Author Topic: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum  (Read 5127 times)

Nate Colbert

  • Pope
  • Posts: 7221
    • View Profile
Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« on: December 05, 2018, 01:29:43 pm »
or so says Jayson Stark:

Quote
At last month’s owners meetings, baseball’s competition committee gave the commissioner “strong” backing to try to “put something in place” to limit shifts, according to sources who spoke directly with members of the committee. So next up, it’s time to run this – and more – past the players’ union.

He quotes a front office person saying it's a slam dunk as far as getting approval from the players.

Also says pitch clock likely to be...pitched as well to the union.

Totally unknown as to what the new shift rules might look like but Stark thinks the most likely approach would be a rule requiring two infielders on each side of 2nd base.

BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2018, 01:47:11 pm »
I disagree with the shift banning.  That just means hitters need to adjust.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2018, 02:42:10 pm by BudGirl »
''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

BUWebguy

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2118
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2018, 02:04:13 pm »
Keith Olbermann's response:

Quote
“The shift” has been around since 1875. So naturally ban it, which will require some equivalent to an illegal defense rule, which will mean more replays, which will mean - what? Outs overturned? Which will mean LONGER DAMN GAMES.

I hadn't thought about that possible income -- guys waiting as close as possible to whatever line is drawn, then trying to run over to the other side. Could MLB end up with its own version of offsides and false starts? Will that be reviewable?
"If you can't figure out that Astros doesn't have an apostrophe, you shouldn't be able to comment." - Ron Brand, June 9, 2010

Bench

  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16476
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2018, 02:13:16 pm »
Keith Olbermann's response:

I hadn't thought about that possible income -- guys waiting as close as possible to whatever line is drawn, then trying to run over to the other side. Could MLB end up with its own version of offsides and false starts? Will that be reviewable?

It sounds stupid and frankly I am surprised that it would be a "slam dunk" with the players.
"Holy shit, Mozart. Get me off this fucking thing."

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2018, 02:38:58 pm »
Total bullshit.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

moriartp

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3203
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2018, 02:54:29 pm »
Counterproductive nonsense. I guess a simple "two infielders each side of second" rule wouldn't cause too much of a problem, but that's mostly because it wouldn't make too much of a difference.

But really, it's hard to express how dumb this is. If you want more action on balls in play, un-juice the ball. When you make it too easy to hit a home run, everyone swings for a damned home run.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2018, 03:07:44 pm by moriartp »

doyce7

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3106
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #6 on: December 05, 2018, 02:56:51 pm »
Some guys suck at hitting the other way so ban shifts
Some guys suck at making free throws, make fouls an automatic 2 points
Soccer needs more scoring so hitting the post or crossbar is now a goal


You don't make rule changes because players suck at something. Make the players adjust/work hard to get better.

Just my 2 cents

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk


BudGirl

  • Contributor
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 17776
  • Brad Ausmus' Slave
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #7 on: December 05, 2018, 03:35:21 pm »
Some guys suck at hitting the other way so ban shifts
Some guys suck at making free throws, make fouls an automatic 2 points
Soccer needs more scoring so hitting the post or crossbar is now a goal


You don't make rule changes because players suck at something. Make the players adjust/work hard to get better.

Just my 2 cents

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk



The NFL may not do much right, but they did good by moving the extra point back.  That's changed so many games now.  It was easy so they made it harder.

''I just did an interview with someone I like more than you. I used a lot of big words on him. I don't have anything left for you.'' --Brad Ausmus

Well behaved women rarely make history.

HudsonHawk

  • Administrator
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 42689
  • Gentleman About Town
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #8 on: December 05, 2018, 06:03:51 pm »
Some guys suck at hitting the other way so ban shifts
Some guys suck at making free throws, make fouls an automatic 2 points
Soccer needs more scoring so hitting the post or crossbar is now a goal


You don't make rule changes because players suck at something. Make the players adjust/work hard to get better.

Just my 2 cents

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

This is a great strategy until people start changing the channel.  You have to balance your sense of purity with professional baseball's primary purpose, which is to entice viewership and make money.  Not that I advocate banning the shift, but rules have changed many times over the years with that in mind.
The rules of distinction were thrown out with the baseball cap.  It does not lend itself to protocol.  It is found today on youth in homes, classrooms, even in fine restaurants.  Regardless of its other consequences, this is a breach against civility.  A civilized man should avoid this mania.

Col. Sphinx Drummond

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16760
  • art is a bulwark against the irrationality of man
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #9 on: December 05, 2018, 06:34:54 pm »
When you add beans to chili, it is no longer chili. If you change the game than it ceases to be the game.
Everyone's talking, few of them know
The rest are pretending, they put on a show
And if there's a message I guess this is it
Truth isn't easy, the easy part's shit

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #10 on: December 05, 2018, 06:54:30 pm »
Keith Olbermann's response:

I hadn't thought about that possible income -- guys waiting as close as possible to whatever line is drawn, then trying to run over to the other side. Could MLB end up with its own version of offsides and false starts? Will that be reviewable?

It will be as stupid and as inconsistently enforced as the old NBA "illegal defense" rule.
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #11 on: December 05, 2018, 11:28:35 pm »
When you add beans to chili, it is no longer chili. If you change the game than it ceases to be the game.
See hitter, designated
Up in the Air

Lefty

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3539
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #12 on: December 06, 2018, 12:51:38 am »
You may ask yourself, "How do I work this?"

Lefty

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3539
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #13 on: December 06, 2018, 12:53:19 am »
It will be as stupid and as inconsistently enforced as the old NBA "illegal defense" rule.
I'm thinking more of the "illegal shift" penalty in football.  Do they have to be set until the pitch is released?
You may ask yourself, "How do I work this?"

Col. Sphinx Drummond

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16760
  • art is a bulwark against the irrationality of man
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #14 on: December 06, 2018, 07:48:25 am »
See hitter, designated
The pitcher is not banned from hitting.
Everyone's talking, few of them know
The rest are pretending, they put on a show
And if there's a message I guess this is it
Truth isn't easy, the easy part's shit

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
forever is composed entirely of nows

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #16 on: December 07, 2018, 01:36:38 pm »
The pitcher is not banned from hitting.
No, but the pinch hitter is allowed to come to the plate multiple times over multiple innings without affecting the pitcher's ability to stay in the game.  Thus, a "change".
Up in the Air

Navin R Johnson

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 4882
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #17 on: December 08, 2018, 11:59:12 am »
Speaking of rules, was chatting with someone who thinks there a possibility of some tech getting introduced into the game. As in a way for pitchers and catchers to communicate without having to worry about other teams stealing signs.

She said that all teams are using tech to steal signs.  It’s becoming a real issue.  She said at least one of Maldanados passed balls In the playoffs was due to a cross up, because the signs have become so ridiculous due to knowing other teams are using new means to steal signs.

Said it could well be addressed at the winter meetings.   Had this conversation about a month ago, but hadn’t heard or read anything about that since.
There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.

das

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3465
    • View Profile
    • Faith Home Ministries
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #18 on: December 08, 2018, 12:58:23 pm »
Speaking of rules, was chatting with someone who thinks there a possibility of some tech getting introduced into the game. As in a way for pitchers and catchers to communicate without having to worry about other teams stealing signs.

She said that all teams are using tech to steal signs.  It’s becoming a real issue.  She said at least one of Maldanados passed balls In the playoffs was due to a cross up, because the signs have become so ridiculous due to knowing other teams are using new means to steal signs.

Said it could well be addressed at the winter meetings.   Had this conversation about a month ago, but hadn’t heard or read anything about that since.

Verlander mentioned it around a month ago as well. He used the NFL quarterback analogy. Said it would make the game safer (crossups), shorten the game (less mound visits) and would help stop the spying shenanigans.
Another trenchant comment by a jealous lesser intellect.

Lefty

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3539
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #19 on: December 08, 2018, 01:29:23 pm »
Verlander mentioned it around a month ago as well. He used the NFL quarterback analogy. Said it would make the game safer (crossups), shorten the game (less mound visits) and would help stop the spying shenanigans.

I love this idea.
You may ask yourself, "How do I work this?"

BlownRanger

  • Prime Time Player
  • Posts: 661
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #20 on: December 10, 2018, 09:18:25 am »
Heard part of a Reid Ryan interview on the radio this morning.  Surprised to hear he's a strong proponent of the "Start Extra Innings With a Runner on 2nd Base" rule.
"He hit that one right up the poop chute, Bill" - Enos Cabell

toddthebod

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3385
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #21 on: December 10, 2018, 09:46:56 am »
Reid Ryan was on MLB Network Radio on Sunday.  He pretty much said that baseball needs to give fans what they want, whatever they want.  So if fans want more offense, then MLB should do what they can do.  He was also very supportive of the pitch clock and the extra innings rule that puts a runner on second. 
Boom!

chuck

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12495
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #22 on: December 10, 2018, 09:50:05 am »
Reid Ryan was on MLB Network Radio on Sunday.  He pretty much said that baseball needs to give fans what they want, whatever they want.  So if fans want more offense, then MLB should do what they can do.  He was also very supportive of the pitch clock and the extra innings rule that puts a runner on second.

That's a perfect attitude for someone who works at Nordstrom.
Y todo lo que sube baja
pregúntale a Pedro Navaja

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #23 on: December 10, 2018, 10:09:45 am »
That's a perfect attitude for someone who works at Nordstrom.

And I would not invest in Nordstom.

das

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3465
    • View Profile
    • Faith Home Ministries
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #24 on: December 10, 2018, 10:17:08 am »
Reid Ryan was on MLB Network Radio on Sunday.  He pretty much said that baseball needs to give fans what they want, whatever they want.  So if fans want more offense, then MLB should do what they can do.  He was also very supportive of the pitch clock and the extra innings rule that puts a runner on second.

We see this in the tech business sometimes.  CX/UX run amok.  The notion of giving people what/anything they want leads to horrible customer experiences.  "I want salty, greasy food delivered to my laz-y-boy 3 meals a day and chocolate cake for my two snacks" leads to poor outcomes.  Because, you know, the customer dies pretty quick. 

A very valuable part of good CX/UX is letting the product experts have a viable voice in the product construction and delivery.  Without that expertise to compliment customer desires, you get descending gibberish for a product.

Edited to add; all you have to do is look at contemporary news outlets to see a good analog of this progression.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2018, 10:19:46 am by das »
Another trenchant comment by a jealous lesser intellect.

TerryPuhl21

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1397
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #25 on: December 10, 2018, 11:56:35 am »
Reid Ryan was on MLB Network Radio on Sunday.  He pretty much said that baseball needs to give fans what they want, whatever they want.  So if fans want more offense, then MLB should do what they can do.  He was also very supportive of the pitch clock and the extra innings rule that puts a runner on second.
Reid was really talked about pretty harshly after his interview was over, and then again just a few minutes ago on Steve Phillips show, for suggesting that teams should be compensated when their front office personnel is raided by another team. He made that comment when discussing Elias, Fast and Sig. The overwhelming feeling was that if Houston wanted to keep those guys they should have paid up, and that their absence was really going to be felt by Jeff and the organization, so much so that it could be impacting what moves the Astros do or don’t make this off season.

As for Reid’s comments about rule changes, sure, I love the game as it is but most these things are not deal breakers for me personally. Half the stands empty when a game goes into extra innings. While I love an 18 inning game, most can’t hang with that, either in person or on tv. Starting the 11th with a runner on second base to help end the game sooner and preserve pitcher’s arms is understandable and not a detriment to the game in my opinion. The NFL and NHL have each altered the OT for regular season play. It didn’t destroy those sports.

I do disagree with some of the shift banning talk. Telling a team where they can and can’t play their defensive players seems like a step too far. I MIGHT be willing to live with all infielders on the dirt but you could align them anyway you want, but again, I’d prefer for the hitters, who are supposed to be professionals, learn how to hit the other way.

I love the pitch clock. When you see some of our guys come up from the minors, like C Perez, and they are used to that and pitch with that quicker pace, I love it.

DH?? I could live with it either way but please make a decision. Both leagues need to play by the same rules!!!! Could you image flipping a coin before the super bowl to determine home team and that coin toss determined whether or not one team could use their running back?? Sorry Rams. You lose the toss so Todd Gurley can’t play. I still find it hard to believe this was ever allowed in baseball. The players union will never allow it to be done away with so the NL needs to get on board. DH today please so we can play by the same rules.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #26 on: December 10, 2018, 12:04:25 pm »
You are fucking crazy for agreeing with the 11th rule. Fucking crazy.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

TerryPuhl21

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 1397
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #27 on: December 10, 2018, 12:17:17 pm »
You are fucking crazy for agreeing with the 11th rule. Fucking crazy.
I don’t say it was my preference, just that I could live with it. An 18 inning game is fine with me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Astros Fan in Big D

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 10331
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #28 on: December 10, 2018, 04:15:39 pm »
They'll start this nonsense in the 11th, then move it to the 10th when tv numbers don't look like they want.

Tom Servo

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3152
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #29 on: December 10, 2018, 04:48:35 pm »
Back to the shift banning, I saw an interesting take on it from Twitter:  Grounding out into the shift is the penalty for selling out for power in the age of the launch angle craze.  If you ban the shift, you take that penalty away, thus increasing selling out for pull power.  This will further increase strikeouts and reduce balls in play.

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #30 on: December 10, 2018, 05:09:34 pm »
Things are good in the game and the business of baseball. No rule changes are necessary. In fact, they are a dumb idea. And catering to the whims of fans is really scary to me.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2018, 05:14:30 pm by juliogotay »

Col. Sphinx Drummond

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 16760
  • art is a bulwark against the irrationality of man
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #31 on: December 10, 2018, 05:53:01 pm »
They'll start this nonsense in the 11th, then move it to the 10th when tv numbers don't look like they want.
First they came for...
Everyone's talking, few of them know
The rest are pretending, they put on a show
And if there's a message I guess this is it
Truth isn't easy, the easy part's shit

doyce7

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3106
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #32 on: December 10, 2018, 05:57:55 pm »
Back to the shift banning, I saw an interesting take on it from Twitter:  Grounding out into the shift is the penalty for selling out for power in the age of the launch angle craze.  If you ban the shift, you take that penalty away, thus increasing selling out for pull power.  This will further increase strikeouts and reduce balls in play.
This, is a great point

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk


Astros Fan in Big D

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 10331
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #33 on: December 10, 2018, 08:05:56 pm »
Back to the shift banning, I saw an interesting take on it from Twitter:  Grounding out into the shift is the penalty for selling out for power in the age of the launch angle craze.  If you ban the shift, you take that penalty away, thus increasing selling out for pull power.  This will further increase strikeouts and reduce balls in play.

Just how many times can Joey Gallo strike out?

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #34 on: December 10, 2018, 08:15:01 pm »
Just how many times can Joey Gallo strike out?

Not enough as far as I'm concerned.

austro

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • Illuminati
  • Posts: 19637
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #35 on: December 10, 2018, 08:44:26 pm »
Just how many times can Joey Gallo strike out?

Are you familiar with the Ackermann function?
I remember all the good times me 'n Miller enjoyed
Up and down the M1 in some luminous yo-yo toy
But the future has to change - and to change I've got to destroy
Oh look out Lennon here I come - land ahoy-hoy-hoy

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #36 on: December 10, 2018, 09:23:31 pm »
"I want salty, greasy food delivered to my laz-y-boy 3 meals a day and chocolate cake for my two snacks" leads to poor outcomes.  Because, you know, the customer dies pretty quick.

This puts a whole new spin on maximizing customer life time value.
Up in the Air

Astros Fan in Big D

  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 10331
    • View Profile
Re: Shift-Banning Proposal Gaining Momentum
« Reply #37 on: December 10, 2018, 10:09:11 pm »
Are you familiar with the Ackermann function?

I also would have accepted "How many ABs does he have?  That many."