OrangeWhoopass.com Forums

General Discussion => Talk Zone => Topic started by: BudGirl on May 30, 2006, 06:31:18 pm

Title: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: BudGirl on May 30, 2006, 06:31:18 pm
Let's assume Clemens is signed.  What is your next move to get this team hitting and pitching to win games?

Do you go for another starting pitcher?  Some power in the outfield?

Who are you willing to give up for said player?
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: BudGirl on May 30, 2006, 06:34:47 pm
I'll even start--Jason Lane and Zeke Astacio for Gary Matthews, Jr.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: MusicMan on May 30, 2006, 06:41:24 pm
I'm looking for an OF, not a SP.  In fact, I'm hoping for Backe to come back and show his health for a couple of starts, and then trying to spin him and Jimerson for an OF.

My ideal process:

1.  Clemens returns to active roster, replacing Nieve.  Nieve to the pen, Gallo DFA.
2.  Backe off DL, Buchholz to pen, Bork to AAA.
3.  Backe/Jimerson/probably another A pitcher for Torii Hunter.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: BudGirl on May 30, 2006, 06:44:03 pm
Quote:

I'm looking for an OF, not a SP.  In fact, I'm hoping for Backe to come back and show his health for a couple of starts, and then trying to spin him and Jimerson for an OF.

My ideal process:

1.  Clemens returns to active roster, replacing Nieve.  Nieve to the pen, Gallo DFA.
2.  Backe off DL, Buchholz to pen, Bork to AAA.
3.  Backe/Jimerson/probably another A pitcher for Torii Hunter.





Are you going to move Buchholz back to starter after trading for Hunter?  And are you putting Willy or Torii in CF?
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: MusicMan on May 30, 2006, 06:45:27 pm
Yep.  Hirsh is my first callup in case of injury.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: MusicMan on May 30, 2006, 06:46:43 pm
And Torii goes in CF, and whoever's hitting among Preston, Willy, Jason and Chris can man the corner spots.

I started off looking at corner OF, but other than Craig Wilson, I don't see who will be available.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: pravata on May 30, 2006, 06:59:28 pm
Quote:

And Torii goes in CF, and whoever's hitting among Preston, Willy, Jason and Chris can man the corner spots.

I started off looking at corner OF, but other than Craig Wilson, I don't see who will be available.





Carl Crawford The Link ? Also, left handed relief help Jeremy Affeldt The Link might help
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: BudGirl on May 30, 2006, 07:02:43 pm
Quote:

Quote:

And Torii goes in CF, and whoever's hitting among Preston, Willy, Jason and Chris can man the corner spots.

I started off looking at corner OF, but other than Craig Wilson, I don't see who will be available.





Carl Crawford The Link ? Also, left handed relief help Jeremy Affeldt The Link might help





Crawford could be a good fit.  Haven't looked at Affeldt to share my opinion.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: MusicMan on May 30, 2006, 07:03:54 pm
Quote:


Carl Crawford The Link ?





I'm not a Crawford fan.

Crawford, career: .289/.322/.420
Wilson, career: .265/.331/.473

Although CC does have the virtue of being lefthanded, fast, and cheap.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: BizidyDizidy on May 30, 2006, 07:08:49 pm
But Crawford never mashed in Colorado...
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: MusicMan on May 30, 2006, 07:10:14 pm
Of course... just pointing out that he's, to this point, been more hype than production.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Bench on May 30, 2006, 07:43:49 pm
Quote:

Quote:


Carl Crawford The Link ?





I'm not a Crawford fan.

Crawford, career: .289/.322/.420
Wilson, career: .265/.331/.473

Although CC does have the virtue of being lefthanded, fast, and cheap.





He might be cheap as far as his own salary goes, but prying him away from the D-Rays would be anything but cheap.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: No? in Austin on May 30, 2006, 07:57:52 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


Carl Crawford The Link ?





I'm not a Crawford fan.

Crawford, career: .289/.322/.420
Wilson, career: .265/.331/.473

Although CC does have the virtue of being lefthanded, fast, and cheap.




He might be cheap as far as his own salary goes, but prying him away from the D-Rays would be anything but cheap.




And you're dealing with the Hun on the other side as well.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: jaklewein on May 30, 2006, 09:43:41 pm
Quote:

I'll even start--Jason Lane and Zeke Astacio for Gary Matthews, Jr.




I want to see Scott get another shot before we make a deal.  He's getting ready to hit another one of his streaks in AAA.  I know he's basically 0-2 in the bigs so far, but he's the lefty power bat this lineup needs if he could just take the next step....and he costs us nothing.  Give him another 2-3 week shot, that's all I ask.

My guess is that confidence is all that's holding him back.  If he can come up and have a successful game or two out the gate....look out.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: JimR on May 31, 2006, 01:57:59 am
Scott appears disinterested in RR. i am off his bandwagon b/c i believe he is pouting and not giving maximum effort every night. i'd prefer Jimerson.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: das on May 31, 2006, 10:27:58 am
Wow.  So, do you think Jimmerson is the real deal?
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: S.P. Rodriguez on May 31, 2006, 10:33:02 am
I can't help but think 1 of the 3 young pitchers (Wandy, Buchholtz, and Nieve) weren't "auditioning" in the majors.  How many teams out there want/need young pitching?  I can think of Cincinatti, Florida, Tampa, and maybe Minnesota.  All of those teams have appealing options but too many variables (i.e. salary, yrs remaining under club control, etc...) that I haven't a clue how one would gauge equal value.  

In my dream world, Astros give up Buchholtz and Lane for Hunter.  Is that realistic?  I wouldn't know but I like that deal.  Maybe add in Burke if Minny throws in a minor leaguer.  

Jim, I've read two knocks on Jimerson: First, he can't read off-speed pitches and, second, he doesn't cover the plate very well.  I take it from your comments that this changed.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: JimR on May 31, 2006, 10:45:38 am
das: not necessarily, but he could be if he would get through his thick skull that he can make lots of money putting the ball in play.

Tom: he has made huge strides this year, and my buddy Mike Capps attributes a large part of his improvement to McEwing.
i would NOT give up Buchholz.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: EasTexAstro on May 31, 2006, 10:49:54 am
Happy B'day Tom...
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Andyzipp on May 31, 2006, 10:49:58 am
Why in the world would you want to give up Buchholz?  

And precisely which Hunter are you trying to acquire. Torii? He of the .268 .332 .448 season?
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: jaklewein on May 31, 2006, 10:55:03 am
Quote:

Scott appears disinterested in RR. i am off his bandwagon b/c i believe he is pouting and not giving maximum effort every night. i'd prefer Jimerson.




Damn it.  I hate to hear that.  I just looked at his numbers yesterday and they looked pretty good....278avg, .403obp & .534slg.  Too bad.  I hope he makes an attitude adjustment soon, otherwise that will be quite a waste of talent.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: das on May 31, 2006, 11:07:43 am
Thanks re: Jimmerson.

Besides Oswalt, Bucholz is the one other pitcher I really wanted to see when the Astros were in DC.  The flashes of brilliance portend great things IMO.  Very different than say, a Redding.

I could have done without the Pettitte performance.  No way to unsee that.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Jacksonian on May 31, 2006, 11:11:17 am
Quote:

Although CC does have the virtue of being lefthanded, fast, and cheap.




You've also just described Josh Anderson, sans MLB experience.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: S.P. Rodriguez on May 31, 2006, 11:13:15 am
OK, first, I don't want to give up Buchholtz but I was thinking value for value.  And yes, that Torii Hunter.  I'm familiar with his offensive stats.  Have you seen the guy play defense???  If Houston liked Beltran, I'd put Hunter in that class, if not higher defensively.  Not to mention he adds proven run production (90-100 rbi a year).

Personally, I like Buchholtz.  And if he can figure out what he's doing wrong when he gets shelled, and can correct it, he's going to be a beast.  

... thanks ETA
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: S.P. Rodriguez on May 31, 2006, 11:21:19 am
Quote:

Tom: he has made huge strides this year, and my buddy Mike Capps attributes a large part of his improvement to McEwing.
i would NOT give up Buchholz.





That's outstanding news.  Hopefully Jimerson gets a chance to prove you right.  McEwing?  Why does this guy get screwed over so much.  He seems to contribute everywhere he goes but no one finds room for the guy.  I realize it's a numbers game.  He seems like a player's player.

On Buchholtz, I'm not saying toss him into a deal for a marginal contributor.  But the right deal for a high impact player (and no, I don't mean a "franchise" player)?  Seriously, if we are playing this game of imaginary GM, shouldn't there be some realistic parameters to the proposals?  You aren't going to get a great player without throwing some value back at the other team.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: davek on May 31, 2006, 11:28:23 am
Quote:

not necessarily, but he could be if he would get through his thick skull that he can make lots of money putting the ball in play.




Jimerson gets a hit 49% of the time he puts the ball in play...

For reference, Berkman gets a hit 35% of the time and Pujols gets a hit 34% of the time...
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: toddthebod on May 31, 2006, 11:38:24 am
I wonder if the Marlins would be willing to trade Cabrera and what it would take to get him on the Astros.

Rumors out of Philadelphia is that the Phillies/Marlins/Yankees have a deal where Willis goes to Philly, Abreu goes to NY, and lots of prospects go to Florida.  If the Marlins are trading Willis, maybe Cabrera won't be far behind.  

I agree with those who wouldn't trade Buchholtz.  I think he's going to be a really good pitcher -- the recent blowups notwithstanding.  And I'd like to keep Hirsch.  But anyone else would be fair game for Cabrera.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: MusicMan on May 31, 2006, 11:52:51 am
Quote:

Torii? He of the .268 .332 .448 season?




Check the splits, and past years.  April was an aberration, and he's bouncing back nicely.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Andyzipp on May 31, 2006, 12:22:49 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Torii? He of the .268 .332 .448 season?




Check the splits, and past years.  April was an aberration, and he's bouncing back nicely.





How do you figure that?  His career numbers are .267 .321 .458.  Seems like he's doing what he always does.

In a full season, he's going to strike out ~100 times, walk ~30 times, hit ~24 homers and knock in ~85 RBI. (Whoever said he consistantly knocks in 90 to 100, he's only had over 80 RBI 4 times in his career.)

We already have this (offensive) player.  His name is Preston Wilson.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Froback on May 31, 2006, 01:17:15 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Torii? He of the .268 .332 .448 season?




Check the splits, and past years.  April was an aberration, and he's bouncing back nicely.




How do you figure that?  His career numbers are .267 .321 .458.  Seems like he's doing what he always does.

In a full season, he's going to strike out ~100 times, walk ~30 times, hit ~24 homers and knock in ~85 RBI. (Whoever said he consistantly knocks in 90 to 100, he's only had over 80 RBI 4 times in his career.)

We already have this (offensive) player.  His name is Preston Wilson.



But Torii is always on SportCenter, and we know that only the best players are on that show!
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: MusicMan on May 31, 2006, 01:25:55 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Torii? He of the .268 .332 .448 season?




Check the splits, and past years.  April was an aberration, and he's bouncing back nicely.




How do you figure that?  His career numbers are .267 .321 .458.  Seems like he's doing what he always does.




You're right.  I was looking at career splits instead of career totals.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: BizidyDizidy on May 31, 2006, 03:15:35 pm
Quote:

I wonder if the Marlins would be willing to trade Cabrera and what it would take to get him on the Astros.

Rumors out of Philadelphia is that the Phillies/Marlins/Yankees have a deal where Willis goes to Philly, Abreu goes to NY, and lots of prospects go to Florida.  If the Marlins are trading Willis, maybe Cabrera won't be far behind.  

I agree with those who wouldn't trade Buchholtz.  I think he's going to be a really good pitcher -- the recent blowups notwithstanding.  And I'd like to keep Hirsch.  But anyone else would be fair game for Cabrera.





What went wrong with the Abreu trade before? Didn't want to take on the money? I wouldn't mind taking NYYs spot in that.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: JimR on May 31, 2006, 03:17:34 pm
money. the deal otherwise was done, but neither wanted to pay his salary. he is on the block as we speak. they want to move him to get more ABs for Delucci.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: BizidyDizidy on May 31, 2006, 03:18:27 pm
I'm willing to kick in a 20. Anybody else?
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: S.P. Rodriguez on May 31, 2006, 05:34:51 pm
Quote:

money. the deal otherwise was done, but neither wanted to pay his salary. he is on the block as we speak. they want to move him to get more ABs for Delucci.




What's the deal with Abreu?  I've seen his stats but never seen him play beyond the Phils games against Houston.  The guy can hit.  Is his defense that bad?  Or are his offensive numbers misleading?  Is he a headcase, bad attitude, or clubhouse cancer?  Or just a valuable commodity that the Phils are willing to part with if it yields the pitching they need?
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: JimR on May 31, 2006, 06:20:57 pm
big contract. some attitude. trading a guy while he still has value for what they need.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Astroholic on May 31, 2006, 06:23:22 pm
Trade gallo for a bucket of balls (don't even need the can of corn).
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: MusicMan on May 31, 2006, 06:26:09 pm
Quote:

Trade gallo for a bucket of balls (don't even need the can of corn).




Offensive to both buckets and balls.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: astrojo on May 31, 2006, 06:28:30 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Trade gallo for a bucket of balls (don't even need the can of corn).




Offensive to both buckets and balls.





I bet the guys on the team would trade Gallo for V.D. and a round of penicillin shots.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Arky Vaughan on May 31, 2006, 07:16:59 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Trade gallo for a bucket of balls (don't even need the can of corn).




Offensive to both buckets and balls.




I bet the guys on the team would trade Gallo for V.D. and a round of penicillin shots.




I can't think of why anyone would make that trade.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Bench on May 31, 2006, 07:27:42 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Trade gallo for a bucket of balls (don't even need the can of corn).




Offensive to both buckets and balls.




I bet the guys on the team would trade Gallo for V.D. and a round of penicillin shots.




I can't think of why anyone would make that trade.




"Desparation is a stinky perfume"
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Arky Vaughan on May 31, 2006, 07:28:37 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Trade gallo for a bucket of balls (don't even need the can of corn).




Offensive to both buckets and balls.




I bet the guys on the team would trade Gallo for V.D. and a round of penicillin shots.




I can't think of why anyone would make that trade.




"Desparation is a stinky perfume"




I don't think anyone would give up any stinky perfume for him, either.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Zan on June 01, 2006, 08:12:02 am
Quote:

I'll even start--Jason Lane and Zeke Astacio for Gary Matthews, Jr.




Leaving aside Lane's pathetic average, I have my serious suspicions about any team considering Zeke worth peanuts.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: JimR on June 01, 2006, 11:10:02 am
why is that, Zan? how much have you seen him pitch?
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Reuben on June 02, 2006, 12:13:30 am
Also, what makes you think Gary Matthews' son is "worth peanuts"? He is off to a good start this year, at age 31.

Is it not too early to give up on Lane?
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Zan on June 02, 2006, 12:33:51 am
I absolutely think it's too early to give up on Lane. I never intended to imply otherwise. I think he'll be good. I wouldn't want to trade him straight up for Matthews Jr.

And I think Zeke can be a good pitcher.

I just doubt that a team with a viable shot at the playoffs will offer someone having a good season for two players who don't seem like they'd help immediately. But I could be wrong.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Astroholic on June 02, 2006, 10:01:45 am
"I absolutely think it's too early to give up on Lane. I never intended to imply otherwise. I think he'll be good."

"And I think Zeke can be a good pitcher."

Well that certainly makes me feel better.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: BudGirl on June 02, 2006, 11:53:49 am
Quote:


Is it not too early to give up on Lane?





My opinion?  No, it is not too early to give up on Lane.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Arky Vaughan on June 02, 2006, 11:54:47 am
Quote:

My opinion?  No, it is not too early to give up on Lane.




But you've always thought that.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Reuben on June 02, 2006, 12:15:18 pm
Quote:

Quote:

My opinion?  No, it is not too early to give up on Lane.




But you've always thought that.





Just the way his season has gone seems really bizarre to me- 9 homers, and a ridiculously-improved walk rate, yet the constant Mendoza struggle. I haven't been able to see any games this year, so I have no idea what to make of it. It's almost as weird as his swing.

Shouldn't he be expected to snap out of it in a big way eventually?
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Astroholic on June 02, 2006, 12:24:48 pm
One can only hope that he snaps out of it.  I am no huge fan, but then again I was not an Morgan fan. (not that that matters)
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: pravata on June 02, 2006, 12:26:12 pm
Quote:

Also, what makes you think Gary Matthews' son is "worth peanuts"? He is off to a good start this year, at age 31.

Is it not too early to give up on Lane?





Since Burke has come back from the DL, Lane has been on the bench.  He's started only 1 of the last 6 games. Garner has said the benching "is not to clear his head".  I'd say we're about a week late in noticing that they have.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: MRaup on June 02, 2006, 12:28:43 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

My opinion?  No, it is not too early to give up on Lane.




But you've always thought that.




Just the way his season has gone seems really bizarre to me- 9 homers, and a ridiculously-improved walk rate, yet the constant Mendoza struggle. I haven't been able to see any games this year, so I have no idea what to make of it. It's almost as weird as his swing.

Shouldn't he be expected to snap out of it in a big way eventually?




MLB bigwigs say that Lane's problem is he has become entirely too pull-oriented. In every bad at bat he has had this year, he is being worked away away away.
Every one of his homers has been to the left side of the ballpark, but you can't hit away pitches to the right side.
And if you're taking a pull swing on an outside soft pitch... Well, the ball won't go too far.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Reuben on June 02, 2006, 12:33:44 pm
 
Quote:

MLB bigwigs say that Lane's problem is he has become entirely too pull-oriented. In every bad at bat he has had this year, he is being worked away away away.
Every one of his homers has been to the left side of the ballpark, but you can't hit away pitches to the right side.
And if you're taking a pull swing on an outside soft pitch... Well, the ball won't go too far.  





The Hidalgo Syndrome, Doctor?
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: don_mynack on June 02, 2006, 12:34:53 pm
Lane is still a  better long term option than Wilson, at least at this point. He has shown consistent power in the past, and is showing a some this year, despite his struggles with the average.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Astroholic on June 02, 2006, 12:43:07 pm
Great post.  Thanks for adding your opinion.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Arky Vaughan on June 02, 2006, 12:47:03 pm
Quote:

Lane is still a  better long term option than Wilson, at least at this point. He has shown consistent power in the past, and is showing a some this year, despite his struggles with the average.




The problem is that Lane has yet to establish himself in a full season. And he may have played himself out of the opportunity to do so this year.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: don_mynack on June 02, 2006, 12:57:06 pm
No problemo. I'll try to keep the banality flowing.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: austro on June 02, 2006, 02:03:49 pm
Quote:


Every one of his homers has been to the left side of the ballpark, but you can't hit away pitches to the right side.





I agree with everything else, but I seem to recall a home run a couple of weeks ago where he actually went with the pitch and hit it out to right center (might have been against the stRangers).  Not that it detracts from your point...
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: Lefty on June 02, 2006, 03:07:43 pm
Quote:

I agree with everything else, but I seem to recall a home run a couple of weeks ago where he actually went with the pitch and hit it out to right center (might have been against the stRangers).  Not that it detracts from your point...



Looking at his hit chart at MMP, he has 2 hits all year to the right of dead center: single & the aforementioned dinger.

The Link
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: David in Jackson on June 02, 2006, 03:15:59 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Lane is still a  better long term option than Wilson, at least at this point. He has shown consistent power in the past, and is showing a some this year, despite his struggles with the average.




The problem is that Lane has yet to establish himself in a full season. And he may have played himself out of the opportunity to do so this year.





He's fairly old for a plyer with his experience and has now been handed an everyday job the past two seasons.  The next few months are crticial to his career, it seems to me.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: MusicMan on June 02, 2006, 03:26:48 pm
I think that you meant is career status is at critical.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: don_mynack on June 02, 2006, 03:54:17 pm
Possibly a symptom of that, uh, "unique" swing of his? Seriously, it looks like he's trying to hit himself with the bat.
Title: Re: Okay, let's play GM.
Post by: David in Jackson on June 02, 2006, 05:44:27 pm
Quote:

I think that you meant is career status is at critical.




I'd say possible turning point.