OrangeWhoopass.com Forums

General Discussion => Talk Zone => Topic started by: jester9450 on July 09, 2013, 10:30:32 pm

Title: George Springer
Post by: jester9450 on July 09, 2013, 10:30:32 pm
Is it time to bring him up yet.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: juliogotay on July 09, 2013, 10:32:58 pm
Where would he play? This Houston OF is loaded with All-Star candidates.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: jester9450 on July 09, 2013, 10:37:46 pm
Make room for him maybe the best hitter in the hole Org.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: austro on July 09, 2013, 11:26:29 pm
We watched him tonight at RR, and he hit home runs in his first two ABs, the first a drive over the LF bullpen and the second a moon shot that landed on top of the equipment shed in CF. in his third AB he smacked a ball that wound as a triple (although it probably would have been a double against a more competent defense -- RR looked really bad on defense). He also dropped a ball in LCF after a good jump and a long run, although in his defense he was probably distracted by a too-close left-fielder.

His bat is quick, quick, quick, and he lets the ball travel deep into the zone before he pounds it. But that makes his high strikeout rate all the more surprising to me. He needs to spend more time in AAA, because I guarantee that pitchers at this level will figure out his holes and exploit them until he adjusts. There is no reason to call him up early and watch him get carved up by major league pitching. Let's see a prolonged mastery of AAA first.

But he is exciting and could be special.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: Reuben on July 09, 2013, 11:58:25 pm
Even if, long-term, he ends up as only a .250-.260 hitter in the big leagues due to his contact issues, if he's flirting with 30-30 yearly and playing great defense in CF, that's a hell of a player.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: Taras Bulba on July 10, 2013, 06:00:25 am
Reminded me of a poor man's Carlos Beltran.  But, I was drinking Diet Pepsi.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: astrosfan76 on July 10, 2013, 07:07:50 am
Reminded me of a poor man's Carlos Beltran.  But, I was drinking Diet Pepsi.

I've always felt a Mike Cameron comp is fair.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: Mr. Happy on July 10, 2013, 07:51:56 am
Even if, long-term, he ends up as only a .250-.260 hitter in the big leagues due to his contact issues, if he's flirting with 30-30 yearly and playing great defense in CF, that's a hell of a player.

if he's going to be that good, bring him up now. However, like Austro, I believe that he could benefit from seeing some more AAA pitching.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: HudsonHawk on July 10, 2013, 07:54:32 am
if he's going to be that good, bring him up now. However, like Austro, I believe that he could benefit from seeing some more AAA pitching.

If he can benefit from more AAA seasoning, why on earth would you bring him up now?
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on July 10, 2013, 08:41:13 am
If I thought that he could help the Astros win their division, I'd say bring him up now. I look forward to seeing him this September.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: Mr. Happy on July 10, 2013, 08:43:27 am
If he can benefit from more AAA seasoning, why on earth would you bring him up now?

I said that I'd prefer to give him more time in AAA. However, if they are sure that he's good enough to hit .250-.260 and flirt with 30-30 and that is his ceiling, then why prolong his stay down there? Nevertheless, if they see his ceiling as higher than that, then keep him down on the farm.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: NeilT on July 10, 2013, 08:48:51 am
If he can benefit from more AAA seasoning, why on earth would you bring him up now?

To sell tickets?
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: austro on July 10, 2013, 09:04:48 am
I said that I'd prefer to give him more time in AAA. However, if they are sure that he's good enough to hit .250-.260 and flirt with 30-30 and that is his ceiling, then why prolong his stay down there? Nevertheless, if they see his ceiling as higher than that, then keep him down on the farm.

I think his ceiling is higher than that. If he can refine his approach enough to make pitchers come into the zone against him, I think he can hit for average *and* power. But I don't know the root cause of his current high strikeout totals.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: Bench on July 10, 2013, 09:05:44 am
But I don't know the root cause of his current high strikeout totals.

Georgie be hacking.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: jbm on July 10, 2013, 09:10:54 am
Georgie be hacking.
That would be my guess also. 

I agree about the higher ceiling.  Don't know how likely he achieves it, but his ceiling is monstrous.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: Mr. Happy on July 10, 2013, 09:14:53 am
That would be my guess also. 

I agree about the higher ceiling.  Don't know how likely he achieves it, but his ceiling is monstrous.

That's really great to hear.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: Fredia on July 10, 2013, 09:16:29 am
ok why has no one mentioned hunter pence? i guess the fanbase and ownership have both changed since then
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: pots on July 10, 2013, 09:23:28 am
ok why has no one mentioned hunter pence? i guess the fanbase and ownership have both changed since then

I was about to, they both play hard but their approach at the plate, even though both have aggresive swings, are different.  Springer,  by his own words (http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20130710&content_id=53233166&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb&sid=milb), goes up there with a plan.  It certainly didn't seem like Pence!!! had a plan, just be hacking.  Plus Springer is supposedly a good center fielder. Pence!!! was a horrible right fielder.  

ETA
Oh and Springer is much faster
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: Bench on July 10, 2013, 09:24:31 am
I was about to, they both play hard but their approach at the plate, even though both have aggresive swings, are different.  Springer,  by his own words (http://www.milb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20130710&content_id=53233166&fext=.jsp&vkey=news_milb&sid=milb), goes up there with a plan.  It certainly didn't seem like Pence!!! had a plan, just be hacking.  Plus Springer is supposedly a good center fielder. Pence!!! was a horrible right fielder. 

Does Springer have googlie eyes?
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: WakePhil on July 10, 2013, 10:31:14 am
Does Springer have googlie eyes?

Does he remind you of an effette frenchman with his elbows stapled to his knees throwing bookcases uphill?

Any opportunity to reset this: http://www.spikesnstars.com/forums/index.php?topic=115593.msg467796#msg467796 (http://www.spikesnstars.com/forums/index.php?topic=115593.msg467796#msg467796)
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: Reuben on July 10, 2013, 11:39:21 am
In BA's Prospect Report email today, they noted of Springer: "Now 25 HR total, 28 SB, making case for Minor League POY award".
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: austro on July 10, 2013, 11:44:52 am
If anybody has the opportunity to go out to the Dell tonight, I encourage you to do so. (I can't make it myself.) It would be nice to have some other eyes confirm what Drew and Sphinx and I were seeing last night.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: VirtualBob on July 10, 2013, 02:26:29 pm
If anybody has the opportunity to go out to the Dell tonight, I encourage you to do so. (I can't make it myself.) It would be nice to have some other eyes confirm what Drew and Sphinx and I were seeing last night.
I am planning on it, but plans may fall through.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: JimR on July 10, 2013, 03:05:15 pm
report from my friend at Dell Diamond: "Springer is unbelievable."
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: jaklewein on July 10, 2013, 05:49:44 pm
Ok...so basically expectations should be anywhere from Matt Kemp to Mike Cameron to say...Chris Young (now with OAK)?
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: Navin R Johnson on July 10, 2013, 05:56:58 pm
or Jayson Werth?
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: jaklewein on July 10, 2013, 05:59:51 pm
or Jayson Werth?

I thought about him but wasn't sure that he was in the same class defensively.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: AstroNut on July 10, 2013, 06:14:49 pm
Went this past weekend here in New Orleans and he went yard his first two at bats...bombs.

And his speed stood out...looks like the real deal and looks ready
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: VirtualBob on July 10, 2013, 06:49:42 pm
I am planning on it, but plans may fall through.
I made it. Section 118 row 5 seat 5 if anyone else is around. Report to follow in bus ride.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: morningwood75 on July 10, 2013, 06:58:25 pm
I made it. Section 118 row 5 seat 5 if anyone else is around. Report to follow in bus ride.

Let us know about Singleton as well. Thanks!
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: VirtualBob on July 10, 2013, 08:04:17 pm
Springer looks comfortable and disciplined. 4-pitch walk in the 1st with a couple of them pretty close, and a 2-run HR in the 3rd off the top of the equipment shed above the 407 sign.

Singleton looked awful in his first AB. Two called strikes on slow curves and one weak swung at a third one. All three probably wide. Trouble with the curve?  In his defense, Richmond is a bit wild, but has a knee-buckling 74mph hook. Lots of missed bats tonight, especially by LH batters.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: VirtualBob on July 10, 2013, 08:11:21 pm
Another 3-pitch K for Singleton. Slider (looking), Curve, Curve. Swings looked better, but no contact.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: VirtualBob on July 10, 2013, 08:41:26 pm
Springer caught looking at one of this slow curves for strike 3 in the 6th. Singleton made contact, grounding out to 2B.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: juliogotay on July 10, 2013, 08:56:48 pm
Springer caught looking at one of this slow curves for strike 3 in the 6th. Singleton made contact, grounding out to 2B.


Anybody else doing anything? Villar? Who is pitching?
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: VirtualBob on July 10, 2013, 08:59:47 pm

Anybody else doing anything? Villar? Who is pitching?
Villar out of lineup.

Peacock done after 6 shutout innings and 96 pitches. FB 94-95 early but 96 several tomes in the 6th. A ?cutter? At 92-93 with movement, but often out of the zone. A ?slider? In high 80's looked good, and a ?change? Ranging from 75-83 was an out pitch against LHB. 

Stiffen on in relief.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: VirtualBob on July 10, 2013, 09:03:31 pm
Marwin is looking very good at SS. Just ended the 7th with a good play on the right side of 2B. Also had a slicing double down the line in left.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: hostros7 on July 10, 2013, 09:05:53 pm
Marwin is looking very good at SS. Just ended the 7th with a good play on the right side of 2B. Also had a slicing double down the line in left.

Still no Ronny cedeno though
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: VirtualBob on July 10, 2013, 09:37:37 pm
Still no Ronny cedeno though
Gag. Hope you just forgot the [sarc] tag.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: VirtualBob on July 10, 2013, 09:40:05 pm
Gross an with a 3-run shot to left and half the very sparse crowd heading for the exits. 5-0 Redhawks.

Marwin followed with a ringing single and Laird with a dinger to straight-away center. 7-0 good guys.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: VirtualBob on July 10, 2013, 09:46:28 pm
Back to Springer. He walked on a full count off Justin Miller in the 7th after watching strike 2. The last two were FB low in/out of the zone. He then K'd to end the 9th missing badly on strikes 2 & 3, both sliders low and away from Miller.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: matadorph on July 10, 2013, 09:47:05 pm
Springer, Castro, Lyles, Folty, Cosart, Santana, JD Martinez, Keuchel....

Thanks, Ed. Nicely done, sir.
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: hostros7 on July 10, 2013, 10:41:30 pm
Springer, Castro, Lyles, Folty, Cosart, Santana, JD Martinez, Keuchel....

Thanks, Ed. Nicely done, sir.

Singleton as well
Title: Re: George Springer
Post by: Reuben on July 10, 2013, 10:53:30 pm
Singleton as well
Villar too - the Oswalt trade, along with Wallace, who, frankly, I think has a better chance of becoming a decent MLB player than JD Martinez at this point.

Also DeShields... really, any number of guys from Wade/Heck's tenure could still potentially turn out well- Buchanan, David Martinez...