Author Topic: Cubs at Mets  (Read 3345 times)

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Cubs at Mets
« on: October 17, 2015, 09:26:26 pm »
Mets leading 4-1 now after the Cubs catcher is WAY out of position on a play at the plate.  If you're watching boys and girls...that is exactly where you DON"T want to be to field a throw.   
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2015, 09:36:12 pm »
Kyle Schwarber hits the shit out of a baseball.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2015, 09:49:54 pm »
Mets leading 4-1 now after the Cubs catcher is WAY out of position on a play at the plate.  If you're watching boys and girls...that is exactly where you DON"T want to be to field a throw.

What was he thinking?
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2015, 10:36:36 pm »
What was he thinking?

I'm guessing he just backed up to get a big hop on the throw.  Talking heads afterward blamed the rule about blocking the plate, but he could have still been in front of it, and if the throw carries him in the baseline, it's not a violation.  Either way, he 1) put the runner between him and the ball and 2) put the plate between him and the runner.  Both are no-nos. 

Little, fundamental things are so important in the postseason.  Leaving a base uncovered...being in bad position to field a throw...every mistake just gets magnified. 
« Last Edit: October 17, 2015, 10:38:36 pm by HudsonHawk »
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2015, 08:59:35 pm »
Mets just got absolutely, royally fucked on the ground rules for the ivy. Runner was already home when the ball went in.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

WVastro

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2111
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2015, 09:06:08 pm »
Mets just got absolutely, royally fucked on the ground rules for the ivy. Runner was already home when the ball went in.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Shitty for the Mets. Although it was the correct call it just ignores common sense.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #6 on: October 20, 2015, 09:14:05 pm »
@Cubs: Thank you all for your groundskeeping advice.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

homer

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6509
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #7 on: October 20, 2015, 10:25:07 pm »
FTC
Oye. Vamos, vamos.

Col. Sphinx Drummond

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16760
  • art is a bulwark against the irrationality of man
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #8 on: October 22, 2015, 05:38:01 am »
Wow! Terry Collins has managed a team all the way to the World Series. Good for him, I guess.
Everyone's talking, few of them know
The rest are pretending, they put on a show
And if there's a message I guess this is it
Truth isn't easy, the easy part's shit

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #9 on: October 22, 2015, 07:10:25 am »
Wow! Terry Collins has managed a team all the way to the World Series. Good for him, I guess.

Yeah, I'm one of the people that predicted he would flame out in spectacular fashion in the tough NY environment. Wrong again.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #10 on: October 22, 2015, 07:41:01 am »
FTC
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #11 on: October 22, 2015, 08:04:48 am »
Not even aa hip manager like Joe Maddon can win with the FTC. Bwahahahaha!
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

Dark Star

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 483
  • Stella Obscura
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #12 on: October 22, 2015, 08:25:17 am »
Yeah, I'm one of the people that predicted he would flame out in spectacular fashion in the tough NY environment. Wrong again.

I am happy for him.

When he was here (has it really been twenty years ago?), he struck me as a wound-too-tight over manager, and kind of a prick, as well. A friend who played for him in California/Anaheim more-or-less confirmed the assessment. But from what I have read and heard, Collins kept learning as he went along, even changed up his style somewhat. He was kind of a surprise hire  when the Mets originally brought him on board, as I recall; but he apparently works well with the younger players, and it is hard to argue with the results.

Plus, his team dick-stomped the Cubs. That gets him extra points, in my book.
Shall we go, you and I, while we can,
Through the transitive nightfall of diamonds?

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #13 on: October 22, 2015, 09:08:43 am »
I am happy for him.

When he was here (has it really been twenty years ago?), he struck me as a wound-too-tight over manager, and kind of a prick, as well. A friend who played for him in California/Anaheim more-or-less confirmed the assessment. But from what I have read and heard, Collins kept learning as he went along, even changed up his style somewhat. He was kind of a surprise hire  when the Mets originally brought him on board, as I recall; but he apparently works well with the younger players, and it is hard to argue with the results.

It seems he's completely reinvented his managing style over the decades.  I'm always surprised when I see so many stories about how warm and encouraging he is with the young players, and lets the veterans like David Wright lead on their own terms.  A complete 180 from his uptight, general blown gasket attitude when he was here.  Growth is a good a thing.

Plus, his team dick-stomped the Cubs. That gets him extra points, in my book.

My favorite aspect of that series is that the Cubs don't have one calamitous "unlucky/cursed" event to blame everything on.  They simply got soundly and decisively beat.  They were barely in any game.  Shut up and go home, Cub fans. 
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #14 on: October 22, 2015, 09:32:16 am »
And here's an interesting tidbit from Grantland's wrap-up of yesterday's action:

The 8-3 victory ensures that, for the first time in history, the World Series will not involve one of Major League Baseball’s original 16 teams.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #15 on: October 22, 2015, 09:51:11 am »
And here's an interesting tidbit from Grantland's wrap-up of yesterday's action:

The 8-3 victory ensures that, for the first time in history, the World Series will not involve one of Major League Baseball’s original 16 teams.

Hard to imagine it took so long for that to occur.

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #16 on: October 22, 2015, 09:54:35 am »
It seems he's completely reinvented his managing style over the decades.  I'm always surprised when I see so many stories about how warm and encouraging he is with the young players, and lets the veterans like David Wright lead on their own terms.  A complete 180 from his uptight, general blown gasket attitude when he was here.  Growth is a good a thing.

My favorite aspect of that series is that the Cubs don't have one calamitous "unlucky/cursed" event to blame everything on.  They simply got soundly and decisively beat.  They were barely in any game.  Shut up and go home, Cub fans.

That Mets' staff is scary good. Every starter I saw throws 96 or so. I can't help but believe that Houston could put a staff together like that with VV, Feliz, McCullers and Appel around Keuchel of course. Doesn't mean they would be good, just hard throwers.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #17 on: October 22, 2015, 09:56:54 am »
I never thought I would see anyone as hot as Beltran in the playoffs as an Astro. Murphy was a "who's he?" guy for me, but not any longer.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Mike S.

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 288
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #18 on: October 22, 2015, 11:03:47 am »
Because of 1986, I despise the mets with the energy of a 1000 white hot suns.  Reckon that puts me in the minority against the FTC sentiment.
Chevy! Chevy! Astro! Astro!

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #19 on: October 22, 2015, 11:09:02 am »
Because of 1986, I despise the mets with the energy of a 1000 white hot suns.  Reckon that puts me in the minority against the FTC sentiment.
because of 1969 I kinda like 'em.

I used to like the Cubs, too ... Santo, Banks, Brock, Buhl, Ellsworth.  No more.
Up in the Air

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #20 on: October 22, 2015, 11:11:50 am »
Because of 1986, I despise the mets with the energy of a 1000 white hot suns.  Reckon that puts me in the minority against the FTC sentiment.

Root for the Royals:
  • They're from our league;
  • They're not a divisional rival;
  • They're not annoying (except for Cueto);
  • They're not Canadian; and
  • They're not the Mets.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Duke

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1247
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #21 on: October 22, 2015, 11:27:25 am »
I never thought I would see anyone as hot as Beltran in the playoffs as an Astro. Murphy was a "who's he?" guy for me, but not any longer.

Hot as he was they just kept pitching to him and he kept hittin 'em out.  Amazing run.

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #22 on: October 22, 2015, 11:29:35 am »
somehow appropriate it was on back to the future day
forever is composed entirely of nows

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #23 on: October 22, 2015, 12:12:43 pm »
Because of 1986, I despise the mets with the energy of a 1000 white hot suns.  Reckon that puts me in the minority against the FTC sentiment.


I do too but not worse than the Cubs.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Craig

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3289
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #24 on: October 22, 2015, 12:12:53 pm »
Because of 1986, I despise the mets with the energy of a 1000 white hot suns.  Reckon that puts me in the minority against the FTC sentiment.

Hating the goddamn Mets and the stupid fucking Cubs doesn't have to be mutually exclusive. You can hold both positions at the same time. Well, I can anyway.

Dark Star

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 483
  • Stella Obscura
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #25 on: October 22, 2015, 12:12:58 pm »
because of 1969 I kinda like 'em.

I used to like the Cubs, too ... Santo, Banks, Brock, Buhl, Ellsworth.  No more.

Kessinger and Beckert up the middle. Billy Williams. Fergie Jenkins.

A lot easier to like back then; until Durocher got there, I guess.
Shall we go, you and I, while we can,
Through the transitive nightfall of diamonds?

das

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3465
    • View Profile
    • Faith Home Ministries
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #26 on: October 22, 2015, 01:14:53 pm »
Root for the Royals:
  • They're from our league;
  • They're not a divisional rival;
  • They're not annoying (except for Cueto);
  • They're not Canadian; and
  • They're not the Mets.

For the first time in the history of forever, I will be rooting for an AL team in the WS.
Another trenchant comment by a jealous lesser intellect.

Mike S.

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 288
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #27 on: October 22, 2015, 02:15:30 pm »
Root for the Royals:
  • They're from our league;
  • They're not a divisional rival;
  • They're not annoying (except for Cueto);
  • They're not Canadian; and
  • They're not the Mets.

This last point is the most important (for me).  As you know, there are two more weeks of the Rugby World Cup and that is more than enough to occupy my attention.  In the spare moments when I am drawn into the World Series, however, it will be to watch those goddamn sons of whores, otherwise known as the mets, lose.
Chevy! Chevy! Astro! Astro!

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #28 on: October 22, 2015, 02:56:09 pm »

I never thought I would see anyone as hot as Beltran in the playoffs as an Astro. Murphy was a "who's he?" guy for me, but not any longer.

At least Beltran had a track record. Homers in 6 straight games? Murphy had 6 HR in April, May, and June.

Combined.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

BlownRanger

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 661
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #29 on: October 22, 2015, 04:43:39 pm »
At least Beltran had a track record. Homers in 6 straight games? Murphy had 6 HR in April, May, and June.

Combined.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No shit.  The guy's 30 years old, yet there will be no shortage of organizations assuming that the last week is the kind of production they can look forward to as opposed to the rest of the guy's six-year big league career.  It's been a fine career, and a lot of people seem to think Murphy's versatility makes him a Luhnow/Hinch kind of player.  I wouldn't mind him on the Astros, but not for the kind of coin this postseason will likely demand.
"He hit that one right up the poop chute, Bill" - Enos Cabell

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Cubs at Mets
« Reply #30 on: October 22, 2015, 05:37:15 pm »
Kessinger and Beckert up the middle. Billy Williams. Fergie Jenkins.

A lot easier to like back then; until Durocher got there, I guess.

Bite your tongue-I loved the Lip. I  saw him get run before a game started once.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius