Author Topic: Bourgeois transaction?  (Read 20213 times)

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Bourgeois transaction?
« on: March 20, 2012, 02:46:58 pm »
LeTweet

Astros close clubhouse. Nothing confirmed but it sounds like Jason Bourgeois transaction in works. Healthy scratch. Mills wouldn't discuss.

The healthy scratch part is confusing. 
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2012, 02:49:00 pm »
LeTweet

Astros close clubhouse. Nothing confirmed but it sounds like Jason Bourgeois transaction in works. Healthy scratch. Mills wouldn't discuss.

The healthy scratch part is confusing. 

I think that just means he was scratched from the lineup, but not because of any injury.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2012, 02:52:09 pm »
I think that just means he was scratched from the lineup, but not because of any injury.

That makes sense. 
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

jbm

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6615
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2012, 02:56:57 pm »
If he is gone, let's hope Schafer stays healthy.  Maybe Bogusevic can play the position, but Shuck really can't IMO. 

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2012, 03:00:43 pm »
If he is gone, let's hope Schafer stays healthy.  Maybe Bogusevic can play the position, but Shuck really can't IMO. 

"Shuck" should be an adjective to describe what he does in the outfield.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Ty in Tampa

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 9111
  • You just gotta keep livin' man, L-I-V-I-N
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2012, 03:04:29 pm »
That makes sense. 

Don't watch much hockey?
"You want me broken. You want me dead.
I'm living rent-free in the back of your head."

Anit

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 657
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #6 on: March 20, 2012, 03:05:41 pm »
Brian McTaggart ‏ @brianmctaggart
Quintero hugging teammates in clubhouse

Brian McTaggart ‏ @brianmctaggart
Jason Bourgeois tells teammates goodbye
« Last Edit: March 20, 2012, 03:09:47 pm by Anit »

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #7 on: March 20, 2012, 03:10:17 pm »
And the media is not allowed in the clubhouse.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #8 on: March 20, 2012, 03:13:00 pm »
Don't watch much hockey?

Not with the sound on. 

Honestly, I didn't even think about "scratch" in terms of the lineup.  Injury, money, a euphemism for "scoop" that I hadn't heard before.  All of that was running through my head instead of the obvious meaning. 
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #9 on: March 20, 2012, 03:13:32 pm »
Chatter says they're going to the Royals.
Goin' for a bus ride.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #11 on: March 20, 2012, 03:16:18 pm »
Chatter says they're going to the Royals.

Always a good system to do deals with.

"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #12 on: March 20, 2012, 03:17:04 pm »
MLBTR says both are gone, but destination not yet known.

They float the Phillies for their need of catching depth.  That would be comfortably familiar.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #13 on: March 20, 2012, 03:21:08 pm »
Most reporters are saying Royals now.  Apparently they've been scouting Q lately.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #14 on: March 20, 2012, 03:21:26 pm »
I'll miss Q. Clearly the odd man out but it was fun watching that tough SOB gun guys down.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #15 on: March 20, 2012, 03:23:52 pm »
I'll miss Q. Clearly the odd man out but it was fun watching that tough SOB gun guys down.

I will too. He wasn't as effective last season, but I think that he was hurting. And, the baserunners learned the hard way to stay alive when Q was behind the dish.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #16 on: March 20, 2012, 03:24:47 pm »
I'll miss Q. Clearly the odd man out but it was fun watching that tough SOB gun guys down.

Me too.  He also gave fantastic interviews.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

jbm

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6615
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #17 on: March 20, 2012, 03:25:16 pm »
I'll miss Q also.

Curious as to what position they will get back.  I was thinking about a fourth outfielder who could play center, but that is what they are giving up, so ..........

OregonStrosFan

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12328
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #18 on: March 20, 2012, 03:25:41 pm »
I'll miss Q. Clearly the odd man out but it was fun watching that tough SOB gun guys down.

REALLY liked Q.  Exactly what a team should have in terms of a back-up catcher.
In the end, my dissolution with the game of baseball will not be a result of any loss of love for the game, rather from the realization that I can no longer bear the anger its supposed stewards cause to be built up in my soul. -Lee (01/08/2013)

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #19 on: March 20, 2012, 03:29:16 pm »
REALLY liked Q.  Exactly what a team should have in terms of a back-up catcher.

Sure, but he usually had to start.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #20 on: March 20, 2012, 03:36:42 pm »
Quote
@MarkBermanFox26
OF Jason Bourgeois & C Humberto Quintero confirm for FOX 26 they have been traded. Neither player can say where & Astros have no comment.

I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #21 on: March 20, 2012, 03:38:36 pm »
To Royals for lefty Kevin Chapman and a PTBNL.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

moriartp

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3203
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #22 on: March 20, 2012, 03:40:30 pm »
To Royals for lefty Kevin Chapman and a PTBNL.

High-strikeout, high-walk relief prospect. Stats

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #23 on: March 20, 2012, 03:42:36 pm »
High-strikeout, high-walk relief prospect. Stats

Not among Sickels' top 22 Royals prospects
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #24 on: March 20, 2012, 03:43:26 pm »
Pro career:  80 innings, 110 K's, 36 BB's. 
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #25 on: March 20, 2012, 03:44:27 pm »
DoRay had the third edition fielding bible author on recently, and asked him who was the Stros best defensive player.  He said Q, with about 12 saved runs.  Made perfect sense to me.

Wonder why the Royals need Bourgeois?
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #26 on: March 20, 2012, 03:44:38 pm »
Not among Sickels' top 22 Royals prospects


Baseball America says Chapman had the best slider in the Royals system.

Link
« Last Edit: March 20, 2012, 03:46:18 pm by Bench »
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #27 on: March 20, 2012, 03:45:08 pm »
According to Danny Knobler, the trade was a good job for Dayton Moore (Royals GM).
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #28 on: March 20, 2012, 03:45:48 pm »
Wonder why the Royals need Bourgeois?

Doubts about Lorenzo Cain, apparently.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #29 on: March 20, 2012, 03:47:06 pm »
According to Danny Knobler, the trade was a good job for Dayton Moore (Royals GM).

Really depends on the PTBNL, doesn't it?  The Pence deal looked even better once Santana was identified.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

jbm

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6615
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #30 on: March 20, 2012, 03:47:29 pm »
DoRay had the third edition fielding bible author on recently, and asked him who was the Stros best defensive player.  He said Q, with about 12 saved runs.  Made perfect sense to me.

Wonder why the Royals need Bourgeois?

It's looking more and more that defense doesn't factor into Luhnow's decision science.  

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #31 on: March 20, 2012, 03:49:04 pm »
It's looking more and more that defense doesn't factor into Luhnow's decision science. 

Welcome to the AL, baby!
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #32 on: March 20, 2012, 03:51:14 pm »
It's looking more and more that defense doesn't factor into Luhnow's decision science.  

Ks + hitting over defense is the New Way.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

EasTexAstro

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5748
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #33 on: March 20, 2012, 03:51:27 pm »
I'll join in with the chorus. I'll miss HQ.
It's my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of 'em was one kinda sombitch or another.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #34 on: March 20, 2012, 03:54:26 pm »
Ks + hitting over defense is the New Way.

Looking at the Astros last year, they had two HUGE problems...one, they had trouble getting a lead and two, they couldn't hold it if they *did* manage to get one.  Trying to upgrade the offense or the pen on *this* team isn't necessarily a sign that the GM doesn't value defense.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #35 on: March 20, 2012, 03:55:40 pm »
Looking at the Astros last year, they had two HUGE problems...one, they had trouble getting a lead and two, they couldn't hold it if they *did* manage to get one.  Trying to upgrade the offense or the pen on *this* team isn't necessarily a sign that the GM doesn't value defense.

Getting talent - period - onto this team is priority one.  Both of these guys are spare parts even on this sad-sack team.  You just hope and pray that they turned into one usuable talent.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #36 on: March 20, 2012, 03:58:49 pm »
Who is this fucking guy?

Per Ted Berg on Twitter: Jason Bourgeois has been dealt for a Crate and Barrel catalog and a Thomas Kinkade painting to be named later.

I saw Chapman throw at Florida against LSU. He's raw but has talent. And he's a lefty.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #37 on: March 20, 2012, 04:03:08 pm »
Getting talent - period - onto this team is priority one.  Both of these guys are spare parts even on this sad-sack team.  You just hope and pray that they turned into one usuable talent.

Exactly.  Bourgeois and Q, as much as I like both of them, very well might not have made the big club for opening day this season.

A lefty fire-baller with two years of professional service?  That could definitely be useful.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #38 on: March 20, 2012, 04:04:15 pm »
He's raw but has talent. And he's a lefty.

This right here.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

jbm

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6615
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #39 on: March 20, 2012, 04:05:30 pm »
Getting talent - period - onto this team is priority one.  Both of these guys are spare parts even on this sad-sack team.  You just hope and pray that they turned into one usuable talent.

I agree with this if we are just isolating this move, but overall, his moves scream "offense first."  Cust, Lowrie, Wallace at third?, jettisoning Q and Bourgeois.  None seem to even a pay a glancing nod to defense.  Maybe it is the future, or the AL.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #40 on: March 20, 2012, 04:06:09 pm »
Luhnow pulled a Kate Middleton, turning a Bourgeois into a Royal.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #41 on: March 20, 2012, 04:08:52 pm »
Luhnow pulled a Kate Middleton, turning a Bourgeois into a Royal.

Golf clap, counselor.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #42 on: March 20, 2012, 04:10:00 pm »
Q was on the outs, getting older and more expensive. Boojwah was a tweener with limited offense to offer. Neither of these guys would make a difference on the 2012 Astros, no how no way. This team needs everything, and it needs it young. They got just about all there was to get from Q and Boojwah.

Cust is a flyer for walks and power. Lowrie was probably the best shot they could take to have a SS with some offense too. Wallace is about to get squeezed out of a position. I don't see the problems with these moves.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #43 on: March 20, 2012, 04:12:35 pm »
I agree with this if we are just isolating this move, but overall, his moves scream "offense first."  Cust, Lowrie, Wallace at third?, jettisoning Q and Bourgeois.  None seem to even a pay a glancing nod to defense.  Maybe it is the future, or the AL.

All of these are attempts to get talent on the field.  Did you really expect them to pay $11M to Clint Barmes?  Wallace has talent, why not try to get him in the lineup?  Cust was nothing more than a flyer, and I'll be shocked if they keep him.

Sorry, but I feel like you're seeing patterns where there are none.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #44 on: March 20, 2012, 04:16:54 pm »
I agree with this if we are just isolating this move, but overall, his moves scream "offense first."  Cust, Lowrie, Wallace at third?, jettisoning Q and Bourgeois.  None seem to even a pay a glancing nod to defense.  Maybe it is the future, or the AL.

I'm sorry to see Q go, and I liked Bourgeois a lot, but Castro is this team's primary catcher, and Bourgeois was a spare part.  If they got anything for the trade, that's value given the team they need to field.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #45 on: March 20, 2012, 04:25:21 pm »
I'm sorry to see Q go, and I liked Bourgeois a lot, but Castro is this team's primary catcher, and Bourgeois was a spare part.  If they got anything for the trade, that's value given the team they need to field.

+1
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

jbm

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6615
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #46 on: March 20, 2012, 04:26:05 pm »
All of these are attempts to get talent on the field.  Did you really expect them to pay $11M to Clint Barmes?  Wallace has talent, why not try to get him in the lineup?  Cust was nothing more than a flyer, and I'll be shocked if they keep him.

Sorry, but I feel like you're seeing patterns where there are none.

I thought Barmes was about 5 mil per year.  You may be right that there is no trend; it just looks pretty evident to me.  

Besides, even though it is not the way I see baseball, I'm not really knocking his approach.  He may be right afterall.  I hope he is.  

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #47 on: March 20, 2012, 04:29:38 pm »
I agree with this if we are just isolating this move, but overall, his moves scream "offense first."  Cust, Lowrie, Wallace at third?, jettisoning Q and Bourgeois.  None seem to even a pay a glancing nod to defense.  Maybe it is the future, or the AL.

No it doesn't scream "offense first".  It screams "we need to get better". 
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #48 on: March 20, 2012, 04:50:19 pm »
Luhnow said the PTBNL is the key component of the trade.  Let's hope Q and Bourgeois get lots of time and play well.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #49 on: March 20, 2012, 04:50:52 pm »
Luhnow said the PTBNL is the key component of the trade

Peyton?
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #50 on: March 20, 2012, 04:51:12 pm »
Luhnow said the PTBNL is the key component of the trade. 

Sounds to me like we should be reviewing their 2011 draft to see candidates for the PTBNL.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #51 on: March 20, 2012, 04:51:31 pm »
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #52 on: March 20, 2012, 05:10:49 pm »
Levine just tweeted that with the trade, the Astros have only six players 30 and over on the 40 man roster.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #53 on: March 20, 2012, 05:11:55 pm »
Levine just tweeted that with the trade, the Astros have only six players 30 and over on the 40 man roster.

That's 6 too many.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #54 on: March 20, 2012, 05:27:32 pm »
That's 6 too many.

We're trying to field a ball club, not staff a plane. 
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #55 on: March 20, 2012, 07:07:05 pm »
Did you really expect them to pay $11M to Clint Barmes? 

Not to mention that but by letting Barmes go the Astros received the #41 pick overall in this years draft. 
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #56 on: March 20, 2012, 08:30:20 pm »
Peyton?

Hell no, he can't shake anybody off anymore.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #57 on: March 20, 2012, 09:02:22 pm »
Not to mention that but by letting Barmes go the Astros received the #41 pick overall in this years draft. 

That's hard to believe.  And awesome.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #58 on: March 20, 2012, 09:02:52 pm »
Hell no, he can't shake anybody off anymore.

So nobody else was expecting him to walk to the podium in Denver and bark out an audible to Nashville?
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Ebby Calvin

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3595
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #59 on: March 20, 2012, 09:46:43 pm »
We're trying to field a ball club, not staff a plane. 

Bravo.
Don't think twice, it's alright.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #60 on: March 21, 2012, 11:37:58 am »
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #61 on: March 21, 2012, 12:26:47 pm »
I like the move, but in the grand scheme for the club, it won't matter that much.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

NeilT

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 11670
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #62 on: March 21, 2012, 01:06:12 pm »
I like the move, but in the grand scheme for the club, it won't matter that much.

You say that now, but Luhnow already has a scheme to trade Chapman to the Red Sox for the next Bagwell.
"I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing... as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”  Charles Grassley

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #63 on: March 21, 2012, 01:11:05 pm »
You say that now, but Luhnow already has a scheme to trade Chapman to the Red Sox for the next Bagwell.

I like how you think, Neil. But I hope that Chapman is as big a character as Larry Andersen is. That'd be fun.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #64 on: March 21, 2012, 01:16:56 pm »
All part of the Luhnow plan. See 5th paragraph from bottom. (sorry, don't know how to pull that out and post it). http://www.stltoday.com/sports/baseball/professional/luhnow-starting-from-scratch-with-astros/article_4d23c5fc-8652-55b9-8a2f-bbde4e04dac2.html

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #65 on: March 21, 2012, 01:21:52 pm »
I like the move, but in the grand scheme for the club, it won't matter that much.

Maybe too early to judge this deal. http://kansascity.royals.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20120320&content_id=27440120&notebook_id=27440130&vkey=notebook_kc&c_id=kc

And right below is the annual red herring report on Paulino.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #66 on: March 21, 2012, 01:30:50 pm »
All part of the Luhnow plan. See 5th paragraph from bottom. (sorry, don't know how to pull that out and post it). http://www.stltoday.com/sports/baseball/professional/luhnow-starting-from-scratch-with-astros/article_4d23c5fc-8652-55b9-8a2f-bbde4e04dac2.html

Bottom paragraphs 5 and 6, for context:

"On Tuesday, Luhnow traded two potential starters from his lineup, catcher Humberto Quintero and outfielder Jason Bourgeois, to Kansas City for minor-league lefty Kevin Chapman and a player to be named."

"We're trying to take a farm system that by many third-party views is in the bottom five of baseball and turn into a top-five system," Luhnow said. "Part of doing that is acquiring prospects any way you can. We have to deal from areas where we have depth. And we're going to do it again, too."


Goin' for a bus ride.

Ty in Tampa

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 9111
  • You just gotta keep livin' man, L-I-V-I-N
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #67 on: March 21, 2012, 01:36:47 pm »

"We're trying to take a farm system that by many third-party views is in the bottom five of baseball and turn into a top-five system," Luhnow said. Part of doing that is acquiring prospects any way you can."


Another part is continuing to suck for the foreseeable future.
"You want me broken. You want me dead.
I'm living rent-free in the back of your head."

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #68 on: March 21, 2012, 01:56:56 pm »
Another part is continuing to suck for the foreseeable future.

This is the part that most interests me:

"We have to deal from areas where we have depth. And we're going to do it again, too."

Where do they have depth enough to deal for prospects worth a damn?  Other than chunky first basemen of course.
Goin' for a bus ride.

OregonStrosFan

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12328
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #69 on: March 21, 2012, 02:02:32 pm »
Where do they have depth enough to deal for prospects worth a damn?  Other than chunky first basemen of course.

I think your referring to 'width', not 'depth'.  Don't worry, I get those two confused myself sometimes...
In the end, my dissolution with the game of baseball will not be a result of any loss of love for the game, rather from the realization that I can no longer bear the anger its supposed stewards cause to be built up in my soul. -Lee (01/08/2013)

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #70 on: March 21, 2012, 02:04:37 pm »
Where do they have depth enough to deal for prospects worth a damn?  Other than chunky first basemen of course.

Bingo.

They're waiting for a team to need a DH/1b, and then (I'm guessing) Luhnow has sold Crane on eating Lee's contract to deal him.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #71 on: March 21, 2012, 02:08:29 pm »
They're waiting for a team to need a DH/1b, and then (I'm guessing) Luhnow has sold Crane on eating Lee's contract to deal him.

If he can convince Crane of that, I could see them actually getting something interesting in return.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

roadrunner

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2164
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #72 on: March 21, 2012, 02:11:52 pm »
This is the part that most interests me:

"We have to deal from areas where we have depth. And we're going to do it again, too."

Where do they have depth enough to deal for prospects worth a damn?  Other than chunky first basemen of course.

Well it did seem crowded at AAAA/MLB backup level outfielders and catchers.  Turning that into 2 prospects doesn't seem like a bad move.

Phil_in_CS

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1511
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #73 on: March 22, 2012, 07:17:17 am »
Another part is continuing to suck for the foreseeable future.

It won't ever get better until they admit where they are and start to deal with the situation. Working the farm system is the right place to start.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #74 on: March 22, 2012, 09:07:06 am »
It won't ever get better until they admit where they are and start to deal with the situation.

You don't think they've done that already?
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Ebby Calvin

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3595
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #75 on: March 22, 2012, 09:44:11 am »
You don't think they've done that already?

Are you kidding?  We're just one player away!
Don't think twice, it's alright.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #76 on: March 22, 2012, 09:47:52 am »
 a lot of insinuation from Footer and others on twitter that the PTBNL is a) a pitcher and b) the centerpiece of the deal and "will become obvious" why he's not named yet.  So, does that mean a recent draftee? 

Ebby Calvin

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3595
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #77 on: March 22, 2012, 09:55:33 am »
I think they have to wait til June or something before they can include a player from the 2011 draft in a trade.  I read that somewhere, I swear.  Would make sense why he would be a PTBNL.
Don't think twice, it's alright.

jbm

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6615
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #78 on: March 22, 2012, 10:00:50 am »
I hope it is someone promising, but realistically, why would it be?  Unless KC is really stupid (and I assume they are not), it would be surprising for them to give up bigtime potential for two players like Q and Bourgeois.  Most likely, this is a trade where the Royals gain some ready-to-play average players, and the Astros obtain some possible future players with slightly above average potential. 

Ty in Tampa

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 9111
  • You just gotta keep livin' man, L-I-V-I-N
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #79 on: March 22, 2012, 10:03:52 am »
It won't ever get better until they admit where they are and start to deal with the situation. Working the farm system is the right place to start.

My point, while sounding like (and being) a jab, is that continuing to suck is a way to build the farm system.
"You want me broken. You want me dead.
I'm living rent-free in the back of your head."

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #80 on: March 22, 2012, 10:07:42 am »
a lot of insinuation from Footer and others on twitter that the PTBNL is a) a pitcher and b) the centerpiece of the deal and "will become obvious" why he's not named yet.  So, does that mean a recent draftee? 

John Lamb is who I'm watching.  A previous top 10 prospect who had TJ surgery last summer.  Appears to be a little ahead of recovery schedule.  If he gets all the way back he's a possible middle of the rotation LHP.
Goin' for a bus ride.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #81 on: March 22, 2012, 10:43:45 am »
a lot of insinuation from Footer and others on twitter that the PTBNL is a) a pitcher and b) the centerpiece of the deal and "will become obvious" why he's not named yet.  So, does that mean a recent draftee? 

Haven't seen the pitcher insinuations.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #82 on: March 22, 2012, 10:52:01 am »
Haven't seen the pitcher insinuations.

That's interesting.  I just looked back through her tweets from last night, and the reference didn't appear in her timeline.  Given the timing of the tweet, the information/speculation may have come from Astroline. 

roadrunner

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2164
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #83 on: March 22, 2012, 11:25:12 am »
I'm sure it's Bubba Starling.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #84 on: March 22, 2012, 11:28:04 am »
My point, while sounding like (and being) a jab, is that continuing to suck is a way to build the farm system.

Yeah, that's what cracks me up when people say "We should build our team like the Rays..."  Step 1 of that process: suck for 10 years so you can get a bunch of high draft picks.
Grab another Coke and let's die

Ebby Calvin

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3595
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #85 on: March 22, 2012, 01:40:21 pm »
@jluhnow:
Just watched Kevin Chapman pitch his first two innings as an Astro. Impressive. 90-93, threw strikes, 2k, 4 gb outs. Hard 81 slider.
Don't think twice, it's alright.

BlownRanger

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 661
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #86 on: March 22, 2012, 04:39:39 pm »
Who is this fucking guy?

Per Ted Berg on Twitter: Jason Bourgeois has been dealt for a Crate and Barrel catalog and a Thomas Kinkade painting to be named later.

I saw Chapman throw at Florida against LSU. He's raw but has talent. And he's a lefty.

When trying to endear yourself to your cohorts in the twittersphere, trashing the Astros is never a bad move.
"He hit that one right up the poop chute, Bill" - Enos Cabell

jester9450

  • Roster Filler
  • Posts: 166
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #87 on: March 23, 2012, 04:28:21 pm »
This team has no speed now.

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #88 on: March 23, 2012, 04:47:58 pm »
This team has no speed now.

Yeah, Boojwah's wheels are the only reason they won 56.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

jester9450

  • Roster Filler
  • Posts: 166
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #89 on: March 23, 2012, 05:39:24 pm »
Yeah, Boojwah's wheels are the only reason they won 56.

No crappy play helped was but his speed helped the team currently has only 1 player with more than 10 stolen bases in the majors.

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #90 on: March 23, 2012, 06:00:38 pm »
No crappy play helped was but his speed helped the team currently has only 1 player with more than 10 stolen bases in the majors.

If you're making a case for missing speed, wrap it around the loss of Bourn. Overall team speed has probably increased slightly from youth replacing older players, but it doesn't mean much if you don't get on base.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

drew corleone

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2458
    • View Profile
    • http://2centmovies.blogspot.com
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #91 on: March 23, 2012, 07:03:06 pm »
Can't steal first.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #92 on: March 23, 2012, 09:43:49 pm »
No crappy play helped was but his speed helped the team currently has only 1 player with more than 10 stolen bases in the majors.

Do these kids have more than 10 games in the majors?
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #93 on: March 23, 2012, 09:47:01 pm »
Do these kids have more than 10 games in the majors?

That guy who has more than ten steals does.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

Col. Sphinx Drummond

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16760
  • art is a bulwark against the irrationality of man
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #94 on: March 23, 2012, 09:53:52 pm »
You can't motherfucking coach speed. Man.
Everyone's talking, few of them know
The rest are pretending, they put on a show
And if there's a message I guess this is it
Truth isn't easy, the easy part's shit

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #95 on: March 23, 2012, 11:02:43 pm »
You can't motherfucking coach speed. Man.

Our old track coach, the late great Boots Garland, would disagree with you. He made a lot of people at LSU much faster than they were.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #96 on: March 24, 2012, 08:35:53 am »
That guy who has more than ten steals does.

Carlos Lee IS team speed!
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #97 on: March 24, 2012, 09:52:40 am »
Altuve, Bogusevic, Martinez all are faster or better baserunners than the guy who played their position last year. I haven't seen him run since the knee surgery but I'm guessing Castro is still faster than Q. And Schafer, if he doesn't quite have Bourn speed is pretty close. Lowrie vs. Barmes, dunno, Johnson vs. ...Johnson is a wash, Lee vs. Wallace, um...

So overall maybe they're not a Fast Team, but they're probably overall faster than what they started with last season, and they could have 3 guys steal 20+ bases, so there's that.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #98 on: March 24, 2012, 09:57:32 am »
Realistically, steals don't mean much. Team speed, speed on the base paths, range in the outfield, this does mean something although smart base running to me is more important than just good wheels in a straight line.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #99 on: March 24, 2012, 10:10:27 am »
Realistically, steals don't mean much. Team speed, speed on the base paths, range in the outfield, this does mean something although smart base running to me is more important than just good wheels in a straight line.
Agreed. See Pants, Thunder.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #100 on: March 24, 2012, 10:11:36 am »
Agreed. See Pants, Thunder.

Elvis, Fat.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #101 on: March 24, 2012, 10:23:33 am »
I'm not saying Luhnow is a Beane clone but Beane eschewed the steal as a part of the game. Not to say his managers don't use it but it is not an integral part of the game. The Cards of the last few years weren't that quick of foot either.

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #102 on: March 24, 2012, 10:41:28 am »
It's all about scoring more runs per outs than the other guy. If the team has a guy who successfully steals 75% of the time, I'm sure he'd be a big part of the scheme but you go with what you've got, not try to make what you've got go the way you want.

Not sure that is very articulate. Me not know.
« Last Edit: March 24, 2012, 11:01:30 am by Ron Brand »
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #103 on: March 24, 2012, 11:45:57 am »
Realistically, steals don't mean much. Team speed, speed on the base paths, range in the outfield, this does mean something although smart base running to me is more important than just good wheels in a straight line.

+1
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

jester9450

  • Roster Filler
  • Posts: 166
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #104 on: March 24, 2012, 11:10:57 pm »
Guys all i'm saying is we're going to need someone to come off the bench that can get around the paths .

jester9450

  • Roster Filler
  • Posts: 166
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #105 on: March 27, 2012, 12:56:50 am »
That guy who has more than ten steals does.
You know thats there is know one on this team that has more.

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #106 on: March 27, 2012, 03:23:01 am »
You know thats there is know one on this team that has more.

I'm not sure what you mean here, but I'll put my chips on the table:

Steals don't mean shit, unless the frequency and success are far beyond league average. The correlation between steals and wins is very low.

Jason Bourgeois stole bases at a better than league average rate in 2011. For the 31 bases he stole over 93 games, he only scored 30 runs.

Jason Bourgeois was a little better than a replacement level OF in 2011. Right-handed pitching killed him - .219 / .241 / .255.

He had a good first half - .353 / .371 / .422, and a bad second half - .250 / .287 / .309. and he had 11 more starts and 42 more plate appearances in that second half.

The important thing for an offense is to score runs. You accomplish that by getting on base and being driven in to home. Very few players steal enough bases to make a significant positive effect in that equation. Bourgeois stole bases at an 84% success rate in 2011, which is above average and in the realm of positivity, yet his overall contribution to runs scored was minor.

Team speed is important. Overall team speed is likely better in 2012 than it was in 2011.

Getting on base is most important of all. That's the key you should focus on here, not something flashy but meaningless like stolen bases.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

S.P. Rodriguez

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2932
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #107 on: March 27, 2012, 07:18:11 am »
I'm not sure what you mean here, but I'll put my chips on the table:

Steals don't mean shit, unless the frequency and success are far beyond league average. The correlation between steals and wins is very low.

Jason Bourgeois stole bases at a better than league average rate in 2011. For the 31 bases he stole over 93 games, he only scored 30 runs.

Jason Bourgeois was a little better than a replacement level OF in 2011. Right-handed pitching killed him - .219 / .241 / .255.

He had a good first half - .353 / .371 / .422, and a bad second half - .250 / .287 / .309. and he had 11 more starts and 42 more plate appearances in that second half.

The important thing for an offense is to score runs. You accomplish that by getting on base and being driven in to home. Very few players steal enough bases to make a significant positive effect in that equation. Bourgeois stole bases at an 84% success rate in 2011, which is above average and in the realm of positivity, yet his overall contribution to runs scored was minor.

Team speed is important. Overall team speed is likely better in 2012 than it was in 2011.

Getting on base is most important of all. That's the key you should focus on here, not something flashy but meaningless like stolen bases.

In short, it's great to be fast but if you don't get on base enough to use said speed, it doesn't mean jack. 

Is that a fair assessment?
"If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed."

"If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you; that is the principal difference between a dog and a man. "

-Mark Twain

jbm

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6615
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #108 on: March 27, 2012, 07:51:32 am »
The important thing for an offense is to score runs. You accomplish that by getting on base and being driven in to home. Very few players steal enough bases to make a significant positive effect in that equation. Bourgeois stole bases at an 84% success rate in 2011, which is above average and in the realm of positivity, yet his overall contribution to runs scored was minor.

Team speed is important. Overall team speed is likely better in 2012 than it was in 2011.

Getting on base is most important of all. That's the key you should focus on here, not something flashy but meaningless like stolen bases.

It's not about stolen bases in my mind, it is about taking the extra base, beating out a DP, getting to that batted ball, etc.  This team is slow.  Saying that they are faster than last year is cold comfort.

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #109 on: March 27, 2012, 08:14:48 am »
It's not about stolen bases in my mind, it is about taking the extra base, beating out a DP, getting to that batted ball, etc.  This team is slow.  Saying that they are faster than last year is cold comfort.

Cold comfort? It shouldn't be any comfort at all, because the difference is minimal. If this team can get guys on base, it'll be more successful. It's as simple as that.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #110 on: March 27, 2012, 08:23:38 am »
In short, it's great to be fast but if you don't get on base enough to use said speed, it doesn't mean jack. 

Is that a fair assessment?

Partly, but more that it takes a team to win. One fast guy doesn't mean a lot unless he's Rickey Henderson or a similar player whose tide carries all boats. That's not Boojwah, and the Astros need a flood of talent.

It should be telling to casual observers that Astro regulars are spare parts to other teams.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #111 on: March 27, 2012, 08:48:43 am »
Partly, but more that it takes a team to win. One fast guy doesn't mean a lot unless he's Rickey Henderson or a similar player whose tide carries all boats. That's not Boojwah, and the Astros need a flood of talent.

It should be telling to casual observers that Astro regulars are spare parts to other teams.
Who are you referring to? I don't think Boojwah or Q were Astro regulars, even though Q played more than any catcher last year. He was certainly a spare part at the time of the trade.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

S.P. Rodriguez

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2932
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #112 on: March 27, 2012, 08:55:45 am »
Partly, but more that it takes a team to win. One fast guy doesn't mean a lot unless he's Rickey Henderson or a similar player whose tide carries all boats. That's not Boojwah, and the Astros need a flood of talent.

It should be telling to casual observers that Astro regulars are spare parts to other teams.

As much as I liked Bourgois and Bourn, neither is anywhere near the player Henderson was, even later in his career.  Hell, they aren't even close to Biggio.  The beauty in Henderson's game was that he wasn't just fast and very effective at stealing bases, he also drew walks, hit for power, and carried a solid average.  As a leadoff hitters pitchers had to pitch around him or give up what was likely going to be a double.  He would then create havoc on the basepaths like few others could.  Think Craig Biggio in his prime, only much much better.  That is not a knock on Biggio, by any means.    Bourn was a nice player, very fun to watch in Centerfield.  Bourgois was a 4th/5th OF on a good team. 
"If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed."

"If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you; that is the principal difference between a dog and a man. "

-Mark Twain

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #113 on: March 27, 2012, 08:56:57 am »
The beauty in Henderson's game was that he wasn't just fast and very effective at stealing bases, he also drew walks, hit for power, and carried a solid average.  As a leadoff hitters pitchers had to pitch around him or give up what was likely going to be a double.  He would then create havoc on the basepaths like few others could.  Think Craig Biggio in his prime, only much much better. 

Bill James said it best: You could have split Rickey Henderson into two players and both would have been Hall of Famers.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #114 on: March 27, 2012, 09:07:52 am »
Who are you referring to? I don't think Boojwah or Q were Astro regulars, even though Q played more than any catcher last year. He was certainly a spare part at the time of the trade.

Yeah, last year was an anomaly so maybe I was wrong in calling them regulars, at least in 2012. Boojwah was the regular in LF before his injury if I recall correctly and Q had 90-odd games at catcher. I'd be very surprised if either of them got that kind of usage in KC this year.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #115 on: March 27, 2012, 10:34:08 am »
Team speed, for chrissake, you get fucking goddam little fleas on the fucking bases getting picked off trying to steal, getting thrown out, taking runs away from you. Get them big cocksuckers who can hit the fucking ball out the ballpark and you can't make any goddam mistakes.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #116 on: March 27, 2012, 10:53:13 am »
Team speed, for chrissake, you get fucking goddam little fleas on the fucking bases getting picked off trying to steal, getting thrown out, taking runs away from you. Get them big cocksuckers who can hit the fucking ball out the ballpark and you can't make any goddam mistakes.

Earl, is that you?
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #117 on: March 27, 2012, 11:19:20 am »
Team speed, for chrissake, you get fucking goddam little fleas on the fucking bases getting picked off trying to steal, getting thrown out, taking runs away from you. Get them big cocksuckers who can hit the fucking ball out the ballpark and you can't make any goddam mistakes.

And you said that you had lost interest!
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #118 on: March 27, 2012, 11:43:11 am »
I know that the Astros are flushing 50 years of history, but have you lot really forgotten, already, "Rapid" Roger Cedeno and Glenn "Feets Don't Fail Me Now" Barker?

Speed is probably the only tool that requires at least one other tool to make it usable.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

EasTexAstro

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5748
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #119 on: March 27, 2012, 11:51:18 am »
Glenn "Feets Don't Fail Me Now" Barker?

first person i thought of
It's my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of 'em was one kinda sombitch or another.

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #120 on: March 27, 2012, 11:52:08 am »
I know that the Astros are flushing 50 years of history, but have you lot really forgotten, already, "Rapid" Roger Cedeno and Glenn "Feets Don't Fail Me Now" Barker?

Speed is probably the only tool that requires at least one other tool to make it usable.

Violating the spirit, but there aren't enough opportunities to mention Joe "Shoes" Pittman.
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #121 on: March 27, 2012, 12:03:31 pm »
Glenn "Feets Don't Fail Me Now" Barker?

Great nickname, or greatest nickname?
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #122 on: March 27, 2012, 04:03:22 pm »
Chuckie Carr doesn't like the tone of this thread.

Regards,
Chuckie Carr
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

Col. Sphinx Drummond

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16760
  • art is a bulwark against the irrationality of man
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #123 on: March 27, 2012, 06:43:11 pm »
Eric Yelding was successful 64 out of 89 attempts in 1990.
Everyone's talking, few of them know
The rest are pretending, they put on a show
And if there's a message I guess this is it
Truth isn't easy, the easy part's shit

Ron Brand

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 22329
  • Smoke 'em inside.
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #124 on: March 27, 2012, 07:04:15 pm »
Eric Yelding was successful 64 out of 89 attempts in 1990.

Despite that, Jim Clancy was 2-8. WTF?
I'm in love with rock and roll and I'll be out all night.

subnuclear

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6116
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #125 on: March 28, 2012, 07:45:15 am »
Eric Yelding was successful 64 out of 89 attempts in 1990.

I started watching baseball regularly that year because I liked to see Eric Yielding try and steal.

drew corleone

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2458
    • View Profile
    • http://2centmovies.blogspot.com
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #126 on: March 28, 2012, 09:47:35 am »
Chuckie Carr doesn't like the tone of this thread.

Regards,
Chuckie Carr

Chuckie's hacking on 2-0.

OregonStrosFan

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12328
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #127 on: June 27, 2012, 10:13:31 am »
MLBTR says both are gone, but destination not yet known.

MLBTR is saying something akin to this again... (which is a shame, as I like Q a lot, and like Bourgeois as well)

06/27/12: Royals Designate Humberto Quintero for Assignment (Bourgeois was DFA'd a month or two ago).
In the end, my dissolution with the game of baseball will not be a result of any loss of love for the game, rather from the realization that I can no longer bear the anger its supposed stewards cause to be built up in my soul. -Lee (01/08/2013)

geezerdonk

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3342
  • a long tradition of existence
    • View Profile
Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #128 on: June 27, 2012, 10:18:28 am »
Pick him up.
E come vivo? Vivo.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #129 on: June 27, 2012, 11:35:36 am »
MLBTR is saying something akin to this again... (which is a shame, as I like Q a lot, and like Bourgeois as well)

06/27/12: Royals Designate Humberto Quintero for Assignment (Bourgeois was DFA'd a month or two ago).

Bourgeois got called up today.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #130 on: June 27, 2012, 12:52:35 pm »
Bourgeois got called up today.
Yeah, looks like Q DFA'd to make room for Boojwah (who's not having anywhere close to the success he had last year).
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Bourgeois transaction?
« Reply #131 on: June 27, 2012, 01:33:18 pm »
Yeah, looks like Q DFA'd to make room for Boojwah (who's not having anywhere close to the success he had last year).

That's ironic.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius