Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
1
And just like that, even if only a little bit, Trump’s “enemy of the people” rhetoric has been validated in his mind and the minds of those who support him.

Fucking Buzzfeed. What a worthless piece of shit web site.
You warned everyone.
2
Talk Zone / Re: Bryce Harper
« Last post by Sambito Redux on Today at 08:07:17 am »
Are the Astros the mystery team for Harper?  http://totalastros.com/astros-named-mystery-team-in-on-bryce-harper/

Maybe this has been done and dusted awaiting a long time ago --- allowing Jedi Luhn to trade a few of his overstocked pieces?

Kemp, Tucker, Reddick, Stassi, Josh James and Bukauskas plus any takers on AJ Reed/Great white

--- Bring in Harper (OF/DH)
--- Trade for Realmuto (C)
--- Go get the Mets SP Lugo

And we're done.  Maybe a backend bullpen trade, as Obi Wan Crane has suggested?


Lineup

Springer - RF
Altuve - 2B
Harper - DH
Bregman - 3B
Brantley - LF
Correa - SS
Realmuto - C
Gurriel - 1B
Marisnick - CF

WOW!!!!  Go get it done.


Maybe this is why we did not get Goldschmidt, Cruz or do a quick deal for Realmuto (prices continues to decrease presumably)? 

String out BH free agent show, understand the market better through the bidding, and then go in at the end and clean up?
3
Some of the dossier is wrong, but most of it is correct.
4
Beer and Queso / Roger Angell on "Most Important" Vote of His Lifetime
« Last post by moriartp on Yesterday at 09:30:45 pm »
Ronan Farrow?  Never knew he was viewed as knowledgeable on this.

At any rate, Mueller’s statement is pretty damn vague and can be read various ways, at least by a non lawyer like me. Breaking those clauses out into separate sentences would help. Does “regarding MC’s Congressional testimony” apply to both of the things preceding it?  For that matter, after finally reading the article, I’m having trouble squaring just what part of it would fit as “specific statements to the SC’s office.”

At any rate, concluding that Mueller is saying “Trump didn’t direct MC to lie” might be an erroneous conclusion to draw from this statement.

It’s intentionally vague. “Some of the BuzzFeed report is wrong, but we’re not saying which parts.”

ETA: it also pretty clearly means substantial parts of the report are incorrect. I don’t think they’d put out this statement over a minor inaccuracy.
5
And just like that, even if only a little bit, Trump’s “enemy of the people” rhetoric has been validated in his mind and the minds of those who support him.

Fucking Buzzfeed. What a worthless piece of shit web site.
6
Beer and Queso / Re: Roger Angell on "Most Important" Vote of His Lifetime
« Last post by jbm on Yesterday at 08:53:56 pm »
Ronan Farrow?  Never knew he was viewed as knowledgeable on this.

At any rate, Mueller’s statement is pretty damn vague and can be read various ways, at least by a non lawyer like me. Breaking those clauses out into separate sentences would help. Does “regarding MC’s Congressional testimony” apply to both of the things preceding it?  For that matter, after finally reading the article, I’m having trouble squaring just what part of it would fit as “specific statements to the SC’s office.”

At any rate, concluding that Mueller is saying “Trump didn’t direct MC to lie” might be an erroneous conclusion to draw from this statement.
9
"Major" Trump announcement tomorrow at 3pm ET concerning the "Humanitarian" crisis at the border and the shutdown.

Any guesses?

I’ll bet all the money in my pocket he declares a
State of Emergency.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
10
Beer and Queso / Re: Roger Angell on "Most Important" Vote of His Lifetime
« Last post by jbm on Yesterday at 05:58:31 pm »
Not a guess, but it’s going to be self-serving and disingenuous. 

Interesting how his continual spewing of shit has noticeably weakened him. For example, few seem to care about his major “announcement” on this most pressing issue.  His relevance is waning.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10