OrangeWhoopass.com Forums

General Discussion => Archive => Game Zone 2010 Playoffs => Topic started by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 06:59:33 pm

Title: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 06:59:33 pm
I think Buckarver, when they say "redundant", actually mean "babbling irrelevance".
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Alkie on October 23, 2010, 07:10:31 pm
Sir, did you once play for, work for, or possibly root for one of the two teams playing tonight?

Do you speak English or some other language well enough to communicate a simple list?

Are you able to read off this cue card or at least stare at this cue card?

How would you like to be on FOX?
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 07:10:33 pm
McCarver thinks that less that 50% = "always". 
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 07:11:15 pm
Sir, did you once play for, work for, or possibly root for one of the two teams playing tonight?

Do you speak English or some other language well enough to communicate a simple list?

Are you able to read off this cue card or at least stare at this cue card?

How would you like to be on FOX?

That was horrible. 
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 07:12:37 pm
IT's PLACIDO POLANCO!
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Alkie on October 23, 2010, 07:13:19 pm
McCarver thinks that less that 50% = "always". 

If Tim McCarver were to lose the use of one of his senses, and could CHOOSE which sense to lose, that sense would be "oboe."


Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 07:14:25 pm
Anyone else holding their breath waiting for Timmy to connect the dots between the most walks and the best BAA?  If I disappear for 30 mins, send paramedics. 
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Alkie on October 23, 2010, 07:14:57 pm
MIZZOU TD ON THE OPENING KICKOFF!

Haha.

Fucking OU.  They suck so hard, they could lose at home to Iowa State.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Alkie on October 23, 2010, 07:16:39 pm
Anyone else holding their breath waiting for Timmy to connect the dots between the most walks and the best BAA?  If I disappear for 30 mins, send paramedics. 

I really am trying hard not to listen to him because he makes me incredibly angry.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 07:23:45 pm
Roy doesn't have to pitch a shutout.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Alkie on October 23, 2010, 07:24:56 pm
Roy doesn't have to pitch a shutout.

This must be confusing.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 07:28:30 pm
POLANCO!!!
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 07:33:30 pm
Roy doesn't have to pitch a shutout.

I hope he pitches a 2-hour gem, and leqves Fox with a ton of dead air.  Also, it's less time listening to Buckarver. 
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 07:36:00 pm
Mizzou is due to beat OU. But it wont happen this year.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 07:39:12 pm
Anyone else think that McCarver first heard the term "fall behind" in grade school?
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 07:45:44 pm
Whats funny is that on TBS Ernie Johnson and John Smoltz would be just fine together, but they can't have that. They got to have an annoyance factor so they added Ron Darling. There must have been some study from some marketing consulting firm from Boston that recommends having an annoyance factor in the booth. All the Networks adhere to it.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Alkie on October 23, 2010, 07:49:01 pm
Anyone else think that McCarver first heard the term "fall behind" in grade school?

Not possible.  He didn't make it that far.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 07:50:17 pm
I'm going to sop posting about McCarver.  Just take it as read that I disagree with anything that he says.  Thank you.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 07:50:49 pm
Maybe Roy should have had to have pitched a shutout.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 07:51:29 pm
Huff has a girl's name, and runs like one. 

Getting the Oswalt inning out of the way early tonight. 
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Alkie on October 23, 2010, 07:51:33 pm
I'm going to sop posting about McCarver.  Just take it as read that I disagree with anything that he says.  Thank you.

You didn't even make fun of his awesome math.

The Giants played 171 games this year.   The Phillies 170.  That's 241 games combined.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 07:53:16 pm
Roy knows Bourn would have caught that ball that Victorino couldn't.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 07:54:38 pm
You didn't even make fun of his awesome math.

The Giants played 171 games this year.   The Phillies 170.  That's 241 games combined.

What do you expect, he didn't even make it out of grade school.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Alkie on October 23, 2010, 07:58:05 pm
What do you expect, he didn't even make it out of grade school.

Sir, did you once play for, work for, or possibly root for one of the two teams playing tonight?

Do you speak English or some other language well enough to communicate a simple list?

Are you able to read off this cue card or at least stare at this cue card?

How would you like to be on FOX?
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 08:03:29 pm
What was so terrible about Utley tossing that ball? It's not like he was throwing a broken bat at somebody.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Alkie on October 23, 2010, 08:03:52 pm
Baylor wins.   If OU loses, Baylor is in first place.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Alkie on October 23, 2010, 08:04:11 pm
What was so terrible about Utley tossing that ball? It's not like he was throwing a broken bat at somebody.

Sanchez is a giant, flappy, drippy vagina.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 08:06:13 pm
Mizzou leads 14-7. No way they beat OU this year.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Alkie on October 23, 2010, 08:08:11 pm
Oooh, this is cool.

I get to watch UT in the inaugural Pinstripe Bowl this year.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 08:09:15 pm
The Coogs beat the Ponys. Ags lead by 21 at the half.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 08:19:20 pm
He said "bum gardener". 
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 08:20:16 pm
Hell of a catch by Werth.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 08:23:52 pm
He said "bum gardener". 

That's one thing he might know about.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 08:23:56 pm
Sanchez is a giant, flappy, drippy vagina.

With small hands, like a carnie. 
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 08:34:48 pm
That's one thing he might know about.

Please tell me his first name is "Uphill". 
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 08:37:46 pm
Oswalt pulling the sting like that always makes me laugh. 
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 08:39:41 pm
With small hands, like a carnie. 

And a zucchini suck in his rectum, like a guy with a vegetable lodged in his ass.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 08:49:22 pm
It would be pretty cool if Posey's middle name was Hymen.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 08:49:48 pm
Watching Roy pitching with intensity like this just reminds me how much I miss the Astros being in the playoffs. 
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 09:14:42 pm
Renteria < Jeter. 
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 09:22:03 pm
Francisco.  That's fun to say. 
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Alkie on October 23, 2010, 09:25:05 pm
Watching Roy pitching with intensity like this just reminds me how much I miss the Astros being in the playoffs. 

Wasn't an hour ago, we couldn't fucking believe it's been 5 years already.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 09:37:15 pm
Ags won. OU leads 21-20 in the 3rd.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 09:39:38 pm
Wow. Harry Kalas' son has some pipes. Sings like his mom was Maria Callas.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 09:55:59 pm
I wonder if the Jayhawks miss the Fat Man.

And the Giants go on top with a Uribe HR.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 10:24:50 pm
Mizzou 36 Oklahoma 21 with 6:14 left in the 4th quarter.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: OregonStrosFan on October 23, 2010, 10:31:56 pm
Hell of a game tonight.  Phillies on their last legs with 2 outs B9 runner on 1B, Utley at the dish.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 10:35:05 pm
If thevPhillies go down here, they do it with their big gunsvat the plate. 

Yes, great game.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: OregonStrosFan on October 23, 2010, 10:36:23 pm
If thevPhillies go down here, they do it with their big gunsvat the plate. 

Yes, great game.

2 on 2 outs, Howard (29 strikeouts in his last 55 playoff at-bats) at the plate.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 10:37:12 pm
Howard needs at least one RBI.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: OregonStrosFan on October 23, 2010, 10:37:54 pm
3-2 pitch. This is exciting!
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: OregonStrosFan on October 23, 2010, 10:39:15 pm
Strike 3 called. Wow!
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 10:39:25 pm
Wow. Watches strike three. Wow.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Ron Brand on October 23, 2010, 10:39:56 pm
Giants vs. Rangers. Madison Avenue is on the ledge tonight.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 10:41:12 pm
Strike 3 called. Wow!

That pitch was beyond perfection. 
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 10:41:41 pm
I can't believe he's let something that close be decided by the ump. Swing dumbass!

Oh well. Good for the Giants.

Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 10:46:29 pm
Oh yeah.  Cue the whinging from the East Coast media.  Fuck 'em,

And, yes, Howard needed to be swinging at that pitch.  Or was he expecting the guy behind him to do his job for him?
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 10:47:33 pm
And OU is beaten. All hell breaks loose in Columbia.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 10:50:31 pm
Moat pathetic post-game show / trophy presentation ev-ver. 
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: OregonStrosFan on October 23, 2010, 10:54:46 pm
The goggles are just silly...

I'm surprised that the Gnats won tonight, but don't think they can hold up against the stRangers (though I'll be rooting for them to do so...).
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on October 23, 2010, 11:01:20 pm
Moat pathetic post-game show / trophy presentation ev-ver. 

Huh, what... I nodded out.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Limey on October 23, 2010, 11:36:26 pm
Huh, what... I nodded out.

Creepy old white guys in bow ties (sorry Neil) trying to sound enthusiastic about being handed a woodshop project by an even older white guy while standing in front of a drop cloth in a barn. 
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Alkie on October 24, 2010, 07:48:13 am
Creepy old white guys in bow ties (sorry Neil) trying to sound enthusiastic about being handed a woodshop project by an even older white guy while standing in front of a drop cloth in a barn. 

The elections are next week, Limey.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: moriartp on October 27, 2010, 09:34:32 am
Fark (http://www.fark.com/cgi/comments.pl?IDLink=5717075) wins again: "Philadelphia fans attempted to slip laxatives to Giants players during the NLCS. Should have given them to the Phillies instead, they could have used the runs"

(actual story (http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/sports/Philly-Accusses-Their-Own-Fans-of-Trying-to-Sabotage-the-Giants-105789003.html))
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: OregonStrosFan on October 27, 2010, 10:01:19 am
Fark (http://www.fark.com/cgi/comments.pl?IDLink=5717075) wins again: "Philadelphia fans attempted to slip laxatives to Giants players during the NLCS. Should have given them to the Phillies instead, they could have used the runs"

(actual story (http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/sports/Philly-Accusses-Their-Own-Fans-of-Trying-to-Sabotage-the-Giants-105789003.html))

This is one (of many) reasons why I find the automatic 50-game suspension for PEDs to be troublesome (and why I generally despise WADA).  As an athlete you are deemed responsible for everything you put into your body.  What is to stop some crazed Philly fan (or any fan) working at a restaurant, etc. from spiking a players food with some prohibit chemical?  Don't get me wrong, you cheat you should get pounded.  However, you get your food spiked, you take a supplement that is spiked with banned substances (which are not included on the label, or included under a different chemical name for the same compound, e.g. Daniel Meszaros), 50 games it too steep.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: Lurch on October 27, 2010, 12:28:45 pm
This is one (of many) reasons why I find the automatic 50-game suspension for PEDs to be troublesome (and why I generally despise WADA).  As an athlete you are deemed responsible for everything you put into your body.  What is to stop some crazed Philly fan (or any fan) working at a restaurant, etc. from spiking a players food with some prohibit chemical?  Don't get me wrong, you cheat you should get pounded.  However, you get your food spiked, you take a supplement that is spiked with banned substances (which are not included on the label, or included under a different chemical name for the same compound, e.g. Daniel Meszaros), 50 games it too steep.

I'm sure "beyond a reasonable doubt" is inherent in their decision process and their lawyers likely are involved in the appeal process we don't see.  100% accurate?  Certainly not.  Enough so?  Probably.
Title: Re: NLCS Game 6
Post by: austro on October 27, 2010, 12:43:54 pm
I'm sure "beyond a reasonable doubt" is inherent in their decision process and their lawyers likely are involved in the appeal process we don't see.  100% accurate?  Certainly not.  Enough so?  Probably.

From the (few) things I've read, that's exactly the problem with WADA: their definition of reasonable doubt is such that nobody can ever satisfy it. And in one case, they even acknowledged that the guy was getting screwed, and then kept on screwing him anyway. Add to that the lack of transparency in their lab work, and there seems to be plenty of reason to worry about them.