Author Topic: would you trade within the division?  (Read 3838 times)

toddthebod

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3385
    • View Profile
would you trade within the division?
« on: March 18, 2008, 04:26:35 pm »
Reports in Cincy that they are looking for a catcher and Freel might be the bait.

http://frontier.cincinnati.com/blogs/redsinsider/2008/03/rumors-mill.asp

The Astros could trade Loretta to the Orioles for whichever prospect they can get back and trade Quintero to the Reds for Freel.

Freel has a couple of advantages over Loretta.  (1) He plays the infield as well as the outfield, which makes him more valuable as a supersub.  (2) He has the ability to steal bases.  Assuming that the Astros do not keep Abercrombie on the roster, there is little speed on the bench (Cruz?  Erstad?)  Freel is also signed for 2009, which isn't a terrible thing. 
Boom!

Matt

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3578
    • View Profile
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2008, 04:39:08 pm »
Heard the Reds might trade Belisle too.

Lefty

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3539
    • View Profile
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2008, 04:41:41 pm »
Struggled last year, don't know if he was injured, but is having a great spring.  I'd have to think it'd take more than Q to get him, but trading bench guys withing the division shouldn't be a problem.  So, yeah, Q for Freel?  In a second.
You may ask yourself, "How do I work this?"

mihoba

  • Contributor
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6840
  • R.I.P. Mike. The boy inside you is now free.
    • View Profile
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2008, 04:42:44 pm »
Let's see, Freel is piss ant #3? Or is it #4? There has been so many over the years, I lose count.

He would be nice to have on the bench.
"Baseball is simply a better game without the DH. "

toddthebod

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3385
    • View Profile
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2008, 04:45:44 pm »
I'd have to think it'd take more than Q to get him

I would have thought the same as well.  But I can't see a lot of teams trading a front-line catcher for Freel.  And the article says that Freel is essentially the bait for a backup for Ross who may be injured.  So who knows.
Boom!

jonbloozy

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1077
    • View Profile
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #5 on: March 18, 2008, 10:25:05 pm »
Freel has a couple of advantages over Loretta.  (1) He plays the infield as well as the outfield, which makes him more valuable as a supersub.  (2) He has the ability to steal bases.  Assuming that the Astros do not keep Abercrombie on the roster, there is little speed on the bench (Cruz?  Erstad?)  Freel is also signed for 2009, which isn't a terrible thing. 

I still like Loretta.  If Coop makes the cuts I think he will, we will still have decent coverage for the OF.  I see Loretta spending the majority of his backup time at 2B, if need be.  Even at SS, Loretta has more experience than Freel.
I say smorgasbord!

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2008, 09:20:16 am »
this team needs pitching. forget the rest.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2008, 09:32:03 am »
this team needs pitching. forget the rest.

Agreed wholeheartedly.

I really like Loretta.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

Andyzipp

  • Guest
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #8 on: March 19, 2008, 09:33:30 am »
this team needs pitching. forget the rest.

So I don't suppose we need to ask your opinon on Quintero for Belisle...

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #9 on: March 19, 2008, 09:42:30 am »
So I don't suppose we need to ask your opinon on Quintero for Belisle...

i'd love to get him, of course. he'd love it too. Q for Belisle and ?
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Taras Bulba

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3988
    • View Profile
    • Wing Attack Plan R
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #10 on: March 19, 2008, 09:46:40 am »
i'd love to get him, of course. he'd love it too. Q for Belisle and ?

Johnny Bench.
Purity of Essence

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #11 on: March 19, 2008, 09:46:45 am »
I hear they're down on Homer Bailey.  We'll take him too.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

David in Jackson

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2465
    • View Profile
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #12 on: March 19, 2008, 10:06:24 am »
this team needs pitching. forget the rest.

I agree - I thought this thread would be about getting a starter from the Brewers.
"I literally love Justin Verlander." -- Jose Altuve

Froback

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2253
    • View Profile
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #13 on: March 19, 2008, 10:46:47 am »
I hear they're down on Homer Bailey.  We'll take him too.
Why do you tempt the animals, I mean Clarks, this way?

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #14 on: March 20, 2008, 08:08:08 am »
Heard the Reds might trade Belisle too.

who or what said Matt is available?
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Lefty

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3539
    • View Profile
You may ask yourself, "How do I work this?"

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Lefty

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3539
    • View Profile
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #17 on: March 20, 2008, 09:56:35 am »
ok, thanks. that's just some poster, not a source.

I'm an idiot, pasted the wrong link.  But you're right...there's not much if anything to this.  "Blog reader passing along a summary of a radio interview with Jeff Brantley" is a hell of a source.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/03/reds-seek-catch.html
You may ask yourself, "How do I work this?"

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #18 on: March 20, 2008, 10:34:09 am »
I'm an idiot, pasted the wrong link.  But you're right...there's not much if anything to this.  "Blog reader passing along a summary of a radio interview with Jeff Brantley" is a hell of a source.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/03/reds-seek-catch.html

wonder if they are scouting Q.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #19 on: March 20, 2008, 10:36:43 am »
If Dusty really does like Barrett, then Q is not his kind of catcher.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

pravata

  • Guest
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #20 on: March 20, 2008, 10:46:30 am »
If Dusty really does like Barrett, then Q is not his kind of catcher.

You mean sane don't you.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #21 on: March 20, 2008, 10:55:17 am »
Sane, male, and competent behind the plate.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Matt

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3578
    • View Profile
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #22 on: March 20, 2008, 12:25:17 pm »
who or what said Matt is available?

It was probably the same source that I read.  They mentioned Brantley but it was on mlbtraderumors.com.  Grain of salt and such.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: would you trade within the division?
« Reply #23 on: March 20, 2008, 01:44:33 pm »
my source says there is nothing to any of this Reds talk at the moment.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.