OrangeWhoopass.com Forums

General Discussion => Talk Zone => Topic started by: Ebby Calvin on May 19, 2008, 09:03:29 am

Title: Bob Davidson
Post by: Ebby Calvin on May 19, 2008, 09:03:29 am
Admits a bad call on a Carlos Delgado HR:
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3402805

Quote
"I (expletive) it up. I'm the one who thought it was a (expletive) foul ball. I saw it on the replay. I'm the one who (expletive) it up so you can put that in your paper," Davidson said. "Bolts and nuts, I (expletive) up. You've just got to move on. No one feels worse about it than I do."

If only we can get that kind of closure on Bourn's first sb attempt on Sunday.
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: Limey on May 19, 2008, 09:08:43 am
CB Bucknor would like 1,235,946 other offenses to be taken into consideration.
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: Astroholic on May 19, 2008, 10:12:00 am
CB Bucknor would like 1,235,946 other offenses to be taken into consideration.

Not that it matters to anyone, but Davidson just earned a great deal of respect from me.
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: Taras Bulba on May 19, 2008, 10:24:47 am
Joe West just called in to say that he's fat, drunk, and arrogant and doesn't give a shit.
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: Noe on May 19, 2008, 10:26:44 am
Angel Hernandez just text this message to Balkin' Bob Davidson:

U R an idiot.  LOL
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: BatGirl on May 19, 2008, 03:09:57 pm
an ump actually admits he isn't infallible - good!
maybe others will follow suit and we can
start talking about instant replay rules for mlb
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: Gizzmonic on May 19, 2008, 03:19:59 pm
an ump actually admits he isn't infallible - good!
maybe others will follow suit and we can
start talking about instant replay rules for mlb

My favorite part was Joe Morgan talking about how he doesn't support instant reply and that human error is a part of the game, etc...when was he saying this?

During the long-ass delay while the umpires huddled and decided (incorrectly) that the ball was foul.

Luckily the Mets ran away with that one or I'm sure it would be burning up all the national talk shows today.
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: austro on May 19, 2008, 03:24:46 pm
My favorite part was Joe Morgan talking about how he doesn't support instant reply and that human error is a part of the game, etc...when was he saying this?

Joe almost broke my television when he tried to tell me that I could see more of a ball when it's up high than I could when it's down low. Um, Joe: it's a sphere. I'm pretty sure you're going to see the same amount of the ball no matter where it is.
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: hillbillyken on May 19, 2008, 03:27:44 pm
What I don't get is Mike Riley  is in position and gets the call right. Then Jetter and Damon convince him he was wrong??? And it gets overturned by Davidson from way back behind the plate? WHAT THE.....


And on a side note to this story sorry if i am "Cabraraing" this but did anybody notice that when they flashed up a picture of Lance and how well he is playing Miller give hin some props then the great Joe Morgan replies with  something like "it what is amizing about this is how well Soriano is hitting the ball as well" ?????
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: David in Jackson on May 19, 2008, 04:28:16 pm
Admits a bad call on a Carlos Delgado HR:
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3402805

If only we can get that kind of closure on Bourn's first sb attempt on Sunday.

that call was terrible.  He was clearly out on the second throw, though. 
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: Bench on May 19, 2008, 04:33:42 pm
Joe almost broke my television when he tried to tell me that I could see more of a ball when it's up high than I could when it's down low. Um, Joe: it's a sphere. I'm pretty sure you're going to see the same amount of the ball no matter where it is.

I only caught a few innings of the game, but at one point Joe said that left-handed pitchers "don't like to throw to first base" when there's a runner on. Does that make any sense?
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: Taras Bulba on May 19, 2008, 04:40:30 pm
I only caught a few innings of the game, but at one point Joe said that left-handed pitchers "don't like to throw to first base" when there's a runner on. Does that make any sense?

I've been chewing on Rolaids and peyote buttons all afternoon.  It makes perfect sense.
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: Gizzmonic on May 19, 2008, 04:42:17 pm
Damn, I missed making my whole point in the last post.

Morgan was complaining about how instant replay would slow down the game during fill time while the umpires were discussing whether the ball was fair or foul.

The only difference with instant replay would be that they got the call right!

I only caught a few innings of the game, but at one point Joe said that left-handed pitchers "don't like to throw to first base" when there's a runner on. Does that make any sense?
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: JaneDoe on May 19, 2008, 04:42:23 pm
I only caught a few innings of the game, but at one point Joe said that left-handed pitchers "don't like to throw to first base" when there's a runner on. Does that make any sense?

Does Joe ever make sense?
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: JimR on May 19, 2008, 04:43:10 pm
I've been chewing on Rolaids and peyote buttons all afternoon.  It makes perfect sense.

you're fucked up crazy but your calcium levels are high.
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: Limey on May 19, 2008, 07:47:28 pm
I only caught a few innings of the game, but at one point Joe said that left-handed pitchers "don't like to throw to first base" when there's a runner on. Does that make any sense?

Yes, because they don't like it when there's runners on.  Just the same as righties.
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: Bench on May 20, 2008, 09:10:36 am
Yes, because they don't like it when there's runners on.  Just the same as righties.

No no. The righties were cool with it - Joe went out of his way to say that just lefties as a rule hated throwing to first. I guess maybe they're standing their, just looking at the runner. Being teased and tempted until they just can't take it anymore.
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: HudsonHawk on May 20, 2008, 10:31:28 am
an ump actually admits he isn't infallible - good!
maybe others will follow suit and we can
start talking about instant replay rules for mlb


I do not like the idea of umpires coming out later admitting mistakes.  Not they should claim to be infallible, but they should make the calls, and that's the end of it.  Period. 
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: BatGirl on May 20, 2008, 03:34:46 pm

I do not like the idea of umpires coming out later admitting mistakes.  Not they should claim to be infallible, but they should make the calls, and that's the end of it.  Period. 

just curious -
do you feel it will harm the integrity of the game
if more umps admit they blew a call after seeing the replay?
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: HudsonHawk on May 20, 2008, 06:41:00 pm
just curious -
do you feel it will harm the integrity of the game
if more umps admit they blew a call after seeing the replay?


No, I feel it opens up too many calls for argument.  The umpires should make the call and everyone move on.
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: Sleepy on May 20, 2008, 06:56:48 pm
How would you make instant replay work in baseball?  Limited challenges like in the NFL?  Umpires' discression on when to call upstairs?  It seems it would really change the manager/umpire arguing dynamic, which some argue adds excitement to the game if you agree with the manager but can be really annoying if you don't.  Could it eliminate that part of the game?

Replays would be available on:
Balls/strikes? (no way)
Safe/out? (probably)
Foul/fair? (yes)
Homer? (yes)

Does the umpires' association object because it undermines them or support because they get more umpires in the booth?  I'm guessing the former!

Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: BatGirl on May 20, 2008, 07:54:48 pm
not that my opinion counts for anything, but i would be in favor of limiting
an instant-replay decision to only a few instances.  an umpire not being
in position to see a play to make a call, and definitely a homerun/foul ball situation.

Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: Taras Bulba on May 20, 2008, 10:00:54 pm
not that my opinion counts for anything, but i would be in favor of limiting
an instant-replay decision to only a few instances.  an umpire not being
in position to see a play to make a call, and definitely a homerun/foul ball situation.



Also, every ball and strike call by C.B. Bucknor.
Title: Re: Bob Davidson
Post by: MRaup on May 21, 2008, 11:48:45 am
Also, every ball and strike call by C.B. Bucknor.

CB: STRIKE ONE!

Replay Official: >BZZZZZZZT!< Ball 1.

CB: STRIKE ONE!

Replay Official: >BZZZZZZZT!< Ball 2.

CB: Ball ONE!

Replay Official: >BZZZZZZZZT< Strike 1.

CB: That's it, you're outta here pal! (at the Replay Official).

Replay Official: >BZZZZZZZZT< No.

CB: (muttering) I'm calling my union rep.