OrangeWhoopass.com Forums

General Discussion => Talk Zone => Topic started by: MusicMan on October 18, 2012, 12:44:45 pm

Title: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: MusicMan on October 18, 2012, 12:44:45 pm
Mark Berman ‏@MarkBermanFox26
Astros owner Jim Crane said he will not alter anything involving Tal's Hill in center or the train in leftfield at Minute Maid Park for 2013
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: jbm on October 18, 2012, 12:54:35 pm
For 2013?

This stuff is so stupid.  Just make a decision.  It is not some complicated problem that needs more study or focus groups.   
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Limey on October 18, 2012, 12:57:27 pm
For 2013?

This stuff is so stupid.  Just make a decision.  It is not some complicated problem that needs more study or focus groups.   


It takes time and money to take them down...
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: EasTexAstro on October 18, 2012, 01:03:59 pm

It takes time and money to take them down...

An afternoon and a couple of 12 packs of beer. Heck, maybe we could find out where Houston's dignity was buried...
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: GreatBagwellsBeard on October 18, 2012, 01:14:44 pm
I guess they did read the surveys after all.

Which is all well and good, and bully for the common man making his voice heard, but if Crane's going to lead this team by continually taking surveys, we'll have cheerleaders and Joe's Crab Shack in CF before we know it.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Ron Brand on October 18, 2012, 01:16:14 pm
I guess they did read the surveys after all.

Which is all well and good, and bully for the common man making his voice heard, but if Crane's going to lead this team by continually taking surveys, we'll have cheerleaders and Joe's Crab Shack in CF before we know it.

Tell him yes on 1 and no on 2.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: EasTexAstro on October 18, 2012, 01:18:27 pm
Tell him yes on 1 and no on 2.
I wouldn't mind most people hanging out at Joe's in CF while I watched the game.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: hostros7 on October 18, 2012, 01:55:19 pm
Deep thoughts:

Quote
John McClain ‏@McClain_on_NFL

Astros are smart not to remove Tal's Hill and the train.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Ty in Tampa on October 18, 2012, 01:56:33 pm
Deep thoughts:


Smart good, right?
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: remy on October 18, 2012, 02:13:41 pm
They should convert the train into a rocket ship.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: jwhudson on October 18, 2012, 03:10:17 pm
They should convert the train into a rocket ship.
That blasts off everytime the Astros hit a homer? 
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: JimR on October 18, 2012, 03:12:45 pm
That blasts off everytime the Astros hit a homer? 

that will be a great rocket fuel conservation measure.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Gizzmonic on October 18, 2012, 03:56:15 pm
that will be a great rocket fuel conservation measure.

Ouch
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Fredia on October 18, 2012, 04:49:45 pm
hmm will they go back to astronauts to keep the field..i know they already have a flag planted at the top
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: BUWebguy on October 19, 2012, 09:22:11 am
What's that you say? You want more market research studies? Chron reports it as less of a done deal:

Quote
The Astros are considering leaving Tal’s Hill and the left-field train intact for the 2013 season  but a final decision hasn’t been made.

Key Astros personnel are expected to converge next week to evaluate market research that sought to determine how fans felt about both items, and fan input will play a significant part in the decision. While Astros owner/chairman Jim Crane mentioned Thursday during a press conference the hill and train will remain untouched next season, the organization will likely gather behind closed doors before making an official announcement, which could come by late October.

http://blog.chron.com/ultimateastros/2012/10/18/astros-consider-keeping-tals-hill-and-the-train-for-2013/
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Ron Brand on October 19, 2012, 09:28:36 am
Can't wipe your ass without a few studies first.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: NeilT on October 19, 2012, 09:31:42 am
Reminds me of the Rockets from a few years back.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Bench on October 19, 2012, 09:46:36 am
Reminds me of the Rockets from a few years back.

What a Postoloincidence. 
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: David in Jackson on October 19, 2012, 10:33:39 am
one of the few things that hasn't been scrapped around here is one of the biggest jokes
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Fredia on October 19, 2012, 01:24:27 pm
i am just waiting for the most highly paid ball player in the league (al accept it) to run up the hill tear something and never play again..
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: HudsonHawk on October 19, 2012, 01:38:31 pm
i am just waiting for the most highly paid ball player in the league (al accept it) to run up the hill tear something and never play again..

Because this has happened with alarming frequency in the stadium's 13 year history.  The number of great NL players who had their careers ruined by that hill are too numerous to count.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Bench on October 19, 2012, 01:55:08 pm
Because this has happened with alarming frequency in the stadium's 13 year history.  The number of great NL players who had their careers ruined by that hill are too numerous to count.

I think she was rooting specifically for A-Rod to be the victim.  
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: NeilT on October 19, 2012, 02:12:31 pm
Because this has happened with alarming frequency in the stadium's 13 year history.  The number of great NL players who had their careers ruined by that hill are too numerous to count.

Only surpassed by the number of great players who suffered serious injury or death when the flagpole fell on them.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: hostros7 on October 19, 2012, 02:21:37 pm
I think she was rooting specifically for A-Rod to be the victim.  

Which makes sense because his plan is to convert to a center fielder to lengthen his career and take advantage of his speed. 
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Bench on October 19, 2012, 02:29:57 pm
Which makes sense because his plan is to convert to a center fielder to lengthen his career and take advantage of his speed. 

Now she has to make sense too?  Pffft. 
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: David in Jackson on October 19, 2012, 02:36:49 pm
Because this has happened with alarming frequency in the stadium's 13 year history.  The number of great NL players who had their careers ruined by that hill are too numerous to count.

Surpassed only by the number of ballparks across the country building hills in their OF (and the team president naming the hill for himself).
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Ty in Tampa on October 19, 2012, 05:19:17 pm
Because this has happened with alarming frequency in the stadium's 13 year history.  The number of great NL players who had their careers ruined by that hill are too numerous to count.

Watching the Messiah do a face-plant on it at the first game I saw there endeared the hill to me.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Reuben on October 19, 2012, 06:08:51 pm
Surpassed only by the number of ballparks across the country building hills in their OF (and the team president naming the hill for himself).
The fact that you, personally, don't like the hill, doesn't mean the fools claiming it needs to go because it's a major injury risk are any less wrong. Nor does the fact that it's named after Tal Smith (yeah, I'm sure he "named it for himself").

The hill is what it is. A little forced quirkiness/character? Perhaps. But to me that's better than if they just lopped it off now, making it much more hitter-friendly.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: BUWebguy on October 21, 2012, 02:27:24 pm
The hill is what it is. A little forced quirkiness/character? Perhaps. But to me that's better than if they just lopped it off now, making it much more hitter-friendly.

This. Kill the hill if you must, take out the flagpole if it concerns you, but leave the deep dimension.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Mr. Happy on October 21, 2012, 02:36:05 pm
This. Kill the hill if you must, take out the flagpole if it concerns you, but leave the deep dimension.

+1
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: HudsonHawk on October 22, 2012, 06:37:22 am
The fact that you, personally, don't like the hill, doesn't mean the fools claiming it needs to go because it's a major injury risk are any less wrong.

So please give us a rundown of the major injuries that have occurred as a result of the hill.  Also, please list the injuries that have resulted from running into a wall and compare/contrast the statistical risk associated with each.  Please show your work.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Reuben on October 22, 2012, 08:27:11 am
So please give us a rundown of the major injuries that have occurred as a result of the hill.  Also, please list the injuries that have resulted from running into a wall and compare/contrast the statistical risk associated with each.  Please show your work.
Uh, I think you're misunderstanding what I'm saying there.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: HudsonHawk on October 22, 2012, 08:31:44 am
Uh, I think you're misunderstanding what I'm saying there.

I guess so, because it read like you were saying that people who claim it's a major injury risk aren't necessarily wrong.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: subnuclear on October 22, 2012, 09:54:03 am
So please give us a rundown of the major injuries that have occurred as a result of the hill.  Also, please list the injuries that have resulted from running into a wall and compare/contrast the statistical risk associated with each.  Please show your work.

Number of regular games played in non-MMPUS stadiums: 2349
Multiply by 3 for 3 outfielders: 7047
Number of games played at MMPUS: 81
Multiply by 2 for 2 outfielders near walls at MMPUS: 162
Number of regular games played by outfielders by normal outfield walls:7209
Number of regular games played by outfielder near Tal's Hill: 81

If Tal's Hill had the same possible injury rate as an outfielder hitting a wall, then for every 89 major wall injuries you would get 1 Tal's Hill injury. There doesn't seem to be an easy place to get injury data, but if there were 10 wall injuries every year for the last 13 years that MMPUS has been open, you would expect maybe 1 Tal's Hill injury if the injury rate were equal.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Bench on October 22, 2012, 10:13:19 am
I guess so, because it read like you were saying that people who claim it's a major injury risk aren't necessarily wrong.

The fact that Reuben referred to those people as "fools" and that it does "not mean .... they are any less wrong" should have tipped you off. 
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Bench on October 22, 2012, 10:15:13 am
Number of regular games played in non-MMPUS stadiums: 2349
Multiply by 3 for 3 outfielders: 7047
Number of games played at MMPUS: 81
Multiply by 2 for 2 outfielders near walls at MMPUS: 162
Number of regular games played by outfielders by normal outfield walls:7209
Number of regular games played by outfielder near Tal's Hill: 81

If Tal's Hill had the same possible injury rate as an outfielder hitting a wall, then for every 89 major wall injuries you would get 1 Tal's Hill injury. There doesn't seem to be an easy place to get injury data, but if there were 10 wall injuries every year for the last 13 years that MMPUS has been open, you would expect maybe 1 Tal's Hill injury if the injury rate were equal.

Don't you have to normalize for park factors?  The fact that the hill is 430 feet from home should reduce the frequency that it comes into play compared to normal outfield walls.  Maybe there's a OFInj+ that can be created. 
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: HudsonHawk on October 22, 2012, 10:27:04 am
The fact that Reuben referred to those people as "fools" and that it does "not mean .... they are any less wrong" should have tipped you off.  

You would have thought, huh?  I guess it's the "don't...doesn't...less wrong"  quadruple negative thing that got me.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Reuben on October 22, 2012, 01:19:46 pm
You would have thought, huh?  I guess it's the "don't...doesn't...less wrong"  quadruple negative thing that got me.
I didn't think I hadn't never done misspoken more than I did there, but I ain't.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: Guinness on October 22, 2012, 01:36:27 pm
I didn't think I hadn't never done misspoken more than I did there, but I ain't.

I for one completely failed to avoid not misunderstanding what you meant.
Title: Re: Tal's Hill stays
Post by: subnuclear on October 22, 2012, 02:59:30 pm
Don't you have to normalize for park factors?  The fact that the hill is 430 feet from home should reduce the frequency that it comes into play compared to normal outfield walls.  Maybe there's a OFInj+ that can be created. 

There is a significant amount of heterogeneity in wall construction as well so that's a great idea.