OrangeWhoopass.com Forums

General Discussion => Talk Zone => Topic started by: Limey on April 13, 2006, 06:07:34 pm

Title: Buchholz
Post by: Limey on April 13, 2006, 06:07:34 pm
Having trouble in the 5th.  How's he looking?  Making good pitches?  Flummuxed by the error?  What?
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: homer on April 13, 2006, 06:08:59 pm
Quote:

Having trouble in the 5th.  How's he looking?  Making good pitches?  Flummuxed by the error?  What?




He looks fine. Errors killed him. And, that wasn't a wild pitch... the ball went right between Munson's legs.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: Limey on April 13, 2006, 06:12:13 pm
Quote:

He looks fine. Errors killed him. And, that wasn't a wild pitch... the ball went right between Munson's legs.



Great, thanks.  Getting out of that mess with only two runs scored saved the game (assuming they can put some wood on Morris).

Kid seems to be cut from the same unflappable cloth as Oswalt (gum throwing excepted).
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: Matt on April 13, 2006, 06:14:22 pm
He got Frankenbarry to pop out in foul territory.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: jasonact on April 13, 2006, 06:15:33 pm
Springer just relieved Buckholz. What's the deal? Why didn't he go more than 3 innings? I assumed he'd go as far as possible once Backe left.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: Matt on April 13, 2006, 06:17:45 pm
Probably because he has a certain amount of work he does in between starts and he has one on Sunday.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: EasTexAstro on April 13, 2006, 06:17:48 pm
Quote:

Springer just relieved Buckholz. What's the deal? Why didn't he go more than 3 innings? I assumed he'd go as far as possible once Backe left.




Just a guess, but he came in the game off his schedule and they may want him to start again in a few days.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: Limey on April 13, 2006, 06:19:09 pm
Quote:

Springer just relieved Buckholz. What's the deal? Why didn't he go more than 3 innings? I assumed he'd go as far as possible once Backe left.



Probably keeping him available for another day, or his next start.  Oswalt will be given a lot of rope tonight, I suspect.  Not that that's usually a problem.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: pravata on April 13, 2006, 06:19:15 pm
Quote:

Springer just relieved Buckholz. What's the deal? Why didn't he go more than 3 innings? I assumed he'd go as far as possible once Backe left.




Holy Mary Mother of God and all Her wacky nephews.  Garner hates puppies and children that's why.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: Matt on April 13, 2006, 06:21:23 pm
Plus they still have Nieve as the other long reliever out of the pen if needed for game 2.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: pravata on April 13, 2006, 06:22:23 pm
Quote:

Plus they still have Nieve as the other long reliever out of the pen if needed for game 2.




Dont think so, Nieve may have to start.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: jasonact on April 13, 2006, 06:22:40 pm
Quote:

Holy Mary Mother of God and all Her wacky nephews.  Garner hates puppies and children that's why.




I have absolutely no idea what that means.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: Limey on April 13, 2006, 06:24:57 pm
Quote:

I have absolutely no idea what that means.



I think it was a visceral reaction to the question.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: homer on April 13, 2006, 06:25:51 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Holy Mary Mother of God and all Her wacky nephews.  Garner hates puppies and children that's why.




I have absolutely no idea what that means.





It means pravata is suffering from withdrawals because of 2 days of no baseball.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: edvio on April 13, 2006, 06:28:51 pm
morris has our number today. should be able to complete this game.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: JimR on April 13, 2006, 06:55:30 pm
it means quit bitching.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: CrawfordBoxes on April 13, 2006, 07:01:02 pm
Buchholz looks fine. In the 5th when they scored their runs...they were on soft pop ups that just found seams. He pitched exactly how he wanted to.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: homer on April 13, 2006, 07:42:06 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Having trouble in the 5th.  How's he looking?  Making good pitches?  Flummuxed by the error?  What?




He looks fine. Errors killed him. And, that wasn't a wild pitch... the ball went right between Munson's legs.





I got home and watched the 'wild pitch' again... wasn't exactly between his legs. Just an awful, awful play by Munson. He did a back handed peck at the ball, didn't move his body a bit. I hope shitzilla is taking notes.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: Arky Vaughan on April 13, 2006, 08:18:42 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Having trouble in the 5th.  How's he looking?  Making good pitches?  Flummuxed by the error?  What?




He looks fine. Errors killed him. And, that wasn't a wild pitch... the ball went right between Munson's legs.




I got home and watched the 'wild pitch' again... wasn't exactly between his legs. Just an awful, awful play by Munson. He did a back handed peck at the ball, didn't move his body a bit. I hope shitzilla is taking notes.




That's two posts today where the word "peck" was used to describe defense:

The Link

I'm suspecting a conspiracy.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: homer on April 13, 2006, 08:20:31 pm
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Having trouble in the 5th.  How's he looking?  Making good pitches?  Flummuxed by the error?  What?




He looks fine. Errors killed him. And, that wasn't a wild pitch... the ball went right between Munson's legs.




I got home and watched the 'wild pitch' again... wasn't exactly between his legs. Just an awful, awful play by Munson. He did a back handed peck at the ball, didn't move his body a bit. I hope shitzilla is taking notes.




That's two posts today where the word "peck" was used to describe defense:

The Link

I'm suspecting a conspiracy.




My old man called it something different when I was playing, but I thought pravata's description was perfect.
Title: Re: Buchholz
Post by: Arky Vaughan on April 13, 2006, 08:22:30 pm
Quote:

My old man called it something different when I was playing, but I thought pravata's description was perfect.




The words certainly fit the picture well.