OrangeWhoopass.com Forums

General Discussion => Talk Zone => Topic started by: pravata on November 14, 2007, 10:06:41 am

Title: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: pravata on November 14, 2007, 10:06:41 am
Rosenthal, today,  Closer Francisco Cordero already has received a four-year offer from an unidentified team, an unidentified G.M. says,  Link (http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7445434)

Yesterday, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Melvin said he wouldn't reveal specific offers he makes this off-season but confirmed he put in a bid to retain free-agent closer Francisco Cordero.

Cordero, 32, is believed to be seeking at least $40 million over four years but Melvin might not be willing to go that high. Link (http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=685918)
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: kevwun on November 14, 2007, 10:54:38 am
I think that should eliminate the Astros and I'm glad.  He's not worth that because he's far from a sure thing.  I'd rather limp through next year with the young guys or someone else they bring in.  It wasn't so very long ago that he was a throw-in by the Rangers in the Carlos Lee trade.
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: Duman on November 14, 2007, 01:01:04 pm
I think that should eliminate the Astros and I'm glad.  He's not worth that because he's far from a sure thing.  I'd rather limp through next year with the young guys or someone else they bring in.  It wasn't so very long ago that he was a throw-in by the Rangers in the Carlos Lee trade.

I am amazed that prices closers are getting.  It began with the 7 million the Tigers gave Todd Jones who is old and broke down.  I don't think closer is that specialized of a skill as evidenced by the number of new closers who come out of know where every year and do well.
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: Fredia on November 14, 2007, 01:11:04 pm
I am amazed that prices closers are getting.  It began with the 7 million the Tigers gave Todd Jones who is old and broke down.  I don't think closer is that specialized of a skill as evidenced by the number of new closers who come out of know where every year and do well.
just goes to show (unless a very speical occassion) that the day of the complete game is past
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: Sleepy on November 15, 2007, 07:17:47 pm
Althought I'm not a complete Billy Beane follower, I like his philosophy of growing closers and trading them to teams for more value than they're actually worth.  This is different, of course, but I don't see the gap between what the Astros have and what Cordero brings as worth the difference in cash-money.
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: hillbillyken on November 15, 2007, 07:37:29 pm
the save is an over rated stat! a ranger picther got a save in the 30 somthing to 3 game? what the?????
middle relief is cheaper and just as important, how many game are won and lost in the 6th and 7th?
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: ValpoCory on November 15, 2007, 11:42:19 pm
the save is an over rated stat! a ranger picther got a save in the 30 somthing to 3 game? what the?????
middle relief is cheaper and just as important, how many game are won and lost in the 6th and 7th?


The best closers in baseball sometimes are not among MLB's Top 5 Saves leaders.   Saves leaders often have managers who help them get saves ... holding the closer in a 4 run game until 2 runners reach, 1 out saves with a 5 run lead, etc.  Give me a guy like Papelbon who can get a 5-out save with 2 on in the 8th in a one run game. 

Pass on Cordero at that price.
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: JimR on November 16, 2007, 12:50:52 pm
the save is an over rated stat! a ranger picther got a save in the 30 somthing to 3 game? what the?????
middle relief is cheaper and just as important, how many game are won and lost in the 6th and 7th?


only is a saves leader gets saves like that. i doubt many top closers do. those are Trever Miller saves.
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: S.P. Rodriguez on November 16, 2007, 01:02:28 pm
Thought I'd share this nugget.  I read the chat log for Keith Law over at ESPN (void related) and he's indicating Houston is the leader for Cordero.  Says Houston will also overpay to get him. 

Don't get me wrong, I don't believe him.  Just thought I'd share.
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: pravata on November 16, 2007, 01:03:03 pm
Thought I'd share this nugget.  I read the chat log for Keith Law over at ESPN (void related) and he's indicating Houston is the leader for Cordero.  Says Houston will also overpay to get him. 

Don't get me wrong, I don't believe him.  Just thought I'd share.

4 years 11?  Really?
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: Noe on November 16, 2007, 01:05:51 pm
Thought I'd share this nugget.  I read the chat log for Keith Law over at ESPN (void related) and he's indicating Houston is the leader for Cordero.  Says Houston will also overpay to get him. 

Don't get me wrong, I don't believe him.  Just thought I'd share.

I think Cordero will stay with Milwaukee who will be forced to overpay.  I firmly believe it's Qualls to start the season if someone else does not beat him out in spring training.  Sarfate or Paulino is the only two I can think of that have a chance to do that.
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: S.P. Rodriguez on November 16, 2007, 01:11:56 pm
I think Cordero will stay with Milwaukee who will be forced to overpay.  I firmly believe it's Qualls to start the season if someone else does not beat him out in spring training.  Sarfate or Paulino is the only two I can think of that have a chance to do that.

I'm betting that Albers is moved to the pen.  However, that depends on Houston having better options (Oswalt, Backe, Sampson, Wandy, Woody, Patton etc...)  to start and those options don't falter in ST.
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: Jacksonian on November 16, 2007, 01:14:35 pm
I'm betting that Albers is moved to the pen.  However, that depends on Houston having better options (Oswalt, Backe, Sampson, Wandy, Woody, Patton etc...)  to start and those options don't falter in ST.

I'm betting my wooden nickel that if the Astros deal for starting pitching, they will include Albers in the trade.
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: jaklewein on November 16, 2007, 02:06:13 pm
I'm betting my wooden nickel that if the Astros deal for starting pitching, they will include Albers in the trade.

Anyone wanna take a shot at who Wade might be after in terms of SP?  Also...how much do you think they're willing to give up in terms of propects?

I keep reading that Haren/Blanton are available...either would be nice...Not that Burke has done anything to say he'd be better than Mark Ellis, but I wonder if he any value to the A's?  Just a thought...nice to fantasize I guess.

ETA...obviously my hope would be for Burke to be a small piece of any deal with Oakland.  Big time prospects (starting with Patton I'm sure) would have to be added and I'm not sure we have enough to make such a deal.
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: TheWizard on November 17, 2007, 11:08:09 am
Anyone wanna take a shot at who Wade might be after in terms of SP?  Also...how much do you think they're willing to give up in terms of propects?

I keep reading that Haren/Blanton are available...either would be nice...Not that Burke has done anything to say he'd be better than Mark Ellis, but I wonder if he any value to the A's?  Just a thought...nice to fantasize I guess.

ETA...obviously my hope would be for Burke to be a small piece of any deal with Oakland.  Big time prospects (starting with Patton I'm sure) would have to be added and I'm not sure we have enough to make such a deal.
I'm also curious what trade value, if any, Burke has to other teams.  I'm so used to him being toted as the "2B of the future" around here.
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: Andyzipp on November 17, 2007, 08:12:56 pm
I'm also curious what trade value, if any, Burke has to other teams.  I'm so used to him being toted as the "2B of the future" around here.

Around here meaning Houston?  Only by Richard Justice and Tim Purpura.  And I guess Lance Berkman.
Around here mean OWA?  I can't recall the last time I saw anyone claiming that was the direction the team was going.
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: otterjb on November 18, 2007, 03:31:31 am
JimR et al. had Burke pegged right from the getgo...
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: Mr. Happy on November 18, 2007, 11:01:38 am
JimR et al. had Burke pegged right from the getgo...

Yep. Coach nailed Burke. I haven't seen anything out of Burke than Coach didn't already say.
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: TheWizard on November 18, 2007, 02:14:11 pm
Around here meaning Houston?  Only by Richard Justice and Tim Purpura.  And I guess Lance Berkman.
Around here mean OWA?  I can't recall the last time I saw anyone claiming that was the direction the team was going.
No no, sorry for being ambiguous.  I meant Purpura, Justice and Co.  Definitely didn't mean around OWA.
Title: Re: Reds/F. Cordero reach preliminary agreement
Post by: dirty steve on November 23, 2007, 03:50:15 pm
sounds like cordero is OK with dusty baker ruining his arm also.  this one came out of nowhere.

"The Cincinnati Reds, making their first big acquisition of the Dusty Baker era, have reached a preliminary agreement with free-agent closer Francisco Cordero on a four-year, $46-million contract, major-league sources say.
The deal, which is pending a physical, includes a club option for a fifth year that can bring the total value of the package to $57 million.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7480854
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: I'm Richies Dad on November 23, 2007, 04:44:54 pm
Wow, that is  surprising that the Reds would tie up so much of the total payroll in one player.
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: MikeyBoy on November 23, 2007, 10:28:52 pm
sounds like cordero is OK with dusty baker ruining his arm also. 

Do you have any proof that Dusty Baker has ruined even one pitcher's arm?
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: dirty steve on November 24, 2007, 01:07:29 am
Do you have any proof that Dusty Baker has ruined even one pitcher's arm?
your joking right?
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: MikeyBoy on November 24, 2007, 08:03:44 am
your joking right?

Nope.
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: das on November 26, 2007, 09:32:34 am
Wow, that is  surprising that the Reds would tie up so much of the total payroll in one player.
I'm glad the Astros were unsuccessful with their "very aggressive offer" for Cordero.
http://www.orangewhoopass.com/forums/index.php?topic=104385.0
I saw his fastball get *very* straight sometimes with the Nats.  Hitters would be surprised by it and react late.  MLB hitters don't remain surprised for very long.  He could be #2 in a million and turn out to be the next Wagner but my guess is he'll be a non-factor by the end of that nice 4-year contract.
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: Zac D on November 26, 2007, 10:32:44 am
I'm glad the Astros were unsuccessful with their "very aggressive offer" for Cordero.
http://www.orangewhoopass.com/forums/index.php?topic=104385.0
I saw his fastball get *very* straight sometimes with the Nats.

Wrong Cordero?
Title: Re: Francisco Cordero bidding
Post by: das on November 26, 2007, 11:27:29 am
Wrong Cordero?
Oops, read more, post less...  ***slowly backs away from the keyboard***