Author Topic: f'ing texans  (Read 274066 times)

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1500 on: October 19, 2010, 09:30:52 am »
What is the difference between "kick" and "defer"?

After the coin toss, the winning team gets one of two choices to start the game:  

1.  kick/receive the ball, or
2.  which goal they want to defend.  

The team that loses the toss gets the other choice.  To start the second half, the choices are reversed, ie, the team that lost the coin flip gets to pick first, and the winning team gets the other choice.  Deferring simply means that the team that wins the toss defers making the first choice until the second half.  That means that the team that lost the flip gets first choice to start the game.

If you win the toss, and elect to kick, that means by default that the losing teams gets the ball first to start the game, plus they get to pick which end they want to defend.  The team that loses the toss still gets first choice to start the second half.  There is no rationale for choosing to kick.
« Last Edit: October 19, 2010, 09:33:38 am by HudsonHawk »
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1501 on: October 19, 2010, 09:49:49 am »
After the coin toss, the winning team gets one of two choices to start the game:  

1.  kick/receive the ball, or
2.  which goal they want to defend.  

The team that loses the toss gets the other choice.  To start the second half, the choices are reversed, ie, the team that lost the coin flip gets to pick first, and the winning team gets the other choice.  Deferring simply means that the team that wins the toss defers making the first choice until the second half.  That means that the team that lost the flip gets first choice to start the game.

If you win the toss, and elect to kick, that means by default that the losing teams gets the ball first to start the game, plus they get to pick which end they want to defend.  The team that loses the toss still gets first choice to start the second half.  There is no rationale for choosing to kick.

And Ryans should know this.  I think he just misspoke, that is why the ref asked him three times.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1502 on: October 19, 2010, 09:54:23 am »
And Ryans should know this.  I think he just misspoke, that is why the ref asked him three times.

Right.  99 times out of 100 you say "defer" and what actually happens is that you kick.  It's not rocket surgery on either end.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1503 on: October 19, 2010, 09:59:09 am »
And Ryans should know this.  I think he just misspoke, that is why the ref asked him three times.

I'd like to think that, but from Schaub's comments, it made it sound like Ryans was more concerned with going on defense to start the game.  Obviously that is the result of deferring, but it sure was unconfortable to hear.  At any rate, the point is, there was confusion over what was going to be called, which should never happen.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1504 on: October 19, 2010, 10:19:43 am »
I'd like to think that, but from Schaub's comments, it made it sound like Ryans was more concerned with going on defense to start the game.  Obviously that is the result of deferring, but it sure was unconfortable to hear.  At any rate, the point is, there was confusion over what was going to be called, which should never happen.

Right it shouldn’t, but not HC's fault.  Ryans calls/called the defensive plays, so one would assume that he can get the flip call right.  Also not his first time out there since he is/was a captain.

I would not be surprised if some officials have heard 'kick' called and just assumed that the team was deferring.  According to alot of Chiefs fans these officials were incompetent anyways. 

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1505 on: October 19, 2010, 10:40:26 am »
Right it shouldn’t, but not HC's fault.  Ryans calls/called the defensive plays, so one would assume that he can get the flip call right.  Also not his first time out there since he is/was a captain.

It may not be the coach's fault, but it is his problem.  If he can't even get that message out there, what does that say about his communication skills?

Quote
I would not be surprised if some officials have heard 'kick' called and just assumed that the team was deferring.  According to alot of Chiefs fans these officials were incompetent anyways. 

The Chiefs got the benefit of nearly every call except the pass interference on Johnson late in the game.  That's what they're sore about.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1506 on: October 19, 2010, 10:50:57 am »
The Chiefs got the benefit of nearly every call except the pass interference on Johnson late in the game.  That's what they're sore about.
Yep.

And those are grown men whom have played football their whole life.  This is not Little League.  If Kubs told them to kick, Ryans should know what to call.
« Last Edit: October 19, 2010, 10:52:31 am by Astroholic »

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1507 on: October 19, 2010, 10:53:11 am »


The Chiefs got the benefit of nearly every call except the pass interference on Johnson late in the game.  That's what they're sore about.

And, if there had been no flag thrown either way and the Texans had just lined up for the next play, there wouldn't be any fuss about it at all.  It wasn't severe enough of a pushoff to warrant a flag in the 4th quarter of an NFL game.  Randy Moss pushes off more to get separation on nearly every single ball thrown his way.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1508 on: October 19, 2010, 10:56:22 am »
And, if there had been no flag thrown either way and the Texans had just lined up for the next play, there wouldn't be any fuss about it at all.  It wasn't severe enough of a pushoff to warrant a flag in the 4th quarter of an NFL game.  Randy Moss pushes off more to get separation on nearly every single ball thrown his way.

There was no penalty as it was.  And Chiefs' fans are still pissed.  And they should be.  It was a huge pushoff.  Johnson clearly got separation with it.  It was as obvious an offensive interference as you'll ever see.  Were I a Chiefs fan, I'd be pissed too. 
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1509 on: October 19, 2010, 11:00:06 am »
There was no penalty as it was.  And Chiefs' fans are still pissed.  And they should be.  It was a huge pushoff.  Johnson clearly got separation with it.  It was as obvious an offensive interference as you'll ever see.  Were I a Chiefs fan, I'd be pissed too.  

I did not see it that way.  I will admit to being a homer, but I have seen that kind of bumping on almost every fly route in the NFL over the past several years.  I know that the defensive players have been hamstrung by the rules, but this is the way it is and has been called.


I would have pissed if it would have went the other way.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1510 on: October 19, 2010, 11:18:33 am »
I did not see it that way.  I will admit to being a homer, but I have seen that kind of bumping on almost every fly route in the NFL over the past several years.  I know that the defensive players have been hamstrung by the rules, but this is the way it is and has been called.


I would have pissed if it would have went the other way.

yes, you are a homer.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1511 on: October 19, 2010, 11:30:50 am »
I did not see it that way.  I will admit to being a homer, but I have seen that kind of bumping on almost every fly route in the NFL over the past several years.  I know that the defensive players have been hamstrung by the rules, but this is the way it is and has been called.


I would have pissed if it would have went the other way.

Seems to me that a common sense way to fix the pass interference rule would be to make the penalty more like the roughing the kicker/running into the kicker thing.  Basically, there should be a delineation between blatant pass interference, like the defender knows he's beat and deliberately grabs or pushes the receiver, and incidental interference, like when there's bumping between the defender and receiver while both are going for the ball.  Blatant interference should be enforced the same as now, but all other kinds should just be 10 yards and a first down or something like that.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1512 on: October 19, 2010, 11:34:05 am »
Seems to me that a common sense way to fix the pass interference rule would be to make the penalty more like the roughing the kicker/running into the kicker thing.  Basically, there should be a delineation between blatant pass interference, like the defender knows he's beat and deliberately grabs or pushes the receiver, and incidental interference, like when there's bumping between the defender and receiver while both are going for the ball.  Blatant interference should be enforced the same as now, but all other kinds should just be 10 yards and a first down or something like that.

Isn't this the college rule?  Except that the referees almost never call the "blatant" version.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

EasTexAstro

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5748
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1513 on: October 19, 2010, 11:39:27 am »
Isn't this the college rule?  Except that the referees almost never call the "blatant" version.

i thought they had the illegal contact 5-yd. penalty, and then the pass interference, spot of the foul 1st down choice.
It's my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of 'em was one kinda sombitch or another.

ybbodeus

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3041
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1514 on: October 19, 2010, 12:10:20 pm »
What happened 2 years ago is irrelevant.
Correct, even if it happens again.
"(512) ybbodeus looks just as creepy in HD as in person."   That is a problem, and we are working on it.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1515 on: October 19, 2010, 12:18:48 pm »
Seems to me that a common sense way to fix the pass interference rule would be to make the penalty more like the roughing the kicker/running into the kicker thing.  Basically, there should be a delineation between blatant pass interference, like the defender knows he's beat and deliberately grabs or pushes the receiver, and incidental interference, like when there's bumping between the defender and receiver while both are going for the ball.  Blatant interference should be enforced the same as now, but all other kinds should just be 10 yards and a first down or something like that.

There is no penalty for incidental contact when both are going for the ball, only when the defender is not.  That's why they talk about the defender turning his head around and looking for the ball.  It basically renders the contact non-interference.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1516 on: October 19, 2010, 12:20:54 pm »
i thought they had the illegal contact 5-yd. penalty, and then the pass interference, spot of the foul 1st down choice.

Illegal contact and pass interfence are two different infractions.  Illegal contact is independent of a pass actually being thrown.  Pass interference requires the ball to be thrown and in the air when the contact occurs.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1517 on: October 19, 2010, 12:28:42 pm »
There is no penalty for incidental contact when both are going for the ball, only when the defender is not.  That's why they talk about the defender turning his head around and looking for the ball.  It basically renders the contact non-interference.

Yeah but as we all know the defender often gets called for interference if there's incidental contact when both are going for the ball.  And the defender seemingly always gets called if he's defending well but is unable to look around at the ball (like if there's an underthrown pass, and the receiver hits into the trailing db while coming back for the ball).  At worst that's obstruction or something minor, but certainly not blatant interference that would call for a 40 or 50 yard penalty or whatever.

As is, many receivers seem to be coached (or have learned) to use alligator arms to push off knowing that the rule is so skewed in favor of receivers, that the penalty is so huge that DB's would often rather not risk anything that could be interpreted as interference, and that the worst that could happen is a 10 yard penalty for offensive interference which makes zero difference if it's third down or late in a game.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1518 on: October 19, 2010, 12:36:39 pm »
Yeah but as we all know the defender often gets called for interference if there's incidental contact when both are going for the ball.

That rarely, if ever, happens.

Quote
  And the defender seemingly always gets called if he's defending well but is unable to look around at the ball (like if there's an underthrown pass, and the receiver hits into the trailing db while coming back for the ball).  At worst that's obstruction or something minor, but certainly not blatant interference that would call for a 40 or 50 yard penalty or whatever.

There is no such thing as "blantant interference".  Either the defender impeded the receiver or he didn't.  The defenders intentions don't enter into it.

The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1519 on: October 19, 2010, 12:55:23 pm »
The defenders intentions don't enter into it.



But since this is all up to referee and his interpretation of the play without benefit of instant slo mo HD replay, the call usually goes in the recievers favor.

« Last Edit: October 19, 2010, 01:00:45 pm by Astroholic »

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1520 on: October 19, 2010, 12:58:22 pm »
But since this is all up to referee and his interpretation of the play without benefit of instant slo mo HD replay, the call usually goes in the recievers favor.

The rules, and the enforcement of them, are usually tilted in the receivers' favor, yes.  We NFL fans sort of demand that.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1521 on: October 19, 2010, 01:01:29 pm »
Another topic that we can discuss.  Should helmet to helmet contact result in suspension?  Does it have to be called in the game?  League review after game?  This is an interesting topic to me because this type of head hunting is taught at the little league level by some 'coaches'.  I removed my kid from this until he grows and is taught how to play by paid coaches (Intermediate school).  For reference, I played MIC in highschool.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1522 on: October 19, 2010, 01:11:17 pm »

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1523 on: October 19, 2010, 01:25:00 pm »
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1524 on: October 19, 2010, 02:31:29 pm »
That rarely, if ever, happens.

It happens all the time, such as in the Texans-Chiefs game.

There is no such thing as "blantant interference".  Either the defender impeded the receiver or he didn't.  The defenders intentions don't enter into it.


There's a defender interfering with the receiver in such an obvious way that the defender had no realistic chance to defend the pass and a catch would have almost certainly happened otherwise.  This is "blatant" or whatever you want to call it.  Then there's two guys going up for the ball and the defender bumps the receiver, or the defender happens to be blocking the path of the receiver to the ball but not grabbing, pushing, or intentionally standing in his path.  Stuff like this is not blatant or flagrant or whatever, and are difficult for the defender to avoid much less do intentionally.  It's ridiculous that both could be 50 yard penalties.

Duke

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1247
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1525 on: October 19, 2010, 02:50:11 pm »
About Fucking Time!
-Lurch, DeSean Jackson FF Owner

That shit that Harrison pulled Sunday deserves suspension.  He's going to end up killing somebody if they don't do something. He admitted yesterday that he is trying to hurt receivers who come in his zone.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1526 on: October 19, 2010, 03:02:08 pm »
Illegal contact and pass interfence are two different infractions.  Illegal contact is independent of a pass actually being thrown.  Pass interference requires the ball to be thrown and in the air when the contact occurs.

[Nitpick] ...and be catchable. [/Nitpick]
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1527 on: October 19, 2010, 03:38:46 pm »
[Nitpick] ...and be catchable. [/Nitpick]

I've never understood the caveat about the ball being tipped negating PI.  If it was still catchable, and the player tackles you to prevent you from catching it, thats PI in my book.
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1528 on: October 19, 2010, 03:44:39 pm »
It happens all the time, such as in the Texans-Chiefs game.

I certainly didn't see it in the Chiefs game.  I don't think I've seen it yet this season in any game.

Quote
Then there's two guys going up for the ball and the defender bumps the receiver, or the defender happens to be blocking the path of the receiver to the ball but not grabbing, pushing, or intentionally standing in his path.  Stuff like this is not blatant or flagrant or whatever, and are difficult for the defender to avoid much less do intentionally.  It's ridiculous that both could be 50 yard penalties.

That is not a penalty.  The defensive player has just as much right to try to catch the ball as the offensive player.  You never see this called pass interference. 
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1529 on: October 19, 2010, 03:50:50 pm »
I've never understood the caveat about the ball being tipped negating PI.  If it was still catchable, and the player tackles you to prevent you from catching it, thats PI in my book.

Because pass interfernce is about timing.  Once a forward pass is touched by a player other than the QB, the timing of the play has been altered.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1530 on: October 20, 2010, 02:56:44 pm »
Schaub is Offensive Player of the Week.  Meanwhile, players think Romo is second most overrated.

And.... Go!
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1531 on: October 20, 2010, 04:02:45 pm »
Meanwhile, players think Romo is second most overrated.

And.... Go!

Is that just Dallas' players?
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1532 on: October 20, 2010, 04:28:02 pm »
Is that just Dallas' players?

Nope.  TO was first
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1533 on: October 20, 2010, 05:27:53 pm »
Nope.  TO was first

He's asking if the poll was taken solely among Dallas players. Of course, TO's being first doesn't really answer his question.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1534 on: October 20, 2010, 05:37:00 pm »
Actually, I was just being sarcastic.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Andyzipp

  • Guest
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1535 on: October 21, 2010, 08:08:15 am »
http://kilt.cbslocal.com/2010/10/19/whiner-line-tuesday/

The call at about 2:55 is pretty damn accurate.

JaneDoe

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 8603
  • Missing in Action
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1536 on: October 21, 2010, 09:01:19 am »
http://kilt.cbslocal.com/2010/10/19/whiner-line-tuesday/

The call at about 2:55 is pretty damn accurate.

Goodness gracious, that was funny.
"My hammy is a little tight. I wish I was like Ausmus. He's Jewish and isn't allowed to have a pulled hamstring."

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1537 on: October 21, 2010, 09:05:50 am »
http://kilt.cbslocal.com/2010/10/19/whiner-line-tuesday/

The call at about 2:55 is pretty damn accurate.

"...where Frank Bush will... make a sandwich." The entire thing is hilarious.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Andyzipp

  • Guest
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1538 on: October 21, 2010, 10:46:57 am »
"...where Frank Bush will... make a sandwich." The entire thing is hilarious.

Kareem Jackson falls down.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1539 on: October 21, 2010, 10:57:29 am »
"...where Frank Bush will... make a sandwich." The entire thing is hilarious.

"The Drano Classic Milkshake... for when slow, agonizing death is preferable to watching the Texans play defense."
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1540 on: October 21, 2010, 10:59:43 am »
"Any Random Guy surveys the defense, mostly as a courtesy..."
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1541 on: October 21, 2010, 01:18:41 pm »
I watched the Kansas City game again last night and was absolutely appalled at how bad the defense is/was. The time when Demeco was on the field was equally as bad if not worse. I couldn't count the number of times an interior DL made a tackle 8 yards beyond the line of scrimmage. How is that even possible? The LBs were AWOL as was Mario. I will say that the corners were not as miserable as they have been. They made a couple of plays, even. They've progressed from Historically Bad to Simply Terrible. In time perhaps they'll elevate themselves to Cheerfully Inept.

Unless something dramatic happens the Colts will score 50 points on the Texans. And hell, who knows, as bad as the Colts are against the run maybe the Texans will stay in the game.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1542 on: October 21, 2010, 01:38:57 pm »
In time perhaps they'll elevate themselves to Cheerfully Inept.

"Mostly Harmless"
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1543 on: October 21, 2010, 02:10:51 pm »
I watched the Kansas City game again last night and was absolutely appalled at how bad the defense is/was. The time when Demeco was on the field was equally as bad if not worse. I couldn't count the number of times an interior DL made a tackle 8 yards beyond the line of scrimmage. How is that even possible? The LBs were AWOL as was Mario. I will say that the corners were not as miserable as they have been. They made a couple of plays, even. They've progressed from Historically Bad to Simply Terrible. In time perhaps they'll elevate themselves to Cheerfully Inept.

Unless something dramatic happens the Colts will score 50 points on the Texans. And hell, who knows, as bad as the Colts are against the run maybe the Texans will stay in the game.

Demeco has been getting praise from day 1.  I think he is okay, but pro bowler..nah.  Diles has more speed that meco, so we shall see what happens.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1544 on: October 21, 2010, 02:14:13 pm »
Unless something dramatic happens the Colts will score 50 points on the Texans. And hell, who knows, as bad as the Colts are against the run maybe the Texans will stay in the game.

Collie and Clark are both out for several weeks (which is just great, since Collie is one of the top guys on my FFL team). So that's a little ray of sunshine for the Texans.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1545 on: October 21, 2010, 02:16:03 pm »
So that's a little ray of sunshine for the Texans.

Arian Foster and Duane Brown are the Texans' rays of hope for this next game.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1546 on: October 21, 2010, 02:27:39 pm »
I watched the Kansas City game again last night and was absolutely appalled at how bad the defense is/was. The time when Demeco was on the field was equally as bad if not worse. I couldn't count the number of times an interior DL made a tackle 8 yards beyond the line of scrimmage. How is that even possible? The LBs were AWOL as was Mario. I will say that the corners were not as miserable as they have been. They made a couple of plays, even. They've progressed from Historically Bad to Simply Terrible. In time perhaps they'll elevate themselves to Cheerfully Inept.

Unless something dramatic happens the Colts will score 50 points on the Texans. And hell, who knows, as bad as the Colts are against the run maybe the Texans will stay in the game.

don't know if you saw this, yesterday, but it's a pretty interesting breakdown of how poor the lb's are at understanding their coverage responsibilities in the cover 2 scheme:  http://www.texansbullblog.com/crisis-secondary-start-cornerbacks/featured-articles/film-study/

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1547 on: October 21, 2010, 06:54:22 pm »
don't know if you saw this, yesterday, but it's a pretty interesting breakdown of how poor the lb's are at understanding their coverage responsibilities in the cover 2 scheme:  http://www.texansbullblog.com/crisis-secondary-start-cornerbacks/featured-articles/film-study/

I did see that, thanks. I like what they do over there even if the guy in charge annoys me from time to time.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

JaneDoe

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 8603
  • Missing in Action
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1548 on: October 21, 2010, 09:38:18 pm »
Collie and Clark are both out for several weeks (which is just great, since Collie is one of the top guys on my FFL team). So that's a little ray of sunshine for the Texans.

And Clark is on mine.....
"My hammy is a little tight. I wish I was like Ausmus. He's Jewish and isn't allowed to have a pulled hamstring."

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1549 on: October 22, 2010, 12:06:41 pm »
And Clark is on mine.....

Clark is apparently officially out for the year now.  If there was ever a year where the Colts miss the playoffs this is it.  Texans need to stop fucking around real fast.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1550 on: October 22, 2010, 12:50:28 pm »
Clark is apparently officially out for the year now.  If there was ever a year where the Colts miss the playoffs this is it.  Texans need to stop fucking around real fast.

Peyton could throw for 400 on the Texans with a krewe of circus midgets as his wide receivers.  Remember before last year all the pundits wondered "how is manning putting up these numbers with Austin Collie and Pierre Garcon," and now people act like these guys matter.  They don't, all that matters is Payton.  Sure, Clark seems to be his indespensable safety valve, but we probably only think that because he hasn't been replaced by Joe Dick yet at TE.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1551 on: October 22, 2010, 01:30:57 pm »
Sure, Clark seems to be his indespensable safety valve, but we probably only think that because he hasn't been replaced by Joe Dick Barely Capable Receiver yet at TE.

FIFY.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1552 on: October 22, 2010, 04:40:22 pm »
FIFY.

I'll be starting Barely Capable Receiver next week.
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1553 on: October 22, 2010, 04:56:01 pm »
I'll be starting Barely Capable Receiver next week.

Bravo, sir.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1554 on: October 22, 2010, 07:50:18 pm »
Peyton could throw for 400 on the Texans with a krewe of circus midgets as his wide receivers.  Remember before last year all the pundits wondered "how is manning putting up these numbers with Austin Collie and Pierre Garcon," and now people act like these guys matter.  They don't, all that matters is Payton.  Sure, Clark seems to be his indespensable safety valve, but we probably only think that because he hasn't been replaced by Joe Dick yet at TE.

Dallas Clark is way more than a safety valve for them.  He lines up as a slot receiver on the majority of downs, not as a TE, and has averaged over 10 ypc every year he's been in the league.  A glance at his stats shows that Manning has become increasingly reliant on him, as his catches have gone up by 20/year since 2006, culminating in 100 for 1100 yards last year (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/C/ClarDa00.htm), a pace he was close to this year as well.  I think you're gonna see a lot more forced balls to Reggie Wayne from here on out.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1555 on: October 22, 2010, 07:51:56 pm »
I think you're gonna see a lot more forced balls to Reggie Wayne from here on out.

I hope so: he's mine too.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1556 on: October 22, 2010, 08:09:57 pm »
The problem with garcon is that he's not reliable - kind of a rich man's Jacoby Jones. Losing the possesion guys will really hurt them I think.
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1557 on: October 22, 2010, 08:14:28 pm »
I think you're gonna see a lot more forced balls to Reggie Wayne from here on out.

Does it count as "forced" if he's open by 5 yards because Kareem Jackson is defending him a week from Monday?

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1558 on: October 22, 2010, 10:18:40 pm »
Does it count as "forced" if he's open by 5 yards because Kareem Jackson is defending him a week from Monday?

the only thing "forced" on that day will be what peyton manning will be figuratively doing to the texans defensive players.

Lefty

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3539
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1559 on: October 23, 2010, 08:48:16 am »
the only thing "forced" on that day will be what peyton manning will be figuratively doing to the texans defensive players.

Not really "forced" at all, they just sorta lay there and take it.

[/clayton williams]
You may ask yourself, "How do I work this?"

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1560 on: October 25, 2010, 01:26:30 pm »
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1561 on: October 25, 2010, 01:35:17 pm »
Meanwhile, Jerry Jones has flown in all of the rescued Chilean miners to Dallas for tonight's game.  Apparently, they have expert knowledge in how to dig themselves out of a deep hole before Christmas.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1562 on: October 25, 2010, 06:36:08 pm »
Meanwhile, Jerry Jones has flown in all of the rescued Chilean miners to Dallas for tonight's game.  Apparently, they have expert knowledge in how to dig themselves out of a deep hole before Christmas.

Oh I figured it was because they too have multiple girlfriends at the end of the tunnel expecting a piece of the payout.

OregonStrosFan

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12328
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1563 on: October 26, 2010, 09:32:48 am »
Meanwhile, Jerry Jones has flown in all of the rescued Chilean miners to Dallas for tonight's game.  Apparently, they have expert knowledge in how to dig themselves out of a deep hole before Christmas.

And it gets worse for JJ.  Romo out 6-8 weeks with a broken clavicle...
In the end, my dissolution with the game of baseball will not be a result of any loss of love for the game, rather from the realization that I can no longer bear the anger its supposed stewards cause to be built up in my soul. -Lee (01/08/2013)

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1564 on: October 26, 2010, 09:37:53 am »
And it gets worse for JJ.  Romo out 6-8 weeks with a broken clavicle...

When the Cowboys finish 2-14 or so, the Texans will look back and say that their loss to the Cowboys was what kept them out of the playoffs.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1565 on: October 26, 2010, 09:44:33 am »
When the Cowboys finish 2-14 or so, the Texans will look back and say that their loss to the Cowboys was what kept them out of the playoffs.

Was anyone else more than a little miffed that the two teams shitting all over their TV screens last night were the two teams who have beaten the Texans this year?

How crap are you to turn the ball over 4 times in 2 quarters?  And how crap are you when you get gifted 4 turnovers in 2 quarters, and are still down by 4 at the half?  Fuck me sideways.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1566 on: October 26, 2010, 09:51:57 am »
Thank god the Cowboys have such superior talent or things might get really fucking ugly.
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1567 on: October 26, 2010, 09:59:21 am »
Thank god the Cowboys have such superior talent or things might get really fucking ugly.

Cowboy "fan" in the office told me this morning that the Cowboys have "too much talent" to be this bad and that they win last night's game if Romo doesn't get hurt*.  If anyone wants proof as to how the media can brainwash the uninformed, there it is.


* Actually, this may have been true, but not for the reasons my Cowboy fan colleague thinks.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1568 on: October 26, 2010, 10:04:32 am »
They were already throwing away the game before he got hurt - the Giants had tried to give the game and they were still down; the Giants weren't going to keep turning it over because Romo was in there.
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1569 on: October 26, 2010, 10:26:01 am »
They were already throwing away the game before he got hurt - the Giants had tried to give the game and they were still down; the Giants weren't going to keep turning it over because Romo was in there.

Exactly.  But Romo - for all his overhype - is better than Kitna (who isn't?).  It's not a foregone conclusion that the Giants win without Romo's injury (which was down to his line sucking, not bad luck).  But, yes, they 'Girls were shit before the injury, so the whole "too much talent" meme is just masturbation.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1570 on: October 26, 2010, 10:31:57 am »
Thank god the Cowboys have such superior talent or things might get really fucking ugly.

And the talking heads are still splooging all over themselves about the thought of the Cowboys playing in the Super Bowl in Dallas.  They're still yammering on about how they're only two games out of the wild card...about how 10 wins is still a good season, as if them winning out is a given. 
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1571 on: October 26, 2010, 10:33:20 am »
Cowboy "fan" in the office told me this morning that the Cowboys have "too much talent" to be this bad and that they win last night's game if Romo doesn't get hurt*.

Cowboy fan is a moron if he thinks they have more than 6-win talent.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1572 on: October 26, 2010, 10:36:52 am »
And the talking heads are still splooging all over themselves about the thought of the Cowboys playing in the Super Bowl in Dallas.  They're still yammering on about how they're only two games out of the wild card...about how 10 wins is still a good season, as if them winning out is a given. 

HA!  Fucking farce.  They win 9 or 10 games max with Romo (this was my pre-season prediction, coaching not good enough to do anything more).  They win 4 or 5 now.  With the sucktitude that is the OL, they need to go ahead and put in McGee, would hate to see Kitna get himself killed this close to retirement.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1573 on: October 26, 2010, 10:39:41 am »
HA!  Fucking farce.  They win 9 or 10 games max with Romo (this was my pre-season prediction, coaching not good enough to do anything more).  They win 4 or 5 now.  With the sucktitude that is the OL, they need to go ahead and put in McGee, would hate to see Kitna get himself killed this close to retirement.

They were on pace to win about 3 or 4 *with* Romo.  They might have won 6 or 8.  How anyone thinks they could have won 10 games is beyond me.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1574 on: October 26, 2010, 10:45:06 am »
They were on pace to win about 3 or 4 *with* Romo.  They might have won 6 or 8.  How anyone thinks they could have won 10 games is beyond me.


Just like I dont think the Texans win 5 of there last 10, missing the playoffs.  Only way is if there is a dramatic change in the d, and I just don't see it.  In the back of my mind if this gets Kubs fired, well then its not a total loss.  Just not sure the owner will fire him.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1575 on: October 26, 2010, 10:46:39 am »
In the back of my mind if this gets Kubs fired, well then its not a total loss.  Just not sure the owner will fire him.

McNair has kept Kubiak around this long.  Obviously winning doesn't enter into the equation.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1576 on: October 26, 2010, 10:47:50 am »
McNair has kept Kubiak around this long.  Obviously winning doesn't enter into the equation.

I think at the end of the day, we can all be damn proud of 8-8. 
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1577 on: October 26, 2010, 10:48:44 am »
I think at the end of the day, we can all be damn proud of 8-8. 

Well, coaching a 10-11 win team to 8 victories *does* take a special skill...
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1578 on: October 26, 2010, 10:49:22 am »
I think at the end of the day, we can all be damn proud of 8-8. 
Why?  Mediokra is not a goal.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1579 on: October 26, 2010, 10:58:20 am »
Cowboy fan is a moron if he thinks they have more than 6-win talent.

FIFY
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1580 on: October 26, 2010, 11:00:27 am »
FIFY

thanks for letting me know. i have been a Cowboys fan since the team entered the league.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1581 on: October 26, 2010, 11:03:21 am »
thanks for letting me know. i have been a Cowboys fan since the team entered the league.

I was referring specifically to my colleague, who is a classic, dictionary definition moron.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1582 on: October 26, 2010, 11:04:07 am »
I was referring specifically to my colleague, who is a classic, dictionary definition moron.

Right.  "Cowboy Fan"...with a capital "F".  It's a proper noun.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1583 on: October 26, 2010, 11:54:28 am »
And the talking heads are still splooging all over themselves about the thought of the Cowboys playing in the Super Bowl in Dallas.  They're still yammering on about how they're only two games out of the wild card...about how 10 wins is still a good season, as if them winning out is a given. 

That fucking idiot McClain had a piece the other day saying that the 1-4 Cowboys were not out of it yet because The Oilers once went 1-4 and by dinghies they finished 12-4!

I think John McClain may be the biggest dumbass in the entire sports section and that is quite an achievement.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1584 on: October 26, 2010, 12:04:43 pm »
That fucking idiot McClain had a piece the other day saying that the 1-4 Cowboys were not out of it yet because The Oilers once went 1-4 and by dinghies they finished 12-4!

I think John McClain may be the biggest dumbass in the entire sports section and that is quite an achievement.

I quit listening to that yahoo on the radio after so long of hearing him having to catch his breath twice just saying "Julius Peppers".
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1585 on: October 26, 2010, 12:06:33 pm »
That fucking idiot McClain had a piece the other day saying that the 1-4 Cowboys were not out of it yet because The Oilers once went 1-4 and by dinghies they finished 12-4!

I think John McClain may be the biggest dumbass in the entire sports section and that is quite an achievement.

With Lopez no longer around you might be right.  Still got Dick Justice though. 


I almost forgot about the King.  And Jesus is still there also, though relegated to soccer.
« Last Edit: October 26, 2010, 12:08:32 pm by Astroholic »

GreatBagwellsBeard

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2990
  • The damn paterfamilias
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1586 on: October 26, 2010, 12:08:40 pm »
I think John McClain may be the biggest dumbass in the entire sports section and that is quite an achievement.

Pancakes McClain is a joke.  It blows my mind when people speak reverentially about him.  Good ol boy schtick, dirty old man looks at Anna-Megan, and a glandular disorder do not a beat reporter make.
Drinking for two.

“I want to paint a mural of Houston for the kids, but I’m terrible at drawing swamp humidity"

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1587 on: October 26, 2010, 12:38:11 pm »
I was referring specifically to my colleague, who is a classic, dictionary definition moron.

You should have been specific about who you were referring.  I assume you were calling me a moron also.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1588 on: October 26, 2010, 01:36:09 pm »
With Lopez no longer around you might be right.  Still got Dick Justice though. 

I almost forgot about the King.  And Jesus is still there also, though relegated to soccer.

Dick Justice is paid to masturbate in public and that's what he does. It's designed to piss people like us off, I mean, obviously. And he's a fucking Rhodes Scholar compared to McClain.

Solomon does not appear to be an idiot. I can't say he's compelling reading but he's not an idiot. Jesus is most definitely an idiot but I'd like to think he's working hard with what little he has.

McClain on the other hand is stupid AND lazy. He used to cover the NFL at large and would swan around to the choice games every week.  The Chronicle finally got fed up with that and put his ass on the Texans beat and he's been pouting ever since. He's covered the NFL for fucking thirty years and he knows everybody so you'd think that his writing would occasionally be informative and insightful and draw from his rolodex. But instead we get paint by numbers bullshit week after week.

I occasionally write him to remind him that he is stupid and lazy and the typical response I get is, Chuck, I work seven days a week for six months out of the year and I write three stories a week and five blogs a week... Actually, here it is direct from the horse's mouth:

"Here's what I do: I will not take a day off until after the Super Bowl. I write stories, columns, blogs, read and post comments, and now I tweet like crazy. I also do seven weekly talk shows in Houston, Nashville, Waco, Austin and Knoxville. They help promote Chron.com as well as supplement my income.
 
When news breaks, I almost always get the story first. That's something my bosses like the most. And it can be documented by the time stamp placed on our stories on Chron.com. We break nothing in the Chronicle anymore, all on Chron.com."

'I almost always get the story first.' That's awesome. He is invariably scooped by the national media. He "broke" the Cushing starts at Mike story insofar as he showed up at the training facility and attended a briefing where the team made an announcement and he dutifully reported it.

Jeffrey Martin is giving me some signs of hope though, I will say that.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

JaneDoe

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 8603
  • Missing in Action
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1589 on: October 26, 2010, 03:00:32 pm »
Jeffery Martin?


ETA: I know he writes for the Chron, but he is not listed as one of their columnists, so I wasn't sure if he was a permanent fixture.
« Last Edit: October 26, 2010, 03:03:40 pm by JaneDoe »
"My hammy is a little tight. I wish I was like Ausmus. He's Jewish and isn't allowed to have a pulled hamstring."

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1590 on: October 26, 2010, 03:20:21 pm »
I quit listening to that yahoo on the radio after so long of hearing him having to catch his breath twice just saying "Julius Peppers".

Listening to his slavering monotone on the radio just fills my head with images of Jabba the Hut.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

ybbodeus

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3041
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1591 on: October 26, 2010, 04:26:33 pm »
Not far off, Limey.  Shoot, Baylor honored him at the halftime of a game a year or two ago, perhaps in an effort to get him to stop bashing his alma mater on the radio every chance he got.  He was upset when Baylor fired Kevin Steele, as were most of the coaches in the Big 12 at that time.
« Last Edit: October 26, 2010, 05:34:47 pm by ybbodeus »
"(512) ybbodeus looks just as creepy in HD as in person."   That is a problem, and we are working on it.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1592 on: October 26, 2010, 06:37:49 pm »
Jeffery Martin?


ETA: I know he writes for the Chron, but he is not listed as one of their columnists, so I wasn't sure if he was a permanent fixture.

He's written a lot of pieces on the Texans this year. Somehow he manages to talk directly to players and coaches and assemble quotes that enhance the story in a relevant way. These quotes are gathered at the behest of the reporter and not just scribbled down (incorrectly) from a press conference. His writing level also surpasses the sixth grade. At the end of the day it's really quite something to behold.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1593 on: November 01, 2010, 07:42:41 pm »
"Matt Schaub:  MVP of the pro bowl"

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1594 on: November 01, 2010, 07:55:21 pm »
Hey Kubiak:

If you're running the ball and the other team can't stop it, you're allowed to keep running the ball.  Seriously.  It's okay.  You don't have to change just because they're expecting it.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1595 on: November 01, 2010, 08:04:34 pm »
The Texans get the ball twice and don't do shit. The Colts expose the worst pass defense in the history of the NFL on their second possession. This does not bode well.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1596 on: November 01, 2010, 08:11:59 pm »
I'll be starting Barely Capable Receiver next week.

...that was quick
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1597 on: November 01, 2010, 08:13:54 pm »
Who is calling these plays? What a crock of shit.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1598 on: November 01, 2010, 08:13:57 pm »


3rd and 2:  flat pass incomplete

4th and 2:  schaub in the shotgun, slant incomplete

hey, maybe they should have tried something else.  not sure what.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1599 on: November 01, 2010, 08:17:50 pm »
Boy, that was a horrible spot.

I wonder what my life would be like if the Texans had a pass rush of any kind whatsoever. It would be better, I am sure of that.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1600 on: November 01, 2010, 08:21:25 pm »
Anderson is quick... that was a very nice sack
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1601 on: November 01, 2010, 08:22:46 pm »

Colts playcalling always confounds me when they actually run set plays and not Manning calling the plays at the line.  I know you strive for some balance, but seems like just giving Manning 3 cracks at the Texans secondary would be a much better move than flare outs to the third string running back.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1602 on: November 01, 2010, 08:25:25 pm »
Run the fucking ball. Is it really that hard an idea to comprehend?
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1603 on: November 01, 2010, 08:25:31 pm »
Fire
Kubiak
Now
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1604 on: November 01, 2010, 08:26:23 pm »
For a minute there I had no idea why JJ didn't field that punt.

Then I remembered that I was watching the Texans, not the Longhorns.

Then Matt Schaub gave the other team seven more points when the Colts can't stop the running game and now I'm feeling comfortable again.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1605 on: November 01, 2010, 08:27:40 pm »
Then I remembered that I was watching the Texans, not the Longhorns.

They really are starting to run together
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1606 on: November 01, 2010, 08:29:40 pm »
Just run every play until your turn it over on downs
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1607 on: November 01, 2010, 08:30:00 pm »
They really are starting to run throw short useless passes together

FIFY
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1608 on: November 01, 2010, 08:30:05 pm »
For a minute there I had no idea why JJ didn't field that punt.

Then I remembered that I was watching the Texans, not the Longhorns.

Then Matt Schaub gave the other team seven more points when the Colts can't stop the running game and now I'm feeling comfortable again.

Most frustrating thing is that Colts look pretty weak tonight with all their injuries.  Texans could win this game going away with a gameplan that had shoeprint-free dicks.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2010, 08:33:24 pm by Joey Trum »

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1609 on: November 01, 2010, 08:31:17 pm »

RUN THE BALL GODDAMMIT!!!  RUN THE BALL RUN THE BALL RUN THE BALL!!!!

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1610 on: November 01, 2010, 08:32:26 pm »
These morans are going to get Schaub killed.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1611 on: November 01, 2010, 08:34:06 pm »
These morans are going to get Schaub killed.

Caldwell did an impressive job of touching nobody.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1612 on: November 01, 2010, 08:40:45 pm »
Please, take all sharp objects away from me now.  I'm about to go all Prince Rilian in the Silver Chair...
Grab another Coke and let's die

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1613 on: November 01, 2010, 08:41:13 pm »
Pollard sucks and Smith has no discipline. I know why their previous teams had no interest in their services.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1614 on: November 01, 2010, 08:44:01 pm »
I am hanging onto the believe that they can't play much worse.  The only problem is that the Colts aren't exactly firing on all cylinders, and they're up by 11. 
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1615 on: November 01, 2010, 08:44:44 pm »
Pollard sucks and Smith has no discipline. I know why their previous teams had no interest in their services.

Pollard sucks.
Pollard is the best safety the Texans have ever had.
Both are true.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1616 on: November 01, 2010, 08:44:45 pm »
Pollard sucks and Smith has no discipline. I know why their previous teams had no interest in their services.

Smith has played really good this year-- Cards wanted him back but Texans outbid them.  Bull blog noted that he has to anticipate the snap count in order to be an effective pass rusher, which is why he leads the team in offsides penalties.  They argued that it was an effective tradeoff.

Pollard would be really good if he could play closer to the line, but he can't because they Texans can't cover.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1617 on: November 01, 2010, 08:45:20 pm »
And Renterria just made it 3-0 Giants.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1618 on: November 01, 2010, 08:51:00 pm »
Every time I flip over to the Texans the Colts have the ball.  I guess I'm not missing much.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1619 on: November 01, 2010, 08:56:21 pm »
Good defense by the Texans that still results in first down Colts. 

There is no doubt in my mind the Colts will score a touchdown this drive.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1620 on: November 01, 2010, 09:01:38 pm »
D is just guessing
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1621 on: November 01, 2010, 09:03:18 pm »
Pollard sucks.
Pollard is the best safety the Texans have ever had.
Both are true.

Marcus Coleman was the best safety the Texans ever had. I look back on that expansion draft in absolute wonder that Casserly could have accomplished such perfection. Of course, then he turned around and fucked up the real draft. And I'm not talking about Carr, although he plainly fucked that up, too. His third round pick in the first year DID NOT MAKE THE TEAM.

Think about that for a while.

And yes, I know that Coleman was drafted and played mostly as a CB.

There goes Smith again. I don't care who says what, if you give the other team's offense fifteen or twenty yards a game you need to fucking stop it. Especially if you're the one calling players only meetings.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1622 on: November 01, 2010, 09:03:37 pm »
Watching Peyton is only slightly annoying than playing against him in Madden while he hops around yelling and you have to sit around waiting for him to snap the fucking ball.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1623 on: November 01, 2010, 09:03:56 pm »
Why the fuck do you let 10 seconds run off if you are going to call a timeout?

Defense looks decent
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1624 on: November 01, 2010, 09:07:01 pm »
This shit is giving me Greg Davis flashbacks.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1625 on: November 01, 2010, 09:07:33 pm »
I just flipped back to see the final drive.  It's 4th and 4. 
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1626 on: November 01, 2010, 09:08:11 pm »
Well, the good news is the Texans defense only gave up 10 points.
Grab another Coke and let's die

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1627 on: November 01, 2010, 09:08:54 pm »
This shit is giving me Greg Davis flashbacks.

I think that even Davis would keep running Foster if he saw that he was averaging 8 yds/carry.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1628 on: November 01, 2010, 09:09:29 pm »
Well, the good news is the Texans defense only gave up 10 points.

Colts are not good today.  Manning has no receivers to throw to.  This game is so winnable it's not even funny.  Run the ball, don't make mistakes but they already fucked those two up

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1629 on: November 01, 2010, 09:11:11 pm »
I think that even Davis would keep running Foster if he saw that he was averaging 8 yds/carry.

Eight yards a carry? Is that good?
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1630 on: November 01, 2010, 09:28:17 pm »
Eight yards a carry? Is that good?

Not when you're looking at 3rd and 10 (again)
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1631 on: November 01, 2010, 09:29:46 pm »
This defense is a sick joke.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1632 on: November 01, 2010, 09:37:19 pm »
Well, lookie what happens when you run the ball a little.  Pity they waited until they were down 3 scores.
Grab another Coke and let's die

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1633 on: November 01, 2010, 09:37:56 pm »
Heh, I almost lost it that they were throwing...
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1634 on: November 01, 2010, 09:38:25 pm »
Well, lookie what happens when you run the ball a little.  Pity they waited until they were down 3 scores.

internet loudmouths 1, kubiak 0

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1635 on: November 01, 2010, 09:48:49 pm »
internet loudmouths 1, kubiak 0

Please, I prefer "Basement-Dwelling American."
Grab another Coke and let's die

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1636 on: November 01, 2010, 09:50:10 pm »
I gave up.  I cant watch this shit.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1637 on: November 01, 2010, 09:51:36 pm »
Please, I prefer "Basement-Dwelling American."

Porn Enthusiast

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1638 on: November 01, 2010, 09:54:27 pm »


FG is a major win for the D

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1639 on: November 01, 2010, 10:01:12 pm »
Grab another Coke and let's die

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1640 on: November 01, 2010, 10:07:04 pm »
Foster is a stud.  Really fantastic cuts
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1641 on: November 01, 2010, 10:07:15 pm »
Running game looked damn good there. 
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1642 on: November 01, 2010, 10:07:46 pm »
Seeing the Texans dominate now just makes me more angry.  How many gallons of gatorade did Kubiak drink before the game to be able to piss away an entire half?

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1643 on: November 01, 2010, 10:09:29 pm »
The sick thing is that the Texans need just two stops to win this game. That assumes they score on every possession, which they should have been doing all along.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1644 on: November 01, 2010, 10:09:44 pm »
Go for the surprise onside
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1645 on: November 01, 2010, 10:18:37 pm »
Longhorns offense vs Texans defense: who would be less inept?
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1646 on: November 01, 2010, 10:20:20 pm »
Mario benched??
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1647 on: November 01, 2010, 10:21:06 pm »
Longhorns offense vs Texans defense: who would be less inept?

Texans.  Gotta give Texans credit for at least trying new things, as desperate as they are.

Hey look, field goal!

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1648 on: November 01, 2010, 10:30:00 pm »
Pollard can't make the play. Ballgame.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1649 on: November 01, 2010, 10:32:54 pm »
It's not over yet!

Kubiak has 4 more minutes to screw things up some more.
Grab another Coke and let's die

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1650 on: November 01, 2010, 10:33:26 pm »
Jesucristo.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1651 on: November 01, 2010, 10:36:02 pm »
Fucking motherfucking einstein. 
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1652 on: November 01, 2010, 10:36:26 pm »
Jesucristo.

X100. Can't get personnel on the field?  Shit.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

T. J.

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1798
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1653 on: November 01, 2010, 10:37:21 pm »
Twentyfourfuckingseconds.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1654 on: November 01, 2010, 10:42:17 pm »
And it ends with a wet fart of a fumble.
Grab another Coke and let's die

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1655 on: November 01, 2010, 10:42:55 pm »
This game was honestly over when Schaub threw the pick 6.

I hate that Andre Johnson will waste his career here. So much respect for him.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1656 on: November 01, 2010, 10:45:23 pm »
And the number one reason Matt Schaub is not an elite QB in this league...

When the chips are down, instead of stepping up, he steps on his dick.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1657 on: November 01, 2010, 10:49:09 pm »
This game was honestly over when Schaub threw the pick 6.

I hate that Andre Johnson will waste his career here. So much respect for him.

Texans have been building their team to beat the Colts-- run the ball to keep Manning off the field, get good route-running receivers to beat the zone, bend but don't break defense to hold Manning to field goals and/or long drives.  The blueprint is obvious and effective, especially after the ass-kicking in the first game.  Colts could not stop Foster (7 ypc), yet he ends the game with just 15 carries.  Why get cute?

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1658 on: November 01, 2010, 10:49:19 pm »
And the number one reason Matt Schaub is not an elite QB in this league...

When the chips are down, instead of stepping up, he steps on his dick.

David Carr can't get on the field in fucking San Francisco. Even you have to admit that he blows at this point.

But I'm with you now that Schaub is not an elite QB. I'm not sure there are many elite QBs in the NFL now, but whoever they are, Schaub is not among them.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1659 on: November 01, 2010, 10:52:24 pm »
David Carr can't get on the field in fucking San Francisco. Even you have to admit that he blows at this point.

David Carr is irrelevant.  I don't give a shit what the 49's do.

Quote
But I'm with you now that Schaub is not an elite QB. I'm not sure there are many elite QBs in the NFL now, but whoever they are, Schaub is not among them.

Steve Young said it best in the pregame.  Putting up numbers against the scrubs doesn't make you elite.  If Schaub wants to be mentioned in the same paragraph as guys like Manning, Brady, Roethlisburger, etc, he has to sack up and carry his team to a win in a big games.  He's not shown that he can do that.  In fact, he's shown he can bumble them away from victory in big games.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

roadrunner

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2164
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1660 on: November 01, 2010, 11:02:17 pm »
I don't know if Cushing is doing things that don't show up on the stat sheet or I can't see on the tv, but he was pretty much nonexistent.  I know MLB isn't his position, but still....

Foster's a beast.  He made up for Schaub's awful 1st half. 

Why was Mario on the bench during the last drive?

Next week is pretty much must-win.  The schedule doesn't get any easier.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1661 on: November 01, 2010, 11:05:06 pm »
David Carr is irrelevant.  I don't give a shit what the 49's do.

Steve Young said it best in the pregame.  Putting up numbers against the scrubs doesn't make you elite.  If Schaub wants to be mentioned in the same paragraph as guys like Manning, Brady, Roethlisburger, etc, he has to sack up and carry his team to a win in a big games.  He's not shown that he can do that.  In fact, he's shown he can bumble them away from victory in big games.

This was the game of the year for the Texans. If they win they are effectively in the playoffs. If they lose, their season could spiral out of control. They lost, obviously, and they did not play well in any phase of the game. That tells me they are nowhere near a playoff team and that the organization is lost and has no direction. I knew this already, of course, it's just bracing to see what you know writ large on a Monday night.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1662 on: November 01, 2010, 11:07:39 pm »
I was over at a friend's place watching the game and tried to keep myself in check from not just bitching constantly about not continuously running the ball lest I be the guy that is the annoying broken record.  I hate that I came here after to read that you all were saying the same thing.  

Honestly, we're all internet jockeys - I keep thinking how are we possibly right?  Kubiak should be three steps ahead of us and thinking things that we're just not.  But he isn't.  He sucks.  I'm done with him...no matter how much I wanted to see him succeed as a hometown guy and aggie and etc, etc.  That's in addition to the typical shitty game management.  

roadrunner

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2164
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1663 on: November 01, 2010, 11:14:31 pm »
This was the game of the year for the Texans. If they win they are effectively in the playoffs. If they lose, their season could spiral out of control. They lost, obviously, and they did not play well in any phase of the game. That tells me they are nowhere near a playoff team and that the organization is lost and has no direction. I knew this already, of course, it's just bracing to see what you know writ large on a Monday night.

I see your point, but losing at Indy isn't a loss that signals a team "spiraling out of control".  When you looked at the schedule before the season started you wrote this game down as a loss for the Texans.  A win would've been huge, but the Texans have always been thought of as a 9-11 win team (hopefully) and these are the games a 9-11 win team loses.  When I say team, I include the coaching handicap that all the Kubiak haters love to bitch about.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1664 on: November 01, 2010, 11:26:41 pm »
I see your point, but losing at Indy isn't a loss that signals a team "spiraling out of control".  When you looked at the schedule before the season started you wrote this game down as a loss for the Texans.  A win would've been huge, but the Texans have always been thought of as a 9-11 win team (hopefully) and these are the games a 9-11 win team loses.  When I say team, I include the coaching handicap that all the Kubiak haters love to bitch about.

Why are you talking about what this game looked like before the season started rather than what this game looked like before the game started? This was an eminently winnable contest and the team fucked up in every phase of the game. We all know how fucked up the defense is but when you have Arian Foster running the ball well and Peyton Manning on the other side sitting there when you do run the ball you RUN THE MOTHERFUCKING BALL.

What did Foster have, like 15 carries? Hang on... Yes, 15. He gained over 100 yards. 8 carries in the first half, 7 in the second. Kubiak is a fucking moron and he will never win anything. He will certainly never lead a team to the playoffs. I mean, it is incredible that this guy gets paid, what, $3MM, $5MM? He's playing checkers when everyone else is playing chess. I'm fucking sick of it.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1665 on: November 01, 2010, 11:36:42 pm »
Why are you talking about what this game looked like before the season started rather than what this game looked like before the game started? This was an eminently winnable contest and the team fucked up in every phase of the game. We all know how fucked up the defense is but when you have Arian Foster running the ball well and Peyton Manning on the other side sitting there when you do run the ball you RUN THE MOTHERFUCKING BALL.

What did Foster have, like 15 carries? Hang on... Yes, 15. He gained over 100 yards. 8 carries in the first half, 7 in the second. Kubiak is a fucking moron and he will never win anything. He will certainly never lead a team to the playoffs. I mean, it is incredible that this guy gets paid, what, $3MM, $5MM? He's playing checkers when everyone else is playing chess. I'm fucking sick of it.

Imagine if this team actually somehow makes it to the playoffs.  Could be one of those games like the one that retired Jimmy Johnson and Dan Marino.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1666 on: November 01, 2010, 11:52:49 pm »
Imagine if this team actually somehow makes it to the playoffs.

They won't. And the league will have a lockout which will make most idiot fans forget the fact that there is an idiot coach who should be replaced.

And the idiot fans will side with the owners.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

DVauthrin

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1667 on: November 02, 2010, 01:57:56 am »
Why are you talking about what this game looked like before the season started rather than what this game looked like before the game started? This was an eminently winnable contest and the team fucked up in every phase of the game. We all know how fucked up the defense is but when you have Arian Foster running the ball well and Peyton Manning on the other side sitting there when you do run the ball you RUN THE MOTHERFUCKING BALL.

What did Foster have, like 15 carries? Hang on... Yes, 15. He gained over 100 yards. 8 carries in the first half, 7 in the second. Kubiak is a fucking moron and he will never win anything. He will certainly never lead a team to the playoffs. I mean, it is incredible that this guy gets paid, what, $3MM, $5MM? He's playing checkers when everyone else is playing chess. I'm fucking sick of it.

Agreed.    To think, I was happy they got the ball to start the game because I expected them to pound it down Indy's throat and get the crowd out of the game early.  Then, Kubiak comes out with wretched play-calling on the opening series.    Instead of pounding the ball to the guy that gashed Indy for over 200 yards in week one, he out thinks himself and comes out play action passing.     

After seeing Kubiak's esteemed mentor, Mike Shanahan,  bench Donovan McNabb for Rex freaking Grossman on a potential game winning drive, I think it's safe to say the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.   
Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1668 on: November 02, 2010, 06:24:50 am »
Why are you talking about what this game looked like before the season started rather than what this game looked like before the game started? This was an eminently winnable contest and the team fucked up in every phase of the game. We all know how fucked up the defense is but when you have Arian Foster running the ball well and Peyton Manning on the other side sitting there when you do run the ball you RUN THE MOTHERFUCKING BALL.

Amen!  This was a very winnable game.  And despite my expectations, the defense wasn't the culprit.  They gave up 20 points to the Colts on the road.  If you had told me that prior to the game, I'd have jumped all over it.  What doomed the Texans last night (besides Kubiak fucking up, which is what we call in the business world a "given") were the turnovers by Schaub.  You can't throw an interception at your own 20 yard line.  You can't fumble at your opponent's 10 yard line late in the 4th quarter.  Not if you want to win.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2010, 06:27:06 am by HudsonHawk »
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1669 on: November 02, 2010, 06:26:31 am »
I see your point, but losing at Indy isn't a loss that signals a team "spiraling out of control".  When you looked at the schedule before the season started you wrote this game down as a loss for the Texans.  A win would've been huge, but the Texans have always been thought of as a 9-11 win team (hopefully) and these are the games a 9-11 win team loses.  When I say team, I include the coaching handicap that all the Kubiak haters love to bitch about.

This is what losers tell themselves.  Who gives a shit about the schedule in August?  The Texans played one, and only one game, last night.  They had the means to win it.  They didn't.  Everything else is simply mom and apple pie bullshit.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

roadrunner

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2164
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1670 on: November 02, 2010, 07:03:05 am »
This is what losers tell themselves.  Who gives a shit about the schedule in August?  The Texans played one, and only one game, last night.  They had the means to win it.  They didn't.  Everything else is simply mom and apple pie bullshit.

Well this team has the means to win every game.  So do a lot of other teams in the league, but it's the NFL and there are only a few 12-14 win teams a year.  If you thought the Texans would be one of those this year, well then I think you had stretched expectations.  There are too many holes on this team, including playcalling and coaching.  I'm not making excuses or happy, but I'm not going to bitch and cry about a road loss at Indy.

I wanted 2-2 in the Giants - SD stretch, and that can still very easily happen.  The only thing that worries me is that I am counting on a win over the Jets, Baltimore, or Philly, and at this point I don't see that happening.

MikeyBoy

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2572
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1671 on: November 02, 2010, 07:34:13 am »
I don't know if Cushing is doing things that don't show up on the stat sheet or I can't see on the tv, but he was pretty much nonexistent.  I know MLB isn't his position, but still....

He's not, he's playing on his heels, scraping the LOS, getting swept out of plays and getting blocked one on one because he's catching the o-lineman. Instead he should be attacking downhill, filling gaps, attacking the block, shedding the block, etc. He missed some assignments and that can be exused at this point, but he is not playing with aggression and fire and hasn't since coming back.

Schaub is a good QB that can do a pretty good job of running an offense, but he absolutely can not make plays on his own and put a team on his back.

Mario, once again, disappeared. The rest of the D-line played decent minus Smith's undicsiplined play. Quinn made some nice plays supporting the run out of the nickel. Using Pollard in a cover two is beyond stupid, that's just not the type of safety he is. The collective tackling continues to be an issue, but overall with all of that, considering the three and outs by the offense and playing Peyton Manning on the road, 20 points should have been good enough to win the game.

Gary, RUN THE FUCKING BALL! You are turning out to be every bit of the idiot that Hudson has claimed. The decision to get cute and throw the ball against the best bookend d-ends in the NFL, with your LT coming off a four game suspension, crowd noise and one of the best running backs in the league is beyond inept.
"Buenos Dias, shitheads."

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1672 on: November 02, 2010, 09:09:59 am »
Agreed.    To think, I was happy they got the ball to start the game because I expected them to pound it down Indy's throat and get the crowd out of the game early.  Then, Kubiak comes out with wretched play-calling on the opening series.    Instead of pounding the ball to the guy that gashed Indy for over 200 yards in week one, he out thinks himself and comes out play action passing.

I was aghast to see two open bootlegs in the opening series...without ever having tried to run the ball.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1673 on: November 02, 2010, 09:10:58 am »
I was aghast to see two open bootlegs in the opening series...without ever having tried to run the ball.

I didn't have a problem with that... they were going to expect the run.

The problem was that Kubes never came back to the run to reset the expectation.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1674 on: November 02, 2010, 09:16:48 am »
3 and 2 2nd quarter.  Try a slant, good coverage incomplete.  4 and 2 incomplete pass.  Run the FUCKING ball!!!.  I turned the tv off after the first drive of the second half.  I really was getting so pissed that I could not watch any longer.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1675 on: November 02, 2010, 09:21:56 am »
3 and 2 2nd quarter.  Try a slant, good coverage incomplete.  4 and 2 incomplete pass.  Run the FUCKING ball!!!.  I turned the tv off after the first drive of the second half.  I really was getting so pissed that I could not watch any longer.

Yeah, luckily the WS was on.  I switched it over several times to calm myself down.  And I normally don't get pissed off about sports, but it was hard to watch them piss away such a winnable game.  8-8's tepid fingers are beckoning once more.
Grab another Coke and let's die

MikeyBoy

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2572
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1676 on: November 02, 2010, 09:22:29 am »
I was aghast to see two open bootlegs in the opening series...without ever having tried to run the ball.

The first bootleg to Andre was there too, no safety and the corner trailing by at least a yard, but Schaub didn't have the sac to make the throw, I guess. It was not an easy throw, but one a good NFL QB should make 8 out of 10 times.
"Buenos Dias, shitheads."

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1677 on: November 02, 2010, 09:24:29 am »
The first bootleg to Andre was there too, no safety and the corner trailing by at least a yard, but Schaub didn't have the sac to make the throw, I guess. It was not an easy throw, but one a good NFL QB should make 8 out of 10 times.

Ding fucking Ding.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1678 on: November 02, 2010, 09:42:42 am »
The first bootleg to Andre was there too, no safety and the corner trailing by at least a yard, but Schaub didn't have the sac to make the throw, I guess. It was not an easy throw, but one a good NFL QB should make 8 out of 10 times.

Schaub looked very Carr like last night.  After the first few hits he had happy feet.  Brown was horrible all night.  I would have given Butler a chance as he played well in Browns absence.  They play calling was horrible, but this has been covered on several occasions.  I thought the secondary (other than Pollard whom could not cover my dead grandmother RIP) looked better.  Cushing was horrible at MIKE.  Maybe he will get better.

A good game plan could have easily beat this depleted colts team.


** this is based on the first half of football.  I will assume that it works for the second half as well.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2010, 09:53:33 am by Astroholic »

Ebby Calvin

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3595
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1679 on: November 02, 2010, 10:39:08 am »
Schaub looked very Carr like last night.  

To some, that's a compliment.
Don't think twice, it's alright.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1680 on: November 02, 2010, 10:40:30 am »
To some, that's a compliment.
Not sure whom that is, but I really can't see how that could be interpreted as a complement.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1681 on: November 02, 2010, 10:43:17 am »
Schaub looked very Carr like last night.  After the first few hits he had happy feet.  Brown was horrible all night.  I would have given Butler a chance as he played well in Browns absence.  They play calling was horrible, but this has been covered on several occasions.  I thought the secondary (other than Pollard whom could not cover my dead grandmother RIP) looked better.  Cushing was horrible at MIKE.  Maybe he will get better.

A good game plan could have easily beat this depleted colts team.


** this is based on the first half of football.  I will assume that it works for the second half as well.


I don't blame Schaub for the happy feet.  As was noted by the esteemable Gruden & Jaworski, if Schaub's first option wasn't open it was pretty much clusterfuck time with the protection he was getting.  If his coach isn't going to run the ball to keep the d ends off balance then he can start pop and locking in the backfield and I won't blame him.

I've noticed with Cushing this year that teams seem to be exploiting his aggressiveness and tendency to stunt on his blitzes-- lots of cutbacks and play action to his spot on the field.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1682 on: November 02, 2010, 11:01:53 am »
I don't blame Schaub for the happy feet.  As was noted by the esteemable Gruden & Jaworski, if Schaub's first option wasn't open it was pretty much clusterfuck time with the protection he was getting.  If his coach isn't going to run the ball to keep the d ends off balance then he can start pop and locking in the backfield and I won't blame him.

I've noticed with Cushing this year that teams seem to be exploiting his aggressiveness and tendency to stunt on his blitzes-- lots of cutbacks and play action to his spot on the field.

I keyed on Cush several times during the game. He appeared lost.  Interesting d sets, as the Texans were in the nickle all night, so only two backers were on the field most of the time.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1683 on: November 02, 2010, 11:22:59 am »
so only two backers were on the field most of the time.

And one of those was Diles going whiff, whiff, whiff on attempted tackles.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1684 on: November 02, 2010, 11:39:00 am »
And one of those was Diles going whiff, whiff, whiff on attempted tackles.

Clay Matthews looks pretty good.  Might have picked the wrong SC boy.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1685 on: November 02, 2010, 11:57:00 am »
I didn't have a problem with that... they were going to expect the run.


This is where NFL coaches out-think themselves.  Who gives a fuck if they expect it?  They expected it in the second half of the first game they played and could not do dick about it.  They could not do dick about it yesterday.  I would have run the fucking ball down their throats until they proved to me (multiple downs in a row) that they could stop it.  Not like the game was getting out of hand scoring wise.  Early in the game there was NEVER any reason to NOT run the ball last night.  I knew somewhere HH was going nuts...

Outlawscotty

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 932
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1686 on: November 02, 2010, 12:07:17 pm »
I don't blame Schaub for the happy feet.  As was noted by the esteemable Gruden & Jaworski, if Schaub's first option wasn't open it was pretty much clusterfuck time with the protection he was getting.  If his coach isn't going to run the ball to keep the d ends off balance then he can start pop and locking in the backfield and I won't blame him.

I've noticed with Cushing this year that teams seem to be exploiting his aggressiveness and tendency to stunt on his blitzes-- lots of cutbacks and play action to his spot on the field.

Gruden also stated during the last series for the Texans that the defense was playing a 'Tampa 2' or something to that effect, and that nobody ran that anymore because a  'good' offensive coordinator could adjust on the fly and tear it to bits.

roadrunner

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2164
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1687 on: November 02, 2010, 12:11:22 pm »
Is it true that Schaub is not allowed to audible?

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1688 on: November 02, 2010, 12:56:03 pm »
Is it true that Schaub is not allowed to audible?

It appears that way.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1689 on: November 02, 2010, 01:09:15 pm »
Is it true that Schaub is not allowed to audible?

pretty sure schaub goes to the line with 2 plays out of the same formation, and is able to run the other play if it seems obvious that the first one won't work.  so it's not an audible in the way that peyton manning uses audibles to completely change the play and formation, but i know i've read that schaub does have a way to get out of an obvious disaster.

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1690 on: November 02, 2010, 01:12:21 pm »
Gruden also stated during the last series for the Texans that the defense was playing a 'Tampa 2' or something to that effect, and that nobody ran that anymore because a  'good' offensive coordinator could adjust on the fly and tear it to bits.

Actually, he or Young discussed that at length in the pre-game.  He mentioned that the Houston D was as vanilla as it gets, and that won't work in today's NFL.  That there is no gimmick makes it easy to plan for and he would love to line up against it.  
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1691 on: November 02, 2010, 01:23:30 pm »
Actually, he or Young discussed that at length in the pre-game.  He mentioned that the Houston D was as vanilla as it gets, and that won't work in today's NFL.  That there is no gimmick makes it easy to plan for and he would love to line up against it.  
I'm Hoping the Gruden changes all of that up next year when he replaces Kubiak.

MikeyBoy

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2572
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1692 on: November 02, 2010, 01:24:01 pm »
Gruden also stated during the last series for the Texans that the defense was playing a 'Tampa 2' or something to that effect, and that nobody ran that anymore because a  'good' offensive coordinator could adjust on the fly and tear it to bits.

I know they ran a cover2 almost the entire game or some variation of it. I don't know that I saw them in a tampa2 but maybe once, but Gruden would know, so maybe they were. There are plenty of teams that still run the cover2 and the tampa2, which is just a version of cover2. It's being run a lot less primarily due to the popularity of the 3-4 defensive alignment as more teams are moving away from a base 4-3. It's effectivness depends on the corner's ability to jam the reciever, the safety's quickness/ability to read/coverage skills, the LB's coverage ability/athleticism and the ability of the d-line to get pressure on the QB before the WRs can find a hole in the zone. It can be beat just like any other scheme if the offense schemes and executes properly and the defense fails to execute.
"Buenos Dias, shitheads."

Outlawscotty

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 932
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1693 on: November 02, 2010, 01:32:30 pm »
Actually, he or Young discussed that at length in the pre-game.  He mentioned that the Houston D was as vanilla as it gets, and that won't work in today's NFL.  That there is no gimmick makes it easy to plan for and he would love to line up against it.  

I was talking about the Colts running that defense during the last Texans offensive drive (hurry-up offense).  It's as if the Colts just knew that Schaub couldn't or wouldn't change the offensive style.  The Colts were basically daring them to run up the middle because of the soft middle.  Gruden called the Foster run up the middle two seconds before it happened, and it worked.  Then, right back to dropping back and fumbling. 

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1694 on: November 02, 2010, 01:53:50 pm »
Gruden called the Foster run up the middle two seconds before it happened, and it worked.

Gruden and 5 million other people.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

EasTexAstro

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5748
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1695 on: November 02, 2010, 02:13:42 pm »
I called for them to mix it up a little to start the game. They threw a pass. I was happy to see it.

Why they didn't run the ball 90% of the time after that, I will never know. I never thought I would, but I had to turn off the TV. I will watch and root for a team no matter what....normally. That show last night had my blood boiling.

On top of that, the defense, even against the skeleton crew the Colts sent out, was better than I expected them to be. There was no reason that game shouldn't have been won or at least down to the wire.

Pitiful.

 
It's my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of 'em was one kinda sombitch or another.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1696 on: November 02, 2010, 02:15:48 pm »
Why they didn't run the ball 90% of the time after that, I will never know. I never thought I would, but I had to turn off the TV. I will watch and root for a team no matter what....normally. That show last night had my blood boiling.

Pitiful.

 

X 1 Million.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1697 on: November 02, 2010, 02:50:16 pm »
I've noticed with Cushing this year that teams seem to be exploiting his aggressiveness and tendency to stunt on his blitzes-- lots of cutbacks and play action to his spot on the field.

Defense was not the issue last night.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

DVauthrin

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1698 on: November 02, 2010, 03:01:16 pm »

This is where NFL coaches out-think themselves.  Who gives a fuck if they expect it?  They expected it in the second half of the first game they played and could not do dick about it.  They could not do dick about it yesterday.  I would have run the fucking ball down their throats until they proved to me (multiple downs in a row) that they could stop it.  Not like the game was getting out of hand scoring wise.  Early in the game there was NEVER any reason to NOT run the ball last night.  I knew somewhere HH was going nuts...

Couldn't have said it better myself.
Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1699 on: November 02, 2010, 03:27:58 pm »
The Texans as a soccer team.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1700 on: November 02, 2010, 03:36:29 pm »
Defense was not the issue last night.

Not the only issue.  As in they were better than before, but still not good.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1701 on: November 02, 2010, 04:14:47 pm »
Not the only issue.  As in they were better than before, but still not good.

The Colts (Manning) make a lot of folks look "not good".  That said, the scoring defense was quite good, I thought.  If you had known prior to the game that the D would give up 23 - at Indy - would you have taken it?  Against Indy you have to make Manning a spectator, Houston looked like they had game-planned to outscore them.  Take the air out of the ball and pound 'em, when the backers and safteys start cheating up run some play-action.  Even if it does not work out 100% (indy gave no indication that it would not work, though) you still compress the game, which against Indy gives you a much better chance of winning.  Also to note, keeping the opposing team's offense off the field also keeps your defense off the field.  In the Texan's case, that is a Win - Win.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1702 on: November 03, 2010, 09:55:58 am »
I'm now firmly in HH's "Kubiak is an idiot" club.

In yesterday's presser, Kubiak said that going for the 4th down is a "gut feeling" and that he gave no consideration to whether he would go on 4th at midfield when they faced the 3rd and 2.

This is a beginner checkers player trying to keep up with Gary Kasparov at chess.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1703 on: November 03, 2010, 11:29:52 am »
I'm now firmly in HH's "Kubiak is an idiot" club.

In yesterday's presser, Kubiak said that going for the 4th down is a "gut feeling" and that he gave no consideration to whether he would go on 4th at midfield when they faced the 3rd and 2.

This is a beginner checkers player trying to keep up with Gary Kasparov at chess.

Drunk off my arse in a bar playing pool, I'm still thinking more than one shot ahead.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Ebby Calvin

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3595
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1704 on: November 03, 2010, 11:41:50 am »
Drunk off my arse in a bar playing pool, I'm still thinking more than one shot ahead.

Jaeger, then some tequila, then a Red Raider Slut?
Don't think twice, it's alright.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1705 on: November 03, 2010, 01:13:52 pm »
Jaeger, then some tequila, then a Red Raider Slut?

I've had a Red Raider slut, but I don't think we're talking about the same thing.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

roadrunner

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2164
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1706 on: November 03, 2010, 03:31:30 pm »
Moss to the Titans....yikes

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1707 on: November 03, 2010, 03:52:22 pm »
Moss to the Titans....yikes

I don't know how to link to individual tweets, but Adam Schefter's response was "Tennessee hasn't played Houston yet. Houston has the NFL's 32nd-ranked pass defense. Advantage, Titans."

Joy.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1708 on: November 03, 2010, 04:13:28 pm »
I don't know how to link to individual tweets, but Adam Schefter's response was "Tennessee hasn't played Houston yet. Houston has the NFL's 32nd-ranked pass defense. Advantage, Titans."

Joy.

Just make sure nobody says anything to upset him, and he won't even try against the Texans.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1709 on: November 03, 2010, 04:18:19 pm »
Just make sure nobody says anything to upset him, and he won't even try against the Texans.

He sure as hell won't be blocking on Johnson's carries.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1710 on: November 03, 2010, 06:03:29 pm »
He sure as hell won't be blocking on Johnson's carries.

Blocking ain't Randy's game.  Randy hacks on 2-0.

MikeyBoy

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2572
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1711 on: November 05, 2010, 06:57:57 am »
For The Princess Bride fans, from here: battlredblog

Quote
Larry Coyer: All right. What will the Texans offense do? The battle of wits has begun. It ends when you, Gary Kubiak, through your offensive coordinator Rick Dennison, decide what plays to run, and we find out who is right... and who is dead.
Gary Kubiak: But it's so simple. All I have to do is divine from what I know of you: Are you the sort of man who presides over a defense that can stop the run? Now, a clever man would run the ball, because it worked so amazingly well in Week One when our teams met, and because he would know that only a great fool would consciously depart from what's already proven to work against your defense. I am not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose to pass. But you must have known I was not a great fool; you would have counted on it, so I can clearly not run the ball.
Coyer: You've made your decision then?
Kubes: Not remotely.
"Buenos Dias, shitheads."

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1712 on: November 05, 2010, 09:27:01 am »
What's the over/under on yards amassed by SD this week? Aren't they already *averaging* something like 450 yds/game?
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

roadrunner

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2164
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1713 on: November 05, 2010, 09:39:54 am »
What's the over/under on yards amassed by SD this week? Aren't they already *averaging* something like 450 yds/game?

I don't know but I have Rivers on my fantasy team and picked up Garrard for next week against the Texans.  I might as well make the best out of my team's struggles.

EasTexAstro

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5748
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1714 on: November 05, 2010, 10:24:58 am »
i know y'all won't believe this, but the Texans are scheduled to win this week. They are on CBS.
It's my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of 'em was one kinda sombitch or another.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1715 on: November 05, 2010, 10:28:34 am »
What's the over/under on yards amassed by SD this week? Aren't they already *averaging* something like 450 yds/game?

Gates will likely be out this Sunday, which is huge

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1716 on: November 05, 2010, 10:39:01 am »
i know y'all won't believe this, but the Texans are scheduled to win this week. They are on CBS.

Not likely.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1717 on: November 05, 2010, 10:39:32 am »
Gates will likely be out this Sunday, which is huge

Every one and their momma was out last week and that did not matter.

EasTexAstro

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5748
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1718 on: November 05, 2010, 10:52:15 am »
Not likely.

They haven't lost a game on CBS this year.
It's my estimation that every man ever got a statue made of 'em was one kinda sombitch or another.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1719 on: November 05, 2010, 11:14:56 am »
They haven't lost a game on CBS this year.

CBS is the Texans' Wednesdays.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1720 on: November 05, 2010, 11:28:09 am »
They haven't lost a game on CBS this year.

Yet.

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1721 on: November 05, 2010, 08:08:38 pm »
Every one and their momma was out last week and that did not matter.

Except for the only momma that mattered. Until 18 misses a game (and he never has to my knowledge) there are no guaranteed wins against those cocksuckers. I hope you didn't seriously expect to sweep the Colts. I wasn't happy with the result Monday night (or the offensive playcalling) but I'd managed my expectations accordingly. I shrugged and drank my beer.

Rivers will probably throw it all over the yard on Sunday, but losing Gates at the same time that Floyd and Naanee are out could prove to be a timely advantage for the Texans. The defense didn't suck Monday night as badly as they've sucked in previous weeks, and I expect to see the Texans perform better offensively this week against the Chargers. This is the game for Jacoby Jones to shine on special teams. As bad as the Texans have been this season defending the pass, the Chargers are just as bad on special teams. They've allowed three return TDs and the most return yardage this season. JJ could break a long kickoff return to give the Texans a boost. He may not take one all the way, but his return ability should give the Texans good field position consistently.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1722 on: November 06, 2010, 09:48:44 am »
Except for the only momma that mattered. Until 18 misses a game (and he never has to my knowledge) there are no guaranteed wins against those cocksuckers. I hope you didn't seriously expect to sweep the Colts. I wasn't happy with the result Monday night (or the offensive playcalling) but I'd managed my expectations accordingly. I shrugged and drank my beer.

Rivers will probably throw it all over the yard on Sunday, but losing Gates at the same time that Floyd and Naanee are out could prove to be a timely advantage for the Texans. The defense didn't suck Monday night as badly as they've sucked in previous weeks, and I expect to see the Texans perform better offensively this week against the Chargers. This is the game for Jacoby Jones to shine on special teams. As bad as the Texans have been this season defending the pass, the Chargers are just as bad on special teams. They've allowed three return TDs and the most return yardage this season. JJ could break a long kickoff return to give the Texans a boost. He may not take one all the way, but his return ability should give the Texans good field position consistently.

I really hope you are right.  I am not that optimistic.

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1723 on: November 07, 2010, 12:09:58 pm »
And just like that, the Chargers special teams shows up in a big way for the Texans. Blocked punt, Texans football, Arian Foster TD.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1724 on: November 07, 2010, 12:11:46 pm »
And just like that, the Chargers special teams shows up in a big way for the Texans. Blocked punt, Texans football, Arian Foster TD.

Kris may have to punt and kick....if the Texans D can prevent them from scoring on every drive.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1725 on: November 07, 2010, 12:22:29 pm »
And just like that, the Chargers special teams shows up in a big way for the Texans. Blocked punt, Texans football, Arian Foster TD.

hard to understand how an nfl team could have such horrible special teams.  i watched their game against the raiders, and it was just astonishing how high school their punt blocking is.

and... houston secondary in the hizzouse

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1726 on: November 07, 2010, 12:23:55 pm »
Arrrgh. I fuckin knew that Ajirotutu would get a big TD pass and considered playing him in my money league, but didn't have the spare roster spot for a one-week play.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1727 on: November 07, 2010, 12:24:18 pm »
Great challenge, Kubes.

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1728 on: November 07, 2010, 12:30:23 pm »
Foster is making some brilliant plays with his eyes and his feet today. This guy is very good.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1729 on: November 07, 2010, 12:32:03 pm »
Foster is making some brilliant plays with his eyes and his feet today. This guy is very good.

3rd and 5.  hey kubes--- run it again!

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1730 on: November 07, 2010, 12:32:54 pm »
Jacoby Jones has concrete mitts. Jesus fuckin A, Jacoby, you have to make that play.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1731 on: November 07, 2010, 12:36:24 pm »
tonight on the amazing race:  "a game of bowling that will KNOCK YOU OUT"

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1732 on: November 07, 2010, 12:38:50 pm »


worst player on the field for either team:  zach diles.  watch him on any given play and you will feel like punching him through the screen.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1733 on: November 07, 2010, 12:39:07 pm »
Now the Chargers are just fucking with the Texans

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1734 on: November 07, 2010, 12:43:49 pm »
This defense is putrid - why don't they ever use draft picks on it?
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1735 on: November 07, 2010, 12:46:19 pm »
This defense is putrid - why don't they ever use draft picks on it?

Oh that Stansbury wit

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1736 on: November 07, 2010, 12:55:26 pm »
Foster Foster and more Foster. Keep at it, Kubes.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1737 on: November 07, 2010, 12:56:29 pm »
Foster Foster and more Foster. Keep at it, Kubes.

I support it and am trying not to focus on the past, but it just makes that MNF loss more painful.  The Chargers actually have a good defense.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1738 on: November 07, 2010, 12:57:24 pm »
Foster Foster and more Foster. Keep at it, Kubes.

Hundred imaginary bucks we see play action here, only question is whether it'll be a flareout to dreesen or a forced ball in the corner of the endzone to johnson

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1739 on: November 07, 2010, 12:58:35 pm »
Hundred imaginary bucks we see play action here, only question is whether it'll be a flareout to dreesen or a forced ball in the corner of the endzone to johnson

Yeah, I won the imaginary bet!  bailed out by pass interference.  and of course foster fucking obliterates the charger d on the next play.  hey rick & kubes, this isn't that hard when you have good players.

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1740 on: November 07, 2010, 12:59:24 pm »
Makes me feel a little better about our chances that they are playing that tub of goo johnson.
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1741 on: November 07, 2010, 01:06:27 pm »
Makes me feel a little better about our chances that they are playing that tub of goo johnson.

"2005 first rounder"  sad it was that recent.

btw, chargers fans and loudmouth internet message board posters must be yelling: "hey norv, THROW THE BALL!"  it's an olympics of the mind here in houston
« Last Edit: November 07, 2010, 01:08:04 pm by Joey Trum »

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1742 on: November 07, 2010, 01:20:57 pm »
I like what kubes is doing here, especially with us getting the ball to start EH, but I am definitely worried we will somehow fuck it up
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1743 on: November 07, 2010, 01:21:57 pm »
I like what kubes is doing here, especially with us getting the ball to start EH, but I am definitely worried we will somehow fuck it up

Well, schaub just tried to throw a pick 6 from his own 4.

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1744 on: November 07, 2010, 01:22:16 pm »
EH = 2H
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1745 on: November 07, 2010, 01:23:34 pm »
Well, schaub just tried to throw a pick 6 from his own 4.

to his 3rd string tight end

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1746 on: November 07, 2010, 01:24:09 pm »
What a stupid fucking play call. They haven't stopped Foster all day and you get cute with it. Fucking retarded.

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1747 on: November 07, 2010, 01:24:47 pm »
I could really use these fantasy points from Foster, but you know it won't stand.

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1748 on: November 07, 2010, 01:25:39 pm »
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck.

Go for it Kubiak, run Foster right at them.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1749 on: November 07, 2010, 01:29:27 pm »
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck.

Go for it Kubiak, run Foster right at them.

That has to be the worst rule in the whole rule book.  Hate it.  I thought it was a touch for cincy a few months ago and I still think it should be a touchdown.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1750 on: November 07, 2010, 01:32:19 pm »
That has to be the worst rule in the whole rule book.  Hate it.  I thought it was a touch for cincy a few months ago and I still think it should be a touchdown.

It makes no sense to me.  A player can break the plane on a run play by a centimeter and fumble, but that's not a catch?  I don't get it and hopefully it gets changed in the offseason.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1751 on: November 07, 2010, 01:34:22 pm »
So I pull up the game and look at the stats and I see Foster has 18 carries for 99 yards and two touchdowns. I'm thinking Even Kubiak can't fuck that up. Then I look at the play by play and study the last drive for a second. Second and goal from the, what, the four? And Kubiak throws it twice? How that motherfucker has any job at all in the NFL is way beyond my understanding.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1752 on: November 07, 2010, 01:37:10 pm »
So I pull up the game and look at the stats and I see Foster has 18 carries for 99 yards and two touchdowns. I'm thinking Even Kubiak can't fuck that up. Then I look at the play by play and study the last drive for a second. Second and goal from the, what, the four? And Kubiak throws it twice? How that motherfucker has any job at all in the NFL is way beyond my understanding.

The stats don't do the stupidity justice.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1753 on: November 07, 2010, 01:39:15 pm »
So I pull up the game and look at the stats and I see Foster has 18 carries for 99 yards and two touchdowns. I'm thinking Even Kubiak can't fuck that up. Then I look at the play by play and study the last drive for a second. Second and goal from the, what, the four? And Kubiak throws it twice? How that motherfucker has any job at all in the NFL is way beyond my understanding.

I am expecting them to loose, so to be honest, I am not mad today.  If they win in spite of themselves then I might get back on the train.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1754 on: November 07, 2010, 01:42:40 pm »
So I pull up the game and look at the stats and I see Foster has 18 carries for 99 yards and two touchdowns. I'm thinking Even Kubiak can't fuck that up. Then I look at the play by play and study the last drive for a second. Second and goal from the, what, the four? And Kubiak throws it twice? How that motherfucker has any job at all in the NFL is way beyond my understanding.

the 2nd and goal out route to the 3rd string tight end was classic kubiak outsmarting himself.  fortunately, the guy on the other sideline is his equal.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1755 on: November 07, 2010, 01:44:22 pm »
I'm glad the team has started to focus its offensive scheme around the 3rd string TE.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1756 on: November 07, 2010, 01:45:42 pm »
I'm glad the team has started to focus its offensive scheme around the 3rd string TE.
especially when you have one of the best running games in the league.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1757 on: November 07, 2010, 01:46:29 pm »
I'm glad the team has started to focus its offensive scheme around the 3rd string TE.

"only a fool would force the ball to his 3rd string tight end while his running back is dominating, and i am not a fool so surely i will not force the ball to casey..."

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1758 on: November 07, 2010, 01:50:46 pm »
It's not good news when your kicker has converted on 27, 25, 21 in one game.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1759 on: November 07, 2010, 01:53:03 pm »
It's not good news when your kicker has converted on 27, 25, 21 in one game.

umm why cant foster play an entire series?

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1760 on: November 07, 2010, 01:58:21 pm »
Eugene Wilson in "Shadow Runner"

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1761 on: November 07, 2010, 02:01:37 pm »
This might be the worst tackling effort I've seen this year. From my vantage point on my couch, the scheme has guys in position to make the defensive play calls successful but they can't tackle worth shit.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1762 on: November 07, 2010, 02:13:46 pm »
Jacoby Jones has actually made a couple of decent catches today.  Surprise, surprise!
Grab another Coke and let's die

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1763 on: November 07, 2010, 02:14:54 pm »
seems like you might have wanted to be up by more than a FG, but I'm no NFL coach

Savage

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 962
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1764 on: November 07, 2010, 02:17:07 pm »
seems like you might have wanted to be up by more than a FG, but I'm no NFL coach

B/c this defense can stop San Diego?

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1765 on: November 07, 2010, 02:20:04 pm »
seems like you might have wanted to be up by more than a FG, but I'm no NFL coach

Totally agree with going for it. A five point lead with an entire quarter left against Rivers is nothing.

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1766 on: November 07, 2010, 02:22:08 pm »
Holy fuck yes! I have seen it all now. The Houston Texans just intercepted an opposing qb.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1767 on: November 07, 2010, 02:23:16 pm »
Texans almost got fucked by all the new age NFL rules.  Rivers needs to shut the fuck up every once in a while.

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1768 on: November 07, 2010, 02:23:18 pm »
Jackson of all people
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1769 on: November 07, 2010, 02:25:15 pm »
Texans almost got fucked by all the new age NFL rules.  Rivers needs to shut the fuck up every once in a while.
As does Dan Fouts. Fucking moron.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1770 on: November 07, 2010, 02:30:04 pm »
As does Dan Fouts. Fucking moron.

Don't forget he used to be Chargers QB.
Grab another Coke and let's die

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1771 on: November 07, 2010, 02:31:23 pm »
Don't forget he used to be Chargers QB.

How could I forget? I'm old enough to remember Vernon Perry.

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1772 on: November 07, 2010, 02:33:00 pm »
That thing about momentum might have been some of the most incomprehensible nonsense I've ever heard
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1773 on: November 07, 2010, 02:36:00 pm »
More bleating about penalty calls.
Grab another Coke and let's die

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1774 on: November 07, 2010, 02:36:23 pm »

Holy bedazzling bejesus, kareem jackson

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1775 on: November 07, 2010, 02:36:51 pm »
Whose idea is it to keep jackson on as island?

Going for two here idiotic
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1776 on: November 07, 2010, 02:38:59 pm »
Don't understand why they went for 2.  But hey, they got it.
Grab another Coke and let's die

Savage

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 962
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1777 on: November 07, 2010, 02:39:26 pm »
Whose idea is it to keep jackson on as island?

Going for two here idiotic

He's a fucking disaster.  The fact that Kubiak keeps trotting his ass out there is a fireable offense all by itself.  

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1778 on: November 07, 2010, 02:40:20 pm »
Well at least give him some help, he's certainly not darelle revis
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1779 on: November 07, 2010, 02:43:39 pm »
What's the rush? Guess he's conceding we need two TDs to win this
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1780 on: November 07, 2010, 02:45:06 pm »
That was a fucking travesty
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1781 on: November 07, 2010, 02:45:19 pm »
WTF?

Fuck this officiating crew.
Grab another Coke and let's die

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1782 on: November 07, 2010, 02:46:24 pm »
Is there a bigger douche in the NFL than Philip Rivers?

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1783 on: November 07, 2010, 02:46:41 pm »
Philip rivers is sure an annoying sumbitch
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1784 on: November 07, 2010, 02:47:34 pm »
WTF?

Fuck this officiating crew.

The Texans got horribly fucked there. That was atrocious.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1785 on: November 07, 2010, 02:47:47 pm »
ok, seriously, my vote is no more kubiak.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1786 on: November 07, 2010, 02:47:54 pm »
Eat a bowl of cat shit, Gary Kubiak.
Grab another Coke and let's die

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1787 on: November 07, 2010, 02:48:31 pm »
Whatever cowher wants, just give it to him
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1788 on: November 07, 2010, 02:51:51 pm »
My understanding was that if SD asked for a penalty they got it
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1789 on: November 07, 2010, 02:52:30 pm »
My god they should just rename them the San Diego Superdouches. An entire sideline of jackholes apoplectic about not getting a PI flag on the Texans.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1790 on: November 07, 2010, 02:52:49 pm »
Whatever cowher wants, just give it to him

The Texans are the 6th most valuable franchise in the world.  They should be able to shell-out cash on a coach that isn't one of the central figures from Of Mice and Men.

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1791 on: November 07, 2010, 02:54:15 pm »
Slow down you fucking idiots
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1792 on: November 07, 2010, 02:55:25 pm »
The only way to stop Arian Foster is to rename him Gary Kubiak.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1793 on: November 07, 2010, 02:55:46 pm »
What if we ran Foster coming out of the 2 minute warning?  Or would that be too fucking awesome for Kubiak to handle?

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1794 on: November 07, 2010, 02:56:35 pm »
What if we ran Foster coming out of the 2 minute warning?  Or would that be too fucking awesome for Kubiak?

Do I know what a rhetorical question is?!

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1795 on: November 07, 2010, 02:58:29 pm »
And there it is
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1796 on: November 07, 2010, 02:59:08 pm »
the texans have found new ways to lose

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1797 on: November 07, 2010, 02:59:33 pm »
Hey, the officiating has sucked so bad...maybe they'll blow this review too!
Grab another Coke and let's die

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1798 on: November 07, 2010, 03:00:34 pm »
When shit like that happens, you have to wonder what's buried underground the Astrodome complex.

F'ing texans indeed.

Houston pro football is cursed.

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1799 on: November 07, 2010, 03:00:36 pm »
I have to say.   I'm not a Texan fan; couldn't care less about them.   Sometimes I root for them, sometimes I root against em, sometimes I just don't give a shit.

As a complete outsider with no dog in this fight...whoever calls the offensive plays (is it Kubiak?) is indefensibly stupid.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1800 on: November 07, 2010, 03:02:59 pm »
When shit like that happens, you have to wonder what's buried underground the Astrodome complex.

F'ing texans indeed.

Houston pro football is cursed.

Hey now, don't go turning in to a Cubs fan.

All they need is a coach who's dumb enough to use actually use their star players instead of trying to get cute.
Grab another Coke and let's die

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1801 on: November 07, 2010, 03:04:13 pm »
I have to say.   I'm not a Texan fan; couldn't care less about them.   Sometimes I root for them, sometimes I root against em, sometimes I just don't give a shit.

As a complete outsider with no dog in this fight...whoever calls the offensive plays (is it Kubiak?) is indefensibly stupid.

If you are basing this on that last play, you're mistaken. That was a TD all the way but our All-Universe WR inexplicably bobbled the pass and it bounced off his knee and into the arms of the db. Kubiak didn't fuck that one up, Andre did.

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1802 on: November 07, 2010, 03:04:49 pm »
Hey now, don't go turning in to a Cubs fan.

All they need is a coach who's dumb enough to use actually use their star players instead of trying to get cute.

You mean Andre Johnson, right?

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1803 on: November 07, 2010, 03:05:45 pm »
The last play was a freak thing - being in that situation was the result of 30 mins of incompetence
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1804 on: November 07, 2010, 03:06:05 pm »
If you are basing this on that last play, you're mistaken. That was a TD all the way but our All-Universe WR inexplicably bobbled the pass and it bounced off his knee and into the arms of the db. Kubiak didn't fuck that one up, Andre did.

Ah.

I can't see it.   For some reason, they don't show Texans games up here.

Even so, why were they going for the whole thing with a buck and change to go?   You just want to dare Felipe Rios to drag the team downfield to beat you on a FG as time expires?

Why weren't they trying to kill some clock first?

I get you have to score, so fine, move the chains, kill some clock.


hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1805 on: November 07, 2010, 03:07:04 pm »
If you are basing this on that last play, you're mistaken. That was a TD all the way but our All-Universe WR inexplicably bobbled the pass and it bounced off his knee and into the arms of the db. Kubiak didn't fuck that one up, Andre did.

Yeah, that play was just one of those inexplicable moments.  If the angle off his knee is a couple degrees different or the defender is one foot out of his current spot, that doesn't happen.  The Texans did about 97 things to lose that game prior to that play.  

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1806 on: November 07, 2010, 03:07:17 pm »
It was just a ten yard slant
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1807 on: November 07, 2010, 03:08:43 pm »
It was just a ten yard slant

Oh was it.    Again, I'm just going off the NFL.COM game center, which just accounted for it as "M.Schaub pass deep middle intended for A.Johnson INTERCEPTED by P.Oliver at SD 9. "

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1808 on: November 07, 2010, 03:09:00 pm »
He kneed it a mile
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1809 on: November 07, 2010, 03:09:47 pm »
They weren't going for the whole thing, Alkie. It was a great play call and the pass was on target with AJ in stride but he bobbled the ball and it bounced of his leg and became an interception. Think "Immaculate Interception."

AJ would've scored rather easily. He had open field to the end zone and one man to beat.

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1810 on: November 07, 2010, 03:10:20 pm »
They weren't going for the whole thing, Alkie. It was a great play call and the pass was on target with AJ in stride but he bobbled the ball and it bounced of his leg and became an interception. Think "Immaculate Interception."

AJ would've scored rather easily. He had open field to the end zone and one man to beat.

Cool.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1811 on: November 07, 2010, 03:12:26 pm »
The 4th and 1 "sneak" rather than using Arian Foster just one time in the 4th on a running play.  sigh.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1812 on: November 07, 2010, 03:13:48 pm »
Hey now, don't go turning in to a Cubs fan.

All they need is a coach who's dumb enough to use actually use their star players instead of trying to get cute.

The cubs have made the playoffs, but let's not bring them into this discussion.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1813 on: November 07, 2010, 03:42:50 pm »
Eagerly awaiting the part in the press conference where Kubiak claims Arian Foster couldn't play a whole series because "he doesn't have the conditioning."
Grab another Coke and let's die

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1814 on: November 07, 2010, 03:48:04 pm »
Eagerly awaiting the part in the press conference where Kubiak claims Arian Foster couldn't play a whole series because "he doesn't have the conditioning."

Horrible.  bad referee, bad play calling, just bad.

roadrunner

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2164
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1815 on: November 07, 2010, 05:19:56 pm »
Typical

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1816 on: November 14, 2010, 10:51:45 am »
Who's excited to watch the playoff hopes officially go down in flames today?

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1817 on: November 14, 2010, 12:02:02 pm »
Who's excited to watch the playoff hopes officially go down in flames today?

I just took a giant shit, so I'm ready. 
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1818 on: November 14, 2010, 12:56:36 pm »
So let me get this straight: last week Kubes killed us by calling passing plays for short yards against a defense that couldn't stop the run and this week he's killing us by calling running plays for long yards against a pass defense almost as bad as the Texans.  

It's as if he's trying to lose.  
« Last Edit: November 14, 2010, 01:05:35 pm by Limey »
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1819 on: November 14, 2010, 01:25:18 pm »
What the fuck was that to finish the half?
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1820 on: November 14, 2010, 01:26:27 pm »
WHAT...THE...FUCK !!!!!!!!!

The half ends with the ball in the Texans' hands and THREE ... THREE timeouts left. 


Fire that useless cunt at halftime.   
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

roadrunner

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2164
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1821 on: November 14, 2010, 01:28:48 pm »
Wow.

I'm not surprised something like that would happen, but still...wow.

This is the nail in Kubiak's coffin.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1822 on: November 14, 2010, 01:28:56 pm »
What the fuck was that to finish the half?

Well, it wasn't a pass by Garrard, which is pissing me off because he's my substitute QB today.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1823 on: November 14, 2010, 01:33:03 pm »
This is the nail in Kubiak's coffin.

Why would you say that? After all McNair has seen he gave Kubiak a vote of confidence last week. What would Kubiak have to do to demonstrate to McNair that he is incompetent? I can't think of anything else he could possibly do.

That last sequence to end the half was pretty special, though, I must say.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

roadrunner

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2164
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1824 on: November 14, 2010, 01:35:46 pm »
Why would you say that? After all McNair has seen he gave Kubiak a vote of confidence last week. What would Kubiak have to do to demonstrate to McNair that he is incompetent? I can't think of anything else he could possibly do.

That last sequence to end the half was pretty special, though, I must say.

Kubiak will finish the season, no doubt.  I mean, do you really want to hand the team over to Frank Bush or Rick Dennison?  Hell no.

But missing the playoffs and a meaningless November/December will cost him the job

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1825 on: November 14, 2010, 01:38:14 pm »
So - cowher, gruden, or dungy?
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1826 on: November 14, 2010, 01:48:48 pm »
So - cowher, gruden, or dungy?

Kubiak is signed through 2012 I believe. The owners will lock out the players because the players make too much money and who cares if they won't be able to walk when they're 45? So I don't see McNair paying two coaches, one who does nothing and the other who will be doing nothing. I certainly don't see him paying a high profile coach who may command $10MM a year.

I'd love Cowher, though.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1827 on: November 14, 2010, 02:02:25 pm »
How do you leave Andre alone in the endzone?!  Thanks!
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1828 on: November 14, 2010, 02:06:11 pm »
Well, it wasn't a pass by Garrard, which is pissing me off because he's my substitute QB today.

He's doing a fine job handing it off to MJD for me
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1829 on: November 14, 2010, 02:09:17 pm »
Makes more sense:  gassed-up Jack or Sarah Palin?
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1830 on: November 14, 2010, 02:12:06 pm »
Makes more sense:  gassed-up Jack or Sarah Palin?

Keeping low doesn't make no SENSE!
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1831 on: November 14, 2010, 02:12:54 pm »
Keeping low doesn't make no SENSE!

Neither does screeching about tranquility. 
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1832 on: November 14, 2010, 02:21:20 pm »
The owners will lock out the players because the players make too much money and who cares if they won't be able to walk when they're 45?

Goodell repeatedly says that the players' health is the NFL's top priority.  Which is why the season needs two more games, the league never bothers to employ a team's bye week when scheduling a monday or thursday game, and the players don't deserve to have medical benefits when the owners lock them out.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1833 on: November 14, 2010, 02:24:27 pm »
Goodell repeatedly says that the players' health is the NFL's top priority.  Which is why the season needs two more games, the league never bothers to employ a team's bye week when scheduling a monday or thursday game, and the players don't deserve to have medical benefits when the owners lock them out.

It's mind boggling. It really is. It is causing me to reevaluate seriously my support of the league. Vonta Leach will likely be a broken human being when he is my age and a group of billionaires are going to tell him he makes too much money.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1834 on: November 14, 2010, 02:37:58 pm »
Nice fucking challenge, Kubiak.  it is a shitty rule, but a rule nonetheless.  You gotta know that and keep the fucking flag in your pocket, you will need that T.O. and possibly the challenge later.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1835 on: November 14, 2010, 02:38:15 pm »
If that is called an incompletion instead of a touch down then it is the application of one the dumbest fucking rules in professional sports.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1836 on: November 14, 2010, 02:39:27 pm »
Nice fucking challenge, Kubiak.  it is a shitty rule, but a rule nonetheless.  You gotta know that and keep the fucking flag in your pocket, you will need that T.O. and possibly the challenge later.

nevermind

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1837 on: November 14, 2010, 02:39:46 pm »
Nice fucking challenge, Kubiak.  it is a shitty rule, but a rule nonetheless.  You gotta know that and keep the fucking flag in your pocket, you will need that T.O. and possibly the challenge later.

Indeed.  Or not.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1838 on: November 14, 2010, 02:40:26 pm »
If that is called an incompletion instead of a touch down then it is the application of one the dumbest fucking rules in professional sports.

absolutely!  I did not know the NFL had reviewed the application of that rule.  Glad they did, though, as it was BS

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1839 on: November 14, 2010, 02:40:35 pm »
Nice fucking challenge, Kubiak.  it is a shitty rule, but a rule nonetheless.  You gotta know that and keep the fucking flag in your pocket, you will need that T.O. and possibly the challenge later.

Bravo
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1840 on: November 14, 2010, 02:41:06 pm »
Touchdown, motherfucker.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1841 on: November 14, 2010, 02:41:09 pm »
Nice fucking challenge, Kubiak.  it is a shitty rule, but a rule nonetheless.  You gotta know that and keep the fucking flag in your pocket, you will need that T.O. and possibly the challenge later.

Nominated.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1842 on: November 14, 2010, 02:41:49 pm »
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1843 on: November 14, 2010, 02:43:23 pm »
for what?

my prognosticating skills are dulled by the alcohol.  I am in the processe of gettting drunk enough to watch the Cowboys game.

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1844 on: November 14, 2010, 02:44:01 pm »
my prognostication skills are dulled by the alcohol.  I am in the processe of gettting drunk enough to watch the Cowboys game.

is there enough alcohol in texas for this?
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1845 on: November 14, 2010, 02:45:15 pm »
is there enough alcohol in texas for this?

we will soon to find out. 

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1846 on: November 14, 2010, 02:46:47 pm »
I do want to apologize to the Texans fans.  I bet on Houston (hooked it with Dallas and the under for a three teamer)...based on my gambling track record, not a good sign

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1847 on: November 14, 2010, 02:47:13 pm »
I am in the processe of gettting drunk enough to watch the Cowboys game.

aka passed out
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1848 on: November 14, 2010, 02:47:49 pm »

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1849 on: November 14, 2010, 02:54:50 pm »
Shank!

Time to start running the ball, Gary!
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1850 on: November 14, 2010, 02:56:32 pm »
Shank!

Time to start running the ball, Gary!

No idea why announcers continualy call that a shank.  Rightie going dead left is a snap hook.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1851 on: November 14, 2010, 02:57:56 pm »
No idea why announcers continualy call that a shank.  Rightie going dead left is a snap hook.

Why does it have to mean the same thing in football that it does in golf?  In football, a shank is just a blown kick.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1852 on: November 14, 2010, 02:58:58 pm »
Textbook Texans.
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1853 on: November 14, 2010, 03:00:07 pm »
Argh.  Bad play all around.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1854 on: November 14, 2010, 03:00:09 pm »
Driessen's fumble spares them the embarrasment of not being able to get the field goal team on in time.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Lurch

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5931
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1855 on: November 14, 2010, 03:02:22 pm »
I've now seen it all.  FUCK
I wish the first word I had said when I was born was 'quote'. Then before I die, I could say, 'unquote.' --Steven Wright

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1856 on: November 14, 2010, 03:02:37 pm »
Holy fuck.  FUCK.  What?
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1857 on: November 14, 2010, 03:02:49 pm »
unfuckingbelievable.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1858 on: November 14, 2010, 03:02:54 pm »
The Texans are now immortal. And Garrard gets another TD pass.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1859 on: November 14, 2010, 03:02:58 pm »
there goes my fucking parlay

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1860 on: November 14, 2010, 03:03:23 pm »
I can't fucking believe it.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1861 on: November 14, 2010, 03:04:00 pm »
You fucking idiots.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1862 on: November 14, 2010, 03:04:21 pm »
This team is good at inventing new ways to lose
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1863 on: November 14, 2010, 03:04:37 pm »
Gus Johnson strikes again.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1864 on: November 14, 2010, 03:05:32 pm »
When a ball is coming to you, CATCH IT!!!
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1865 on: November 14, 2010, 03:06:02 pm »
When a ball is coming to you, CATCH IT!!!

They're taught the opposite in that situation.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1866 on: November 14, 2010, 03:06:32 pm »
Gus Johnson strikes again.

Isn't he doing the Lions game?
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1867 on: November 14, 2010, 03:07:06 pm »
They're taught the opposite in that situation.

If he had caught it, he probably would have run around and then been tackled for a safety.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1868 on: November 14, 2010, 03:07:40 pm »
This team is good at inventing new ways to lose

I finally just saw it here on a highlight.

I didn't know a Hail Mary could work at the pro level in 2010.   Wow.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1869 on: November 14, 2010, 03:09:00 pm »
They're taught the opposite in that situation.

No, only if they cannot secure it with two hands (or that is what my dad taught).  If you can catch it cleanly, you do so

roadrunner

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2164
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1870 on: November 14, 2010, 03:10:00 pm »
Classic Houston football.  A new way to lose

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1871 on: November 14, 2010, 03:10:57 pm »
In other news, jimmie Johnson says taht the Cowboys can play with the Giants.  He must ahve started drinking earlier than I did

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1872 on: November 14, 2010, 03:13:38 pm »
In other news, jimmie Johnson says taht the Cowboys can play with the Giants.  He must ahve started drinking earlier than I did

if they give effort, which they haven't done much of this season.  while i hate the giants, with buffalo winning, cowboys chance for the #1 pick has gone up.  if they win, there's a chance garrett could end up the head coach.   i am okay with the loss if it ultimately gets me what i want, #1 pick and new coaches.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1873 on: November 14, 2010, 03:14:58 pm »
My personal worst case scenario on many levels is that the cowboys end up with a luck-harbaugh package this offseason
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1874 on: November 14, 2010, 03:15:32 pm »
if they give effort, which they haven't done much of this season.  while i hate the giants, with buffalo winning, cowboys chance for the #1 pick has gone up.  if they win, there's a chance garrett could end up the head coach.   i am okay with the loss if it ultimately gets me what i want, #1 pick and new coaches.

The Giants are getting blown out today.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1875 on: November 14, 2010, 03:16:06 pm »
 i am okay with the loss if it ultimately gets me what i want, #1 pick and new coaches.

this.  Garrett is part of the problem, IMO.  I want the fat Ryan from Cleveland, actually.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1876 on: November 14, 2010, 03:17:07 pm »
My personal worst case scenario on many levels is that the cowboys end up with a luck-harbaugh package this offseason

do either Luck or harbaugh play on the O-line?  If not, you can keep 'em

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1877 on: November 14, 2010, 03:38:26 pm »
The Giants are getting blown out today.

at first i thought that said blown.

and since it doesn't, fuck you.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1878 on: November 14, 2010, 03:42:35 pm »
what the fuck, man.  was it in Garrett's plan to sabatoge Phillips all along?  he seems to have better playcalling skills as a HC. 

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1879 on: November 14, 2010, 03:45:16 pm »
I hate the Cowboys with great passion and delight. But that was a catch, plainly. It was not even close and the motherfucking official is standing right the fuck there. What the fuck is he looking at?
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1880 on: November 14, 2010, 03:45:40 pm »
what the fuck, man.  was it in Garrett's plan to sabatoge Phillips all along?  he seems to have better playcalling skills as a HC. 

it is still early in the game.  give him time to fuck it up.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1881 on: November 14, 2010, 03:46:55 pm »
it is still early in the game.  give him time to fuck it up.

the only way that he could fuck it up is to stop throwing to Dez

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1882 on: November 14, 2010, 03:47:56 pm »
the only way that he could fuck it up is to stop throwing to Dez

Dez is becoming a huge stud.  I agree even more that Austin should be traded for picks.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1883 on: November 14, 2010, 03:51:19 pm »
And then they fuck up the PAT. Hilarious.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1884 on: November 14, 2010, 03:52:15 pm »
And then they fuck up the PAT. Hilarious.

It was partially blocked.  at least they have not fucked up a hail mary yet

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1885 on: November 14, 2010, 03:55:10 pm »
So, seriously, what professional sports franchise would be worse to follow than the Texans?  I could only come up with the Grizzlies and/or Raptors.  We shouldn't have to resort to canadian over-expansion. 

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1886 on: November 14, 2010, 03:55:56 pm »
weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.  who you gonna double bitches?!?  I fucking hate the giants.  If we go 2-14, at least we beat the right 2

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1887 on: November 14, 2010, 03:55:56 pm »
So, seriously, what professional sports franchise would be worse to follow than the Texans?  I could only come up with the Grizzlies and/or Raptors.  We shouldn't have to resort to canadian over-expansion. 

current Detroit Lions and Pittsburgh Pirates
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1888 on: November 14, 2010, 03:56:41 pm »
weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.  who you gonna double bitches?!?  I fucking hate the giants.  If we go 2-14, at least we beat the right 2

i wish i was watching the game with you today.  i would be rolling on the floor laughing at you.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1889 on: November 14, 2010, 03:56:58 pm »
It was partially blocked.  at least they have not fucked up a hail mary yet

Not yet. And don't worry, I am aware of who the Cowboys beat for their lone win of the year.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1890 on: November 14, 2010, 03:57:51 pm »
It was partially blocked.  at least they have not fucked up a hail mary yet

That would require actually being in the game when it's ending.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1891 on: November 14, 2010, 03:58:56 pm »
current Detroit Lions and Pittsburgh Pirates

I would throw the Bills in there and of course the Cowboys.

And that, on the other hand, was nowhere near to being a catch.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1892 on: November 14, 2010, 03:59:37 pm »
I wonder what Garrott calls the "Kitna falls down snapping the ball" play.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1893 on: November 14, 2010, 03:59:44 pm »
i wish i was watching the game with you today.  i would be rolling on the floor laughing at you.

yeah.  it sucks here.  I am watching all of the kids, have to watch my language and shit like that

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1894 on: November 14, 2010, 04:00:05 pm »
That would require actually being in the game when it's ending.

OH, SNAP!
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1895 on: November 14, 2010, 04:00:24 pm »
I wonder what Garrott calls the "Kitna falls down snapping the ball" play.

he needs to take the tennis balls off his walker, they get caught in the turf

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1896 on: November 14, 2010, 04:00:37 pm »
I would throw the Bills in there and of course the Cowboys.

And that, on the other hand, was nowhere near to being a catch.

I agree about the Bills, but if *you* are going to toss in the Cowboys, shouldn't *you* also include the Cubs?
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1897 on: November 14, 2010, 04:01:11 pm »
current Detroit Lions and Pittsburgh Pirates

Ok, I somewhat agree with the Pirates since they have apparently resigned themselves to make money via the revenue sharing in the MLB.  However, they have at least made the playoffs.  The Lions look like they have real promise this season and have made the playoffs in the past.  

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1898 on: November 14, 2010, 04:01:32 pm »
I wonder what Garrott calls the "Kitna falls down snapping the ball" play.

Three on four. On two, BREAK!
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1899 on: November 14, 2010, 04:02:28 pm »
I would throw the Bills in there and of course the Cowboys.

And that, on the other hand, was nowhere near to being a catch.

The Bills went to four straight super bowls.  I mean, painful yes, but I would trade the history of fandom in a heartbeat.

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1900 on: November 14, 2010, 04:02:41 pm »
I wonder what Garrott calls the "Kitna falls down snapping the ball" play.

It's Garrett, get it right.  He's the HEAD Coach of America's Team.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1901 on: November 14, 2010, 04:02:54 pm »
I agree about the Bills, but if *you* are going to toss in the Cowboys, shouldn't *you* also include the Cubs?

Why, because if you're a Cubs fan you are by definition a douche? Hmm, you may have a point there.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1902 on: November 14, 2010, 04:03:20 pm »
Why, because if you're a Cubs fan you are by definition a douche? Hmm, you may have a point there.

Did you just call me a douche?
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1903 on: November 14, 2010, 04:03:56 pm »
Why, because if you're a Cubs fan you are by definition a douche? Hmm, you may have a point there.

I'm an asshole, not a douche

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1904 on: November 14, 2010, 04:03:59 pm »
The Bills went to four straight super bowls.  I mean, painful yes, but I would trade the history of fandom in a heartbeat.

And they lost them all. I do not need that sort of heartbreak, thank you.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1905 on: November 14, 2010, 04:04:03 pm »
 The Lions look like they have real promise this season and have made the playoffs in the past.  

1999 was a long time ago.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1906 on: November 14, 2010, 04:07:22 pm »
1999 was a long time ago.

Would you rather a team in its "prime" like the Texans who still cannot make the playoffs or a team with a solid young core such as the Lions who have 2-3 years before they have legitimate expectations?  Clearly, the management of the Texans can't find the right pieces to complement their stars, and it doesn't seem like that's going to change.


chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1907 on: November 14, 2010, 04:07:47 pm »
I'm an asshole, not a douche

Actually as far as I can tell you're neither. But as a Cowboys fan you'd be warmly invited into either society.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1908 on: November 14, 2010, 04:14:46 pm »
Would you rather a team in its "prime" like the Texans who still cannot make the playoffs or a team with a solid young core such as the Lions who have 2-3 years before they have legitimate expectations?  Clearly, the management of the Texans can't find the right pieces to complement their stars, and it doesn't seem like that's going to change.



The Lions are, and always have been, horrible.  Andre Johnson = Barry Sanders.  Same shit.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1909 on: November 14, 2010, 04:15:31 pm »
The Lions are, and always have been, horrible.  Andre Johnson = Barry Sanders.  Same shit.

the texans are a coach and about tow players away from being pretty fucking good

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1910 on: November 14, 2010, 04:15:51 pm »
Holee SHit.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1911 on: November 14, 2010, 04:15:53 pm »
The blowout's on.  Just for you, BG.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1912 on: November 14, 2010, 04:16:05 pm »
a big giant FCUK YOU to you, Eli

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1913 on: November 14, 2010, 04:16:20 pm »
Well, I am delighted to learn that Kevin Gilbride is still a motherfucking idiot.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1914 on: November 14, 2010, 04:19:31 pm »
The blowout's on.  Just for you, BG.

they are just messing with me.  they did that the last time they played the giants.  waiting in the denver airport i board a plane thinking they were going to win and that didn't work out like i thought.

i'm glad those troops are happy.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1915 on: November 14, 2010, 04:20:00 pm »
y'all see that?  our boys overseas know what's up...

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1916 on: November 14, 2010, 04:21:28 pm »
y'all see that?  our boys overseas know what's up...

America's team baby.

ETA:  or are they douches?
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1917 on: November 14, 2010, 04:23:11 pm »
cheating on the offense, two plays in a row.  we RULE

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1918 on: November 14, 2010, 04:24:01 pm »
cheating on the offense, two plays in a row.  we RULE

Cowboys are bad asses with that 1-7 record.  Oh yeah!
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1919 on: November 14, 2010, 04:24:09 pm »
where have these fuckers been (week 3 notwithstanding)??

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1920 on: November 14, 2010, 04:24:41 pm »
where have these fuckers been (week 3 notwithstanding)

It's all about the Culture of Garrett.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1921 on: November 14, 2010, 04:25:40 pm »
It's all about the Culture of Garrett.

apparently.  sidenote, i really, really like beer

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1922 on: November 14, 2010, 05:05:30 pm »
Having watched the Giants all season, I can't say this surprises me at all.   

That being said, in about 2 hours when the Cowboys fuck this up, I can't say I'll be surprised either.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1923 on: November 14, 2010, 05:05:44 pm »
turns out they were right to try and fake a power outage to get out of the eventual ass-whooping

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1924 on: November 14, 2010, 05:06:29 pm »
Having watched the Giants all season, I can't say this surprises me at all.   

That being said, in about 2 hours when the Cowboys fuck this up, I can't say I'll be surprised either.

no way, dude.  we got them bitches on the run.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1925 on: November 14, 2010, 05:16:19 pm »
fuck.  lights go out and I am foced to watch San Fran and St Loius?  talk about cruel and unusual punishment.  are there no other games on??

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1926 on: November 14, 2010, 05:18:21 pm »
fuck.  lights go out and I am foced to watch San Fran and St Loius?  talk about cruel and unusual punishment.  are there no other games on??

the internet says no.  it's either this or arizona/seattle.  yes, I am having a conversation with myself

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1927 on: November 14, 2010, 05:19:04 pm »
fuck.  lights go out

I figured this would be you by now.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1928 on: November 14, 2010, 05:20:57 pm »
I figured this would be you by now.

yeah, i'm drunk.  this is the most fun i have had since high school.  another thing...wife is back home, I can get even more drunk, no more "pacing myself"

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1929 on: November 14, 2010, 05:23:18 pm »
could you imagine having to evacuate that many people?  what a mess.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1930 on: November 14, 2010, 05:23:33 pm »
yeah, i'm drunk.  this is the most fun i have had since high school.  another thing...wife is back home, I can get even more drunk, no more "pacing myself"

you have been fun to ready.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1931 on: November 14, 2010, 05:25:07 pm »
you have been fun to ready.

i'm always ready for some fun.  I may get my wife to drop me off at the bar later, hear it's kareeokee night

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1932 on: November 14, 2010, 05:27:48 pm »
dammit, you have no corners left and you play man to man, sepecially when the zone has been working?  fuckin a

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1933 on: November 14, 2010, 05:30:09 pm »
dammit, you have no corners left and you play man to man, sepecially when the zone has been working?  fuckin a

that was the adjustment made during 1/2 time.
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1934 on: November 14, 2010, 05:30:54 pm »
that was the adjustment made during 1/2 time.

well, coaching is our strong suit

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1935 on: November 14, 2010, 05:31:40 pm »
Dez is a supermuthafuckinstud YO

roadrunner

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2164
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1936 on: November 14, 2010, 06:19:02 pm »
Was today worse than Rosencopter?  I can't decide

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1937 on: November 14, 2010, 06:46:56 pm »
No way

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1938 on: November 14, 2010, 07:51:50 pm »
Was today worse than Rosencopter?  I can't decide

Schaub's decision to throw to Driessen was every bit as stupid as the Rosencopter.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1939 on: November 14, 2010, 08:18:30 pm »
Schaub's decision to throw to Driessen was every bit as stupid as the Rosencopter.

You know that in the interview after the game he said that had Dreesen not fumbled he thought they'd run up and spike it in anticipation of a FG attempt.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1940 on: November 14, 2010, 08:29:53 pm »
You know that in the interview after the game he said that had Dreesen not fumbled he thought they'd run up and spike it in anticipation of a FG attempt.

Fucking moron. Exactly how many downs does he think he gets?
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

JaneDoe

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 8603
  • Missing in Action
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1941 on: November 14, 2010, 09:00:57 pm »
Fucking moron. Exactly how many downs does he think he gets?

All of them.
"My hammy is a little tight. I wish I was like Ausmus. He's Jewish and isn't allowed to have a pulled hamstring."

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1942 on: November 14, 2010, 09:04:23 pm »
Was today worse than Rosencopter?  I can't decide

Rosencopter had the element of heroic stupidity that today's game lacked.  Absent that, it certainly matches up in the nofuckingwayfactor.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1943 on: November 14, 2010, 09:05:02 pm »
You know that in the interview after the game he said that had Dreesen not fumbled he thought they'd run up and spike it in anticipation of a FG attempt.

Well fuck.  I wish I never knew that.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1944 on: November 14, 2010, 09:27:38 pm »
Well fuck.  I wish I never knew that.

Wouldve been a he'll of a sight if they did it.
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

roadrunner

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2164
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1945 on: November 14, 2010, 09:33:02 pm »
So basically they would've figured out another way to lose.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1946 on: November 14, 2010, 10:58:23 pm »
Wouldve been a he'll of a sight if they did it.


Spiking the ball on fourth down would have been epic.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

matadorph

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3576
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1947 on: November 15, 2010, 02:18:45 am »
When shit like that happens, you have to wonder what's buried underground the Astrodome complex.

F'ing texans indeed.

Houston pro football is cursed.

In the curse I still believe. The shit that happened today is just too unthinkable for words. I've yet to sweep up the shards of teeth left on my living room floor. I am not sure how much more of this I can take.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1948 on: November 15, 2010, 09:34:45 am »
You know that in the interview after the game he said that had Dreesen not fumbled he thought they'd run up and spike it in anticipation of a FG attempt.

Why am I not surprised?
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1949 on: November 15, 2010, 10:06:29 am »
In reflecting on Schaub's quote I think he thought that Dreesen had gained enough yardage for the first. That's my conjecture and I'm sticking to it.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1950 on: November 15, 2010, 10:40:49 am »
Here's a little something to cheer everyone up this morning.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1951 on: November 15, 2010, 10:40:53 am »
In reflecting on Schaub's quote I think he thought that Dreesen had gained enough yardage for the first. That's my conjecture and I'm sticking to it.

Yeah, he said he thought he had gotten behind the LBs.  Whatever, I think it's another example of poor coaching.  You run a play to get your receivers by the sideline or you throw it away and settle it with the coin flip.  It doesn't even matter; the team lost the game with the first half offense.

Please explain one thing to me.  What the fuck was the team doing in the last possession of the first half?  Why do you throw the ball if it's not going to be down the field putting the team in realistic position for a field goal?  Why do you throw the ball at all and not use any of the three timeouts?  Kubiak should be fired for that shit alone.  If you want to go into half and regroup, then fucking do it.  Run the ball or kneel and let the clock run out.  Exposing your team to risk by throwing the ball with effectively zero chance of reward is idiotic.  

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1952 on: November 15, 2010, 10:53:12 am »
Please explain one thing to me.  What the fuck was the team doing in the last possession of the first half?  Why do you throw the ball if it's not going to be down the field putting the team in realistic position for a field goal?  Why do you throw the ball at all and not use any of the three timeouts?  Kubiak should be fired for that shit alone.  If you want to go into half and regroup, then fucking do it.  Run the ball or kneel and let the clock run out.  Exposing your team to risk by throwing the ball with effectively zero chance of reward is idiotic.  

The Texans have just vaulted the Rockets / NBA as "The Thing I Cannot Watch Because It Makes Me So Furious That I May Smash My TV".
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1953 on: November 15, 2010, 10:57:21 am »
Here's a little something to cheer everyone up this morning.

Hey! I didn't know you watched the Al Jazeera Sports Channel too! Wacky Walid's morning show is something else.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1954 on: November 15, 2010, 11:07:01 am »
Hey! I didn't know you watched the Al Jazeera Sports Channel too! Wacky Walid's morning show is something else.

The "Boom goes the dynamite" guy may have found his calling.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1955 on: November 15, 2010, 11:18:24 am »
Hey! I didn't know you watched the Al Jazeera Sports Channel too! Wacky Walid's morning show is something else.

It gets interesting when a match goes to sudden death.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1956 on: November 15, 2010, 02:27:11 pm »
At least the Texans didn't fall for this one...yet.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Alkie

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12195
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1957 on: November 15, 2010, 06:30:46 pm »
Here's a little something to cheer everyone up this morning.

I can't tell what happened.  Some man is screaming in Asian while clothed men have sex with each other.  This didn't make me feel better.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1958 on: November 15, 2010, 08:41:10 pm »
The eagles are going to do licentious things to the Texans.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1959 on: November 15, 2010, 08:51:03 pm »
Defense completely optional in this game.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1960 on: November 15, 2010, 09:01:58 pm »
The eagles are going to do licentious things to the Texans.

It will be amusing to watch the Texans secondary "cover" Jackson.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1961 on: November 15, 2010, 11:50:39 pm »
Where the fuck is Hudson? Should someone call the local hospitals?
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1962 on: November 16, 2010, 03:51:22 am »
Where the fuck is Hudson? Should someone call the local hospitals bars?
Up in the Air

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1963 on: November 16, 2010, 06:44:29 am »
Where the fuck is Hudson? Should someone call the local hospitals?


All I could do was laugh Sunday.  McNair's disregard for winning is well documented.  Kubiak's incompetence is legendary.  The Texans defense is comical.  Those of you who have been paying attention are finally coming around to what I've been saying for years.  The rest of you are simply hopeless.  I'm not sure what else to say.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

BizidyDizidy

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8836
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1964 on: November 16, 2010, 07:09:16 am »
I think the question of whether you should have an aggie for your head coach has been definitively answered, that's for sure.
"My doctor told me to stop having intimate dinners for four. Unless there are three other people."
  -  Orson Welles

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1965 on: November 16, 2010, 07:12:13 am »
Hey! I didn't know you watched the Al Jazeera Sports Channel too! Wacky Walid's morning show is something else.

I love watching football in foreign languages.  Reminds me of this.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1966 on: December 17, 2010, 01:11:50 pm »
"It's sort of an affirmation that we're on the right track. Clearly, we have to do better, because what we've done wasn't good enough. But we're on the right track, and I've felt that way all along."

-Bob McNair.  Yesterday.

"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

The Spleen

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1175
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1967 on: December 17, 2010, 01:20:17 pm »
"It's sort of an affirmation that we're on the right track. Clearly, we have to do better, because what we've done wasn't good enough. But we're on the right track, and I've felt that way all along."

-Adolf Hitler.  February 1945.
« Last Edit: December 17, 2010, 01:23:09 pm by The Spleen »
When the Clark is dead, Spack will eat his spleen. Before he dies, Spack will put his posts under the knife so the Clark will see his threads wiped out forever...

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1968 on: December 17, 2010, 01:20:33 pm »
"It's sort of an affirmation that we're on the right track. Clearly, we have to do better, because what we've done wasn't good enough. But we're on the right track, and I've felt that way all along."

-Bob McNair.  Yesterday.



On how he's progressed with potty-training his 45-year-old son.
Grab another Coke and let's die

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1969 on: December 17, 2010, 01:33:30 pm »
"It's sort of an affirmation that we're on the right track. Clearly, we have to do better, because what we've done wasn't good enough. But we're on the right track, and I've felt that way all along."

-Bob McNair.  Yesterday.



What's an affirmation, Bob?  That you're 5-8, and will finish worse than last year?  That's the track on which you want to be?
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Andyzipp

  • Guest
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1970 on: December 17, 2010, 01:34:38 pm »
What's an affirmation, Bob?  That you're 5-8, and will finish worse than last year?  That's the track on which you want to be?

They were 9-7 last year, so definitely will be worse.  But hey, if they finish 8-8 they'll be tied for the second best record in franchise history!!!

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1971 on: December 17, 2010, 01:36:16 pm »
They were 9-7 last year, so definitely will be worse. 

Yeah...definately.  K-mart sucks.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1972 on: December 17, 2010, 04:33:23 pm »
"It's sort of an affirmation that we're on the right track. Clearly, we have to do better, because what we've done wasn't good enough. But we're on the right track, and I've felt that way all along."

-Neville Chamberlain.  1939.


Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1973 on: December 17, 2010, 04:53:16 pm »
SFN.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1974 on: December 17, 2010, 05:15:55 pm »
I'd like to see the next public bond deal for some owner's private stadium include sliding interest rates indexed to some performance metric like winning percentage. That might give them a little incentive to do something other than simply show up in the owner's box and wave to the hoi polloi.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1975 on: December 17, 2010, 05:26:40 pm »
I'd like to see the next public bond deal for some owner's private stadium include sliding interest rates indexed to some performance metric like winning percentage. That might give them a little incentive to do something other than simply show up in the owner's box and wave to the hoi polloi.

eilT... paging Ne..
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1976 on: December 20, 2010, 09:52:47 am »
For what it's worth, a friend who has a friend working in the Texans' front office - who didn't see Ferris pass out at 31 flavors last night - said that McNair will keep the coaching staff through this year and into next, but every one of them is on a hair trigger.

Marvellous.  So instead of ditching the staff who are clearly incompetent now, he's going to let them fuck up on more draft and one more preseason just so he can fire them two games into the new season?  Brilliant!  Also, watch how the Texans will open at home to the Bengals, go 2 & 0, buying the coaches some time, and then be buried before McNair finally sacks up and cans the fucking lot of 'em.  Meanwhile, anyone worth hiring will have been hired, so the Texans will end up picking the poop out of the NFL's coaching peanuts.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1977 on: December 20, 2010, 09:59:41 am »
Heard on ESPN that Cowher might be interested in coaching the Texans.  Are you listening, McNair?
Grab another Coke and let's die

JaneDoe

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 8603
  • Missing in Action
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1978 on: December 20, 2010, 10:06:37 am »
Heard on ESPN that Cowher might be interested in coaching the Texans.  Are you listening, McNair?

Obviously, not.

"My hammy is a little tight. I wish I was like Ausmus. He's Jewish and isn't allowed to have a pulled hamstring."

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1979 on: December 20, 2010, 10:07:48 am »
Same source said he was more interested in the Giants or Dolphins.  And after yesterday, Coughlin is uber-fired.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1980 on: December 20, 2010, 10:37:05 am »
Same source said he was more interested in the Giants or Dolphins.  And after yesterday, Coughlin is uber-fired.

Impossible.  McNair says the Texans are on the right track.  Coughlin has to be getting a lifetime extension for coaching a 9-5 team then.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1981 on: December 21, 2010, 09:49:34 am »
Wonder what it's like to be a fan of a team where the owner cares if the team wins or loses?
Grab another Coke and let's die

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1982 on: December 21, 2010, 09:53:35 am »
Wonder what it's like to be a fan of a team where the owner cares if the team wins or loses?

Sucks donkey balls.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1983 on: December 27, 2010, 12:07:20 pm »
The Texans are one game away from becoming a trivia question:

"In 2010, the Houston Texans set an NFL All-Time record for the most games - 15 - in which they conceded 24 or more points.  In the one game where they held their opponent to less than 24 points, how many points did they allow?"

A:  23
B:  21
C:  14
D:  0


Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1984 on: December 27, 2010, 12:13:48 pm »
The Texans are one game away from becoming a trivia question:

"In 2010, the Houston Texans set an NFL All-Time record for the most games - 15 - in which they conceded 24 or more points.  In the one game where they held their opponent to less than 24 points, how many points did they allow?"

A:  23
B:  21
C:  14
D:  0




0

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1985 on: December 27, 2010, 12:26:43 pm »
0

Exactly.  Which is why it will be a perfect trivia question.  All they have to do is give up 24 points to the Jags on Sunday.

FWIW, they have already tied the NFL record of 14 games allowing 24+ points.  One more 24+ shitfest, and they standalone*.

* Behind the woodshed.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Astroholic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3807
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1986 on: December 27, 2010, 12:51:08 pm »
Exactly.  Which is why it will be a perfect trivia question.  All they have to do is give up 24 points to the Jags on Sunday.

FWIW, they have already tied the NFL record of 14 games allowing 24+ points.  One more 24+ shitfest, and they standalone*.

* Behind the woodshed.

Yep they are just cheeky.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1987 on: December 29, 2010, 02:13:50 pm »
Ugh

“After the Texans lost at Denver, I thought [Texans owner] Bob McNair would fire Gary Kubiak. Now I don’t. I believe Kubiak will be back,” John McClain of the Houston Chronicle wrote on Twitter Wednesday.

Peter King on Twitter Tuesday: “Was told today: ‘Don’t fire Kubiak yet. You might be wrong
.”

Yeah yeah, Peter King's famous "might," but then there is this:

NFL Network’s Jason LaCanfora: “Speaking to coaches and executives today, hearing rumblings of Wade Phillips possibly landing as coordinator in Houston with Kubiak as head coach.”
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1988 on: December 29, 2010, 03:01:03 pm »
Ugh

“After the Texans lost at Denver, I thought [Texans owner] Bob McNair would fire Gary Kubiak. Now I don’t. I believe Kubiak will be back,” John McClain of the Houston Chronicle wrote on Twitter Wednesday.

Peter King on Twitter Tuesday: “Was told today: ‘Don’t fire Kubiak yet. You might be wrong
.”

Yeah yeah, Peter King's famous "might," but then there is this:

NFL Network’s Jason LaCanfora: “Speaking to coaches and executives today, hearing rumblings of Wade Phillips possibly landing as coordinator in Houston with Kubiak as head coach.”

Ha ha ha!  unfuckingbelievable.  so crazy it just might work.  ha ha ha!!!

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1989 on: December 29, 2010, 03:05:47 pm »
To be honest, I don't like a fire Kubiak and keep Rick Smith scenario.  I'd prefer everyone goes and McNair hires a good football consultant (like it seems the 49ers are trying to do).  No idea what to make of a Wade/Kubes duo, but it sounds like clusterfucking failure.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1990 on: December 29, 2010, 03:12:41 pm »
No idea what to make of a Wade/Kubes duo, but it sounds like clusterfucking failure.

So, status quo.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1991 on: December 29, 2010, 03:16:12 pm »
To be honest, I don't like a fire Kubiak and keep Rick Smith scenario.  I'd prefer everyone goes and McNair hires a good football consultant (like it seems the 49ers are trying to do).  No idea what to make of a Wade/Kubes duo, but it sounds like clusterfucking failure.

fwiw, Cushing could be a terrifyingly good 3-4 linebacker.  Mario too.

hostros7

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7929
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1992 on: December 29, 2010, 03:35:10 pm »
fwiw, Cushing could be Clay Matthews is a terrifyingly good 3-4 linebacker. 

Fixed for second guessing/hindsight.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1993 on: December 29, 2010, 03:46:51 pm »
Fixed for second guessing/hindsight.

Cushing could be similar in the 3-4, although I would move Mario inside to DE, not play him at OLB, he would get abused in coverage.  Think of Cushing and Mario on the same side of the ball...

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1994 on: December 29, 2010, 04:04:07 pm »
NFL Network’s Jason LaCanfora: “Speaking to coaches and executives today, hearing rumblings of Wade Phillips possibly landing as coordinator in Houston with Kubiak as head coach.”

How do I do superscript on here so that I can square "suck"?
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Noe

  • Guest
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1995 on: December 29, 2010, 06:03:40 pm »
From me, the know nothing about the NFL one:

I thought Wade Phillips was considered an excellent defensive coordinator in the NFL (just not a good head coach)?

jbm

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6615
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1996 on: December 29, 2010, 07:18:42 pm »
It's not that Phillips is bad as a DC, it's just that it fails to address the core problem.  Thus, it's status quo.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1997 on: December 29, 2010, 07:23:09 pm »
From me, the know nothing about the NFL one:

I thought Wade Phillips was considered an excellent defensive coordinator in the NFL (just not a good head coach)?


that is what i thought
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

sporadic

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1954
    • View Profile
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1998 on: December 29, 2010, 08:42:14 pm »

that is what i thought

damn right, I'd have him as DC any day of the week


Rebel Jew

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3469
    • View Profile
    • Rebel Jew
Re: f'ing texans
« Reply #1999 on: December 31, 2010, 01:50:27 pm »
Cushing could be similar in the 3-4, although I would move Mario inside to DE, not play him at OLB, he would get abused in coverage.  Think of Cushing and Mario on the same side of the ball...

How is Mario any different from DeMarcus Ware?  Anyway, isn't Wade known for being a lot more flexible with his players than other 3/4 gurus like Capers and LeBeau?