Author Topic: Santana  (Read 4555 times)

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Santana
« on: June 19, 2007, 07:58:31 pm »
I really don't get much of a chance to watch Johan since the Twins are in Central time and I'm usually watching the Astros while the Twins are playing.

Everyone knows how awesome the guy is, but he's really really fun to watch.

He's mowing down the steM in HD right now.  It's must-see-TV.  Oh, and it's 9-0 Twins.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2007, 08:06:21 pm »
What station is this?  I can't find it in Austin.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2007, 08:13:50 pm »
What station is this?  I can't find it in Austin.

Ch 94 on DirecTV.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2007, 08:24:05 pm »
Ahh, that would explain it. I'm on TimeWarner cable.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

mihoba

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6840
  • R.I.P. Mike. The boy inside you is now free.
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2007, 08:26:25 pm »
Not Ks thru 8 complete? Wow, the steM are hitting it anyway.
"Baseball is simply a better game without the DH. "

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2007, 08:26:58 pm »
Not Ks thru 8 complete? Wow, the steM are hitting it anyway.

He's quite intentionally pitching to contact tonight.  He's thrown 81 pitches thru 8.

otterjb

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1110
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #6 on: June 20, 2007, 01:47:34 am »
That guy was once an Astro. Angers me just to think about it.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Santana
« Reply #7 on: June 20, 2007, 09:22:58 am »
That guy was once an Astro. Angers me just to think about it.

you poor thing.

ok, today give me a list of Astros players in high A or lower who should be protected from Rule 5 when they are possible selections.

then give me the same list of AA players.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #8 on: June 20, 2007, 09:30:04 am »
That guy was once an Astro. Angers me just to think about it.

Hey, at least we didn't trade him away for one low minor prospect who never amounted to anything. 

Which is exactly what the Marlins did with him after they got him from us.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #9 on: June 20, 2007, 09:31:44 am »
Hey, at least we didn't trade him away for one low minor prospect who never amounted to anything. 

Which is exactly what the Marlins did with him after they got him from us.

See also Abreu, Bobby.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

WulawHorn

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1484
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #10 on: June 20, 2007, 11:30:27 am »
See also Abreu, Bobby.

Apples and oranges on the abreu comparison- he was advanced enough for the astros to be able to project with some amount of certainty that he'd be a good major leaguer. Why the DRays decided they just had to have Kevin Stocker is beyond me.

Can't cry about Santanna- that's a no way you can figure it out without a time machine situation.

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Santana
« Reply #11 on: June 20, 2007, 11:31:28 am »
Apples and oranges on the abreu comparison- he was advanced enough for the astros to be able to project with some amount of certainty that he'd be a good major leaguer. Why the DRays decided they just had to have Kevin Stocker is beyond me.

Can't cry about Santanna- that's a no way you can figure it out without a time machine situation.

I think the Astros projection on Abreu was that he was going to be a horse's ass.

WulawHorn

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1484
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #12 on: June 20, 2007, 11:53:47 am »
I think the Astros projection on Abreu was that he was going to be a horse's ass.

not altogether wrong either. I never faulted them for Doggy over abreau- I didn't get why Derek Bell was protected, but I was never a big DB fan.


otterjb

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1110
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #13 on: June 20, 2007, 11:54:04 am »
you poor thing.

ok, today give me a list of Astros players in high A or lower who should be protected from Rule 5 when they are possible selections.

then give me the same list of AA players.

Wasn't blaming the organization at all. It just would've been amazing to have Oswalt and Santana at the top of the staff for years. Of course: hindsight, spilt milk, lemonade, vodka, cheerios, polka, meth, bingo, streaking and Charlie Kerfeld. Ehh, my train of thought kinda trailed off there.

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Santana
« Reply #14 on: June 20, 2007, 11:58:56 am »
not altogether wrong either. I never faulted them for Doggy over abreau- I didn't get why Derek Bell was protected, but I was never a big DB fan.



Proven major leaguer, 2 seasons removed from hitting over .300.  Of course, if they were so good as spotting a horse's ass, why didn't they see that coming.

WulawHorn

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1484
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #15 on: June 20, 2007, 12:04:37 pm »
Proven major leaguer, 2 seasons removed from hitting over .300.  Of course, if they were so good as spotting a horse's ass, why didn't they see that coming.


True that. I thought it was apparent that DB was on a downslide at the time of the expansion draft. But he still had 100 RBI's the year before. Of course with biggio being such a stud and hitting in front of Bags he also had about 3 billion chances to drive in those 100 runs. It was the worst 100 RBI season I've ever witnessed.


Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #16 on: June 20, 2007, 12:05:42 pm »

True that. I thought it was apparent that DB was on a downslide at the time of the expansion draft. But he still had 100 RBI's the year before. Of course with biggio being such a stud and hitting in front of Bags he also had about 3 billion chances to drive in those 100 runs. It was the worst 100 RBI season I've ever witnessed.



Bell sucked.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #17 on: June 20, 2007, 02:57:08 pm »
Apples and oranges on the abreu comparison- he was advanced enough for the astros to be able to project with some amount of certainty that he'd be a good major leaguer. Why the DRays decided they just had to have Kevin Stocker is beyond me.

Can't cry about Santanna- that's a no way you can figure it out without a time machine situation.

I was referring to the fact that the Astros get slammed for not keeping Abreu, yet [team x who I forget] who took him under Rule 5 turned right around and traded him for a shortstop (IIRC), who they cut a year later (IIRC), and they get off scot free.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Andyzipp

  • Guest
Re: Santana
« Reply #18 on: June 20, 2007, 02:58:10 pm »
I was referring to the fact that the Astros get slammed for not keeping Abreu, yet [team x who I forget] who took him under Rule 5 turned right around and traded him for a shortstop (IIRC), who they cut a year later (IIRC), and they get off scot free.

There are so many things to criticize Tampa Bay about, it kind of gets lost in the mix.

Ty in Tampa

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 9111
  • You just gotta keep livin' man, L-I-V-I-N
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #19 on: June 20, 2007, 02:58:43 pm »
There are so many things to criticize Tampa Bay about, it kind of gets lost in the mix.

I was just going to post that.
"You want me broken. You want me dead.
I'm living rent-free in the back of your head."

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #20 on: June 20, 2007, 03:01:03 pm »
There are so many things to criticize Tampa Bay about, it kind of gets lost in the mix.

Ahhhhh, Tampa Bay.  Thanks.

And the SS in question was Kevin Stocker.  Spent two years with the Rays before being DFA's and picked up by the Angles, for whom he was sub-Mendoza.  That was that.
« Last Edit: June 20, 2007, 03:05:24 pm by Limey »
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

WulawHorn

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1484
    • View Profile
Re: Santana
« Reply #21 on: June 20, 2007, 03:27:05 pm »
Ahhhhh, Tampa Bay.  Thanks.

And the SS in question was Kevin Stocker.  Spent two years with the Rays before being DFA's and picked up by the Angles, for whom he was sub-Mendoza.  That was that.

I already acknowledged that in my post 10 above re Kevin Stocker and the DRAYS- if that's the part you were comparing to then spot on- but I don't expect/hope for competence from other org's GM's, just those of the teams I root for.