Author Topic: Best players by number  (Read 4316 times)

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Best players by number
« on: May 06, 2008, 01:15:23 pm »
So SI has decided to name the best baseball players ever, by number - i.e., Babe Ruth at 3, Mantle at 7, Ted Williams at 9, etc.

Well, I didn't have to get too far in to realize that this list is crap.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2008, 01:38:06 pm »
So SI has decided to name the best baseball players ever, by number - i.e., Babe Ruth at 3, Mantle at 7, Ted Williams at 9, etc.

Well, I didn't have to get too far in to realize that this list is crap.


Who would you have put ahead of Jeter?
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

JackAstro

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3824
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2008, 01:40:18 pm »
I don't know who edited that list, but Jimmie Foxx is going to punch him in the face when he sees him.
"We live in a society of laws. Why do you think I took you to all those Police Academy movies? For fun? Well, I didn't hear anybody laughing, did you?"
Say hi on the Twitter

Andyzipp

  • Guest
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2008, 01:42:30 pm »
Jimmy Foxx

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2008, 01:42:54 pm »

Who would you have put ahead of Jeter?

Jimmie Foxx.  By a long, long ways.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Noe

  • Guest
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #5 on: May 06, 2008, 01:44:35 pm »
Jimmie Foxx, but then again, SI must know it's audience and what sells.  Derek Jeter, men 18-40 years old demographic... "who the hell is Jimmie Foxx and where is Derek Jeter's name?!?!"

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #6 on: May 06, 2008, 02:11:11 pm »
Jimmy Foxx

Even though Foxx wore #3?
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Noe

  • Guest
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #7 on: May 06, 2008, 02:20:28 pm »
Even though Foxx wore #3?

Going by what SI said:

Runner-up: Charlie Gehringer

Worthy of consideration:
Nellie Fox, Jimmie Foxx
and Red Schoendienst

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #8 on: May 06, 2008, 02:22:43 pm »
I've found other sources showing him as 3.  I also found it interesting that his number was not retired by either the A's or Red Sox.

Nellie Fox is arguable ahead of Jeter.  And overall, I just don't like Jeter.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Gizzmonic

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4588
  • Space City Carbohydrate
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #9 on: May 06, 2008, 02:25:30 pm »
Sadaharu Oh is an interesting pick, since he didn't play in MLB.  Anyone want to speculate who would be considered the best MLB player to wear number 1?
Grab another Coke and let's die

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #10 on: May 06, 2008, 02:27:01 pm »
Going by what SI said:

Runner-up: Charlie Gehringer

Worthy of consideration:
Nellie Fox, Jimmie Foxx
and Red Schoendienst


I've never heard of Jimmie Foxx wearing #2.  If he did, he didn't wear it much.  He's famous for wearing #3.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #11 on: May 06, 2008, 02:27:21 pm »
Sadaharu Oh is an interesting pick, since he didn't play in MLB.  Anyone want to speculate who would be considered the best MLB player to wear number 1?

Ozzie Smith?
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

JackAstro

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3824
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #12 on: May 06, 2008, 02:29:18 pm »
Even though Foxx wore #3?

He wore #2 with the A's, once they had them. You're completely right that he's more a #3, but it's not the only place in the list that they went with the less common number.

ETA: Sorry, he was only #2 in his last year with the A's, I think.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2008, 02:31:13 pm by JackAstro »
"We live in a society of laws. Why do you think I took you to all those Police Academy movies? For fun? Well, I didn't hear anybody laughing, did you?"
Say hi on the Twitter

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #13 on: May 06, 2008, 02:29:24 pm »
I've found other sources showing him as 3.  I also found it interesting that his number was not retired by either the A's or Red Sox.


Foxx didn't wear a number until like halfway through his career with the A's, and I guess he didn't play long enough with the Red Sox for them to consider it. 
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #14 on: May 06, 2008, 02:30:02 pm »
He wore #2 with the A's, once they had them. You're completely right that he's more a #3, but it's not the only place in the list that they went with the less common number.

No he didn't, he wore #3, his place in the batting lineup.  At least most of the time.

ETA:  OK, according to Baseball Almanac, Foxx wore #2 for two seasons.  I stand by the statement that he was a #3 though.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2008, 02:33:02 pm by HudsonHawk »
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Noe

  • Guest
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #15 on: May 06, 2008, 02:30:05 pm »
I've found other sources showing him as 3.  I also found it interesting that his number was not retired by either the A's or Red Sox.

Nellie Fox is arguable ahead of Jeter.  And overall, I just don't like Jeter.

Foxx wore #3 for most of his career with the Athletics (although his first five years, there is no record of the number he wore... perhaps because they did not have numbers).  Back then, your number coincided with your batting position.  One entire season, 1935, Foxx wore #2 with the Athletics and then went back to #3 the following year.  He wore #16 and #26 with the Cubs and #4 with the Phillies before he retired.

Andyzipp

  • Guest
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #16 on: May 06, 2008, 02:31:32 pm »
They gave Nolan credit for 30, not for 34 (which they gave to Puckett).

Also, didn't even include J.R. Richard on the list for 50 (they gave that to Matt Lawton).

Noe

  • Guest
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #17 on: May 06, 2008, 02:32:11 pm »
He wore #2 with the A's, once they had them. You're completely right that he's more a #3, but it's not the only place in the list that they went with the less common number.

ETA: Sorry, he was only #2 in his last year with the A's, I think.

1935, his second to last year with the Athletics.

JackAstro

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3824
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #18 on: May 06, 2008, 02:34:53 pm »
1935, his second to last year with the Athletics.

Fuck it, I give up.
"We live in a society of laws. Why do you think I took you to all those Police Academy movies? For fun? Well, I didn't hear anybody laughing, did you?"
Say hi on the Twitter

subnuclear

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6116
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #19 on: May 06, 2008, 02:46:01 pm »
Here is a comparison of the Charlie Gehringer (one of the best 2nd baseman of the 30s) to Derek Jeter (not amongst the best shortstops of his era) life time batting:


            AB     R     H    HR   RBI   BB     BA   OBP    SLG       
Gehringer 8860   1774  2839  184  1427  1186  .320  .404    .480
Jeter     7541   1394  2391  195   949   764  .317  .388    .460
« Last Edit: May 06, 2008, 02:48:48 pm by subnuclear »

OregonStrosFan

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12328
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #20 on: May 06, 2008, 02:58:06 pm »
Here is a comparison of the Charlie Gehringer (one of the best 2nd baseman of the 30s) to Derek Jeter (not amongst the best shortstops of his era) life time batting:


            AB     R     H    HR   RBI   BB     BA   OBP    SLG       
Gehringer 8860   1774  2839  184  1427  1186  .320  .404    .480
Jeter     7541   1394  2391  195   949   764  .317  .388    .460


But Jeters a gamer...
In the end, my dissolution with the game of baseball will not be a result of any loss of love for the game, rather from the realization that I can no longer bear the anger its supposed stewards cause to be built up in my soul. -Lee (01/08/2013)

rifraft

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1799
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #21 on: May 06, 2008, 02:59:04 pm »
Here is a comparison of the Charlie Gehringer (one of the best 2nd baseman of the 30s) to Derek Jeter (not amongst the best shortstops of his era) life time batting:


            AB     R     H    HR   RBI   BB     BA   OBP    SLG       
Gehringer 8860   1774  2839  184  1427  1186  .320  .404    .480
Jeter     7541   1394  2391  195   949   764  .317  .388    .460


But Charlie Gehringer never made a throw from deep in the hole while jumping into the air, so, Jeter wins......

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #22 on: May 06, 2008, 03:03:28 pm »
But Charlie Gehringer never made a throw from deep in the hole while jumping into the air, so, Jeter wins......

He probably never had the good fortune of a moronic base runner declining to slide into home during a playoff game, either. He probably could have made up for it by diving into the stands, but nooooo, not Charlie.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #23 on: May 06, 2008, 03:21:10 pm »
Ozzie Smith?

That's what I wondered. Why the hell were they starting at "2" and not "1"?

ETA: Oh. The link was to number 2. I'm an idiot.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

OregonStrosFan

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12328
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #24 on: May 06, 2008, 03:28:06 pm »
That's what I wondered. Why the hell were they starting at "2" and not "1"?

ETA: Oh. The link was to number 2. I'm an idiot.

In case you didn't go back beyond #1, it actually started at 0, 00, 1/8, 1...
In the end, my dissolution with the game of baseball will not be a result of any loss of love for the game, rather from the realization that I can no longer bear the anger its supposed stewards cause to be built up in my soul. -Lee (01/08/2013)

Arky Vaughan

  • Administrator
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6335
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #25 on: May 07, 2008, 12:40:25 am »
Here is a comparison of the Charlie Gehringer (one of the best 2nd baseman of the 30s) to Derek Jeter (not amongst the best shortstops of his era) life time batting:


            AB     R     H    HR   RBI   BB     BA   OBP    SLG       
Gehringer 8860   1774  2839  184  1427  1186  .320  .404    .480
Jeter     7541   1394  2391  195   949   764  .317  .388    .460


Charlie Gehringer was a great, great player, but so is Jeter. Jeter's going to finish his career as one of the best (-hitting) shortstops in baseball history.

Of course, Jeter doesn't have a nickname to compare with "The Mechanical Man."

mihoba

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6840
  • R.I.P. Mike. The boy inside you is now free.
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #26 on: May 07, 2008, 12:54:01 am »
Charlie Gehringer was a great, great player, but so is Jeter. Jeter's going to finish his career as one of the best (-hitting) shortstops in baseball history.

Of course, Jeter doesn't have a nickname to compare with "The Mechanical Man."

One of my favorite older players to study and known for his consistency as a hitter and fielder, Gehringer was given the nickname "The Mechanical Man" by Yankee pitcher Lefty Gomez.

Teammate Doc Cramer quipped: "You wind him up Opening Day and forget him."

Why does it seem like I'm always working the graveyard shift when these history threads are posted?
"Baseball is simply a better game without the DH. "

mihoba

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6840
  • R.I.P. Mike. The boy inside you is now free.
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #27 on: May 07, 2008, 12:59:04 am »
Here is a comparison of the Charlie Gehringer (one of the best 2nd baseman of the 30s,if not the best, in baseball history) to Derek Jeter (not amongst the best shortstops of his era) life time batting:

Fixed it for me.

Gehringer had a reputation as quiet and unassuming. Player-manager Mickey Cochrane joked that "Charlie says `hello' on Opening Day, `goodbye' on closing day, and in between hits .350."
"Baseball is simply a better game without the DH. "

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #28 on: May 07, 2008, 10:03:25 am »
Why does it seem like I'm always working the graveyard shift when these history threads are posted?

Because you're the man who knows...
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

Emo Oranges

  • Roster Filler
  • Posts: 109
  • The Clark Formerly Known As ColdCock
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #29 on: May 07, 2008, 10:33:49 am »
Sadaharu Oh is an interesting pick, since he didn't play in MLB.  Anyone want to speculate who would be considered the best MLB player to wear number 1?

Otis Nixon? haha

subnuclear

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6116
    • View Profile
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #30 on: May 07, 2008, 10:41:21 am »
One of my favorite older players to study and known for his consistency as a hitter and fielder, Gehringer was given the nickname "The Mechanical Man" by Yankee pitcher Lefty Gomez.

Teammate Doc Cramer quipped: "You wind him up Opening Day and forget him."

Why does it seem like I'm always working the graveyard shift when these history threads are posted?

If you have some time to kill and like hearing about pre-WWII baseball this interview with Gehringer is pretty cool:

http://www.baseballlibrary.com/baseballlibrary/excerpts/cobb_would_have_caught_it18.stm


Taras Bulba

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3988
    • View Profile
    • Wing Attack Plan R
Re: Best players by number
« Reply #31 on: May 07, 2008, 11:15:03 am »
If you have some time to kill and like hearing about pre-WWII baseball this interview with Gehringer is pretty cool:

http://www.baseballlibrary.com/baseballlibrary/excerpts/cobb_would_have_caught_it18.stm



Thanks.  I copied it to read on the plane.
Purity of Essence