Author Topic: Astros agree to terms with Brocail  (Read 5023 times)

Crusher_Joe

  • Disappointing Rookie
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
"You know what the chain of command is?  It's the chain I beat you with to show you who's in command!" - Jayne Cobb

Greg

  • Roster Filler
  • Posts: 151
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2007, 09:43:38 pm »
Good.

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2007, 10:33:22 pm »
Nice to add a veteran presence in the pen.
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Reuben

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8852
    • View Profile
    • art
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2007, 11:33:56 pm »
bullpen's starting to get a little crowded...
"Come check us out in the Game Zone. We don’t bite. Unless you say something idiotic." -Mr. Happy

Waldo

  • Administrator
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6506
    • View Profile
    • http://www.ashrubbery.com/
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2007, 12:33:41 am »
Good.  Maybe he'll actually throw a pitch in a Houston uni this time.

Is he the only DLed player to get tossed from a game?

Craig

  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 3289
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2007, 02:55:44 am »
Good.  Maybe he'll actually throw a pitch in a Houston uni this time.

Is he the only DLed player to get tossed from a game?

Gagne did it a couple of years ago too.

Froback

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2253
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2007, 08:47:23 am »
Just running through names in my head for the BP, obviously nothing is guaranteed:

Qualls (probably best of remaining last year's pen)
Villiareal (acquire via trade from Atl)
Brocail (just signed, based on this thread)
Geary (acquired via trade from Phi)
Sarfate (did well for Houston, erratic for Mil)
----------------
Nieve (DLed last year, out of options, I think)
Albers (Not sure options status, rotation looks like might push him to BP)
Sampson (Not sure options status, was on yo-yo last year, but might fill Moehler role)
Borkowski (did pitch in 64 games last year)
McLemore (Lefty option)
Paulino (late season call-up 07)
Gutierrez (late season call-up 07)

Not sure if I missed someone, but I think I addressed all who are on 40-man who are potentials to make bullpen.  I didn't include Patton cause I think he is a starter either in Hou or in RR.

The line is where I cut-off the probables to the maybes.  With a 12 man staff, that leaves 2 spots left outside of my probables and barring trading some of them away.

VirtualBob

  • Pope
  • Posts: 5630
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #7 on: November 27, 2007, 08:48:17 am »
Good.

For what?  I didn't think anything could make me a Brian Moehler fan, but even he is likely to be less worse than Brocail.  Isn't Brocail older than Jim R???
Up in the Air

GreatBagwellsBeard

  • Contributor
  • Key Member of the Conspiracy
  • Posts: 2990
  • The damn paterfamilias
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #8 on: November 27, 2007, 09:01:25 am »
While it'd be really surprising if he put up similar numbers, I could see Brocail as bringing a Springer-esque presence to an otherwise very young pen.  Good character pickup.

SmithWade seems to be focusing on filling very specific holes so far this off-season.  We may not know who the 2B or no. 2 starter is, but the roster will be very complete otherwise.  It stands in contrast to the overlapping, sporadic roster management we had last year, where depth at certain positions meant that some players (Lamb, Bruntlett) got buried unnecessarily, while there were gaping wounds elsewhere (7th inning, starting pitching).

The hits keep coming...
Drinking for two.

“I want to paint a mural of Houston for the kids, but I’m terrible at drawing swamp humidity"

Bob Sakamano

  • Disappointing Rookie
  • Posts: 82
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #9 on: November 27, 2007, 09:19:34 am »
Quote
For what?  I didn't think anything could make me a Brian Moehler fan, but even he is likely to be less worse than Brocail.  Isn't Brocail older than Jim R???

I know he's 40 and could fall off the cliff at any point, but Brocail is coming off a season where he went 5-1 with a 3.05 ERA in 76 innings. That's far superior to Moehler. And before anyone mentions Petco as the reason, he was actually much better on the road.

Not to say I expect the same kind of production here, but he has the potential to be solid.

I'm Richies Dad

  • Veteran Role Player
  • Posts: 292
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #10 on: November 27, 2007, 09:26:12 am »
My guess is that Borkowski moves on.  I can't imagine there would be any compensation, but Brocail was not type B was he?

Froback

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2253
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #11 on: November 27, 2007, 09:31:03 am »
My guess is that Borkowski moves on.  I can't imagine there would be any compensation, but Brocail was not type B was he?
Yes, Brocail was a type B FA.  He was 45th of all NL Relief pitchers (57 were A or B).

MusicMan

  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 25931
  • Thanks for 2015
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #12 on: November 27, 2007, 09:33:40 am »
For what?  I didn't think anything could make me a Brian Moehler fan, but even he is likely to be less worse than Brocail.  Isn't Brocail older than Jim R???

[redacted - hadn't had my coffee yet]

There's no comparison between Brocail and Moehler.
« Last Edit: November 27, 2007, 09:35:50 am by MusicMan »
I believe there ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing AstroTurf and the designated hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft-core pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning rather than Christmas Eve and I believe in long, slow, deep, torture of Bud Selig.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #13 on: November 27, 2007, 09:44:55 am »
Yes, Brocail was a type B FA.  He was 45th of all NL Relief pitchers (57 were A or B).

Which means that even if Brocail were offered arbitration the Astros will not lose a draft pick.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #14 on: November 27, 2007, 09:51:45 am »
For what?  I didn't think anything could make me a Brian Moehler fan, but even he is likely to be less worse than Brocail.  Isn't Brocail older than Jim R???

You're confusing Brocail with Christy Matthewson.
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #15 on: November 27, 2007, 09:55:35 am »
You're confusing Brocail with Christy Matthewson.

nope. i coached Christy in LL.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Froback

  • Should Have Quit 500 Posts Ago
  • Posts: 2253
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #16 on: November 27, 2007, 10:06:42 am »
Which means that even if Brocail were offered arbitration the Astros will not lose a draft pick.
That is correct, SD would get some extra late sandwich round pick, but it doesn't actually cost the Astros anything (other than their pick comes one later in the 3rd? round).

Arky Vaughan

  • Administrator
  • Pope
  • Posts: 6335
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #17 on: November 27, 2007, 10:13:46 am »
nope. i coached Christy in LL.

What was it like to pitch from 50 feet, Jim?

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #18 on: November 27, 2007, 10:23:57 am »
That is correct, SD would get some extra late sandwich round pick, but it doesn't actually cost the Astros anything (other than their pick comes one later in the 3rd? round).

SD would receive a supplemental 1st round pick.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Fredia

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6896
  • Looking forward
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #19 on: November 27, 2007, 10:26:41 am »
Dunno if I'm Cabrera-ing this from NYCU.

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20071126&content_id=2309344&vkey=news_hou&fext=.jsp&c_id=hou&partnered=rss_hou
so i can now get the autograph out i got from him at fan fest. wow what goes around comes around
forever is composed entirely of nows

jbm

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6615
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #20 on: November 27, 2007, 11:34:44 am »
Just running through names in my head for the BP, obviously nothing is guaranteed:

Qualls (probably best of remaining last year's pen)
Villiareal (acquire via trade from Atl)
Brocail (just signed, based on this thread)
Geary (acquired via trade from Phi)
Sarfate (did well for Houston, erratic for Mil)
----------------
Nieve (DLed last year, out of options, I think)
Albers (Not sure options status, rotation looks like might push him to BP)
Sampson (Not sure options status, was on yo-yo last year, but might fill Moehler role)
Borkowski (did pitch in 64 games last year)
McLemore (Lefty option)
Paulino (late season call-up 07)
Gutierrez (late season call-up 07)

Not sure if I missed someone, but I think I addressed all who are on 40-man who are potentials to make bullpen.  I didn't include Patton cause I think he is a starter either in Hou or in RR.

The line is where I cut-off the probables to the maybes.  With a 12 man staff, that leaves 2 spots left outside of my probables and barring trading some of them away.


If the present list of starters includes Oswalt, Rodriguez, Backe and Williams, one one starter spot would be available (assuming no acquisitions).  It would seem that out of Albers, Sampson, Guttierez, Paulino, Patton, and Nieve, only three would make a 12 man staff, or two realistically since at least one lefty will be in the bullpen, or only one on an 11 man staff.  I wonder if some of those guys might be dealt.

Limey

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 32079
  • Tally Ho!
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #21 on: November 27, 2007, 11:44:14 am »

If the present list of starters includes Oswalt, Rodriguez, Backe and Williams, one one starter spot would be available (assuming no acquisitions).  It would seem that out of Albers, Sampson, Guttierez, Paulino, Patton, and Nieve...

You forgot Rajah.
Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen.

Jacksonian

  • Contributor
  • Double Super Secret Pope
  • Posts: 12893
  • Anonymous Source
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #22 on: November 27, 2007, 11:52:55 am »

If the present list of starters includes Oswalt, Rodriguez, Backe and Williams, one one starter spot would be available (assuming no acquisitions).  It would seem that out of Albers, Sampson, Guttierez, Paulino, Patton, and Nieve, only three would make a 12 man staff, or two realistically since at least one lefty will be in the bullpen, or only one on an 11 man staff.  I wonder if some of those guys might be dealt.

I wouldn't presume Wandy has a lock on a starter spot.
Goin' for a bus ride.

Noe

  • Guest
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #23 on: November 27, 2007, 12:05:05 pm »
If the present list of starters includes Oswalt, Rodriguez, Backe and Williams, one one starter spot would be available (assuming no acquisitions).  It would seem that out of Albers, Sampson, Guttierez, Paulino, Patton, and Nieve, only three would make a 12 man staff, or two realistically since at least one lefty will be in the bullpen, or only one on an 11 man staff.  I wonder if some of those guys might be dealt.

Sampson's work last year as a starter was somewhat telling.  Mainly, he doesn't have the sort of stamina to go into the 150+ IPs for a season.  He lost a lot of his ability to keep his sinker sharp for about a month and a half to two months at the end of the season.  His first two months were excellent and then he faded.  So his arsenal of sinkers and sliders seem more of a match for a long reliever role on the team and nothing else (occasional spot starter).  I'd take Nieve and Guiterrez out of the mix for now as well, both are long shots for a major league gig right now.  Patton, Sampson and Paulino seem more realistic in terms of guys who can make the team next year, with Patton perhaps having an outside chance at a fifth starter role.  Albers?  He's likely a tradeable commodity, IMHO.  If Albers is not traded, then Paulino and/or Patton would go to AAA and Albers gets a shot at the bullpen or possibly a fifth starters job.
« Last Edit: November 27, 2007, 12:07:33 pm by Noe in Austin »

jbm

  • Pope
  • Posts: 6615
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #24 on: November 27, 2007, 12:19:26 pm »
Sampson's work last year as a starter was somewhat telling.  Mainly, he doesn't have the sort of stamina to go into the 150+ IPs for a season.  He lost a lot of his ability to keep his sinker sharp for about a month and a half to two months at the end of the season.  His first two months were excellent and then he faded.  So his arsenal of sinkers and sliders seem more of a match for a long reliever role on the team and nothing else (occasional spot starter).  I'd take Nieve and Guiterrez out of the mix for now as well, both are long shots for a major league gig right now.  Patton, Sampson and Paulino seem more realistic in terms of guys who can make the team next year, with Patton perhaps having an outside chance at a fifth starter role.  Albers?  He's likely a tradeable commodity, IMHO.  If Albers is not traded, then Paulino and/or Patton would go to AAA and Albers gets a shot at the bullpen or possibly a fifth starters job.

It will be interesting imo.  I tend to agree about Sampson, or at least the Sampson we saw last year, but he might add a pitch, or simply improve with more experience.  I personally like Albers a lot and still have hope for him, but I can see the club feeling that his inconsistency might be a permanent trait.  I guess the same conclusion could be made about Wandy, as per Jacksonian's observation.  After adding Guttierrez, Nieve and Paulino, the Astros have a glut of question marks.

I wrongly assumed that the bullpen would hold a lot of these question marks.  Recent acquisitions seem to counter that assumption.  It makes sense, just not what I expected.

JimR

  • Contributor
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 29345
    • View Profile
    • McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, LLP
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #25 on: November 27, 2007, 12:22:27 pm »
Sampson's work last year as a starter was somewhat telling.  Mainly, he doesn't have the sort of stamina to go into the 150+ IPs for a season.  He lost a lot of his ability to keep his sinker sharp for about a month and a half to two months at the end of the season.  His first two months were excellent and then he faded.  So his arsenal of sinkers and sliders seem more of a match for a long reliever role on the team and nothing else (occasional spot starter).  I'd take Nieve and Guiterrez out of the mix for now as well, both are long shots for a major league gig right now.  Patton, Sampson and Paulino seem more realistic in terms of guys who can make the team next year, with Patton perhaps having an outside chance at a fifth starter role.  Albers?  He's likely a tradeable commodity, IMHO.  If Albers is not traded, then Paulino and/or Patton would go to AAA and Albers gets a shot at the bullpen or possibly a fifth starters job.

or the stuff. i agree with your assessment of his role.
Often wrong, but never in doubt.

Mr. Happy

  • Fantasy Team Owner
  • High Order of the Ferret
  • *****
  • Posts: 23232
  • It's a beautiful day; let's play two
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #26 on: November 27, 2007, 04:49:48 pm »
nope. i coached Christy in LL.

Where pitchig counts were irrelevant,
People who cannot recognize a palpable absurdity are very much in the way of civilization. Agnes Rupellier

Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius

juliogotay

  • Pope
  • Posts: 8738
    • View Profile
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #27 on: November 27, 2007, 04:59:47 pm »
Sampson's work last year as a starter was somewhat telling.  Mainly, he doesn't have the sort of stamina to go into the 150+ IPs for a season.  He lost a lot of his ability to keep his sinker sharp for about a month and a half to two months at the end of the season.  His first two months were excellent and then he faded.  So his arsenal of sinkers and sliders seem more of a match for a long reliever role on the team and nothing else (occasional spot starter).  I'd take Nieve and Guiterrez out of the mix for now as well, both are long shots for a major league gig right now.  Patton, Sampson and Paulino seem more realistic in terms of guys who can make the team next year, with Patton perhaps having an outside chance at a fifth starter role.  Albers?  He's likely a tradeable commodity, IMHO.  If Albers is not traded, then Paulino and/or Patton would go to AAA and Albers gets a shot at the bullpen or possibly a fifth starters job.


Wasn't Sampson's mid-season slide due to a bum elbow? I thought he was very good when healthy. Then he came back and pitched again before being shut down.

pravata

  • Guest
Re: Astros agree to terms with Brocail
« Reply #28 on: November 27, 2007, 05:07:18 pm »
one-year, $2.5 million contract. The club holds an option for 2009
Link