Author Topic: ESPN.com on Astros  (Read 3091 times)

David in Jackson

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2465
    • View Profile
"I literally love Justin Verlander." -- Jose Altuve

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2013, 11:07:46 am »
Quote from: Luhnow
I like it. It's an opportunity to find a particular kind of player, a hitter who may be more limited defensively. In the National League, you can get such a pileup at first base or left field.

He does realise that every other team in the AL, most of whom have a salary budget far in excess of $30mm, are allowed to have DH too...right?  I'm trying to decide if this is more or less stupid than hitting the pitcher 8th, and I can't decide.  That's not a good thing.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2013, 11:11:20 am »
He does realise that every other team in the AL, most of whom have a salary budget far in excess of $30mm, are allowed to have DH too...right?  I'm trying to decide if this is more or less stupid than hitting the pitcher 8th, and I can't decide.  That's not a good thing.

I think he's happy to have another toy to play with when putting the roster together. 
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2013, 11:14:03 am »
He does realise that every other team in the AL, most of whom have a salary budget far in excess of $30mm, are allowed to have DH too...right?  I'm trying to decide if this is more or less stupid than hitting the pitcher 8th, and I can't decide.  That's not a good thing.

What else could he have said?
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

jbm

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6615
    • View Profile
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2013, 11:17:23 am »
Quote
Carter's playing experience in the outfield amounts to 85 games across eight seasons as a pro, and none in the majors since 2010, when he was fairly brutal in left for the A's. And the bulky Wallace's best position ever since he was drafted in 2008 -- by Luhnow and the Cardinals -- was always “hitter.” Although Luhnow cited last year's five-start experiment with Wallace at the hot corner as an indication he will be able to handle the position in 2013.
This quote will inspire the pitching staff.  

The meaning of "handle the position" must be very broad.  

geezerdonk

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3342
  • a long tradition of existence
    • View Profile
ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2013, 11:41:16 am »
By handle the position, I think it is meant that Wallace is adequate to stand at third and watch the 400' shots sail over the outfield fence.
E come vivo? Vivo.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2013, 11:59:19 am »
What else could he have said?

He could have said a lot of other things that did not consist of anally-directed smog.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

astrosfan76

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2194
    • View Profile
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #7 on: February 15, 2013, 12:25:35 pm »
What else could he have said?

Yep, they can continue whining about having to move, or move on and deal with the hand they've been given (or whatever verb you find appropriate).  Whether he's genuinely happy about the move is irrelevant (and not something the public's likely to discover), but he's smart enough to look for advantages in the system and apply them to their situation. 

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #8 on: February 15, 2013, 01:58:42 pm »
Yep, they can continue whining about having to move, or move on and deal with the hand they've been given (or whatever verb you find appropriate).  Whether he's genuinely happy about the move is irrelevant (and not something the public's likely to discover), but he's smart enough to look for advantages in the system and apply them to their situation.  

I'm not sure how having a whole roster, being paid only marginally more than your opponent's DH, is an advantage.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #9 on: February 15, 2013, 02:55:19 pm »
So that's Wallace's new swing, huh?
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

astrosfan76

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2194
    • View Profile
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #10 on: February 15, 2013, 04:31:10 pm »
I'm not sure how having a whole roster, being paid only marginally more than your opponent's DH, is an advantage.

Not advantages relative to the competition, but advantages relative to the rules of the new league versus those of the NL.  The results may (will) still be ugly, but he can give certain players more ABs in the AL, which helps him in assessing which players are part of the future.  So, from a talent evaluation standpoint, I get what he is saying.  I still hate the move, but there's not anything they can do at this point, so might as well make the best of it.

Noe

  • Guest
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2013, 11:14:42 am »
I still hate the move, but there's not anything they can do at this point, so might as well make the best of it.

Must. Fight. Urge to post inappropriate Coach Knight reset!

Col. Sphinx Drummond

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16760
  • art is a bulwark against the irrationality of man
    • View Profile
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #12 on: February 16, 2013, 11:37:15 am »
Must. Fight. Urge to post inappropriate Coach Knight reset!

Don't pull a Clayton Williams.
Everyone's talking, few of them know
The rest are pretending, they put on a show
And if there's a message I guess this is it
Truth isn't easy, the easy part's shit

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #13 on: February 18, 2013, 09:26:21 am »
Don't pull a Clayton Williams.

Never go full Clayton.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #14 on: February 19, 2013, 10:53:05 am »
From the Grantland wing of ESPN is an article calling the Mets' current outfield possibly "the worst unit in professional sports and maybe all of life." 

Whoa ho, you say?  What about the Astros?  The author excuses the Astros' inadequacies because "[t]hey're less a pro sports franchise and more a socioeconomic thought experiment at this point."

I think I'm stealing that line for 2013's These Are Your Astros!
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

David in Jackson

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2465
    • View Profile
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #15 on: February 19, 2013, 01:22:33 pm »
From the Grantland wing of ESPN is an article calling the Mets' current outfield possibly "the worst unit in professional sports and maybe all of life." 

Whoa ho, you say?  What about the Astros?  The author excuses the Astros' inadequacies because "[t]hey're less a pro sports franchise and more a socioeconomic thought experiment at this point."

I think I'm stealing that line for 2013's These Are Your Astros!

Hey, it's a process.
"I literally love Justin Verlander." -- Jose Altuve

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #16 on: February 19, 2013, 04:08:44 pm »
Hey, it's a process.

Like processing sewage?
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #17 on: February 19, 2013, 04:25:03 pm »
From the Grantland wing of ESPN is an article calling the Mets' current outfield possibly "the worst unit in professional sports and maybe all of life." 

Whoa ho, you say?  What about the Astros?  The author excuses the Astros' inadequacies because "[t]hey're less a pro sports franchise and more a socioeconomic thought experiment at this point."

I think I'm stealing that line for 2013's These Are Your Astros!
The Astros' 2013 OF, as bad as it is likely to be, actually has a pretty good chance to be better than what the Mets are planning to throw out there. If only I could be sure that Dominguez is the 2nd coming of David Wright, then I could say their infield will be better, too.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

Mike S.

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 288
    • View Profile
Re: ESPN.com on Astros
« Reply #18 on: February 20, 2013, 12:40:42 am »
From the Grantland wing of ESPN is an article calling the Mets' current outfield possibly "the worst unit in professional sports and maybe all of life." 

Whoa ho, you say?  What about the Astros?  The author excuses the Astros' inadequacies because "[t]hey're less a pro sports franchise and more a socioeconomic thought experiment at this point."

I think I'm stealing that line for 2013's These Are Your Astros!

No, no.  This is accurate.  By "virtue" of being the goddamn, motherfucking steM, they automatically qualify as being the worst in all of life.  I think that actually would be redundant.
Chevy! Chevy! Astro! Astro!