i'm right with you guys on this one. when i saw this article, i went straight to espn's stats section and looked at their percentage of save opportunities converted, which i would take to be the real measure of a closer's worth. the fact that izzy has more saves than lidge is completely irrelevant to the discussion. OF COURSE HE DOES, the cards give many more save opportunities.
anyhow, over the 2004 and 2005 regular seasons, izzy is 86 saves for 97 opportunites, which is an 88.7% rate. lidge, however, is 71 saves for 79 opportunities, which is an 89.9% rate. i know this a BS stat, but to me it means lidge is more reliable, and has outperformed isringhausen.
speaking of performance, over the last two seasons lidge has just over 14 K/9IP as opposed to izzy's 8 K/9IP and an ERA of 2.06 compared to izzy's 2.55. i'm no stat genius, but i do have a kick ass shower head that's kinda like the ones at holiday inn express. i'd take lidge a hundred times over before i took izzy if they ever gave me a team, which, of course...they wouldn't.