OrangeWhoopass.com Forums

General Discussion => Talk Zone => Topic started by: Burzmali on December 05, 2007, 08:17:12 am

Title: Astros Turned Down Cordero
Post by: Burzmali on December 05, 2007, 08:17:12 am
"The Nationals continue to drive a hard bargain for closer Chad Cordero. The Brewers said no to the Nats' request for second baseman Rickie Weeks, and the Astros were equally dismissive when the Nats asked for reliever Chad Qualls and outfielder Luke Scott."

Rosenthal

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7526956

If true, good move by Wade. Qualls had a better season than Cordero last year, and Scott is solid even if they aren't playing him.
Title: Re: Astros Turned Down Cordero
Post by: Astroholic on December 05, 2007, 08:19:59 am
"The Nationals continue to drive a hard bargain for closer Chad Cordero. The Brewers said no to the Nats' request for second baseman Rickie Weeks, and the Astros were equally dismissive when the Nats asked for reliever Chad Qualls and outfielder Luke Scott."

Rosenthal

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7526956

If true, good move by Wade. Qualls had a better season than Cordero last year, and Scott is solid even if they aren't playing him.

you just love you some Scott, don't you?
Title: Re: Astros Turned Down Cordero
Post by: utastro on December 05, 2007, 09:18:02 am
you just love you some Scott, don't you?

The force is strong with that one.
Title: Re: Astros Turned Down Cordero
Post by: JackAstro on December 05, 2007, 09:34:36 am
This was discussed yesterday.
Title: Re: Astros Turned Down Cordero
Post by: Hornstros on December 05, 2007, 12:22:37 pm
...and Scott is solid even if they aren't playing him.

uhhh....What?
Title: Re: Astros Turned Down Cordero
Post by: VirtualBob on December 05, 2007, 12:55:57 pm
uhhh....What?

Don't go there.

Please!
Title: Re: Astros Turned Down Cordero
Post by: GreatBagwellsBeard on December 05, 2007, 02:47:43 pm
Don't go there.

Please!

SUMMON THE KRACKEN!
Title: Re: Astros Turned Down Cordero
Post by: dirty steve on December 05, 2007, 03:50:43 pm
This was discussed yesterday.
i was thinking the same thing.