Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Limey

Pages: 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47
20501
Talk Zone / Re: Same tired topic (Astros TV in Austin/Round Rock)
« on: April 03, 2007, 09:30:55 am »
Ok...submitted an online question to Time Warner to get some clue as to if there will be anything resembling an Astros TV schedule.

Did you use the word "cocksucker"?  I've heard that it helps when dealing with TWC.

20502
Talk Zone / Re: I feel strangely good
« on: April 03, 2007, 09:11:07 am »
Burke should never have been sent.  He held up a looong time to make sure that the ball cleared Wilson, and then it was in shallow left center.  Duffy only had to throw it about 150 feet.  I would have been amazed if they didn't get him.

The Pirates made all the plays that the Astros offered them last night.  They snagged every ball within reach, tagged every boneheaded baserunner and turned all the DPs possible.  The Astros failed to execute a sac bunt, committed the aforementioned boneheaded running errors and had a bona fide, in the box score, error courtesy of Ensberg.  They kept the game close, waited out Oswalt and obliterated the Astros' bullpen.

Good game by the Pirates.  Bad game by the Astros.  Pirates win.  Justice is served.

20503
Talk Zone / Re: I feel strangely good
« on: April 03, 2007, 09:04:56 am »
Nice team loss today.  Hitters, bully, coaches.  Everyone had a hand in the L.

My immediate thought for the title of the game recap that I am not writing was:
"Astros Lidge the Bed"

20504
Game Zone 2007 Archive / Re: Pirates at Astros - 4/2
« on: April 02, 2007, 09:23:42 pm »
Boy, did he hit the snot out of that thing.  How deep was that?

It spoiled some fat cat's dinner in the restaurant.  Watching the reply, the saddie out there bottled the catch and let it clatter around.

20505
Talk Zone / Re: I feel strangely good
« on: April 02, 2007, 09:19:59 pm »
The question is for the first 3 batters, did he look improved at all?  and then just get rattled after the BS? 

I didn't see much different than you described from memory.  Even the same demented bunny-hop when he coughed up the dinger.  Same stressed out look on his face.

20506
Game Zone 2007 Archive / Re: Pirates at Astros - 4/2
« on: April 02, 2007, 06:44:02 pm »
Great....get to watch the Opening Day game on tv, at least, but we get to cut away from baseball....already....to interview Clay walker during the game.

Nice guy, I am sure, but.....WE HAVE BEEN WAITING MONTHS FOR BASEBALL, NOT CMT!

Moreover he jinxed it by predicting a win, thus causing the Pirates' first hit which came seconds later.

20507
Game Zone 2007 Archive / Re: Pirates at Astros - 4/2
« on: April 02, 2007, 06:41:57 pm »
Scott had no business pushing that.

Cheo was pointing at the bag.  I'm guessing that means "stop right here, maign!"

20508
Game Zone 2007 Archive / Re: Pirates at Astros - 4/2
« on: April 02, 2007, 06:40:55 pm »
Couldn't really get a good idea of his jump on the replay, but it wasn't especially shallow or far away. I'll have to assume he got a late start.
Looked like that to me.  Also looked like he had it through one and a half rotations, but dropped it on the last half-roll.

20509
Talk Zone / Fuck You Clay Walker
« on: April 02, 2007, 06:39:35 pm »
"I think the Astros are going to win.  I'm a good luck charm."
 - Clay Walker

Seconds later, Pirates get their first hit.

20510
Game Zone 2007 Archive / Re: Pirates at Astros - 4/2
« on: April 02, 2007, 06:28:05 pm »
Fuckstick Doug Eddings stationed at 3rd. Lets see if he can make himself part of the game.
At least he doesn't make it behind HP this series.

20511
Talk Zone / Re: Adam Everett in the 2 spot
« on: April 02, 2007, 04:41:38 pm »
This should more correctly read:

Biggio
Adam "Glasser" Everett
Berkman
Lee
Ensberg
Scott
Burke
Ausmus
Oswalt

20512
Game Zone 2007 Archive / Pirates at Astros - 4/2
« on: April 02, 2007, 04:40:22 pm »
Astros' starters (stolen from TZ):

Biggio
Everett
Berkman
Lee
Ensberg
Scott
Burke
Ausmus
Oswalt


20513
Talk Zone / Re: Some opening day
« on: April 02, 2007, 04:26:09 pm »
And Adam Dunn was batting in the 2 hole, NTTAWWT.
I think a new Funk and Wagner entry has been born.

20514
Talk Zone / Re: Advice for first trip to MMPUS
« on: April 02, 2007, 03:37:24 pm »
if you get a chance take one of the tours of the place. you will  see its a whole different world from the dome (seats are all the same color can you imagine that)

I was in the Dome last weekend and it's still frozen in time.  No playing surface, but all the signage etc. remains, as do the rainbow seats, jumbotrons, Oilers' banners etc. etc. etc.  Bizarre.

20515
Talk Zone / Re: Advice for first trip to MMPUS
« on: April 02, 2007, 03:30:43 pm »
I am sure some would find here a bit annoying, but I and Superfan really enjoy her as does Mama Navin R, when she sits with us.

I don't think you'd find many in here who would object to genuine enthusiasm.  Actually, many decry the lack thereof.  What is annoying is the fake shit the Landry's crew, for example, try to drum up in the Crawford Boxes.  See also Oh, Day.

20516
Talk Zone / Re: Tank Commander Signage this weeked
« on: April 02, 2007, 03:27:20 pm »
"Great Taste!  Less Sleepy!"

20517
Talk Zone / Re: Haiku for the first off day of the 2007 season
« on: April 02, 2007, 03:21:27 pm »
Oswalt takes the mound
Less that two hours later
Post a "W"

20518
Talk Zone / Re: Rosters
« on: April 02, 2007, 01:22:08 pm »
I honestly don't get why Wandy is still in discussions about the Astros rotation other than "remember when..."

I "remember when" I wrote this about Wandy:

Quote
He wins when he gets run support (and doesn't give up 8 runs in 1.1 innings on a Friday night when Limey's taken his visiting family to see a game and has front row seats and ends up watching a fucked up game and has to explain why baseball isn't normally like this and why the fuck couldn't Rodriguez' herpes have flared up that night so that Sampson could've started the game at 0-0 and not down 8-0 and fuck!!!!).

I would like to have no more memories of this useless, lying (DAS) tosser.

20519
Talk Zone / Re: This Looks Strangely Familiar
« on: April 02, 2007, 12:43:39 pm »
That's a blissful reminder of reggie's tumble a couple years ago in game 2.

Reggie's pirouette was brilliantly farked, but I cannot find that link.

20521
Talk Zone / Re: Features you would like to see in the new TZ
« on: April 02, 2007, 11:40:26 am »
Would like if there was a link at the top for "Who's online".  I know it's at the bottom, but I use it alot...
While it's not a full list, the PM icon (speech bubble) under each poster's avatar has a yellow mark on it to indicate if they're online.  It's plain if they're not.

20522
On the topic of Western European bile (something of a passion of mine over the years), I give you Stella Artois (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stella_Artois).  It's "bottom-fermented" which seems entirely appropriate, and sports many glorious nicknames such as "wifebeater" and "brain damage".  I have noticed it becoming more available in the U.S. in recent times.

PS  Anyone know how to make a hyperlink in this place?

20523
Talk Zone / Re: So, like, what has been doing on with the Astros?
« on: March 23, 2007, 05:10:07 pm »
Presumably this is the result of a very thorough examination, your wife rolling around on the bed with her knees clutched to her chest, and you spitting out a caucasian when she tells you that it aids conception.

Congrats, man.

20524
Talk Zone / Re: Drum roll please... (non-BB)
« on: March 23, 2007, 05:06:54 pm »
Quote:

Texans just released Carr.  Insert Darwin joke here.



I'm so glad they did this this year and not last.  I mean, how could they have filled the QB spot last year?  Eh?  Oh.

20525
Talk Zone / Re: Cerveza Viernes (no beisbol)
« on: March 23, 2007, 04:56:54 pm »
Quote:

Shiner Kolsch.  Reminded me of a good lawnmower brew.  Pretty clean taste.



I'm still mourning the demise of Shiner 97.  Kolsch is ok, but it's no black Bavarian lager.

20526
Talk Zone / Re: Comish office asks Big to remove star...
« on: March 23, 2007, 12:57:16 pm »
Quote:

They blue prostate cancer wristbands may not be required, but they are worn during a league-sponsored event.



Here's were this issue jumps the shark.  Anyone who's anyone should realise that any rings worn about the body to increase awareness of prostate cancer...should be brown.

20527
Talk Zone / Re: Comish office asks Big to remove star...
« on: March 23, 2007, 12:50:23 pm »
Quote:

... and San Diego can wear CAMO shirts in the REGULAR SEASON to honer the military, but Biggio can't wear a tiny star on his hat in SPRING TRAINING to promote cancer awareness in Children.



I don't disagree with you, but the nit to pick here is that the entire team wore the same uniform.  Biggio's pin is worn by him only.

The way to get around this is to have the entire team wear the pin.

20528
Talk Zone / Re: RE: NYCU escalation
« on: March 23, 2007, 11:37:54 am »
Quote:

Sampson said Ausmus told him he was opening up and rushing.  Sounds like nerves.



Sounds like my swing...

20529
Talk Zone / Re: Now this is Topps
« on: March 22, 2007, 05:54:03 pm »
Quote:

Red Sox support terrorism



I fuckin' knew it!

These fuckers need torture!  Something slow and painful.  Something that makes them question their own sanity and existence.  Something cruel and totally inhuman.  Something that only the Devil himself could think up.

20530
Talk Zone / Re: How do the other teams in the division look?
« on: March 22, 2007, 05:49:58 pm »
Quote:

unfortunately, squinting or not they looked pretty damn good to me.



But they are the Cubs.  I can squint at a chick in a bar at 2:00 a.m., but that doesn't mean that she'll not turn out to be fellow CPFC fan Jo Brand.

20531
Talk Zone / Re: The Return of Alkie to the Ranks of Vanity Columnista?
« on: March 22, 2007, 05:40:37 pm »
Quote:

Without cricket? It's World Cup time, Baby!  Ain't no cricket-loving limey gonna be away from the World Cup.



It's a magical time, when fat Bermudans are making MVP plays, and English cricketing stars are being rescued from the surf at 4:00 a.m. after re-enacting "The Poseidon Adventure" with a pedalo.

20532
Talk Zone / Re: The new nickname contest begins now
« on: March 22, 2007, 01:22:22 pm »
Quote:

If .093 makes him pass out, it should be LaPussy.  Hell, I can calculate VORP and BABIP at .093.



He's an old man.  He may have simply fallen asleep irrespective of the BAL.

20533
Talk Zone / Re: The Return of Alkie to the Ranks of Vanity Columnista?
« on: March 22, 2007, 12:37:26 pm »
Quote:

Well, not just yet.  But perhaps some day soon.  The OWA is pleased to announce that we've reached a tentative agreement to allow Alkie back into the ranks of the great scribes, including Limey, of the Columnista Row.



I'm supposed to be writing a column?!!!!  Why didn't anyone tell me!!!

20534
Talk Zone / Re: The new nickname contest begins now
« on: March 22, 2007, 12:30:39 pm »
Quote:

Tanked's new uniform number?

.08




Actually, it should be .093.

20535
Talk Zone / Mug Shot! Get Yer Mug Shot 'Ere!
« on: March 22, 2007, 12:22:14 pm »
I was thinking La GeDUIs, but it's a little too contrived.  The "Tanked Commander" gets my vote, although La Guiness was a strong second.

Here's his mug shot.  Wonder how many BFiBs will use this as their avatar?

This is what The Smoking Gun had to say:

Quote:

MARCH 22--Meet Tony LaRussa. The manager of the reigning World Series champion St. Louis Cardinals, was arrested early this morning for drunk driving. LaRussa, 62, was popped in Jupiter, Florida, where the team's spring training facility is located. According to a police press release, LaRussa was found slumped over at the wheel of a Ford SUV that had stopped in a traffic intersection around midnight. After "repeated knocks at the window," LaRussa awoke. After failing some field sobriety tests, he was arrested. Breathalyzer tests later administered at the Palm Beach County Jail showed LaRussa's blood alcohol content to be .093, above Florida's .08 legal limit. After posting $500 bond, LaRussa was released at 8:20 this morning from the Palm Beach lockup, where the below booking photo was snapped.



20536
Talk Zone / Re: Speaking of Carlos Lee
« on: March 21, 2007, 12:31:11 pm »
Quote:

Raup to Zipp to Waldo. Doesn't have quite the same ring to it.



I believe it would become a widely used phrase, referring to a fleeting moment of monumental over-achievement.

20537
Talk Zone / Re: Speaking of Carlos Lee
« on: March 21, 2007, 12:13:08 pm »
Quote:

Do you suppose Leverock knew how many wickets had been taken?



He knew, it was the first pitch of just the second "over" (group of 6 pitches) in a 50 over match.  It's just that Bermuda vs. India is a mis-match of gargantuan proportions - think OWA Softball team vs. the Astros.  Imagine if some weird circumstance allowed that game to happen, and in the top of the 1st the Astros have the bases loaded, and Foggy induces the necessary grounder, which the infield turns into a 6-4-3 DP without anyone fucking up.  Would we care that there was still 8 innings to play?

20538
Talk Zone / Speaking of Carlos Lee
« on: March 20, 2007, 10:04:29 pm »
He has a doppleganger, who plays cricket for Bermuda.

20539
Talk Zone / Re: If you like feeling rage...
« on: March 20, 2007, 09:56:51 pm »
Quote:

You've got an opinion, which beats facts with a stick.  It's all anyone needs today.  Any opinion is equal to any other.



"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts."
  -- Daniel Patrick Moynihan

20540
Talk Zone / Re: Rockies release Javy Lopez
« on: March 13, 2007, 05:58:10 pm »
Typically I am wary of the acquisition of players who kill the Astros but aren't as good against the rest of the league (see Weathers, David and that ridiculous fuck with the shark teeth and rosin bag slam whose name I forget [eta: Turk freakin' Wendell]).  But as a back-up catcher and stick off the bench, this wouldn't be too bad.

20541
Talk Zone / Re: See! Hunter Pence! Live!
« on: March 13, 2007, 05:54:19 pm »
Quote:

...which would make EXACTLY as much sense as having El Paso in the territory.  I was closer to something like 29 other teams, and yet the Astros were blacked out.



I believe El Paso is further from Houston than NH.

20542
Talk Zone / Re: See! Hunter Pence! Live!
« on: March 13, 2007, 05:49:06 pm »
Quote:

Do we get Fox Sports New Hampshire inside 610?



No.  The Astros claim New Hampshire as part of its catchment area and so it's blacked out per MLB rools.

20543
Talk Zone / Re: Words fail me
« on: March 13, 2007, 11:45:23 am »
Quote:

Quote:

It's amazing that you bring this up.  Because as I was watching Blood Diamond over the weekend, all I kept thinking about was what happened to Jennifer's boobs.  Of course, she's still smoking hot.



She's come a long way from topless by the lake in "The Hot Spot" and riding the department store mechanical pony in "Career Opportunities".  Those were nice.

[insert Limey YouTube clips here]




I'm sure that "riding the mechanical pony" is a euphemism for something.  If it isn't, it should be.

20544
Talk Zone / Re: Words fail me
« on: March 13, 2007, 11:42:13 am »
Quote:

Is it possible to have a thread simply devoted to making fun of Richard Justice without bringing up the abominations of breast reduction?  Can we focus?



Any mention of Richard Justice will make me think of a huge boob.  Either that, or an enormous penis.

20545
Talk Zone / Re: Words fail me
« on: March 12, 2007, 04:07:44 pm »
Quote:

There was definitely nakedness in the version I saw. The camera didn't linger too long though, probably because they didn't want anyone to notice the scars from her boob reduction.

Of course I saw them anyway.




Boob reductions are an affront to God.  See Connelly, Jennifer,  before and  after.

20546
Talk Zone / Re: Words fail me
« on: March 12, 2007, 02:33:23 pm »
Quote:

I.  Must.  See.   This.  Movie.



No nudity and Justin Timberlake.  It's all yours.

20547
Talk Zone / Re: Friday Beer (non-bb)
« on: March 10, 2007, 09:42:56 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Isnt lard pork fat?





Rendered pork fat.  I don't exactly know what rendering involves, and I am pretty sure I don't want to find out.

In the supermarket, down the "ethnic" aisle, I see huge 10 lb. buckets labeled Manteca de Cerdo, or something like that.  I have mixed feelings.  The butter of pig.  I am guessing that's what goes in the refried beans, when they're getting "refried."




Suet is the Limeyland equivalent, being rendered beef fat.  In a similar (clogged) vein, the juices from a beef roast are often saved and refrigerated.  The fat separates out, floats to the top and is used for cooking.  The rest of the meat juices, called "dripping", congeal at the bottom, and are used as a sandwich spread.

This practice gave rise to the highly successful pick-up line:  "Do you like beef?  Well suck this, it's dripping!"  And, of course, it's sister line:  "Do you like chicken?  Well suck this, it's fowl!"

20548
Talk Zone / Re: Friday Beer (non-bb)
« on: March 09, 2007, 06:25:09 pm »
Quote:

I wonder if there is any predictive significance to the name of the brewery ... "Schmaltz" means "Lard"



Mmmmmmm....lard.

20549
Talk Zone / Re: Tipping? NBB
« on: March 09, 2007, 12:11:38 pm »
Quote:

The "tip" would be the "dump" in American.  Presumably "fly-tipping" would best be translated as "drive-by dumping" (or simply "unauthorized dumping" for those with less imagination).



Bingo.

20550
Talk Zone / Re: Tipping? NBB
« on: March 09, 2007, 12:10:37 pm »
Quote:

I've heard of 'pitch-tipping' and even cow-tipping, but can someone (Limey) please explain this?

 Fly-tipping




Given that you typically have to pay to dump your shit at the...urm...dump, people engage in this practice, whereby they deposit their shit in such a way as it becomes someone else's shit to deal with.

The classic example of fly-tipping is when you order a dumpster because you're going to clean out your garage.  The problem is that as soon as your back is turned it's overloaded with other people's shit.  The refuse company won't take an overloaded dumpster, so you have to order two more dumpsters: one to reduce the first one to an even load, and the other for all your shit that you still have.  And you better keep watch at night with a shotgun, or you'll be ordering yet more dumpsters come sun up.

20551
Talk Zone / Re: Is Gunther a "phenom"?
« on: March 09, 2007, 11:26:50 am »
I'm reserving judgement on the hitters until later in the spring, when the pitchers are starting to dial it up.  Until now, I think the good pitchers who aren't fighting for a place (you know, the ones who can get Lane out with their eyes closed, i.e. half the league) are just throwing slop to get their arm strength up.

When they start snapping off sliders and pulling strings on changeups, that's when we'll get a glimpse of what these "phenoms" are made.  Everyone should be able to hit a fastball...

20552
Talk Zone / Re: Fuck it all....a declaration of war for 2008
« on: March 09, 2007, 11:22:47 am »
Quote:

I look forward to sporting a campaign bumper sticker:  "Foggy & Craig or go fuck yourself!"




I think we need stickers that say "Fuck you, I'm votin' for Foggy and Craig!"



No reason not to have both.  I thought mine sounded more Presidential...or, more accurately, Vice Presidential.

20553
Talk Zone / Re: Wha?! When did this happen?
« on: March 09, 2007, 11:18:21 am »
Quote:

China, TX is only about 80 miles away from the Galleria Area...it's not that impressive.

Is there a Germany, Texas near Lake Jackson?




You could always ride to Paris.  Which is amazingly both closer, and farther away, than China.

20554
Talk Zone / Re: Fuck it all....a declaration of war for 2008
« on: March 08, 2007, 05:36:55 pm »
Quote:

So... you wouldn't hit that?



I'd be Ensberg on a 3-0 count.

20555
Talk Zone / Re: Fuck it all....a declaration of war for 2008
« on: March 08, 2007, 04:30:56 pm »
Quote:

I am sure there are a couple of others I've forgot.



There is this one.  Of course, that was then, this is now.

20556
Talk Zone / Re: Fuck it all....a declaration of war for 2008
« on: March 08, 2007, 02:50:37 pm »
Quote:

I thought we were going to see the Foggy/Craig ticket for President.



I look forward to sporting a campaign bumper sticker:  "Foggy & Craig or go fuck yourself!"

20557
Talk Zone / Re: How Oswalt Nearly Became a Met
« on: March 06, 2007, 11:53:51 am »
Quote:

By that math, Oswalt isn't worth a shit, and makes the entire trade scenario illogical.



...which is why it exists only in the vast open spaces inside the heads of certain sports journos, where it can roam and romp and grow and change for all eternity, without every going to the same place twice.

ETA:  [missing clip of Homer Simpson dancing in Chocolate World]

20558
Talk Zone / Once More, We Play Our Dangerous Game
« on: March 05, 2007, 01:13:57 pm »
[missing "Red October" clip]
Astros - Jakes today.  It's spring training, but I hope someone plunks Pooholes, because he's deserved it for years.  And Edmonds.

20559
Talk Zone / Re: That's all I can stand
« on: March 05, 2007, 01:09:54 pm »
Quote:

I like the randomly capitalized "R" replacing the randomly capitalized "A".



How do you know that the O's, W, P and S's aren't capitalised too?

20560
Talk Zone / Re: Astros lack instructors
« on: March 02, 2007, 05:23:58 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

and  Simmons, Gene.




thank you! at least someone is getting the appropriate youtube links.




Thanks.  I have a paper cut for you to squeeze lemon juice into too.

20561
Talk Zone / Re: Astros lack instructors
« on: March 02, 2007, 01:31:18 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

"If you give it an extra second to make sure where it is and go get it, it will give you an extra jump and you won't look like you're running around with your hair on fire. Those were his exact words."




See: Berkman, Lance




...and Prior, Richard.  Also Jackson, Michael.

20562
Talk Zone / Re: Reporting injuries
« on: March 02, 2007, 01:29:30 pm »
Quote:

Dammit, I was hoping this thread was going to be about Richard Justice being knocked unconscious by an errant Brad Lidge 100 MPH fastball.



[missing clip from "Phantasm"]

20563
Talk Zone / Re: lasorda likes watching girl-girl porn while....
« on: March 02, 2007, 12:32:20 pm »
Lasorda getting a hummer...buh-bye breakfast.

20564
Talk Zone / Re: I just have to say...
« on: March 02, 2007, 12:01:38 pm »
Quote:

It's part of the grieving process.

Denial -> Anger -> Bargaining -> Guilt -> Sadness/Melancholy -> Acceptance

Limey looks to me that he's at Melancholy about his long lost love.  All we can do is offer our best wishes to him!




[missing clip of cockpit scene from Airplane]

20565
Talk Zone / Re: I just have to say...
« on: March 02, 2007, 12:00:39 pm »
Quote:

I'm getting a kick out of Limey's posts citing the missing YouTube clips that he would have linked to if only his miserly employer didn't have some twisted devotion to productivity.



Thanks

[missing clip of Bluto's speech from Animal House]

20566
Talk Zone / Re: Drayton gets involved in DirecTV-baseball situation
« on: March 01, 2007, 06:57:16 pm »
Quote:

For one thing, it would throw the organization into several years of confusion.



I'm sure that the word "more" is missing from that sentence somewhere.

20567
Talk Zone / Re: Drayton gets involved in DirecTV-baseball situation
« on: March 01, 2007, 05:36:05 pm »
Quote:

Also, wouldn't be able to restrict where a team could locate. Like the DC situation, or a possible San Antonio team.



...so it protects the rich clubs from competition with smaller clubs who might move into their market.  So even in a tiny population of 30 gazillionaires, the top 5% still shit all over the other 95%.  Classic.

20568
Talk Zone / Re: Drayton gets involved in DirecTV-baseball situation
« on: March 01, 2007, 05:23:36 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

"... Baseball is being held to a different standard."





Sucks when it doesn't work in your favor.




I've often been curious as to what would happen if these bozos' flapping lips finally torpedo the exemption.  Other than the potential for a rival league (XLB?) I have no idea what other ills may befall them.

20569
Game Zone 2007 Archive / Re: Top 6, 7-1 Tribe. 2 down, Munson up.
« on: March 01, 2007, 03:48:55 pm »
Quote:

Foul ball down the 1B line.
Maybe a strike, maybe a ball... Not sure.
Another pitch missed, I heard the pop, but no mention.
Ball in the dirt. No clue what the count is.
Ball again. No mention of the count.
I think Munson walked.




So, it seems that it takes Milo just 6 innings to get into mid-season form.

20570
Game Zone 2007 Archive / Re: Heading to the top of the 2nd 0-0
« on: March 01, 2007, 02:40:35 pm »
Quote:

Does anyone else sort of feel like Milo is giving a little more detail than usual?  Maybe it's just been a while since I heard him.



He can stay (mostly) awake for these early starts [missing Grandpa Simpson clip here].

20571
Game Zone 2007 Archive / Re: Welcome to Grapefruit League 2007
« on: March 01, 2007, 02:14:09 pm »
The clock is running for the first "Milo Sucks" rant.

20572
Talk Zone / Re: $$ Cha-Ching $$ (non-astros, but bb related..sorta)
« on: March 01, 2007, 01:28:16 pm »
Quote:

Did you miss the part where he is a southpaw?



Clearly...yes.

20573
Talk Zone / Re: Luke Scott loves Jesus
« on: March 01, 2007, 01:08:52 pm »
Quote:

I agree with that, but where people publically invoking their religion really bothers me is when politicians do it. Political figures in this country should operate in a religious vaccuum, but instead they have to publically make a demonstration of their faith in order to be taken seriously. That always sticks in my craw.



I think that espousing one's religious beliefs in politics is a form of disclosure to the voters, and that's a good thing.  Using it to claim a moral high ground over an opponent, is the same type of arrogance discussed above.

Using your own personal religious beliefs to, for example, veto legislation that could lead to cures for many terrible diseases and which is supported by the majority of the population, the majority of the House and the majority of the Senate, is religious dictatorship.

I've now started my stopwatch...

20574
Talk Zone / Re: Luke Scott loves Jesus
« on: March 01, 2007, 12:54:47 pm »
Quote:

Like I said- and maybe didn't convey accurately enough, I have no problem with Luke's interview. I share his faith.  I have no problem with him talking about it.

I even said he did it in the right way, talking about how it helps systematically with his values and the like. This is, imho, the proper role of speaking about faith in a daily venture. I try to put my faith in God and his promises to take care of me every day into my life at work.

I agree completely with limey- I hate it when players talk about how god wanted them to win.  I've never thought- Oh- I got this particular deal over a competitor b/c God likes me more than them, and I deserve it. It irks me a bit when ballplayers do this.  Luke wasn't doing that and seems to have his faith in a proper perspective.  He just talks about it alot- at every interview opportunity seemingly. I have no problem with that, as long as he doesn't go out and say that God made him hit that HR b/c the inference is he loves Luke Scott more then the pitcher.

Berkman had a great thought on this when he was in studio on 610 this winter.  He talked about how he was all ready to credit God for the HR and getting the stros to the WS, until Pujols bomb ended the game.  Pujols then gave all the credit to God (presumable God likes him more than lidge?)  

Anyway, Berkman said that it reinforced to him that God is bigger than Lance, and doesn't need Lance to further his agenda.  It sounded like Lance had a good head on his shoulder about things, and it sounded like Lance learned something from it.

That is all.




Exactly.  Anyone can talk about whatever they want (I tend to ramble on about beer and soccer a lot, which I'm sure irritates many).  But there needs to be some perspective, such as Luke and Lance display, instead of the illogical blathering that people get away with because it's about God.

Even giving thanks for a homer or scoring a run doesn't bother me, as giving thanks is a common component of many religions, such as saying grace and giving thanks for being able to put food on your family.  Although I admit that I think pointing to the heavens after reaching 1B on an infield bleeder is a little silly...

20575
Talk Zone / Re: Ausmus and his crystal ball
« on: March 01, 2007, 12:45:43 pm »
Quote:

From Whitey's PPV-blog at ESPN...

Ausmus thinks Lidge will be successful again in '07, in large part due to the sinking fastball he used heavily at the end of last season.  The fastball, which bores down and in to right-handers is a great compliment to his slider.

Ausmus also thinks Sampson will win the #5 spot in the rotation.




If Lidge can truly control a looks-like-a-fastball-but-is-down-and-in sinker, to go with his looks-like-a-fastball-but-is-down-and-away slider, he'll be about as hittable as Steve Nebraska.

20576
Talk Zone / Re: $$ Cha-Ching $$ (non-astros, but bb related..sorta)
« on: March 01, 2007, 12:38:04 pm »
Quote:

THIS is one hell of a good land investment.



I think that, at age 29 and still trying to catch on with the Dodgers, he might want to take the quarry thing a bit more seriously...

20577
Talk Zone / Re: The Worst Thing Imaginable
« on: March 01, 2007, 12:35:51 pm »
Quote:

I mean, I wouldn't mind a blow job from Shania Twain but that ain't gonna happen either.



That's just beautiful, man.

20578
Talk Zone / Re: Luke Scott loves Jesus
« on: March 01, 2007, 12:34:10 pm »
Quote:

Who cares if he mentions God in his interviews?  If he is a religious man, good for him.. if not, ok then.



It's not about anyone's faith, or even talking about it in public (or private).  It's about certain people of faith who claim that they believe that God was "on their side".  This presumes that those on the other side are not pious enough to be worthy God's help, which is the height of arrogance, IMHO.  And last time I looked, arrogance (or a synonym thereof) is one of the deadly sins...

20579
Talk Zone / Re: Luke Scott loves Jesus
« on: March 01, 2007, 12:26:21 pm »
Quote:

Just once I'd like to see a ballplayer come out and say, "I just want to thank my lord and savior Satan." That would be pretty funny. People would flip. Could he backtrack out of it and say he was just kidding to get a rise, or would he be doomed?



He'd be doomed; just marginally faster than if he thanked Allah.

20580
Talk Zone / Re: Stems' Oliver Perez plunks SI photographer
« on: March 01, 2007, 12:23:48 pm »
Quote:

Perez walked only one batter in two innings, but gave up four runs and five hits as the New York Mets lost 5-4 to the Detroit Tigers in their spring training opener Wednesday.  "I got hit pretty good..."



Ironically, that quote came from the photographer, not Perez.

20581
Talk Zone / Re: You've been called out by JdJO
« on: February 28, 2007, 06:05:46 pm »
Quote:

I doubt it and I wouldn't lose sleep over it.  In your case, the quality of your takes is reflected well by the avatar you use.



I think you're being way too specific.  This whole place is a Police Academy movie.  Probably #15.

20582
Talk Zone / Re: You've been called out by JdJO
« on: February 28, 2007, 03:18:13 pm »
Quote:

Interesting class assignment: Go 'redesign' someone else's shit without their permission.



Why actually do your homework when you can just steal it?

Also, this is most likely a computer nerd we're talking about, so he didn't have the option of bullying a nerd to do it for him.

20583
Talk Zone / Re: Anybody read this?
« on: February 27, 2007, 08:04:49 pm »
Quote:

That's something I've heard Garner mention several times, with respect to both the pitching staff and the hitters. He always harps on the importance of a 1-1 pitch as the make-or-break pitch of an at-bat and the statistics backing that up.



Not impugning Scraps, but that's a pretty obvious statement.  2-1 is clearly a more favourable count than 1-2.  Of course, knowing that and doing anything about it depends partly on the ability of the hitter and quite heavily on what pitch the pitcher throws on 1-1 and whether you have, for example, Willy T or Jose Canseco in CF.

Also, taking things to an absurd extreme, the most favourable count on which to hit a home run off Shane Reynolds, was 0-2.  Fact!

20584
Talk Zone / Re: Intrasquad game highlights
« on: February 27, 2007, 07:58:03 pm »
Quote:

The Astros held an intrasquad scrimmage on Tuesday. Garner was most impressed by closer Brad Lidge, who threw 13 pitches and struck out two batters. "Lidge was perfect," Garner said. "If he maintains his mechanics like he did today, he'll be in perfect shape." ... OF Hunter Pence homered off RHP Ezequiel Astacio. Pence hit .283 with 28 homers and 95 RBIs at Double-A Corpus Christi last season. ... SS Adam Everett went 3-for-4 with two doubles.
The Link




I see that they're spinning Brad Lidge's poor performances already.  If he'd been "perfect", he would've thrown only 9 pitches (missing "The Scout" clip).  Either that, or Lidge faced 4 1/3rd hitters.

20585
Talk Zone / Re: You've been called out by JdJO
« on: February 27, 2007, 07:54:48 pm »
Quote:

Okay, but we need to stall to find out the rules first.  And then figure out a way to cheat if we have to.  Where is Limey?



Why do you automatically think of the Englishman when it comes to cheating?

Statment from Limey's agent:
Limey apologises for the lack of an appropriate YouTube clip (of flopping soccer players).  Limey's employer has made the extremely sane move of putting YouTube in the verboten zone.  However, if Limey's employer thinks that this will mean that he will do any actual work (missing "Office Space" clip), they're soooorely mistaken (missing "Ferris Bueller" clip).

20586
Talk Zone / Re: You've been called out by JdJO
« on: February 27, 2007, 07:45:29 pm »
Quote:

Yes I can, predictions are for idiots. (ETA) Also, his idea of pitting AstrosDaily vs Orangewhoopass in a "friendly" competition, somebody needs to gently and privately explain to him why that is a very bad idea.  



I seem to recall a short-lived suggestion to have an OWA vs. AD softball game, but they weren't interested.  I believe their mantra is "Don't fuck with the OWAldies".

20587
Talk Zone / Re: Anybody read this?
« on: February 27, 2007, 06:30:50 pm »
Quote:

Last season they said out loud that they were very interested in how hitters work a count.  I'd suspect that is tracked as well as every other stat that any 10 year old kid can find on the Internet.



Ensberg, in particular, was very adept at working a count to 3-3.

20588
Talk Zone / Re: Major Bust May Expose More MLBers in Steroid Scandal
« on: February 27, 2007, 03:01:05 pm »
Quote:

Does anyone know if recent contracts include "use of illegal performance enhancing drugs" such as HGH or steriods as grounds for breach of contract?



Are you kidding?  MLB poo-pooed Bonds' new contract because it stated that the Jints weren't going to pay him if couldn't play because he was in jail!

20589
Talk Zone / Re: Anybody read this?
« on: February 27, 2007, 02:42:11 pm »
Quote:

First I've heard of it. I think it only refers to the 04 run.  I'd be interested to see what moves the author suggested.  I think, 1st trade for Carlos Beltran, 2nd play him shorter in center, 3, hit him second, worked really well.



Nah.  First was "get Berkman match-fit"...

20590
Talk Zone / Major Bust May Expose More MLBers in Steroid Scandal
« on: February 27, 2007, 01:19:27 pm »
A bust in Florida has netted a bunch of doctors who were proscribing steroids and HGH to pro-athletes.  Gary Matthews Jr. is named specifically, but it is expected that many more players will be exposed.

No word yet as to how Gary Sheffield is going to spin this into him being victimised by the media/MLB/police etc.

20591
Talk Zone / Re: Luke Scott loves Jesus
« on: February 27, 2007, 12:48:34 pm »
Quote:

We're covering old ground here.  Jesus got rung up by Pilate.  After three days, he was gone from the dugout.



Are you saying that Jesus is like Bobby Valentine?

20592
Talk Zone / Re: Luke Scott loves Jesus
« on: February 27, 2007, 12:46:49 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

or a cool guy who may be the Son of God but who didn't meet the all tests for Messianic status.
 





Within Judaism, there are a bunch of different views about Jesus.  There are people who say that Jesus never existed historically.  There are others who say that Jesus was basically an early "reformed rabbi" in the sense that he sought to change existing religous practices, including the laws of keeping kosher -- not that he ever claimed to be the messiah.  Then there are others who say that he claimed to be the messiah but did not meet the tests in Judaism for messianic status.  I don't believe that you are going to find a lot of practicing Jews who would take the view that Jesus was the "son of god" except in the most broad sense that we are all children of god.




Cool.  Thanks for the correction.  I'm Church of England which is really a faith-optional kind of religion.

20593
Talk Zone / Re: Luke Scott loves Jesus
« on: February 26, 2007, 06:59:33 pm »
Quote:

Then there are guys like Zola Levitt.  I think he calls himself a messianic Jew.  What's a Christian to think?



If you really want to blow your mind, consider that God in Islam is the same God in Christianity which is, of course, the same God in Judaism.  The differences are whether Jesus Christ was the Son of God, a prophet of God (but not as important as Mohamed) or a cool guy who may be the Son of God but who didn't meet the all tests for Messianic status.

Next week, there'll be a theological study of the infield fly rule.

20594
Talk Zone / Re: Lil Woodrows on W. Alabama
« on: February 26, 2007, 06:30:15 pm »
Quote:

I know a few people here frequent Woodorows, I heard a rumor that the lot it is sitting on has been sold and Lil Woodorws is going to be torn down.   Anyone else hear this?



Dunno 'bout that, but a very similar thing happened to The Stables on Westheimer.  It'd been there for years, but when the long lease finally expired, the owner decided not to re-up.  The Stables had no choice but to walk away from their premises.

20595
Talk Zone / Re: Luke Scott loves Jesus
« on: February 26, 2007, 06:27:29 pm »
Quote:

Is it just me or does this seem like the longest offseason ever?



It's longer than usual for Astros' fans because there was no post season.  It's always this long for the Pyroots etc.

20596
Talk Zone / Re: Luke Scott loves Jesus
« on: February 26, 2007, 05:42:00 pm »
I don't have a problem with someone having faith and extolling that faith.  My problem is when God is credited for helping with a win, or a hit/putt/touchdown/goal etc. etc.  The intention behind that kind of statement is almost certainly innocent, but the inference is that the victorious won because they were more worthy in God's eyes than their opponent.  This is the height of arrogance, IMHO, and belittles both the sporting competition and God him/her/their self.

Bottom line:

God helped me get through the tough times and training and traveling and hard slog of the season...Ding!

God was on our side tonight...Bzzzzzzzzt!

20597
Talk Zone / Re: Caption this
« on: February 26, 2007, 05:29:20 pm »
You weren't kidding when you told me the dressing room facilities are a little basic...

20598
Talk Zone / Marlins To Cut Everyone To Pay For Miguel Cabrera?s Salary
« on: February 26, 2007, 12:32:52 pm »
From The Brushback:

MIAMI--Florida Marlins third baseman Miguel Cabrera won his arbitration hearing last week and was awarded a salary of $7.4 million, up from last year?s salary of $472,000. The Marlins, owners of the lowest payroll in baseball last year, plan to pay for the whopping increase by cutting everyone else on the team.

?We?re going to have to trim payroll pretty significantly here,? said GM Larry Beinfest. ?We?re already way over our desired payroll of $10 million, so, we?re sorry to report that every player on the team is being cut. Yea, that means Dontrelle, Dan Uggla, Hanley Ramirez, what?s-his-face in left field and that other guy with the chick?s name...Anibal. Anyway, they?re all gonzo, but I hope that doesn?t deter our fans from buying season tickets. Remember, a lot of people wrote us off before last season and we almost made the playoffs.?

20599
Talk Zone / Re: Photo caption anyone?
« on: February 23, 2007, 09:03:08 am »
Brad Lidge shows Manager Phil Garner his major league curve.

or

"Can you hear me now?"

20600
Talk Zone / Re: Possibly they haven't been properly introduced
« on: February 22, 2007, 04:50:41 pm »
Quote:

Reminds me of high school football.  One year several track guys were persuaded by the football coaches to come over to football.  Most of the distance guys looked kind of emaciated to us, and I think they all got put at WR.  But we had one guy, a sprinter, who was built like a truck.  Not a Mack truck, ok.  Maybe an S-10 or something.  But he was solid, and this cat could fly.  He had run a sub-10 second 100 yd. dash in a meet that spring (this was pre-metric days), which was very, very fast for a high schooler at the time.  He had decent football instincts, too.  We figured we'd found us one.

Three seperate times in our first two games, this guy negotiated his way through the line of scrimmage and secondary and broke absolutely free, running all alone down the field for the end zone.  But each time at some point, with no one within 15 yards of him, the ball would just fly out.  Fumble.  This drove the coaches to distraction, of course; and then this guy's excuse each time was that he was just running along and he forgot he had the ball in his hands.  Which drove the coaches insane.

Apparently, while he was plowing through the line and dodging guys in the secondary, this guy could remember he was playing football.  But once he broke free and was running all alone, he'd forget, revert back to his sprinter's form, and drop his arms and start pumping.




That's not as embarrassing as what happened to Will Carling.  The former England captain and (alleged) former lover of Princess Diana was torpedoed by his own hubris.  Just remember that, in Rugby, the player has to touch the ball to the ground in the "end zone" to record a score.

20601
Talk Zone / Re: Possibly they haven't been properly introduced
« on: February 22, 2007, 12:58:59 pm »
Quote:

James Bovard wrote a book on American's short attention span entitled  Attention Deficit Democracy which I can't recommend highly enough.  Rather depressing though when I think about it...



Think about what?

20602
Talk Zone / Re: Possibly they haven't been properly introduced
« on: February 21, 2007, 06:32:24 pm »
Quote:

Don't count on Bagwell, the Dome he plays in will keep those fantasy numbers down.



...and the diving involved at 3B, onto that hard carpet, will take it's toll on him.

20603
Talk Zone / Re: Wrong, Wrong, Wrong, Wrong, Wrong, Wrong, Wrong, Wrong,
« on: February 21, 2007, 03:09:06 pm »
Quote:

email him



cc his boss.

20604
Talk Zone / Cubs Avoid Arb. with Zambrano
« on: February 21, 2007, 03:08:22 pm »
$12.4 meeelion, one year for Big Carlos.

The link

20605
Talk Zone / Re: Same look less smell
« on: February 21, 2007, 02:27:21 pm »
Quote:

when i played at UT in the dark ages, the entire freaking uniform was wool. on a hot day, they weighed about 100 pounds.



A Jim R era bobble-head doll.

20606
Talk Zone / Re: Holdzkom
« on: February 20, 2007, 02:55:04 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

so, do we call him the Rail Splitter?




That works.  Or, maybe the Great Emancipator.




Why not simply "Texas".

20607
Talk Zone / Re: Friday Beer (non-bb)
« on: February 19, 2007, 03:34:02 pm »
Quote:

I've been blasted frequently by beer snobs - I use the term endearingly - for liking Newcastle. There's something about it that appeals to me.



Newcastle Brown should be used only for hand-to-hand combat.

20608
Talk Zone / Re: You stay classy, Houston
« on: February 19, 2007, 12:46:13 pm »
Quote:

Because of things like that, Everett - in his Astros days anyway - is one of my favorite players ever.



I liked him here too - not least for his single-handed demolition of the Cubbies one weekend in Chicago.

However, he also had the single worst at-bat I've ever seen by anyone ever (well, prior to Moberg's 2nd half in 2005).  I think you might remember C4's at-bat...extra innings...playoff game...bases loaded...no one out...

20609
Talk Zone / Re: You stay classy, Houston
« on: February 19, 2007, 11:35:52 am »
Quote:

are you kidding? Everett was well known as combustible when he came to Houston. it is the only place where he behaved.



I'm not sure that "behaved" is the correct description as there were reports, after he (and Dierker) left, that he would pitch a fit if not starting, including throwing chairs around on at least one occasion.  The difference here was that the players kept it to themselves and the media was either shut out of the story (as so few have any decent access anyway) or cooperative in keeping it under wraps.

No question that he was better behaved in Houston, though.

20610
Talk Zone / Re: Friday Beer (non-bb)
« on: February 19, 2007, 11:31:24 am »
Quote:

The shipping is part of it, but most European brewers brew different beers for export than they do for indiginous consumption.  Hacker-Pshorr is one of the rare exceptions, which is why it's my favorite beer in the world.  At any rate, as for the Heineken being brewed under license outside The Netherlands, I dont' think that's true, though they could certainly brew an "Americanized" version for export.



Don't forget that they eff with the alcohol content which has to change the taste.  Just like taking the caffeine out of coffee.  Case in point is Bud, which is almost palatable in Canada where the ABV is 6.5% (IIRC).

20611
Talk Zone / Re: Friday Beer (non-bb)
« on: February 19, 2007, 11:24:46 am »
Quote:

I've been drinking a lot of Irish beers lately (Guiness, Kilkenny, and Harp).



Put down the Harp and back away.

20612
Talk Zone / Re: McGwire Gets Into HoF
« on: February 15, 2007, 12:56:10 pm »
Quote:

History professor Neil Waters says Wikipedia is an ideal place to start research but an unacceptable way to end it.



BINGO!

20613
Talk Zone / Re: Anna Nicole Smith DEAD
« on: February 12, 2007, 09:45:48 pm »
Quote:

OK, now I'm frightened.



Just be glad I couldn't find the audio clip of Bill O. reading his "Say baby..." line of dialogue.  It's both hilarious and disturbing (even if you're not his intern).

20614
Talk Zone / Re: Anna Nicole Smith DEAD
« on: February 12, 2007, 08:14:50 pm »
More conservative novel writing:

Robo used his ?product? only occasionally, but tonight was special. He had two fifteen-year-old girls who would do anything for the drug, and he was determined to exploit the situation.

?Say, baby, put that pipe down and get my pipe up,? Robo said to one of the girls. She was so intoxicated she had trouble standing, but Robo was her sugar daddy, and as he sat in a filthy, imitation, leather couch, there in the living room of a run-down three-bedroom apartment, she obediently performed oral sex on him.

Five feet away, the other teenage girl sat on a mattress on the floor and watched, greedily sucking on the crack pipe Robo had passed to her. Edgar looked over and grinned, showing yellow, decaying teeth. Obviously, he preferred oral sex to oral hygiene.

?You?re next, girl, and I want you to do her too,? he ordered. As Robo took the crack pipe back the girl groggily nodded her consent. Inhaling deeply, Robo blew the cocaine smoke out through his nose and mouth. The bitter taste left him feeling powerful, energized, and free of worry. He was bad and he was flush.

- from the novel "Those Who Tresspass", by Bill O'Reilly (available in audio book, read by Bill O. himself).


At age ten the madam put the child in a cage with a bear trained to couple with young girls so the girls would be frigid and not fall in love with their patrons. They fed her through the bars and aroused the bear with a stick when it seemed to lose interest.

- from the novel "The Apprentice", by I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby


The women who embraced in the wagon were Adam and Eve crossing a dark cathedral stage -- no, Eve and Eve, loving one another as they would not be able to once they ate of the fruit and knew themselves as they truly were. She felt curiously moved, curiously envious of them. She had never to this moment thought Eden a particularly attractive paradise, based as it was on naivet?, but she saw that the women in the cart had a passionate, loving intimacy forever closed to her. How strong it made them. What comfort it gave.

- from the novel "Sisters", by Lynne Cheney (the mother, not the daughter).

20615
Talk Zone / Re: McGwire Gets Into HoF
« on: February 12, 2007, 07:50:40 pm »
Quote:

but the fact that it is self correcting, shows its strength.  the fact that it's self correcting (with malicious intent or with just pure ignorance), shows its weakness.



It's the same thing with any type of freedom:  one cannot protect one's liberties by giving them up.

20616
Talk Zone / Re: Anna Nicole Smith DEAD
« on: February 10, 2007, 03:10:37 am »
Quote:

Doesn't even have to rub her legs together, or anything.



...the missing element in the movie of the book "Jaws".

20617
Talk Zone / Re: Anna Nicole Smith DEAD
« on: February 10, 2007, 03:09:02 am »
There's only one ELVIS!

20618
Talk Zone / Bugger
« on: February 10, 2007, 01:51:15 am »
Realise that I was waaaay to adventurous in offering to bag it this year.  I'm out of the country for the next few day and then out of State.

I suck, but at least I apologise.

20619
Talk Zone / Re: New Astros.com banner
« on: February 08, 2007, 06:45:40 pm »
Quote:

Makes you wonder where the good guys were last season.



Grilling HEB steaks in their backyards until July?

20620
Talk Zone / Re: Help with pre-sale!
« on: February 08, 2007, 06:26:39 pm »
Quote:

Thanks!  Astros v Cardinals, April 7th.  Wahoo!!



Fuck the Jakes.

20621
Talk Zone / Re: Anna Nicole Smith DEAD
« on: February 08, 2007, 06:21:10 pm »
Quote:

Nope, Kim Kardashian is the "celebrity" videoslut of the week.



I think I've seen Lindsey Lohan's gash more often that her OB-GYN.

20622
Talk Zone / Re: Anna Nicole Smith DEAD
« on: February 08, 2007, 06:11:56 pm »
Quote:

Well, maybe this will take some heat off NASA.



...because that's the only newsworthy thing happening this week.  It's not like there's a member of the White House staff on trial for perjury, or a serving officer on trial for refusing deployment to Iraq (he offered to go to Afghanistan) or anything important like that.

Also, no Paris Hilton sex tape this week.

20623
Talk Zone / Re: Anna Nicole Smith DEAD
« on: February 08, 2007, 06:09:43 pm »
Quote:

"Choosing" to live only 5 years beyond a superstar career is moronic.



That's the choice that I remember the survey exposed.  Of course, I was fucked up on Shiner at the time...

20624
Talk Zone / Re: Anna Nicole Smith DEAD
« on: February 08, 2007, 05:36:02 pm »
Quote:

That, kids, must be some serious shit.



For a short time, it made her fuckable again (can I say "fuckable" on the air?).

There was a survey amongst baseball players (probably minor leagues because big-leaguers wouldn't answer the question for free):
Q:  If you could take a substance that would make you a superstar player, but would kill you 5 years after your career was over, would you take it?
A:  Over 50% said "Yes".

Of course, they probably weren't dealing with a walking cadaver of a body.

20625
Talk Zone / Re: Senator Kerry gets involved in DirecTV-baseball situatio
« on: February 08, 2007, 05:30:04 pm »
...except that Kerry called the service the "Line-of-sight-earth-to-space-to-earth-premium-televisual-and-audio-broadcast-service"

20626
Talk Zone / Re: Moises a Met
« on: February 08, 2007, 05:21:30 pm »
Quote:

I hope he shakes hands with everyone in NYC.



Probably the only thing that would get him to wash his own hands.

20627
Talk Zone / Re: OWA Opening Day
« on: February 08, 2007, 05:18:16 pm »
Quote:

I'm sure everyone is excited about Opening Day as I am, and I hope that we can have another OWA Opening Day Eggstravaganza.  However, unforunately, I will not be able to be the bag man for tickets as I have in the past.  If anyone is wanting to jump in and save the day, please speak up.  You can pm me if you need some details of what I've done the last few years.



When do tix go on sale?  I can be the bag-man this year (even have a PayPal account now, if that's the preferred option).  However, I'm out of pocket for the next couple of weeks, so I won't be able to book anything until late Feb.

20628
Talk Zone / Re: Anna Nicole Smith DEAD
« on: February 08, 2007, 05:11:28 pm »
Quote:

that's all, just wanted to report it.



That's Trim-Spa, baby!

20629
Talk Zone / Re: Superbowl Menus????
« on: February 04, 2007, 06:29:45 pm »
At my suggestion, Mrs Limey has made chocolate muffins decorated to look like Janet Jackson's boobie.

20630
Talk Zone / Re: Wot? No Beer Thread?
« on: February 03, 2007, 06:59:33 pm »
Quote:

The Shiner dunkelweizen is excellent.  Most of the time when seasonal beers come out I'll just buy them once to try them, but I've picked some of this up several times this year.

I also agree that the 97 is very good.  I even liked the 96 last year, though it was a little wimpy for a M?rzen.  But then O-Fests are probably my favorite style if I was forced to pick one.

Great, now I need to go to the store...




Can't find 97 anywhere.  It's starting to piss me off.  That stuff was great!

20631
Talk Zone / Re: Slinging Charlie Hayes in little league brawl.
« on: February 02, 2007, 06:50:23 pm »
Quote:

I didn't see that he used his weapon of choice, but I think he has a concealed weapons license for it.



I have yet to see anyone, other than Quasimodo, carry a chair in a shoulder holster.

20632
Talk Zone / Re: Wot? No Beer Thread?
« on: February 02, 2007, 06:41:40 pm »
Never tried it, but whatever the case, I'm sure it's better than your typical Euro-beer

20633
Talk Zone / Wot? No Beer Thread?
« on: February 02, 2007, 06:20:50 pm »
Shiner Dunkelweizen.  Rich and wheaty, perhaps a little sweet, but enjoyable nonetheless.  Not as good as "97".

Discuss.

20634
Talk Zone / Re: iPods in the dugout?
« on: January 31, 2007, 06:06:34 pm »
Quote:

Bring beaver shooting into the 21st century?



Technology at work for the greater good.

20635
Talk Zone / Re: But the day is already half over!
« on: January 31, 2007, 05:11:52 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Speaking of which, I saw a commercial recently for Sexy Scissors.  Yikes!  Even the "hair technicians" they showed in the commercial were skanks.




A rare event of truthful advertising.




You're assuming that those girls shown cutting hair weren't just rounded up from a cultural exhibition somewhere near the airport, to substitute for the actual hairdressers, who aren't as presentable.  Especially in a bikini.

20636
Talk Zone / Re: iPods in the dugout?
« on: January 31, 2007, 05:07:54 pm »
They need iPhones.  That way, they can study flim, keep up with out of town scores and take photos of chicks in the stands to e-mail to each other.

20637
Talk Zone / Re: But the day is already half over!
« on: January 31, 2007, 11:01:57 am »
Quote:

Clemens is going to SportsClips to have his hair styled and his tips frosted.   NTTAWWT.



Speaking of which, I saw a commercial recently for Sexy Scissors.  Yikes!  Even the "hair technicians" they showed in the commercial were skanks.

20638
Talk Zone / Re: Caption contest
« on: January 29, 2007, 06:07:23 pm »
This: pitcher's mound.  This: strike zone.  This: Smack on Head.

20639
Talk Zone / Re: How close was Jon Garland to being an Astro?
« on: January 29, 2007, 02:44:49 pm »
Quote:

I just can't understand Pettitte.  He was upset that Houston didn't bend over for him, but yet he was saying I am not sure I want to play.  To me he acted like a fickle little school girl.



All this ignores the greater truth, that New York is where God wants Andy to be.  All other machinations are moot in the face of His will.

20640
Talk Zone / Re: BFIBs spurned
« on: January 29, 2007, 11:59:51 am »
Pujols is well on his way to filling Barry Bonds' very large hat.

20641
Talk Zone / Re: Wow.
« on: January 26, 2007, 01:37:13 pm »
Quote:

His point was, if he needs to dive, maybe... just maybe... he's prone to being out of position or even getting late jumps on a ball that others great centerfielders catch in stride.



See also Bell, Derek.

20642
Talk Zone / Re: Wow.
« on: January 26, 2007, 01:01:19 pm »
Quote:

I disagree.  I think it's because he doesn't have to make Sportcenter highlight plays to do everything.  He's got such good instincts, range, and positions himself so well, he doesn't have to go diving after everything up the middle or in the hole.  He's so fucking good that he doesn't attract the mindless' attention.



Good point.  See Jeter, Derek.

20643
Talk Zone / Re: Wow.
« on: January 26, 2007, 12:16:44 pm »
Quote:

In all seriousness, this is a case of Everett "hasn't" won the gold glove instead of "can't" win the gold glove.

He'll have one soon I bet.




He won't win one until he attracts the attention of the voters with his bat.  They pick the best hitter who can play defense without tripping over his own dick.

20644
Talk Zone / Re: Non-bb: Go Saints!
« on: January 26, 2007, 09:21:45 am »
Quote:

Off topic (or on with the you're v your)

Why is it that on internet boards everywhere mongaloids continue to talk about their teams L as a loose, or how their team is loosing.  This drives me up the wall. It even happens on college message boards which leads me to shake my head in bewilderment.  

I'm about the worlds worst speller but this one drives me up the wall. Who freaking can't spell lose correctly?




I agree.  Fucking loosers.

20645
Talk Zone / Re: Non-bb: Go Saints!
« on: January 26, 2007, 09:18:48 am »
Quote:

And by the way, funny is not when you get the joke, it's when other people get the joke.  The trickiest part of that is knowing your audience.



I got the joke.  But then, I'm an insolent prick too.

20646
Talk Zone / Re: Non-bb: Go Saints!
« on: January 22, 2007, 03:31:02 pm »
Quote:

Name your top five Sports Men of Integity?



Any list that does not include Jeff Bagwell, is instantly disqualified.

20647
Talk Zone / Re: Astros sign Brian Moehler
« on: January 19, 2007, 10:09:34 pm »
Quote:

Astros signed RHP Brian Moehler to a minor league contract and invited him to spring training per rotoworld.com



Clearly they weren't aware that I'm available.

20648
Talk Zone / Re: Cubs are printing money
« on: January 19, 2007, 08:06:26 pm »
Baker's gone, yet young pitchers still want loadsa moolah before they'll sign with the Cubs.

20649
Archive / Re: "I'm not greedy," AJones said.
« on: January 19, 2007, 03:54:52 pm »
Quote:

Andruw Jones looks like a tool here, but how can anybody living in 2007 say this is in the top 5000 things that are "what's wrong with society today?" The fucking US Attorney General just said that habeus corpus is not guranteed for everybody and I'm supposed to take out my pitchfork and torch for some dumbass outfielder for the Braves?!



Rolling back the clock to before 1215.  Not a quarter past noon, but 1215AD.

20650
Archive / Re: "I'm not greedy," AJones said.
« on: January 19, 2007, 03:51:03 pm »
Quote:

But that has nothing to do with whether the tax is unjustly high on the people who do have to pay it. I'm not persuaded by the notion that something overly burdensome is OK as long as me and likely everyone I'll ever meet won't have to deal with it.



How is the Estate Tax overly burdensome?

Quote:

If you have a problem with stepped-up basis at death, say so. Don't pretend the estate tax is there to resolve the problem.



It's the current solution, but that's not the tax' only function.

Quote:

Tax it once as income, and let that be the end of it.



Income to who?

Quote:

I don't care what Roosevelt was on about. Do you think that today's estate tax is promixately representative of user fees for services used? If so, then why have the high exemptions? Why not impose them on everyone as a reflection of the resources they use?

The estate-tax-as-user-fees argument is a fantasy under today's system.




That's not only point of the Estate Tax.

20651
Archive / Re: "I'm not greedy," AJones said.
« on: January 19, 2007, 03:42:11 pm »
Quote:

I don't care what the cut-off is or could be.  In principle, I find the idea objectionable.  And that is not self serving.  I am of the background where the only thing I'll inherit are some old lamps and a stick of gum.  The gum, by the way, just might be older than the lamps.



I find all tax objectionable.  But that doesn't mean that I think we can get along without paying any.  I just don't understand why Estate Tax is such a big issue, when it applies to almost no one, yet AMT captures more and more people every year despite being designed specifically to trap the only super-rich!

20652
Archive / Re: "I'm not greedy," AJones said.
« on: January 19, 2007, 03:34:05 pm »
Quote:

You do understand, don't you, that there was no significant income tax at the time Teddy Roosevelt said that?



...and there's little significant Estate Taxation now.  At the current threshold, 99.5% of estates would not attract Estate Tax if the owner died this year.  Next year, the threshold increases and that tax-free group rises to 99.7%.

Quote:

Drayton McLane pays taxes on his income, and what he keeps he accumulates as wealth. But then you're saying that the government should take another big chunk of it because Paris Hilton is a twit?



Paris Hilton was just fighting hyperbole with hyperbole.

But look at it another way.  Drayton bought the Astros for circa $100mm, and it's currently valued (last time I looked) at around $250mm.  If he sold it to anyone including his offspring, he'd pay capital gains tax.  If he died and bequeathed it to anyone but his offspring, they pay income tax.  If he bequeaths it to his offspring, and there's no Estate Tax, that capital gain is never taxed.  Ever.

I am happy to accept arguments that the thresholds or tax rates may not be appropriate (I think 45% is crazy), but I don't accept that there is anything inherently unjust in the tax in principle.

Quote:

And it's a fallacy to pretend that it's anything other than coercion (just as all taxes are). I admit that I think a certain amount of coercion in the form of taxes is necessary for society to operate.

But pretending that the estate tax is really just user fees for use of the highways by the Wallet's trucks is a bit euphemistic, isn't it?




Are you kidding?  The Wallet using public roads in the course of his business is exactly what Teddy was on about.

20653
Archive / Re: "I'm not greedy," AJones said.
« on: January 19, 2007, 03:11:24 pm »
Quote:

Do you think that this tortured logic somehow supports the estate tax? Do you think that things should somehow be different so that people would be dissuaded from building wealth? What exactly are you advocating?



Supporting the Estate Tax?  It's one of the original tenets of the Estate Tax.  It was a reaction to the emergence of a European-style hereditary aristocracy in the late 18th century (the robber barons).  It was decided that wealth was not created in a vacuum and, as such, the wealthy owed a debt to the nation that provided the infrastructure that allowed such wealth to be created.

Regardless, it currently has a threshold of $2mm, below which you pay no Estate Tax and above which you only pay on the amount in excess of $2mm.  The whole debate is red herring, because the tax currently applies to a fraction of 1% of the population - literally (and I mean that literally) a few hundred thousand people in a nation of 300 million.  The fact that this seems to be an issue for the masses is mystery to me.

Perhaps the debate would be shorter if, instead of dubbing it the "Death Tax", it was more correctly (IMHO) dubbed the "Paris Hilton Tax".  Honestly, I think only the bill passed to keep Terri Schiavo alive applies to fewer people than the Estate Tax.

20654
Archive / Re: "I'm not greedy," AJones said.
« on: January 19, 2007, 02:49:05 pm »
Quote:

So making someone give a large chunk of his wealth at death to the government to dissuade his descendants from being idle does not constitute a form of coercion?



It's not coercion, it's a reflection of how such wealth was generated in the first place.

Take Drayton McLane.  He made himself extremely wealthy by trucking goods around the US.  His business was based in no small part upon the use of the fantastic, high-speed, well made, well maintained, well policed and well planned road infrastructure, built at taxpayers' expense.  Would he have made anywhere near as much money if the roads had been single lane dirt tracks?

I refer back to the (Teddy) Roosevelt quote:
?The man of great wealth owes a particular obligation to the State because he derives special advantages from the mere existence of government.?

20655
Archive / Re: "I'm not greedy," AJones said.
« on: January 19, 2007, 02:24:56 pm »
Quote:

There oughta be a law against advocating that there oughta be a law to coerce every form of so-called good behavior.



Coerce?  No.  You can still set generations of spawn up for a life of leisure, it's just expensive.  Like driving a gas-guzzler.

20656
Archive / Re: "I'm not greedy," AJones said.
« on: January 19, 2007, 02:20:27 pm »
Quote:

What kills me is that it is entirely possible to pass on a fortune to your children while at the same time instilling in them a strong positive and lifelong work ethic.  It ain't the money, it's the parenting.



See Hilton, Paris.

20657
Archive / Re: "I'm not greedy," AJones said.
« on: January 19, 2007, 02:15:52 pm »
Quote:

Proverbs 13:22 (King James Version)
 22A good man leaveth an inheritance to his children's children: and the wealth of the sinner is laid up for the just.




I don't disagree.  But I don't read this to mean that the good man's children's children should be so wealthy as to be able to do nothing.  "Inherentence" could mean a family business.

20658
Archive / Re: "I'm not greedy," AJones said.
« on: January 19, 2007, 02:10:38 pm »
Quote:

Spack ain't just the court.  He's the cop, DA, judge, hangman, and spleen eater all in one.



Right.  He's not happy if he hangs you and your head doesn't come off.

20659
Archive / Re: "I'm not greedy," AJones said.
« on: January 19, 2007, 02:08:08 pm »
Quote:

But seriously, do you have to drag politics into another thread?  I mean, my God, next thing you know wiretapping crap will creep into this thread, and... well there it is, now see what you've done.



Knew I was tapdancing on the line with the content, but the idea was to highlight how wrong Jones' stance was.  The laws have been designed to avoid generations of useless couch spuds existing entirely on daddy's, granddaddy's or great-great-great granddaddy's money.

20660
Archive / Re: "I'm not greedy," AJones said.
« on: January 19, 2007, 02:04:37 pm »
Quote:

Interesting that you quote two men who rose to power thanks in no small part to an inheireted family fortune.



History is irony (not a frikkin' weather forecast Alannis).

20661
Talk Zone / Re: Neil Sellers
« on: January 19, 2007, 02:01:40 pm »
Quote:

Marc Sacommanno will probably make the RR roster after two years at AA.  I see Sellers as the opening day 3B choice at CC.



"Sacomanno" may be the most macho name in all of sports.  Shame it's gayified (NTTAWWT) buy the use of a "c" in his first name.

20662
Archive / Re: "I'm not greedy," AJones said.
« on: January 19, 2007, 01:52:27 pm »
Quote:

this is one of the main things wrong with the world today:

"But you want to be completely set to the point where your son's son doesn't have to do anything...."




One of the functions of the Estate Tax is to prevent the formation of a hereditary aristocracy.  Theodore Roosevelt recognized that wealthy citizens benefited particularly from government protection of wealth and property rights.  In 1906 he said ?The man of great wealth owes a particular obligation to the State because he derives special advantages from the mere existence of government.?

Years later Franklin Roosevelt added ?Great accumulations of wealth cannot be justified on the basis of personal and family security ? Such inherited economic power is as inconsistent with the ideals of this generation as inherited political power was inconsistent with the ideals of the generation which established our government.?

The whole point of making each individual responsible for their own success seems lost these days.

20663
Archive / Re: "I'm not greedy," AJones said.
« on: January 19, 2007, 01:00:35 pm »
Quote:

Speaking of A. Jones, my hometown's very first Hooters opened the other day.



I think you're mixing up your Joneses.  No matter, Jones smack is always valid.

20664
Archive / Re: "I'm not greedy," AJones said.
« on: January 19, 2007, 12:24:15 pm »
Two chicks at the same time is greedy.

"I didn't do nothing wrong," said Braves center fielder Andruw Jones after testifying in the Gold Club racketeering case. Well, aside from using a double-negative, he did engage in a menage a trois at a local hotel with two women he'd never met after being carted in by a local sex club.

The Link

20665
Talk Zone / Re: Best Steroid Excuse ever.... (non BB)
« on: January 18, 2007, 06:56:05 pm »
Quote:

Well, as reported on another thread, I witnessed a man purchasing a Schlitz 12 pack yesterday.  I would like to know if anyone on the board has tried a Schlitz lately, and can confirm if it would or would not compare to Morgan Ensberg's batting approach.

Better?




Schlitz cures yeast infections.

20666
Talk Zone / Re: Best Steroid Excuse ever.... (non BB)
« on: January 18, 2007, 05:19:29 pm »
So we can infer that the hottie in question was in the process of treating a yeast infection, yet still let he partner go down on her.  That's not right.

20667
Talk Zone / Re: Ostrich of the Year Award
« on: January 18, 2007, 04:45:52 pm »
Quote:

You know, this post got me to thinking about how useful that Brit dry sense of humor can be.  Case in point:  The phrase "With all due respect" can be (and I suspect often is) used in cases where it is quite clear that the speaker believes that absolutely no actual respect is due.  Much more satisfyingly subtle than the direct, American approach of calling someone out.



Ironically, for all the (not unjustified) stereotypes of the overly polite Brit (see Grant, Hugh), our press is much more intrusive.

Case in point, Jeremy Paxman is the BBC's answer to Larry King or Barbera Walters.  He refuses to accept a bullshit answer to one of his questions and will pummel the bullshitter until they either answer or are shown up to be full of it.  Paxman isn't unique in Limeyland, but he is at the head of the class.  This isn't O'Reillyesque shouting down in favour of expounding his own opinion, this is dogged pursuit of an answer to a question.

The Best of Paxman

The difference over here is that there seems to be a fear or lack of will on the part of the media to do a truly hard interview on anyone.  I think they're worried about losing access, which is a shame and a disservice to the public.  In the UK, if a politician, for example, refuses to engage Paxman or one of his ilk, they are presumed to have something to hide.  People go on Paxman's show because they want the credibility that comes with it.  Here, the Kings of this world will sacrifice credibility for the "get".

Could you imagine if Paxman had moderated one the of Bush-Kerry debates?  I think both would've been gibbering wrecks at the end.  But you would have something more on which to judge the candidates than their carefully prepared talking points.

In a similar vein, each week the Prime Minister is subject to open questioning in the House of Commons.  There, he/she is lobbed softballs and hand grenades in varying proportions and has to face down the rowdy crowd.

Blair under the cosh.

20668
Talk Zone / Re: BudGirl probably already knows this, but...
« on: January 18, 2007, 03:29:13 pm »
Quote:

So Ausmus has hockey ties, too, further endearing him to BG.



He doesn't need the hockey ties.  It's a little known fact that the transcript of the court proceedings for the restraining order against BG is the only official court document in which the phrase "wetter than an otter's pocket" has appeared.

20669
Talk Zone / Re: Ostrich of the Year Award
« on: January 18, 2007, 03:23:43 pm »
I think I know a gazillion people who openly admit that they're "useless" until they've had their first cup o' joe in the morning.  How much of a stretch is it to think that a player might be able to perform at a level, and maintain that level, by taking speed?!!!

Was there any follow-up question?  "With all due respect, Mr. Moores, you know you're talking bollocks, right?"

20670
Talk Zone / Re: Rangers load up on greasepaint
« on: January 18, 2007, 12:25:49 pm »
Quote:

Cirque du Sammy?



[golfclap]

I think we have a new Funk and Wagner entry.

20671
Talk Zone / Posh Develops Eating Disorder after 5 Minutes in LA
« on: January 18, 2007, 12:14:39 pm »
From The Brushback:

LOS ANGELES--Posh Beckham, wife of British soccer star David Beckham, reportedly developed a severe eating disorder just five minutes after her plane landed at Los Angeles International Airport on Friday. A witness said the former Spice Girl rushed into the bathroom and vomited up a bag of peanuts she ate on the plane, then commented that she is ?so fat.?

?Posh got off the plane, took a look around at some of the other females in the area, and immediately ran into the bathroom to throw up,? said the witness. ?When she came out, she looked pale and sick. Her assistant asked if she needed medical attention and she was like ?No, I?m not sick. I?m just fat. I?m a fat, disgusting cow. Look at me. Look at how fat my face is. Everybody?s staring at me. Get me out of here!? Then they just ran out, and the whole time she was covering her face and her belly.?

Beckham?s handlers were optimistic about the situation, however, explaining that an eating disorder would help her fit in among LA?s elite. They also suggested Beckham make a sex tape and become an alcoholic.

20672
Talk Zone / Re: Admins/Moderators...look to the Guinea Pig
« on: January 17, 2007, 01:07:47 pm »
Quote:

He's working his way through Jane's Defense Intelligence Equipment catalog.  He just adds prepositions and viola, best selling novel.



That was fine until he took his reluctant hero and turned him into a reluctant, but becoming ever less so, politician.

20673
Talk Zone / Re: snow
« on: January 16, 2007, 07:24:20 pm »
Quote:

Now, I've been really, really drunk at Duddley's and never  got the boot.  How the hell do you get kicked out of Dudley's?



The lunch shift are less tolerant, apparently.

20674
Talk Zone / Re: Lamb signed
« on: January 16, 2007, 07:21:43 pm »
Quote:

But surely he shouldn't expect to get a deal like Crede?



Funny.  He's asked for $0.04mm less than Crede.

20675
Talk Zone / Re: snow
« on: January 16, 2007, 03:27:00 pm »
Quote:

Yesterday I sent myself home from work ten minutes after I got there, but made sure to grab some "necessary" items from the Tigermart on the way home. Clerk looked at me crazy; guess he isn't used to seeing people buy an 18-pack at 8am on a Monday.



Ahhhh.  Monday mornings in College Station.

20676
Talk Zone / Re: snow
« on: January 16, 2007, 02:50:44 pm »
Quote:

i was thinking frozen margs. brilliant minds....



Recipe:  Mix lime juice, tequila and triple sec/cointreau in a pitcher.  Leave outside for 5 minutes.  Serve in a salt rimmed glass.

20677
Talk Zone / Re: Lamb signed
« on: January 16, 2007, 02:05:59 pm »
Quote:

Maybe it's not him, maybe it's the Astros.  They had 9 arb contracts to get through.  Maybe they're doing the easy ones, the one year deals, first.  Everett, Lidge, Ensberg and Lane left to go.  I see Lane signing next.  Another 1 year deal.



Ha!  The Astros signing Lane is about as likely as Houston freezing o...

Bugger.

20678
Talk Zone / Re: Lamb signed
« on: January 16, 2007, 01:48:53 pm »
Quote:

He might need therapy afterwards. Or at least a hug from Drayton.



"Drayton don't hug"
  -  Andy Pettitte

20679
Talk Zone / TZ 101
« on: January 16, 2007, 10:54:08 am »
You subject line should have read "The Signing of the Lamb".

Here endeth the lesson.

20680
Talk Zone / Re: Jason Lane
« on: January 14, 2007, 02:46:18 pm »
Quote:

Right on.  I'll go ahead and fall in line now, because I'm sure others are tired of clicking on the Jason Lane thread and seeing this go on and on...



Actually, watching a pompous prick trying to suck his own cock in someone else's living room is a great way to pass the offseason.

20681
Talk Zone / Re: A contract that makes $55M to Meche look rational:
« on: January 12, 2007, 06:57:39 pm »
Quote:

Sounds like they're a bit snarky that Beckham's getting $250 million and they're not.



They're snarky about everybody - rich and poor alike.

20682
Talk Zone / Re: A contract that makes $55M to Meche look rational:
« on: January 12, 2007, 03:20:47 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

he is no doubt drawn to the US by the mouthwatering prospect of lining out with Galaxicos such as Landon Donovan and Cobi Jones in a club that clearly plans to transform itself from a team of obscure no-hopers to an international laughing stock.




This is just outstanding stuff.




The Guardian sports writers spend every day bashing many nails squarely on their heads with wit and humour.  They're the anti-Chronicle.

20683
Talk Zone / Re: A contract that makes $55M to Meche look rational:
« on: January 12, 2007, 02:38:42 pm »
Quote:

Ali G asking Posh if she'd been "backdoored" by Beckham was pretty freaking funny to me.

I would love to hear how they had been prepped for this "interview."




I don't think they knew exactly what he was going to say, but they had to know that they were going to get the Ali G treatment.  They willingly threw themselves onto the barbs of Cohen's wit in the spirit of charity.

20684
Talk Zone / Re: A contract that makes $55M to Meche look rational:
« on: January 12, 2007, 01:33:37 pm »
Quote:

MLS changed the rule to allow one exception to the salary cap.  Expect each franchise to have it's own designated has-been lined up for the new season.



The latest from the wags at the Guardian's "Fiver" magazine:

DAVIDS DOES DALLAS

The filthy paparazzi who earn their living by rummaging through David Beckham's dustbin today confirmed that the former England captain recently discarded several empty milk cartons, a handful of used batteries and up to 83 bits of fluff - proof, if any were needed, that Goldenballs is serious about turning his back on superfluous material goods in order to selflessly devote himself to missionary work in the United States. And the 31-year-old footballer-turned-philanthropist spoke out to reiterate that point today.

Though visibly tired from almost 24 hours of high-fiving the agents who negotiated the sacrifice that will earn him just under $1m-per-week over the next five years, Beckham mustered enough earnestness to again tell hacks: "This move for me is not about the money, it's about making a difference in the US with the soccer." And having seamlessly dropped 'football' for 'soccer', the ever PR-savvy evangelist continued his sermon by adding: "Kids there are brought up with soccer to a certain age and then they seem to go into other areas. Hopefully that's what I'll be there for, to pass my experience on to them."

Beckham's trailblazing altruism has already inspired a slew of footballing old folks to follow his noble lead, with burger-bodied Brazilian striker Ronaldo being without doubt the biggest player to have immediately instructed his agents to hook him up with some MLS sucke ... sorry, club. "Football will only take off if Beckham's not the only one, you need a few more," explained French sage Arsenal Wenger, adding: "If American football wants to make a big leap, it will need an influx of big stars." His conscience duly pricked, elderly Spurs outcast Edgar Davids was another to answer America's call-to-alms. "We spoke to his agents and have been told he's available," whooped Dallas Burn boss Steve Morrow, almost as loudly as Davids and his agents whooped when they heard they may be off to the home of the whopping salary.

20685
Talk Zone / Re: A contract that makes $55M to Meche look rational:
« on: January 12, 2007, 01:18:30 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

but to call him brilliant in his prime is a little overstating it.  





I disagree.

The Link



Gimme some time, a web connection and some editing software, and I'll put together a stunning highlight reel for Jason Lane.  It'll include a pennant-winning outfield put-out.

ETA:  That was, what, 5 goals in total on that reel?  The man's been playing in the pros since he was a teenager!  And the goal against Greece was extremely important almost entirely because he and the whole England team had played like dogshit, at home, against Greece, and were just about to be dumped out of the World Cup on their collectively overpaid and under-performing backsides.  Take a look at the scoreline and the clock on that highlight - he had played the previous 90+ minutes too.

Yes he was good a free kicks, but he was nowhere near automatic.  He score more than 10 goals in one season just once.  Once!  And (IIRC) he was the designated penalty taker ferchrissake!

End of rant.

20686
Talk Zone / Re: A contract that makes $55M to Meche look rational:
« on: January 12, 2007, 11:50:24 am »
Quote:

So Limey.  I suppose the biggest question for you is how bad is the American version of "footballers wives" going to be.



Could anything be worse?  Maybe they'll dust of Joan Collins to play the superstar wife of an English has-been who totally unbalances a team by playing badly for enough money to make Solomon blush.

In the meantime, we'll have to make do with Ali G's interview of the Beckhams for the Brit version of Comic Relief.

20687
Talk Zone / Re: A contract that makes $55M to Meche look rational:
« on: January 12, 2007, 11:33:14 am »
Quote:

Deserved, didn't deserve, many people didn't think he should have been. Regardless of that, he was.  You ARE knocking him, and to some extent he does deserves that.  England laid a fat egg in Germany and he was the Captain.  I think many more point the finger of blame at Sven Goran Erickson than the team Captain.  Beckham was brilliant in his prime and on the 06 squad still possesed one of the most deadly free kicks in the game.



Erickson's squad selection was horrendous, and for that he gets an awful lot of the blame.  However, Beckham was one of the problems, not one of the solutions, in that squad selected by the randy Swede.  And Beckham hasn't been deadly at dead balls for years.

20688
Talk Zone / Re: A contract that makes $55M to Meche look rational:
« on: January 12, 2007, 11:29:52 am »
Quote:

Quote:


Did Ronaldo officially sign in Saudi, or is it just an offer?





No, Luis Figo signed there.  Ronaldo is rumored to be NY bound.




MLS changed the rule to allow one exception to the salary cap.  Expect each franchise to have it's own designated has-been lined up for the new season.

20689
Talk Zone / Re: A contract that makes $55M to Meche look rational:
« on: January 12, 2007, 11:27:18 am »
Quote:

Head and shoulders may be a bit strong.  Beckham, while no longer in his prime, is not even a year removed of being the CAPTAIN of England.  I think the two players you are talking about, Ching (?), who is not even a full time starter for the US (yet) and DeRosario who is still unproven on the world stage are super player, but let's keep this in perspective.  This is a BIG deal for the MLS.  Fringe fans are exactly who they are trying to attract with this signing.



Just for the record, there were many, many people, fans (like me) and experts alike, who thought Beckham shouldn't have been in the England squad for years, let alone Captain (a job at which he sucked).

Beckham never had any pace, could never tackle, could never beat anyone decent on the dribble and could never head a ball.  Now he is even more limited, reduced to being a one-trick pony: dead ball specialist (excluding penalities - at which he sucks), and he powers there too have faded notably.

20690
Talk Zone / Re: A contract that makes $55M to Meche look rational:
« on: January 12, 2007, 11:12:51 am »
The Guardian's football wits' verdict on the Beckham move:

WORST IN SHOW

According to the Battersea Dogs' Home website, "giving a home to a rescue animal is one of the most rewarding experiences a person can have". However, they warn: "It is important to know and feel that you are ready to take on the commitment of another life, a life that will be totally dependent on you for up to 15 years." Or just five, if the mangy mutt in question answers to the name Becks. For this afternoon, it emerged that flea-bitten England and Real Madrid has-been David Beckham will up stick (or Victoria, as she is also known) from Spain and go to the USA for 1,825 final bumper pay-days with LA Galaxy in Major League Soccer.

"This week, Real Madrid asked me to make a decision regarding my future and the offer to extend my contract by a further two seasons," parped Becks. "After discussing several options with my family and advisers to either stay here at Madrid or join other major British and European clubs, I have decided to join the Los Angeles Galaxy and play in the MLS from August." It's no big surprise that Becks opted to take the Yankee dollar - after all, the deal in question is worth a wallet-busting, jaw-dropping ?128m (over ?492,000 a week! ?70,285 a day! ?2,928 an hour!) to the washed-up 31-year-old who, even in his sari-wearing, Brylcreemed, petulant pomp, was one of the most over-rated players ever to kick a football.

It should go without saying that the Real Madrid failure claims to be making the move for football reasons, and he is no doubt drawn to the US by the mouthwatering prospect of lining out with Galaxicos such as Landon Donovan and Cobi Jones in a club that clearly plans to transform itself from a team of obscure no-hopers to an international laughing stock. "I look forward to the new challenge of growing the world's most popular game in a country that is as passionate about its sport as my own," he droned, before adding that, in the meantime: "I will continue to give 100% to my coach, team-mates and fans at Real Madrid."

And while the Fiver looks forward to seeing Beckham cheering extra hard from his seat in the Bernabeu stands for the rest of the season, his move has somewhat overshadowed the inexplicable rehoming of fellow mongrels Djimi Traore* (Portsmouth from Charlton for ?1m), Jon Stead (Sheffield United from Sunderland for ?750,000) and Ben Thatcher (Charlton from Manchester City, undisclosed). Before news broke of the former England skipper's move to Hollywood broke, we incorrectly assumed they'd be the most preposterous transfer stories we'd hear today.

* FYI, the hapless Traore (pronounced "tray-or-ee") earned the not-so-rare privilege of having a song sung about him by his home fans:

Don't blame it on the sunshine
Don't blame it on the moonlight
Don't blame it on the good times
Blame it on Traore

He just can't
He just can't
He just can't control his feet.
etc.

20691
Talk Zone / Re: god's messenger has been on New York radio all day
« on: January 12, 2007, 09:46:24 am »
Quote:

I think in his heart, he wanted to be in Houston, but he way overplayed his hand and had his bluff called by the team which forced him to NY.



Ding! Ding! Fucking! Ding!

Hence his continued bleating about it.  If he wanted to be in NYC, he'd be gushing all over the place about how good it is to be back there, instead of bleeding all over everyone about Houston.

20692
Talk Zone / Re: Useless info re Guinea Pig
« on: January 10, 2007, 04:29:25 pm »
Quote:

Is Spitfire available in the US?



I've not seen Spitfire here.  But you can get Neame's other great strong ale Bishop's Finger*.  Beware: 5.4% ABV.

* The dominant character of this premium ale is its generous, fruity flavour, reminiscent of bananas and pears with citrus overtones. A full-bodied, nut-brown, nourishing ale with a lingering hoppy finish, an ideal companion to food, or it can serve as a delicious digestive after a meal.

20693
Talk Zone / Re: Useless info re Guinea Pig
« on: January 10, 2007, 12:58:31 pm »
Quote:

Not to mention the beer--Shepherd's Neame Spitfire (not the bottled, the real stuff) is the finest beer in the land. Or one of them, at least.



Ahhh.  A brew from my home county (I am a Man of Kent, not Kentish).

Spitfire:  "Crafted from traditional varieties of English malt, this golden ale combines an underlying depth of maltiness, tinged with a subtle hint of toffee, with the bold citrus and fruity spiciness of Kentish hops, to produce a well-balanced, thirst quenching, popular drink."

20694
Talk Zone / Re: Ripken, Gwynn (as expected) voted into HOF
« on: January 10, 2007, 12:26:34 pm »
Quote:

McGwire never hid his use of Andro...



Conspiracy theorists amongst the BFiBs have said they believe that the accidental discovery of Andro was anything but accidental.  It was a deliberate plant to move the conversation away from steroids, they say.

20695
Talk Zone / Re: Useless info re Guinea Pig
« on: January 10, 2007, 10:54:11 am »
Quote:

An unfortunate design feature of the Spitfire placed the fuel tank directly forward of the cockpit. Often when the tank was damaged, the fuel would ignite and spill directly onto the pilot.



Many suffered for the art of such a gorgeous aeroplane.  To see a Spit. in full flow is a treat, to hear one is divine.  Perhaps the greatest exhaust signature of all time.

Greatest gag ever told by a crap comedian on prime-time TV, that promptly got him banned for same:
Stan Boardman was on the BBC equivalent of "The Tonight Show".  He was telling a story about his father from WW2.  His Dad, you see, was a Spitfire pilot.  One day, while out on patrol, his squadron got bounced by a bunch of Fokkes (pronounced Fokker).  He shot down one of the Fokkes, but in doing so picked one up on his tail.  He ducked and dived and did everything he could think of, but he could not shake this Fokke.

The host interjected that the Fokke was an exceptionally good dogfighting aircraft, to which Stan replied "Yes.  But this Fokke was in a Messerschmitt!"

20696
Talk Zone / Re: Glossary Updates
« on: January 10, 2007, 10:44:43 am »
Quote:

In the '04 games, the real beanball war was in the final game of the series, when I think four players were hit (officially), from each team - Berkman, Beltran, Lee and somebody else on the Cubs - and a few others were brushed back.  That was the day Mike Remlinger went apeshit, among others.  For missing Berkman's head, which he'd just thrown at.  The ball instead ticked off the bat (behind the helmet, which it just missed, as Lance bailed out); but Berkman went down like he was shot.  If I was the umpire, I'd have given him 1B too, even if it wasn't great acting (I think Berkman was reacting out of fear as much as anything.)



It's funny that this series is remembered for the beanball war.  IIRC, there was about 8 Astros hit and 1 or 2 Cubs.  The "war" only broke out when the Astros had had enough of that shit, and pushed back a little.  It was a one way street until very late in the day.

20697
Talk Zone / Re: Random HOF stat of the day...
« on: January 10, 2007, 10:29:31 am »
Quote:

In his entire 20-year career (1982-2001), Tony Gwynn only struck out 434 times. From 1999-2001, Preston Wilson K'd 450 times.



Gwynn's strike zone was much smaller than that for other players: it was 50% occupied by his gut.

20698
Talk Zone / Re: Admins/Moderators...look to the Guinea Pig
« on: January 10, 2007, 09:58:25 am »
Quote:

Clancy's books through "The Sum of All Fears" are great reads, with a good amount of detail well balanced with story.  After that point, they slowly tailed off into egotistical bloat, with "Bear and the Dragon" and "Red Rabbit" crossing the line into unreadable.



That's about the point I bailed: half-way through the book that followed Sum of All Fears.

20699
Talk Zone / Re: Ripken, Gwynn (as expected) voted into HOF
« on: January 09, 2007, 05:00:12 pm »
Quote:

Bill Simmons made  a good comment along that line of thought:

 
Quote:

Watch the end of "61*" sometime, or reread Mike Lupica's gushing book, "Summer of '98." (Note: Lupica now argues that Big Mac doesn't belong in the Hall. He never says anything about returning the profits from his book, however.) The home run chase meant something back then. And by the way, when it was going on, we all chose to overlook the fact that McGwire was a can of green paint away from being the Incredible Hulk and that Sosa looked like he was developing a second jaw. Let's not forget that.
 







Not me.  I was a home-run chase hater the whole season.  And the fuckers cut away from Baggy's first ever granny to show a McTweet 1-3 ground-out!!!!!!

The whole thing was a freak show.  But the woodwork was creaking an hallelujah chorus that year.

20700
Talk Zone / Re: Ripken, Gwynn (as expected) voted into HOF
« on: January 09, 2007, 04:56:19 pm »
Quote:

Also, they didn't always vote annually.



Yep.  Sometimes, they used their brains.

20701
Talk Zone / Re: Glossary Updates
« on: January 09, 2007, 03:46:06 pm »
A guinea pig reminded me of:

Homerun Hitting Vending Machine

20702
Talk Zone / Re: Ripken, Gwynn (as expected) voted into HOF
« on: January 09, 2007, 03:31:31 pm »
Quote:

Or Barry Bonds, for that matter. I think the question will be whether the writers will admit Bonds despite the standard they seem to be setting with McGwire.



In a display of monumental, yet totally expected, hipocrisy, watch 'em vote in Bonds in a landslide.  Of course, Bonds will have to be introduced by his cell mate...

20703
Talk Zone / Re: Jason Lane
« on: January 09, 2007, 02:56:28 pm »
Quote:

Why not Lee, Burke and Scott with Lamb on the bench?



If forgot about Scott.  Nothing to see here.  Please!  Nothing to see here!

20704
Talk Zone / Re: Jason Lane
« on: January 09, 2007, 11:52:10 am »
At this point, my starting outfield is Berkman, Burke and Lee.  Clank mans 1st.  Lane shouldn't even be making the big club out of ST as things stand currently.  He's unsafe at any speed.

20705
Talk Zone / Re: BCS Championship Game
« on: January 09, 2007, 11:46:04 am »
Quote:

Oh please.  Florida just absolutely dismantled the unanimous, wire to wire #1 team in nation.  Give them some credit instead of sucking your own dick for a change.



"Honestly, we've played a lot better teams than them," Defensive End Jarvis Moss said. "I could name four or five teams in the SEC that could probably compete with them and play the same type of game we did against them."

20706
Talk Zone / Re: Separated at Birth: Lance Berkman Annex
« on: January 08, 2007, 06:44:34 pm »
Quote:

No youtube link?!?  Limey, you are getting sloppy.



Nothing available on YouTube.  Instead, here's more proof that soccer players don't know how to fight.

20707
Talk Zone / Re: Some Clemens stuff
« on: January 08, 2007, 06:14:43 pm »
Quote:

so, what changed for Pundit Kennedy?

what an Egomaniac Roger is.




...and yet we're surprised when his apprentice, Mini Mope, bitches about not getting any love.

20708
Talk Zone / Re: Separated at Birth: Lance Berkman Annex
« on: January 08, 2007, 02:25:06 pm »
Quote:

Wow the Hates are STILL around?  Growing up in the Houston punk scene in the early and mid 90's the question was WHY are the Hates still around.  They were always looked at like a joke.  Dude does look like Berkman though.



Saw 'em on Saturday night at the Continental.  Mrs Limey has known Cristian (mohawk) since the 80's.  I don't think they take things too seriously but they are entertaining.  Their version of "Crazy Train", performed on a guitar, double bass and drums, has to be seen!

20709
Talk Zone / Re: Down on strikes- Astros trivia
« on: January 08, 2007, 11:55:30 am »
Quote:

Oh yeah!  Forgot about Lee May.



As a 7 year old boy growing up in England, I remember his 1972 performance was particularly frustrating.

20710
Talk Zone / Re: Down on strikes- Astros trivia
« on: January 08, 2007, 11:50:38 am »
Quote:

Quote:

If Derek Bell isn't #1 or #2, I'll eat my hat.




Try it with a little salt. Bell is not even in the top 5.



Lucky for me I have a chocolate hat.

Lee May is #1, probably (and ironically) holding both that, and the club hitting streak records at the same time.

20711
Talk Zone / Re: Down on strikes- Astros trivia
« on: January 08, 2007, 11:45:43 am »
If Derek Bell isn't #1 or #2, I'll eat my hat.

20712
Talk Zone / Separated at Birth: Lance Berkman Annex
« on: January 08, 2007, 11:28:22 am »
The Hates' bassist (a double bass at that) Dade Deviant.

20713
Talk Zone / Re: Missing Ashes Update
« on: January 08, 2007, 12:53:09 am »
Quote:

I have been following cricket since I moved to New Zealand and I have learned that Australian cricket culture mixes the worst elements of the Yankees, Cowboys, Notre Dame and the Celtics...except they win all of the time.



...at cricket.  They suck at pretty much everything else...including bartending (thank the brewer for the influx of eastern Euros into London - they're better looking, more efficient and have ousted the annoying Aussies).

20714
Talk Zone / Re: 2006 Sportsman of the Year: John Mellencamp
« on: January 06, 2007, 01:02:48 pm »
Classic.  Muchas gracias.

?Our new ad will feature scenes of people playing football and will be aired three dozen times during the [Super Bowl]. Then, when the game is over, the Super Bowl MVP will say ?From the east coast to the west coast down that Dixie highway back home. This is our country? instead of ?I?m going to Disney World.? Then we?re going to debut a new, 10-minute version of the song. Then I?m going to blow my brains out.?

ETA:  This headline cracked me up:  "Ayles Ice Shelf Now More Mobile Than Shaquille O?Neal"

20715
Talk Zone / Re: I need another hobby
« on: January 05, 2007, 05:38:20 pm »
Quote:

Am I wrong to protect my brain from being implanted with alien emanations from untrustworthy frequencies ?  I think that's just good brain goo hygiene.



Maybe Richard Justice is on the same shit as Chief Justice Rehnquist.  Just a thought.

20716
Talk Zone / Re: S(c)hrewd
« on: January 04, 2007, 01:36:03 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

It's the agents job to get the most money for their guys




That is not the agent's job.




Surely there's an inherent conflict of interest when an agent is remunerated as a percentage of the salary negotiated for the client.  If I was a ballplayer, I'd want my agent working for a flat fee.

20717
Talk Zone / Re: Missing Ashes Update
« on: January 04, 2007, 11:08:49 am »
Quote:

Limey --

Would you believe I was just curious if I asked for an Ashes update?




That's not just twisting the knife, that's cutting around the meat.

England coughed up Game #2 (of 5) by folding like a lawn chair on the last day.  Down 0-2 now, that set the stage for a big rally in Game #3...that never happened.  Game over.

Of course, this being cricket they play out all five games anyway.  England, currently down 0-4 in the series having been crushed in Game #4, are about a day away from completing the humiliation in Game #5.

20718
Talk Zone / Re: More Clemens Speculation
« on: January 02, 2007, 04:11:41 pm »
Quote:

Just so we're all clear, Randy Johnson is coming off surgery to repair a herniated disk in his back.  That's not a good thing for a pitcher.



Especially not a pitcher who's back is 8 feet long.

20719
Talk Zone / WOW!
« on: December 29, 2006, 07:00:57 pm »
Quote:

The silliest part is Todd is advocating Loretta as a step up from Biggio.  Here's Loretta's numbers the last 4 years.  See if you can guess when they started steroid testing...


Year--AVG/OBP/SLG

2003--314/372/441
2004--335/391/495
2005--280/360/347
2006--285/345/361

Biggio's OBP is a lot less than Loretta's but his SLG is much higher.  I'm not sure there's a lot of difference in the final offensive output between the 2 players.  

If you want to make a case for Biggio splitting time with Burke at 2B, I'm all for that.  Especially given how Biggio's home/road splits look (I still say Biggio has tinkered with his swing for maximum MMPUS effect, which kills his road productivity).

But I'm not sure how Loretta instead of Biggio makes this a better team on the field.  I'd say to bump out one of the organizations top players of all time, on the verge of a MAJOR career milestone, fan favorite and every single other intangible out there for a guy who is just as good (maybe worse) is the dumbest thing ever.

I'm sure the other players would love that.  "Gee, we can spend an entire career with the Astros only for them to bench me (cut me) when I'm less than 100 hits away from 3000 to bring in a guy whose stats aren't any better than mine."

THATS the ticket.




That's a complete and comprehensive take-down by Foghorn, yet not one expletive.

Are we witnessing the birth of a new Foggy for 2007?  I fucking hope not.

20720
Talk Zone / Re: Zito a Giant
« on: December 29, 2006, 06:46:55 pm »
Quote:

Pitchers are one pitch away from being injured.   You try to minimize that by teaching proper mechanics and all, but overall, it is a foolish investment to give a pitcher at any time a seven year commitment.  Five years is pretty good for the pitcher and still a minor risk.  Three years is a great investment for both parties.

Going seven means you're a desperate team and if this is setting a trend for contracts in the future, then those who follow this lead by the Jints are in fact... STUPID!

I hope Zito lives up to his contract length, but chances are against that happening.  It didn't for Kevin Brown, Randy Johnson nor Mike Hampton.  The first three years of the contract may pay off, but the last four will be difficult for the Jints to carry.  Very difficult.




Irrespective of the inherent "wrongness" of pitching, at 36 he is unlikely to be dominating or even just strong.  If he remains healthy he'll be ok at best (unless he starts eating steaks from HEB), but by then maybe "just ok" costs $18 mil per.

More likely, there's about $40mm on that contract that'll never get earned.

20721
Talk Zone / Re: Zito a Giant
« on: December 28, 2006, 03:07:14 pm »
Quote:

SEVEN years.  Jeeze-O.



He'll be 36 when this contract ends.

Maybe by then, average pitchers will be making $18mm a year.  Maybe.

20722
Talk Zone / Re: Twelve Days of YouTube - Day Ten: Don't Open Until 12/23
« on: December 27, 2006, 11:25:16 am »
Quote:

The drummer was particularly talented.



Nice posture.

20723
Talk Zone / Re: Suppan joins Brew Crew...
« on: December 27, 2006, 11:22:34 am »
Quote:

4 yrs/$42MM

The Link




Not sure how I feel about this one.  That's lots of money but lots of years too.  Quite cheap per year, but then it's a four year commitment.

You see my problem?  Too much money and too many years whilst not being much money for that many years.

You are correct in thinking that I have not been drinking this Christmas.  An enforced abstinence that I shall be correcting shortly.  Say, lunchtime...

20724
Talk Zone / Re: Bagwell #16
« on: December 27, 2006, 11:16:55 am »
Quote:

You're obviously a terrorist, hell bent on destroying our freedom. Oh the irony, Orwell had it right.



Just because raging against the TV wasn't enough, I went back and re-read "1984" for the first time in 25 years.  Before it was just assigned reading, now it's truly terrifying because it's a fucking play book.

Oh, and Merry Christmas everyone.

20725
Talk Zone / Re: Bagwell #16
« on: December 27, 2006, 11:11:25 am »
Quote:

BTW love Love LOVE your avatar. Best rock and roll almum ever...EVER!



The title track is my ring tone:  The ice age is coming, the sun's zooming in...

20726
Talk Zone / Re: Merry Christmas to all who dwell in this house (site(
« on: December 27, 2006, 11:09:08 am »
Quote:

I got an Astros talking bottle opener.



Does it say "That'll be nine-fiddy"?

20727
Talk Zone / Re: Coal for All You Fuckers Who Peeked (nm)
« on: December 22, 2006, 03:02:53 pm »
Quote:

I'll be on the road the next few days. I just downloaded the videos to open on the correct days.



Suuuuuure.  Now see what you've done!

20728
Talk Zone / Coal for All You Fuckers Who Peeked (nm)
« on: December 22, 2006, 01:52:59 pm »
nm

20729
Talk Zone / Twelve Days of YouTube - Day Twelve: Don't Open Until 12/25
« on: December 22, 2006, 11:43:30 am »
On the twelfth day of YouTube my true love gave to me
Twelve Drummers Drumming
Eleven Pipers Piping
Ten Lords a-leaping
Nine Ladies Dancing
Eight Maids a-milking
Seven Swans a-swimming
Six Geese a-laying
FIIIIIIVE GOOOOOOLD RIIIIIIIIIINGS!
Four Calling Birds
Three French hens
Two Turtle Doves
aaand Aaaa Paaaartriiiidge in a Peaaaaar Treeeeeeeeeeee!

20730
Talk Zone / Twelve Days of YouTube - Day Eleven: Don't Open Until 12/24
« on: December 22, 2006, 11:41:11 am »
On the eleventh day of YouTube my true love gave to me
Eleven Pipers Piping
Ten Lords a-leaping
Nine Ladies Dancing
Eight Maids a-milking
Seven Swans a-swimming
Six Geese a-laying
FIIIIIIVE GOOOOOOLD RIIIIIIIIIINGS!
Four Calling Birds
Three French hens
Two Turtle Doves
and A Partridge in a Pear Tree

20731
Talk Zone / Twelve Days of YouTube - Day Ten: Don't Open Until 12/23
« on: December 22, 2006, 11:38:43 am »
On the tenth day of YouTube my true love gave to me
Ten Lords a-leaping
Nine Ladies Dancing
Eight Maids a-milking
Seven Swans a-swimming
Six Geese a-laying
FIIIIIIVE GOOOOOOLD RIIIIIIIIIINGS!
Four Calling Birds
Three French hens
Two Turtle Doves
and A Partridge in a Pear Tree

20732
Talk Zone / Twelve Days of YouTube - Day Nine: A Christmas Spectacle
« on: December 22, 2006, 10:55:14 am »
On the ninth day of YouTube my true love gave to me
Nine Ladies Dancing
Eight Maids a-milking
Seven Swans a-swimming
Six Geese a-laying
FIIIIIIVE GOOOOOOLD RIIIIIIIIIINGS!
Four Calling Birds
Three French hens
Two Turtle Doves
and A Partridge in a Pear Tree

20733
Talk Zone / Re: The Brushback
« on: December 22, 2006, 10:50:13 am »
Quote:

But wouldn't you get any added satisfaction if the DQs lose to the team they left?



Nope.  It would be perfectly fine to be playing on while those two sat on their piles of money watching October baseball on their 800" plasmas.

20734
Talk Zone / Re: Jennings
« on: December 22, 2006, 10:48:06 am »
Quote:

Did he mention anything about owning a ranch?  Is he having an affair?  Did he say anything about the Astros "kept pushing and pushing" while the Rockies "didn't do much?"  These are things we need to know.



Was he wearing underwear?

20735
Talk Zone / Re: The Brushback
« on: December 21, 2006, 06:30:45 pm »
Quote:

It would be fun watching the awkwardness on ESPN if the Yankees lost.

Stuart Scott and co. wouldn't know what to do with themselves. They would probably just re-run old Duke-UNC basketball games for a few weeks.




You're missing the point.  If the Sox and Twins contest the ALCS, the Yanks have already lost.  Egregiously.  And before it can be a heroic loss.  They would be simply one of MLB's also-rans who never made it.

20736
Talk Zone / Re: Bagwell #16
« on: December 21, 2006, 06:06:55 pm »
Quote:

THE Ian Thorpe retired??

My world is shattered.




Thorpedo...done at 24.  Paging Dr. Kavorkian...

20737
Talk Zone / Re: The Brushback
« on: December 21, 2006, 05:46:38 pm »
Quote:

Man if Clemens goes back I'm going to be praying for an Astros-Yankees WS.



Why?  I'd like to see a Red Sox-Twins ALCS.

20738
Talk Zone / Re: The Brushback
« on: December 21, 2006, 02:18:28 pm »
Quote:

The Link with its take on Andy (and Roger).



One of the better op-ed pieces on the subject.  It might turn out to be as prophetic as their tome on  Beltran.

20739
Talk Zone / Re: Centerfield
« on: December 21, 2006, 12:57:09 pm »
Quote:

Tom Smykowski: It was a "Jump to Conclusions" mat. You see, it would be this mat that you would put on the floor... and would have different CONCLUSIONS written on it that you could JUMP TO.

Michael Bolton: That's the worst idea I've ever heard in my life, Tom.

Samir: Yes, this is horrible, this idea.




Whenever people quote a movie...YouTube is there.

20740
Talk Zone / Re: Twelve Days of YouTube - Day Eight: Lookout.....CLIFF!
« on: December 21, 2006, 12:49:59 pm »
Quote:

I was not aware Cliff looked in on little boys through their windows. I thought that was Day Three.



Paging Mark Foley...Paging Mark Foley...

20741
Talk Zone / Twelve Days of YouTube - Day Eight: Lookout.....CLIFF!
« on: December 21, 2006, 11:19:04 am »
On the eigth day of YouTube my true love gave to me
Eight Maids a-milking
Seven Swans a-swimming
Six Geese a-laying
FIIIIIIVE GOOOOOOLD RIIIIIIIIIINGS!
Four Calling Birds
Three French hens
Two Turtle Doves
and A Partridge in a Pear Tree

20742
Talk Zone / Re: Yo Limey, re: 70's British Glam Rock (warning: long and
« on: December 19, 2006, 07:14:35 pm »
Quote:

I always considered it more about a look or fashion then about a sound or genre. A lot of different sounding bands got lumped under the Glam Rock banner. Like most things that take a broad sweep, you get a range of offerings, good and bad. Some of that shit's timeless.



You betcha!

20743
Talk Zone / Twelve Days of YouTube - Day Seven: It's Getting Shaky
« on: December 19, 2006, 07:12:26 pm »
On the seventh day of YouTube my true love gave to me
Seven Swans a-swimming
Six Geese a-laying
FIIIIIIVE GOOOOOOLD RIIIIIIIIIINGS!
Four Calling Birds
Three French hens
Two Turtle Doves
and A Partridge in a Pear Tree

20744
Talk Zone / Twelve Days of YouTube - Day Six: Pass the Dutchie
« on: December 19, 2006, 02:25:31 pm »
On the sixth day of YouTube my true love gave to me
Six Geese a-laying
FIIIIIIVE GOOOOOOLD RIIIIIIIIIINGS!
Four Calling Birds
Three French hens
Two Turtle Doves
and A Partridge in a Pear Tree

20745
Talk Zone / Re: If you think failing a drug test is bad... (non-bb)
« on: December 18, 2006, 05:40:52 pm »
Quote:

Leslie of Austin cashes in The Link on his interpretation of the "characteristics of a woman".



"Miniature accessories include cowboy boots, a tiara, two cans of Lone Star beer and an armadillo on a leash."

Yikes.

20746
Talk Zone / Re: If you think failing a drug test is bad... (non-bb)
« on: December 18, 2006, 03:58:46 pm »
Quote:

Neither does Jamie Lee Curtis, but I still enjoyed Trading Places.



See also Swank, Hilary.

20747
Talk Zone / Twelve Days of YouTube - Day Five: Pass the Valium
« on: December 18, 2006, 01:34:32 pm »
On the fifth day of YouTube my true love gave to me
FIIIIIIVE GOOOOOOLD RIIIIIIIIIINGS!
Four Calling Birds
Three French hens
Two Turtle Doves
and A Partridge in a Pear Tree

20748
Talk Zone / Re: Twelve Days of YouTube: Day Three - You Thought I'd Forg
« on: December 18, 2006, 11:39:44 am »
Quote:

The was one of the worst lip-synching I have ever seen!



Glitter was absolutely horrible at lip-synching.  It was always so off as to be seem almost deliberate.

20749
Talk Zone / Twelve Days of YouTube: Day Four - A Holiday Classic Remade
« on: December 17, 2006, 06:01:54 pm »
On the fourth day of YouTube my true love gave to me
Four Calling Birds
Three French hens
Two Turtle Doves
and A Partridge in a Pear Tree

20750
Talk Zone / Re: Twelve Days of YouTube: Day Three - You Thought I'd Forg
« on: December 17, 2006, 03:11:53 pm »
Quote:

Ah yes, a man who truly  embraces the christmas spirit.

Good song, though.




It got worse.  He got out of jail in the UK, went to paedo-friendly Cambodia but was kicked out, and ended up going back to jail in Vietnam.

A despicable human being.

20751
Talk Zone / Twelve Days of YouTube: Day Three - You Thought I'd Forget?
« on: December 16, 2006, 07:59:07 pm »
On the third day of YouTube, my true love gave to me:
Three French Hens
Two Turtle Doves
and A Partridge in a Pear Tree

20752
Talk Zone / Re: Twelve Days of YouTube - Day Two: More Ridiculous Hair
« on: December 15, 2006, 12:56:46 pm »
Quote:

Maybe it was all the acid, but people seemed to have a lot more fun in those days.



That was back in the day when sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll was very good indeed.  Now it seems that to be a rock star you have to be moody and pissed off on a permanent basis.

20753
Talk Zone / Re: Twelve Days of YouTube - Day Two: More Ridiculous Hair
« on: December 15, 2006, 11:22:25 am »
Quote:

For one brief, not really paying attention moment I thought, "Holy crap!!  Michael Caine was in a band??"



Glam rock legend Noddy Holder.

20754
Talk Zone / Twelve Days of YouTube - Day Two: More Ridiculous Hair
« on: December 15, 2006, 11:00:04 am »
On the second day of YouTube, my true love gave to me:
Two Turtle Doves
and A Partridge in a Pear Tree

20755
Talk Zone / Twelve Days of YouTube
« on: December 14, 2006, 06:56:19 pm »
On the first day of YouTube, my true love gave to me:
A Partridge in a Pear Tree

20756
Talk Zone / Re: Zumaya missed 3 games of ALCS due to Guitar Hero injury
« on: December 14, 2006, 05:58:46 pm »
Quote:

Of course my wife also has Sean Cassidy's greatest hits.  She also just bought the Patridge Family's greatest hits AND the Brady Bunch's greatest hits.



My wife just bought Moi?'s CD (we saw them in NYC) and is ripping her KMFDM and Thrill Kill Cult CDs to iTunes.  We may have found opposite ends of the music spectrum.

20757
Talk Zone / Re: Scraped out of NYCU...
« on: December 14, 2006, 05:47:50 pm »
Quote:

only half those of those 150 qualify for era title(which is where he got his numbers). and if you count relievers, do you really think hed stay at top 25?



So he's in the top 25 of the top 50%, which makes him in the top 12.5% of the top 100%.

I'm glad you don't add up my bar tab.

20758
Talk Zone / Re: Zumaya missed 3 games of ALCS due to Guitar Hero injury
« on: December 14, 2006, 05:41:17 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

you've got to be really pissed to admit to having Barry Manilow and Shaun Cassidy CDs in the house.






My wife has a Shaun Cassidy record.  She made me listen to it the other day.



I would do anything for love.  But I won't do that!

20759
Talk Zone / Re: Red Sox sign Matsuzaka?
« on: December 14, 2006, 05:20:42 pm »
Quote:

You need the power of "I've got another team ready to pounce on X deal if you're not interested...".  The Hendricks Bros know that if they didn't have the Yankees and it was all about Pettitte wanting to come back to Houston exclusively, 12 million, one year would've been a *GREAT* offer.

Anything they say beyond that about "respect" and such is a bunch of hooey!  It's all about market and how to play it.




I wonder: does YanmeeFan feel hosed because "they" paid $32 million for a $12 million player?

20760
Talk Zone / Re: Scraped out of NYCU...
« on: December 14, 2006, 05:17:10 pm »
Quote:

25th out of how many? top 25 of say 75 isnt much to write home about



30 teams, 5-man rotation per team, that's 150 if you don't include relievers or part-time starters.  If you average 12 pitchers a year on each team, that's 360.  Top 25 out of 360 or even 150 is not bad.

20761
Talk Zone / Re: Scraped out of NYCU...
« on: December 14, 2006, 11:18:38 am »
Quote:

No defense is mediocre with Adam Everett at SS and Lance Berkman at 1B.    Heck just everett makes for an average/to above average infield defense.



Also, doesn't the infield typically play a little back in Coors as a matter of course?  Something to do with there being 1 1/2 miles between them and the outfielders, IIRC.  More of Jennings' grounders should become put outs instead of infield singles at MMPUS.

20762
Talk Zone / Re: All you wannabe rockstars from the guitar thread, bow do
« on: December 14, 2006, 11:15:22 am »
Quote:

I have always wondered how much Lava and/or disinfectant one needs to apply after a meeting with Randy Hendricks.



Actually, you have to take off and nuke yourself from orbit.  It's the only way to be sure.

20763
Talk Zone / Re: Red Sox sign Matsuzaka?
« on: December 14, 2006, 01:24:24 am »
Quote:

He *really* isn't that powerful, he just thinks he is.



He's as powerful as the GMs allow him to be, which has been pretty powerful.  I'm seriously considering sending every major league GM a DVD of the Dog Whisperer for the holidays.

20764
Talk Zone / Re: This just in...
« on: December 14, 2006, 01:21:12 am »
Quote:

Wow, I think I just messed my pants. The national sports media figuring out the real deal? Must have read Alyson's mailbag! Or maybe the machinations of Boras, Hendricks et al have become so transparent that not even the national sports media can overlook them anymore.



Haven't the Astros just sloughed off all their remaining Team Bastard and Boras clients this week?

20765
Talk Zone / Re: Digital Cameras
« on: December 13, 2006, 05:53:08 pm »
Quote:

So help a brother out, is the Exilim s what I should be looking at.  (Budget is a concern)



They're fine by me, but I'm not the cameraphile that some in here seem to be.  I evaluate them same as I do most things, go for the one one with the best stats in your price range.  It's a bit like acquiring a new pitcher.

[and lo he removes the "non-BB" from the subject line]

20766
Talk Zone / Re: Digital Cameras (non BB)
« on: December 13, 2006, 04:41:58 pm »
Quote:

I love the retro design of the Leicas.



It almost looks like it should squirt water, but it's a solid design.  Lots of the oft-used controls are buttons or slides on the camera body, so you don't have to go delving through the software controls to change the aspect ratio or turn on/off the stabilisation.

It's just so Prussian, which appeals to Mrs Limey: her maiden name is Ludwig.

20767
Talk Zone / Re: Digital Cameras (non BB)
« on: December 13, 2006, 04:21:23 pm »
Quote:

The newer Exilims are pretty sweet.  They have some of the biggest LCD screens I have seen on compact cameras, and seem to be pretty highly rated.



I always thought it was pretty sweet, and still good even for a long out-dated camera.  The battery life was a real problem though so it exacerbated the cradle issue.  I presume the new models have better batteries, but you'll still need a "travel" charger.  If Mrs Limey hadn't looking for something more of a tweener, we would've got another Exilim.

20768
Talk Zone / Re: Astros trade for Jennings
« on: December 13, 2006, 01:17:05 pm »
Quote:

Never been to Denver on a stagnant summer day, huh?



Maybe it's not the weather.

20769
Talk Zone / Re: Digital Cameras (non BB)
« on: December 13, 2006, 12:21:25 pm »
Quote:

I wouldn't say ridiculous. Maybe unnecessary for typical family photos but if you find yourself cropping your photos for the best composition or shooting subjects at some distance then 10 MP is worth it. Plus, 10 MP cameras are more likely to have a better quality CCD than lower resolution cameras.



Mrs Limey's 10MP took some spectacular shots in NYC.  Nice to have a small camera that can be used for snaps, but won't let you down when something bigger presents itself.

20770
Talk Zone / Re: Digital Cameras (non BB)
« on: December 13, 2006, 12:17:42 pm »
Quote:

Great cameras can be had for far cheaper than $400.  I am partial to the Canon brand name, but I like the Casio Exilim series.  Sony makes good cameras too, but they don't use the standard SecureDigital or CompactFlash formats.



Mrs Limey's old camera was the original "does this camera make my butt look big" Exilim.  It took decent shots (2MP) but using the flash or view screen destroyed the battery.  That was the trade-off for the tiny size.

Also, the cradle charger/USB connection thing is great, until you go away from home and want to recharge - which you'll inevitably need to do because of the tiny battery.  You'd have to take the whole frikin' cradle, or buy a second charger.

The new camera - a Leica (with the built-in light meter) has a fab. charger that's simply a smallish block that plugs into the wall and has a slot for the battery in it.  No wires to trail that can get tripped over and send your camera flying.  Those whacky Germans!

20771
Talk Zone / Re: Hey Admins...
« on: December 13, 2006, 12:10:59 pm »
Quote:

Now with Firefox, the firewall, the virsu protection and my "fear of God" (not to mention restricting his rights to user instead of power user or admin, he doesn't do that any more.  He was given his own account, I don't allow him to use my account or my wife (we are admins).



Isn't it ironic that this thread started on the topic of adding a spell-checker.

20772
Talk Zone / Re: Hey Admins...
« on: December 13, 2006, 12:02:09 pm »
Quote:

One of the things I like about Firefox as is the tab browsing feature that allows you to have multiple webpages up without having multiple browsers running.  Although, I do hear that the new IE is boasting this feature now as well.



That's my favourite feature too.  It avoids the embarrassment of an emergency alt-tab upon the approach of one's boss, only for you to switch to another open web page.

I've also organised my bookmarks so that the groups I typically end up looking at in concert can all be opened in tabs with one click.

IE may now have tabs, but why bother to switch back?

20773
Talk Zone / Re: Footer's Mailbag
« on: December 13, 2006, 11:50:55 am »
Quote:

What about the Big Lebowski?  I think the movie changes with the time... Kind of like the weather...



It really pulls the board together.

20774
Talk Zone / Re: Digital Cameras (non BB)
« on: December 11, 2006, 12:25:22 pm »
The time to store the pics will be faster on any camera, but getting a faster / larger memory card will also help.  I just replaced Mrs Limey's 8-year old digital.  There's lots of options out there, but read plenty of reviews before making your mind up.

Even the tiny ones are up to 10 megapixels now.  Be careful, though, as some of the small-size/high-resolution jobbies don't come with optical stabilisation (as opposed to digital stabilisation, or none at all), which I think is a must.

20775
Talk Zone / Re: Now what happens with Clemens
« on: December 11, 2006, 11:22:10 am »
Quote:

Yes, there was a train right-of-way there. The tollway there now is a huge four-lane elevated freeway.



I have a colleague who moved out to Katy (Fry Road) in anticipation of the tollway.  It was a struggle for a while, but then they got it all the way to his neighbourhood and he was happy.  Then they extended it way past him, and opened up the ramp from the Beltway.  Now he has the privilige of paying $10 a day to sit in the same stalled traffic that he always used to.

20776
Talk Zone / Re: Now what happens with Clemens
« on: December 11, 2006, 11:19:23 am »
Quote:

We know McLane wants to win and Zito would cost less than the Pettitte/Clemens combo.



...and most likely pitch an entire season.

20777
Talk Zone / Re: Vince Young (non BB but what a CFer he would be)
« on: December 11, 2006, 09:20:58 am »
Quote:

I'm just not used to grown men acting stupid when it comes to sportsmanship. I love baseball and the common courtesy of tipping the cap at the other team for a job well done.



I thought they taught sports in schools partly for the kids to learn sportsmanship.  That part seems to have disappeared somewhat.

20778
Talk Zone / Re: "New York is Where God Wants Me"
« on: December 10, 2006, 10:03:17 pm »
Quote:

He is a vengeful God.



When I die, I expect to find Him laughing.

20779
Talk Zone / Re: "New York is Where God Wants Me"
« on: December 10, 2006, 07:18:16 pm »
In other news, God says that it's easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven.

I don't know where the dividing line between rich and not rich is, but I hope for Andy's sake that it's not between $12mm and $16mm.

20780
Talk Zone / Re: (ot) texans
« on: December 10, 2006, 07:12:15 pm »
Quote:

Oh, let's be fair.  #1 pick Mario Williams had 2 tackles and no sacks in this game.  Play.  Maker.  Game.  Changer.

He may turn in to one of the best DEs of all time; it was STILL a stupid fucking use of the #1 pick.




Arguably the dumbest thing they could've done with the #1 pick was not pick Vince.  2nd and 3rd dumbest things would've been not to pick Reggie Bush or Matt Leinart.  Congrats to the Texans on a trifecta of idiocy.

20781
Talk Zone / Re: Marquis to the Cubs - 3 year $28 million
« on: December 09, 2006, 03:33:49 pm »
It's funny, but people think a salary cap is needed to protect the owners from greedy players, when it's really needed to protect the owners from their own stupidity.  In this case, one stupid apple is costing the bunch a fortune.  It will never end until there's an IQ test required for ownership/management.

20782
Talk Zone / Re: Pettitte a Yankee
« on: December 08, 2006, 06:32:50 pm »
Quote:

Fuck it, dude.  Let's go bowling.



Tomorrow is shabbas.  Means I don't work, I don't drive a car, I don't fucking ride in a car, I don't handle money, I don't turn on the oven, and I sure as shit don't fucking roll!

20783
Talk Zone / Re: NYCU 12/07/06
« on: December 08, 2006, 01:14:24 pm »
Quote:

This all raises a question: is there even a sports editor at the Chronicle, or are these guys just left alone to publish whatever they want?



Most of this tripe is spouted via their blogs, which by definition would be outside the editor's purview.  Having said that, the print articles display a similar cavalier attitude towards truth and accuracy (and composition), so who knows.

20784
Talk Zone / Re: "Isthere anything withhis health that I need tobe aware
« on: December 08, 2006, 09:16:21 am »
Quote:

can you retype that in layman's terms for the less intelligent of us?



You may have to plant many seeds to get one plant.  You wait for it to grow, then you fuck the plant.

20785
Talk Zone / Re: Astros set to get pitcher Jon Garland from White Sox
« on: December 07, 2006, 06:15:36 pm »
Quote:

I can't imagine that Drayton cares too much about a one time loss of $3M.



You don't get to be uber-rich by leaving money on the table.  You get there by pinching every penny there is.

20786
Talk Zone / Re: Astros take Lincoln Holdzkom in Rule 5...
« on: December 07, 2006, 05:21:57 pm »
Should we rename him "Texas" Holdzkom?

20787
Talk Zone / Re: Freddy Garcia Gone
« on: December 07, 2006, 05:12:20 pm »
Quote:

I'm surprised the Phils gave up Gavin Floyd.  He was rated better than Cole Hamels and Taylor Buchholz at one time.  Floyd was going to be the next great young arm to come around in the majors.

Cole Hamels leaped frogged over him last year because Floyd got injured.  From what I saw of Hamels, if Floyd was supposed to be better, then the ChiSox made a great deal.




Is Cole Hamels some kind of subliminal advertising?

20788
Talk Zone / Re: Astros set to get pitcher Jon Garland from White Sox
« on: December 07, 2006, 05:07:01 pm »
Quote:

I understand this is a business, but I ask again "When is enough, enough?"  What can you buy with $15 Mil that you cannot with $12?  Especially after you already have ~$50 Mil in previous salary earned?
Why not play where you want to?  Shocking concept I know.




Don't forget that a slice of that $3mil you want Andy to give away goes to the Hendricks hyenas.

20789
Talk Zone / Re: Astros set to get pitcher Jon Garland from White Sox
« on: December 07, 2006, 05:04:37 pm »
Quote:

i was listening to this as well and Lance said some curious things that aren't the usual PC stuff coming out of a ballplayer.  it's the first time i've heard him on 610, so i don't know if he's always this candid.  he was talking about how he likes Carlos Lee and all, but he thought the money would have been better spent on pitching (Jason Schmidt was his example).  he did mention that he thought Pettitte was probably giong to NY and that Roger would probably go with him, which surprised me.  he also called Richard Justice the "writer of wrongs", which i don't know if that's a new tag or not, but i like it.



Berkman is a goof.  He often says things with his tongue planted firmly in (his own) cheek, but the irony gets lost in translation.  I wouldn't be surprised if his Rockitte comments were just him having a laff.  He's a goof, but he's not stupid.

20790
Talk Zone / Re: Astros set to get pitcher Jon Garland from White Sox
« on: December 07, 2006, 05:01:19 pm »
Quote:

Is there a trough around here where people can gorge themselves of lead-based paint and then post on the Internet?



Since AD went down?  Nope.

20791
Talk Zone / Re: Astros set to get pitcher Jon Garland from White Sox
« on: December 07, 2006, 04:54:04 pm »
Quote:

Sorta like preparing your sphincter for dildo insertion.  Um, not that I'd know or anything,... but, um, I can just imagine what it... um, NTTAWWT, but yeah, ya know, ok.



Don't worry folks.  I ain't YouTubin' this one.

20792
Talk Zone / Re: Astros set to get pitcher Jon Garland from White Sox
« on: December 07, 2006, 12:00:59 pm »
Quote:

Yeah but, it was nice of them to get us ready for it, dont you think?



You might think that you're ready for it.  But when it actually happens...

20793
Talk Zone / Re: Hahahahahah. Wait. Hahahahaha.
« on: December 07, 2006, 11:53:43 am »
Quote:

I'd put Barry in front of Poo Holes, but I'm sure LaGenius will figure out the optimum solution is for Barry to bat 2nd, Poo Holes 4th and the pitcher 8th.



Whatever they do, I want Wheeler pitching in every gaem against them.  High and tight fastballs all day to these two cocksuckers.

20794
Talk Zone / Re: Astros set to get pitcher Jon Garland from White Sox
« on: December 07, 2006, 11:50:51 am »
Quote:

In light of the fact that Pettitte's family is here and that the Astros have been at least as competitive as the Yankees have been over the past few years, the only reason that I can see Pettitte going back to the Yankees is the additional money.  Therefore, Fuck Pettitte.



If this happens, I will hereinafter refer to him as "Fuckitte".

Carry on.

20795
Talk Zone / Re: Astros set to get pitcher Jon Garland from White Sox
« on: December 07, 2006, 11:48:58 am »
Quote:

There was a trial balloon, Lane is slimming down and could play CF, a couple weeks ago.



Joy.

20796
Talk Zone / Re: Andy Returns
« on: December 07, 2006, 11:47:02 am »
Quote:

$12mil in a no-income-tax state like Texas is roughly the same at $15mil in New York, right?  Plus, Andy would avoid needing an expensive apartment and all those costly trips back and forth, just in case he is reading this...



He might get some of that fabled* NY endorsement money.  Do they have HEB's in New York?

From local reports, The Puerto Rican Whore is getting none of it.  Perhaps not surprising when you play for the Mets, not the Yanks, have a shit first season and then next year shit all over yourself in the at-bat that ends the play-offs for your team.

20797
Talk Zone / Re: Hahahahahah. Wait. Hahahahaha.
« on: December 07, 2006, 11:41:52 am »
Quote:

The idea of Bonds and his .400 OBP hitting in front of Poo Holes is a bit worrisome though.



You think that the way it goes?  I'm not disagreeing, but I bet there'll be a monumental sulk-off between these two to decide which one "protects" the other in the line-up.

Also, Jake games would be 4 hours long on average, when taking into account all the posing going on at home plate.

20798
Talk Zone / Re: The downside of fancy salad dressings
« on: December 06, 2006, 05:44:49 pm »
Quote:

It's likely that the property taxes on a place suitable for a multimillionaire in many big-league cities would be higher than the property taxes on Lee's ranch.



Is Royal Oaks full yet?

20799
Talk Zone / Re: NYCU 12-06
« on: December 06, 2006, 03:40:32 pm »
Quote:

"I really don't know how these things get started," said Hendricks, who upon hearing the report felt compelled to hold court in the lobby to dispute it.
The Link




Clearly, 1 year / 15 mil isn't enough, so it needs to be poo-pooed before it becomes the benchmark.

20800
Talk Zone / Re: NYCU 12-06
« on: December 06, 2006, 02:47:09 pm »
Quote:

Michael Kaye, of 1050 ESPN radio, and the television play by play announcer for the Yankees, said this morning that there is a 70% chance that Pettitte would go back to the Yankees.  He spoke about the friendship that he and Pettitte have, although he did not say that his belief was based upon any conversation he had with Andy.  Rather, it seemed to be his impression based upon the news reports that he has read.  So now we have a second level of speculation -- i.e. commentators speculating based upon the speculations of various writers.



...which will cause the original speculators to revisit their original speculation, saying that there is now a growing concensus...

20801
Talk Zone / Re: Why?? No, REALLY. Why??
« on: December 06, 2006, 02:44:42 pm »
Quote:

As long as I get royalties, I don't care who plays me in the movie.



Nathan Lane?  Paul Reubens?

20802
Talk Zone / Re: Why?? No, REALLY. Why??
« on: December 06, 2006, 11:44:51 am »
Quote:

Lugo gets $9m PER for 4 years???  Someone explain this to me.  Feel free to use any stats or facts you have.  

Total.  Lunacy.




Is it a surpsie to anyone that Lugo would end up getting 4 years?  I think the accompanying fine's a little steep though.  What did he do now?

20803
Talk Zone / Re: Why?? No, REALLY. Why??
« on: December 06, 2006, 11:40:19 am »
Quote:

With this kind of money I think it's time to dust off the spikes and see if I can get on as a non-roster invitee with oh say the Royals or Rays..  

Not that I have much talent mind you..




Maybe Marky Mark will play you in the movie of your story.

20804
Talk Zone / Re: Pujols feels he was snubbed for MVP
« on: December 05, 2006, 10:16:55 pm »
Quote:

There seems to be a lot of confusion between the concepts of misspeaking and being misunderstood these days. If you misspeak and say something you didn't mean to say, fine, but it doesn't mean that the rest of us misunderstood you.



I'm waiting for the other shoe to drop, and Albert to check himself into re-hab.

20805
Talk Zone / Re: Pujols feels he was snubbed for MVP
« on: December 05, 2006, 10:15:54 pm »
Quote:

I don't think Albert correctly understands "misunderstood".

If he was "misunderstood", then he has nothing to apologize for.




Even his apology was all about him.  What a tool!

20806
Talk Zone / Re: New Limey Time Posted (now with YouTube)
« on: December 05, 2006, 10:06:56 pm »
Quote:

In other words, imagine being an Oiler fan.



...with the added bonus of being against your most hated rival.

20807
Talk Zone / Re: New Limey Time Posted (now with YouTube)
« on: December 05, 2006, 07:30:51 pm »
Quote:

from the bbc:
Quote:

England lost nine wickets for 60 in 43 overs, with Shane Warne taking 4-49 and key batsmen playing some poor shots.




I have no idea what that means, though it doesn't sound good.



Imagine, if you can, the ridiculous scenario of losing a game when ahead by 8 runs in the 9th inning.  Then imagine doing it to the Jakes in the NLCS.  Then you'd have an idea...

I've been out of town, so no full update yet.  Not sure I'll do one now, to be honest.  I busy and pissed off!

20808
Talk Zone / Re: Bored
« on: December 01, 2006, 10:39:29 am »
Quote:

Which one is you, BudGirl?
The Link




Why are you posting a photo of Peter North surrounded by girls?  It's not like I haven't seen that before.

20809
Talk Zone / Re: Me likey
« on: November 30, 2006, 09:08:30 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

so if you werent joking, just go ahead and tell me what was so dumb about that post. id really like to hear why you think that alkie  




well ive been gone for a couple days and im not surprised this hasnt been answered




You made Alkie's head explode.  His hands are still typing, but it's just a reflex.

20810
Talk Zone / Re: Reporters are from Somewhere
« on: November 30, 2006, 12:34:12 pm »
Quote:

How about now,

from Pinwheel's most recent nocturnal emission "Memo to Uncle Drayton: you did a terrific job in signing Carlos Lee and Woody Williams. You're not finished. You need one more impact addition. It's not going to be cheap. It's necessary, though. Don't make me tell you again."




Thank the maker!  I can stop defending the prick.

20811
Talk Zone / Re: Pujols feels he was snubbed for MVP
« on: November 30, 2006, 12:30:53 pm »
Quote:

I think it's silly to confine the MVP award to a player from a playoff team. This is saying that an individual award should be given to a player based partly on the performance of his teammates. At the very least, if you want to insist that "value" only counts based on how well the team does, you'd want to consider all teams in contention, which the Phillies were.



It can be argued that a player who stands out against the league, while playing on a shit team, is probably the better player.  Hard to get the gaudy hitting stats if you are surrounded by Automatic Outs (tm).

20812
Talk Zone / Re: I Hate Winter
« on: November 30, 2006, 12:25:20 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Perhaps "Alkie's Toteboard" should become "Alkie's Dream Sequences" for the off-season.




Only if it comes with Wet-Naps.




Please tell me that you are not suggesting that we get to share Alkie's wet dreams!

20813
Talk Zone / Re: Pujols feels he was snubbed for MVP
« on: November 29, 2006, 11:41:13 pm »
Quote:

I couldn't read the story because someone's huge face popped up over it. No matter. Pooholes bitching about not getting an individual honor after winning a World Series ring just seems so...typical.



There are rumblings in the press more regularly that, instead of being a case that Everyone Loves Albert, he can actually be a bit of a shit.  I'm glad to see it, because I've been saying that from pretty much day 1.

20814
Talk Zone / Re: How to Prank a Telemarketer (Non-BB, Non-YT)
« on: November 29, 2006, 03:17:11 pm »
Quote:

I'm blocked from it here at work.  If it's the homicide detective one, that one is hillarious.



Bingo!

20815
Talk Zone / Re: Middle Relief
« on: November 29, 2006, 11:18:17 am »
Quote:

Any thoughts to bringing Dotel back?



The words "relief" and "long" don't normally inhabit my brain when thinking of Dotel.

20816
Talk Zone / How to Prank a Telemarketer (Non-BB, Non-YT)
« on: November 29, 2006, 10:58:04 am »
This is just too funny not to share.

20817
Talk Zone / Re: Purpura interview on MLB radio
« on: November 28, 2006, 09:35:40 pm »
Quote:

I'm no batting expert, but his swing has always seemed awkward and flawed to me.



Someone in here described it as if he's trying to hit himself with the bat.  That's both funny and perfect.

20818
Talk Zone / Re: Purpura interview on MLB radio
« on: November 28, 2006, 08:49:13 pm »
Quote:

It's the only thing I can think of.

I know Lane was a masher in the minors, but Jesus Christ, how many more seasons of well-below-average from him do we have to put up with?




I wish he knew how to quit him.

20819
Talk Zone / Re: So, who really believes this?
« on: November 28, 2006, 08:43:09 pm »
Quote:

I saw Lane in Costco the other day



Is it to muchg to hope that he was filling out a job application?

20820
Talk Zone / Re: Purpura interview on MLB radio
« on: November 28, 2006, 08:40:52 pm »
Quote:

Purpura has had a hard on for Lane forever.



Broke Bat Mountain?

20821
Talk Zone / Re: Reporters are from Somewhere
« on: November 28, 2006, 06:40:52 pm »
Quote:

just curious, has limey linked to any Bob Ross videos?



Not Bob Ross, no.

20822
Talk Zone / Re: Reporters are from Somewhere
« on: November 28, 2006, 06:16:44 pm »
Quote:

You other guys are missing the point here.  Limey just posted 6 straight posts without a link to youtube.  Get off his case already.



Oh lordy!

20823
Talk Zone / Re: Reporters are from Somewhere
« on: November 28, 2006, 06:10:11 pm »
Quote:

Yet Pinwheel whistles right past his use of the word "insane" in the first post.



Yes he did.  He tempered his comment to "overpaid", probably because he doesn't want Lee not talking to him before he even signs his contract.  So he's crabbing, not pinwheeling.  For once.

20824
Talk Zone / Re: Reporters are from Somewhere
« on: November 28, 2006, 06:07:24 pm »
Quote:

Its implicit. How can you talk about what is 'too much' if you aren't using value to the team or overall value as a player as a metric?



I think, in his second comment, that Justice was treating Lee as a player as a seperate issue to Lee as a payroll entry.  That's not the whole story, of course, but it's all Justice gave us.

Trying to fathom an inference or implicit meaning in his blatherings is a futile exercise.  He uses the "diarrhoea of consciousness" method.

20825
Talk Zone / Re: Reporters are from Somewhere
« on: November 28, 2006, 06:02:42 pm »
Quote:

Yes, he did (reread pravata's quote). After saying the Astros should pass on Lee at 90 mil "...ought to take a pass and find another way to improve the club."  The obvious implication is that Lee would improve the club but not for more than the O's reportedly offered.
(Emphasis mine)




Pinwheel's opinion that Lee is over-priced at 90 mil is distinct from his opinion that he makes the club better once he'd been acquired.  He's saying, "I wouldn't have paid that much, but he's going to be a big help".  I still see no inconsistency.

Lee improves the club whether he's paid $100mm or $1.00.  The next question is whether there's money left for further improvements; but that's not in play here.

20826
Talk Zone / Re: Reporters are from Somewhere
« on: November 28, 2006, 05:42:16 pm »
Quote:

Fair? Not in the mood for fair with this guy.  Consistency would have been to say that the Astros need Lee to improve and they should pay market price (and not "lowball") for him from the get go.  And, it's not "overpaying" because the Astros bid was not even the highest, Giants would have paid him more.  Lets not even consider how he moved off of "insane" as a description for the projected price.  Giving him a toe hold for future criticisms and an opening to his readers for current second guessing.  



See my response to Jacksonian.  Also, I agree that it's entirely fair to tilt at this pinwheel for what he says, but Justice's comments that you posted were so shallow and incomplete (as usual) that there's nothing really there to have at.

20827
Talk Zone / Re: Reporters are from Somewhere
« on: November 28, 2006, 05:36:16 pm »
Quote:

Not to me.  First he says the net of paying more than 90 mil and whatever Lee brings to the field is a negative, ie don't do it.  Then he says they got "way better."  For me, way better means you pay what's necessary. Justice is diarrhetic.



His initial comment never made any reference to what impact Lee would have on the team, just that 80-90 mil was too much.  The second comment reaffirms his thought that Drayton has overpaid, but adds that Lee will make the team better.

Classic Pinwheel would have an earlier comment saying that Lee isn't going to help the team enough to justify 80-90 mil.  But that's not what he said.

20828
Talk Zone / Re: Pettitte
« on: November 28, 2006, 05:22:52 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

It's a stunning reversal to go from thinking that we had heard the last of him to finding out we have  four more years of him. I am shocked.



I am sick about it.  Milo isn't even a shell of his former self.  He is approaching Harry Carey in the hanging on too long category.



Don't forget that his wife died last year (IIRC).  I suspect that any thought of him being retired by anyone other than the Grim Reaper went with her.  I have sympathy for the poor fellow in that regard, but in the unlikely event that I out-live Mrs Limey, I'm not going to phone him up and try to sell him insurance for 3 hours a day.

20829
Talk Zone / Re: Reporters are from Somewhere
« on: November 28, 2006, 03:45:06 pm »
Quote:

The problem comes down to this (among other reasons) and I've discussed it here before. Columnists and reporters should not also be writing blogs for the same publication. The lines are blurred and it creates confusion apparently, in this case, for the writer.



Punditry masquerading as journalism is epidemic.  And not just in sports.

20830
Talk Zone / Re: Reporters are from Somewhere
« on: November 28, 2006, 03:38:28 pm »
Quote:

That would be ok, I suppose, if he just stuck to one Somewhere and didn't insist we take his opinions seriously.  Here is the latest trip to Somewhere, then a detour to Elsewhere,

From the Blog
11/22
It appears to be down to the Orioles, Phillies and Astros for Carlos Lee, and the bidding has gotten insane. It's believed the Orioles have offered as much as a six-year contract worth about $80 million to $90 million, according to the Baltimore Sun. If those numbers are even close to accurate, the Astros ought to take a pass and find another way to improve the club.

11/24
Drayton McLane overpaid to get Carlos Lee, but he did get him. And because he got him, the Astros didn't just get better Friday. They got way better.

It's difficult to tell if he was either in his underpants, or inbred when he typed those two "opinions".




To be fair to pinhweel (probably a first for me), I don't see those two statements as being in conflict.  In the first comment, he opines that 80-90 mil for Lee is insane and in the second he says that Drayton improved the club whilst over-paying.

Seems to be an acorn of consistency for the blind squirrel.

20831
Talk Zone / Re: Me likey
« on: November 28, 2006, 12:52:21 pm »
Quote:

I'd like to see it in the real world. Maybe LeGenius could try it?



I know that your comment is somewhat tongue in cheek, but La Genius did start McTweet at 2B and bat him lead-off.  More than once.

20832
Talk Zone / Re: McGwire, Gwynn, Ripken Highlight HOF Ballot
« on: November 28, 2006, 12:22:17 pm »
Quote:

McGwire (evasive before Congress)...



I've seen BFiBs opine that Ronald was "caught" with Andro on purpose, to deflect attention from possible 'roid use.  Better to attribute his ridiculous bulking up to a dodgy, but at the time not banned by MLB, substance than be thought of as a juicer.

It sounds like a plausible scenario (the sort of thing an agent would come up with) except that I don't think he was in danger of being outed as a juicer at the time.  Everyone was diggin' the long ball, so whether he was cheating or not wasn't an issue.

20833
Talk Zone / Re: Me likey
« on: November 28, 2006, 09:14:15 am »
Quote:

Money, the real world, and the fact that baseball players are carbon based lifeforms and not robots are irrelevant.



I believe Lee is a lard-based lifeform.

20834
Talk Zone / Re: Astros in HD?
« on: November 27, 2006, 04:43:01 pm »
Quote:

How much bigger is the hard drive on the Time Warner HD DVR box? And you say it doesn't count any more than the standard DVR box?

I intend to go the HD route after the first of the year,




I have an HD DVR from Time Warner.  I've never filled it, even though the HD shows must be huge files to store.  It does default to auto-erase a recording after 14 days which helps keep things a little cleaner, but you can change that to a shorter erase time, longer or never (customisable per show).

I had shit-loads of HD soccer matches on there during the World Cup, and it never complained.

20835
Talk Zone / Re: The Ranch
« on: November 27, 2006, 02:18:32 pm »
Quote:

Aren't cricket players smart enough to wear a cup? Jeez, they have those huge pads on the shins, you'd think they'd get a bit of armor where its needed.



They wear a cup (called a "box"), but it moves upwards when hit from underneath by a ball...

20836
Talk Zone / Re: New Limey Time Posted (now with YouTube)
« on: November 27, 2006, 02:16:14 pm »
Quote:

Does "biennial" mean something different in British English than it does in American English or does it merely benefit from trans-hemispherical flexibility?



Nope, same.  It's just that cricket is played in summer so it's a short two years when going from the northern to the southern hemisphere, and a long two years coming back.

20837
Talk Zone / Re: The Ranch
« on: November 27, 2006, 01:19:31 pm »
Quote:

does Kim Basinger own an island off the Georgia coast?

- Pete Schewedy & his balls




did someone say balls?

20838
Talk Zone / Re: It's That Time of Year (Non-BB)
« on: November 27, 2006, 01:14:03 pm »
Quote:

Cute.  But still waiting for that  first test summary,



Already posted.  Link stickied at the top of the page.

20839
Talk Zone / New Limey Time Posted (now with YouTube)
« on: November 27, 2006, 12:46:13 pm »
Hold on a second!  Before you go rushing over there, be warned that it's about cricket.  I had ones of requests to provide game summaries again, so there you have it.

The uninitiated might want to peruse the 2005 Ashes series post first, as there's a lot more explanation in that one.

20840
Talk Zone / Re: Me likey
« on: November 27, 2006, 09:20:24 am »
Quote:

well i see you edited so ill forget what i was gonna say to dispute your logic there. and im not gonna cut you down like i know you would do to me if i made such a mistake.



Does your keyboard get sticky with all that drool under the keys?  The apostrophe seems particularly afflicted.

How sweet.

20841
Talk Zone / Re: Pettitte
« on: November 26, 2006, 09:30:15 pm »
Quote:

In that case, can Lee's nickname be Brenham, even if his ranch is somewhere down near Wharton?



Brenham seems appropriate: it's where the ice cream comes from.  That, or Chappel Hill...

20842
Talk Zone / Re: the rest of the off season
« on: November 25, 2006, 06:23:19 pm »
Quote:

I agree with this in part.  But what sets fuel at $2.50 now is what people are willing to pay for what is available now and you can't ignore that people's willingness to pay is determined by underlying economic rationale.



Fuel is a bad example here, as its demand is driven heavily by there being no immediate alternative (other than car-pooling).  A better example of might be something like a high-def DVD player.  Most people already have a DVD player, but there are two new formats that play in high def: HD-DVD and Blu-Ray.  Blu-Ray claims to be better and has certain exclusive content, but HD-DVD players are significantly cheaper while offering very similar picture quality.  Guess which ones are selling better?  (See Max, Beta).

20843
Talk Zone / Re: Astros in HD?
« on: November 24, 2006, 04:35:28 pm »
Quote:

Available bandwidth also affects the number of HD channels.  Keep in mind that both satellite providers have far less bandwidth to work with than cable or OTA.  DirecTV has increased compression so they can provide more channels, and DISH will eventually do this too.  For now, DirecTV has more available bandwidth for channels and DISH's offerings look better.



What's all this bandwahoosie nonsense.  We all know that TV is a series of tubes and if someone dumps a whole bunch of stuff on it the one of your internets will get stuck in line.

20844
Talk Zone / Re: Astros in HD?
« on: November 24, 2006, 02:44:04 pm »
Quote:

So what is the monthly cost? I'm thinking of going that route but not sure if I can justify in my fugal mind $100 plus a month to watch a fancier TV picture.



Assuming you have an HD-capable telly, it costs $5/month to upgrade to HD (plus the converter box rental if you don't currently rent...about $3-4 IIRC).  The DVR is an additional $5/month.

Think of the monthly cost in real-world terms: that's three beers in an ice house or two pints in a pseudo-English/Irish pub or one beer at MMPUS.

20845
Talk Zone / BINGO!!!
« on: November 22, 2006, 10:54:14 pm »
Quote:

Quote:


BTW: Grapevine Market in Austin has a shitload of the Shiner 97.  I bought a case based on yours and the other beer snobs' comments.




Gracias.  I was in Central Market this morning on the annual Thanksgiving load-'er-up trip and didn't see any there.  I'll stop by Grapevine on the way home.




Scored some 97 and some Dunkleweizen.  Haven't yet tried the latter.

20846
Talk Zone / Re: What the hell is in LA's water?
« on: November 22, 2006, 05:41:15 pm »
Quote:

The other five, the Marlins, Devil Rays, Twins, Royals and Athletics have had their existence threatened.



Don't the Twins have referendum approval for public financing of a new park?  I seem to remember something about that from earlier this year.

20847
Talk Zone / Don't you mean with the Braves?
« on: November 22, 2006, 05:05:36 pm »
nm

20848
Talk Zone / Re: What the hell is in LA's water?
« on: November 22, 2006, 05:04:35 pm »
Quote:

I have read speculation that Google was going to buy TiVo and start delivering the same personalized ads on television shows (obviously quite a few years away).

That would be scary good advertising.




At least that way, while it'll still see the same ads repeated ad nauseam, it'd be for stuff I might like rather than Bud and  Chevies.

20849
Talk Zone / Re: We need a Friday beer thread
« on: November 22, 2006, 02:54:26 pm »
Quote:

Quote:


BTW: Grapevine Market in Austin has a shitload of the Shiner 97.  I bought a case based on yours and the other beer snobs' comments.




Gracias.  I was in Central Market this morning on the annual Thanksgiving load-'er-up trip and didn't see any there.  I'll stop by Grapevine on the way home.




You've both just ensured yourselves a happy Thanksgiving.

20850
Talk Zone / Re: It's That Time of Year (Non-BB)
« on: November 22, 2006, 02:17:11 pm »
Quote:

He ran up a score of 216 today before being caught out ... his ninth double century.  The writer's sobriquet of  batting genius is no hyberbole.  The Windies have the Pakis on the ropes.



Can't think about that now.  The Ashes kicks off tonight.  The Barmy Army will be in full song...

(To the tune of "Yellow Submarine")
In the town where I was born, there lived a man who was a thief
And he told me of his life, stealing bread and shagging sheep.
So they put him in the nick, and then a magistrate he went to see
He said "put him on a ship, to the convict colony"
You all live in a convict colony, a convict colony, a convict colony
You all live in a convict colony, a convict colony, a convict colony

20851
Talk Zone / Re: We need a Friday beer thread
« on: November 22, 2006, 01:43:51 pm »
Quote:

Sam Adam's chief attribute is that it's offered in just about every restaurant on the planet. If my choices are Bud, Coors, Miller and Sam Adams, well you can guess which one I'm choosing.



Gibson with Tito's, or Grey Goose if you don't have it.

20852
Talk Zone / Re: We need a Friday beer thread
« on: November 22, 2006, 01:28:11 pm »
Quote:

Sam Adams is the worst offender of the brew poseurs.  They are basically Budweiser in a fancy bottle.  Undrinkable.  How Sam Adams has managed to swindle beer drinkers all these years should be required reading in American Salesmanship 101.



If you go to Boston, you won't find anyone drinking Sam Adams.  See also Fosters, Australia; Carlsberg, Denmark; Watney's Red Barrel, England.

20853
Talk Zone / Re: We need a Friday beer thread
« on: November 22, 2006, 01:26:33 pm »
Quote:

I never got Sierra Nevada's line.  Their barleywine is among the worst on Earth and their more "popular" stuff just never struck me as that good.



The pub I used to work in was a pretty down-market place.  The signature drink was a "bitter and gold", which was half a pint of ale in a pint glass with a bottle of barley wine ("Gold Top").  Cheaper than a pint of bitter but packing more punch.

20854
Talk Zone / Re: We need a Friday beer thread
« on: November 22, 2006, 01:23:19 pm »
Quote:

Oh please.  Sierra Nevada is the second most over-rated swallow defiant piss ever produced.  Right after Fat Tire.  Let's face it...if it's brewed in the US anywhere but Shiner, TX, it's crap.



FSN's terribly disappointing "Spotlight" on Bagwell did throw up one interesting tid-bit.  Baggy and Kile used to take Shiners* when fishing.

* Unless a shiner is some type of luuuuure, in which case move along.

20855
Talk Zone / Re: Astros in HD?
« on: November 22, 2006, 01:17:46 pm »
Quote:

I'm in Houston. I'm just learning about HD, so I have no idea.



CBS has some crappy-arsed HD.  I think they go for the lowest pixel count that can still be called high-def.  Most of the other HD channels are pretty sweet.

TimeWarner has some stealth HD channels, so check their website for the full list.  There's even a TNT HD for Van Damage re-runs and NBA.  If you subscribe to HBO and/or Showtime, you automotically get the HD feed of their main east and west coast channels (460/461 for HBO and 470/471 for S/T).

You have to pay extra to get ESPN HD (which I vowed never to get because I wasn't going to pay those tossers any more money and then they started carrying Astros playoff games in 2005 and so I was going to sign up for October and then cancel but I never cancelled and fuck!), but you also get INHD1 & 2 thrown in, which are completely random channels that can bail you out on a slow TV night.

20856
Talk Zone / Re: What the hell is in LA's water?
« on: November 22, 2006, 01:04:46 pm »
Quote:

You're kind of right - the first step, though, was becoming the premier search engine. It wasn't until they accomplished that that they also figured out the best way to monetize that accomplishment.



The also have the advantage of their name being the generic term for what they do.  Like Hoover and TiVo (and Coke).

20857
Talk Zone / Re: What the hell is in LA's water?
« on: November 22, 2006, 12:57:33 pm »
Quote:

...that's what happens in a world where Google is trading at $500.  For advertisements.  The company HAS NO PRODUCT PEOPLE!



Google has no product, and they just bought YouTube for $1.65bn.  That's a whole lot of nothing.

20858
Talk Zone / Re: What the hell is in LA's water?
« on: November 22, 2006, 12:55:34 pm »
Quote:

Deny it if you want.  It is the single greatest advertising tool in the history of earth.  

Instead of spending tens of thousands of dollars force feeding your brand to EVERYONE, you spend less than a buck feeding your brand (and website) to someone looking for exactly what you sell.

The first 10 months of business, I set my Google Ads budget at $60/mo.  And we were doing 8-10x the business we had anticipated; revenue wise.  

Three months ago, I ran a targeted ad in 2 trade journals that go out to the folks we're trying to get to hire us...$720/mo...literally ZERO clients.  

Tell me that isn't magic.




You put your photo in the press ad, right?

20859
Talk Zone / Re: What the hell is in LA's water?
« on: November 22, 2006, 12:53:55 pm »
Quote:

sunsabitches.... The Link (click through the print option) that's what happens in a world where Google is trading at $500.  For advertisements.  The company HAS NO PRODUCT PEOPLE!



"OAFs".  That's good.

20860
Talk Zone / Re: It's That Time of Year (Non-BB)
« on: November 21, 2006, 06:22:28 pm »
FTR, the 1st test starts at 6pm CST on Wednesday, which is Thursday morning in Australia.  The game isn't on TV anywhere, but you can stream the wonderful BBC radio commentary from their website.

Here's some of the fun you may experience.

20861
Talk Zone / Re: We need a Friday beer thread
« on: November 21, 2006, 06:16:29 pm »
Quote:

Is it ever too early to have a beer thread?

And on that note, is anyone else enjoying Shiner 97 as much as I am??




I was enjoying it, until Kroger sold out.  Fuckers.

Shiner claims it to be their darkest beer.  It has a light (not to be confused with lite) beginning with the solid finish of a heavy beer.  I might have to swing by Spec's on the way home...

20862
Talk Zone / Re: Reasons To Be Cheerful, Pt. 1 (non-bb, non-sports, non-n
« on: November 21, 2006, 05:07:06 pm »
Quote:

You know, I may be in the minority here, but I find Nancy Grace inexplicably attractive, in a "I want to have very angry sex with you" kind of way.



I think I'd rather bone Geraldo.

20863
Talk Zone / Re: Let's get serious about speculating
« on: November 21, 2006, 12:57:07 pm »
Quote:

Perhaps we could have Jeff's grafted onto Manny's body.  The Jeff head would be in charge of baseball things, and Manny could still be available for interviews and hunting out imaginary racists.



You wouldn't need all of Manny's bod.  Just the shoulder.  And let's face it, Baggy could probably take my shoulder and be just fine.

20864
Talk Zone / Re: It's That Time of Year (Non-BB)
« on: November 21, 2006, 12:53:07 pm »
Quote:

Is Viv Richards still playing?



Sadly, the mighty bat of Sir Isaac Vivian Alexander Richards has been retired.

20865
Talk Zone / Re: It's That Time of Year (Non-BB)
« on: November 21, 2006, 12:44:11 pm »
Quote:

I'm looking forward to your review again this year, though with decidedly different hopes and expectations (having been introduced to the greatness of the game in Sydney).  For the uninitiated, just think 'five days straight of baseball'.  And in this game, it is the batsmen who are on defense!

On a related note, Brian Lara is on 196 unbeaten against Pakistan and seems sure to get his double century tomorrow.




Perhaps I'll do a test-by-test summary this time around.  Just to irritate the philistines here.

Brian Lara is something special.  In 2004 he pounded England for 400 runs not out.  I don't know what parallel you could draw for that with baseball...maybe going 5 for 5, all homers, but I'm not sure that does it justice.

20866
Talk Zone / Re: It's That Time of Year (Non-BB)
« on: November 21, 2006, 12:08:38 pm »
Quote:

Ashes Cricket???

I have heard of burning roaches, but crickets?  I guess that chirping can get annoying after a while.

I remember this one year when I pulled into a gas station at night and it was like a sea of crickets, it was pretty creepy.




It's pure entertainment.

20867
Talk Zone / Re: It's That Time of Year (Non-BB)
« on: November 21, 2006, 11:36:36 am »
Quote:

Which, by the way, is the proper amount of press this should be given.  Don't you know anyone else here in Houston who speaks your language?  Maybe a nice Englishman who has a youtube addiction?



Well, as it's occurring down under, I thought that NBC might give it the Olypic treatment, and tape delay it for 37 hours.

20868
Talk Zone / It's That Time of Year (Non-BB)
« on: November 21, 2006, 11:09:19 am »
Thanksgiving?  Nope.  Ashes Cricket!!!!

After the incredible drama of Summer 2005, when the heavily unfavoured England took back The Ahes from the hated Australia, the two sides lock up again, this time down under, to do it all over again.  England haven't won in Australia for over 20 years, but they hadn't beaten them in England for nearly 20 years before 2005 either.  The Aussie team remains as strong as ever while England have stumbled trough the intervening months.

For an in-depth review of the 2005 series, check out the Limey Time on the subject.  For this year's tests, check your local TV listings to find no mention of them at all.

20869
Talk Zone / Re: Soriano, A Cub. Fuck.
« on: November 20, 2006, 11:06:42 am »
Quote:

Spending other people's money  Link



"There are lots of people in Chicago who are interested in the Cubs. It's largely psychological and somewhat financial."

I would've used "pathological" myself.

20870
Talk Zone / Re: Geez
« on: November 18, 2006, 08:06:58 pm »
Quote:

Or not.

I don't mean he won't link to youtube, I mean it won't be the least bit appropriate.




Like this?

20871
Talk Zone / Re: Geez
« on: November 17, 2006, 05:32:49 pm »
Quote:

About 20 years ago a Boom Operator on a KC135 got his friend to fly for him on a local mission. While the plane was doing touch and goes, it crashed. Part of the aircrafts engine, I believe, landed in the parking lot of the squadron killing the crew member who was supposed to fly that day.



And I think I'm getting fucked over when I let someone into traffic who then screws me up so I miss the next light.

20872
Talk Zone / Re: into the plum brandy in Boston
« on: November 17, 2006, 05:24:59 pm »
Quote:

Cafardo reminds me of some dude sitting behind his computer wearing a Nomar jersy and a Sox hat on backwards tilted to the right.



If the BoSox want to pay Clemens $20+mm for 60 innings of work, then why stop them?

20873
Talk Zone / Re: Purpura makes free-agent offers
« on: November 17, 2006, 11:27:23 am »
Quote:

I still just can't shake the fact that Lee and Soriano aren't the answer.  No matter what Schlum says.



Lee's reported weight issues really concern me.  If's he prepared to let himself go in a walk year, then what's he going to do once he's made countless generations of Lees to come financially secure?

Soriano strikes me as a prima donna, and I worry that there is no longer a strong positive presence in the Astros' clubhouse to cure him of his prickitude, or at least suppress it while he's here (a bit like Dexter: have him channel his evil tendencies for good).

Meanwhile, the pitching needs some cash to fill in some rather large holes.  I know where I'd spend mine.

20874
Talk Zone / Re: Purpura makes free-agent offers
« on: November 17, 2006, 11:12:06 am »
Quote:

pitching uber alles



Even the MTV generation, with their short...ummm...what?

Anyway, the recent Astros seasons have shown that pitching is the key.  Even with horrendous offensive struggles in 2006, they came within a game of chasing down the Champs.

Contrast 2000, when the club could mash but couldn't pitch, they were done by the ASB.

20875
Talk Zone / Re: pssst! hey, how much for the 3b?
« on: November 17, 2006, 10:51:14 am »
Quote:

Wow. This got me to actually look at Ensberg's career stats - check out 2003 v. 2006. The games played, ABs, runs, doubles, homers, and RBI are damn near identical. Bizarre. Then you look at walks, Ks, average, on-base pct, and slugging pct, and they are just as wildly, tragically different as you would expect, given how much his approach has shifted since that breakout partial season. What a weird evolution as a player...



Ensberg is a different player from year to year, month to month, week to week, day to day and at-bat to at-bat.

20876
Talk Zone / Re: RedSox Insanity Question
« on: November 16, 2006, 06:38:52 pm »
Quote:

"I'm going to first assume that this whole process is done in good faith," Boras said.



Thanks for that.

20877
Talk Zone / Re: AAAAARGGGH!
« on: November 16, 2006, 06:34:32 pm »
Quote:

Richard Hidalgo? Oh wait, that was someone else.

Thanks Gerry.




That was worse: he protected Derek Bell over Abreu.  Hidalgo actually got a hit after that decision was made.

20878
Talk Zone / Re: AAAAARGGGH!
« on: November 16, 2006, 06:28:43 pm »
To rub further salt in the wounds, who was the scrub protected in from the 1995 Rule 5 draft that exposed Santana?

20879
Talk Zone / Re: RedSox Insanity Question
« on: November 16, 2006, 06:22:36 pm »
Quote:

Selig has always been able to do anything, regarding any trade, if it's in "the best interest of baseball".



See roof, retractable.

20880
Talk Zone / Re: RedSox Insanity Question
« on: November 16, 2006, 06:21:13 pm »
Quote:

Also, the deal is usually worked out between player and new team first.  In the case at hand it is sort of a contingent transfer fee ... contingent on the Red Sox working out a deal with whatshisname.



"Name" players will be allowed to do this, but Joe Schmoccer gets to take his new assignment and lump it.  As I said before, he gets a piece of the transfer fee, so unless Chelsea are going to pay him $150,000 a week, he's better off collecting 10% of as many transfers as he can get.

20881
Talk Zone / Re: RedSox Insanity Question
« on: November 16, 2006, 12:20:09 pm »
Quote:

For those Euro-types that hang about here, is this how transfers in Non-American football work? Are the transfer fees refundable? How much leverage does a player have to refuse to play for a team that he's transfered to?



I think a player can refuse a transfer, but this rarely happens (or happens before the deal is struck so it doesn't become public).  The transactions are almost always for cash and the player gets 10-15% of the transfer fee, hence the rarity of a refusal.

Wayne Rooney, for example was transferred from Everton to the MU Rowdies for about $60mm, so he pocketed somewhere between $6mm and $9mm for his trouble.  He also gets paid about $5mm a year.

20882
Talk Zone / Re: Peavy Speculation
« on: November 16, 2006, 11:03:53 am »
Quote:

How about "paranoid"?



You're not paranoid if they actually are out to get you.

20883
Talk Zone / Re: Peavy Speculation
« on: November 16, 2006, 10:55:55 am »
Quote:

In all fairness, it was in response to a question about what it would take to land Peavy in a trade AND you were recently discussed as the back of the rotation starter the Astros were likely to use next season.  Give him at least 1 more post before any conclusions are made.  All I know is I won't read thru 10 pages of that again before finding the handy-dandy ignore feature.



I have my own ignore feqature, it's called a scroll wheel.  It's easy to whizz past someone's stupidity, but you still get to see the quote and ass-kick from one or more of the popes later in the thread.

OCD requires me to scroll through each and every thread.  At least once.

20884
Talk Zone / Re: From the same article...
« on: November 16, 2006, 10:52:10 am »
Quote:

Yeah but, I don't use it very often; for obvious reasons.



Searching...searching...searching...no entries found.

20885
Talk Zone / Re: dammit, Noe
« on: November 15, 2006, 07:35:37 pm »
Quote:

...anyone want to actually talk about Jason Jennings?



Isn't he married to that Canadian bint on The Daily Show?

20886
Archive / Re: Jason Jennings anyone?
« on: November 15, 2006, 01:30:41 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Last I heard JimR trusted his stuff better than Wandy.

And Albers is likely ahead of Wandy after his meltdown this year too.





Most mammals are likely ahead of Wandy.




This is all predicated on the very bold assumption that Wandy has stuff that is trustworthy.

20887
Talk Zone / Re: From the same article...
« on: November 14, 2006, 03:40:36 pm »
Quote:

Damn you know more about what I did than I do.



pravata has a super-google that can also search your brain.

20888
Talk Zone / Re: What Brings You Here?
« on: November 14, 2006, 02:57:42 pm »
Quote:

Turns out one of my college roommates is one of his drinking budies.



...and now my neighbour, which allows for drinking without driving but increases the occurrences of public intoxication (walking home at 3am).  I think the rest of the neighbourhood hates us.

20889
Talk Zone / Re: Pence...
« on: November 14, 2006, 11:45:06 am »
Quote:

But is wreckless the same as reckless?



Wreckless means getting home without hitting anything.

20890
Talk Zone / Re: What Brings You Here?
« on: November 14, 2006, 11:13:35 am »
From the July 9, 2002 Limey Time, which was a farewell to the old site.

"I think I discovered the BFT in the '98 season. I'd become an avid 610 listener, as this was the only place where I could hear discussions about the stuff I liked. AstrosConnection was referenced by one of the on-air types, and I surfed my way over here. Like you, I was instantly hooked. Not only did it offer entertainment, news and views with a style that tickled my funny bone, but the TZ at last gave me an outlet for me desire to talk about all things Astro - and not work while looking busy."

20891
Talk Zone / Re: Bagwell files for free agency
« on: November 13, 2006, 06:42:06 pm »
Quote:

Do you actually do any work, or do you just look at YouTube all day?



You ain't the boss of me.

20892
Talk Zone / Re: Bagwell files for free agency
« on: November 13, 2006, 06:12:47 pm »
Quote:

If one has tea parties with the same imaginary people exclusively, does that make one's opinions inbred?



Did someone say tea partay?

20893
Talk Zone / Re: HanRam beats Johnson, Uggla.
« on: November 13, 2006, 03:55:27 pm »
You said "HanRam beats Johnson".

20894
Talk Zone / Re: JD a FA
« on: November 10, 2006, 05:53:01 pm »
Quote:

That indeed is Matt Harrington, but Boras was not his agent, at least not then.  It was Tommy Tanzer.  Harrington was the first overall pick in the 2000 draft, and demanded a signing bonus of $4.9 million.  The Rockies offered $4 million and a guaranteed Major League callup, Harrington turned them down.  He was drafted again in 2001 by the Padres and demanded $2.5 million.  The Pads offered him $1.2 million.  He turned that down, and went back into the draft in 2002, where he was selected in the Devil Rays in the 13th round.  They offered $200,000, and he turned that down.  By this time Harrington had fired Tanzer and replaced him with Boras.  In 2003, he was selected in the 24th round by the Reds who did not offer him a signing bonus.  He, of course, turned that down.  In 2004 he was selected in the 39th round by the Yankees, but they refused to offer him a contract even.  He went undrafted in 2005, finally becoming a free agent, which he sought to be all along.  No team would sign him in 2005, and he went undrafted again in 2006.  He finally signed a few weeks ago with the Cubs as an undrafted free agent for the minor league minimum, with no signing bonus.  He is without a doubt, the single most self-wasted potential in Major League history.



No one has ever kicked opportunity so squarely in the bollix since The Commitments.

20895
Talk Zone / Re: Hey Limey----
« on: November 10, 2006, 05:45:06 pm »
Quote:

Mah spoon is too big.



I am a banana!

20896
Talk Zone / Re: Hey Limey----
« on: November 10, 2006, 01:18:32 pm »

20897
Talk Zone / Re: Hey Limey----
« on: November 10, 2006, 01:07:04 pm »
Quote:

how  stupid are some Brits?



Any suggestion that alcohol was involved?

20898
Talk Zone / Re: A pitcher or a player as the manager?
« on: November 10, 2006, 12:40:43 pm »
Quote:

?One of the things that will be a challenge for Bud,? said Larry Dierker, the former pitcher who managed the Houston Astros from 1997 to 2001, ?is to try to get the hitters to believe that he knows what he's doing as far as putting some lineups down and putting some plays on that score runs." (a problem that Dierker never solved)



See Truby, Chris.

One could also argue that Dierker wasn't the best at managing his pen once the Starter-to-Dotel-to-Wagner ploy got busted.

20899
Talk Zone / Re: what is in a name-yours
« on: November 10, 2006, 12:38:24 pm »
Quote:

Whiskers O'Kelly is that old man in the trench coat who stumbles across a couple having at it in the park and then rubs one out watching them.



So it's not just a fake name then.

20900
Talk Zone / Re: USA Today: Five trades we'd make
« on: November 10, 2006, 12:00:32 pm »
Quote:

(Pirates) Second baseman Jose Castillo was not in the starting lineup Monday against the St. Louis Cardinals, mostly because manager Jim Tracy thought Castillo needed a rest after starting 19 of the first 20 games. Tracy said he noticed in Houston that Castillo had started taking "elongated swings," but he insisted that was not the reason Castillo was out of the lineup. Tracy said he saw Castillo trying to reach the Astros' porch in short left field "way too often" in that three-game series.

"He just needs to realize that you can't allow the environment to change your approach," Tracy said.
The Link

See also, Hidalgo, Richard




Exactly!

I actually think it's easier for lefties to swing for the CBs.  Much easier to wait on a pitch and loft/slice it that way, than try and get started early to loft/pull a pitch.  Jim Fucking Edmonds does it all the time.

Righty power hitters tend to bang 'em off the limestone above the CBs.  Only Biggio seems to have the necessary combination of short swing and good-enough pop to consistently use them.  An elongated swing will not help you drop one into Row A of the short porch.

20901
Talk Zone / Re: what is in a name-yours
« on: November 10, 2006, 11:47:29 am »
Quote:

Porn name is Whiskers O'Kelly.



Probably not a favourite with your co-stars.

20902
Talk Zone / Re: USA Today: Five trades we'd make
« on: November 10, 2006, 11:44:14 am »
Quote:

The right-handed Wells could take advantage of the short left-field porch at Minute Maid Park



I know I'm nit-picking, and this is a bit of a worn out old gripe (but the media keep repeating the same old shit): if the Crawfish Boxes are so easy to hit into (1) why do you need power to do it; and (2) why isn't every game a MMPUS a softball game?

Arrrrgh!

20903
Talk Zone / Re: Chicago doubts lure of ranch
« on: November 10, 2006, 11:40:33 am »
Quote:

Lets see, we've mentioned proximity to large tracts of land, revenge fantasies, moldy ballparks, tasty condiments, like minded teammates and an opportunity to use their skills...nope, I got nothin.



Rub girls.

20904
Talk Zone / Re: Chicago doubts lure of ranch
« on: November 10, 2006, 11:26:27 am »
Quote:

I may be naive enough to think that players base their decisions on where to play on the organization and the team and the best fit for their temperament and skills.



There's a parameter missing here.  Can't quite seem to put my finger on it...

20905
Talk Zone / Re: JD a FA
« on: November 10, 2006, 11:14:13 am »
Quote:

I've always tried to hold my fire on Drew, aware as I am of my perhaps irrational disdain for him ever since, early on in his career, he seemed to be advocating celibacy as a viable lifestyle choice.



You don't get to third base sitting on the trainer's table.

20906
Talk Zone / Re: JD a FA
« on: November 10, 2006, 11:12:38 am »
Quote:

Correction, certain players get paid at certain times.  Ask Millwood how well his FA situations worked out prior to the Rangers.  I wouldn't call his previous contracts "overpaid paid".  True, players like Beltran and A-Rod set the standard.  Most fail to live up to the hype or contacts of either of those two.



Wasn't there a kid (pitcher, IIRC) who Boras advised to eschew the draft and go to college because the bonus being offered wasn't enough, then the kid blew out his arm and never got a cent.

Obviously this is anecdotal, but it would be interesting to see whether Boras' spectacular contracts are evenly balanced with spectacular disasters.

20907
Talk Zone / Re: JD a FA
« on: November 10, 2006, 09:15:56 am »
Quote:

It's difficult to identify a part of Drew's body that has not been injured in his 20s. Does that look to improve with age?

It's closer to the truth to say that he missed part of '05 for the same reasons Bagwell did and Everett did. He had to get his shoulder cleaned out too.

And before that it's been his wrist, his ankle, his back, his neck, his ribs, his quads, his hammies, etc., etc.




I also think he has spinal and testicular deficiences.

20908
Talk Zone / Re: Golden Sombrero...Meet YouTube
« on: November 09, 2006, 06:42:40 pm »
Quote:

Even funnier in other languages. Schwanzus Longus



I saw that one.  Schwanzus Longus is funny just on its own.

20909
Talk Zone / Golden Sombrero...Meet YouTube
« on: November 09, 2006, 05:46:32 pm »
If it's on video, it's on YouTube.

20910
Talk Zone / What Did I Miss?
« on: November 09, 2006, 12:16:49 pm »
It appears that I lit the fuse and then went down the pub.  Sorry about that.

20911
Talk Zone / Re: Chicago doubts lure of ranch
« on: November 09, 2006, 12:15:12 pm »
Quote:

I don't agree that his numbers at Wrigley will be any more of a draw than his ranch, but I think the ranch thing is total hooey.  If everyone just played close to home, San Diego or Arizona would win the WS every year and no one would play in Boston or Detroit.



I'm still amazed that anyone would play in Boston or Detroit anyway.  And Philly.

20912
Talk Zone / Re: Not a Bagwell historical perspective.........
« on: November 08, 2006, 02:58:34 pm »
Quote:

I didn't say anything to Ewing, he just walked by like he was late for the movie.



I feel sorry for whoever was sitting behind him.

20913
Talk Zone / Re: Anyone surprised? (totally non-bb void filling crap)
« on: November 08, 2006, 02:50:23 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Britney Spears told husband of two years Kevin Federline that she was divorcing him via a text message while he was recording a TV interview... The wannabe rapper, 27, was filming a segment for MuchMusic in Canada at the time. He interrupted the interview and stormed off, returning 30 minutes later visibly upset.




The Link




Coming soon to a YouTube near you.

20914
Talk Zone / Re: I'm a Celebrity, Let Me In Here! (Non-BB)
« on: November 08, 2006, 02:11:45 pm »
Quote:

So when this fails miserably, can America rid the country of soccer once and for all?



It's possible but, regardless, you will be stuck with the Beckhams.

20915
Talk Zone / Re: Not a Bagwell historical perspective.........
« on: November 08, 2006, 02:07:26 pm »
Quote:

I saw Patrick Ewing at the Edwards cinema on Wesylyn (sp.?) once.



I was once booted from my table a "Spy", to make way for Michael Jordon and Charles Berkley.  Never got to see them, though, as they were surrounded by security and jock sniffers.  And chicks.

20916
Talk Zone / I'm a Celebrity, Let Me In Here! (Non-BB)
« on: November 08, 2006, 01:59:53 pm »
From today's Guardian Fiver e-mail:

The Americans have tried almost everything to turn the masses on to soccer and away from their usual hobbies of eating, mullet-growing, eating and failing to comprehend irony. They set up the NASL, for example, and roped in crowd-pulling legends like Pele, George Best, Johan Cruyff and Ron Futcher. They've allowed pony-tailed preeners to top and tail the 1994 World Cup with laughable missed penalties. None of that really worked, however, so now they are going to play their trump card: David Beckham.

Beckham's contract at Real Madrid expires at the end of the season, and Major League Soccer flunkies are currently doing the math to see if bringing him to America would be financially justified: for him to be signed, they would have to alter their salary-cap rules, as at the moment no team can spend more than $1.9m per season on salary (insert your own that-wouldn't-cover-one-shanked-free-kick-from-Goldenswingers joke here. Please).

"This is a marketing opportunity," no-$hit-Sherlocked the MLS commissioner Don Garber, before offering his opinions on what bears do in woods. "We're doing analysis and we should complete that in the next 30 days," garbled Garber, leering needily at a nearby abacus. "Beckham is a cultural world icon - and if we can get him in this league, people will care and they'll come out and see our games. If we could have him here we think it would be terrific."

It would also be terrific for Beckham, who wouldn't have to rack up such monstrous phone bills chatting to Tom and Katie, and who could finally prioritise his first love, celebrity, over his second, football. "This is a guy who was one of the better players on the English national team during the World Cup," concluded Garber, efficiently shredding the smidgen of credibility he had, "so he is a player we think is very strong." Which is more than can be said for Beckham's career prospects, clearly.

20917
Talk Zone / Re: Not a Bagwell historical perspective.........
« on: November 08, 2006, 12:47:54 pm »
Quote:

ETA: By the way, one of my good friend's wife used to do Bagwell's girlfriend's hair at some upscale salon in Galleria.  The friend's wife said this bitch used to come in and brag about Bagwell and all the things he bought her and was a general pain in the ass who didn't tip for shit.



Seems that Jeff has some problems in picking out a mate.

20918
Talk Zone / Re: what is in a name-yours
« on: November 08, 2006, 12:13:51 pm »
Quote:

Bowie is my current dog.



Named after David, no doubt.

20919
Talk Zone / Re: what is in a name-yours
« on: November 08, 2006, 11:46:21 am »
Quote:

The Reds' new pitching coach's parents took it to another level:

 Reds Hire Dick Pole




Why, for the life of me, do people called "Richard" abbreviate their name to "Dick"?  If your last name is "Pole" or, like my grandfather "Ball", the question is even more valid.

The only way this could be worse is if his name was "Hole".

20920
Talk Zone / Re: Not a Bagwell historical perspective.........
« on: November 08, 2006, 11:39:44 am »
I once sat next to Bagwell at Carraba's (without getting food poisoning, but that's another story).  I spotted him as soon as Mrs Limey and I walked through the door, and the table next to him was just leaving.  "I'll sit there if I may", I told the hostess and we were shown to that table.

As we passed the people just leaving that table I thanked them for it.  "Why?" said the man, puzzled.  He clearly had no idea who was just at the next table.

We didn't bother him at all.  He was dining with a man who I recognised but could not place (not anyone with the Astros, probably not a player, perhaps an old buddy working for the visiting team), and a spectacularly good looking lady who Mrs Limey assumed to be Baggy's wife.

The lady left to go to the bathroom.  When she returned, Jeff got her seat for her, which made Mrs Limey all gooey.  I hated to do it, but I pointed out that that wasn't his wife, but his new girlfriend.  his wife was probably outside going through the restaurant garbage.

Anyway, that was it.

Next week, I'll tell you about the time we saw Biggio at the AMC 30 on Dunvale.  We didn't talk to him either.  Future installements will include Gonzo at the Aeros, Daryle Ward at the Cadillac Bar in Keemah and Dierker at a charity roast.  I also was once cut off in traffic by Princess Anne.

20921
Talk Zone / Re: Anyone surprised? (totally non-bb void filling crap)
« on: November 08, 2006, 11:27:34 am »
Quote:

Nobody who made $2M last year needs alimony.  I don't understand why alimony isn't subject to some sort of needs-testing.



I started with the "alimony" thing, but perhaps that's the wrong word.  I believe Texas is quite an advantageous State in which to get divorced, because the law simply requires a division of the assets gained whilst married (plus child support if applicable).  For K-Fed or Phillippe, they should get their half of their wives' major moolah (perhaps not so much for Fed because she mostly disappeared once she hooked up with him).

20922
Talk Zone / Re: Anyone surprised? (totally non-bb void filling crap)
« on: November 07, 2006, 06:32:29 pm »
Quote:

Britney files for divorce

I told you it was crap.




Watch for K-Fed to file for alimony.  This could be fun.  They could have Judge Judy adjudicate the proceedings.

20923
Talk Zone / Re: what is in a name-yours
« on: November 07, 2006, 05:40:48 pm »
Quote:

I think I'm the guy who comes home and finds my old lady in a three way with Rocket Streamside and Dick Thunderbird.



Just be a man!  Don't squat outside the window and knock one out while your wife gets spit-roasted.

20924
Talk Zone / Re: what is in a name-yours
« on: November 07, 2006, 05:20:35 pm »
Quote:

Rocket Streamside



Would require a run-off with Dick Thunderbird.

20925
Talk Zone / Re: what is in a name-yours
« on: November 07, 2006, 05:18:39 pm »
Quote:

Sparky Northfield.  I'm not kidding.



Oscar Charterhouse.  I could start every scene with a cravat and cigarette holder.

20926
Talk Zone / Re: Pence...
« on: November 06, 2006, 09:28:41 pm »
Quote:

I don't know, but if he wins, I'm singing "Asshole From El Paso" all day long.



He wants to make Willie Nelson his Energy Czar...which is clearly insane.  He should be Agriculture Czar.

20927
Talk Zone / Re: Handy Checklist
« on: November 06, 2006, 06:59:19 pm »
Quote:

c) Would this player fit in with the Astros' team philosophy?



And poof!  Up in smoke goes all talk of trading for Sheffield.

20928
Talk Zone / Re: what is in a name-yours
« on: November 06, 2006, 06:57:13 pm »
Quote:

That would make me "Major County Road 145". But for about 3 months a few years back I would have been Major Nut.



There has to be a meat puppet called "Buster Nut".  There just has to be.

20929
Talk Zone / Re: TZ Hall of Fame?
« on: November 06, 2006, 06:43:23 pm »
Quote:

I find it hard to believe that a fraud of that size can be run by only a couple people at the top. Enron had a fake trading floor set up, and run only when investors were coming through. Getting a hundred people to jump around and yell like bond traders? and no one knew it was a scam?

Someone as high as HD apparently was, had to have known.

IMHO, the only reason most of them were unhappy was they could not transfer their 401(k) money out when they saw the house of cards about to collapse.




I used to do work for Enron.  The whole place seemed crazy to me, and they would enter into long term contracts with insane requirements that would not be maintainable even in the short term.  It all made perfect sense once it was clear that the individuals didn't care about the long term, as they were bonused on the massively exaggerated forecasts used to get the venture capital to sign on.  I don't know who, if any, of these people knew of the corporate accounting fraud going on, but they had to know that their own deal was completely bogus.

I drew fire from HD when I described him as being in the "engine room" of the disaster.  He thought I was accusing him of working Skilling's calculator, which wasn't what I meant.  It was simply that the financial models used to get other people to stump up the financing (everything was done with other people's money) and HD worked in the area where those models were created.  I have no idea what he knew, but as I said he appeared to be aware that Enron was a house of cards.  He was clearly not alone in that.

As for the "wronged" employees, I have some sympathy.  Many had drunk the kool aid and had no idea that it was all a fraud.  They lost their jobs and their pensions, and that's terrible.  Non-Enron employees suffered too.  All the service providers, of which I was one, who saw that business disappear.  I changed jobs and did ok, but I don't know how many others were as lucky as me.

My sympathy runs out, however, when the talk turns to the 401k's.  Greed drove them to put all their retirement money into Enron stock, because it was a rocket ship every year.  When it fell, it took about 6 months to drop from $90 to nothing, and they could've got off the ride at any point (other than the famous lock down period that lasted three weeks during which the stock fell about $10).  Diversity is the key to a sound investment strategy, and they all abandoned that in favour of big money.

Oh, and they always boo-hoo about how much it was worth when the stock was $90, not how much they actually paid for it, which is all they actually lost.  Just like your winnings in Vegas:  It's not your money until you take the cash off the table and leave the casino.

20930
Talk Zone / Re: TZ Hall of Fame?
« on: November 06, 2006, 03:26:54 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Hetero wasn't funny. He was annoying. And an Enron lackey that probably still believes nothing was wrong with Enron and he should still be working there.




Huh?


huh?




I don't understand what you're saying. Are you saying that H.D. was an Enron lackey who probably still believes nothing was wrong with Enron?



FWIW, according to the newspaper reports, HD worked with (or on, I can't remember) the software that Enron used to generate its financial models for its business ventures.  Given that such models were shown to be completely fanciful at best, it seems quite possible that HD was aware of that end of the fiasco.  Such awareness would explain his seemingly undeserved but explosive diatribes against the Houston business community and those associated with it.

The repeated use of "fraud" and "lackey" as insults against us, his pointed comments to Ken Lay in an online chat session and the internet postings for which he was fired, all suggest this to be the case.

20931
Talk Zone / Re: Pence...
« on: November 04, 2006, 04:56:05 pm »
Quote:

Fenton can be coy all he wants about it meaning feeling lonely after a breakup, but there's no doubt the song is about whacking off to a girl's picture.



I think your interpretation says more about you than Fenton!

20932
Talk Zone / Re: Who wants one?
« on: November 04, 2006, 03:44:33 pm »
Quote:

Harvey Feirstein.  There's your Jim Edmonds.  



Gay, and a complete drama queen.  Sign him up!

20933
Talk Zone / Re: Pence...
« on: November 04, 2006, 01:52:43 pm »
Quote:

I think it's a "psyched lone-ranger" but anyway, it always seemed to me the song was written from the perspective of a guy who is in prison... uh, feeling isolated and horny.



I copied and pasted from lyrics site, so I'll abstain from the debate.  As for the meaning, I think the isolation is self-imposed.  Horny or love-sick, too close to call.

20934
Talk Zone / Re: Pence...
« on: November 04, 2006, 10:54:54 am »
Quote:

You know what that song is about, don't you?



I know the common interpretation to which you allude.  However, Dave Fenton has said that it's actually about feeling so alienated and alone that after a break-up that it was like being a stranger in a foreign land.

"No sex, no drugs, no wine, no women
No fun, no sin, no you, no wonder it's dark
Everyone around me is a total stranger
Everyone avoids me like a Psyclone Ranger
Everyone"

The "other" meaning is more fun, and Fenton has toyed with people about it in the past.  I just don't think the lyrics support it.

20935
Talk Zone / Re: Pence...
« on: November 03, 2006, 07:43:53 pm »
Quote:

Why is that? The field tests are on camera. Are you saying it is easier to pass the field test, and the attorney can argue the blow?



Upon my arrival in the US, I was given the standard briefing by a staff attorney that, should I be stopped having had a couple, I should plead ignorance of my rights (not too hard a task) and politely ask to meet with an attorney.  You'll spend the night in the slammer (which I understand is automatic now anyway) but they won't have video of you doing the field tests nor a breath reading (they may still make you do them but the results shouldn't be admitted into the trial).

I guess if they hit you with a court order for a blood sample, you're probably fucked unless you want contempt of court instead of a DUI.  Don't know which would be better/worse, but pissing off cops/judges is rarely a good plan.

Better plan: Get the missus to drive (my fav.) or get a cab.

20936
Talk Zone / Re: Pence...
« on: November 03, 2006, 07:32:49 pm »
Quote:

Well, she was never supposed to know.  That was the beauty of my plan...if she was within distance to hear her phone calling mine, she wouldn't need to call me on the phone.  But alas, the inevitable happened...the ol' "there's something wrong with my phone it won't dial...let me test it out"...busted.



Did you scream "Nooooooooooo" in exaggerated slo-mo as she was dialling?

20937
Talk Zone / Re: Who wants one?
« on: November 03, 2006, 04:38:55 pm »
Pob as Jason Isringhausen.

20938
Talk Zone / Re: Who wants one?
« on: November 03, 2006, 04:35:01 pm »
Quote:

So, who gets to play the main characters?  Suggestions?  I'm wracking my brains trying to figure out how to get Tom Berenger and Gary Busey in there.




How about Gary Busey = Drinkin' Dave Duncan, and Tom Berenger = Anaheim Jimmy. (With a prosthetic fat lip, of course).



I was thinking of Nick Nolte, for Duncan.  Maybe Robert Carradine for LaBobble himself.  Mr. T as Pooholes.

Was Eckstein on the Jakes then?  He could be played by Dakota Fanning.

Maybe Tom Cruise could play Edmonds...from inside the closet.

20939
Talk Zone / Re: Pence...
« on: November 03, 2006, 04:25:46 pm »
Quote:

I just hate the drunks who drive and talk on the cell phones at the same time.



At least drunks mostly come at night, mostly.  Cell phone crazies are driving randomly all over the place, all fucking day.

20940
Talk Zone / Re: Who wants one?
« on: November 03, 2006, 04:06:49 pm »
Quote:

If this ain't the topper, La Bobble-Genius is now the subject of a  movie.

BFIBs, I'm certain,will become the BFOM (Best fans of Movies).




So, who gets to play the main characters?  Suggestions?  I'm wracking my brains trying to figure out how to get Tom Berenger and Gary Busey in there.

20941
Talk Zone / Re: Pence...
« on: November 03, 2006, 03:53:59 pm »
Quote:

Not knowing any of the circumstances of what Pence did, and acknowledging that DUI is a serious charge, I think throwing out the "he could of killed somebody" line is absurdly over the top.

Downing a bottle of tequila and hopping behind the car, yes, that's very bad and very dangerous. Not waiting the five minutes after having a couple of beers that drops your BAA from .08 to .07? That's a youthful indiscretion. And one is no more likely to "kill anybody" in the latter situation than drinking iced tea and getting behind the wheel.

DUI is always a serious charge, because that's what the legislators wanted it to be. It doesn't mean that in reality it ALWAYS a mortal risk to society.




Not in any way attempting to excuse D'ingUI but, while people are taking the moral high ground, it is also worth noting that studies have shown people driving while using a cell phone to have awareness and reactions no better than someone over the alcohol limit.

20942
Talk Zone / Re: TZ Hall of Fame?
« on: November 03, 2006, 03:40:05 pm »
Quote:

I made a passing reference to HD in a post earlier this year (during Lay's trial maybe) and almost instantaneously received an email from himself - not flattering, but as usual, entertaining in a perverse sort of way.



I got accused of trying to derail the class action suit(s) he's involved in because of things I wrote in the TZ about his job at Enron.  I didn't know whether to laugh, be flattered or be pissed off.

20943
Talk Zone / Re: Bagwell: A Historical Perspective
« on: November 03, 2006, 10:54:14 am »
Quote:

Exactly.  Notice that Bagwell is last in that group in every category.



Last in that group in every category.  5th all-time, ahead of every other major leaguer ever.  If it was so easy there'd be, I don't know, tens of players in the group, instead of 5.

FTR, it is simply a combination of the all-time "batting" stats available here  at ESPN.  I did not list doubles and triples as it does not change the result, and I did not include the negative stats of caught stealing and strikeouts for the same reason.

I also posted those who join the group if you ignore stolen bases - i.e. just hitting stats - and it swells to about 15 people.  All of whom you'll know.

20944
Talk Zone / Re: Pence...
« on: November 03, 2006, 09:12:25 am »
Quote:

Further information on the arrest is in the  MNDR.



Mugshot

20945
Talk Zone / Re: Bagwell: A Historical Perspective
« on: November 03, 2006, 09:04:28 am »
Quote:

I think you're forgetting Jimmie Foxx.



"Stealth" sucked.

20946
Talk Zone / Re: pravata's NYCU: Pence
« on: November 02, 2006, 09:32:41 pm »
Quote:

Unless you didn't.  The focus in the NYCU note was on his "strange" bowlegged look.  I think he'd fill a real void in the wierd stance department with the Astros.



Especially if the new hitting coach is Bagwell.

20947
Talk Zone / Re: Bagwell: A Historical Perspective
« on: November 02, 2006, 09:29:57 pm »
Quote:

That is why I said Gehrig is probably the only one who is someone you could say was a better 1B than Bagwell, ever.



We have only to wait 4 years, and the woodwork will creak...

20948
Talk Zone / Re: Bagwell: A Historical Perspective
« on: November 02, 2006, 06:51:26 pm »
Quote:

What's scary is that Gehrig played only 14 more games than Bagwell but drove in 466 more runs. He must've had somebody pretty good batting in front of him.



And while we're at it, Gary Sheffield is short of the mark in runs, ribs and walks, despite playing 3 more years (and counting).  He's also short a marble or two, and a whole boat-load of charm.

20949
Talk Zone / Re: Bagwell: A Historical Perspective
« on: November 02, 2006, 06:49:12 pm »
Quote:

What's scary is that Gehrig played only 14 more games than Bagwell but drove in 466 more runs. He must've had somebody pretty good batting in front of him.



Well he had 44 more homers.  As for the other 400-odd ribs...umm...

20950
Talk Zone / Re: Bagwell: A Historical Perspective
« on: November 02, 2006, 06:47:17 pm »
Quote:

Don't you think it's interesting that the rest of the players that reached Jeff's numbers all managed to play MANY more years and end with "much" higher counting stats (the power numbers anyway)?



It's not so much that these four players all played longer than Baggy; it's that Jeff is at #144 on the all-time games played rankings.  That means, of all of the 143 players who played more games than Bagwell, only 4 can best him in that combination* of stats.

* FTR, I could throw in doubles and triples too - which would be a combo including all the major offensive stats - but it doesn't change the list.

20951
Talk Zone / Re: Bagwell: A Historical Perspective
« on: November 02, 2006, 06:39:08 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

You're missing the point.  I'm not saying that Bagwell is in the same eschelon as these players.  However, it is important if one is deciding Jeff's HoF worthiness.  Look at it another way, Bagwell may be far behind these legends (and one a-hole), but no one else makes it at all.




Not missing the point. Just seeing it differently. Actually, here's the comparison through roughly the same number of games:
Player       G     R     H   HR   RBI    BB   SB
------------------------------------------------
Bagwell   2150  1517  2314  449  1529  1401  202
Aaron     2119  1519  2618  481  1541   802  187
Bonds     2143  1584  2157  494  1405  1547  471
Mays      2157  1596  2540  542  1505  1019  281
Robinson  2196  1516  2427  475  1455  1086  193
Also through that number of games:
Player     Avg   OBP   Slg
--------------------------
Bagwell   .297  .408  .540
Aaron     .316  .374  .565
Bonds     .289  .412  .567
Mays      .312  .387  .591
Robinson  .303  .394  .553




So, looking at it that way, it's just Baggy, Bones and Mays.  Sweet!

20952
Talk Zone / Re: Bagwell: A Historical Perspective
« on: November 02, 2006, 05:54:05 pm »
Quote:

Quote:

Players (and years played) who accumulated 1500 runs, 2300 hits, 400 homers, 1500 RBI, 1400 walks and 200 stolen bases in their careers:

Hank Aaron (23 years)
Barry Bonds (20 years and counting)
Willie Mays (22 years)
Frank Robinson (21 years)
Jeff Bagwell (15 years)
That is all.

Carve these names on a bat, and use it to beat anyone who claims that Bagwell is even marginal for the Hall.





With all due respect to Bagwell, one of these things is not like the other:
Player       R     H   HR   RBI    BB   SB
------------------------------------------
Aaron     2174  3771  755  2297  1402  240
Bonds     2152  2841  734  1930  2426  509
Mays      2062  3283  660  1903  1464  338
Robinson  1829  2943  586  1812  1420  204  
Bagwell   1517  2314  449  1529  1401  202




You're missing the point.  I'm not saying that Bagwell is in the same eschelon as these players.  However, it is important if one is deciding Jeff's HoF worthiness.  Look at it another way, Bagwell may be far behind these legends (and one a-hole), but no one else makes it at all.

Also, see my later post listing who comes into the group if you knock off stolen bases; still very special company.

20953
Talk Zone / Re: Bagwell: A Historical Perspective
« on: November 02, 2006, 05:03:28 pm »
Quote:

I'm as big a Bagwell fan as there is, but for this to be an honest comparison, you really ought to point out when each of these men passed that threshold.  For all I know, Aaron also passed it in his 15th season, but kept on playing for 8 more.



You're welcome to do that if you wish, but I think it's irrelevant.  The more important fact, IMHO, is that there are only 5 players all time who can claim to have achieved these thresholds in all six categories.

20954
Talk Zone / Re: TZ Hall of Fame?
« on: November 02, 2006, 04:43:23 pm »
Quote:

I'm about to get all sentimental.



Clearly you weren't one of the lucky ones on HD's personal e-mailing list.

20955
Talk Zone / Re: TZ Hall of Fame?
« on: November 02, 2006, 03:59:34 pm »
Quote:

HD's strength (aside from an amazing ability to ignore facts and reality) was his inventiveness with language: "gorvelling" (which may have started out as a mere transposition error but has since become a fixture), "bush-neck", and others sprouted from his fertile (fetid?) mind.  I think he deserves credit for the "more presents under the Christmas tree" dig, too.  It was almost too perfect when we learned that he worked at Enron.



HD was annointed a TZ Legend, in absentia, in 2002.

20956
Talk Zone / Too Much! Too Much Fucking Perspective
« on: November 02, 2006, 03:23:41 pm »
Quote:

Players (and years played) who accumulated 1500 runs, 2300 hits, 400 homers, 1500 RBI, 1400 walks and 200 stolen bases in their careers:

Hank Aaron (23 years)
Barry Bonds (20 years and counting)
Willie Mays (22 years)
Frank Robinson (21 years)
Jeff Bagwell (15 years)
That is all.

Carve these names on a bat, and use it to beat anyone who claims that Bagwell is even marginal for the Hall.





Just for a laff, if you knock stolen bases off the above combination of achievements, the following names get added to Bagwell's peer group:

Ruth, Mantle, Foxx, Williams, Matthews, Ott, Gehrig, Musial, Yastrzemski, that is all.

I've heard of some of these guys.

20957
Talk Zone / Re: Bagwell: A Historical Perspective
« on: November 02, 2006, 03:12:50 pm »
Quote:

most of which was done during the dome years.



...and in significantly fewer games.

20958
Talk Zone / Re: The Sheffield Option
« on: November 02, 2006, 03:06:53 pm »
Quote:

The only problem with this is that then you'd have Gary Sheffield on your team.



And the Astros turn to the dark side would be complete.

20959
Talk Zone / Re: I Was Going to go with "No Shit, Sherlock!", but...
« on: November 02, 2006, 03:04:34 pm »
Quote:

Most first basemen aren't known for stealing bases.



Exactly.

See also a historical perspective on how he relates to everyone, not just 1Bers.

20960
Talk Zone / Bagwell: A Historical Perspective
« on: November 02, 2006, 02:57:17 pm »
Players (and years played) who accumulated 1500 runs, 2300 hits, 400 homers, 1500 RBI, 1400 walks and 200 stolen bases in their careers:

Hank Aaron (23 years)
Barry Bonds (20 years and counting)
Willie Mays (22 years)
Frank Robinson (21 years)
Jeff Bagwell (15 years)
That is all.

Carve these names on a bat, and use it to beat anyone who claims that Bagwell is even marginal for the Hall.

20961
Talk Zone / Re: I Was Going to go with "No Shit, Sherlock!", but...
« on: November 02, 2006, 02:38:30 pm »
Quote:

the worst part of it is, thomas's comeback with the A's this year might actually cement this stupidity in alot of people's minds.



...and also conveniently ignores the fact that Thomas played more than half his games as DH.  Not wanting to poo-poo Thomas, just pointing out that he should be compared to other DHs while Bagwell should be compared to first basemen.

Edit:  Just to take one more lash at that deceased equine: even with his extra, resurgent season, Thomas still cannot trump that combination of stats accumulated by Bagwell.  And he never will (unless he's going to steal 170 bases next season).

20962
Talk Zone / Re: TZ Hall of Fame?
« on: November 02, 2006, 01:16:05 pm »
Quote:

Some (HD in particular) weren't exactly trying to be funny, either.



Some people try and be funny, be end up burying themselves under 200 tons of shit.

20963
Talk Zone / Re: Snake Baiting in Darwin, Australia (Void Related)
« on: November 02, 2006, 12:34:42 pm »
Quote:

Mr. Lyons, who admitted being drunk at the time...



I think the funniest part is his friend trying to get him awake by pouring beer on him.  Thanks mate!

20964
Talk Zone / Snake Baiting in Darwin, Australia (Void Related)
« on: November 02, 2006, 12:21:34 pm »

20965
Talk Zone / Re: I Was Going to go with "No Shit, Sherlock!", but...
« on: November 02, 2006, 12:14:38 pm »
Quote:

There is the off-chance that a national sports writer from the north east (in other words, Peter Gammons) will take it upon himself to champion Bagwell's cause.  Who knows.  I'm not going to worry or even think about his HOF odds until 2011.  It's not worth the frustration.  It also wouldn't hurt if the local writers, and I use that term loosely, would actually support his cause when his name shows up on the ballot.  But I don't want to set the bar too high for them.



Don't bet on it.  A couple of years ago, Gammons was discussing Frank Thomas' HoF chances.  No doubt first-balloter as far as Petey was concerned.  The obvious follow up question, given the spooky similarity between the two players (including birthday), was asked: What about Jeff Bagwell?  Hasn't done enough yet, was Gammons' answer.

Ummm...huh?

20966
Talk Zone / Re: I Was Going to go with "No Shit, Sherlock!", but...
« on: November 02, 2006, 11:43:21 am »
Quote:

Actually it is based on the last game you played in, so 2006 does counts towards his wait.  So I guess 2011, we can have a party.



I'm not certain that the toe-rags in the BBWA will vote him in first ballot.  They should, but there's too many fuckwits in there who will discount his numbers because of MMPUS, forgetting that he played the vast majority of his career with the Dome as his home park.  I also have little faith that his "intangibles" will be considered either, such as his prescient baserunning, laser-sharp baseball instincts and superb defense.

The Chronicle published the stats of the HoF first basemen vs. Bagwell.  While there are obviously players with better statistics than Bagwell in that esteemed list, there was not one who could best 2,300 hits and 1,500 runs and 1,500 RBI and 400 homers and 200 stolen bases.  Not one; not even Gehrig.

20967
Talk Zone / Re: Trout Fishing In Texas (Void Related)
« on: November 02, 2006, 09:18:03 am »
Quote:

Quote:

Let's see.  If I take Friday off...I can be in Ruidoso some time around midnight.  If I fish Saturday and leave Sunday at sun-up, I can make it back to Houston in time for work Monday.

Wow.  

32 hours of driving for 8 hours of fishing!  Genius.






You're not committed to winning.




He certainly seems committed to whining.

20968
Talk Zone / Re: Trout Fishing In Texas (Void Related)
« on: November 02, 2006, 09:16:28 am »
Quote:

I've never gone, but my understanding is that it gets pretty crowded after a stocking



Mmmmmmm.  Crowded stockings.

20969
Talk Zone / Re: The Void
« on: November 01, 2006, 06:40:34 pm »
Quote:

And don't let these guys talk you into an acoustic, if you really wanna shred.  True, if you just want to sit around the pool and pick some Jimmy Buffett tunes, an acoustic is probably more handy.  But if that acoustic just won't get loud enough for you, go for it man.



Just make sure that - before you go to the store - you've learned the "May I help you?" riff.

20970
Talk Zone / Re: TZ Hall of Fame?
« on: November 01, 2006, 06:25:51 pm »
Quote:

Ah.

It was more the posts than the people.  I don't care about the Golden Scott thing, just wanted to see a bunch of funny in one place.




I refer to my previous answer.

20971
Talk Zone / Re: TZ Hall of Fame?
« on: November 01, 2006, 06:12:00 pm »
Quote:

What the fuck?  Why did the Men In Charge stop doing this?



No worthy candidates?

20972
Talk Zone / Re: I Was Going to go with "No Shit, Sherlock!", but...
« on: November 01, 2006, 10:55:50 am »
Quote:

You know it is all about Chelsea.

Go Ballack Go.




"We're not trying to buy success," says Chelsea's summer signing Ballack, who is now the World's highest paid footballer at Pnds121,000 a week ($12mm a year).

20973
Talk Zone / Re: The Void
« on: October 31, 2006, 10:27:27 pm »
Quote:

Shiner 97 Bohemian Black Lager. Pretty good.



Agreed.  Starts off light but has a heavy beer's finish.  Not a good session beer, but if you're having just one...

20974
Talk Zone / Re: I Was Going to go with "No Shit, Sherlock!", but...
« on: October 31, 2006, 08:51:00 pm »
Quote:

True enough.  Liverpool or Arsenal then?  or are you going to keep me guessing...



Crystal Palace in wonderful South London.

Edit:  Here's some action for ya.

20975
Talk Zone / Re: I Was Going to go with "No Shit, Sherlock!", but...
« on: October 31, 2006, 06:18:41 pm »
Quote:

I say we deport Limey.



Bring friends.

20976
Talk Zone / Re: I Was Going to go with "No Shit, Sherlock!", but...
« on: October 31, 2006, 05:42:30 pm »
Quote:

ARghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!! Drogba scores....Unbelievable.  Barca is in bad shape so far this season.  Are you a Chelsea fan? or maybe United?



I don't think so.  Chelsea vs. Moan U would be like Yankees - Mets.

20977
Talk Zone / Re: I Was Going to go with "No Shit, Sherlock!", but...
« on: October 31, 2006, 05:32:06 pm »
Quote:

Cheers indeed.  Retire #5 on opening day in 07 and leave room for #7 in 08.  I was fan way before these two but they will always define Astro baseball.



Good news for you, Barca are beating Chelsea in the Champions League.

20978
Talk Zone / I Was Going to go with "No Shit, Sherlock!", but...
« on: October 31, 2006, 05:01:42 pm »
...this story actually deserves far more reverence than I am able to convey.  Jeff Bagwell is officially no longer an Astro.

It was Jeff's extraordinary performance in 1994 that literally forced me to pay attention to baseball.  We all became used to his absence in 2006, but the formal tie-cutting today is still a very sad day in the terms of my Astro-fandom.

Raise your glasses for Jeff Bagwell: probably the greatest Astro you've ever seen.

20979
Talk Zone / Re: Aramis Ramirez
« on: October 31, 2006, 11:40:42 am »
Quote:

Well, I'm assuming that Berkman is better off permanently at 1B.  I certainly think he is.



He's certainly more engaged at 1B and has admitted to zoning out when playing in the outfield.  However, until Pence or Jimmerson or someone is ready to stake a claim as a full-time big club outfielder (at which point Lance goes back to 1B), I quite like the idea of Lamb at 1st, Berkman in the OF and all that money available to shower on Pettitte and Schmidt.  Oh, and Errormiss.

20980
Talk Zone / Re: Aramis Ramirez
« on: October 31, 2006, 11:26:07 am »
Quote:

Ok, but if we're going to do that, why not just put Lamb at 1B and Lance back in RF?  Lance is a much better OF than Lamb would be.  Then you get both bats in the lineup and don't have to worry about a guy at a new position.



Out of my head.  NOW!

20981
Talk Zone / Re: Aramis Ramirez
« on: October 31, 2006, 11:24:55 am »
Quote:

But a general question...am I the only one thinking it's not the craziest idea out there to try to make Mike Lamb an outfielder?



Or put Lamb at 1B and Berkman in RF (presuming that his knee has healed enough now to take a full season in the outfield).

20982
Talk Zone / Re: Let's Get This Over With
« on: October 31, 2006, 11:22:31 am »
Quote:

Lee scares me: I think last year was his career year, and that whoever signs him will wind up overpaying.  I think Soriano will cost more, but I think he'll maintain his production level.

Doing this would probably make it impossible to sign another pitcher, but signing Ramirez and Soriano would certainly liven up the offense.  Of course, you probably can't do it for less than $25M-26M/year.




My dings were in response to the either-or question of trading pitching for Manny or simply signing Lee.  There's many other options out there for a team with cayshe to spend on FAs...such as the Astros.

20983
Talk Zone / Re: Let's Get This Over With
« on: October 31, 2006, 09:21:49 am »
Quote:

forget it. sign Lee as a FA and keep the pitchers.



Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding! Ding!

20984
Talk Zone / Re: The Void
« on: October 30, 2006, 06:07:54 pm »
Quote:

call-in radio idiots



Radiots?

20985
Talk Zone / Re: Tax Consultants?
« on: October 30, 2006, 06:06:04 pm »
Quote:

Dammit Jim, I'm an accountant, not a spell checker.




Jim?



I'll be flattering and say that you're too young to get that reference.

20986
Talk Zone / Re: Tax Consultants?
« on: October 30, 2006, 05:32:50 pm »
Quote:

He said a "good" tax consultant.



You mean one that doesn't spend all fucking day in a baseball chat room?

20987
Talk Zone / Re: The Void
« on: October 30, 2006, 03:57:49 pm »
Quote:

Shiner 97 Bohemian Black Lager. Pretty good. Still waiting for Dunkelweisen to reappear.



Bought a case of that at the weekend, but haven't tried it yet.  Looking forward to it...

20988
Talk Zone / Re: The Void
« on: October 30, 2006, 03:41:28 pm »
Quote:

For all the early ridiculous talk about Mario Williams being a bust, Reggie Bush is averaging 3 yards a carry and has 1 touchdown (and even an interception).



Which leaves Matt Leinart, who seems to be adapting to the NFL reasonably well.

Also, the knock on Williams isn't to do with what he's done in the league to date.  It's that he was never going to be mobile enough to play DE in the NFL, that he will bulk up and slow down as he spends more time in the league, and will inevitably end up as a middle lineman.  Probably sooner rather than later.

I don't know much, but I know that good DE's are much more sought after and harder to find than defensive linemen.

20989
Talk Zone / Re: Tax Consultants?
« on: October 30, 2006, 03:31:59 pm »
Quote:

Anyone here know of a good tax consultant, preferably with International experience?

PM me or e-mail at [email protected]




MusicMan?

20990
Talk Zone / Re: The Void
« on: October 30, 2006, 03:28:02 pm »
Quote:

Vince Young is the most overrated player to come out of college since Ryan Leaf.  He will not be an impact player in the NFL.  He will not last 5 seasons in the NFL.



As I've said elsewhere in the thread, the Texans could also have gone for Leinart or, committed to Carr as they were, Bush.

Just avoiding Young doesn't make the draft a success.  And it will be less of a success when Williams is moved into the middle of the defensive line (as smrter people than me have told me will happen).

20991
Talk Zone / Re: The Void
« on: October 30, 2006, 01:03:19 pm »
Quote:

Limey - I hear ya from a symbolic standpoint, my point is that from a football standpoint, singularly, Vince's performance yesterday in no way should be enough to validate one's (negative) opinion of the draft, unless you have a pre-existing emotional attachment to said player passed over. Besides, the 2006 draft class is shaping up to be the best one yet for the Texans, of course the previous clusterfucks make that achievement less substantial.



My poo-pooing of the draft isn't because of anything Young has done.  It's because the Texans decided to stay with Carr (didn't they give him an extension?), only to  bench "their guy" 7 games into the season.

They should've realised long before now that they had the wrong man at QB.  They had a golden opportunity to go in another direction, thought long and hard about it (presumably), decided to "stay the course", and were dead wrong.

20992
Talk Zone / Re: The Void
« on: October 30, 2006, 12:50:19 pm »
Quote:

vince is hardly tearing the league apart by any measure you wish to choose.  once he can throw the ball past 15 yards that doesnt cause the WR to stop and turn around to catch it, then maybe he might actually be of worth in the NFL.

and besides, considering it was only the fans clamoring for vince, who wasnt going to be drafted by the texans, mario williams or no,  i think this a bit of a reach.




The Texans passed on Young, AND Matt Leinart AND Reggie Bush.  It's not just Carr vs. Young.

20993
Talk Zone / Re: John P. Lopez, dumbass
« on: October 30, 2006, 12:46:34 pm »
Quote:

the real culprit is the editor; i honestly and sincerely don't think the chornicle employs any.



You have to look no further than the fact that the editorial content has been demoted from op-ed pieces to blogs.  The "journalists" are publishing their drivel directly to the public, without bothering with any editorial oversight.

20994
Talk Zone / Re: The Void
« on: October 30, 2006, 12:43:43 pm »
Quote:

Oh, not just the draft.

Vernand Morency, 3rd round pick - 101 yds rushing; traded for
Samkon Gado, UFA - did not play, inactive, coaches' decision.




I don't have too much depth of knowledge of the roster, but (relating this back to baseball) the Astros' drafting philosophy has been to pick the most talented player available when it's their turn to pick.  The Texans have the added option of trading the pick.  They decided to do neither of these and overlook three likely superstars to reach down the draft.  This has been a consistent ploy of the Texans, which is why they have been, and will continue to be, perhaps the crappiest team in the NFL.

The Texans have used their first pick on defense in each of the last 5 drafts (IIRC), and they have perhaps the worst defense in the NFL.  Towards the end of last season, that fabulous stadium was half-empty.  The tickets are sold, but the people aren't showing up to buy beer, dogs, shirts, hats, foam fingers etc. etc. etc.  The exodus will occur earlier this year, if it hasn't started already.

The Texans are a disaster of a ffranchise.

20995
Talk Zone / Re: The Void
« on: October 30, 2006, 12:00:45 pm »
Quote:

The Texans' 2006 draft lunacy, as you put it, was debatable prior to yesterday's Titans/Texans game. I'm not sure what Vince's 7/15 for 87 yards exposed, Carr out performed Vince and he (Carr) was benched for the whole second half.



The fact that Carr's benching came against Young is just a cruel irony.  The fact remains that Carr isn't going to lead this team anywhere, and yet they passed on two highly rated QBs in the draft (and on a fabulous running back who could take some pressure off Carr).  Now, 7 games in, they bench the guy who was so good that you didn't need Young or Leinart.

Just think about it from a marketing standpoint: if you had to by a kid a Texans' jersey today, who's number would you opt for?

20996
Talk Zone / Re: The Void
« on: October 30, 2006, 11:35:24 am »
Quote:

Which we will be reminded of twice a season from now ON.



Maybe more.  Matt Leinart is doing pretty well too.

20997
Talk Zone / Re: The Void
« on: October 30, 2006, 11:24:28 am »
Quote:

the Tennessee Vince's beat the houston texans and david carr was benched.



And thusly, the lunacy of the Texans' 2006 draft was laid wide open and exposed for all to see.

20998
Talk Zone / Re: footer: dunn and his drool
« on: October 30, 2006, 11:18:44 am »
Quote:

I tend to think that if players really do change their approach with RISP, it won't help them too much. You want them to expand the strike zone to make sure they don't walk?



Go and watch "Little Big League" where they very clearly and simply explain why this is way too complicated to answer with a "yes" and "no".

What base is the RISP on?  Who's hitting?  Who's on deck?  What inning?  Home or away?  What's the score?  Who's available to PH?  All of these things will have an impact on whether the hitter at the plate will choose to expand his zone or have a more patient approach (or even be told which to do by the manager).

20999
Talk Zone / Re: I guess for a few months..........
« on: October 28, 2006, 02:10:11 am »
Quote:

Also, fuck the Jakes.



Just think of all the stacks of WS '06 t-shirts at the airport...

21000
Talk Zone / Re: I guess for a few months..........
« on: October 28, 2006, 12:44:50 am »
Quote:

we have to call them the 1stinals. What a freakin ride for Jeff Weaver this year. I still hate them. But I think my hate for the AL is bigger and more uncontrollable. Screw your DH and All-Star wins.



They're still Jakes.

Pages: 1 ... 37 38 39 40 41 [42] 43 44 45 46 47