Author Topic: Question about Game 3 9th inning  (Read 3524 times)

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Question about Game 3 9th inning
« on: October 28, 2005, 05:32:05 pm »
Sorry if this has already been discussed; I was out of town on Wednesday and several million posts went by without my notice.

In the bottom of the 9th, Burke made his way to third and Biggio was walked, bringing Willy T's spot to the plate.  I thought at that point that Garner would hit for Willy, probably with Palmeiro: that would bring a veteran with more plate discipline, plus the righty-lefty matchup would be in his favor.  Either he would get to face Hernandez (El Duque was still pitching at the time, right?), or Guillen would have to make a change.  It was apparent that if the #2 spot didn't get on base, Berkman would almost certainly be walked in order to get to MoBerg and the potential double play.  And Willy seemed like a pretty likely strikeout against the Hernandez sliders.

But Garner obviously went with Willy, so I've been trying to figure out why.  If he hit Palmeiro for Willy but they still didn't get the run in, he'd be forced to use somebody else in CF.  Presumably that would be Burke, with Palmeiro going to LF, which doesn't seem that awful.  But I guess that's more of a defensive risk than Garner wanted to assume if the game went into extra innings.  Is there something else I'm overlooking?

And I sure hope Willy spends the winter working with somebody on bunting to the 1B side.  If he could ever learn to bunt hard between P and 1B, I don't think they'd ever get him out.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2005, 05:34:50 pm »
As I recall, there were no outs and Willy had hit better than anyone but Berkman in the series.  Anything put into play, even a double play ball, was likely to get Burke home.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

Savage

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 962
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2005, 05:39:31 pm »
Quote:

As I recall, there were no outs and Willy had hit better than anyone but Berkman in the series.  Anything put into play, even a double play ball, was likely to get Burke home.




There was 1 out already.  My father and I had the same thought.  Willy had been having a TERRIBLE day and all we needed was a fly ball.  OP seemed a better candidate for that situation.  I actually felt after Willy's K that we would eventually lose the game - you can't let opportunities like that go by against such a quality opponent and expect to win.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2005, 05:40:40 pm »
Quote:

As I recall, there were no outs and Willy had hit better than anyone but Berkman in the series.  Anything put into play, even a double play ball, was likely to get Burke home.




The problem with this thinking, IMO though:  You've got the winning run on 3B, less than 2 out.  The infield is in.  Anything but a strikeout or a groundball wins the game.  Who is the player on your team least likely to hit the ball deep in the air and most likely to either strikout out or hit the ball on the ground?  Willy Taveras.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2005, 05:42:17 pm »
Quote:

As I recall, there were no outs and Willy had hit better than anyone but Berkman in the series.  Anything put into play, even a double play ball, was likely to get Burke home.




I guess I discounted that.  I had no confidence in his ability to put the ball in play in that situation, but that's my problem, not theirs.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2005, 05:44:16 pm »
Quote:

Sorry if this has already been discussed; I was out of town on Wednesday and several million posts went by without my notice.

In the bottom of the 9th, Burke made his way to third and Biggio was walked, bringing Willy T's spot to the plate.  I thought at that point that Garner would hit for Willy, probably with Palmeiro: that would bring a veteran with more plate discipline, plus the righty-lefty matchup would be in his favor.  Either he would get to face Hernandez (El Duque was still pitching at the time, right?), or Guillen would have to make a change.  It was apparent that if the #2 spot didn't get on base, Berkman would almost certainly be walked in order to get to MoBerg and the potential double play.  And Willy seemed like a pretty likely strikeout against the Hernandez sliders.

But Garner obviously went with Willy, so I've been trying to figure out why.  If he hit Palmeiro for Willy but they still didn't get the run in, he'd be forced to use somebody else in CF.  Presumably that would be Burke, with Palmeiro going to LF, which doesn't seem that awful.  But I guess that's more of a defensive risk than Garner wanted to assume if the game went into extra innings.  Is there something else I'm overlooking?

And I sure hope Willy spends the winter working with somebody on bunting to the 1B side.  If he could ever learn to bunt hard between P and 1B, I don't think they'd ever get him out.





This is game 3.  Palmeiro was available.  The bunt wasn't on after the 1st pitch because Hernandez was so wild.  Taveras lead the team in BA for the series .349., however in that game he was 0-4 at the time.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2005, 05:47:13 pm »
in the 9th:

one out
Burke walked
Burke went to second on an errant pickoff
Burke stole third
Biggio walked
Taveras Ked swinging at everything, including bad pitches
Berkman walked
Ensberg left 'em stranded by striking out.



El Duque was very wild, and that wound up hurting us. he tried to pitch to Biggio, which i thought would win the game for us. then Willy had no discipline whatsoever. Hernandez was all over the place.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2005, 05:48:42 pm »
a double play ball ends the inning, Neil. there was one out. i thought you were keeping score.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2005, 05:51:12 pm »
Yeah, but I threw away my scorecard. That's why I need to keep score.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2005, 05:51:21 pm »
Quote:

in the 9th:

one out
Burke walked
Burke went to second on an errant pickoff
Burke stole third
Biggio walked
Taveras Ked swinging at everything, including bad pitches
Berkman walked
Ensberg left 'em stranded by striking out.



El Duque was very wild, and that wound up hurting us. he tried to pitch to Biggio, which i thought would win the game for us. then Willy had no discipline whatsoever. Hernandez was all over the place.





There were a couple pitches close that Biggio could've done something with.  Just needed a ball in play anywhere.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #10 on: October 28, 2005, 05:52:48 pm »
Quote:

El Duque was very wild, and that wound up hurting us. he tried to pitch to Biggio, which i thought would win the game for us. then Willy had no discipline whatsoever. Hernandez was all over the place.



Willy has shown little discipline all season.  I think Gar was playing for Willy to get a hit or at least beat out a DP, perhaps thinking that El Dookie would groove him something rahter than face Berkman with the sacks juiced.  One of Gar's famed gut calls; you win some...
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #11 on: October 28, 2005, 05:54:32 pm »
Quote:

There were a couple pitches close that Biggio could've done something with.  Just needed a ball in play anywhere.



So did Ensberg.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #12 on: October 28, 2005, 05:57:02 pm »
Was that the inning when Ashby was apparently complaining about Biggio not going after a couple of pitches?
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #13 on: October 28, 2005, 05:59:25 pm »
Quote:

Was that the inning when Ashby was apparently complaining about Biggio not going after a couple of pitches?



No idea, I was drunk and watching on TV.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #14 on: October 28, 2005, 06:01:12 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

As I recall, there were no outs and Willy had hit better than anyone but Berkman in the series.  Anything put into play, even a double play ball, was likely to get Burke home.




The problem with this thinking, IMO though:  You've got the winning run on 3B, less than 2 out.  The infield is in.  Anything but a strikeout or a groundball wins the game.  Who is the player on your team least likely to hit the ball deep in the air and most likely to either strikout out or hit the ball on the ground?  Willy Taveras.





I always thought that was Dierker's thinking when brought in Truby.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #15 on: October 28, 2005, 06:02:42 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

There were a couple pitches close that Biggio could've done something with.  Just needed a ball in play anywhere.



So did Ensberg.





Ensberg needed a basehit with 2 outs.  We'd've had a story had he done it.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #16 on: October 28, 2005, 06:08:58 pm »
Quote:

Ensberg needed a basehit with 2 outs.  We'd've had a story had he done it.



Basehit or walk.  He got a couple of Ponson-fat pitches but missed 'em.  C'est la vie.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

WulawHorn

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1484
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #17 on: October 28, 2005, 07:37:06 pm »
Moberg fouled back two hanging sliders, and swung at two pitches well outside the zone.  Had he let El Duque implode by not swinging the bat he probably walks.

Matt

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3578
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #18 on: October 29, 2005, 02:12:18 pm »
I'm pretty sure the pitches Ensberg swung and missed on were fat sliders right in the middle of the plate.

At Ease

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 336
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #19 on: October 29, 2005, 03:59:48 pm »
I'm glad others had the same thought I had during the game, about PH'ing for WT.  I think Garner did a great job all year, but I think he made a mistake there.

I can empathize with not wanting to take out a hitter who's running hot at the plate and who you'd like to keep in CF, but an inexperienced slap-hitter with poor plate discipline is the last thing you want in the box to face a wild (but veteran) pitcher with a runner on 3rd and one out.  Palmeiro, particularly with his .500 lifetime BA against El Duque, would have been a great choice.

cc

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 949
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #20 on: October 29, 2005, 06:13:29 pm »
I actually thought, during the 18-inning game with ATL, we would lose the game after failing in the 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th and 17th.  They kept failing to do anything with opportunities.  

The White Sox failed repeatedly as well to put the Astros away.  In fact, they probably had as many failures as the Astros.  They just happened to have 4 more successes.

Garner had pinch hit for Willy repeatedly over the past few months.  He has never hesitated to do so when he felt the situation warranted.
"I'm against the knee-jerk dismissal of knee-jerk reactions."

HurricaneDavid

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1775
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #21 on: October 29, 2005, 11:33:05 pm »
Quote:

The White Sox failed repeatedly as well to put the Astros away.  In fact, they probably had as many failures as the Astros.  They just happened to have 4 more successes.




Yet, if you believe some of the mediots, the Astros were never in the series.
"Ground ball right side, they're not gonna be able to turn two OR ARE THEY, THROW, IS IN TIME!!! WHAT AN UNBELIEVABLE TURN BY BRUNTLETT AND EVERETT, AND THEY CUT DOWN MABRY TO END THE GAME, AND THE ASTROS LEAD THIS NATIONAL LEAGUE CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES THREE GAMES TO ONE!!!!!"

ASTROCREEP

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 773
    • View Profile
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #22 on: October 30, 2005, 07:13:15 pm »
I thought this was the ONLY questionable call Garner made all through the playoffs.

Then again if Wily can atleast manage to hit a chopper somewhere and he beats out the double play by a step, then Garner is a genious.
Chuck Norris once ate three 72 oz. steaks in one hour. He spent the first 45 minutes having sex with his waitress.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Question about Game 3 9th inning
« Reply #23 on: October 31, 2005, 10:45:16 am »
they would not even try for a DP. the infield was in.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.