I think Harper is way better than you describe, but I personally don't want him, as he hasn't shown that he elevates a club much. They'd also need to add more mirrors in the clubhouse.
Well, I may have exaggerated a little bit. I would give you Fisher for him, but I stand by my statement of his being the most overrated and overhyped player in the game. If he gets 350 million then Trout and Altuve are worth 450. They are much better players and so are many others and the Astros shouldn’t trade for him if the Nationals do announce they will take offers.
Back to the original question, Washington SHOULD try to move him and get something for him. They can always resign him in the off season and Harper would understand what the Nationals would be trying to accomplish if they did that. In my opinion, they would be stupid not to move him but I bet he stays put.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk