Author Topic: Stanton  (Read 17118 times)

toddthebod

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3385
    • View Profile
Stanton
« on: November 30, 2017, 10:09:50 am »
I've been thinking a lot about Stanton recently.  And this post echoes a lot of what is going on in my head.

https://climbingtalshill.com/2017/11/29/to-stanton-or-not-to-stanton/

I believe that Stanton will opt out of his contract after 2020.  Which means three years of paying his admittedly ridiculous salary.  But those three years largely coincide with the window for many of the current Astros stars.

Would Stanton go to Houston?  It's not LA (which may be his top choice), but who wouldn't want to come to Houston right now.  It's a fun team that just won the world series and is in a position to win for the next several years.

Stanton batting cleanup for this team.  Good god. 

So who would you trade to get Stanton?  Fisher obviously goes.  With Stanton, Fisher is totally unnecessary.  I would trade Martes as well.  And one of Reed, Davis, Moran.  And I would take all of the Stanton money.

The Dodgers are apparently not interested because they don't want to go over the luxury tax.  Same for the Yankees.  Stanton may not be interested in San Francisco because they suck.  He apparently doesn't want to go to St. Louis.  This situation is rip for Luhnow to come in and make a tremendous deal.     
Boom!

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2017, 10:53:03 am »
3 (18, 19, 20) years of...

Springer
Bregman
Altuve
Stanton
Correa
Yuli
Reddick

Would be pretty ridiculously awesome.
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #2 on: November 30, 2017, 12:34:38 pm »
3 (18, 19, 20) years of...

Springer
Bregman
Altuve
Stanton
Correa
Yuli
Reddick

Would be pretty ridiculously awesome.

LHers would likely call-in sick the day they were due to face that lineup.

toddthebod

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3385
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2017, 01:28:37 pm »
I think the Astros could probably offer much less than what I suggested.

According to John Morosi, the Marlins would accept offer of Panik, Beede and Shaw for Stanton alone -- if #SFGiants committed to paying at least $250 million of the $295 million left on Stanton’s contract.

Boom!

subnuclear

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6116
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #4 on: November 30, 2017, 03:03:07 pm »
Here is Stanton's home run spray chart. Put in Minute Maid for proper drooling.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #5 on: November 30, 2017, 04:13:29 pm »
I think the Astros could probably offer much less than what I suggested.

According to John Morosi, the Marlins would accept offer of Panik, Beede and Shaw for Stanton alone -- if #SFGiants committed to paying at least $250 million of the $295 million left on Stanton’s contract.

Houston can beat that without trying hard and not sacrifice depth.
Goin' for a bus ride.

BlownRanger

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 661
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #6 on: December 01, 2017, 09:32:07 am »
According to John Morosi, the Marlins would accept offer of Panik, Beede and Shaw for Stanton alone -- if #SFGiants committed to paying at least $250 million of the $295 million left on Stanton’s contract.

They were making fun of that report on the MLB Network last night, noting that the Marlins would accept pretty much anything from any organization that agrees to take on 85% of Stanton's salary, and they considered Panik, Beede, and Shaw to be a decent package (Beede and Shaw are #2 and #3 Giants prospects).

I don't think there's much chance of Houston pursuing Stanton, but if they do, I'd expect them to take the "better prospects/less of the salary" approach assuming they intend to extend some of the currently controllable talent on the club.  And assuming Stanton is going to opt out doesn't sound like a Luhnow type of gamble to me.




"He hit that one right up the poop chute, Bill" - Enos Cabell

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #7 on: December 01, 2017, 09:37:58 am »
They were making fun of that report on the MLB Network last night, noting that the Marlins would accept pretty much anything from any organization that agrees to take on 85% of Stanton's salary, and they considered Panik, Beede, and Shaw to be a decent package (Beede and Shaw are #2 and #3 Giants prospects).

I don't think there's much chance of Houston pursuing Stanton, but if they do, I'd expect them to take the "better prospects/less of the salary" approach assuming they intend to extend some of the currently controllable talent on the club.  And assuming Stanton is going to opt out doesn't sound like a Luhnow type of gamble to me.

Crane is on the record as saying the Astros are one of the few teams which can take on Stanton’s contract.

As always, the Astros’ plans and activities are a deep, dark secret. No clue as to what Luhnow is doing other than speculation Gattis may be non-tendered or tendered and traded. Surely Fiers will be non-tendered.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2017, 09:39:36 am by JimR »
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Ty in Tampa

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 9111
  • You just gotta keep livin' man, L-I-V-I-N
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #8 on: December 01, 2017, 09:39:41 am »
And assuming Stanton is going to opt out doesn't sound like a Luhnow type of gamble to me.

It seems entirely anti-Luhnow to me.
"You want me broken. You want me dead.
I'm living rent-free in the back of your head."

Duke

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1247
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #9 on: December 01, 2017, 11:00:48 am »
Have y'all heard what kind of teammate Stanton is?

Duke

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1247
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #10 on: December 01, 2017, 11:26:02 am »
Just saw that it's down to either the Gints or the Turdinals.

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #11 on: December 01, 2017, 11:37:27 am »
chemistry seems to play a part and you dont want to stir up the pot 
forever is composed entirely of nows

Knoxbanedoodle

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2542
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #12 on: December 01, 2017, 01:09:06 pm »
Why would he opt out of that contract?

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #13 on: December 05, 2017, 04:17:16 pm »
Some app told me today the Astros were in on Stanton but could not make a deal. Currently out.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

toddthebod

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3385
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #14 on: December 05, 2017, 09:51:56 pm »
From Twitter:

 Craig Mish‏Verified account @CraigMish
9h9 hours ago

Source : The Houston Astros at some point engaged the Marlins in discussions for Stanton. Unable to work it out. Not currently in the picture.
Boom!

Col. Sphinx Drummond

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16760
  • art is a bulwark against the irrationality of man
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #15 on: December 08, 2017, 07:46:38 am »
Yahoo Sports is reporting that Stanton will only accept a trade to the Cubs, Dodgers, Yankees, or Astros.
Everyone's talking, few of them know
The rest are pretending, they put on a show
And if there's a message I guess this is it
Truth isn't easy, the easy part's shit

das

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3465
    • View Profile
    • Faith Home Ministries
Re: Stanton
« Reply #16 on: December 08, 2017, 07:55:23 am »
Yahoo Sports is reporting that Stanton will only accept a trade to the Cubs, Dodgers, Yankees, or Astros.

This made me grin ear-to-ear.  Not because I am holding out hope that it will happen but because of what this says about the team transformation and how it is perceived throughout the player cadre.  Well done to the owner/front office.  And the City of Houston for embracing the team and making it an attractive destination.
Another trenchant comment by a jealous lesser intellect.

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #17 on: December 08, 2017, 08:20:02 am »
This made me grin ear-to-ear.  Not because I am holding out hope that it will happen but because of what this says about the team transformation and how it is perceived throughout the player cadre.  Well done to the owner/front office.  And the City of Houston for embracing the team and making it an attractive destination.
My initial thoughts exactly. But a bundle of decent prospects would sure be worth offering.
Up in the Air

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #18 on: December 08, 2017, 09:00:36 am »
My initial thoughts exactly. But a bundle of decent prospects would sure be worth offering.

If I'm Miami I'm asking for Whitley, Tucker, Bregman and Martes. Would you pull the trigger?

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #19 on: December 08, 2017, 09:07:26 am »
If I'm Miami I'm asking for Whitley, Tucker, Bregman and Martes. Would you pull the trigger?

Miami will take one tenth of that if we absorb the whole contract.

The deal with SF Stanton reportedly vetoes was for Joe Panik (league average 2b) and 2 non-top 100 prospects.

Our deal would be something like Fisher, Bukaskas, and Brady Rogers if that’s the case.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #20 on: December 08, 2017, 09:09:07 am »
If I'm Miami I'm asking for Whitley, Tucker, Bregman and Martes. Would you pull the trigger?

For this package, we would get Stanton, Ozuna, Realmuto, and Jeter’s first born son.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

toddthebod

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3385
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #21 on: December 08, 2017, 09:18:40 am »
Miami will take one tenth of that if we absorb the whole contract.

The deal with SF Stanton reportedly vetoes was for Joe Panik (league average 2b) and 2 non-top 100 prospects.

Our deal would be something like Fisher, Bukaskas, and Brady Rogers if that’s the case.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fisher, Paulino, Rogers gets it done. 
Boom!

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #22 on: December 08, 2017, 09:28:44 am »
Fisher, Paulino, Rogers gets it done.

And a whole lot of budget considerations. This may be a good deal initially but it will dry up $$ for Springer, Altuve, Keuchel. Maybe that is ok since I'm not confident of signing any of those long-term except Altuve.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #23 on: December 08, 2017, 09:55:41 am »
If I'm Miami I'm asking for Whitley, Tucker, Bregman and Martes. Would you pull the trigger?

Fuck no, and I doubt Miami thinks Houston would.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #24 on: December 08, 2017, 09:59:18 am »
And a whole lot of budget considerations. This may be a good deal initially but it will dry up $$ for Springer, Altuve, Keuchel. Maybe that is ok since I'm not confident of signing any of those long-term except Altuve.

I do not think this is necessarily the case. Crane is on board with Luhnow’s plan, he is on record as saying the Astros can afford Stanton’s contract, and Luhnow was in trade talks with Miami.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #25 on: December 08, 2017, 10:02:15 am »
Fisher, Paulino, Rogers gets it done.
Agree.  All three are on the cusp of major-league-ready, and any of them may turn out to be solid performers (if not stars).  They fill a lot of Miami holes while they try to rebuild the right way through the draft.  I'd probably be willing to throw in another AA/AAA prospect, though, as long as it is not Whitley or Tucker.  Somebody like Davis or Moran, for instance.

And just for the record, Bregman does not qualify as a "prospect" so I am not sure why his name came up as part of the bundle.
« Last Edit: December 08, 2017, 10:04:16 am by VirtualBob »
Up in the Air

toddthebod

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3385
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #26 on: December 08, 2017, 10:03:25 am »
And a whole lot of budget considerations. This may be a good deal initially but it will dry up $$ for Springer, Altuve, Keuchel. Maybe that is ok since I'm not confident of signing any of those long-term except Altuve.

I continue to believe that Stanton will opt out of the contract after 3 years.  He's going to break the single-season HR record in Houston.  And he will get an even bigger deal than what he is getting now, particularly after Harper and Machado set record contracts after next season. 

So yeah, the contract looks daunting now, but I think its a fairly short-term contract.

And Stanton, by the way is only 28.  This wouldn't be the Astros trading for a past-his-prime superstar. 
Boom!

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #27 on: December 08, 2017, 11:13:34 am »
I will not be shocked if we trade for him.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #28 on: December 08, 2017, 11:20:15 am »
I will not be shocked if we trade for him.

Me, too. If we do something really big I would prefer it be for that thing you can never have enough of. Pitching, of course.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #29 on: December 08, 2017, 12:29:01 pm »
Me, too. If we do something really big I would prefer it be for that thing you can never have enough of. Pitching, of course.

I will NOT be shocked....






Often wrong, but never in doubt.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #30 on: December 08, 2017, 01:08:56 pm »
I will not be shocked if we trade for him.

I think Crane wants it to happen. I'm scared shitless of the Yankees getting him and offloading Ellsbury's contract simultaneously.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #31 on: December 08, 2017, 01:18:34 pm »
I think Crane wants it to happen. I'm scared shitless of the Yankees getting him and offloading Ellsbury's contract simultaneously.

Stanton and Judge. It wouldn't surprise me.

Sambito Redux

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 271
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #32 on: December 08, 2017, 03:53:25 pm »
Sounds like the deal is $77 Million over three years and three prospects like Fisher, Paulino and Arauz with the risk being he does not opt out of his current contract we have to find a way to offload another approx $120 million as a plan B?
"Look at the size of that boy's head! It's like an orange on toothpick, a virtual planetoid.  Head move! 

Aye, that was offsides, he'll be crying himself to sleep tonight on his big pilla"

Scottish Father (So I Married An Axe Murderer)

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #33 on: December 08, 2017, 09:40:40 pm »
Of course, now the buzz is the Yankees will get him.

Where are you, Luhnow? No way they have better prospects. Do we want someone else instead?
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #34 on: December 08, 2017, 09:47:17 pm »
Of course, now the buzz is the Yankees will get him.

Where are you, Luhnow? No way they have better prospects. Do we want someone else instead?

I'm hopeful that Luhnow is working quietly behind the scenes as he did with Verlander, and we'll wake up one of these mornings and find out it's a done deal.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #35 on: December 08, 2017, 09:48:41 pm »
Per Jeff Passan:
Quote
Sources: Yankees making progress on a trade for Giancarlo Stanton. One source cautioned nothing done. Another was confident it’s moving toward that. Either way, momentum for Stanton to Yankees is significant.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Sambito Redux

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 271
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #36 on: December 08, 2017, 09:54:45 pm »
Not optimistic here. 

More Passan

Sources: The Yankees recognize they’re in a position of significant strength right now. Same with Giancarlo Stanton, who can decide exactly where he wants to go and force a deal. And the Marlins ... well, the Marlins are trying to figure out how to best salvage an absolute mess.
"Look at the size of that boy's head! It's like an orange on toothpick, a virtual planetoid.  Head move! 

Aye, that was offsides, he'll be crying himself to sleep tonight on his big pilla"

Scottish Father (So I Married An Axe Murderer)

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #37 on: December 09, 2017, 07:23:21 am »
Fuck. Stanton to Yankees says Heyman.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #38 on: December 09, 2017, 07:31:58 am »
Of course, now the buzz is the Yankees will get him.

Where are you, Luhnow? No way they have better prospects. Do we want someone else instead?

Their prospects are as good as the Astros.  This thing may be more about Stanton’s order of preference for team than anything else.
Goin' for a bus ride.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #39 on: December 09, 2017, 08:05:30 am »
Their prospects are as good as the Astros.  This thing may be more about Stanton’s order of preference for team than anything else.

Saw this morning that the Marlins ar demanding Starlin Castro plus a "higher level of prospects" from the Yankees. Don't know if this is old or legit.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #40 on: December 09, 2017, 08:18:16 am »
Saw this morning that the Marlins ar demanding Starlin Castro plus a "higher level of prospects" from the Yankees. Don't know if this is old or legit.

It's impossible to know what's going on from the outside.  Stanton seems to have boxed in the Marlins, the Marlins could be floating the Yankees to try to create a bidding war from everybody else. 

Starlin Castro?  I guess he did have a pretty good year last year.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #41 on: December 09, 2017, 08:34:53 am »
Saw this morning that the Marlins ar demanding Starlin Castro plus a "higher level of prospects" from the Yankees. Don't know if this is old or legit.

Regardless of what happens as an Astros fan for my 50 years of life having won the World Series Luhnow has a 10 year reprieve from me.
Goin' for a bus ride.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #42 on: December 09, 2017, 08:42:43 am »
It's impossible to know what's going on from the outside.  Stanton seems to have boxed in the Marlins, the Marlins could be floating the Yankees to try to create a bidding war from everybody else. 

Starlin Castro?  I guess he did have a pretty good year last year.

The implication was that the Marlins were willing to practically give Stanton to anyone but the Yankees. If the Yankees wanted him, they'd have to pony up a lot more. Again, don't know how true that is.

And Castro did have a pretty good year, hitting .300. And though it seems like he's been in the league forever, he's actually only two months older than Jose Altuve and has more career hits.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2017, 08:48:20 am by HudsonHawk »
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #43 on: December 09, 2017, 08:44:32 am »
Regardless of what happens as an Astros fan for my 50 years of life having won the World Series Luhnow has a 10 year reprieve from me.

Agreed. If the Yankees get Stanton, the Astros will just have to deal with facing him. He'd sure look good in Houston though.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Ty in Tampa

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 9111
  • You just gotta keep livin' man, L-I-V-I-N
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #44 on: December 09, 2017, 08:47:21 am »
FTY!
"You want me broken. You want me dead.
I'm living rent-free in the back of your head."

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #45 on: December 09, 2017, 09:14:17 am »
Their prospects are as good as the Astros.  This thing may be more about Stanton’s order of preference for team than anything else.

If you say so, you are the expert. Agree re the likelihood he ranked the teams.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Astros Fan in Big D

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 10331
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #46 on: December 09, 2017, 12:34:05 pm »
Well that sucks.

Now back to shoring up the bullpen.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Stanton
« Reply #47 on: December 10, 2017, 07:56:48 am »
This had everything to do with the $295m left on the contract and almost nothing to do with what prospects a team was willing to send back. Castro was in the deal to offset salary. Note that Stanton wanted to go to LA, and the Dodgers could have easily afforded him, but chose not to.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

doyce7

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3106
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #48 on: December 10, 2017, 09:46:26 am »
This had everything to do with the $295m left on the contract and almost nothing to do with what prospects a team was willing to send back. Castro was in the deal to offset salary. Note that Stanton wanted to go to LA, and the Dodgers could have easily afforded him, but chose not to.
The Dodgers didn't want to take a massive luxury tax hit and would have wanted the Marlins to take one of the plethora of bad contracts

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk


JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #49 on: December 10, 2017, 10:08:57 am »
The Dodgers didn't want to take a massive luxury tax hit and would have wanted the Marlins to take one of the plethora of bad contracts

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

This is correct. It also is correct Crane said the Astros could take on his contract.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Stanton
« Reply #50 on: December 10, 2017, 10:22:48 am »
This is correct. It also is correct Crane said the Astros could take on his contract.
And I think he probably meant it. But Luhnow probably convinced him it wouldn’t be a good idea. Hopefully, that’s because they’re earmarking that kind of cash for extensions for Correa, Altuve, etc.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #51 on: December 10, 2017, 10:26:42 am »
Last year at this time Luhnow had completed his Christmas shopping. McCann, Reddick, Morton and Beltran all signed or dealt for.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #52 on: December 10, 2017, 11:00:31 am »
And I think he probably meant it. But Luhnow probably convinced him it wouldn’t be a good idea. Hopefully, that’s because they’re earmarking that kind of cash for extensions for Correa, Altuve, etc.

I seriously doubt the GM tells the owner how to spend his money.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Stanton
« Reply #53 on: December 10, 2017, 12:10:22 pm »
I seriously doubt the GM tells the owner how to spend his money.
Some owners ignore their GMs on the mega-deal players, but isn’t it basically the GM’s job to decide how to spend the owner’s money? I trust Luhnow much more than Crane to decide which players are worth committing $30m a year to.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

Astros Fan in Big D

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 10331
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #54 on: December 10, 2017, 03:40:56 pm »
Not sure how the attrition process worked once they were down to the final 4, i.e. did the Astros bow out or get a chance to counter offer?

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #55 on: December 11, 2017, 04:25:03 am »
I can't help but be bothered by Jeter's involvement. He's a Yankee legend.  The Yankees took on a lot of contingent salary if Stanton doesn't opt out of his deal in 2020. But I wasn't impressed with the talent that Miami received in exchange. I wonder what Bowie Kuhn would have done with this deal. Oh well. Time to move on.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #56 on: December 11, 2017, 09:19:04 am »
I can't help but be bothered by Jeter's involvement. He's a Yankee legend.  The Yankees took on a lot of contingent salary if Stanton doesn't opt out of his deal in 2020. But I wasn't impressed with the talent that Miami received in exchange. I wonder what Bowie Kuhn would have done with this deal. Oh well. Time to move on.

Bowie Kuhn also entered my mind about this deal. Truly a different era today. A lot of more complicated.

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #57 on: December 11, 2017, 09:28:48 am »
Meanwhile, Keuchel has hired Boras for representation as per the Chronicle.

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #58 on: December 11, 2017, 09:47:50 am »
I'd have put the chances of signing Keuchel at the end of the year at about 2%, before he hired Boras.
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #59 on: December 11, 2017, 09:54:35 am »
I'd have put the chances of signing Keuchel at the end of the year at about 2%, before he hired Boras.

Based on comments he's made in the past regarding team moves and/or the lack thereof I have been expecting him to be in NY, Boston, Chicago, or LA for the 19 season.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Stanton
« Reply #60 on: December 11, 2017, 10:19:08 am »
Based on comments he's made in the past regarding team moves and/or the lack thereof I have been expecting him to be in NY, Boston, Chicago, or LA for the 19 season.
Signing him would be one way for the Yankees to avoid being dominated by him in crucial games.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #61 on: December 11, 2017, 03:39:33 pm »
Based on comments he's made in the past regarding team moves and/or the lack thereof I have been expecting him to be in NY, Boston, Chicago, or LA for the 19 season.

If they are pretty certain they will lose him to FA, trading him now might be tempting, especially if they sign Arrieta and/or Darvish.
« Last Edit: December 11, 2017, 04:03:13 pm by JimR »
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #62 on: December 11, 2017, 03:56:50 pm »
If they are pretty certain they will lose him to FA, trading him now might be tempting, especially if the sign Arrieta and/or Darvish.

I thought about the Astros dealing him this winter back at the beginning of the season as well.  They'd certainly have to have another veteran at that level if they do.  I don't know that Arrieta or Darvish are though.  What would be intriguing is dealing him and using the prospects gained in a deal for a guy like Archer or Stroman.
Goin' for a bus ride.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #63 on: December 11, 2017, 04:00:48 pm »
I thought about the Astros dealing him this winter back at the beginning of the season as well.  They'd certainly have to have another veteran at that level if they do.  I don't know that Arrieta or Darvish are though.  What would be intriguing is dealing him and using the prospects gained in a deal for a guy like Archer or Stroman.

Sign Arrieta, and do the deals you propose.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #64 on: December 11, 2017, 04:21:04 pm »
Arrieta - ERA - WHIP - IP
2015 - 1.77 - 0.865 - 229
2016 - 3.10 - 1.084 - 197
2017 - 3.55 - 1.218 - 168

He turns 32 to start the season, wants 4+ years $100+ million.   Doesn't really seem like the kind of guy Luhnow would go after.
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

toddthebod

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3385
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #65 on: December 11, 2017, 04:22:02 pm »
So amused.  Jim proposing that the Astros trade Keuchel for prospects, turn those prospects over for Archer or Stroman and also sign Arrieta is toddthebod vintage 2002.
Boom!

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #66 on: December 11, 2017, 04:29:22 pm »
So amused.  Jim proposing that the Astros trade Keuchel for prospects, turn those prospects over for Archer or Stroman and also sign Arrieta is toddthebod vintage 2002.

Jacksonian proposed the Kuechel trade actually. I just said it is tempting.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #67 on: December 11, 2017, 06:37:40 pm »
Jacksonian proposed the Kuechel trade actually. I just said it is tempting.

I did.  But trading to stock pile prospects to then deal for something else is the kind of thinking I’d expect from Luhnow.
Goin' for a bus ride.

geezerdonk

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3342
  • a long tradition of existence
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #68 on: December 11, 2017, 06:42:58 pm »
If Kuechel leaves for free agency, does Houston get draft pick compensation?
E come vivo? Vivo.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Stanton
« Reply #69 on: December 11, 2017, 06:51:50 pm »
If Kuechel leaves for free agency, does Houston get draft pick compensation?
Keuchel. And yes, they would, assuming they make him a qualifying offer after the season. It would probably be a comp pick after the 1st round.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #70 on: December 11, 2017, 08:49:27 pm »
Keuchel. And yes, they would, assuming they make him a qualifying offer after the season. It would probably be a comp pick after the 1st round.

I started the misspelling. Mea culpa.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #71 on: December 11, 2017, 11:16:17 pm »
I started the misspelling. Mea culpa.
light a cnadle when you say that ...
Up in the Air

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Stanton
« Reply #72 on: December 11, 2017, 11:44:30 pm »
I started the misspelling. Mea culpa.
I’m particularly sensitive to that -eu versus -ue distinction.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

Ebby Calvin

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3595
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #73 on: December 12, 2017, 07:56:01 am »
Marwin signed with Boras.
Don't think twice, it's alright.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #74 on: December 12, 2017, 09:20:58 am »
Marwin signed with Boras.

Freaking conspiracy
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #75 on: December 12, 2017, 09:44:35 am »
Freaking conspiracy

Win a world series = show me the money
Goin' for a bus ride.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #76 on: December 12, 2017, 09:56:32 am »
Win a world series = show me the money

and forget which organization saw something in you when others did not
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Stanton
« Reply #77 on: December 12, 2017, 01:28:56 pm »
Freaking conspiracy
Beltran’s veteran guidance may have had unintended consequences.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

Col. Sphinx Drummond

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16760
  • art is a bulwark against the irrationality of man
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #78 on: December 12, 2017, 05:10:57 pm »
As an Astros fan it's a bummer because he's such a demanding negotiator but I'm sure Marwin chose Boras because he is a great agent from a player's perspective.
Everyone's talking, few of them know
The rest are pretending, they put on a show
And if there's a message I guess this is it
Truth isn't easy, the easy part's shit

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #79 on: December 12, 2017, 05:22:20 pm »
As an Astros fan it's a bummer because he's such a demanding negotiator but I'm sure Marwin chose Boras because he is a great agent from a player's perspective.
Do his clients' ever re-sign with the original club? That's a serious question....I don't know. Why would someone hire Boras and then out of the other side of their mouth say they really like Houston and would like to work something out? Trying to make themselves (the player) look like they aren't the bad guy?

On another note....there are a couple of McTaggert tweets I've seen elsewhere with Luhnow saying something could happen tonight. Seems to be for pitching and I'm assuming it is a deal rather than a signing.
« Last Edit: December 12, 2017, 05:24:40 pm by juliogotay »

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #80 on: December 12, 2017, 05:29:01 pm »
i thought I'd posted this earlier, but apparently I failed, or I posted it elsewhere.  Altuve is also a Boras' client. 

ETA:  Now I see it, in the Free Agents thread.  Never mind. 
« Last Edit: December 12, 2017, 05:33:01 pm by NeilT »
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #81 on: December 12, 2017, 07:57:31 pm »
A rare sighting of the elusive self-Cabrera in its natural habitat.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #82 on: December 12, 2017, 09:07:05 pm »
As an Astros fan it's a bummer because he's such a demanding negotiator but I'm sure Marwin chose Boras because he is a great agent from a player's perspective.

Fuck that. Marwin should ask him “where were you when I was nobody?”
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Col. Sphinx Drummond

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16760
  • art is a bulwark against the irrationality of man
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #83 on: December 12, 2017, 09:46:47 pm »
Fuck that. Marwin should ask him “where were you when I was nobody?”
Yeah! fuck that. Boras' client list is probably filled with guys who were at one time relative nobodies.
Everyone's talking, few of them know
The rest are pretending, they put on a show
And if there's a message I guess this is it
Truth isn't easy, the easy part's shit

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #84 on: December 12, 2017, 11:34:55 pm »
Yeah! fuck that. Boras' client list is probably filled with guys who were at one time relative nobodies.

All about Boras and his %. He is a predator.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #85 on: December 13, 2017, 01:46:58 am »
Fuck that. Marwin should ask him “where were you when I was nobody?”

Are you insane?
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Astros Fan in Big D

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 10331
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #86 on: December 13, 2017, 07:18:58 am »
All about Boras and his %. He is a predator.

One radio guy here refers to Boras as The Baseball Antichrist.


Waldo

  • Administrator
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6506
    • View Profile
    • http://www.ashrubbery.com/
Re: Stanton
« Reply #87 on: December 13, 2017, 07:39:42 am »
One radio guy here Baseball fans everywhere refers to Boras as The Baseball Antichrist.

FIFY

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #88 on: December 13, 2017, 09:13:35 am »
One radio guy here refers to Boras as The Baseball Antichrist.

Rhyner. One of his better references.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #89 on: December 13, 2017, 09:15:08 am »
A rare sighting of the elusive self-Cabrera in its natural habitat.

I have a cold.  Being male, that means I'm near death.  I only function if I'm drinking hot toddies.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #90 on: December 13, 2017, 09:35:54 am »
Are you insane?

Maybe, but I do not think so. You should ask the folks who spend time with me.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #91 on: December 13, 2017, 10:28:19 am »
Maybe, but I do not think so. You should ask the folks who spend time with me.

We would, but we can't see them.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #92 on: December 13, 2017, 10:39:12 am »
they are imaginary?
forever is composed entirely of nows

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #93 on: December 13, 2017, 11:11:01 am »
Luhnow has said the club is not looking for bottom of the rotation starting pitchers. Implied that they are looking to bolster the top of the rotation. The Pirates apparently are making Cole available. Maybe something to keep an eye on.

toddthebod

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3385
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #94 on: December 13, 2017, 11:38:35 am »
The Astros actually have a top rotation right now with Verlander, Keuchel, McCullers, Morton, McHugh.  If they are thinking about a top of rotation starter, it would seem to be a move geared as much towards next year when they lose Keuchel and Morton as it is for this year.  But if they are looking at Arrieta or Darvish who will cost a ton, why not just resign Keuchel with that money?

The list of available quality relievers is shrinking very quickly, particularly if it is true that Holland is going back to the Rockies.  The rumors that the Astros are thinking about resigning Liriano trouble me.           
Boom!

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #95 on: December 13, 2017, 11:42:48 am »
The Astros actually have a top rotation right now with Verlander, Keuchel, McCullers, Morton, McHugh.  If they are thinking about a top of rotation starter, it would seem to be a move geared as much towards next year when they lose Keuchel and Morton as it is for this year.  But if they are looking at Arrieta or Darvish who will cost a ton, why not just resign Keuchel with that money?

The list of available quality relievers is shrinking very quickly, particularly if it is true that Holland is going back to the Rockies.  The rumors that the Astros are thinking about resigning Liriano trouble me.         

BECAUSE KEUCHEL IS GOING FA!

Liriano is a good #2 lefty. He was very effective down the stretch and in his two WS appearances..

Often wrong, but never in doubt.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #96 on: December 13, 2017, 11:51:05 am »
We would, but we can't see them.

My nephew had an imaginary friend named Tutu. Whenever it came time to make teams for whatever game they were going to play it was always my nephew and his dad versus my mom and Tutu. Turns out Tutu is a shit soccer player.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

gundy315

  • Disappointing Rookie
  • Posts: 92
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #97 on: December 13, 2017, 11:52:00 am »
The Astros actually have a top rotation right now with Verlander, Keuchel, McCullers, Morton, McHugh.  If they are thinking about a top of rotation starter, it would seem to be a move geared as much towards next year when they lose Keuchel and Morton as it is for this year.  But if they are looking at Arrieta or Darvish who will cost a ton, why not just resign Keuchel with that money?

The list of available quality relievers is shrinking very quickly, particularly if it is true that Holland is going back to the Rockies.  The rumors that the Astros are thinking about resigning Liriano trouble me.         

You can never have enough quality arms, and four of those five spent time on the DL last year.   Liriano's stuff was/is still pretty damn nasty, and his results did improve after getting knocked around for his first couple of weeks with the club.

Inside info: Arrieta told a friend of mine (not a baseball guy, and with no skin in the game) that he really wants to come to Houston.  My response was, "well, yeah... but at what price?"  My friend's reply: "I dunno, man... he seemed pretty emphatic."

ETA: Arrieta lives in Austin.  Whether his property qualifies as a "Ranch" is unclear.
« Last Edit: December 13, 2017, 12:01:16 pm by gundy315 »

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #98 on: December 13, 2017, 12:05:54 pm »
BECAUSE KEUCHEL IS GOING FA!

Liriano is a good #2 lefty. He was very effective down the stretch and in his two WS appearances..

Totally agree regarding Liriano.

doyce7

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3106
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #99 on: December 13, 2017, 12:12:51 pm »
BECAUSE KEUCHEL IS GOING FA!

Liriano is a good #2 lefty. He was very effective down the stretch and in his two WS appearances..
I think with a full spring training dedicated to being a reliever, liriano can be a top level lefty reliever. I would love the Astros to resign him

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk


NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #100 on: December 13, 2017, 12:34:55 pm »
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #101 on: December 13, 2017, 01:05:20 pm »
BECAUSE KEUCHEL IS GOING FA!

Liriano is a good #2 lefty. He was very effective down the stretch and in his two WS appearances..

+1 Liriano has what most lefty specialists don't have: filthy stuff when he's right. I remember watching him pitch when he first came up with the Twins. He had a Bugs Bunny slider that still to this day one of the top three sliders I've ever seen, one of the others being pre-TJ Kerry Wood.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #102 on: December 13, 2017, 01:10:09 pm »
You can never have enough quality arms, and four of those five spent time on the DL last year.   Liriano's stuff was/is still pretty damn nasty, and his results did improve after getting knocked around for his first couple of weeks with the club.

Inside info: Arrieta told a friend of mine (not a baseball guy, and with no skin in the game) that he really wants to come to Houston.  My response was, "well, yeah... but at what price?"  My friend's reply: "I dunno, man... he seemed pretty emphatic."

ETA: Arrieta lives in Austin.  Whether his property qualifies as a "Ranch" is unclear.

Arrieta needs to tell his “all my clients should get $200 Million” agent where he wants to go and remind him who the boss is in a principal-agent relationship.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

gundy315

  • Disappointing Rookie
  • Posts: 92
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #103 on: December 13, 2017, 01:29:56 pm »
Arrieta needs to tell his “all my clients should get $200 Million” agent where he wants to go and remind him who the boss is in a principal-agent relationship.

I agree.  Hence, my skepticism.  I take his comments to my friend to really mean, "I hope the Astros are the highest bidder."

geezerdonk

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3342
  • a long tradition of existence
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #104 on: December 13, 2017, 01:36:43 pm »
If the price is right, I wouldn't mind the Astros signing Arrieta or Cole or Darvish. Then they could trade Kuechel for a reliever or two. If he is so anxious to leave, maybe they can do him a favor and get him out the door a year earlier.

Are the Astros actively courting Liriano? Who are the other teams interested in him?
E come vivo? Vivo.

das

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3465
    • View Profile
    • Faith Home Ministries
Re: Stanton
« Reply #105 on: December 13, 2017, 01:42:51 pm »
If the price is right, I wouldn't mind the Astros signing Arrieta or Cole or Darvish. Then they could trade Kuechel for a reliever or two. If he is so anxious to leave, maybe they can do him a favor and get him out the door a year earlier.

I’ve not seen a single indication that Keuchel is anxious to leave.  What’s the basis of this comment?
Another trenchant comment by a jealous lesser intellect.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #106 on: December 13, 2017, 01:51:55 pm »
I’ve not seen a single indication that Keuchel is anxious to leave.  What’s the basis of this comment?

He yelled at the front office for not making a trade by the trade deadline.  He's a malcontent. 
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #107 on: December 13, 2017, 01:59:31 pm »
He yelled at the front office for not making a trade by the trade deadline.  He's a malcontent.

And he hired Boras which means he has ceded all control over his future. 
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #108 on: December 13, 2017, 02:05:01 pm »
I agree.  Hence, my skepticism.  I take his comments to my friend to really mean, "I hope the Astros are the highest bidder."

Which they will not be
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

gundy315

  • Disappointing Rookie
  • Posts: 92
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #109 on: December 13, 2017, 02:11:15 pm »
He yelled at the front office for not making a trade by the trade deadline.  He's a malcontent.

July 31st:
Quote
"I'd be lying if I didn't say I was disappointed in not getting some of the moves done that we were working on," Luhnow said after the 3 p.m. deadline passed.

"We had some that were close to and almost over the finish line, and at times I would've put them at 90 percent-plus that we were going to get them done. But there are a lot of dynamics that happen with these deals, and for reasons I can't really talk about, they didn't happen."

The next day:
Quote
"I mean, I'm not going to lie, disappointment is a little bit of an understatement," Keuchel said Tuesday, a day after the trade deadline. "I feel like a bunch of teams really bolstered their rosters for the long haul and for a huge playoff push, and us just kind of staying pat was really disappointing to myself."


Malcontent, or just echoing organization-wide sentiment?

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #110 on: December 13, 2017, 02:14:08 pm »
I’ve not seen a single indication that Keuchel is anxious to leave.  What’s the basis of this comment?

Maybe it isn't Keuchel that is anxious to see him move on...
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #111 on: December 13, 2017, 02:24:00 pm »
Maybe it isn't Keuchel that is anxious to see him move on...

That thought crossed my mind also. A trade would not surprise me.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #112 on: December 13, 2017, 02:41:05 pm »
July 31st:

The next day:

Malcontent, or just echoing organization-wide sentiment?

don't take Neil for verbatim. His wit lends towards sarcastic.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #113 on: December 13, 2017, 02:46:10 pm »
don't take Neil for verbatim. His wit lends towards sarcastic.

Yeah.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #114 on: December 13, 2017, 02:49:00 pm »
That thought crossed my mind also. A trade would not surprise me.

 Ultimately think it would be a big loss. When he's healthy and keeping the ball down he is money. Fields his position very well and extremely competitive. Not to mention a rare LHer in this organization. I would think he will age well as his game doesn't depend on velocity but location.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #115 on: December 13, 2017, 02:58:00 pm »
Ultimately think it would be a big loss. When he's healthy and keeping the ball down he is money. Fields his position very well and extremely competitive. Not to mention a rare LHer in this organization. I would think he will age well as his game doesn't depend on velocity but location.

I would miss seeing Keuchel play defense every 5th day. 
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #116 on: December 13, 2017, 03:03:54 pm »
Ultimately think it would be a big loss. When he's healthy and keeping the ball down he is money. Fields his position very well and extremely competitive. Not to mention a rare LHer in this organization. I would think he will age well as his game doesn't depend on velocity but location.

I do not doubt any of this, but I do not think his attitude is very good.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #117 on: December 13, 2017, 03:56:59 pm »
I do not doubt any of this, but I do not think his attitude is very good.
OK. I get that but  unless  there is a lot more that I am not aware of and not made public I will hope that he and his attitude hang around for one more contract. He seemed as crazy happy as anyone on the club when they won the pennant and the WS and helped convince Verlander to accept the deal. "You'll love it here" doesn't sound the words of a malcontent.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #118 on: December 13, 2017, 04:14:53 pm »
OK. I get that but  unless  there is a lot more that I am not aware of and not made public I will hope that he and his attitude hang around for one more contract. He seemed as crazy happy as anyone on the club when they won the pennant and the WS and helped convince Verlander to accept the deal. "You'll love it here" doesn't sound the words of a malcontent.

I have no sources on this. My opinion only.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

mrpink

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 915
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #119 on: December 13, 2017, 04:47:10 pm »
Keuchel's response to the situation on twitter.  Apologies if Cabrera'd.

https://twitter.com/kidkeuchy/status/940381372241326080

das

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3465
    • View Profile
    • Faith Home Ministries
Re: Stanton
« Reply #120 on: December 14, 2017, 05:59:59 am »
Keuchel's response to the situation on twitter.  Apologies if Cabrera'd.
https://twitter.com/kidkeuchy/status/940381372241326080

Looks like public/media negotiations have started early. I wonder if Boras helped him craft that tweet. Not a mention of the Astros, who scouted him, drafted him, developed him and paid him $17.5M over the last 4 years. Only mentions city/fans. Bleh.
Another trenchant comment by a jealous lesser intellect.

roadrunner

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2164
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #121 on: December 14, 2017, 09:36:00 am »
I don't think DK has a bad attitude.  He did speak openly about the lack of a deadline deal pre-Verlander, but other than that he has basically just worked hard and pitched well. 

I don't know why anyone faults these guys for hiring Boras.  As fans, yes we hate him, but if you are a player why wouldn't you try to get the most money out of teams?  It's not like the Astros gave Keuchel more than he deserved in his arbitration years.  Look at what they gave Correa last year. 

Baseball is a business...(no shit).

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #122 on: December 14, 2017, 09:46:15 am »
I don't think DK has a bad attitude.  He did speak openly about the lack of a deadline deal pre-Verlander, but other than that he has basically just worked hard and pitched well. 

I don't know why anyone faults these guys for hiring Boras.  As fans, yes we hate him, but if you are a player why wouldn't you try to get the most money out of teams?  It's not like the Astros gave Keuchel more than he deserved in his arbitration years.  Look at what they gave Correa last year. 

Baseball is a business...(no shit).

It's interesting that these "loyalty" discounts that everyone always talks about for free agents only goes one way. 
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

AtascAstro

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1092
  • 92 in 2011!
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #123 on: December 14, 2017, 10:22:02 am »
They gave us a beautiful, perfect season.  There is no unfinished business in Houston.  If they've always wanted to play in another city or some other team values their services more than that Astros, God speed and thanks for the memory.

Keuchel and Altuve endured the bad years and as such would be the most deserving of gratitude in the form of over-payment from the club.  Between the two, I'd most like to be the highest bidder for Altuve.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Stanton
« Reply #124 on: December 14, 2017, 10:30:03 am »
They gave us a beautiful, perfect season.  There is no unfinished business in Houston.  If they've always wanted to play in another city or some other team values their services more than that Astros, God speed and thanks for the memory.

Keuchel and Altuve endured the bad years and as such would be the most deserving of gratitude in the form of over-payment from the club.  Between the two, I'd most like to be the highest bidder for Altuve.

My guess is—again with no source or info—they let Keuchel walk with no regrets and break the bank for Altuve.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #125 on: December 14, 2017, 10:33:54 am »
My guess is—again with no source or info—they let Keuchel walk with no regrets and break the bank for Altuve.

I suspect so. They are reportedly looking for TORP help. While Keuchel seems intent on moving on it may be the club isn't that anxious to give him TORP $$ based on current market and what the braintrust have projected for his future performance/durability.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #126 on: December 14, 2017, 10:34:09 am »
There is certainly value in loyalty, as there is in braveness, cleanliness, and reverence.  That said, between the organization and the player, there's no reason we shouldn't expect loyalty to run both ways. 
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

Astros Fan in Big D

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 10331
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #127 on: December 14, 2017, 10:42:07 am »
My guess is—again with no source or info—they let Keuchel walk with no regrets and break the bank for Altuve.

If I had to choose between the 2,  that would be my preference.

And all discussion of this underscores the real challenge for Lunhow: building a franchise that sustains excellence. And that almost never entails keeping every player who makes a positive contribution.

mrpink

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 915
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #128 on: December 14, 2017, 10:46:45 am »
If they've always wanted to play in another city or some other team values their services more than that Astros, God speed and thanks for the memory.

He's from Tulsa, right?  If being close to home counts for something I can't imagine there's a team that he would want to play for more than the Ast......oh shit.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #129 on: December 14, 2017, 10:51:18 am »
He's from Tulsa, right?  If being close to home counts for something I can't imagine there's a team that he would want to play for more than the Ast......oh shit.

St. Louis may be closer than Dallas, or Kansas City.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

mrpink

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 915
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #130 on: December 14, 2017, 10:54:33 am »
St. Louis may be closer than Dallas, or Kansas City.

You may be right.  I never gave much thought to the part of the world north of the Red River.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #131 on: December 14, 2017, 10:55:01 am »
You may be right.  I never gave much thought to the part of the world north of the Red River.

Yankees.  All of 'em.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #132 on: December 14, 2017, 12:41:09 pm »
i used to cross the red river going from natchitoches all the time. i had no idea such evil lurked above
forever is composed entirely of nows

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #133 on: December 14, 2017, 01:03:33 pm »
He's from Tulsa, right?  If being close to home counts for something I can't imagine there's a team that he would want to play for more than the Ast......oh shit.

I doubt that Keuchel needs to be particularly close to Tulsa.

Col. Sphinx Drummond

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16760
  • art is a bulwark against the irrationality of man
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #134 on: December 14, 2017, 01:24:09 pm »
I doubt that Keuchel needs to be particularly close to Tulsa.
Nobody needs to be particularly close to Tulsa. There's the Philbrook, the Gilcrease, and Cain's Ballroom. That's it. A Saturday's worth of stuff to do there. Nothing else.
Everyone's talking, few of them know
The rest are pretending, they put on a show
And if there's a message I guess this is it
Truth isn't easy, the easy part's shit

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #135 on: December 14, 2017, 01:35:49 pm »
Nobody needs to be particularly close to Tulsa.
This.
Up in the Air

Duke

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1247
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #136 on: December 15, 2017, 07:33:34 am »
I think Kershaw is a FA after next year too.  Jus' sayin'.

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Stanton
« Reply #137 on: December 15, 2017, 08:59:21 am »
I think Kershaw is a FA after next year too.  Jus' sayin'.

Too bad the Dodgers don't have any money to spend.