OrangeWhoopass.com Forums

General Discussion => Talk Zone => Topic started by: TheWizard on November 05, 2007, 09:16:47 am

Title: Lincecum?
Post by: TheWizard on November 05, 2007, 09:16:47 am
Didn't see anything posted on this.  I found this interesting about the GM meeting coming up.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7400932

Quote
The Giants have even let it be known that Tim Lincecum, their No. 1 pick in 2006, can be had for a quality bat.

Any relevance to this?  I think Lincecum will be a stud.
Title: Re: Lincecum?
Post by: MusicMan on November 05, 2007, 09:26:21 am
"Can be had for a quality bat."

Berkman and Lee have no-trade.  Don't see the Grocer moving PENCE!!!

So... no.
Title: Re: Lincecum?
Post by: Andyzipp on November 05, 2007, 09:28:29 am
"Can be had for a quality bat."

Berkman and Lee have no-trade.  Don't see the Grocer moving PENCE!!!

So... no.

I have it on good authority that Luke Scott owns many quality bats. 
Title: Re: Lincecum?
Post by: TheWizard on November 05, 2007, 09:29:10 am
"Can be had for a quality bat."

Berkman and Lee have no-trade.  Don't see the Grocer moving PENCE!!!

So... no.
I figure that too. 

I think I'd seriously consider moving PENCE!!! to get a young pitcher like Lincecum, but I don't think there's any way McLane would allow that.  Considering the way Hunter is cheered, he may as well have a no-trade clause.  And I'm not a GM, that's another important point.
Title: Re: Lincecum?
Post by: MusicMan on November 05, 2007, 09:32:02 am
I have it on good authority that Luke Scott owns many quality bats. 

Luke Scott for Tim Lincecum, even as a starting point, would be an Executive of the Year type of deal.
Title: Re: Lincecum?
Post by: Andyzipp on November 05, 2007, 09:34:42 am
Luke Scott for Tim Lincecum, even as a starting point, would be an Executive of the Year type of deal.

Throw in Orlando Palmerio too.

Although, I don't know how Tal and Wade are planning to get Santana and Willis now.
Title: Re: Lincecum?
Post by: MusicMan on November 05, 2007, 09:38:36 am
Throw in Orlando Palmerio too.

Although, I don't know how Tal and Wade are planning to get Santana and Willis now.

Santana will don the blood'n'mud in exchange for Chris Burke, Matt Albers, Eric Ireland, and Eric Idle.
Title: Re: Lincecum?
Post by: Fredia on November 05, 2007, 12:04:32 pm
"Can be had for a quality bat."

Berkman and Lee have no-trade.  Don't see the Grocer moving PENCE!!!

So... no.
pence =tickets sold with not much salary paid.. i dont see him going either
Title: Re: Lincecum?
Post by: JackAstro on November 05, 2007, 01:14:46 pm
pence =tickets sold with not much salary paid.. i dont see him going either

This statement is cogent, relevant, accurate, and contains no misspellings. Who are you, and what have you done with our Fredia?
Title: Re: Lincecum?
Post by: Limey on November 05, 2007, 01:20:19 pm
This statement is cogent, relevant, accurate, and contains no misspellings. Who are you, and what have you done with our Fredia?

There was no capitalisation.  It's pravata.
Title: Re: Lincecum?
Post by: Taras Bulba on November 05, 2007, 01:57:24 pm
There was no capitalisation.  It's pravata.

If you ever type "capitalization," we'll know that Ashcroft finally caught up to you and  cut your throat, and that the terrorists have won and are in control of your keyboard.
Title: Re: Lincecum?
Post by: Limey on November 05, 2007, 01:59:34 pm
If you ever type "capitalization," we'll know that Ashcroft finally caught up to you and  cut your throat, and that the terrorists have won and are in control of your keyboard.

I am the canary in the mine.
Title: Re: Lincecum?
Post by: Taras Bulba on November 05, 2007, 02:07:58 pm
I am the canary in the mine.

Yes, or if Hudson Hawk suddenly declares his affection for the entire line of Sam Adams products.  Then, we'll surely know.
Title: Re: Lincecum?
Post by: pravata on November 05, 2007, 03:45:58 pm
Didn't see anything posted on this.  I found this interesting about the GM meeting coming up.
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7400932

Any relevance to this?  I think Lincecum will be a stud.

Against the Astros, yes.
Title: Re: Lincecum?
Post by: DVauthrin on November 05, 2007, 03:56:02 pm
the giants would be stupid to deal him.   They should've just built their rotation around cain and lincecum and let someone else win the zito sweepstakes, but now because they have that horrible contract they have to put their cheaper younger, better pitcher/s on the block for offensive help.