I think it's interesting that the Mavericks have finished near the top of the league each of the last few years, and the only team that they're favorably compared to is the Knicks. I'll be the first to admit I don't follow the NBA closely. It actually took me awhile to figure out who the grizzly Canadian was. But I'm smart enough to recognize where the Mavericks were before Cuban purchased the team, and where they are today. In other words, you can't trick me into thinking they suck, or that somehow Mark Cuban shouldn't be considered one of the top owners in the NBA.
I say the comparison to the Mets is baseless because Cuban has been very successful (outside of reality television), while the Mets have not (though they have appeared to turn a corner). I don't know where this notion of Cuban the idiot came from. Actually, I probably do. We see him officiating for the Harlem Globetrotters, arguing with referees on the court, and serving blizzards at Dairy Queen. To say the least, he's not exactly a conventional owner. But I also doubt there is an owner who is more popular in his market than Cuban; that there is a team that's had a larger resurgence in popularity than the Mavericks.
Now, pravata brings up the painfully appropriate question: does this mean anything in baseball? I have no idea. Maybe it doesn't. But, I'd rather not find out. Everything the guy touches seems to turn to gold. I'd rather he not do it again with the Pirates, and have to look up at them in the standings for the first time in a billion years. Or even worse, entertain the possibility that Cam Bonifay could return.