i was listening to carl dukes... this morning, i guess, and he gave a jury's still out assessment of luke scott in terms of 2007. he's now the second local guy to do so (the other being our BFF, justice).
now, i know; combine both of their baseball IQs, etc., etc... but it did make me wonder if they were maybe getting that vibe from the organization?
so what IS the consensus? just among us? is it rigoddamndiculous for us to expect him to be productive again next year as we move forward and reshape this roster? (not AS productive, of course?)
i see a guy, numbers aside (though they remain impressive and... he just hit a bases-loaded triple!), who seems extremely confident at the plate. he rarely seems to get cheated and it's even rarer for him to look overmatched. and he seems to consistently drive the ball. i felt, btw, none of these things about jason lane last year, if that's, by chance, the reason for the "wait and see..." approach.
personally, i think he?s a lock entering 2007, but am i the only one?