Author Topic: Tony Watson  (Read 2281 times)

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Tony Watson
« on: February 17, 2018, 06:44:46 am »
Signing with SF. I never saw any printed interest by the Astros. Wonder why?
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Tony Watson
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2018, 03:19:11 pm »
Signing with SF. I never saw any printed interest by the Astros. Wonder why?

This article points to Mark Melancon as the reason.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Tony Watson
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2018, 09:22:32 am »
This article points to Mark Melancon as the reason.

I read he and Cole are best friends so I hoped this would help sign him. I have not seen anything, however, saying the Astros made him a contract offer.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Tony Watson
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2018, 09:41:02 am »
It is very surprising how little he got. What, $7m for two years plus a cheap player option? There must be something that teams don’t like about him. Every team in baseball could use another good LH RP, and every team could afford that. Well, maybe not the Rays. But every other team.
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

toddthebod

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3385
    • View Profile
Re: Tony Watson
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2018, 12:13:04 pm »
The Astros have Tony Sipp and Anthony Gose.  They don't need a LH reliever. 
Boom!

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Tony Watson
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2018, 03:22:29 pm »
The Astros have Tony Sipp and Anthony Gose.  They don't need a LH reliever.

Boshers looks like a better option than either of them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Tony Watson
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2018, 03:31:44 pm »
Boshers looks like a better option than either of them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not so fast, Blog Writer. They see something in Gose, and Feb 18 is a bit too soon to toss him aside.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Tony Watson
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2018, 03:35:01 pm »
Not so fast, Blog Writer. They see something in Gose, and Feb 18 is a bit too soon to toss him aside.

I’d love to be pleasantly surprised by Gose, but I think the waiver claim of Boshers shows that they saw something in him just as much as the Rule 5 claim of Gose did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Tony Watson
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2018, 06:14:30 pm »
Regardless of Gose and Boshers, it would seem that Tony Watson was much better option and was obviously available.  I'm with Jim.  There must be something more to the story. 
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Tony Watson
« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2018, 06:56:01 pm »
Regardless of Gose and Boshers, it would seem that Tony Watson was much better option and was obviously available.  I'm with Jim.  There must be something more to the story.

If the Astros offered him a contract, no one reported it.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Tony Watson
« Reply #10 on: February 18, 2018, 07:00:24 pm »
I’d love to be pleasantly surprised by Gose, but I think the waiver claim of Boshers shows that they saw something in him just as much as the Rule 5 claim of Gose did.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I believe Boshers has at least one option year left.  Gose cant be sent down with a trade.
Goin' for a bus ride.