OrangeWhoopass.com Forums

General Discussion => Beer and Queso => Topic started by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 06:41:13 pm

Title: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 06:41:13 pm
Let's fucking do this.

TEXAS!!
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: JaneDoe on December 05, 2009, 06:44:48 pm
FIGHT!!
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 06:49:19 pm
Ah, fuck it.

Hook 'em Mack.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:00:59 pm
Why.

Why did it have to be Mooseburger.

Why.

We're gonna need a lot of beer.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 07:04:02 pm
Alright, I need to get my consolation straight here before the game.  If Texas were to somehow lose this game, would TCU at least go to the title game and we'd all have an underdog to root for, or would we be subjected to Cincinnatti getting fuckstomped by Bama?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 07:04:10 pm
Ah, fuck it.

Hook 'em Mack.

Plenty of room for you

TEXAS!
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 07:05:41 pm

Why did it have to be Mooseburger.

The Texas QB is actually named "Colt"!  Oh, and have you heard about his bff Jordan?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:08:11 pm
Alright, I need to get my consolation straight here before the game.  If Texas were to somehow lose this game, would TCU at least go to the title game and we'd all have an underdog to root for, or would we be subjected to Cincinnatti getting fuckstomped by Bama?

Well, it hurt Cinci that Pitt lost it's last game, so it'll actually be tight.   I think Cinci will lose human vote points because they had to come back from down 21 to win today by a point.

Tough to say.

What will absolutely ruin my night is if we lose AND Cinci somehow ends up in the title game.

At least if we lose and it's TCU I can get behind the Frogs for the next month, no problem.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:08:43 pm
Plenty of room for you

TEXAS!

FIGHT!
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 07:11:17 pm
Well, it hurt Cinci that Pitt lost it's last game, so it'll actually be tight.   I think Cinci will lose human vote points because they had to come back from down 21 to win today by a point.

Tough to say.

What will absolutely ruin my night is if we lose AND Cinci somehow ends up in the title game.

At least if we lose and it's TCU I can get behind the Frogs for the next month, no problem.

I'll do you one worse.  What if we lose and Jesus Crybaby gets a rematch with Bama in the title game.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:12:22 pm
I'll do you one worse.  What if we lose and Jesus Crybaby gets a rematch with Bama in the title game.

I will kill you and everything in my way.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:15:06 pm
Good start.

Greg Davis passing sideways AND a chop block.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 05, 2009, 07:15:15 pm
It would really help Toby if Suh were to actually kill McCoy in this game. While I have no love for NU, my alleigances ares mixed to say the least.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:15:38 pm
Fuck my ass.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 07:16:58 pm
Fuck my ass.

what you said
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 07:18:08 pm
what you said

"this is not an explosive offense"

"this is a power offense"

mus and herb breaking out all the best euphemisms for "their offense sucks" tonight
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:19:27 pm
Nice stop.   
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: homer on December 05, 2009, 07:19:32 pm
Nebraska offense make baby Tebow cry.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 07:19:36 pm
Great job D!!
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:20:12 pm
Ain't very often you give the ball up on your 30 and don't give up points.   Good thing NU has no offense.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 07:20:31 pm
good call nebraska with a slow-developing counter run against a stacked line on 4th down
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:21:27 pm
God.
Dammit.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 07:21:41 pm
what the fuck???
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: SaltyParker on December 05, 2009, 07:22:34 pm
I had no idea they could reconsider the spot.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:22:53 pm
This game is already pissing me off.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:26:14 pm
Keys To The Next Drive:

1) Less dumb shit.
2) More forward progress.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:30:05 pm
Keys To The Next Drive:

1) Less dumb shit.
2) More forward progress.

Fail.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 07:30:12 pm
Keys To The Next Drive:

1) Less dumb shit.
2) More forward progress.

Greg Davis' brain:

Note to self:  More sideways passes
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:31:07 pm
Greg Davis' brain:

Note to self:  More sideways passes

Please don't make me kill again.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:34:16 pm
Oh, it looks like the fellows in orange can play some defense too.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 07:35:36 pm
holy shit, did nebraska really have an 8 turnover game against iowa state?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:36:22 pm
You have got to be shitting me Pyle.

What is this happy horseshit?

Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:36:57 pm
YES, Kirk, they know what's coming because Greg Davis is our OC.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:37:48 pm
Hey, you know who's not winning the Heisman?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 07:38:25 pm
I went to get some 'cue and Deschutes Black Butte Porter and I get back just in time to see Colt throw his second INT. What is going on here?

No worries, Orangebloods. I sense an Earl Thomas coming.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 07:39:38 pm
Hey, you know who's not winning the Heisman?

Yep.  Shouldn't have anyway.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:39:54 pm
Even if that happens, I suddenly have this horrible feeling.

I've seen this movie before.

I just stepped on a flaming bag on my porch and end up with hot Greg Davis all over my brand new shoes.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 07:40:19 pm

No worries, Orangebloods. I sense an Earl Thomas coming.

i'm assuming that "an earl thomas" is something performed by or performed on the girl in your avatar
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:41:11 pm
i'm assuming that "an earl thomas" is something performed by or performed on the girl in your avatar

Yes, the Earl Thomas is getting it when you least expect it and the Greg Davis is getting it from behind.   Otherwise, the same move.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:44:46 pm
Oh, THIS is what it looks like when you step on your own dick.

I see now.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:45:40 pm
This is fucking embarrassing.

HEY!   We get to play Florida after all!
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 07:46:52 pm
Relax.  We've seen about 6 of these this year.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 07:46:53 pm
i got a brilliant idea.  why don't you fucking RUN THE BALL???
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 07:47:35 pm
i got a brilliant idea.  why don't you fucking RUN THE BALL???

First game this year for you Joey?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:48:14 pm
Relax.  We've seen about 6 of these this year.

Yeah, but usually (except OU) against teams we had no business doing it against.   So you knew we'd find a way out of it, usually with superior talent.

I'm not saying that won't happen here; in fact, I think that's what will happen.   But we look totally lost.   Does Greg watch tape?  What DOES he do all week?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 07:48:15 pm

Hey, here's an idea: throw the fucking ball down the fucking field. These pussy-ass wide-receiver sreens drive me nuts.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 07:49:47 pm
Yeah, but usually (except OU) against teams we had no business doing it against.   So you knew we'd find a way out of it, usually with superior talent.

I'm not saying that won't happen here; in fact, I think that's what will happen.   But we look totally lost.   Does Greg watch tape?  What DOES he do all week?

I don't buy into the Greg Davis bashing.  What he does works... eventually.  I think they're learning the D and will capitalize on it later.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:50:05 pm
Run the ball?   Throw downfield?

Ain'tchooboys never watched a Greg Davis first half game plan?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:50:45 pm
I don't buy into the Greg Davis bashing.  What he does works... eventually.  I think they're learning the D and will capitalize on it later.

What he does works because eventually the superior talent takes over.   If what he did worked, the shit he drew up to START a game wouldn't leave us in holes against Wyoming and Nebraska.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:53:31 pm
I don't know how you can see 15 yards of offense in a quarter and say our OC has a fucking clue.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:54:19 pm
Oh THAT run the ball.   Like on the ground.

Gotcha.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:56:20 pm
What a shitfest of a quarter.

Nice game plan, Greg.   Way to plan for a defense that you knew was awesome and that has 12 games of tape on file.   You are an anus mime. 
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 07:57:04 pm
I don't know how you can see 15 yards of offense in a quarter and say our OC has a fucking clue.

That is complete BS and you know it.  The TALENT had a bit to do with that too.  Don't be that guy.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 07:58:27 pm
That is complete BS and you know it.  The TALENT had a bit to do with that too.  Don't be that guy.

Ok, wait a second.

I am overreacting, yes, but I think you're giving too much credit to a man who had an entire season of film to watch on NU.   I get that he didn't throw the INTs and the players have to play, but do we look prepared to you?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 07:59:48 pm
Ok, wait a second.

I am overreacting, yes, but I think you're giving too much credit to a man who had an entire season of film to watch on NU.   I get that he didn't throw the INTs and the players have to play, but do we look prepared to you?

I've not seen nearly enough to begin suggesting the OC has no clue.  And neither have you.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 07:59:52 pm
fuck
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:00:05 pm
Good.   It gets even better.

I HATE THAT GODDAMN RUGBY STYLE MOTHERFUCKING PUNT.

PULL YOUR HEADS OUT OF YOUR ASSES.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 08:00:37 pm
yay
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:01:08 pm
I like defense as much as anyone.   Really.

This is the ugliest game I've ever seen.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Outlawscotty on December 05, 2009, 08:01:19 pm
Couldn't even punt for a first down?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:01:42 pm
I've not seen nearly enough to begin suggesting the OC has no clue.  And neither have you.

Which I freely admit.   Again, in case we've just met, I use a bit of hyperbole in my posts.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:04:18 pm
Empty backfield on 3rd and 2.

I'm speechless.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: SaltyParker on December 05, 2009, 08:05:51 pm
Empty backfield on 3rd and 2.

I'm speechless.
It's not just this season, I have seen this shit for too many years. Davis sucks.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 08:05:59 pm
by the way, if anybody here has money.  bet the fuck out of your money on houston alexander to knock out kimbo slice in about an hour.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:07:29 pm
Yeah, Davis is great.

What was I thinking.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 05, 2009, 08:09:14 pm
And for Garrett Gilbert, Opportunity Knocks!

Fuck.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 08:09:29 pm
Yeah, Davis is great.

What was I thinking.


14 points will win this game for Texas.  Nebraska needs turnovers and field position to score.  RUN THE BALL.  EVERY.  DOWN.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:09:49 pm
It's not just this season, I have seen this shit for too many years. Davis sucks.

Here's a little quote I just wrote myself.

Only 3 things can happen when you pass the ball and 2 of them are bad.

On 3rd and fucking nothing, you don't EMPTY THE GODDAMN BACKFIELD EVEN IF YOU ARE ACTUALLY THROWING THE BALL BECAUSE THEN THE OTHER TEAM KNOWS YOU'RE PASSING AND THEY COVER EVERYONE AND YOU HAVE TO PUNT, YOU FUCKING TWAT.   AAAAAARRRRRRRGH.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 05, 2009, 08:10:41 pm
And there were only three receivers downfield.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:11:15 pm
And there were only three receivers downfield.

Awesome.

I feel much better.

Thanks.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 08:11:31 pm
Here's a little quote I just wrote myself.

Only 3 things can happen when you pass the ball and 2 of them are bad.

On 3rd and fucking nothing, you don't EMPTY THE GODDAMN BACKFIELD EVEN IF YOU ARE ACTUALLY THROWING THE BALL BECAUSE THEN THE OTHER TEAM KNOWS YOU'RE PASSING AND THEY COVER EVERYONE AND YOU HAVE TO PUNT, YOU FUCKING TWAT.   AAAAAARRRRRRRGH.

Unless you're running Colt.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:14:09 pm
Unless you're running Colt.

Yeah, because that would have surprised the hell out of the blackshirts who....what's that?   They did, in fact tackle Colt for a loss when he basically had to take off running?

Crap.

Look, I take your point, but that's NOT what the play was.   We emptied the backfield, held up our index finger to the catcher and screamed "FASTBALL, MIDDLE IN" and then actually THREW a fastball, middle in.   
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Outlawscotty on December 05, 2009, 08:14:56 pm
Best field position of the game
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 08:15:26 pm
Yeah, because that would have surprised the hell out of the blackshirts who....what's that?   They did, in fact tackle Colt for a loss when he basically had to take off running?

Crap.

Look, I take your point, but that's NOT what the play was.   We emptied the backfield, held up our index finger to the catcher and screamed "FASTBALL, MIDDLE IN" and then actually THREW a fastball, middle in.   

God damnit.  Pay attention if you're going to be an asshat.  They emptied the backfield and Nebraska had to call a time out.  THEY CHANGED FUCKING PLAYS and brought in a RB!  Yes the play failed, but youre now mixing the previous playcall with the subsiquent outcome.  Christ.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 08:16:17 pm
Jesus, Davis!  Why run the ball??!  FUCK!!!
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 08:17:13 pm
Jesus, Davis!  Why run the ball??!  FUCK!!!

run it again.  run it again.  run it again. run it again.  p
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:17:53 pm
God damnit.  Pay attention if you're going to be an asshat.  They emptied the backfield and Nebraska had to call a time out.  THEY CHANGED FUCKING PLAYS and brought in a RB!  Yes the play failed, but youre now mixing the previous playcall with the subsiquent outcome.  Christ.

I will continue to be an asshat.   You can't stop me.

If you're happy with the offensive direction of this team, cool.   But you've got a difficult time of convincing some of the rest of us that we couldn't do a whole lot better with our offensive game calling.   The worst thing that ever happened was Greg Davis was handed the keys to a 2005 Vincent and won the OC of the Year award.   
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 08:18:32 pm
I will continue to be an asshat.   You can't stop me.

If you're happy with the offensive direction of this team, cool.   But you've got a difficult time of convincing some of the rest of us that we couldn't do a whole lot better with our offensive game calling.   The worst thing that ever happened was Greg Davis was handed the keys to a 2005 Vincent and won the OC of the Year award.   

Let's talk when we FUCKING LOSE A GAME!
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:19:52 pm
Jesus, Davis!  Why run the ball??!  FUCK!!!

See, here's the difference.

If you call plays that you execute and the other team just stops you, hey, you at least you had a plan.

Passing sideways and running predictable junior high shit at Nebraska isn't good planning.

I can't believe we're still having this discussion.   We have more turnovers than first downs, haven't scored, and you want us to feel good about this?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 05, 2009, 08:20:33 pm
Remember when I said no one knew how good this team was and you may nbe thebest team in the nation by a wide maegin? I was half right.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:20:56 pm
Let's talk when we FUCKING LOSE A GAME!

So wait.

Really.

You're telling me that team management is fine as long as they plan for the 2nd half?   I totally agree, the W is the most important thing and in the end, that's what matters, but you don't think it would make things a lot easier if we didn't put ourselves in holes to far inferior teams all season long?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 08:21:49 pm
See, here's the difference.

If you call plays that you execute and the other team just stops you, hey, you at least you had a plan.

Passing sideways and running predictable junior high shit at Nebraska isn't good planning.

I can't believe we're still having this discussion.   We have more turnovers than first downs, haven't scored, and you want us to feel good about this?

Sorry, I'll be more clear in my sarcasm next time for you.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:22:11 pm
Well at least Muschamp can bother coaching an entire 60 minutes.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:22:44 pm
Sorry, I'll be more clear in my sarcasm next time for you.

No, I caught your sarcasm.   That's what I was responding to.

You were sarcastically making fun of us and I was responding to that.  I totally got you.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 08:22:58 pm
We have more turnovers than first downs, haven't scored, and you want us to feel good about this?

I've seen this episode before, but I won't spoil the surprise for you.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:23:49 pm
I've seen this episode before, but I won't spoil the surprise for you.

No, no, I agree.  I agree.

Like I said.  I think we'll win the game too.

I find the first half slapdickery maddening.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:24:45 pm
Wow.

That was our 2nd 3rd down conversion of the night?

Wow.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 08:24:55 pm
Run the ball every goddamned down.  NEbraska will not win this game unless Texas fucks it up.  14 points will do it.  turnovers will lose.  texas can play nebraska's game and win. 
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:25:37 pm
Suh is even better than advertised.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:26:06 pm
Hell of a catch.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 08:27:39 pm
So wait.

Really.

You're telling me that team management is fine as long as they plan for the 2nd half?   I totally agree, the W is the most important thing and in the end, that's what matters, but you don't think it would make things a lot easier if we didn't put ourselves in holes to far inferior teams all season long?

I can't believe you think YOU are a better judge of OC talent than The University of Texas and Mack Brown.  And that YOU somehow know what preparation went into this game and/or what they're looking at upstairs leading them to call the plays they do.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: SaltyParker on December 05, 2009, 08:28:33 pm
Well, lets see if they can pound it in here from the 2
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:29:12 pm
I can't believe you think YOU are a better judge of OC talent than The University of Texas and Mack Brown.  And that YOU somehow know what preparation went into this game and/or what they're looking at upstairs leading them to call the plays they do.

Is this conversation for real?

Dude.  

This is a fake conversation on an anonymous forum site at 8:30pm on a Saturday night.

Of COURSE I think Mack and Dodds are better judges of this shit than I.   That's why I'm sitting on a couch in my underwear, unshaven and those guys are in a big stadium in Dallas.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:30:03 pm
Thank.
God.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 05, 2009, 08:30:28 pm
Put some clothes on for gods sake
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 08:30:55 pm
No, no, I agree.  I agree.

Like I said.  I think we'll win the game too.

I find the first half slapdickery maddening.

And I admit, I dont have any more insight into this than anyone else, but I think there is a method to their playcalling madness.  Though they certainly WANT to execute the plays better, they're finding value in what you see as a failure.  The results seem to suggest that being the case.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:31:17 pm
Put some clothes on for gods sake

I stand for defense and decloth for wins.   You've got 30+ minutes of football to go.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:32:04 pm
And I admit, I dont have any more insight into this than anyone else, but I think there is a method to their playcalling madness.  Though they certainly WANT to execute the plays better, they're finding value in what you see as a failure.  The results seem to suggest that being the case.

Duh.

That's why I can't believe you're actually explaining this to me as if, by chance, I don't understand that.   
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:32:38 pm
We're winning.

Fuck is everyone so worried about?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:36:06 pm
Man, I gotta say.   NU's offense is actually even worse than I imagined.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:36:49 pm
Cal just got rolled in Seattle.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 08:37:17 pm
Man, I gotta say.   NU's offense is actually even worse than I imagined.

maybe they make some big change at halftime, but i don't see how they score any more offensive point they way they're going.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:41:52 pm
Boy, good thing we don't need style points tonight, huh?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 08:42:37 pm
Man, Colt is running for his life out there tonight. Those Husker linemen, especially Suh, are totally dominating the line of scrimmage.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:43:28 pm
Man, Colt is running for his life out there tonight. Those Husker lineman, especially Suh, are totally dominating the line of scrimmage.

That guy isn't human.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:44:46 pm
Every single time they show Tebow crying, I wonder....does Jesus hate Tim Tebow? 
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 08:50:32 pm
Every single time they show Tebow crying, I wonder....does Jesus hate Tim Tebow? 

if jesus is half the magnificent bastard i think he is, then yes.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 08:54:00 pm
So who else went "oh fucking no!" when Pitt bobbled the extra point with 1+whatever to go?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 08:54:58 pm
So who else went "oh fucking no!" when Pitt bobbled the extra point with 1+whatever to go?

Non-issue
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 08:55:57 pm
So, if I use Axe Body Cum, I will wake up on a couch, outside, with marker on my face, and blood on my pants (possibly mine).

Wow.   Where do I sign up for a product like that?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 05, 2009, 08:56:12 pm
Cal just got rolled in Seattle.

And Arizona beat SC. I am hoping we sneak into the Holiday Bowl and I can avoid El Paso altogether.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 08:58:13 pm
Too bad for Molly it wasn't a lineman competition
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 08:59:43 pm
Non-issue

Well, I'm hoping that TCU will get a chance to prove themselves against first-rate competition. If Cincy leapfrogs them because of a 1-point win against very suspect competition, I'll be disappointed.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:00:04 pm
And Arizona beat SC. I am hoping we sneak into the Holiday Bowl and I can avoid El Paso altogether.

W:  Biz
L:  U of A
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:00:20 pm
Too bad for Molly it wasn't a lineman competition

No fucking doubt.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:01:00 pm
Well, I'm hoping that TCU will get a chance to prove themselves against first-rate competition. If Cincy leapfrogs them because of a 1-point win against very suspect competition, I'll be disappointed.

I hope TCU gets either Boise in the Fiesta, even though it means not playing a BCS school or I hope they get Florida.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: subnuclear on December 05, 2009, 09:01:26 pm
Is there a tax reason companies give away scholarships instead of just cash?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 09:01:58 pm
Elvis.  MJ.  Richard Pryor ... and Howard Stern?  Fail.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 09:03:13 pm
Well, I'm hoping that TCU will get a chance to prove themselves against first-rate competition. If Cincy leapfrogs them because of a 1-point win against very suspect competition, I'll be disappointed.

Ah, then I agree.  Thought you were concerned about Texas.  The comps will have Cincinnati as 2nd tomorrow
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 05, 2009, 09:03:41 pm
Is there a tax reason companies give away scholarships instead of just cash?

I don't know the tax treatment, but a scholarship probably looks better from a PR stanpoint (Dr. Pepper loves higher education!!).
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 09:04:20 pm
Is there a tax reason companies give away scholarships instead of just cash?

I'm guessing it's more about time value of money.  It's probably paid as its used.

ETA:  Or, if its used
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:05:01 pm
CBS is projecting U of A in the Holiday and the Cardinal gets fucked into the Murder Capital Bowl.

The worst night of the year, growing up in El Paso and partying in Juarez, was the first night the Sun Bowl teams showed up in town.   All the players would come across and show up in our bars, acting like they owned the place, screaming in English and demanding Mexican bar owners do them favors like they were in a resort town.

It was hilarious watching them try to talk their way out of fights and jail and lose out to us high schoolers with the women.

I'm telling you this because the worst team was Michigan State.   The second worse was Stanford.   Those guys were out of control dicks and should have all spent a night in a Mexican jail.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 09:05:54 pm
Too bad for Molly it wasn't a lineman competition

In which case my money would've been on Dana Jacobson.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: subnuclear on December 05, 2009, 09:06:10 pm
I don't know the tax treatment, but a scholarship probably looks better from a PR stanpoint (Dr. Pepper loves higher education!!).

I'm starting to think its to target a specific demographic.  I dunno.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 05, 2009, 09:06:38 pm
CBS is projecting U of A in the Holiday and the Cardinal gets fucked into the Murder Capital Bowl.

The worst night of the year, growing up in El Paso and partying in Juarez, was the first night the Sun Bowl teams showed up in town.   All the players would come across and show up in our bars, acting like they owned the place, screaming in English and demanding Mexican bar owners do them favors like they were in a resort town.

It was hilarious watching them try to talk their way out of fights and jail and lose out to us high schoolers with the women.

I'm telling you this because the worst team was Michigan State.   The second worse was Stanford.   Those guys were out of control dicks and should have all spent a night in a Mexican jail.

Wow, that paired with watching our woeful defense against Texas Tech sounds GREAT! Much better than seeing our O (who no-one has been able to slow down) vs. Nebraska in the Holiday.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 09:07:46 pm
Ah, then I agree.  Thought you were concerned about Texas.  The comps will have Cincinnati as 2nd tomorrow

Texas has their fate in their own hands. Either they fuck it up or they don't. TCU just has to sit back and watch how things shake out.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 09:09:50 pm
Think the QB just called his own number?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 09:12:43 pm
Texas has their fate in their own hands. Either they fuck it up or they don't. TCU just has to sit back and watch how things shake out.

Texas will lose this game when a guy named "Farouk" gets elected governor.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 05, 2009, 09:15:21 pm
Wow. Suh is good.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 09:16:11 pm
Wow. Suh is good.

Yup. He's pretty remarkable.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 09:17:53 pm
Imagine how good Mario Williams would be with Suh at DT.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chuck on December 05, 2009, 09:18:34 pm
Man, I gotta say.   NU's offense is actually even worse than I imagined.

And UT's?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 05, 2009, 09:19:04 pm
Imagine how good Mario Williams would be with Suh at DT.

I was just thinking the Texans needed to spend a pick or two on DL.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chuck on December 05, 2009, 09:20:11 pm
I was just thinking the Texans needed to spend a pick or two on DL.

Right, try something new.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: TheWizard on December 05, 2009, 09:22:01 pm
If Texas wins this game, the Tide would roll all over them if they played like this again.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 09:22:08 pm
Lemme guess.  Cody Green is a running QB.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:22:18 pm
Well, we WERE in FG range.

Assholes.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:22:56 pm
And UT's?

Depends.  Who we playing?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:23:09 pm
If Texas wins this game, the Tide would roll all over them if they played like this again.

Ya think?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 05, 2009, 09:23:37 pm
This game is like what would happen if an unstoppable retard met an immoveable retard.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 09:26:06 pm
kimbo-houston alexander about to get started on spike
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: TheWizard on December 05, 2009, 09:27:42 pm
This game is like what would happen if an unstoppable retard met an immoveable retard.
What happens?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 05, 2009, 09:28:23 pm
What happens?
[/quote

20 million people get bored.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:29:07 pm
So, just curious, when do we get to see the offensive adjustments?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chuck on December 05, 2009, 09:31:23 pm
So, just curious, when do we get to see the offensive adjustments?

Adjustments? What are you talking about? UT has the lead.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:31:52 pm
Adjustments? What are you talking about? UT has the lead.

Ah.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: TheWizard on December 05, 2009, 09:32:35 pm
It'll be interesting to see if UT barely wins this game in ugly fashion - if they get jumped by another team in the BCS...
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:32:45 pm
I wonder if Alabama, who is watching this right now, is already printing tshirts and hiring jewelers.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:33:07 pm
It'll be interesting to see if UT barely wins this game - if they get jumped by another team in the BCS...

Won't happen.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 09:34:04 pm
kimbo-houston alexander about to get started on spike

JESUS TAPDANCING TEBOW!   nebraska-ut has broken out in the octagon.  boring as shit.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:34:28 pm
MEMO TO NEBRASKA:

There is no rule that says you can't punt on 1st down.   If these "drives" are just to kill the clock, you might want to consider that you are losing.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 09:35:02 pm
It'll be interesting to see if UT barely wins this game in ugly fashion - if they get jumped by another team in the BCS...

Computers don't care and voters dont read fan forums.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chuck on December 05, 2009, 09:35:27 pm
UT's winning the field position battle.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: TheWizard on December 05, 2009, 09:35:44 pm
Won't happen.
I doubt it too, just thinking out loud. I think the only way it could have happened is if FL didn't lose big.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 09:40:04 pm
JESUS TAPDANCING TEBOW!   nebraska-ut has broken out in the octagon.  boring as shit.

well, that one dude I've kinda heard of just started beating the shit outta the other one I've never heard of.

Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:40:21 pm
Mount Cody may not sleep for a month after watching this game.

With excitement, I mean.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:40:49 pm
well, that one dude I've kinda heard of just started beating the shit outta the other one I've never heard of.

How much money am I winning?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 09:41:38 pm
Mount Cody may not sleep for a month after watching this game.

With excitement, I mean.

Chicks did the longball
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:42:39 pm
Uh oh.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 09:45:17 pm
UT's winning the field position battle.

Yeah, until they put their kick "coverage" team on the field.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 09:48:15 pm
An Earl Thomas sighting
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 09:48:18 pm
well, that one dude I've kinda heard of just started beating the shit outta the other one I've never heard of.



and it's kimbo by a beard hair.  that was a terrible horrible awful fight.  this nebraska ut shit really is contagious.  you have two guys who previously demonstrated one fighting move-- come right at the other guy and hit him as hard as you can, and yet we still end up with a bunch of punts and dick-stepping.  texas just needs to hurry up and lose so that a real man (tcu) can step up and start kicking ass.  fuck this.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:52:41 pm
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 09:52:50 pm
FUCK!!!
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 09:53:05 pm
Catch the fucking ball!!!!!
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chuck on December 05, 2009, 09:53:42 pm
OK, let me get this straight. The roll out to the left has not worked once this season because Colt cannot throw accurately while running to his left. I'm meant to believe that this is a cunning setup for some future glory?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 09:54:59 pm
OK, let me get this straight. The roll out to the left has not worked once this season because Colt cannot throw accurately while running to his left. I'm meant to believe that this is a cunning setup for some future glory?

I'm calling it right here.  Game winning play in the NC.  Book it.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 09:55:03 pm
Could this get much uglier?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:55:32 pm
OK, let me get this straight. The roll out to the left has not worked once this season because Colt cannot throw accurately while running to his left. I'm meant to believe that this is a cunning setup for some future glory?

We're using it to see their hand.   Then, in February, BLAMMO.   Right in the kisser.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:56:02 pm
And now.

We are fucked.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 09:56:09 pm
I'm calling it right here.  Game winning play in the NC.  Book it.

you might be right.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 05, 2009, 09:56:17 pm
Ruh ro.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 09:56:30 pm
Hunter Lawrence must be a Kimbo Slice fan.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 09:56:37 pm
And there is your Achilles heel. Shit.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 09:56:56 pm
you might be right.

I think Cincy runs that play
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:58:05 pm
This small-possession game thing scares the shit out of me. 

FG here and it's back to 1 pt.

I don't like this at all.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 09:58:48 pm
This small-possession game thing scares the shit out of me. 

FG here and it's back to 1 pt.

I don't like this at all.

I hope it's only a FG.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 09:59:20 pm
I hope it's only a FG.

If it's a TD, we are proper fucked.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 09:59:24 pm
Damn, how do you drop that ball?!  Ugh, please don't let that be this seasons Gideon play
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:01:07 pm
You are SO lucky.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:01:54 pm
GODDAMMNIT, HORNS.

ENOUGH FUCKING AROUND.

Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 10:01:58 pm
Man, that was the play.  A&M scored several times on that, no?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 10:02:41 pm
Well, this is about 11 weeks in a row where my picks are rolling over. Fuck you, Taras.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 10:04:18 pm
Lost in all the frustration and face-punching is the fact that Hunter Lawrence made a game-saving play on that return.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:04:23 pm
You.
Fucking.
Dumbshit.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 10:04:28 pm
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 10:04:42 pm
You have got to be fucking kidding me.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chuck on December 05, 2009, 10:05:48 pm
Wow, what a fucked up call. We're about to see what the Horns have.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:05:59 pm
So, after we DO lose, you admit Greg Davis is the least competent OC at a Top 25 school, right?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 10:06:25 pm
Lost in all the frustration and face-punching is the fact that Hunter Lawrence made a game-saving play on that return.

Good call.  Open field, no help.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:07:13 pm
WHEW!!
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 10:07:19 pm
Roommates!
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: JaneDoe on December 05, 2009, 10:07:46 pm
Lost in all the frustration and face-punching is the fact that Hunter Lawrence made a game-saving play on that return.

no kidding.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:09:39 pm
I want to see James drop one more fucking pass.

Do it.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: JaneDoe on December 05, 2009, 10:10:16 pm
Catch.
The.
Ball.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:10:21 pm
Huge.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 10:10:33 pm
Jesus mio Malcolm Williams!
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 10:10:57 pm
What is he doing? Slide, motherfucker.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 10:11:15 pm
What is he doing? Slide, motherfucker.

Christ that was dumb.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:11:39 pm
Hey how come the orange thingy on the sideline that shows what down it is keeps going back to "1" and being moved up the field?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: JaneDoe on December 05, 2009, 10:11:56 pm
Christ that was dumb.

Why do you keep bringing Tebow into this?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 10:12:18 pm
Texas can play for the FG and the win on this drive.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 10:12:58 pm
Hey how come the orange thingy on the sideline that shows what down it is keeps going back to "1" and being moved up the field?

To spite Davis
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:13:02 pm
Texas can play for the FG and the win on this drive.

Can I tell you how much better I'd feel with a TD?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:14:00 pm
Now.

We are fucked.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: JaneDoe on December 05, 2009, 10:14:05 pm
OMG
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 10:14:07 pm
Texas can play for the FG and the win on this drive.

Or not.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 10:14:45 pm
Pellini has one helluva defense.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:14:58 pm
We fucked around and fucked around and we're going to lose this game.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 10:17:12 pm
This is really exasperating.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:17:36 pm
What a giant fucking turd.

I swear to fucking god.

Greg Davis is an incompetent moron.   Not one adjustment was made.   Unprepared and outcoached out of yet another title. 

FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:18:15 pm
Go TCU.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chuck on December 05, 2009, 10:18:59 pm
We fucked around and fucked around and we're going to lose this game.

This is the first time all year I've thought that the Horns are going to lose. I hope I'm wrong.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 10:20:32 pm
Nebraska is going to make a FG with about 45 seconds to go. Can UT pull out a miracle after that? Tune in at 10:30.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:22:16 pm
I can't believe we found a way to get outcoached by Nebraska.

Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 10:22:26 pm
It's Colt's time to shine.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:23:26 pm
That is motherfucking huge.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 10:23:32 pm
That's one big break there.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 10:24:16 pm
Horsecollar!
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:24:35 pm
I can't believe Nebraska just gifted us this game.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: SaltyParker on December 05, 2009, 10:25:23 pm
34 yard FG if we can manage not to lose any yardage here.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:25:28 pm
NO TURNOVERS.

Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:26:00 pm
He better hit this FG.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 10:26:36 pm
HOLY FUCKING TEBOW
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:26:39 pm
Did we just Les Miles this?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 10:26:48 pm
W


T


F
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 05, 2009, 10:26:52 pm
Wouldn't this be something.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:27:22 pm
That was some of the dumbest shit I've ever seen.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chuck on December 05, 2009, 10:27:24 pm
These last two play calls have been unconscionable.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 10:27:31 pm
Who the fuck is running this offense?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 10:27:40 pm
This game is incredible.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: SaltyParker on December 05, 2009, 10:27:50 pm
We managed to only lose 3 yards there. Great offensive effort.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 05, 2009, 10:28:31 pm
hurry up and miss already.  i can't take this
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 10:29:19 pm
Ri-fucking-diculous.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: SaltyParker on December 05, 2009, 10:29:45 pm
No pressure.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:30:20 pm
I just broke my arm.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 10:30:26 pm
I TOLD YOU ALKIE
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:30:46 pm
I TOLD YOU ALKIE


Hahahahahahah.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 10:31:11 pm
Farouk for Governor?

Hunter Lawrence says FUCK NO
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Frobie on December 05, 2009, 10:31:35 pm
Congrats, Longhorns!  I'll be pulling for you against the SEC.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 05, 2009, 10:31:40 pm
Hunter Lawrence is the Player of the Game, and not just for that kick.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 10:32:07 pm
They'd better pull their heads out of their butts before they play Alabama.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 10:32:39 pm
How cruel was that camera angle?  FUCK ME what a finish
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chuck on December 05, 2009, 10:33:24 pm
How cruel was that camera angle?  FUCK ME what a finish

Dude, off the foot I thought for certain it was hooking way left. Fuck me, that was nuts.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:34:18 pm
They'd better pull their heads out of their butts before they play Alabama.

Alabama by 300.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 10:35:07 pm
Nebraska had 106 total yards... wow
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chuck on December 05, 2009, 10:36:16 pm
Alabama by 300.

Yeah? I'll take the under.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:42:27 pm
Does anyone else kinda feel like they didn't just watch their team win?

I think I'm gonna be up for a while.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: JaneDoe on December 05, 2009, 10:43:00 pm
Does anyone else kinda feel like they didn't just watch their team win?

I think I'm gonna be up for a while.

Yes.

Me too.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on December 05, 2009, 10:44:17 pm
Man.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 05, 2009, 10:45:46 pm
Colt confused about the time - thought there were 15 seconds left in game (play clock) vs. 8 seconds left (game clock). Wow and lucky.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:47:01 pm
These last two play calls have been unconscionable.

I don't think this should be forgotten.

We seriously tried to lose that game and got fucking lucky that the ball hit the ground when it did.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: austro on December 05, 2009, 10:50:06 pm
Colt confused about the time - thought there were 15 seconds left in game (play clock) vs. 8 seconds left (game clock). Wow and lucky.

What?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chuck on December 05, 2009, 10:51:06 pm
I don't think this should be forgotten.

We could compile a hit parade of this sort of bullshit if we wanted to.

Whatever, Horns win. See you in January.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 05, 2009, 10:51:46 pm
 Just watch him say in post-game for the second time there were 15 seconds left. Wow.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chuck on December 05, 2009, 10:52:12 pm
What?

Apparently amid the mania to build pizza ovens and field level suites someone forgot to put play clocks in view of the players on the field.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: JaneDoe on December 05, 2009, 10:53:07 pm
Apparently amid the mania to build pizza ovens and field level suites someone forgot to put play clocks in view of the players on the field.

There are players on the field?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:54:14 pm
It's been almost 20 minutes and my brain is still waiting for them to break back into coverage to tell us the clock DID run out, NU wins, UT to the Sugar Bowl.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 10:54:31 pm
There are players on the field?

He means on the 80 yard TV.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: DVauthrin on December 05, 2009, 10:56:21 pm
I'll just take the win and forget this game was ever played.    
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: MusicMan on December 05, 2009, 11:00:58 pm
How cruel was that camera angle?  FUCK ME what a finish

First issue I've ever had with U-verse: the fucking picture FROZE as he kicked.  NExt thing I know, Brent says "he made it!"
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 11:04:49 pm
ESPN now reporting UT is not "definitely" going to the title game.

Goddammit.

I mean, I get that it wasn't a playoff, but how the fuck.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 05, 2009, 11:06:09 pm
ESPN now reporting UT is not "definitely" going to the title game.

Goddammit.

I mean, I get that it wasn't a playoff, but how the fuck.

Setting up their BCS selection show, no doubt.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 05, 2009, 11:06:26 pm
Setting up their BCS selection show, no doubt.

That was exactly what I was thinking.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Frobie on December 05, 2009, 11:07:49 pm
ESPN now reporting UT is not "definitely" going to the title game.

Goddammit.

I mean, I get that it wasn't a playoff, but how the fuck.

If I was a betting man--and I'm not--I would be quite confident that it'll be Alabama and UT.  And I have no particular allegiance to either team.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: JaneDoe on December 05, 2009, 11:08:25 pm
Setting up their BCS selection show, no doubt.

One can only hope...
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: MusicMan on December 05, 2009, 11:09:38 pm
ESPN now reporting UT is not "definitely" going to the title game.

Goddammit.

I mean, I get that it wasn't a playoff, but how the fuck.

Never discount the stupidity of the voters.

Thank God Bama curbstomped the Gators.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: DVauthrin on December 05, 2009, 11:48:56 pm
Never discount the stupidity of the voters.

Thank God Bama curbstomped the Gators.

Where was the FUCKING outcry when Bama had to block a last second field goal(2 fg blocks in the game) to beat a mediocre Tennessee team 12-10?    Or where was it last week when Bama never had the lead in the Iron Bowl until the last 1:24 of the game.

It was an ugly win.    But all Texas needed to do was win, and they were in.   All this whining over the quality of the win is silly.     It will be Bama and Texas in Pasadena on January 7th.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chuck on December 06, 2009, 01:11:43 am
All this whining over the quality of the win is silly.

I agree totally. When supposedly inferior teams play top-ranked teams they should certainly elevate their level of play and usually do. I've seen plenty of teams this year play above what you might have expected when facing a top team. And good for them. Would I love Texas to beat everyone by 60? Sure. There are precious few teams who have made it this far without losing any games. I don't care where or whom you play, it is not easy to escape a regular season undefeated. These undefeated teams should all be congratulated enthusiastically, and frankly I hope they all win with the exception of Alabama.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: DVauthrin on December 06, 2009, 01:39:21 am
I agree totally. When supposedly inferior teams play top-ranked teams they should certainly elevate their level of play and usually do. I've seen plenty of teams this year play above what you might have expected when facing a top team. And good for them. Would I love Texas to beat everyone by 60? Sure. There are precious few teams who have made it this far without losing any games. I don't care where or whom you play, it is not easy to escape a regular season undefeated. These undefeated teams should all be congratulated enthusiastically, and frankly I hope they all win with the exception of Alabama.

One of my biggest pet peeves with college football is the way SEC teams are treated compared to everyone else.     Alabama has nail biters with Tennessee and Auburn, but yet they are gritty wins in a great conference.   Same logic applied for Florida when they struggled versus Arkansas this season.  Other teams(like Texas vs Nebraska tonight) have similar games and the attitude is "the team sucks, move them down in the polls."   
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: JimR on December 06, 2009, 07:47:26 am
Does anyone else kinda feel like they didn't just watch their team win?

I think I'm gonna be up for a while.

no. there is no such thing as a bad win.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ebby Calvin on December 06, 2009, 07:51:05 am
First issue I've ever had with U-verse: the fucking picture FROZE as he kicked.  NExt thing I know, Brent says "he made it!"

EXACT same thing happened to me.  Snap, good hold, there's the kick! it looks wide ... AND ..........................Mack Brown cheering.  That's what we got.

I seriously almost passed out.

Hook 'em!
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: JimR on December 06, 2009, 07:57:24 am
What a giant fucking turd.

I swear to fucking god.

Greg Davis is an incompetent moron.   Not one adjustment was made.   Unprepared and outcoached out of yet another title. 

FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK.


seriously, i cannot believe that Davis was the problem to you. i know you are an astute FB fan. our OL could not block their DL. Colt held the ball way too long most of the night. what adjustment do you make when the OL is getting its ass kicked on EVERY play?

the only possible criticism is for the last minute, and Colt's postgame comments showed he was partly responsible for the clock's running down. the last three calls were QB draw, max protect pass, and sprint out Shipley double moves. the officials did not hear/ignored MB's effort to call time at 12 seconds b/c McCoy was not snapping the ball.

titanic defensive struggle, and we won. i'll take it, and i'm happy. fuck ESPN.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 08:50:25 am
Ok, so this is fucking terrifying.

I was being sold on the fact that there were no style points last night.   Texas wins, they're in. 

Immediately after the game, ESPfuckingN goes live and starts reminding voters that, hey, Texas looked like absolute shit last night and that TCU or Cinci (who ALSO looked like shit) deserved some looks ahead of Texas in the human polls.

So then I get up this morning and start reading articles about the game and watching video about the game and, so far, I've read/watched 4 people who actually get to vote today.   All 4, ALL FOUR, have said the exact same thing.

"I mean, I wasn't impressed enough by Texas and I'm putting TCU ahead of them when I vote tomorrow, but there won't be enough of us to take UT out of the #2 spot not to mention the huge boost UT will have in the computer polls for a W (margin ignored) over a quality opponent." 

So I go to the Sagarin ratings, the only computer poll that posts prior to the release of the BCS.

SHIT!

We haven't moved.   And fucking FLORIDA is still #2!!!    It's Alabama, Florida, Cincinnati, TCU, Texas.   

So, I have a bunch of voters telling me THEY won't vote Texas #2 and one of the 6 computer polls telling me Texas hasn't moved and TCU and Cinci are still ahead of them.

It's going to be a long day.   
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 06, 2009, 09:14:24 am
It may be a long day, but it isn't unanimously negative (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/andy_staples/12/06/ut.nu/index.html?eref=sihp).
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: juliogotay on December 06, 2009, 09:55:36 am
It may be a long day, but it isn't unanimously negative (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/andy_staples/12/06/ut.nu/index.html?eref=sihp).


I love Mack's quote " If this had been the SEC you would have called it a beautiful game".
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 10:04:22 am
It may be a long day, but it isn't unanimously negative (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/andy_staples/12/06/ut.nu/index.html?eref=sihp).

I'll still sweat it out.   Too many people saying "well, *I* won't vote for Texas, but everyone else will."

I have a really hard time believing anything about the computer polls at this point.   If margin doesn't matter, and we're all undefeated, how the fuck is Cinci and TCU ahead of us with, now, worse strength of schedule?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 06, 2009, 10:58:38 am
I'll still sweat it out.   Too many people saying "well, *I* won't vote for Texas, but everyone else will."

I have a really hard time believing anything about the computer polls at this point.   If margin doesn't matter, and we're all undefeated, how the fuck is Cinci and TCU ahead of us with, now, worse strength of schedule?

Here's something for you, from the Orangebloods message board. There's no way to verify this, so add salt as necessary:

Quote
So, I talked to my friend last night, he said he was up at the Bristol Complex last night getting ready for NFL Gameday today and was watching the game with others there. Here is what he told me....

"Everyone up at ESPN was hoping/praying that Nebraska won. They want chaos. They want TCU and Cincy to argue like heck right now. After the game was over in their own individual corners making phone calls to people they knew to argue against Texas. EVERYONE! Amazing how annimated everyone was/is about NOT wanting Texas to be automatically given the BCS NC bid. There was one individual in particular, who everyone knows, who was taking it upon himself to call Harris Poll voters."

The individual is supposed to be Chris Fowler.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 06, 2009, 11:04:25 am
I'll still sweat it out.   Too many people saying "well, *I* won't vote for Texas, but everyone else will."


Relax, Alkie.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

What team do you think the Powers That Be want to match up against Alabama? TCU, Cincinnati, or Texas?

Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 06, 2009, 11:06:04 am
Just read someone saying they blew the end of game review last night - supposedly clock is not supposed to be reviewable on its own and is only supposed to be consulted after overturning another decision.

Hard to get too fired up about it, b/c it ended up being the right call, but still more fodder for the conspiracy theorists.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 06, 2009, 11:07:02 am
Here's something for you, from the Orangebloods message board.

"That'll be ten bucks, please."

Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 06, 2009, 11:07:15 am
Relax, Alkie.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

What team do you think the Powers That Be want to match up against Alabama? TCU, Cincinnati, or Texas?


I don't know who the Powers That Be are, but The Media would enjoy some controversy and fodder for stories.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 06, 2009, 11:07:49 am
Just read someone saying they blew the end of game review last night - supposedly clock is not supposed to be reviewable on its own and is only supposed to be consulted after overturning another decision.

Hard to get too fired up about it, b/c it ended up being the right call, but still more fodder for the conspiracy theorists.

Which is completely wrong from everything I've read.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 06, 2009, 11:08:08 am
"That'll be ten bucks, please."


Nah, that's just a teaser for the rest of the content on the board.

Every time I visit it I want to take a shower. The inanity is endless.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 06, 2009, 11:11:33 am
Just read someone saying they blew the end of game review last night - supposedly clock is not supposed to be reviewable on its own and is only supposed to be consulted after overturning another decision.

That's just insipid. There had been clock issues all night long, and the referees, by rule, have the ability to refer to the replay to correct the clock. The clock stopped when the pass hit a railing, which was between .02 and .01 left, so they correctly told the clock operator to put one second back on the clock.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 06, 2009, 11:17:19 am
i don't follow texas football as deeply as all you nerds:  who's the quarterback-in-waiting next year while colt's throwing interceptions on the panthers' practice squad?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 06, 2009, 11:18:53 am
gilbert, garrett.

stud.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 06, 2009, 11:23:31 am
That's just insipid. There had been clock issues all night long, and the referees, by rule, have the ability to refer to the replay to correct the clock. The clock stopped when the pass hit a railing, which was between .02 and .01 left, so they correctly told the clock operator to put one second back on the clock.

The NCAA rules seem to say they can only check the clock on replay following a reversal.

http://www.pac-10.org/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/080805aac.html

Scroll down to the list of reviewable plays.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 06, 2009, 11:28:27 am
gilbert, garrett.

stud.

sounds pretty good.  looks like the next sideways passing star at ut:

Quote
The son of former NFL quarterback Gale Gilbert attended Lake Travis High School in Austin, Texas, where he broke the state record for most passing yards in a season with 4,827 yards during his junior season.[3] The record was previously held by Graham Harrell. Gilbert again broke the same record his senior season, after compiling 4,851 passing yards. He finished his high school career with 12,537 passing yards, another state record which was previously held by Harrell.[4]

and then there's this:

Quote
Former college head coach Jackie Sherrill called Gilbert the best quarterback he has seen since Dan Marino.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 06, 2009, 11:40:25 am
The NCAA rules seem to say they can only check the clock on replay following a reversal.

http://www.pac-10.org/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/080805aac.html

Scroll down to the list of reviewable plays.

LIMITATIONS ON REVIEWABLE PLAYS

ARTICLE 6. No other plays or officiating decisions are reviewable.
However, the replay official may correct egregious errors, including those
involving the game clock, whether or not a play is reviewable.
This excludes
fouls that are not specifically reviewable (Reviewable fouls: Rules 12-3-2-c
and d, 12-3-4-b and 12-3-5-a).

http://www.ncaapublications.com/Uploads/PDF/Football_Rules_5_2204c0005d-845f-4813-8391-54f15136079d.pdf
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 06, 2009, 11:45:42 am
LIMITATIONS ON REVIEWABLE PLAYS

ARTICLE 6. No other plays or officiating decisions are reviewable.
However, the replay official may correct egregious errors, including those
involving the game clock, whether or not a play is reviewable.
This excludes
fouls that are not specifically reviewable (Reviewable fouls: Rules 12-3-2-c
and d, 12-3-4-b and 12-3-5-a).

http://www.ncaapublications.com/Uploads/PDF/Football_Rules_5_2204c0005d-845f-4813-8391-54f15136079d.pdf

I'm sure one second is what they had in mind for egregious time calls.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: homer on December 06, 2009, 11:47:01 am
I'm sure one second is what they had in mind for egregious time calls.

I'm sure they had some clock monkey falling asleep at the end of the game as non-egregious.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 06, 2009, 11:48:03 am
I'm sure one second is what they had in mind for egregious time calls.

Fucking douche.  Are you really arguing that they should have let the game end by a mistake from the guy running the clock?  And trying to justify it, first by the rules, and then by intent of the rules?  Really?  Fucking douche.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 06, 2009, 11:48:16 am
Did that one second help determine the outcome of that game?

I cannot believe people are actually raising a fuss about that call. It was the right call, period.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 06, 2009, 11:48:33 am
Put it this way - I saw how Texas fans reacted to the tiebreaker last year. If this had gone the other way, they would be apoplectic. Pretending it's obvious is disingenuous.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 06, 2009, 11:52:09 am
Put it this way - I saw how Texas fans reacted to the tiebreaker last year. If this had gone the other way, they would be apoplectic. Pretending it's obvious is disingenuous.

My Michelle Valles avatar notwithstanding, I am not exactly a UT football homer. I am a neutral observer. The call was not only right and proper, but it would've been an injustice if Texas were prevented from attempting that FG based on some bullshit about what is and isn't supposedly reviewable.

Come the fuck on.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 06, 2009, 11:55:21 am
I said in my first post thatit doesn't bother me because it was undoubtedly the right call (and I'd like Texas to gplay Alabama and see how everything shakes out).

What I think is bullshit is pretending they didn't blow the call (which happens all the time with NCAA refs and is the real issue here).
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 06, 2009, 11:58:05 am
I said in my first post thatit doesn't bother me because it was undoubtedly the right call (and I'd like Texas to gplay Alabama and see how everything shakes out).

What I think is bullshit is pretending they didn't blow the call (which happens all the time with NCAA refs and is the real issue here).

So you think it's the right call but a blown call?

Wtf.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 06, 2009, 11:58:18 am
I said in my first post thatit doesn't bother me because it was undoubtedly the right call (and I'd like Texas to gplay Alabama and see how everything shakes out).

What I think is bullshit is pretending they didn't blow the call (which happens all the time with NCAA refs and is the real issue here).

Sure, thats the real issue.  You're just concerned about bringing NCAA ref issues to our attention.  You're a fucking troll.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 06, 2009, 12:02:45 pm
I think its interesting that a huge call was bown in one of thebiggest games of the year. If the same thing happened in the Bama Fla game you would be talking abiut the refs. I have never seen a thinner skinned bunch.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: kevwun on December 06, 2009, 12:06:18 pm
I'm sure one second is what they had in mind for egregious time calls.

There's no point in arguing with him about this.  He's just being a contrarian.  The play was clearly reviewable.  It's in the fucking rule book.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 06, 2009, 12:10:30 pm
I think its interesting that a huge call was bown in one of thebiggest games of the year. If the same thing happened in the Bama Fla game you would be talking abiut the refs. I have never seen a thinner skinned bunch.

What blown call are you referring to?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 06, 2009, 12:16:58 pm
Put it this way - if anyone can point to any instance besides this game of a review of just the clock (in an college game period) I will admit I'm just a sack of shit trolling stirring things up. I watch as much college football as anyone and have never seen it happen once.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 06, 2009, 12:20:05 pm
Put it this way - if anyone can point to any instance besides this game of a review of just the clock (in an college game period) I will admit I'm just a sack of shit trolling stirring things up. I watch as much college football as anyone and have never seen it happen once.

The fuck? Refs instruct the clock operators to put time back on the clock all the time.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 06, 2009, 12:21:34 pm
The fuck? Refs instruct the clock operators to put time back on the clock all the time.

I have never seen a review just to check the clock. That's what I'm asking (and what happened). They correct the clock all the time, but not through replay (or they do it after a reversal). I'm starting to think you don't have a clue what the issue even is.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chandler44 on December 06, 2009, 12:22:19 pm
Put it this way - if anyone can point to any instance besides this game of a review of just the clock (in an college game period) I will admit I'm just a sack of shit trolling stirring things up. I watch as much college football as anyone and have never seen it happen once.

Does it matter what *you* have or haven't seen?  

The rule was even pointed out for you in the NCAA handbook, yet you continue to call it a "blown call".  
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 06, 2009, 12:23:39 pm
Textbook troll.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 06, 2009, 12:24:24 pm
Fine, I'm done with it. I think this will become a story. We will see.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: matadorph on December 06, 2009, 12:26:02 pm
I have never seen a review just to check the clock. That's what I'm asking (and what happened). They correct the clock all the time, but not through replay (or they do it after a reversal). I'm starting to think you don't have a clue what the issue even is.

Fuck off, Bizidy. Of course I know what the issue is--getting the fucking call right, which is the underlying purpose behind instant replay itself.

You agree the call was right, yet you think they should not have used instant replay in that instance because you've never seen it before. It's right there in the goddamn rulebook.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chandler44 on December 06, 2009, 12:26:22 pm
Story (http://collegesportsblog.dallasnews.com/)
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 06, 2009, 12:27:03 pm
Fine, I'm done with it. I think this will become a story. We will see.

Who gives a shit if it becomes a story or not? Media coverage has nothing to do with whether something is correct or incorrect.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 06, 2009, 12:40:13 pm
Feel better yet, Alkie? The Coaches' Poll has Texas as a solid #2 (http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/usatpoll.htm).
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 06, 2009, 12:41:57 pm
It would be an unbelievable screwjob if Texas got left out and it won't happen. They played the toughest schedule of any of the unbeaten candidates and won the Big 12.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 06, 2009, 12:47:30 pm
Feel better yet, Alkie? The Coaches' Poll has Texas as a solid #2 (http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/usatpoll.htm).

Is this the one where we get to eventually see who they voted for?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 06, 2009, 12:48:11 pm
Is this the one where we get to eventually see who they voted for?

Yes
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 06, 2009, 12:49:32 pm
Awfully nice to see USC dropped out entirely!
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 06, 2009, 12:50:51 pm
Awfully nice to see USC dropped out entirely!

The one downside to Cal losing is that they probably saved USC from having to go to the Poinsettia bowl.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chuck on December 06, 2009, 12:51:04 pm
Awfully nice to see USC dropped out entirely!

I liked how Nebraska moved UP a spot.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Mr. Happy on December 06, 2009, 12:53:44 pm
It doesn't matter because Alabama is going to kick Texas's ass.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 06, 2009, 01:10:57 pm
It doesn't matter because Alabama is going to kick Texas's ass.

If they both play like they did yesterday, you're right.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 06, 2009, 01:45:44 pm
If they both play like they did yesterday, you're right.

I'm betting the Oct 24 Longhorns are going to kick the shit out of the Oct 24 Tide.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 02:00:47 pm
Yes, I actually do feel much better.  Thank you. 
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: chandler44 on December 06, 2009, 02:44:49 pm
UT #2 in AP Poll (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=4719302)
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: TheWizard on December 06, 2009, 02:47:31 pm
Smart's defense is pretty sick... Texas's offense is going to have to step up.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: juliogotay on December 06, 2009, 02:48:48 pm
I'm betting the Oct 24 Longhorns are going to kick the shit out of the Oct 24 Tide.


"Football games are won by angry young men".  DKR

The 'Horns need to work up a good case of angry against the Tide.

I remember when #2 Texas played in the Cotton Bowl ('64 I believe) against #1 Navy led by Staubach. The eastern sportswriters had written how Navy was going to whip those skinny-legged kids from Texas. With a PA mic stuck in his face during player introductions just before kickoff, Royal's only words were "we're ready". They came out and the run-dominant 'Horns surprised the entire country by hitting on two long TD passes from Duke Carlisle to Phil Harris and Navy couldn't recover against a great Texas defense led by Appleton, Nobis and company.

 Maybe Mack needs to piss in their Cheerios a few times in the next month.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 04:36:34 pm
I'm betting the Oct 24 Longhorns are going to kick the shit out of the Oct 24 Tide.

Actually, Alabama was supposed to annihilate Utah in the Sugar last year, I mean it wasn't even supposed to be fair.

And...um...yeah.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: remy on December 06, 2009, 06:15:58 pm
I was away from the 'net since yesterday afternooon... and I'm sure it's already been covered somewhere in this mammoth thread...

But GAWD those two chicks at halftime had horrible arms.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: JimR on December 06, 2009, 06:37:53 pm
Put it this way - if anyone can point to any instance besides this game of a review of just the clock (in an college game period) I will admit I'm just a sack of shit trolling stirring things up. I watch as much college football as anyone and have never seen it happen once.

yes, you are. thanks for admitting it. the review, you dumbass, was whether the incomplete pass stopped the clock in time. if the rule were as you say, a cheating clock operator could just let it run without review.

all you try to do is fuck with people. if you have any value here, i'd like to know what it is.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: JimR on December 06, 2009, 06:39:11 pm
It doesn't matter because Alabama is going to kick Texas's ass.

fuck you.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 06, 2009, 06:47:39 pm
OB is reporting that the team has been told it's official, they're going to Pasadena. Take a breath, Alkie.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: HudsonHawk on December 06, 2009, 06:53:18 pm
OB is reporting that the team has been told it's official, they're going to Pasadena. Take a breath, Alkie.


I can't believe the handwringing and consterntion over this.  If there was *any* way to get Texas in the BCS championship, they were going to find a way.  There is no way in hell they were going to put in someone like TCU over UT.  That's the purpose of the BCS.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 06:56:31 pm
So you're saying the polls are fixed?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 06, 2009, 06:57:22 pm

I can't believe the handwringing and consterntion over this.  If there was *any* way to get Texas in the BCS championship, they were going to find a way.  There is no way in hell they were going to put in someone like TCU over UT.  That's the purpose of the BCS.

Who is the "they" that has the power to "put someone in" to meet the purpose of the BCS?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: HudsonHawk on December 06, 2009, 06:59:15 pm
So you're saying the polls are fixed?

Fixed in that there's no way in hell that they're gonna allow something like 1984 again.  That's why the BCS and it's predecessors was formed, to specifically *avoid* having a team from a minor conference ranked No 1.  And I'm saying that the BCS rankings exists to validate the polls, not provide an alternative.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: HudsonHawk on December 06, 2009, 06:59:39 pm
Who is the "they" that has the power to "put someone in" to meet the purpose of the BCS?

Those who rank the teams.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 07:04:01 pm
I can't fucking wait for the Boise/TCU game. 

I also couldn't possibly give a fuck less about the GaTech/Iowa Orange Bowl.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 06, 2009, 07:05:39 pm
TCUs hand signal is air quotes?  Cool
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 07:24:04 pm
TCUs hand signal is air quotes?  Cool

Best in college, by far, is Wichita State.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Mr. Happy on December 06, 2009, 07:42:13 pm
fuck you.

You can throw out "fuck you's" all you want. McCoy is a college QB. Nothing more. Alabama has more playmakers than Texas. And a better defense. And a better coach.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: juliogotay on December 06, 2009, 07:52:35 pm
You can throw out "fuck you's" all you want. McCoy is a college QB. Nothing more. Alabama has more playmakers than Texas. And a better defense. And a better coach.

USC suppossedly had all of those things, too, in 2006. McCoy is a college QB. This is a college football game. Where's the rub?
Do you think McElroy is better? I don't.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: juliogotay on December 06, 2009, 07:59:16 pm
Actually, Alabama was supposed to annihilate Utah in the Sugar last year, I mean it wasn't even supposed to be fair.

And...um...yeah.


That's not really a comparable. Bama had just lost their conference championship game and obviously wasn't fully motivated. Inexcusable but not the same as playing for the national title. There was some controversy around Bama's all-everything left OT and he got his ass handed to him that night. Saban's boys will be ready.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: juliogotay on December 06, 2009, 08:03:22 pm
I can't fucking wait for the Boise/TCU game. 

I also couldn't possibly give a fuck less about the GaTech/Iowa Orange Bowl.


I bet Boise/TCU is one of the better bowls. I personally enjoy watching Ga Tech run that option. It's a thing of beauty when done correctly, every bit as pretty as a long pass completion. Just my two cents worth...I'm sure I'm in the minority of Americans on these two games.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 08:24:47 pm
USC suppossedly had all of those things, too, in 2006.

Yeah, that's what I said at dinner tonight.

USC was supposed to kill us too.   Faster, stronger, better RB, better receivers, better lines on both sides, arguably a better QB (using the traditional white QB vs combo black QB bullshit argument).   I even remember people saying that USC team was maybe the best team of all time before the Rose Bowl.   Two Heismans.  Lots of other hardware.  Lots of other jewelry.   Better assistant coaches.  Prettier cheerleaders. 

41-38.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 08:27:03 pm
I bet Boise/TCU is one of the better bowls.

Anyone who disagrees with you just isn't paying attention.

Chris Peterson with a month to prepare is goddamn frightening.   Gary Patterson with a month to prepare an already well oiled machine is goddamn frightening.

If my team wasn't playing in the game, I'd be a lot more excited as a football fan about the Fiesta Bowl than the MNC game.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 08:32:12 pm
Look, if our OL can pull their heads out of their asses and they certainly have enough time to work on shit, we're no worse than Bama.

Chuck and I watched the Bama/Tenn game and laughed and wished we could play Bama in the title game.   Guess we got what we wished for.

If the Tide Vols game had been last night, everyone would be talking about how the Horns are going to beat the Tide by 50.

Also, if I've learned anything about sports, it's that the guys in the desert who get paid to handicap games are pretty fucking good at what they do.    Bama -3.   I can live with that line.   Someone correct me, but I believe SC was favored by 3 in the Rose Bowl as well.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 06, 2009, 08:39:29 pm
Also, if I've learned anything about sports, it's that the guys in the desert who get paid to handicap games are pretty fucking good at what they do.    Bama -3.  

Cue HH, in 5..4..3..
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 08:40:57 pm
Cue HH, in 5..4..3..

As usual, I'm not looking for validation.   
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: ybbodeus on December 06, 2009, 08:43:48 pm
Boise Cincy would have made for madness. Wish that would have been the Fiesta.

TCU Florida would have been more SEC like.

The Fiesta and Sugar are good bowl match-ups that could have been better viewing, I believe, with those hypotheticals.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: HudsonHawk on December 06, 2009, 08:44:24 pm
Cue HH, in 5..4..3..

Not sure what this means.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 08:52:42 pm
Boise Cincy would have made for madness. Wish that would have been the Fiesta.

You'd rather watch Boise/Cinci than Boise/TCU?

I'm not trying to change your mind, I'm just saying, I don't agree with that at all and I think that most of the general college football viewing public finds the matchup we actually got to be a lot sexier.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 08:54:18 pm
Also, if I've learned anything about sports, it's that the guys in the desert who get paid to handicap games are pretty fucking good at what they do.    Bama -3.   I can live with that line.   Someone correct me, but I believe SC was favored by 3 in the Rose Bowl as well.

To be clear on my point here...I'm saying that the line tends to be closer to reality than the hype and media bullshit.

If you listen to the media, Bama is going to win this game by 30.

I have a feeling the -3 is going to be a lot closer to reality than the -30 Fox Sports and ESPN seems to be hoping for.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 06, 2009, 08:57:04 pm
Not sure what this means.

Thought incorrectly using the vegas line to suggest it represents how professional gamblers rank/rate teams was something you've frequently had to correct
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: HudsonHawk on December 06, 2009, 08:58:43 pm
Thought incorrectly using the vegas line to suggest it represents how professional gamblers rank/rate teams was something you've frequently had to correct


Ah...yes, you are correct.  I missed that.

Alkie...shame on you.  You know better what betting lines represent.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 08:59:04 pm
Thought incorrectly using the vegas line to suggest it represents how professional gamblers rank/rate teams was something you've frequently had to correct

I wasn't even kind of suggesting the line ranked teams.  I was talking about how the line predicts the score of a single game.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 09:00:20 pm
Alkie...shame on you.  You know better what betting lines represent.

That....it's....what....they...think.....the....game...will...be....decided...by....roughly?   Isn't that exactly what I was talking about?

Where did I suggest it was a way to rank teams?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: HudsonHawk on December 06, 2009, 09:01:17 pm
I wasn't even kind of suggesting the line ranked teams.  I was talking about how the line predicts the score of a single game.

The betting line doesn't predict scores, it encourages betting on both teams. 
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 06, 2009, 09:01:40 pm
I wasn't even kind of suggesting the line ranked teams.  I was talking about how the line predicts the score of a single game.

Ugh.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: HudsonHawk on December 06, 2009, 09:02:06 pm
That....it's....what....they...think.....the....game...will...be....decided...by....roughly? 


No...it's...not.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 09:06:23 pm
You know the most awesome part of this forum?

The know-it-all lectures by people who know as much as or less than you about something. 
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: HudsonHawk on December 06, 2009, 09:07:26 pm
You know the most awesome part of this forum?

The know-it-all lectures by people who know as much as or less than you about something. 


No way.  That's only about the fourth most awesome part of this forum.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 09:08:17 pm

No way.  That's only about the fourth most awesome part of this forum.

3rd and I won't bend on this one.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: HudsonHawk on December 06, 2009, 09:09:06 pm
3rd and I won't bend on this one.


As long as we all agree that the constant stream of profanity is consensus number one.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 09:11:13 pm

As long as we all agree that the constant stream of profanity is consensus number one.

I actually agree with this one.   

I recently became the admin of a much less interesting forum site and in all seriousness, it burns me up inside that I have to make OTHER people stop talking trash and swearing at each other for business sake.   It kills me inside.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: juliogotay on December 06, 2009, 09:11:58 pm
Look, if our OL can pull their heads out of their asses and they certainly have enough time to work on shit, we're no worse than Bama.

Chuck and I watched the Bama/Tenn game and laughed and wished we could play Bama in the title game.   Guess we got what we wished for.

If the Tide Vols game had been last night, everyone would be talking about how the Horns are going to beat the Tide by 50.

Also, if I've learned anything about sports, it's that the guys in the desert who get paid to handicap games are pretty fucking good at what they do.    Bama -3.   I can live with that line.   Someone correct me, but I believe SC was favored by 3 in the Rose Bowl as well.


I thought the OL was going to be a strength this year. Hasn't worked out that way at all. Suh may be the best I've seen in college though. Bama can't have anyone better than that.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 06, 2009, 09:13:27 pm

I thought the OL was going to be a strength this year. Hasn't worked out that way at all. Suh may be the best I've seen in college though. Bama can't have anyone better than that.

Suh is a motherfucking beast from another planet.   I wish my team had a higher pick so they could take him.

And I am fully aware of and absolutely terrified (now) of how we'll contain Cody.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Mr. Happy on December 06, 2009, 09:34:29 pm
USC suppossedly had all of those things, too, in 2006. McCoy is a college QB. This is a college football game. Where's the rub?
Do you think McElroy is better? I don't.
McElroy is no better. But McCoy is the Heisman hopeful. McElroy is a serviceable college QB, running an offense that has several playmakers but that doesn't beat itself. Alabama's defense will come to play. I'm no Alabama fan-remember Nick Satan is their coach. However, my position is based on watching both teams play good defenses.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Trey on December 06, 2009, 09:45:54 pm
That's not really a comparable. Bama had just lost their conference championship game and obviously wasn't fully motivated. Inexcusable but not the same as playing for the national title. There was some controversy around Bama's all-everything left OT and he got his ass handed to him that night. Saban's boys will be ready.

He didn't get his ass handed to him that night.  He got his ass sent home about four days before the game by Saban (/AD/NCAA) for illegal contact with an agent.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: MusicMan on December 06, 2009, 09:52:09 pm
Suh is a motherfucking beast from another planet.   I wish my team had a higher pick so they could take him.

And I am fully aware of and absolutely terrified (now) of how we'll contain Cody.

Perhaps Cody will have the decency to tell Chris Hall the safe word in advance.  Unlike Suh.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: ybbodeus on December 06, 2009, 09:56:56 pm
Boise and Cincy would feature two imaginative offenses going head to head.

TCU Florida would feature two power teams with good defenses getting after each other.

If you prefer contrasting styles, then you lile these match-ups better, and I'm fine with that, too.

TCU feels like it has something to prove, even if astrofrog thinks they already have. A victory over Florida proves more than one over Boise.

Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: TheWizard on December 06, 2009, 10:02:48 pm
I don't think McElroy is better.... but Ingram and his fellow backs are a beastly package. 

And I'd take Julio Jones on my pickup flag football team.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on December 07, 2009, 05:56:21 am
When Gene Stallings, a man I greatly admire, was coach, I tried to pull for 'Bama. I wanted him to win but I wanted the school to lose. It was perplexing.

That Javier Arenas is a kick and punt returning mother fucker and a nifty defensive back. He is great at corner blitzes. He has open field moves that break ankles. I can't believe there are no offensive plays designed for him. His kick and punt returns are  reminiscent of Barry Sanders at Okie State.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on December 07, 2009, 06:44:39 am
the review, you dumbass, was whether the incomplete pass stopped the clock in time.

Thank you.

Here's a suggestion to crybaby Nebraska Football fans and coaches looking for blame for losing that game. Don't kick the ball out of bounds on kickoffs and don't horse collar tackle.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: AstroFrog on December 07, 2009, 08:03:32 am
TCUs hand signal is air quotes?  Cool

Were you around the SWC much?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: juliogotay on December 07, 2009, 09:47:55 am
He didn't get his ass handed to him that night.  He got his ass sent home about four days before the game by Saban (/AD/NCAA) for illegal contact with an agent.

That's it. Thanks for the clarification. His replacement IIRC had a tough night.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: juliogotay on December 07, 2009, 09:56:04 am
According to the Omaha World-Herald, Carl Pellini shouted at Texas "You should be ashamed to accept that trophy" after the game and Bo Pellini said as he entered the locker room " BCS. That's why they made that call."  The DMN reported yesterday that Pellini and Tom Osborne confered after the game with Big 12 commish Beebe.

Meanwhile, Walt Anderson Big 12 coordinator of football officials maintains the right call was made. "There was a second left so we put that back up". The play could be reviewed because it involved "a clock error at a critical time in the game."
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: juliogotay on December 07, 2009, 10:00:59 am
Texas is 7-0-1 alltime v. Alabama with a history beginning with a 1902 game in Alabama and most recently at the '82 Cotton Bowl (I was there, it was cold as hell). In 1965 #5 ranked Texas bested #1 ranked Bama 21-17 in the Orange Bowl as Nobis and company had a great goal-line stand against a Joe Namath led squad. That game was significant also for being the first bowl game played at night. The tie came at the 1960 Bluebonnet Bowl 3-3.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 07, 2009, 10:14:04 am
I've been to some Cotton Bowls too and the weather is almost ALWAYS cold and sloppy. The first one I went to was a surprise last-minute thing in 1979 and I shrewdly wore a t-shirt and jeans because it was in the 60s the day before. Of course, it was 38 and sleeting during the game and we were pretty far up in the stands. Brrrr.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: ybbodeus on December 07, 2009, 10:14:50 am
I knew that the Bear had never beaten Texas, not as the Crimson Tide coach, anyway (he did as A&M's coach--John David Crow era).  I just didn't realize the school never had.  
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Col. Sphinx Drummond on December 07, 2009, 10:35:19 am
I've been to some Cotton Bowls too and the weather is almost ALWAYS cold and sloppy. The first one I went to was a surprise last-minute thing in 1979 and I shrewdly wore a t-shirt and jeans because it was in the 60s the day before. Of course, it was 38 and sleeting during the game and we were pretty far up in the stands. Brrrr.
Fuck Joe Montana.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 07, 2009, 10:45:02 am
And Notre Dame.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: juliogotay on December 07, 2009, 11:02:52 am
I knew that the Bear had never beaten Texas, not as the Crimson Tide coach, anyway (he did as A&M's coach--John David Crow era).  I just didn't realize the school never had.  



There was the controversy from the Cotton Bowl  of '73 won by Texas 17-13. QB Alan Lowery's TD run included a possible foot OOB. Even the goal line stand IIRC in the '65 Orange Bowl had Bama thinking Namath had crossed the goal. Not that ancient history has anything to do with this game but I personally am looking forward to this matchup.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: juliogotay on December 07, 2009, 11:06:20 am
I've been to some Cotton Bowls too and the weather is almost ALWAYS cold and sloppy. The first one I went to was a surprise last-minute thing in 1979 and I shrewdly wore a t-shirt and jeans because it was in the 60s the day before. Of course, it was 38 and sleeting during the game and we were pretty far up in the stands. Brrrr.

Those days, sadly I say, are over as the Cotton Bowl moves to Jerryworld this year. Those of you that don't live in Dallas (most of you obviously) may not realize that Jones' first choice was to put the new stadium in Dallas in or near Fair Park. The mayor at that time would not even meet with him to discuss.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 07, 2009, 11:20:23 am
Is it in Jerryworld forever now?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: ybbodeus on December 07, 2009, 11:46:54 am
I prefer the darker label of "Jonestown" for said stadium.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: juliogotay on December 07, 2009, 11:50:06 am
Is it in Jerryworld forever now?

Yes. After Jerryworld was announced for Arlington Dallas mayor Laura Miller led an effort to rennovate the Cotton Bowl to keep Tex/Ok. and the CB game and she added that they would go get other college games during the season for the rennovated CB. If they have added a game it was a couple of small colleges that wouldn't impact the local economy much. Arlington has had several top-tier schools play in their place this year and one would think that will continue in the future. Meanwhile, an extension of Tex/Ok happened on Miller's watch but she had little if any influence on it. The deal was brokered by a local dairy owner who simply picked up the phone and made a couple of calls to get the parties together to discuss an extension. It will be interesting to see what happens to Tx/OU in the future.

Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 07, 2009, 11:50:28 am
Can we get the Kool-Aid concession?
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: juliogotay on December 07, 2009, 11:50:37 am
I prefer the darker label of "Jonestown" for said stadium.

That works for me.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: ybbodeus on December 07, 2009, 11:51:39 am
Ron's ahead of us both.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Alkie on December 07, 2009, 12:33:16 pm
Can we get the Kool-Aid concession?

Flavor-aid, people.  FLAVOR-AID.

Who clearly has the best damage controlling PR on Earth.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 07, 2009, 12:39:40 pm
On a Blackberry I can't get the YouTube link, but this calls for Guyana Punch by the Judys.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Ron Brand on December 07, 2009, 12:49:38 pm
I thought there were pictures of boxes of both Kool-Aid and Flavor-Aid at the site. Not that it matters much.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: HudsonHawk on December 07, 2009, 12:57:05 pm
On a Blackberry I can't get the YouTube link, but this calls for Guyana Punch by the Judys.

Here ya go...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K74GSl3T7tQ
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: sporadic on December 07, 2009, 01:25:16 pm
The line on Texas/Bama has moved all the way to 5.5.  The SEC money must be coming in like crazy.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Lurch on December 07, 2009, 01:29:26 pm
The line on Texas/Bama has moved all the way to 5.5.  The SEC money must be coming in like crazy.

Considering the coverage this is getting, I wouldn't be surprised to see it hit 9.  And that's when it's time to buy.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: juliogotay on December 07, 2009, 01:44:42 pm
And Notre Dame.

The next ND coach will have to start over at pitch and catch. Claussen and Tate announcing today for the NFL.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Bench on December 07, 2009, 02:15:26 pm
The line on Texas/Bama has moved all the way to 5.5.  The SEC money must be coming in like crazy.

No, it's just that the experts are refining their prediction regarding what the final score will be.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: SaltyParker on December 07, 2009, 09:00:07 pm
No, it's just that the experts are refining their prediction regarding what the final score will be.
There is no prediction. The objective is to get even money on each team, that way Vegas makes money whatever the outcome. The spread will change according to how the money flows in.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 07, 2009, 09:32:40 pm
There is no prediction. The objective is to get even money on each team, that way Vegas makes money whatever the outcome. The spread will change according to how the money flows in.

i don't get this recent 'gambling lines aren't predictions' line of thought that seems to be taking hold.  yes, a bookie's goal is usually to set a line in the hope that it will garner even betting, but the method to do that is to make a very educated guess as to how many points a particular team will win by.  bookies study trends and statistics like a hawk.  you never see them set lines based on unfounded popular perceptions, because they know that professional gamblers will be sure to take advantage if they do.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: HudsonHawk on December 08, 2009, 08:01:33 am
There is no prediction. The objective is to get even money on each team, that way Vegas makes money whatever the outcome. The spread will change according to how the money flows in.


You need to reboot your sarcasm detector.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: HudsonHawk on December 08, 2009, 08:06:09 am
i don't get this recent 'gambling lines aren't predictions' line of thought that seems to be taking hold.  yes, a bookie's goal is usually to set a line in the hope that it will garner even betting, but the method to do that is to make a very educated guess as to how many points a particular team will win by.  bookies study trends and statistics like a hawk.  you never see them set lines based on unfounded popular perceptions, because they know that professional gamblers will be sure to take advantage if they do.

Gambling lines may approach a predicted score, but that is a byproduct of an educated betting pool, not the goal of the bookie.  The goal of a bookie is now, has always been, and will always be, to make money.  In order to do ensure that he does, he must get people to bet on the underdog.  The bookie really doesn't care if the spread is 1 point or 1,000 points, as long as people are betting on both sides.  And this isn't a recent phenomenon, odds and spreads have been standard bookmaking practice since the beginning of gambling.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 08, 2009, 08:18:57 am
HH, that's by far the best post I've seen you make on this subject. Bookies don't give 2 shits about the outcome of the game - if a magical gnome would just guarantee them that if they used a certain line the action would be 50-50 tehyd take it.

However, the "dumb" money are the people who think theline has no predictive value of the outcome. Exactly as you say, the smart gamblers are the reason (it's just like the stock market - the stock prices you see on the TV are just set by market makers trying to balance thebid ask. They do EXACTLY what bookies do in that regard).However, both in the case of stocks and betting lines, they represent the best possible public knowledge on the issue.

The idea that the line is being set by a bunch of backwater Alabamans and is unrelated to the outcome is idiotic, and exactly what the smart money bettors want the dumb money bettors to beieve.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: HudsonHawk on December 08, 2009, 08:48:09 am
The idea that the line is being set by a bunch of backwater Alabamans and is unrelated to the outcome is idiotic, and exactly what the smart money bettors want the dumb money bettors to beieve.

Yes, and no.  If the backwater Alabamans continue to pour endless amounts of money on Alabama to win, the spread will change, regardless of whether it makes football sense or not.  This is unlikely to happen because for every backwater Alabaman who'll put his trailer up for an Alabama win, there is an educated UT fan who'll realize that and put his pocket change up for his team to win, keeping the spread stable.  But if for some reason the betting gets lopsised, the spread will change.  It's a balance for sure, but at the end of the day, it's not about the score, it's about getting people to bet on the score. 
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 08, 2009, 08:52:07 am
Yes, and no.  If the backwater Alabamans continue to pour endless amounts of money on Alabama to win, the spread will change, regardless of whether it makes football sense or not.  This is unlikely to happen because for every backwater Alabaman who'll put his trailer up for an Alabama win, there is an educated UT fan who'll realize that and put his pocket change up for his team to win, keeping the spread stable.  But if for some reason the betting gets lopsised, the spread will change.  It's a balance for sure, but at the end of the day, it's not about the score, it's about getting people to bet on the score. 

What this discounts is that amount of smart money - fans of either team aren't the ones really determining it. This is another way it's very similar to the stock market; Most investors are retail investors (idiots like you and me), but the vast majority of the actual money is professionals. It's the same in sports betting. Obviously hypothetically if everyone in the Southeast bet everything they had on Alabama, it would move the line. All I'm saying is that in practice that's not what happens. I will say that it's more likely to happen in a big game like the national championship than an ordinary one (the smart money is playing every week no matter how exciting the game is, the change is in the dumb money).

Some sports betting sites have an interesting feature where you can see what percent of bettors (not money, that's obviously usually around 50-50) are on each side of the bet. You sometimes see 60-70% of bettors on one side; that's usually a good sign that the dumb money and smart money disagree.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: HudsonHawk on December 08, 2009, 09:01:14 am
What this discounts is that amount of smart money - fans of either team aren't the ones really determining it. This is another way it's very similar to the stock market; Most investors are retail investors (idiots like you and me), but the vast majority of the actual money is professionals. It's the same in sports betting. Obviously hypothetically if everyone in the Southeast bet everything they had on Alabama, it would move the line. All I'm saying is that in practice that's not what happens. I will say that it's more likely to happen in a big game like the national championship than an ordinary one (the smart money is playing every week no matter how exciting the game is, the change is in the dumb money).

Right.  I think we all know that in the BCS championship game, the big money is being bet by people who understand college football, not the yahoos who paint their pickup trucks the school colors.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BizidyDizidy on December 08, 2009, 09:03:10 am
Right.  I think we all know that in the BCS championship game, the big money is being bet by people who understand college football, not the yahoos who paint their pickup trucks the school colors.

The counterbalancing fact in general is that the amount of disposable money for the pick-up painting yahoos is naturally limited.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: Rebel Jew on December 08, 2009, 09:25:07 am
What this discounts is that amount of smart money - fans of either team aren't the ones really determining it. This is another way it's very similar to the stock market; Most investors are retail investors (idiots like you and me), but the vast majority of the actual money is professionals. It's the same in sports betting. Obviously hypothetically if everyone in the Southeast bet everything they had on Alabama, it would move the line. All I'm saying is that in practice that's not what happens. I will say that it's more likely to happen in a big game like the national championship than an ordinary one (the smart money is playing every week no matter how exciting the game is, the change is in the dumb money).

good post.  the predominant public view of the game is "well, alabama just blew out tim tebow and texas got lucky against nebraska, plus the sec is the best conference and nick saban the best coach, therefore alabama will probably win."  this perception did end up matching up with the actual line, but i guarantee this wasn't the bookie's thought process.  whatever logarithims they use, with whatever standard factors they include, indicated that spread.  if they set the line based solely on the public view, every pro gambler in the country would immediately recognize it and start pouring money in for texas, even though the public was betting 50/50.  vegas would then be biting its nails praying for alabama to win by a touchdown.

if you notice, bookies almost never end up moving their initial lines by more than two points in any one direction no matter how crazy the betting trend on a particular team; anything more is because of a major injury or other major tangible factor.  and if you've ever gambled you know that bookies are so sure about their lines that buying even an extra half point on the spread in your favor will cost you a lot of money.

vegas odds have long since shown themselves to be reliable enough to use as barometers for how much better one team is than the other going into a game.  does it really mean anything at the end of the day?  probably not, but no person or entity has shown itself to be better at predicting games than vegas, and if they are better, then vegas will figure out its metric and incorporate it into their own.
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: BUWebguy on December 08, 2009, 10:38:58 am
but no person or entity has shown itself to be better at predicting games than vegas, and if they are better, then vegas will figure out its metric and incorporate it into their own.

That's it -- I was "incorporated"!

signed,
Tim Donaghy (http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=4722989)
Title: Re: Big 12 Title Game Thread
Post by: OregonStrosFan on December 08, 2009, 05:20:52 pm
The clock stopped when the pass hit a railing...

Apparently Colt missed that class... (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=4725231&campaign=rss&source=ESPNHeadlines)