Author Topic: Astros contract obligations  (Read 3471 times)

OregonStrosFan

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12328
    • View Profile
Astros contract obligations
« on: May 16, 2012, 02:59:06 pm »
In the end, my dissolution with the game of baseball will not be a result of any loss of love for the game, rather from the realization that I can no longer bear the anger its supposed stewards cause to be built up in my soul. -Lee (01/08/2013)

subnuclear

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6116
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #1 on: May 16, 2012, 03:03:32 pm »
Basically, the team's contract commitments for next year are below Carlos Lee's current salary.

Matt

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3578
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #2 on: May 16, 2012, 03:10:20 pm »
Is that the first information about Carlos wanting to stay after this year?

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #3 on: May 16, 2012, 03:22:40 pm »
Is that the first information about Carlos wanting to stay after this year?

No.  He has a ranch near by.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Matt

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3578
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #4 on: May 16, 2012, 03:24:12 pm »
No.  He has a ranch near by.

Yeah I knew that but didn't know he wanted to stay and continue playing. I guess it makes sense though.

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2012, 03:35:36 pm »
the horse needs to gallop off into the sunset.
forever is composed entirely of nows

jbm

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6615
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #6 on: May 16, 2012, 03:44:01 pm »
Does Carlos really fit as a DH anyway?  I never thought he was a liability in the field, either in left or at first, so it's not like he is one of those slugs that can't field a position.  I just wonder if he will hit well enough to justify a DH position, at any salary level.  In other words, if he could still hit, play him at first and find an all hit/no field slug for DH. 

btw.  I like Lee, and still think he gives some of the most professional ABs on the club, he just doesn't seem to have much pop anymore. 

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #7 on: May 16, 2012, 03:46:26 pm »
If Carlos was willing to play at a reasonable wage, 5-8 million, why wouldn't they want him back?  Who is going to play 1st/DH next year?  Brett Wallace?

Carlos is playing well and has gotten steadily better in the field.
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #8 on: May 16, 2012, 03:56:04 pm »
If Carlos was willing to play at a reasonable wage, 5-8 million, why wouldn't they want him back?  Who is going to play 1st/DH next year?  Brett Wallace?

Carlos is playing well and has gotten steadily better in the field.

Carlos appears to be the club's best current option at 1B in 2013, barring some free agent signing (seriously doubtful) or a prospect getting ready earlier than expected. I'm concerned about his loss of power, which is going to be more necessary next season, but I like him a lot in the clubhouse for the young players. However, as to price, I doubt that Lunhow is going to go as high as you suggest. If Carlos really wants to play here, he'll probably have to play for less than $5 million, and with only a one year deal. I don't know what his available alternatives will be at season's end, or even if he is even an Astro at season's end.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #9 on: May 16, 2012, 04:13:55 pm »
If Carlos was willing to play at a reasonable wage, 5-8 million,

You're contradicting yourself.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #10 on: May 16, 2012, 04:14:14 pm »
Carlos appears to be the club's best current option at 1B in 2013, barring some free agent signing (seriously doubtful) or a prospect getting ready earlier than expected. I'm concerned about his loss of power, which is going to be more necessary next season, but I like him a lot in the clubhouse for the young players. However, as to price, I doubt that Lunhow is going to go as high as you suggest. If Carlos really wants to play here, he'll probably have to play for less than $5 million, and with only a one year deal. I don't know what his available alternatives will be at season's end, or even if he is even an Astro at season's end.

Singleton will be the opening day 1b.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #11 on: May 16, 2012, 04:19:45 pm »
cant you imagine management just salivating over the thought of lees salary being freed up
forever is composed entirely of nows

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #12 on: May 16, 2012, 04:25:20 pm »
You're contradicting yourself.

Ha! I just don't keep up with contracts like I used to I guess.  What kind of money would Carlos draw as a free agent?
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #13 on: May 16, 2012, 04:30:38 pm »
Ha! I just don't keep up with contracts like I used to I guess.  What kind of money would Carlos draw as a free agent?

$1.5-$2M.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

moriartp

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3203
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #14 on: May 16, 2012, 04:31:34 pm »
Singleton will be the opening day 1b.

Any reason for saying so? Under Wade I imagine that'd be true, but the new guys might prefer to let him develop.


What kind of money would Carlos draw as a free agent?

Not saying it's necessarily a great comparison, but Vlad Guerrero just signed with the Jays for a prorated $1.3mm after not finding a job in the offseason.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #15 on: May 16, 2012, 04:32:54 pm »
Any reason for saying so? Under Wade I imagine that'd be true, but the new guys might prefer to let him develop.

He'll have either a full season of AA, or a mix of AA/AAA, plus a September call up.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #16 on: May 16, 2012, 04:42:19 pm »
Singleton will be the opening day 1b.

Do you think so? I'm not up on the farm system under the new regime, but I'd think that he'd be the guy in 2014. Maybe I'm dead ass wrong. If he's ready, then I say play him.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

geezerdonk

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3342
  • a long tradition of existence
    • View Profile
Astros contract obligations
« Reply #17 on: May 16, 2012, 04:44:18 pm »
I would like to see Downs get an opportunity to play full time.

Can Fernando Martinez play first?
E come vivo? Vivo.

moriartp

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3203
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #18 on: May 16, 2012, 04:45:12 pm »
It'll be nice if another few months of development is all Singleton needs, but I think that's a pretty optimistic timetable. His numbers have fallen off a cliff recently, and he hasn't done jack against lefties. That doesn't mean he won't be good, it just shows that he's a 20-year-old in AA who could use some more time to hone his skills. There's no rush.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Astros contract obligations
« Reply #19 on: May 16, 2012, 05:53:00 pm »
I would like to see Downs get an opportunity to play full time.

Can Fernando Martinez play first?

Matt Downs is a lot like Travis Buck: better as a utility player. If Downs is a starter, then, in my opinion, the club is really is bad shape.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius