That article was almost a persuasive essay on why Houston should NOT trade for another corner OF. Maybe I'm wrong but the only needs I see, where Houston doesn't have at least 1 or 2 internal options with some level of proven success, is pitching. And that assumes that Houston doesn't think Zeke and Wandy can hold down the tail end of the rotation.
In that regard, the most valuable commodity they have to gain pitching is.... PITCHING. How does it make sense to trade pitching to get pitching?
Yeah yeah, everyone is pointing out the anemic offense. It was the biggest team weakness last season, and most likely will be the same this coming season. However, I don't see where they can upgrade any offensive production at any position without completely blowing away the current roster and making drastic changes. Do they obtain a starting 1B? Nope, not until Bagwell's situation is resolved as him definitely unable to play. Outfield? If Bagwell comes back, Berkman is in LF. Do you dump Lane? Cost-benefit wise, it doesn't make sense. Willy? Only if you believe the second half is more indicative of his future production.
2B, SS, 3B, and Catcher are all locked down. I like this team. They play solid defense, run out solid to good to great pitching almost every game. Could they use more run production? Absolutely. What position does he play and who do they lose to get it done? And is anyone certain that Burke, Scott, and the other players in the system won't be able to handle the task?