I wonder what the guys at FJM will say about this?
"Documented liar" is a little strong. Morgan mixed together two factual events from his past, from over forty years ago. It happens. I would guess most people have done this a time or two, just sitting around reminiscing.
He is imprecise, perhaps. Being a journalist (after a fashion), Morgan
is open to accusations of being less than careful with the facts.
As for the rest of the article, any epithet against the steaming pile of crap that is ESPN and all its offshoots is fine by me.