the real culprit is the editor; i honestly and sincerely don't think the chornicle employs any.
case in point - sunday, a guy named steve campbell wrote an article about how, if the texans were to beat the titans, it would mark only the second time in franchise history they had strung together back-to-back wins, the first coming in late september/early october of 2004.
problem is they actually did it twice more that same season. so not only did he have the last occurance wrong, the entire foundation of his article was wrong.
how in fuck's sake did that get published? campbell may indeed but a fucktard, but his editor deserves far more of our scorn.