Sort of interesting. So is the takeaway that the Astros are just way better at shifting then the rest? If so, great, but it probably isn't sustainable over time because if there is a secret, the other clubs will presumably figure it out.
I would like to see a deeper analysis of how hard grounders are hit vs. slugging % on grounders. They pointed out how the results were so different between the White Sox and the Astros even when both team induced weaker grounders compared to the league. Maybe the Astros are good shifters and the White Sox are shitty shifters, but I would be curious to see league wide if there is an advantage to inducing weak groundouts. Would seem obvious that there is, but maybe not.