McLane might howl about not getting enough value for either inflated contract.
I've never understood the logic of "you don't have many good players, so it's imperative that you get rid of the few you *do* have."
Because then you get back more players who will be good once they make the majors. Sheesh, why can't you understand that?
Wait...so for every good player I get rid of, I'll get 3 future good players in return? Being a GM is easy. I guess it's no wonder that every other GM in baseball (besides me) is an idiot, huh?