Author Topic: Carter a short-timer?  (Read 10522 times)

pots

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4514
    • View Profile
Carter a short-timer?
« on: August 14, 2015, 08:21:31 am »
From mlbtr

Quote
The Astros have had a rough stretch of games on the road, but GM Jeff Luhnow tells the Houston Chronicle’s Evan Drellich that he’s confident due to the quality of pitching he’s received as well as the quality of upper-level players who will join the team in September. The Astros currently have a logjam of corner/DH options that will be magnified by the return of George Springer. As Drellich writes, though, it’s difficult to justify the loss of a player like Chris Carter for little to no return (that is, by way of DFA or waiver claim) when expanded rosters are just under two weeks away.

subnuclear

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6116
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2015, 08:36:30 am »
I read that as they will probably not resolve the logjam this season and will just send someone with options down if Springer is ready to play before the expanded roster.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #2 on: August 14, 2015, 08:46:18 am »
I read that as they will probably not resolve the logjam this season and will just send someone with options down if Springer is ready to play before the expanded roster.

Rosters can be expanded starting September 1.  There is no way Springer returns before then.
Goin' for a bus ride.

pots

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4514
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #3 on: August 14, 2015, 08:47:31 am »
I read that as they will probably not resolve the logjam this season and will just send someone with options down if Springer is ready to play before the expanded roster.

40 man is full.

But I could see Grossman, Buchanon and Cruz being possible options before Carter

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #4 on: August 14, 2015, 08:53:03 am »
40 man is full.

But I could see Grossman, Buchanon and Cruz being possible options before Carter

All spots on the infield are on a trajectory to be very crowded very quickly with better quality hitters.  Reed and Moran are ripping AA.  And Bregman is on about as fast a track as Correa was.  If all goes well for them next year all three of them could see major league at-bats next year.
Goin' for a bus ride.

pots

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4514
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2015, 09:03:35 am »
All spots on the infield are on a trajectory to be very crowded very quickly with better quality hitters.  Reed and Moran are ripping AA.  And Bregman is on about as fast a track as Correa was.  If all goes well for them next year all three of them could see major league at-bats next year.

And Tyler White is still making a mockery of AAA pitching.  I could see him being a September callup.  The thing that might hold him back is I don't think he needs to be added to the 40-man this year.  So you would really have to want his bat should you call him up. 

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #6 on: August 14, 2015, 09:20:43 am »

Uncle Charlie

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1072
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #7 on: August 14, 2015, 09:44:46 am »
Here is one man's two cents on Carter. http://www.astroscounty.com/2015/08/oh-no-not-more-words-about-chris-carter.html

Interesting take.  What is clear is that Valbuena has effectively taken on the CC 2014 role from what I can tell.  We have two of the same guy.

CC will be gone by December.
The test of a true champion is how he reacts to adversity on days when it is bound to come.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #8 on: August 14, 2015, 09:49:18 am »
Interesting take.  What is clear is that Valbuena has effectively taken on the CC 2014 role from what I can tell.  We have two of the same guy.

CC will be gone by December.

You're the first person who's ever projected Chris Carter's departure.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #9 on: August 14, 2015, 10:45:43 am »
Luhnow on 790 last night raved about TWhite.  He also made mention that since the Astros are getting production from other spots, having a 300 30 HR 1sts baseman isn't as needed.  He feels that the offense (other than on the road lately) is fine with playing someone who can field the position and bat 7+ in the order.
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #10 on: August 14, 2015, 10:47:13 am »
He also mentioned that T White was a different kind of prospect, and that he was a college senior and older.  I get the feeling that White is going to be getting ABs when the rosters expand.
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #11 on: August 14, 2015, 11:02:06 am »
Luhnow on 790 last night raved about TWhite.  He also made mention that since the Astros are getting production from other spots, having a 300 30 HR 1sts baseman isn't as needed.  He feels that the offense (other than on the road lately) is fine with playing someone who can field the position and bat 7+ in the order.

I'm not sure how Luhnow can be comfortable with this offense after this recent road trip. I hope White gets a chance. He may be exactly the type of hitter they need more of. I thought his defense was below average though.

jbm

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6615
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #12 on: August 14, 2015, 11:02:16 am »
He also made mention that since the Astros are getting production from other spots, having a 300 30 HR 1sts baseman isn't as needed.  He feels that the offense (other than on the road lately) is fine with playing someone who can field the position and bat 7+ in the order.
I must be watching a different team.  It's not like they have many positions that are dependably producing offense.

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #13 on: August 14, 2015, 11:08:19 am »
It could also be that Luhnow doesn't want to say shitty things about his team.  I have a feeling Ground Control can spit out some information just how "productive" the Astros are when hitting with RISP.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #14 on: August 14, 2015, 11:12:34 am »
I'm not sure how Luhnow can be comfortable with this offense after this recent road trip. I hope White gets a chance. He may be exactly the type of hitter they need more of. I thought his defense was below average though.

At 3b it's well below average.  1b is fine though I don't know how well he receives difficult throws at the bag.   But he's been DH'ing more than anything else.
Goin' for a bus ride.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #15 on: August 14, 2015, 11:37:33 am »
1b is fine though I don't know how well he receives difficult throws at the bag.

Oh, please. None of our guys ever make throws that are anything less than perfect.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #16 on: August 14, 2015, 12:03:25 pm »
I must be watching a different team.  It's not like they have many positions that are dependably producing offense.

The Astros are 5th, out of 30 teams in scoring runs.  2 runs behind the 4th place team and 12 runs out of 3rd.
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

pots

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4514
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #17 on: August 14, 2015, 12:07:12 pm »
The Astros are 5th, out of 30 teams in scoring runs.  2 runs behind the 4th place team and 12 runs out of 3rd.

Before the road trip they were 3rd

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #18 on: August 14, 2015, 12:09:11 pm »
Speaking of Singleton.  Since being sent down, In 9 games he is 6 of 32 (.188), 0 HR, 4 RBI, 5 BB, 11Ks.
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

OregonStrosFan

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12328
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #19 on: August 14, 2015, 01:26:47 pm »
Speaking of Singleton.  Since being sent down, In 9 games he is 6 of 32 (.188), 0 HR, 4 RBI, 5 BB, 11Ks.

And I presume that the previously DFAd (and now Padres pitcher) Bud Norris is still pissed that the Astros robbed Singleton by making him sign that $10M contract...
In the end, my dissolution with the game of baseball will not be a result of any loss of love for the game, rather from the realization that I can no longer bear the anger its supposed stewards cause to be built up in my soul. -Lee (01/08/2013)

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #20 on: August 14, 2015, 01:27:38 pm »
And I presume that the previously DFAd (and now Padres pitcher) Bud Norris is still pissed that the Astros robbed Singleton by making him sign that $10M contract...

That would require a little more contemplation than I think Bud is capable of.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

jbm

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6615
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #21 on: August 14, 2015, 03:33:59 pm »
The Astros are 5th, out of 30 teams in scoring runs.  2 runs behind the 4th place team and 12 runs out of 3rd.
Total runs is not a good measure of a good offense.  Consistency is important, as is the ability to manufacture runs in tight games.  It's similar to people looking at the Pythagorean formula to calculate wins.  The team might be under 500 and their reply is "But this stat says they really are good."  Cant rebut that.


subnuclear

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6116
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #22 on: August 14, 2015, 03:35:39 pm »
Rosters can be expanded starting September 1.  There is no way Springer returns before then.

Springer is cleared by the doctors for "baseball things" according to Chandler Rome.

pots

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4514
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #23 on: August 14, 2015, 03:46:57 pm »
Springer is cleared by the doctors for "baseball things" according to Chandler Rome.

like, like a lot

pots

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4514
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #24 on: August 14, 2015, 03:48:39 pm »
Total runs is not a good measure of a good offense.  Consistency is important, as is the ability to manufacture runs in tight games.  It's similar to people looking at the Pythagorean formula to calculate wins.  The team might be under 500 and their reply is "But this stat says they really are good."  Cant rebut that.

You mean like the fact that Oakland is +24 in the run column but 14 games below 500?

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #25 on: August 14, 2015, 04:02:12 pm »
Total runs is not a good measure of a good offense.  Consistency is important

So in 100 games, it is better to score 3 runs every single game than it is to score 450 total runs?
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

jbm

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6615
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #26 on: August 14, 2015, 04:16:15 pm »
Not sure what to make of your nonsensical example, but yes, I'd put my money on the team who gets those 4.5 per game with a series of 4,5,4,5,4,5,4,5 than getting it with 10,0,12,1,9,2,2,0.  Especially, if the team has really solid starters and bullpen.

Lefty

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3539
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #27 on: August 14, 2015, 04:37:00 pm »
So in 100 games, it is better to score 3 runs every single game than it is to score 450 total runs?

Stros average a bit over 4.3 runs per game.  If you say they split the games where they allow 4 runs since you can't score 4.3 runs (they're 13-9 in those, so say they go 11-11) If they scored exactly that, they'd be 70- 45.  I just took a quick and basic look at the numbers, but at least for this year's Stros consistency it seems would be better. 

Their record when scoring 4 or more is 52-9

They've yet to win a 1-0 game this year, 0-19 when scoring only 1.  2-10 with 2R, 8-9 with 3.
You may ask yourself, "How do I work this?"

MRaup

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11432
  • The goddamn Germans ain't got nothin to do with it
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #28 on: August 14, 2015, 07:02:23 pm »
Stros average a bit over 4.3 runs per game.  If you say they split the games where they allow 4 runs since you can't score 4.3 runs (they're 13-9 in those, so say they go 11-11) If they scored exactly that, they'd be 70- 45.  I just took a quick and basic look at the numbers, but at least for this year's Stros consistency it seems would be better. 

Their record when scoring 4 or more is 52-9

They've yet to win a 1-0 game this year, 0-19 when scoring only 1.  2-10 with 2R, 8-9 with 3.

But how many games have they won when the other team hasn't scored?!
"Terrorists, Sam. They've taken over my stomach and they're demanding beer." - Norm.

"Your words yield destruction, sorrow and are meant just to hate and hurt..." - Das

cougar

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1318
  • I dare you
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #29 on: August 14, 2015, 07:45:02 pm »
But how many games have they won when the other team hasn't scored?!

I'll go out on a limb and say at least a majority of them.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #30 on: August 14, 2015, 08:30:18 pm »
I'll go out on a limb and say at least a majority of them.

Please show your work.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

drew corleone

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2458
    • View Profile
    • http://2centmovies.blogspot.com
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #31 on: August 15, 2015, 12:44:27 am »
Stros average a bit over 4.3 runs per game.  If you say they split the games where they allow 4 runs since you can't score 4.3 runs (they're 13-9 in those, so say they go 11-11) If they scored exactly that, they'd be 70- 45.  I just took a quick and basic look at the numbers, but at least for this year's Stros consistency it seems would be better. 

Their record when scoring 4 or more is 52-9

They've yet to win a 1-0 game this year, 0-19 when scoring only 1.  2-10 with 2R, 8-9 with 3.

That's meaningless in a vacuum. Where do other top AL teams compare? Because I looked at their per-game scoring a month ago and concluded that outside of Toronto, neither the Yankees or Tigers (only better scoring teams than Houston at the time) were demonstratively "more consistent." By that I mean significantly more 3+ run games and/or fewer times shutout. Sure, you would like to consistently score a good amount of runs per game. And maybe the numbers over the last month show that the Astros have considerably fallen behind in this arena. But the fact is that they still have scored a shitload of runs, and the season is far from over,

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #32 on: August 15, 2015, 02:04:57 am »
That's meaningless in a vacuum. Where do other top AL teams compare? Because I looked at their per-game scoring a month ago and concluded that outside of Toronto, neither the Yankees or Tigers (only better scoring teams than Houston at the time) were demonstratively "more consistent." By that I mean significantly more 3+ run games and/or fewer times shutout. Sure, you would like to consistently score a good amount of runs per game. And maybe the numbers over the last month show that the Astros have considerably fallen behind in this arena. But the fact is that they still have scored a shitload of runs, and the season is far from over,

Insert nodding head animated gif here.
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

Lefty

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3539
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #33 on: August 15, 2015, 08:15:52 am »
That's meaningless in a vacuum.

Of course it is.  I was bored and tired of being out in the heat. 
You may ask yourself, "How do I work this?"

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #34 on: August 15, 2015, 08:43:21 am »
speaking of heat you should hear my son in  laws argument on why there is no ac for the rangers, he has this whole well laid out argument,, btw he is a lawyer . go figure
forever is composed entirely of nows

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #35 on: August 15, 2015, 09:38:01 am »
speaking of heat you should hear my son in  laws argument on why there is no ac for the rangers, he has this whole well laid out argument,, btw he is a lawyer . go figure

What is his hypothesis?

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #36 on: August 15, 2015, 09:53:57 am »
What is his hypothesis?

Maybe he's confused about the whole "bring the heat" thing.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #37 on: August 15, 2015, 04:05:47 pm »
What is his hypothesis?
That Air Conditioning is a pointless waste of money and energy at an outdoor stadium?
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

MRaup

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11432
  • The goddamn Germans ain't got nothin to do with it
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #38 on: August 15, 2015, 04:13:12 pm »
What is his hypothesis?

Rangers brass, much like their fan base, are fucking idiots.
"Terrorists, Sam. They've taken over my stomach and they're demanding beer." - Norm.

"Your words yield destruction, sorrow and are meant just to hate and hurt..." - Das

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #39 on: August 15, 2015, 05:54:46 pm »
Rangers brass, much like their fan base, are fucking idiots.

I'm sure they think it's some sort of home-field advantage. Although they might reconsider that position if they bothered to think about the number of games each of their opponents plays in that furnace as opposed to the number of games their own team plays there.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Col. Sphinx Drummond

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16760
  • art is a bulwark against the irrationality of man
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #40 on: August 17, 2015, 08:38:41 pm »
I'm sure they think it's some sort of home-field advantage. Although they might reconsider that position if they bothered to think about the number of games each of their opponents plays in that furnace as opposed to the number of games their own team plays there.

That and the fact that the weather changes in September and October.
Everyone's talking, few of them know
The rest are pretending, they put on a show
And if there's a message I guess this is it
Truth isn't easy, the easy part's shit

pots

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4514
    • View Profile

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #42 on: August 18, 2015, 11:51:56 am »
Tyler White has got to be making the brass wonder if they should wait till September.
I've noticed that too. His AVG "fell" to about .365 recently, but he's brought it up again. And there's this:

Quote
FRESNO, Calif. - Fresno Grizzlies (74-48) first baseman Tyler White improved his batting average with runners on base to .500 (39-78)
That's... good, right?
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #43 on: August 18, 2015, 12:01:53 pm »
Tyler White has got to be making the brass wonder if they should wait till September.

One rookie with no MLB experience isn't going to make a difference.  The only player currently contributing offensively on a consistent basis is Altuve.  Everyone else is contributing either very sporadically or not at all.  They need 2 or 3 more regulars to start hitting better again.
Goin' for a bus ride.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #44 on: August 18, 2015, 12:04:58 pm »
It seems a little harsh not to peg Correa as pretty consistent.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #45 on: August 18, 2015, 12:15:09 pm »
It seems a little harsh not to peg Correa as pretty consistent.

When you're walked as much as he has been it's hard contribute at the plate.
Goin' for a bus ride.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #46 on: August 18, 2015, 12:37:16 pm »
When you're walked as much as he has been it's hard contribute at the plate.

Well, a walk's a contribution.  There's just no one behind him to make teams pay for walking him.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

pots

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4514
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #47 on: August 18, 2015, 12:52:34 pm »
One rookie with no MLB experience isn't going to make a difference.  The only player currently contributing offensively on a consistent basis is Altuve.  Everyone else is contributing either very sporadically or not at all.  They need 2 or 3 more regulars to start hitting better again.

Wasn't trying to paint him as some sort of savior.  But he could make a difference.  Anyone of them can make a difference.  MLB experience is not required to make a difference.  The guy is swinging a hot bat.  Carter has a lot of his playing time.  Carter seems destined to a path of release prior to arbitration.  Not a whole lot lost cutting bait with him now.   Also removing him from the 40-man now while he is still owed a million this year might allow you to keep him in the minors.     At minimum they save a million. 
« Last Edit: August 18, 2015, 01:08:21 pm by pots »

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #48 on: August 18, 2015, 12:56:52 pm »
It seems a little harsh not to peg Correa as pretty consistent.

Rasmus has had some big hits lately and Marwin contributes, it seems, whenever he is given an opportunity.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #49 on: August 18, 2015, 01:15:37 pm »

Carter seems destined to a path of release prior to arbitration.  Not a whole lot lost cutting bait with him now.   

They might be holding on to him in hopes of a rebate in arbitration.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #50 on: August 18, 2015, 01:24:26 pm »
Seriously though, I doubt they DFA him.  Carter power doesn't grow on trees, and you'd feel like a fool if a competitor picked him up and his bat heated up.  More importantly, it might cost the team a postseason spot.  Maybe they try to pass him through waivers and trade him for cash to a non-contender?  Don't know if that's a realistic option.  You need only look at the careers of guys like Mark Reynolds and Chris Davis to see that Chris Carter types still get ABs and have value, even on decent to good teams.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
« Last Edit: August 18, 2015, 01:26:36 pm by hostros7 »

pots

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4514
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #51 on: August 18, 2015, 01:37:38 pm »
They might be holding on to him in hopes of a rebate in arbitration.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Does that happen?

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #52 on: August 18, 2015, 01:49:30 pm »

Does that happen?

No


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #53 on: August 18, 2015, 04:10:20 pm »
call me confused
forever is composed entirely of nows

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #54 on: August 18, 2015, 05:02:38 pm »
Seriously though, I doubt they DFA him.  Carter power doesn't grow on trees, and you'd feel like a fool if a competitor picked him up and his bat heated up.  More importantly, it might cost the team a postseason spot.  Maybe they try to pass him through waivers and trade him for cash to a non-contender?  Don't know if that's a realistic option.  You need only look at the careers of guys like Mark Reynolds and Chris Davis to see that Chris Carter types still get ABs and have value, even on decent to good teams.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

for how long does the bat stayed heated.  3 years, maybe, the end of the season and then it goes cold again, I don't think that would bother me.  And I don't make the decisions, so eh.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #55 on: August 18, 2015, 05:55:28 pm »
for how long does the bat stayed heated
by Budgirl


for how long does the bat stayed heated. 

3 years,
maybe, the end of the season

and then


          it goes cold again,

I
don't think
that would bother
me. 

And
I
don't make the decisions,

                                               so eh.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

Knoxbanedoodle

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2542
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #56 on: August 18, 2015, 06:22:57 pm »
*Knoxbanedoodle ovates Reuben standing, throws roses onto the stage, shouts enthusiastic hoorays in a variety of languages*

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #57 on: August 18, 2015, 06:43:56 pm »
I'm going to read everyone's GZ posts tonight in what I imagine to be their poetry voice, you know, loaded with inappropriate pauses and idiotic inflections.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

geezerdonk

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3342
  • a long tradition of existence
    • View Profile
Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #58 on: August 18, 2015, 06:50:45 pm »
And order the large cappuccino. 
E come vivo? Vivo.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #59 on: August 18, 2015, 09:22:19 pm »
for how long does the bat stayed heated
by Budgirl


for how long does the bat stayed heated. 

3 years,
maybe, the end of the season

and then


          it goes cold again,

I
don't think
that would bother
me. 

And
I
don't make the decisions,

                                               so eh.

That's a thing of beauty
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

geezerdonk

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3342
  • a long tradition of existence
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #60 on: August 19, 2015, 07:36:38 am »
What if Carter were to be thinking about White's stats and not watch where he is going and accidentally fall and hurt himself and wind up on the disabled list?
E come vivo? Vivo.

kevwun

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 940
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #61 on: August 19, 2015, 09:35:00 am »
White doesn't strikeout much and the lineup in the future could use that.  Hopefully he can make the transition.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2015, 09:48:08 am by kevwun »
Crazy Joe McCluskey was fucking nuts.  It's why they called him Crazy Joe.

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #62 on: August 19, 2015, 09:45:42 am »
Hinch on Marwin: "He gets to play tomorrow. Not sure which position, but he's earned it."

While I hate losing his versatility off the bench, at this point in the season you have to put your best players in the field.   I'd like to see Marwin starting at least 4 out of every 5 games.   Let Valbuean/Gattis platoon at DH.
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #63 on: August 19, 2015, 12:30:04 pm »
call me confused
What?  And have someone call Cabrera on us?
Up in the Air

pots

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4514
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #64 on: August 19, 2015, 12:39:29 pm »
What?  And have someone call Cabrera on us?

It's like the pot calling itself black

Andyzipp

  • Guest
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #65 on: August 20, 2015, 01:41:49 pm »
call me confused

You could have posted this exact same thing 5822 posts ago, and it would still be just as accurate.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #66 on: August 21, 2015, 01:09:10 pm »
Last night was another example of Carter's worthlessness.  You're getting dominated, not managing to get anything going, but down to your last handful of outs, it's still only a 1-0 game.  You know you're not going to string together three or four hits against Archer, but you still have that puncher's chance.  Maybe Archer makes a mistake on pitch 95, maybe you get that one good swing to tie it up.  You need a guy who can go up there, make a pitcher pitch, and if he gets that mistake can hammer it.  If Carter is not that guy, it's reason number umpteen thousand why he's pointless. 
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

pots

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4514
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #67 on: August 21, 2015, 01:18:09 pm »
Last night was another example of Carter's worthlessness.  You're getting dominated, not managing to get anything going, but down to your last handful of outs, it's still only a 1-0 game.  You know you're not going to string together three or four hits against Archer, but you still have that puncher's chance.  Maybe Archer makes a mistake on pitch 95, maybe you get that one good swing to tie it up.  You need a guy who can go up there, make a pitcher pitch, and if he gets that mistake can hammer it.  If Carter is not that guy, it's reason number umpteen thousand why he's pointless.

I thought the lack of use in a 13 inning affair the night before was pretty telling.  Historically he has been horrendous pinch hitting.  Only 30 PAs but it's about as bad as it comes.  045/233/182

I'm guessing he's pretty much just going to see starts against lefties for a while.  And that's only because Valbueana is not good against them.  Marwin is though. 
« Last Edit: August 21, 2015, 01:26:09 pm by pots »

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #68 on: August 21, 2015, 01:26:01 pm »
Last night was another example of Carter's worthlessness.  You're getting dominated, not managing to get anything going, but down to your last handful of outs, it's still only a 1-0 game.  You know you're not going to string together three or four hits against Archer, but you still have that puncher's chance.  Maybe Archer makes a mistake on pitch 95, maybe you get that one good swing to tie it up.  You need a guy who can go up there, make a pitcher pitch, and if he gets that mistake can hammer it.  If Carter is not that guy, it's reason number umpteen thousand why he's pointless.

he looks totally lost at the plate. too much thinking, perhaps, instead of simply "see the ball, hit the ball."
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #69 on: August 21, 2015, 01:35:21 pm »
he looks totally lost at the plate. too much thinking, perhaps, instead of simply "see the ball, hit the ball."

This is where I can tolerate Gattis's approach sometimes.  He frustrates the hell out of me sometimes because he swings at so many bad pitches, but in some situations, you need a guy who goes up there with the attitude of "I don't give a shit about working an at bat, if that ball comes within three feet of me, I'm gonna smack it".  Not that you want him to swing at bad pitches, but you want that aggressiveness.  Carter simply does not have it.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

subnuclear

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6116
    • View Profile
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #70 on: August 21, 2015, 01:53:43 pm »
Here is a nice post at AstrosCounty about Chris Carter. To summarize, they succeeded in making him less of a pull-hitter and get pitchers to throw him more strikes, but they lost the thing he was really good at which was explosive power.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #71 on: August 21, 2015, 03:44:27 pm »
Here is a nice post at AstrosCounty about Chris Carter. To summarize, they succeeded in making him less of a pull-hitter and get pitchers to throw him more strikes, but they lost the thing he was really good at which was explosive power.
And hitting fastballs. He used to be good at that but terrible vs. sliders. Now he doesn't chase so many sliders, but I think his AVG vs. fastballs is something like .144, unsurprisingly the worst in MLB.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

das

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3465
    • View Profile
    • Faith Home Ministries
Re: Carter a short-timer?
« Reply #72 on: August 21, 2015, 04:21:19 pm »
And hitting fastballs. He used to be good at that but terrible vs. sliders. Now he doesn't chase so many sliders, but I think his AVG vs. fastballs is something like .144, unsurprisingly the worst in MLB.

There was a decent thread here in the TZ last year that discussed Carters power specifics. What struck me is that large numbers of his HR's were eking over the wall instead of mammoth blasts to the upper deck. A sharp hit to a mediocre slider that he gets under sure sounds like a warning track shot instead of out relative to a sharp hit to a fastball in that circumstance.
Another trenchant comment by a jealous lesser intellect.