relievers as well.
In addition to reaching a preliminary agreement for Rangers first baseman Mark Teixeira, the Braves are close to a deal for Royals closer Octavio Dotel, according to major-league sources.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7074020

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #108 on: July 30, 2007, 03:11:46 pm »
God help me, I think I'm pulling for the Braves, just so the Mets get jacked.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #109 on: July 30, 2007, 03:20:08 pm »
God help me, I think I'm pulling for the Braves, just so the Mets get jacked.

Get thee to confession.  Immediately.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #110 on: July 30, 2007, 03:35:14 pm »
God help me, I think I'm pulling for the Braves, just so the Mets get jacked.
stop and think who the astros are playing next and go do every single rally ever invented by man (including those wiht live chickes, snakes and other things not mentionable on this site) then invent a few more of yout own
forever is composed entirely of nows

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #111 on: July 30, 2007, 03:35:46 pm »
stop and think who the astros are playing next and go do every single rally ever invented by man (including those wiht live chickes, snakes and other things not mentionable on this site) then invent a few more of yout own

what isn't mentionable on this site?
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

Froback

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2253
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #112 on: July 30, 2007, 03:37:44 pm »
what isn't mentionable on this site?
I can't mention it here.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #113 on: July 30, 2007, 03:40:10 pm »
I can't mention it here.

Ladies and gentlemen, your next Attorney General!
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

dirty steve

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 767
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #114 on: July 30, 2007, 03:49:51 pm »
God help me, I think I'm pulling for the Braves, just so the Mets get jacked.
my loathing of the Braves wained a bit after we eliminated them in 2004 and 2005.  but some still remains after having to watch nothing but Braves games when stationed in Savannah from 1996-1999.

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Trade talk (Dotel to Braves)
« Reply #115 on: July 30, 2007, 03:50:15 pm »
The Braves could be on the verge of not only acquiring the best hitter on the trade market, but one of the best relievers as well.
In addition to reaching a preliminary agreement for Rangers first baseman Mark Teixeira, the Braves are close to a deal for Royals closer Octavio Dotel, according to major-league sources.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7074020

When the Braves were sold earlier this season there was some concern that they would stagnate because the new owners weren't going to spend money.  Concern was unfounded looks like.

dirty steve

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 767
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk (Dotel to Braves)
« Reply #116 on: July 30, 2007, 03:53:02 pm »
When the Braves were sold earlier this season there was some concern that they would stagnate because the new owners weren't going to spend money.  Concern was unfounded looks like.
i think this would signal that they wont attempt to resign Andruw Jones in the offseason, maybe looking to the trade route to acquire another OF.  i'd think their focus would be on getting Teixeira locked up, even though Boras wont allow Teixeira to sign anything long term before next offseason.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #117 on: July 30, 2007, 03:54:01 pm »
You don't use Scott Boras if you're looking for an extension.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Froback

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2253
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk (Dotel to Braves)
« Reply #118 on: July 30, 2007, 03:55:56 pm »
When the Braves were sold earlier this season there was some concern that they would stagnate because the new owners weren't going to spend money.  Concern was unfounded looks like.
Don't be so sure.  If Andruw walks after this season, Teixeira will just fill that salary slot.  He is still under club control for 1 more year, albeit arbitration year.

If they go and sign Andruw THEN you can say they are sheding that idea.

Froback

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2253
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #119 on: July 30, 2007, 03:57:01 pm »
You don't use Scott Boras if you're looking for an extension.
I actually think he was quoted the other day about someone else and an extension and his response was something along the lines of "What is an extension?", IOW "I don't do those."

dirty steve

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 767
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #120 on: July 30, 2007, 03:58:08 pm »
You don't use Scott Boras if you're looking for an extension.
has andruw jones been hurt by that tactic this year?

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #121 on: July 30, 2007, 04:04:52 pm »
has andruw jones been hurt by that tactic this year?

Boras would argue he was hurt by extending the first time.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #122 on: July 30, 2007, 04:24:17 pm »
Boras would argue he was hurt by extending the first time.

Extending was easier than hitting the weight room.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

dirty steve

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 767
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk (Gagne to Boston)
« Reply #123 on: July 31, 2007, 01:14:11 pm »
The Red Sox are on the verge of winning the Eric Gagne sweepstakes, pending his approval and a review of his medical records, according to major-league sources.
Gagne must waive his no-trade clause to Boston for the deal to be completed. It is possible the Red Sox will allow him to share the closer's role with Jonathan Papelbon.
The Rangers would receive right-hander Kason Gabbard and an additional player or players in the deal, sources say.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7072074

BUWebguy

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2118
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #124 on: July 31, 2007, 04:42:01 pm »
The Pirates traded for Matt Morris???
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7078266
"If you can't figure out that Astros doesn't have an apostrophe, you shouldn't be able to comment." - Ron Brand, June 9, 2010

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #125 on: July 31, 2007, 04:49:32 pm »
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #126 on: July 31, 2007, 08:12:18 pm »
Amazing.

Matt Morris has to be gob smacked.  The other thing is they neglected to trade Nancy, Link

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Trade talk
« Reply #127 on: July 31, 2007, 08:35:06 pm »
Matt Morris has to be gob smacked.  The other thing is they neglected to trade Nancy, Link

Yeah, his quote sounded like something from a man in shock.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy